Terreno Realty Corporation

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 5.8B. In comparison, PLD has a market cap of 98.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $56.07, while PLD trades at $105.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas PLD's P/E ratio is 26.58. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PLD's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to PLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 5.8B. In comparison, PSA has a market cap of 52.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $56.07, while PSA trades at $293.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas PSA's P/E ratio is 29.61. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PSA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is less volatile compared to PSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 5.8B. In comparison, PSA-PK has a market cap of 52B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $56.07, while PSA-PK trades at $18.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas PSA-PK's P/E ratio is 1.84. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PSA-PK's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to PSA-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 5.8B. In comparison, PSA-PH has a market cap of 51.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $56.07, while PSA-PH trades at $22.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas PSA-PH's P/E ratio is 2.19. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PSA-PH's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to PSA-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 5.8B. In comparison, EXR has a market cap of 31.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $56.07, while EXR trades at $147.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas EXR's P/E ratio is 35.08. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EXR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is less volatile compared to EXR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 5.8B. In comparison, LSI has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $56.07, while LSI trades at $133.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas LSI's P/E ratio is 30.95. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LSI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is less volatile compared to LSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 5.8B. In comparison, LINE has a market cap of 9.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $56.07, while LINE trades at $43.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas LINE's P/E ratio is -16.02. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LINE's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is less volatile compared to LINE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 5.8B. In comparison, CUBE has a market cap of 9.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $56.07, while CUBE trades at $42.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas CUBE's P/E ratio is 25.23. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CUBE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is less volatile compared to CUBE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 5.8B. In comparison, EGP has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $56.07, while EGP trades at $167.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas EGP's P/E ratio is 36.71. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to EGP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to EGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 5.8B. In comparison, REXR-PB has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $56.07, while REXR-PB trades at $22.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas REXR-PB's P/E ratio is 25.39. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to REXR-PB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to REXR-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 5.8B. In comparison, REXR has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $56.07, while REXR trades at $35.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas REXR's P/E ratio is 29.41. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to REXR's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is less volatile compared to REXR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 5.8B. In comparison, STAG has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $56.07, while STAG trades at $36.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas STAG's P/E ratio is 27.48. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to STAG's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to STAG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 5.8B. In comparison, FR has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $56.07, while FR trades at $48.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas FR's P/E ratio is 24.06. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to FR's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is less volatile compared to FR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 5.8B. In comparison, REXR-PC has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $56.07, while REXR-PC trades at $21.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas REXR-PC's P/E ratio is 23.84. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to REXR-PC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to REXR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 5.8B. In comparison, COLD has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $56.07, while COLD trades at $16.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas COLD's P/E ratio is -39.62. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to COLD's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is less volatile compared to COLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 5.8B. In comparison, NSA-PA has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $56.07, while NSA-PA trades at $22.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas NSA-PA's P/E ratio is 21.98. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NSA-PA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is less volatile compared to NSA-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 5.8B. In comparison, PSA-PF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $56.07, while PSA-PF trades at $20.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas PSA-PF's P/E ratio is 1.99. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PSA-PF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to PSA-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 5.8B. In comparison, PSA-PG has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $56.07, while PSA-PG trades at $20.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas PSA-PG's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PSA-PG's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to PSA-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 5.8B. In comparison, PSA-PI has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $56.07, while PSA-PI trades at $19.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas PSA-PI's P/E ratio is 1.88. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PSA-PI's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to PSA-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 5.8B. In comparison, PSA-PJ has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $56.07, while PSA-PJ trades at $18.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas PSA-PJ's P/E ratio is 1.81. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PSA-PJ's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to PSA-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 5.8B. In comparison, PSA-PL has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $56.07, while PSA-PL trades at $18.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas PSA-PL's P/E ratio is 1.80. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PSA-PL's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is less volatile compared to PSA-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 5.8B. In comparison, GRP-UN has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $56.07, while GRP-UN trades at $50.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas GRP-UN's P/E ratio is 13.74. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GRP-UN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to GRP-UN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 5.8B. In comparison, PSA-PM has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $56.07, while PSA-PM trades at $16.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas PSA-PM's P/E ratio is 1.63. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PSA-PM's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to PSA-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 5.8B. In comparison, PSA-PS has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $56.07, while PSA-PS trades at $16.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas PSA-PS's P/E ratio is 1.59. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PSA-PS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to PSA-PS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 5.8B. In comparison, PSA-PP has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $56.07, while PSA-PP trades at $15.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas PSA-PP's P/E ratio is 1.55. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PSA-PP's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to PSA-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 5.8B. In comparison, PSA-PQ has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $56.07, while PSA-PQ trades at $15.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas PSA-PQ's P/E ratio is 1.54. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PSA-PQ's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to PSA-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 5.8B. In comparison, PSA-PR has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $56.07, while PSA-PR trades at $15.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas PSA-PR's P/E ratio is 1.54. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PSA-PR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to PSA-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 5.8B. In comparison, PSA-PO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $56.07, while PSA-PO trades at $15.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas PSA-PO's P/E ratio is 1.51. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PSA-PO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to PSA-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 5.8B. In comparison, PSA-PN has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $56.07, while PSA-PN trades at $15.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas PSA-PN's P/E ratio is 1.51. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PSA-PN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to PSA-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 5.8B. In comparison, NSA has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $56.07, while NSA trades at $31.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas NSA's P/E ratio is 53.54. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NSA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is less volatile compared to NSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 5.8B. In comparison, LXP has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $56.07, while LXP trades at $8.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas LXP's P/E ratio is 41.78. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LXP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to LXP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 5.8B. In comparison, LXP-PC has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $56.07, while LXP-PC trades at $46.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas LXP-PC's P/E ratio is 38.04. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LXP-PC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to LXP-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 5.8B. In comparison, IIPR-PA has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $56.07, while IIPR-PA trades at $23.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas IIPR-PA's P/E ratio is 4.91. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IIPR-PA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to IIPR-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 5.8B. In comparison, IIPR has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $56.07, while IIPR trades at $55.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas IIPR's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to IIPR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is less volatile compared to IIPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 5.8B. In comparison, PMTU has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $56.07, while PMTU trades at $25.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas PMTU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PMTU's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to PMTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 5.8B. In comparison, SCCD has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $56.07, while SCCD trades at $21.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas SCCD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SCCD's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to SCCD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 5.8B. In comparison, SCCE has a market cap of 912.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $56.07, while SCCE trades at $19.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas SCCE's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SCCE's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to SCCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 5.8B. In comparison, DHCNI has a market cap of 885.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $56.07, while DHCNI trades at $15.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas DHCNI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DHCNI's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is less volatile compared to DHCNI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 5.8B. In comparison, RCC has a market cap of 781.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $56.07, while RCC trades at $24.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas RCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to RCC's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to RCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 5.8B. In comparison, PLYM has a market cap of 740.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $56.07, while PLYM trades at $16.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas PLYM's P/E ratio is 5.33. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PLYM's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is less volatile compared to PLYM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 5.8B. In comparison, LANDO has a market cap of 696.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $56.07, while LANDO trades at $19.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas LANDO's P/E ratio is -66.88. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LANDO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to LANDO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 5.8B. In comparison, TFSA has a market cap of 566.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $56.07, while TFSA trades at $23.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas TFSA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TFSA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is less volatile compared to TFSA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 5.8B. In comparison, TPTA has a market cap of 474.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $56.07, while TPTA trades at $18.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas TPTA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to TPTA's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to TPTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 5.8B. In comparison, NHPAP has a market cap of 436.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $56.07, while NHPAP trades at $14.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas NHPAP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NHPAP's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is less volatile compared to NHPAP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 5.8B. In comparison, LAND has a market cap of 374.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $56.07, while LAND trades at $10.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas LAND's P/E ratio is -41.36. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LAND's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to LAND. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 5.8B. In comparison, LANDM has a market cap of 373.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $56.07, while LANDM trades at $24.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas LANDM's P/E ratio is -225.45. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LANDM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to LANDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 5.8B. In comparison, ILPT has a market cap of 304.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $56.07, while ILPT trades at $4.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas ILPT's P/E ratio is -3.22. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ILPT's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is less volatile compared to ILPT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 5.8B. In comparison, LPA has a market cap of 226.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $56.07, while LPA trades at $6.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas LPA's P/E ratio is 10.10. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to LPA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is less volatile compared to LPA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 5.8B. In comparison, PLYM-PA has a market cap of 186.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $56.07, while PLYM-PA trades at $24.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas PLYM-PA's P/E ratio is -27.36. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PLYM-PA's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to PLYM-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 5.8B. In comparison, AJXA has a market cap of 140.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $56.07, while AJXA trades at $25.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas AJXA's P/E ratio is 17.28. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AJXA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to AJXA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 5.8B. In comparison, SCCB has a market cap of 116.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $56.07, while SCCB trades at $24.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas SCCB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SCCB's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to SCCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 5.8B. In comparison, SACC has a market cap of 99M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $56.07, while SACC trades at $24.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas SACC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SACC's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to SACC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 5.8B. In comparison, SELF has a market cap of 60.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $56.07, while SELF trades at $5.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas SELF's P/E ratio is 24.23. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SELF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is less volatile compared to SELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 5.8B. In comparison, SCCF has a market cap of 51.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $56.07, while SCCF trades at $19.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas SCCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SCCF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to SCCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 5.8B. In comparison, PW-PA has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $56.07, while PW-PA trades at $4.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas PW-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PW-PA's ROE of -3.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is less volatile compared to PW-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 5.8B. In comparison, DRE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $56.07, while DRE trades at $48.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas DRE's P/E ratio is 19.44. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to DRE's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to DRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 5.8B. In comparison, QTS-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $56.07, while QTS-PA trades at $25.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas QTS-PA's P/E ratio is -48.33. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to QTS-PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to QTS-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 5.8B. In comparison, MNR-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $56.07, while MNR-PC trades at $25.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas MNR-PC's P/E ratio is 81.65. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MNR-PC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to MNR-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 5.8B. In comparison, QTS-PB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $56.07, while QTS-PB trades at $172.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas QTS-PB's P/E ratio is -387.38. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to QTS-PB's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to QTS-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 5.8B. In comparison, QTS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $56.07, while QTS trades at $77.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas QTS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to QTS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to QTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.

TRNO plays a significant role within the Real Estate sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRNO stands at 5.8B. In comparison, CONE has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRNO is priced at $56.07, while CONE trades at $90.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRNO currently has a P/E ratio of 28.41, whereas CONE's P/E ratio is 451.80. In terms of profitability, TRNO's ROE is +0.05%, compared to CONE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRNO is more volatile compared to CONE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRNO.