Tesco PLC
Tesco PLC (TSCDY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TSCDY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Grocery Stores Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSCDY | $19.50 | +2.20% | 42.3B | 21.67 | $0.90 | +2.84% |
| LBLCF | $46.54 | +1.04% | 54.5B | 30.62 | $1.52 | +0.88% |
| ADRNY | $48.27 | +1.28% | 43B | 16.70 | $2.89 | +2.81% |
| AHODF | $47.75 | +2.25% | 42.2B | 16.52 | $2.89 | +2.81% |
| TSCDF | $6.34 | +1.77% | 40.3B | 21.13 | $0.30 | +2.98% |
| SVNDY | $13.68 | -0.87% | 32.6B | 22.80 | $0.60 | +1.12% |
| SVNDF | $12.78 | +0.00% | 30.4B | 21.30 | $0.60 | +2.33% |
| WOLWF | $22.67 | +0.00% | 27.7B | 41.22 | $0.55 | +2.70% |
| WNGRF | $70.69 | +0.00% | 27.1B | 37.40 | $1.89 | +1.23% |
| CLEGF | $14.96 | +0.00% | 20.1B | 28.23 | $0.53 | +3.35% |
Stock Comparison
TSCDY vs LBLCF Comparison April 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 42.3B. In comparison, LBLCF has a market cap of 54.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $19.50, while LBLCF trades at $46.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas LBLCF's P/E ratio is 30.62. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LBLCF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to LBLCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check LBLCF's competition here
TSCDY vs ADRNY Comparison April 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 42.3B. In comparison, ADRNY has a market cap of 43B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $19.50, while ADRNY trades at $48.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas ADRNY's P/E ratio is 16.70. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ADRNY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to ADRNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check ADRNY's competition here
TSCDY vs AHODF Comparison April 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 42.3B. In comparison, AHODF has a market cap of 42.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $19.50, while AHODF trades at $47.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas AHODF's P/E ratio is 16.52. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AHODF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to AHODF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check AHODF's competition here
TSCDY vs TSCDF Comparison April 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 42.3B. In comparison, TSCDF has a market cap of 40.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $19.50, while TSCDF trades at $6.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas TSCDF's P/E ratio is 21.13. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TSCDF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is less volatile compared to TSCDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check TSCDF's competition here
TSCDY vs SVNDY Comparison April 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 42.3B. In comparison, SVNDY has a market cap of 32.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $19.50, while SVNDY trades at $13.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas SVNDY's P/E ratio is 22.80. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SVNDY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to SVNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check SVNDY's competition here
TSCDY vs SVNDF Comparison April 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 42.3B. In comparison, SVNDF has a market cap of 30.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $19.50, while SVNDF trades at $12.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas SVNDF's P/E ratio is 21.30. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SVNDF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to SVNDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check SVNDF's competition here
TSCDY vs WOLWF Comparison April 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 42.3B. In comparison, WOLWF has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $19.50, while WOLWF trades at $22.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas WOLWF's P/E ratio is 41.22. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WOLWF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to WOLWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check WOLWF's competition here
TSCDY vs WNGRF Comparison April 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 42.3B. In comparison, WNGRF has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $19.50, while WNGRF trades at $70.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas WNGRF's P/E ratio is 37.40. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WNGRF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to WNGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check WNGRF's competition here
TSCDY vs CLEGF Comparison April 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 42.3B. In comparison, CLEGF has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $19.50, while CLEGF trades at $14.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas CLEGF's P/E ratio is 28.23. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CLEGF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to CLEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check CLEGF's competition here
TSCDY vs KKOYY Comparison April 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 42.3B. In comparison, KKOYY has a market cap of 17.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $19.50, while KKOYY trades at $11.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas KKOYY's P/E ratio is 18.81. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KKOYY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to KKOYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check KKOYY's competition here
TSCDY vs MTRAF Comparison April 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 42.3B. In comparison, MTRAF has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $19.50, while MTRAF trades at $67.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas MTRAF's P/E ratio is 20.81. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MTRAF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to MTRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check MTRAF's competition here
TSCDY vs CRRFY Comparison April 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 42.3B. In comparison, CRRFY has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $19.50, while CRRFY trades at $3.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas CRRFY's P/E ratio is 11.45. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CRRFY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is less volatile compared to CRRFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check CRRFY's competition here
TSCDY vs CRERF Comparison April 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 42.3B. In comparison, CRERF has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $19.50, while CRERF trades at $18.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas CRERF's P/E ratio is 11.22. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CRERF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to CRERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check CRERF's competition here
TSCDY vs CVPBF Comparison April 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 42.3B. In comparison, CVPBF has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $19.50, while CVPBF trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas CVPBF's P/E ratio is 15.11. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CVPBF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to CVPBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check CVPBF's competition here
TSCDY vs CPPCY Comparison April 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 42.3B. In comparison, CPPCY has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $19.50, while CPPCY trades at $13.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas CPPCY's P/E ratio is 13.79. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CPPCY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to CPPCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check CPPCY's competition here
