Torrent Power Limited (TORNTPOWER.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TORNTPOWER.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Independent Power Producers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TORNTPOWER.NS | ₹1,419.40 | +0.32% | 715.2B | 29.73 | ₹47.75 | +1.41% |
| ADANIPOWER.BO | ₹218.40 | +0.97% | 4.2T | 32.84 | ₹6.65 | N/A |
| ADANIPOWER.NS | ₹218.45 | +0.98% | 4.2T | 32.60 | ₹6.70 | N/A |
| ADANIENSOL.NS | ₹1,654.00 | +2.19% | 2T | 82.95 | ₹19.94 | N/A |
| ADANIENSOL.BO | ₹1,654.15 | +2.25% | 2T | 84.57 | ₹19.56 | N/A |
| TATAPOWER.NS | ₹381.30 | +1.54% | 1.2T | 32.56 | ₹11.71 | +0.66% |
| TATAPOWER.BO | ₹381.25 | +1.56% | 1.2T | 32.59 | ₹11.70 | +0.66% |
| JSWENERGY.BO | ₹553.30 | +3.77% | 1T | 43.33 | ₹12.77 | +0.36% |
| JSWENERGY.NS | ₹553.45 | +3.75% | 1T | 43.14 | ₹12.83 | +0.36% |
| ADANITRANS.NS | ₹890.40 | -7.26% | 993.2B | 72.45 | ₹12.29 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TORNTPOWER.NS vs ADANIPOWER.BO Comparison July 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 715.2B. In comparison, ADANIPOWER.BO has a market cap of 4.2T. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,419.40, while ADANIPOWER.BO trades at ₹218.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas ADANIPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 32.84. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ADANIPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is more volatile compared to ADANIPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check ADANIPOWER.BO's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs ADANIPOWER.NS Comparison July 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 715.2B. In comparison, ADANIPOWER.NS has a market cap of 4.2T. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,419.40, while ADANIPOWER.NS trades at ₹218.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas ADANIPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 32.60. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ADANIPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is more volatile compared to ADANIPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check ADANIPOWER.NS's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs ADANIENSOL.NS Comparison July 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 715.2B. In comparison, ADANIENSOL.NS has a market cap of 2T. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,419.40, while ADANIENSOL.NS trades at ₹1,654.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas ADANIENSOL.NS's P/E ratio is 82.95. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ADANIENSOL.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is less volatile compared to ADANIENSOL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check ADANIENSOL.NS's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs ADANIENSOL.BO Comparison July 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 715.2B. In comparison, ADANIENSOL.BO has a market cap of 2T. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,419.40, while ADANIENSOL.BO trades at ₹1,654.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas ADANIENSOL.BO's P/E ratio is 84.57. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ADANIENSOL.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is less volatile compared to ADANIENSOL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check ADANIENSOL.BO's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs TATAPOWER.NS Comparison July 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 715.2B. In comparison, TATAPOWER.NS has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,419.40, while TATAPOWER.NS trades at ₹381.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas TATAPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 32.56. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TATAPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is more volatile compared to TATAPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check TATAPOWER.NS's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs TATAPOWER.BO Comparison July 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 715.2B. In comparison, TATAPOWER.BO has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,419.40, while TATAPOWER.BO trades at ₹381.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas TATAPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 32.59. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TATAPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is more volatile compared to TATAPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check TATAPOWER.BO's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs JSWENERGY.BO Comparison July 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 715.2B. In comparison, JSWENERGY.BO has a market cap of 1T. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,419.40, while JSWENERGY.BO trades at ₹553.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas JSWENERGY.BO's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JSWENERGY.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is less volatile compared to JSWENERGY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check JSWENERGY.BO's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs JSWENERGY.NS Comparison July 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 715.2B. In comparison, JSWENERGY.NS has a market cap of 1T. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,419.40, while JSWENERGY.NS trades at ₹553.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas JSWENERGY.NS's P/E ratio is 43.14. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JSWENERGY.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is less volatile compared to JSWENERGY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check JSWENERGY.NS's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs ADANITRANS.NS Comparison July 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 715.2B. In comparison, ADANITRANS.NS has a market cap of 993.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,419.40, while ADANITRANS.NS trades at ₹890.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas ADANITRANS.NS's P/E ratio is 72.45. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ADANITRANS.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is less volatile compared to ADANITRANS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check ADANITRANS.NS's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs TORNTPOWER.BO Comparison July 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 715.2B. In comparison, TORNTPOWER.BO has a market cap of 715.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,419.40, while TORNTPOWER.BO trades at ₹1,419.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas TORNTPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 29.81. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TORNTPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is more volatile compared to TORNTPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check TORNTPOWER.BO's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs JPPOWER.NS Comparison July 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 715.2B. In comparison, JPPOWER.NS has a market cap of 116.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,419.40, while JPPOWER.NS trades at ₹17.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas JPPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 41.38. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JPPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is more volatile compared to JPPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check JPPOWER.NS's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs JPPOWER.BO Comparison July 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 715.2B. In comparison, JPPOWER.BO has a market cap of 116.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,419.40, while JPPOWER.BO trades at ₹17.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas JPPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 25.80. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JPPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is more volatile compared to JPPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check JPPOWER.BO's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs WAAREERTL.BO Comparison July 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 715.2B. In comparison, WAAREERTL.BO has a market cap of 106.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,419.40, while WAAREERTL.BO trades at ₹1,015.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas WAAREERTL.BO's P/E ratio is 18.81. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WAAREERTL.BO's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is more volatile compared to WAAREERTL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check WAAREERTL.BO's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs RPOWER.BO Comparison July 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 715.2B. In comparison, RPOWER.BO has a market cap of 103.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,419.40, while RPOWER.BO trades at ₹25.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas RPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is -31.01. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RPOWER.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is more volatile compared to RPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check RPOWER.BO's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs RPOWER.NS Comparison July 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 715.2B. In comparison, RPOWER.NS has a market cap of 103.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,419.40, while RPOWER.NS trades at ₹25.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas RPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is -38.99. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RPOWER.NS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is more volatile compared to RPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check RPOWER.NS's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs PTC.NS Comparison July 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 715.2B. In comparison, PTC.NS has a market cap of 51B. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,419.40, while PTC.NS trades at ₹172.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas PTC.NS's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PTC.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is more volatile compared to PTC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check PTC.NS's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs PTC.BO Comparison July 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 715.2B. In comparison, PTC.BO has a market cap of 51B. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,419.40, while PTC.BO trades at ₹172.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas PTC.BO's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PTC.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is more volatile compared to PTC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check PTC.BO's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs RELTD.BO Comparison July 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 715.2B. In comparison, RELTD.BO has a market cap of 34.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,419.40, while RELTD.BO trades at ₹174.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas RELTD.BO's P/E ratio is 38.01. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RELTD.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is less volatile compared to RELTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check RELTD.BO's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs KPEL.BO Comparison July 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 715.2B. In comparison, KPEL.BO has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,419.40, while KPEL.BO trades at ₹328.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas KPEL.BO's P/E ratio is 19.24. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KPEL.BO's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is more volatile compared to KPEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check KPEL.BO's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs UEL.NS Comparison July 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 715.2B. In comparison, UEL.NS has a market cap of 12.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,419.40, while UEL.NS trades at ₹128.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas UEL.NS's P/E ratio is 1745.34. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to UEL.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is less volatile compared to UEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check UEL.NS's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs GREENPOWER.BO Comparison July 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 715.2B. In comparison, GREENPOWER.BO has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,419.40, while GREENPOWER.BO trades at ₹10.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas GREENPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 16.93. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GREENPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is more volatile compared to GREENPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check GREENPOWER.BO's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs GVKPIL.BO Comparison July 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 715.2B. In comparison, GVKPIL.BO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,419.40, while GVKPIL.BO trades at ₹2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas GVKPIL.BO's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GVKPIL.BO's ROE of +1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is more volatile compared to GVKPIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check GVKPIL.BO's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs GVKPIL.NS Comparison July 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 715.2B. In comparison, GVKPIL.NS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,419.40, while GVKPIL.NS trades at ₹2.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas GVKPIL.NS's P/E ratio is -2.85. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GVKPIL.NS's ROE of +1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is less volatile compared to GVKPIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check GVKPIL.NS's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs SURANAT&P.NS Comparison July 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 715.2B. In comparison, SURANAT&P.NS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,419.40, while SURANAT&P.NS trades at ₹18.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas SURANAT&P.NS's P/E ratio is 11.78. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SURANAT&P.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is less volatile compared to SURANAT&P.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check SURANAT&P.NS's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs VENLONENT.BO Comparison July 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 715.2B. In comparison, VENLONENT.BO has a market cap of 191.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,419.40, while VENLONENT.BO trades at ₹3.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas VENLONENT.BO's P/E ratio is -35.82. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VENLONENT.BO's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is less volatile compared to VENLONENT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check VENLONENT.BO's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs JAYCH.BO Comparison July 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 715.2B. In comparison, JAYCH.BO has a market cap of 179.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,419.40, while JAYCH.BO trades at ₹6.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 29.73, whereas JAYCH.BO's P/E ratio is -101.83. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JAYCH.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is less volatile compared to JAYCH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check JAYCH.BO's competition here