Loblaw Companies Limited
Loblaw Companies Limited (LBLCF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LBLCF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Grocery Stores Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LBLCF | $45.48 | +0.37% | 53.3B | 29.53 | $1.54 | +0.91% |
| ADRNY | $48.48 | -0.54% | 43.1B | 16.39 | $2.95 | +2.60% |
| AHODF | $48.11 | +1.39% | 42.5B | 16.31 | $2.95 | +3.04% |
| TSCDY | $20.02 | -0.87% | 41.8B | 17.92 | $1.10 | +2.92% |
| TSCDF | $6.58 | +0.78% | 38.1B | 16.22 | $0.37 | +3.15% |
| WOLWF | $26.50 | +0.00% | 32.4B | 48.18 | $0.55 | +2.21% |
| SVNDF | $13.00 | +0.00% | 30.1B | 17.33 | $0.75 | +2.54% |
| SVNDY | $11.96 | -3.86% | 28.1B | 16.23 | $0.75 | +2.58% |
| WNGRF | $70.83 | +0.18% | 27.3B | 37.06 | $1.91 | +1.23% |
| CLEGF | $16.00 | +0.00% | 21.5B | 29.63 | $0.54 | +3.14% |
Stock Comparison
LBLCF vs ADRNY Comparison April 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 53.3B. In comparison, ADRNY has a market cap of 43.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $45.48, while ADRNY trades at $48.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas ADRNY's P/E ratio is 16.39. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to ADRNY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to ADRNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check ADRNY's competition here
LBLCF vs AHODF Comparison April 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 53.3B. In comparison, AHODF has a market cap of 42.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $45.48, while AHODF trades at $48.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas AHODF's P/E ratio is 16.31. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AHODF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to AHODF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check AHODF's competition here
LBLCF vs TSCDY Comparison April 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 53.3B. In comparison, TSCDY has a market cap of 41.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $45.48, while TSCDY trades at $20.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas TSCDY's P/E ratio is 17.92. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TSCDY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to TSCDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check TSCDY's competition here
LBLCF vs TSCDF Comparison April 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 53.3B. In comparison, TSCDF has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $45.48, while TSCDF trades at $6.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas TSCDF's P/E ratio is 16.22. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to TSCDF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to TSCDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check TSCDF's competition here
LBLCF vs WOLWF Comparison April 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 53.3B. In comparison, WOLWF has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $45.48, while WOLWF trades at $26.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas WOLWF's P/E ratio is 48.18. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to WOLWF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to WOLWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check WOLWF's competition here
LBLCF vs SVNDF Comparison April 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 53.3B. In comparison, SVNDF has a market cap of 30.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $45.48, while SVNDF trades at $13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas SVNDF's P/E ratio is 17.33. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SVNDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to SVNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check SVNDF's competition here
LBLCF vs SVNDY Comparison April 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 53.3B. In comparison, SVNDY has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $45.48, while SVNDY trades at $11.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas SVNDY's P/E ratio is 16.23. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SVNDY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to SVNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check SVNDY's competition here
LBLCF vs WNGRF Comparison April 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 53.3B. In comparison, WNGRF has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $45.48, while WNGRF trades at $70.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas WNGRF's P/E ratio is 37.06. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to WNGRF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to WNGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check WNGRF's competition here
LBLCF vs CLEGF Comparison April 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 53.3B. In comparison, CLEGF has a market cap of 21.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $45.48, while CLEGF trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas CLEGF's P/E ratio is 29.63. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CLEGF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to CLEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check CLEGF's competition here
LBLCF vs KKOYY Comparison April 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 53.3B. In comparison, KKOYY has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $45.48, while KKOYY trades at $11.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas KKOYY's P/E ratio is 19.68. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KKOYY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to KKOYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check KKOYY's competition here
LBLCF vs MTRAF Comparison April 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 53.3B. In comparison, MTRAF has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $45.48, while MTRAF trades at $65.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas MTRAF's P/E ratio is 19.17. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MTRAF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to MTRAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check MTRAF's competition here
LBLCF vs CRERF Comparison April 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 53.3B. In comparison, CRERF has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $45.48, while CRERF trades at $19.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas CRERF's P/E ratio is 11.55. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CRERF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to CRERF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check CRERF's competition here
LBLCF vs CRRFY Comparison April 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 53.3B. In comparison, CRRFY has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $45.48, while CRRFY trades at $3.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas CRRFY's P/E ratio is 11.34. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CRRFY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to CRRFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check CRRFY's competition here
LBLCF vs CVPBF Comparison April 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 53.3B. In comparison, CVPBF has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $45.48, while CVPBF trades at $1.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas CVPBF's P/E ratio is 14.75. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CVPBF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to CVPBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check CVPBF's competition here
LBLCF vs CPPCY Comparison April 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 53.3B. In comparison, CPPCY has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $45.48, while CPPCY trades at $13.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas CPPCY's P/E ratio is 13.66. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CPPCY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to CPPCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check CPPCY's competition here