TSCDY vs CVPUF Comparison April 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 42.3B. In comparison, CVPUF has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $19.50, while CVPUF trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas CVPUF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CVPUF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to CVPUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check CVPUF's competition here
TSCDY vs JSAIY Comparison April 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 42.3B. In comparison, JSAIY has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $19.50, while JSAIY trades at $18.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas JSAIY's P/E ratio is 19.04. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JSAIY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to JSAIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check JSAIY's competition here
TSCDY vs JSNSF Comparison April 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 42.3B. In comparison, JSNSF has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $19.50, while JSNSF trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas JSNSF's P/E ratio is 18.20. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JSNSF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to JSNSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check JSNSF's competition here
TSCDY vs DNOPY Comparison April 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 42.3B. In comparison, DNOPY has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $19.50, while DNOPY trades at $9.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas DNOPY's P/E ratio is 21.05. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DNOPY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is less volatile compared to DNOPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check DNOPY's competition here
TSCDY vs KKOYF Comparison April 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 42.3B. In comparison, KKOYF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $19.50, while KKOYF trades at $22.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas KKOYF's P/E ratio is 20.56. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KKOYF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to KKOYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check KKOYF's competition here
TSCDY vs EMLAF Comparison April 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 42.3B. In comparison, EMLAF has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $19.50, while EMLAF trades at $36.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas EMLAF's P/E ratio is 75.42. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EMLAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to EMLAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check EMLAF's competition here
TSCDY vs BMBRF Comparison April 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 42.3B. In comparison, BMBRF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $19.50, while BMBRF trades at $11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas BMBRF's P/E ratio is 16.91. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BMBRF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is less volatile compared to BMBRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check BMBRF's competition here
TSCDY vs DFILF Comparison April 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 42.3B. In comparison, DFILF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $19.50, while DFILF trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas DFILF's P/E ratio is 26.47. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DFILF's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is less volatile compared to DFILF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check DFILF's competition here
TSCDY vs AXFOY Comparison April 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 42.3B. In comparison, AXFOY has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $19.50, while AXFOY trades at $27.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas AXFOY's P/E ratio is 26.71. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AXFOY's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to AXFOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check AXFOY's competition here
TSCDY vs DFIHY Comparison April 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 42.3B. In comparison, DFIHY has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $19.50, while DFIHY trades at $21.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas DFIHY's P/E ratio is -15.36. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DFIHY's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is less volatile compared to DFIHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check DFIHY's competition here
TSCDY vs GCHEF Comparison April 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 42.3B. In comparison, GCHEF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $19.50, while GCHEF trades at $6.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas GCHEF's P/E ratio is 16.30. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GCHEF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to GCHEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check GCHEF's competition here
TSCDY vs KOBNF Comparison April 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 42.3B. In comparison, KOBNF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $19.50, while KOBNF trades at $24.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas KOBNF's P/E ratio is 26.48. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KOBNF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to KOBNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check KOBNF's competition here
TSCDY vs CUYTF Comparison April 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 42.3B. In comparison, CUYTF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $19.50, while CUYTF trades at $44.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas CUYTF's P/E ratio is 14.65. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CUYTF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to CUYTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check CUYTF's competition here
TSCDY vs AXFOF Comparison April 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 42.3B. In comparison, AXFOF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $19.50, while AXFOF trades at $24.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas AXFOF's P/E ratio is 23.34. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AXFOF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to AXFOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check AXFOF's competition here
TSCDY vs CUYTY Comparison April 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 42.3B. In comparison, CUYTY has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $19.50, while CUYTY trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas CUYTY's P/E ratio is 13.53. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CUYTY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to CUYTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check CUYTY's competition here
TSCDY vs SHUFF Comparison April 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 42.3B. In comparison, SHUFF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $19.50, while SHUFF trades at $12.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas SHUFF's P/E ratio is 16.04. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SHUFF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is less volatile compared to SHUFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check SHUFF's competition here
TSCDY vs GGGSF Comparison April 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 42.3B. In comparison, GGGSF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $19.50, while GGGSF trades at $21.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas GGGSF's P/E ratio is 13.77. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GGGSF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is less volatile compared to GGGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check GGGSF's competition here
