Loblaw Companies Limited
Loblaw Companies Limited (LBLCF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LBLCF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Grocery Stores Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LBLCF | $43.09 | -2.93% | 50.2B | 26.60 | $1.62 | +0.95% |
| TSCDF | $6.49 | -0.76% | 41.2B | 17.54 | $0.37 | +2.92% |
| TSCDY | $18.96 | -0.78% | 40.2B | 17.26 | $1.10 | +3.03% |
| AHODF | $45.50 | +0.00% | 40.1B | 15.37 | $2.96 | +3.18% |
| ADRNY | $43.35 | -0.91% | 38.2B | 14.64 | $2.96 | +3.35% |
| WOLWF | $26.50 | +0.00% | 32.4B | 48.18 | $0.55 | +2.30% |
| SVNDY | $12.16 | +0.50% | 28.1B | 15.99 | $0.76 | +2.60% |
| SVNDF | $11.27 | -12.30% | 26.1B | 14.83 | $0.76 | +2.93% |
| WNGRF | $68.94 | -1.39% | 26B | 35.91 | $1.92 | +1.26% |
| CLEGF | $15.00 | -6.25% | 20.1B | 27.27 | $0.55 | +3.36% |
Stock Comparison
LBLCF vs TSCDF Comparison May 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 50.2B. In comparison, TSCDF has a market cap of 41.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $43.09, while TSCDF trades at $6.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas TSCDF's P/E ratio is 17.54. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TSCDF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to TSCDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check TSCDF's competition here
LBLCF vs TSCDY Comparison May 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 50.2B. In comparison, TSCDY has a market cap of 40.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $43.09, while TSCDY trades at $18.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas TSCDY's P/E ratio is 17.26. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TSCDY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to TSCDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check TSCDY's competition here
LBLCF vs AHODF Comparison May 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 50.2B. In comparison, AHODF has a market cap of 40.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $43.09, while AHODF trades at $45.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas AHODF's P/E ratio is 15.37. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AHODF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to AHODF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check AHODF's competition here
LBLCF vs ADRNY Comparison May 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 50.2B. In comparison, ADRNY has a market cap of 38.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $43.09, while ADRNY trades at $43.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas ADRNY's P/E ratio is 14.64. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ADRNY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to ADRNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check ADRNY's competition here
LBLCF vs WOLWF Comparison May 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 50.2B. In comparison, WOLWF has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $43.09, while WOLWF trades at $26.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas WOLWF's P/E ratio is 48.18. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to WOLWF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to WOLWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check WOLWF's competition here
LBLCF vs SVNDY Comparison May 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 50.2B. In comparison, SVNDY has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $43.09, while SVNDY trades at $12.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas SVNDY's P/E ratio is 15.99. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SVNDY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to SVNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check SVNDY's competition here
LBLCF vs SVNDF Comparison May 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 50.2B. In comparison, SVNDF has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $43.09, while SVNDF trades at $11.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas SVNDF's P/E ratio is 14.83. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SVNDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to SVNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check SVNDF's competition here
LBLCF vs WNGRF Comparison May 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 50.2B. In comparison, WNGRF has a market cap of 26B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $43.09, while WNGRF trades at $68.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas WNGRF's P/E ratio is 35.91. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to WNGRF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to WNGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check WNGRF's competition here
LBLCF vs CLEGF Comparison May 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 50.2B. In comparison, CLEGF has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $43.09, while CLEGF trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas CLEGF's P/E ratio is 27.27. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CLEGF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to CLEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check CLEGF's competition here
LBLCF vs KKOYY Comparison May 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 50.2B. In comparison, KKOYY has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $43.09, while KKOYY trades at $12.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas KKOYY's P/E ratio is 19.63. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KKOYY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to KKOYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check KKOYY's competition here
LBLCF vs CRRFY Comparison May 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 50.2B. In comparison, CRRFY has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $43.09, while CRRFY trades at $4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas CRRFY's P/E ratio is 12.29. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CRRFY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to CRRFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check CRRFY's competition here
LBLCF vs CRERF Comparison May 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 50.2B. In comparison, CRERF has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $43.09, while CRERF trades at $20.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas CRERF's P/E ratio is 12.04. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CRERF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to CRERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check CRERF's competition here
LBLCF vs MTRAF Comparison May 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 50.2B. In comparison, MTRAF has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $43.09, while MTRAF trades at $65.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas MTRAF's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MTRAF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to MTRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check MTRAF's competition here
LBLCF vs CVPBF Comparison May 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 50.2B. In comparison, CVPBF has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $43.09, while CVPBF trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas CVPBF's P/E ratio is 13.60. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CVPBF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to CVPBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check CVPBF's competition here
LBLCF vs CVPUF Comparison May 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 50.2B. In comparison, CVPUF has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $43.09, while CVPUF trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas CVPUF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CVPUF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to CVPUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check CVPUF's competition here