LBLCF vs CVPUF Comparison April 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 53.3B. In comparison, CVPUF has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $45.48, while CVPUF trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas CVPUF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CVPUF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to CVPUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check CVPUF's competition here
LBLCF vs JSNSF Comparison April 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 53.3B. In comparison, JSNSF has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $45.48, while JSNSF trades at $4.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas JSNSF's P/E ratio is 19.72. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to JSNSF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to JSNSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check JSNSF's competition here
LBLCF vs JSAIY Comparison April 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 53.3B. In comparison, JSAIY has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $45.48, while JSAIY trades at $18.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas JSAIY's P/E ratio is 18.47. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to JSAIY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to JSAIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check JSAIY's competition here
LBLCF vs KKOYF Comparison April 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 53.3B. In comparison, KKOYF has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $45.48, while KKOYF trades at $23.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas KKOYF's P/E ratio is 22.20. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KKOYF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to KKOYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check KKOYF's competition here
LBLCF vs DNOPY Comparison April 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 53.3B. In comparison, DNOPY has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $45.48, while DNOPY trades at $9.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas DNOPY's P/E ratio is 20.77. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DNOPY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to DNOPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check DNOPY's competition here
LBLCF vs EMLAF Comparison April 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 53.3B. In comparison, EMLAF has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $45.48, while EMLAF trades at $34.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas EMLAF's P/E ratio is 70.12. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to EMLAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to EMLAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check EMLAF's competition here
LBLCF vs BMBRF Comparison April 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 53.3B. In comparison, BMBRF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $45.48, while BMBRF trades at $11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas BMBRF's P/E ratio is 16.91. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to BMBRF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to BMBRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check BMBRF's competition here
LBLCF vs DFILF Comparison April 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 53.3B. In comparison, DFILF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $45.48, while DFILF trades at $4.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas DFILF's P/E ratio is 27.35. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DFILF's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to DFILF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check DFILF's competition here
LBLCF vs AXFOY Comparison April 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 53.3B. In comparison, AXFOY has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $45.48, while AXFOY trades at $27.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas AXFOY's P/E ratio is 26.71. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AXFOY's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to AXFOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check AXFOY's competition here
LBLCF vs DFIHY Comparison April 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 53.3B. In comparison, DFIHY has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $45.48, while DFIHY trades at $21.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas DFIHY's P/E ratio is -15.36. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to DFIHY's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to DFIHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check DFIHY's competition here
LBLCF vs GCHEF Comparison April 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 53.3B. In comparison, GCHEF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $45.48, while GCHEF trades at $5.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas GCHEF's P/E ratio is 14.87. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GCHEF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to GCHEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check GCHEF's competition here
LBLCF vs KOBNF Comparison April 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 53.3B. In comparison, KOBNF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $45.48, while KOBNF trades at $24.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas KOBNF's P/E ratio is 26.48. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to KOBNF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to KOBNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check KOBNF's competition here
LBLCF vs CUYTF Comparison April 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 53.3B. In comparison, CUYTF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $45.48, while CUYTF trades at $44.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas CUYTF's P/E ratio is 14.65. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CUYTF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to CUYTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check CUYTF's competition here
LBLCF vs AXFOF Comparison April 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 53.3B. In comparison, AXFOF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $45.48, while AXFOF trades at $24.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas AXFOF's P/E ratio is 23.34. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to AXFOF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to AXFOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check AXFOF's competition here
LBLCF vs CUYTY Comparison April 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 53.3B. In comparison, CUYTY has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $45.48, while CUYTY trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas CUYTY's P/E ratio is 13.15. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CUYTY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to CUYTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check CUYTY's competition here
LBLCF vs SHUFF Comparison April 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 53.3B. In comparison, SHUFF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $45.48, while SHUFF trades at $12.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas SHUFF's P/E ratio is 16.04. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to SHUFF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to SHUFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check SHUFF's competition here
LBLCF vs GGGSY Comparison April 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 53.3B. In comparison, GGGSY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $45.48, while GGGSY trades at $7.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas GGGSY's P/E ratio is 13.89. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GGGSY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to GGGSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check GGGSY's competition here
LBLCF vs OCDDY Comparison April 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 53.3B. In comparison, OCDDY has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $45.48, while OCDDY trades at $5.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas OCDDY's P/E ratio is -4.23. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OCDDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to OCDDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check OCDDY's competition here
LBLCF vs OCDGF Comparison April 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 53.3B. In comparison, OCDGF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $45.48, while OCDGF trades at $2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas OCDGF's P/E ratio is -4.19. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OCDGF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to OCDGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check OCDGF's competition here
LBLCF vs GGGSF Comparison April 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 53.3B. In comparison, GGGSF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $45.48, while GGGSF trades at $21.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas GGGSF's P/E ratio is 13.54. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to GGGSF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to GGGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check GGGSF's competition here
LBLCF vs NNWWF Comparison April 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 53.3B. In comparison, NNWWF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $45.48, while NNWWF trades at $37.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas NNWWF's P/E ratio is 17.80. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to NNWWF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to NNWWF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check NNWWF's competition here
LBLCF vs CGUSY Comparison April 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 53.3B. In comparison, CGUSY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $45.48, while CGUSY trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas CGUSY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CGUSY's ROE of -33.50%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to CGUSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check CGUSY's competition here
LBLCF vs RLEVF Comparison April 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 53.3B. In comparison, RLEVF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $45.48, while RLEVF trades at $74.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas RLEVF's P/E ratio is 15.38. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to RLEVF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to RLEVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check RLEVF's competition here
LBLCF vs EUSHY Comparison April 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 53.3B. In comparison, EUSHY has a market cap of 267.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $45.48, while EUSHY trades at $1.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas EUSHY's P/E ratio is -38.50. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to EUSHY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to EUSHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check EUSHY's competition here
LBLCF vs EUSHF Comparison April 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 53.3B. In comparison, EUSHF has a market cap of 238M. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $45.48, while EUSHF trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas EUSHF's P/E ratio is -10.69. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to EUSHF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to EUSHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check EUSHF's competition here
LBLCF vs CGUIF Comparison April 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 53.3B. In comparison, CGUIF has a market cap of 91M. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $45.48, while CGUIF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas CGUIF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to CGUIF's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to CGUIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check CGUIF's competition here
LBLCF vs HCMC Comparison April 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 53.3B. In comparison, HCMC has a market cap of 52.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $45.48, while HCMC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas HCMC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HCMC's ROE of +2.93%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to HCMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check HCMC's competition here
LBLCF vs FLOCF Comparison April 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 53.3B. In comparison, FLOCF has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $45.48, while FLOCF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas FLOCF's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to FLOCF's ROE of +2.82%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to FLOCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check FLOCF's competition here
LBLCF vs MTVX Comparison April 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 53.3B. In comparison, MTVX has a market cap of 822.8K. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $45.48, while MTVX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas MTVX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MTVX's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to MTVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check MTVX's competition here
LBLCF vs IFMK Comparison April 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 53.3B. In comparison, IFMK has a market cap of 48.1K. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $45.48, while IFMK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas IFMK's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to IFMK's ROE of +4.63%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to IFMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check IFMK's competition here
LBLCF vs OMHI Comparison April 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 53.3B. In comparison, OMHI has a market cap of 20.9K. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $45.48, while OMHI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas OMHI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to OMHI's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to OMHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check OMHI's competition here
LBLCF vs HWIN Comparison April 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 53.3B. In comparison, HWIN has a market cap of 3.6K. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $45.48, while HWIN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas HWIN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to HWIN's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is less volatile compared to HWIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check HWIN's competition here
LBLCF vs MFLTY Comparison April 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 53.3B. In comparison, MFLTY has a market cap of 776. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $45.48, while MFLTY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas MFLTY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to MFLTY's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to MFLTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check MFLTY's competition here
LBLCF vs QKLS Comparison April 2026
LBLCF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LBLCF stands at 53.3B. In comparison, QKLS has a market cap of 152. Regarding current trading prices, LBLCF is priced at $45.48, while QKLS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LBLCF currently has a P/E ratio of 29.53, whereas QKLS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LBLCF's ROE is +0.24%, compared to QKLS's ROE of -2.85%. Regarding short-term risk, LBLCF is more volatile compared to QKLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LBLCF.Check QKLS's competition here