Torrent Power Limited (TORNTPOWER.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TORNTPOWER.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Independent Power Producers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TORNTPOWER.NS | ₹1,460.10 | +1.40% | 735.7B | 30.45 | ₹47.95 | +1.37% |
| ADANIPOWER.NS | ₹232.60 | +1.12% | 4.5T | 35.08 | ₹6.63 | N/A |
| ADANIPOWER.BO | ₹232.55 | +1.09% | 4.5T | 35.08 | ₹6.63 | N/A |
| ADANIENSOL.BO | ₹1,579.45 | +3.92% | 1.9T | 85.19 | ₹18.54 | N/A |
| ADANIENSOL.NS | ₹1,579.00 | +3.88% | 1.9T | 85.17 | ₹18.54 | N/A |
| TATAPOWER.NS | ₹409.20 | -0.39% | 1.3T | 34.94 | ₹11.71 | +0.55% |
| TATAPOWER.BO | ₹409.05 | -0.43% | 1.3T | 34.55 | ₹11.84 | +0.55% |
| JSWENERGY.NS | ₹584.20 | -0.99% | 1.1T | 45.78 | ₹12.76 | +0.34% |
| JSWENERGY.BO | ₹583.70 | -1.06% | 1.1T | 45.74 | ₹12.76 | +0.34% |
| ADANITRANS.NS | ₹890.40 | -7.26% | 993.2B | 72.45 | ₹12.29 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
TORNTPOWER.NS vs ADANIPOWER.NS Comparison June 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 735.7B. In comparison, ADANIPOWER.NS has a market cap of 4.5T. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,460.10, while ADANIPOWER.NS trades at ₹232.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.45, whereas ADANIPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 35.08. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ADANIPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is less volatile compared to ADANIPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check ADANIPOWER.NS's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs ADANIPOWER.BO Comparison June 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 735.7B. In comparison, ADANIPOWER.BO has a market cap of 4.5T. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,460.10, while ADANIPOWER.BO trades at ₹232.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.45, whereas ADANIPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 35.08. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ADANIPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is less volatile compared to ADANIPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check ADANIPOWER.BO's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs ADANIENSOL.BO Comparison June 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 735.7B. In comparison, ADANIENSOL.BO has a market cap of 1.9T. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,460.10, while ADANIENSOL.BO trades at ₹1,579.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.45, whereas ADANIENSOL.BO's P/E ratio is 85.19. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ADANIENSOL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is less volatile compared to ADANIENSOL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check ADANIENSOL.BO's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs ADANIENSOL.NS Comparison June 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 735.7B. In comparison, ADANIENSOL.NS has a market cap of 1.9T. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,460.10, while ADANIENSOL.NS trades at ₹1,579.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.45, whereas ADANIENSOL.NS's P/E ratio is 85.17. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ADANIENSOL.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is less volatile compared to ADANIENSOL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check ADANIENSOL.NS's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs TATAPOWER.NS Comparison June 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 735.7B. In comparison, TATAPOWER.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,460.10, while TATAPOWER.NS trades at ₹409.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.45, whereas TATAPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 34.94. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TATAPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is more volatile compared to TATAPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check TATAPOWER.NS's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs TATAPOWER.BO Comparison June 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 735.7B. In comparison, TATAPOWER.BO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,460.10, while TATAPOWER.BO trades at ₹409.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.45, whereas TATAPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 34.55. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TATAPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is more volatile compared to TATAPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check TATAPOWER.BO's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs JSWENERGY.NS Comparison June 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 735.7B. In comparison, JSWENERGY.NS has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,460.10, while JSWENERGY.NS trades at ₹584.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.45, whereas JSWENERGY.NS's P/E ratio is 45.78. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JSWENERGY.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is less volatile compared to JSWENERGY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check JSWENERGY.NS's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs JSWENERGY.BO Comparison June 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 735.7B. In comparison, JSWENERGY.BO has a market cap of 1.1T. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,460.10, while JSWENERGY.BO trades at ₹583.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.45, whereas JSWENERGY.BO's P/E ratio is 45.74. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JSWENERGY.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is less volatile compared to JSWENERGY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check JSWENERGY.BO's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs ADANITRANS.NS Comparison June 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 735.7B. In comparison, ADANITRANS.NS has a market cap of 993.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,460.10, while ADANITRANS.NS trades at ₹890.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.45, whereas ADANITRANS.NS's P/E ratio is 72.45. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ADANITRANS.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is less volatile compared to ADANITRANS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check ADANITRANS.NS's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs TORNTPOWER.BO Comparison June 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 735.7B. In comparison, TORNTPOWER.BO has a market cap of 735.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,460.10, while TORNTPOWER.BO trades at ₹1,459.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.45, whereas TORNTPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 24.36. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TORNTPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is less volatile compared to TORNTPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check TORNTPOWER.BO's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs JPPOWER.BO Comparison June 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 735.7B. In comparison, JPPOWER.BO has a market cap of 130.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,460.10, while JPPOWER.BO trades at ₹19.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.45, whereas JPPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 38.84. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JPPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is less volatile compared to JPPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check JPPOWER.BO's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs JPPOWER.NS Comparison June 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 735.7B. In comparison, JPPOWER.NS has a market cap of 130.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,460.10, while JPPOWER.NS trades at ₹19.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.45, whereas JPPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 38.84. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JPPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is less volatile compared to JPPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check JPPOWER.NS's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs RPOWER.NS Comparison June 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 735.7B. In comparison, RPOWER.NS has a market cap of 118.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,460.10, while RPOWER.NS trades at ₹28.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.45, whereas RPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is -34.87. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RPOWER.NS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is less volatile compared to RPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check RPOWER.NS's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs RPOWER.BO Comparison June 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 735.7B. In comparison, RPOWER.BO has a market cap of 118.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,460.10, while RPOWER.BO trades at ₹28.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.45, whereas RPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is -34.85. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RPOWER.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is less volatile compared to RPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check RPOWER.BO's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs WAAREERTL.BO Comparison June 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 735.7B. In comparison, WAAREERTL.BO has a market cap of 101.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,460.10, while WAAREERTL.BO trades at ₹970.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.45, whereas WAAREERTL.BO's P/E ratio is 21.18. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WAAREERTL.BO's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is less volatile compared to WAAREERTL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check WAAREERTL.BO's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs PTC.NS Comparison June 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 735.7B. In comparison, PTC.NS has a market cap of 54.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,460.10, while PTC.NS trades at ₹184.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.45, whereas PTC.NS's P/E ratio is 9.01. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PTC.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is more volatile compared to PTC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check PTC.NS's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs PTC.BO Comparison June 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 735.7B. In comparison, PTC.BO has a market cap of 54.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,460.10, while PTC.BO trades at ₹184.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.45, whereas PTC.BO's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PTC.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is more volatile compared to PTC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check PTC.BO's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs KPEL.BO Comparison June 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 735.7B. In comparison, KPEL.BO has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,460.10, while KPEL.BO trades at ₹345.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.45, whereas KPEL.BO's P/E ratio is 12.90. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KPEL.BO's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is less volatile compared to KPEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check KPEL.BO's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs RELTD.BO Comparison June 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 735.7B. In comparison, RELTD.BO has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,460.10, while RELTD.BO trades at ₹127.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.45, whereas RELTD.BO's P/E ratio is 28.10. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RELTD.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is less volatile compared to RELTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check RELTD.BO's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs GREENPOWER.BO Comparison June 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 735.7B. In comparison, GREENPOWER.BO has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,460.10, while GREENPOWER.BO trades at ₹11.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.45, whereas GREENPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 19.05. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GREENPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is less volatile compared to GREENPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check GREENPOWER.BO's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs GREENPOWER.NS Comparison June 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 735.7B. In comparison, GREENPOWER.NS has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,460.10, while GREENPOWER.NS trades at ₹11.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.45, whereas GREENPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 19.02. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GREENPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is more volatile compared to GREENPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check GREENPOWER.NS's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs GVKPIL.NS Comparison June 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 735.7B. In comparison, GVKPIL.NS has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,460.10, while GVKPIL.NS trades at ₹3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.45, whereas GVKPIL.NS's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GVKPIL.NS's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is more volatile compared to GVKPIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check GVKPIL.NS's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs GVKPIL.BO Comparison June 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 735.7B. In comparison, GVKPIL.BO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,460.10, while GVKPIL.BO trades at ₹3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.45, whereas GVKPIL.BO's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GVKPIL.BO's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is less volatile compared to GVKPIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check GVKPIL.BO's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs SURANAT&P.NS Comparison June 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 735.7B. In comparison, SURANAT&P.NS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,460.10, while SURANAT&P.NS trades at ₹18.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.45, whereas SURANAT&P.NS's P/E ratio is 11.47. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SURANAT&P.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is less volatile compared to SURANAT&P.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check SURANAT&P.NS's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs VENLONENT.BO Comparison June 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 735.7B. In comparison, VENLONENT.BO has a market cap of 246.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,460.10, while VENLONENT.BO trades at ₹4.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.45, whereas VENLONENT.BO's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VENLONENT.BO's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is less volatile compared to VENLONENT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check VENLONENT.BO's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs JAYCH.BO Comparison June 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 735.7B. In comparison, JAYCH.BO has a market cap of 200M. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,460.10, while JAYCH.BO trades at ₹6.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 30.45, whereas JAYCH.BO's P/E ratio is -227.33. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JAYCH.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is less volatile compared to JAYCH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check JAYCH.BO's competition here