Trinity Capital Inc. - 7.00% No

TRINL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRINL stands at 1B. In comparison, BNJ has a market cap of 97B. Regarding current trading prices, TRINL is priced at $25.07, while BNJ trades at $14.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRINL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BNJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRINL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BNJ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRINL is more volatile compared to BNJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRINL.

TRINL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRINL stands at 1B. In comparison, SFB has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TRINL is priced at $25.07, while SFB trades at $22.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRINL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SFB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRINL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SFB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TRINL is less volatile compared to SFB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRINL.

TRINL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRINL stands at 1B. In comparison, MGRB has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TRINL is priced at $25.07, while MGRB trades at $16.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRINL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGRB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRINL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MGRB's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRINL is more volatile compared to MGRB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRINL.

TRINL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRINL stands at 1B. In comparison, MGR has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRINL is priced at $25.07, while MGR trades at $20.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRINL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRINL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MGR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRINL is more volatile compared to MGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRINL.

TRINL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRINL stands at 1B. In comparison, MGRD has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TRINL is priced at $25.07, while MGRD trades at $15.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRINL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MGRD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRINL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MGRD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TRINL is more volatile compared to MGRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRINL.

TRINL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRINL stands at 1B. In comparison, CGBDL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TRINL is priced at $25.07, while CGBDL trades at $25.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRINL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CGBDL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRINL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CGBDL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TRINL is more volatile compared to CGBDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRINL.

TRINL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRINL stands at 1B. In comparison, FCRX has a market cap of 913.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRINL is priced at $25.07, while FCRX trades at $24.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRINL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FCRX's P/E ratio is 173.66. In terms of profitability, TRINL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FCRX's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TRINL is more volatile compared to FCRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRINL.

TRINL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRINL stands at 1B. In comparison, BULLW has a market cap of 587.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TRINL is priced at $25.07, while BULLW trades at $4.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRINL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BULLW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRINL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BULLW's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TRINL is less volatile compared to BULLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRINL.

TRINL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRINL stands at 1B. In comparison, GLADZ has a market cap of 585.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRINL is priced at $25.07, while GLADZ trades at $25.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRINL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLADZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRINL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GLADZ's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TRINL is more volatile compared to GLADZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRINL.

TRINL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRINL stands at 1B. In comparison, SAJ has a market cap of 390.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TRINL is priced at $25.07, while SAJ trades at $25.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRINL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAJ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRINL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SAJ's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRINL is more volatile compared to SAJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRINL.

TRINL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRINL stands at 1B. In comparison, SAZ has a market cap of 390.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TRINL is priced at $25.07, while SAZ trades at $25.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRINL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRINL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SAZ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TRINL is more volatile compared to SAZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRINL.

TRINL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRINL stands at 1B. In comparison, SAY has a market cap of 390.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TRINL is priced at $25.07, while SAY trades at $25.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRINL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRINL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SAY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TRINL is more volatile compared to SAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRINL.

TRINL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRINL stands at 1B. In comparison, BTMWW has a market cap of 265.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TRINL is priced at $25.07, while BTMWW trades at $0.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRINL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BTMWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRINL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BTMWW's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TRINL is less volatile compared to BTMWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRINL.

TRINL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRINL stands at 1B. In comparison, WHFCL has a market cap of 203.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TRINL is priced at $25.07, while WHFCL trades at $25.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRINL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WHFCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRINL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WHFCL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TRINL is more volatile compared to WHFCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRINL.

TRINL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRINL stands at 1B. In comparison, GECCZ has a market cap of 125M. Regarding current trading prices, TRINL is priced at $25.07, while GECCZ trades at $25.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRINL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GECCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRINL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GECCZ's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TRINL is more volatile compared to GECCZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRINL.

TRINL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRINL stands at 1B. In comparison, RILYZ has a market cap of 97.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TRINL is priced at $25.07, while RILYZ trades at $6.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRINL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RILYZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRINL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RILYZ's ROE of +19.61%. Regarding short-term risk, TRINL is less volatile compared to RILYZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRINL.

TRINL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRINL stands at 1B. In comparison, GEGGL has a market cap of 56.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TRINL is priced at $25.07, while GEGGL trades at $23.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRINL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEGGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRINL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GEGGL's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TRINL is more volatile compared to GEGGL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRINL.

TRINL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRINL stands at 1B. In comparison, STSB has a market cap of 15.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TRINL is priced at $25.07, while STSB trades at $22.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRINL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas STSB's P/E ratio is 24.58. In terms of profitability, TRINL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to STSB's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TRINL is less volatile compared to STSB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRINL.

TRINL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRINL stands at 1B. In comparison, CAS has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, TRINL is priced at $25.07, while CAS trades at $30.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRINL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CAS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRINL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CAS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRINL is more volatile compared to CAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRINL.

TRINL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRINL stands at 1B. In comparison, ZBAI has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TRINL is priced at $25.07, while ZBAI trades at $0.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRINL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ZBAI's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, TRINL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ZBAI's ROE of -0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, TRINL is less volatile compared to ZBAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRINL.

TRINL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRINL stands at 1B. In comparison, HBTA has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, TRINL is priced at $25.07, while HBTA trades at $25.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRINL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas HBTA's P/E ratio is 28.93. In terms of profitability, TRINL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HBTA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TRINL is more volatile compared to HBTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRINL.

TRINL plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TRINL stands at 1B. In comparison, GJH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, TRINL is priced at $25.07, while GJH trades at $9.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TRINL currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GJH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TRINL's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GJH's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TRINL is more volatile compared to GJH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TRINL.