TSCDY vs OCDDY Comparison April 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 42.3B. In comparison, OCDDY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $19.50, while OCDDY trades at $4.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas OCDDY's P/E ratio is -3.84. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OCDDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to OCDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check OCDDY's competition here
TSCDY vs GGGSY Comparison April 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 42.3B. In comparison, GGGSY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $19.50, while GGGSY trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas GGGSY's P/E ratio is 12.26. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GGGSY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to GGGSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check GGGSY's competition here
TSCDY vs OCDGF Comparison April 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 42.3B. In comparison, OCDGF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $19.50, while OCDGF trades at $2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas OCDGF's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OCDGF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is less volatile compared to OCDGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check OCDGF's competition here
TSCDY vs NNWWF Comparison April 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 42.3B. In comparison, NNWWF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $19.50, while NNWWF trades at $39.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas NNWWF's P/E ratio is 18.40. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NNWWF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to NNWWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check NNWWF's competition here
TSCDY vs CGUSY Comparison April 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 42.3B. In comparison, CGUSY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $19.50, while CGUSY trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas CGUSY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CGUSY's ROE of -33.50%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to CGUSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check CGUSY's competition here
TSCDY vs RLEVF Comparison April 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 42.3B. In comparison, RLEVF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $19.50, while RLEVF trades at $74.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas RLEVF's P/E ratio is 15.38. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RLEVF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is less volatile compared to RLEVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check RLEVF's competition here
TSCDY vs EUSHY Comparison April 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 42.3B. In comparison, EUSHY has a market cap of 267.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $19.50, while EUSHY trades at $1.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas EUSHY's P/E ratio is -38.50. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EUSHY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is less volatile compared to EUSHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check EUSHY's competition here
TSCDY vs EUSHF Comparison April 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 42.3B. In comparison, EUSHF has a market cap of 238M. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $19.50, while EUSHF trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas EUSHF's P/E ratio is -10.69. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EUSHF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to EUSHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check EUSHF's competition here
TSCDY vs CGUIF Comparison April 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 42.3B. In comparison, CGUIF has a market cap of 91M. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $19.50, while CGUIF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas CGUIF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CGUIF's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to CGUIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check CGUIF's competition here
TSCDY vs FLOCF Comparison April 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 42.3B. In comparison, FLOCF has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $19.50, while FLOCF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas FLOCF's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FLOCF's ROE of +2.82%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to FLOCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check FLOCF's competition here
TSCDY vs HCMC Comparison April 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 42.3B. In comparison, HCMC has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $19.50, while HCMC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas HCMC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HCMC's ROE of +2.93%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is less volatile compared to HCMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check HCMC's competition here
TSCDY vs MTVX Comparison April 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 42.3B. In comparison, MTVX has a market cap of 822.8K. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $19.50, while MTVX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas MTVX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MTVX's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is less volatile compared to MTVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check MTVX's competition here
TSCDY vs IFMK Comparison April 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 42.3B. In comparison, IFMK has a market cap of 48.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $19.50, while IFMK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas IFMK's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IFMK's ROE of +4.63%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is less volatile compared to IFMK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check IFMK's competition here
TSCDY vs OMHI Comparison April 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 42.3B. In comparison, OMHI has a market cap of 20.9K. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $19.50, while OMHI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas OMHI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to OMHI's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is less volatile compared to OMHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check OMHI's competition here
TSCDY vs HWIN Comparison April 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 42.3B. In comparison, HWIN has a market cap of 3.6K. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $19.50, while HWIN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas HWIN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HWIN's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is less volatile compared to HWIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check HWIN's competition here
TSCDY vs MFLTY Comparison April 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 42.3B. In comparison, MFLTY has a market cap of 2.3K. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $19.50, while MFLTY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas MFLTY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MFLTY's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is less volatile compared to MFLTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check MFLTY's competition here
TSCDY vs QKLS Comparison April 2026
TSCDY plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TSCDY stands at 42.3B. In comparison, QKLS has a market cap of 152. Regarding current trading prices, TSCDY is priced at $19.50, while QKLS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TSCDY currently has a P/E ratio of 21.67, whereas QKLS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TSCDY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to QKLS's ROE of -2.85%. Regarding short-term risk, TSCDY is more volatile compared to QKLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TSCDY.Check QKLS's competition here