LBLCF vs JSNSF Comparison May 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 50.2B. In comparison, JSNSF has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $43.09, while JSNSF trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas JSNSF's P/E ratio is 18.75. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to JSNSF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to JSNSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check JSNSF's competition here
LBLCF vs KKOYF Comparison May 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 50.2B. In comparison, KKOYF has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $43.09, while KKOYF trades at $23.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas KKOYF's P/E ratio is 22.20. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KKOYF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to KKOYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check KKOYF's competition here
LBLCF vs JSAIY Comparison May 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 50.2B. In comparison, JSAIY has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $43.09, while JSAIY trades at $16.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas JSAIY's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to JSAIY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to JSAIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check JSAIY's competition here
LBLCF vs DNOPY Comparison May 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 50.2B. In comparison, DNOPY has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $43.09, while DNOPY trades at $8.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas DNOPY's P/E ratio is 18.65. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to DNOPY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to DNOPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check DNOPY's competition here
LBLCF vs EMLAF Comparison May 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 50.2B. In comparison, EMLAF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $43.09, while EMLAF trades at $33.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas EMLAF's P/E ratio is 68.96. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to EMLAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to EMLAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check EMLAF's competition here
LBLCF vs AXFOF Comparison May 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 50.2B. In comparison, AXFOF has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $43.09, while AXFOF trades at $33.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas AXFOF's P/E ratio is 32.14. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AXFOF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to AXFOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check AXFOF's competition here
LBLCF vs BMBRF Comparison May 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 50.2B. In comparison, BMBRF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $43.09, while BMBRF trades at $11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas BMBRF's P/E ratio is 16.91. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BMBRF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to BMBRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check BMBRF's competition here
LBLCF vs CPPCY Comparison May 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 50.2B. In comparison, CPPCY has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $43.09, while CPPCY trades at $7.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas CPPCY's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CPPCY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to CPPCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check CPPCY's competition here
LBLCF vs DFILF Comparison May 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 50.2B. In comparison, DFILF has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $43.09, while DFILF trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas DFILF's P/E ratio is 26.76. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to DFILF's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to DFILF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check DFILF's competition here
LBLCF vs AXFOY Comparison May 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 50.2B. In comparison, AXFOY has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $43.09, while AXFOY trades at $27.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas AXFOY's P/E ratio is 26.71. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AXFOY's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to AXFOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check AXFOY's competition here
LBLCF vs GCHEF Comparison May 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 50.2B. In comparison, GCHEF has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $43.09, while GCHEF trades at $5.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas GCHEF's P/E ratio is 15.26. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GCHEF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to GCHEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check GCHEF's competition here
LBLCF vs DFIHY Comparison May 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 50.2B. In comparison, DFIHY has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $43.09, while DFIHY trades at $19.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas DFIHY's P/E ratio is -14.26. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to DFIHY's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to DFIHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check DFIHY's competition here
LBLCF vs KOBNF Comparison May 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 50.2B. In comparison, KOBNF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $43.09, while KOBNF trades at $24.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas KOBNF's P/E ratio is 26.48. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KOBNF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to KOBNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check KOBNF's competition here
LBLCF vs CUYTF Comparison May 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 50.2B. In comparison, CUYTF has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $43.09, while CUYTF trades at $37.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas CUYTF's P/E ratio is 12.52. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CUYTF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to CUYTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check CUYTF's competition here
LBLCF vs CUYTY Comparison May 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 50.2B. In comparison, CUYTY has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $43.09, while CUYTY trades at $9.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas CUYTY's P/E ratio is 12.97. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CUYTY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to CUYTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check CUYTY's competition here
LBLCF vs OCDDY Comparison May 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 50.2B. In comparison, OCDDY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $43.09, while OCDDY trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas OCDDY's P/E ratio is -4.14. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to OCDDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to OCDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check OCDDY's competition here
LBLCF vs OCDGF Comparison May 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 50.2B. In comparison, OCDGF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $43.09, while OCDGF trades at $2.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas OCDGF's P/E ratio is -4.05. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to OCDGF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to OCDGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check OCDGF's competition here
LBLCF vs GGGSY Comparison May 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 50.2B. In comparison, GGGSY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $43.09, while GGGSY trades at $6.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas GGGSY's P/E ratio is 12.13. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GGGSY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to GGGSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check GGGSY's competition here
LBLCF vs GGGSF Comparison May 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 50.2B. In comparison, GGGSF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $43.09, while GGGSF trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas GGGSF's P/E ratio is 12.04. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GGGSF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to GGGSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check GGGSF's competition here
LBLCF vs NNWWF Comparison May 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 50.2B. In comparison, NNWWF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $43.09, while NNWWF trades at $36.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas NNWWF's P/E ratio is 17.37. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NNWWF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to NNWWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check NNWWF's competition here
LBLCF vs CGUSY Comparison May 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 50.2B. In comparison, CGUSY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $43.09, while CGUSY trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas CGUSY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CGUSY's ROE of -33.50%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to CGUSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check CGUSY's competition here
LBLCF vs SHUFF Comparison May 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 50.2B. In comparison, SHUFF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $43.09, while SHUFF trades at $4.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas SHUFF's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SHUFF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to SHUFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check SHUFF's competition here
LBLCF vs RLEVF Comparison May 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 50.2B. In comparison, RLEVF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $43.09, while RLEVF trades at $74.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas RLEVF's P/E ratio is 15.38. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to RLEVF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to RLEVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check RLEVF's competition here
LBLCF vs EUSHY Comparison May 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 50.2B. In comparison, EUSHY has a market cap of 250.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $43.09, while EUSHY trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas EUSHY's P/E ratio is -36.00. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to EUSHY's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to EUSHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check EUSHY's competition here
LBLCF vs EUSHF Comparison May 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 50.2B. In comparison, EUSHF has a market cap of 238M. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $43.09, while EUSHF trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas EUSHF's P/E ratio is -10.69. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to EUSHF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to EUSHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check EUSHF's competition here
LBLCF vs CGUIF Comparison May 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 50.2B. In comparison, CGUIF has a market cap of 91M. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $43.09, while CGUIF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas CGUIF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CGUIF's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to CGUIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check CGUIF's competition here
LBLCF vs HCMC Comparison May 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 50.2B. In comparison, HCMC has a market cap of 26.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $43.09, while HCMC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas HCMC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to HCMC's ROE of +2.93%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to HCMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check HCMC's competition here
LBLCF vs FLOCF Comparison May 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 50.2B. In comparison, FLOCF has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $43.09, while FLOCF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas FLOCF's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to FLOCF's ROE of +2.82%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to FLOCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check FLOCF's competition here
LBLCF vs MTVX Comparison May 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 50.2B. In comparison, MTVX has a market cap of 822.8K. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $43.09, while MTVX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas MTVX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MTVX's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to MTVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check MTVX's competition here
LBLCF vs OMHI Comparison May 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 50.2B. In comparison, OMHI has a market cap of 20.9K. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $43.09, while OMHI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas OMHI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to OMHI's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to OMHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check OMHI's competition here
LBLCF vs IFMK Comparison May 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 50.2B. In comparison, IFMK has a market cap of 9.6K. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $43.09, while IFMK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas IFMK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to IFMK's ROE of +4.63%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to IFMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check IFMK's competition here
LBLCF vs HWIN Comparison May 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 50.2B. In comparison, HWIN has a market cap of 3.6K. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $43.09, while HWIN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas HWIN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to HWIN's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to HWIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check HWIN's competition here
LBLCF vs MFLTY Comparison May 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 50.2B. In comparison, MFLTY has a market cap of 1.6K. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $43.09, while MFLTY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas MFLTY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MFLTY's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to MFLTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check MFLTY's competition here
LBLCF vs QKLS Comparison May 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 50.2B. In comparison, QKLS has a market cap of 152. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $43.09, while QKLS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 26.60, whereas QKLS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.25%, compared to QKLS's ROE of -2.85%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to QKLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check QKLS's competition here