K.P. Energy Limited (KPEL.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KPEL.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Independent Power Producers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KPEL.BO | ₹345.60 | -0.10% | 23B | 12.65 | ₹26.85 | +0.25% |
| ADANIPOWER.BO | ₹226.05 | -2.80% | 4.4T | 34.06 | ₹6.63 | N/A |
| ADANIPOWER.NS | ₹226.14 | -2.78% | 4.4T | 34.06 | ₹6.63 | N/A |
| ADANIENSOL.NS | ₹1,579.20 | +0.01% | 1.9T | 84.29 | ₹18.63 | N/A |
| ADANIENSOL.BO | ₹1,568.90 | -0.67% | 1.9T | 84.22 | ₹18.64 | N/A |
| TATAPOWER.BO | ₹398.60 | -2.55% | 1.3T | 34.15 | ₹11.84 | +0.56% |
| TATAPOWER.NS | ₹398.65 | -2.58% | 1.3T | 34.55 | ₹11.70 | +0.56% |
| JSWENERGY.BO | ₹570.05 | -1.86% | 1T | 44.89 | ₹12.72 | +0.35% |
| JSWENERGY.NS | ₹570.40 | -2.36% | 1T | 44.82 | ₹12.74 | +0.35% |
| ADANITRANS.NS | ₹890.40 | -7.26% | 993.2B | 72.45 | ₹12.29 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
KPEL.BO vs ADANIPOWER.BO Comparison June 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 23B. In comparison, ADANIPOWER.BO has a market cap of 4.4T. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹345.60, while ADANIPOWER.BO trades at ₹226.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.65, whereas ADANIPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 34.06. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.48%, compared to ADANIPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is more volatile compared to ADANIPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check ADANIPOWER.BO's competition here
KPEL.BO vs ADANIPOWER.NS Comparison June 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 23B. In comparison, ADANIPOWER.NS has a market cap of 4.4T. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹345.60, while ADANIPOWER.NS trades at ₹226.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.65, whereas ADANIPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 34.06. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.48%, compared to ADANIPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is more volatile compared to ADANIPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check ADANIPOWER.NS's competition here
KPEL.BO vs ADANIENSOL.NS Comparison June 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 23B. In comparison, ADANIENSOL.NS has a market cap of 1.9T. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹345.60, while ADANIENSOL.NS trades at ₹1,579.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.65, whereas ADANIENSOL.NS's P/E ratio is 84.29. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.48%, compared to ADANIENSOL.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is more volatile compared to ADANIENSOL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check ADANIENSOL.NS's competition here
KPEL.BO vs ADANIENSOL.BO Comparison June 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 23B. In comparison, ADANIENSOL.BO has a market cap of 1.9T. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹345.60, while ADANIENSOL.BO trades at ₹1,568.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.65, whereas ADANIENSOL.BO's P/E ratio is 84.22. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.48%, compared to ADANIENSOL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is more volatile compared to ADANIENSOL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check ADANIENSOL.BO's competition here
KPEL.BO vs TATAPOWER.BO Comparison June 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 23B. In comparison, TATAPOWER.BO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹345.60, while TATAPOWER.BO trades at ₹398.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.65, whereas TATAPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 34.15. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.48%, compared to TATAPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is more volatile compared to TATAPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check TATAPOWER.BO's competition here
KPEL.BO vs TATAPOWER.NS Comparison June 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 23B. In comparison, TATAPOWER.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹345.60, while TATAPOWER.NS trades at ₹398.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.65, whereas TATAPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 34.55. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.48%, compared to TATAPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is more volatile compared to TATAPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check TATAPOWER.NS's competition here
KPEL.BO vs JSWENERGY.BO Comparison June 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 23B. In comparison, JSWENERGY.BO has a market cap of 1T. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹345.60, while JSWENERGY.BO trades at ₹570.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.65, whereas JSWENERGY.BO's P/E ratio is 44.89. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.48%, compared to JSWENERGY.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is more volatile compared to JSWENERGY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check JSWENERGY.BO's competition here
KPEL.BO vs JSWENERGY.NS Comparison June 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 23B. In comparison, JSWENERGY.NS has a market cap of 1T. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹345.60, while JSWENERGY.NS trades at ₹570.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.65, whereas JSWENERGY.NS's P/E ratio is 44.82. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.48%, compared to JSWENERGY.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is more volatile compared to JSWENERGY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check JSWENERGY.NS's competition here
KPEL.BO vs ADANITRANS.NS Comparison June 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 23B. In comparison, ADANITRANS.NS has a market cap of 993.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹345.60, while ADANITRANS.NS trades at ₹890.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.65, whereas ADANITRANS.NS's P/E ratio is 72.45. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.48%, compared to ADANITRANS.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is less volatile compared to ADANITRANS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check ADANITRANS.NS's competition here
KPEL.BO vs TORNTPOWER.NS Comparison June 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 23B. In comparison, TORNTPOWER.NS has a market cap of 732.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹345.60, while TORNTPOWER.NS trades at ₹1,427.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.65, whereas TORNTPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 30.37. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.48%, compared to TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is more volatile compared to TORNTPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check TORNTPOWER.NS's competition here
KPEL.BO vs TORNTPOWER.BO Comparison June 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 23B. In comparison, TORNTPOWER.BO has a market cap of 729.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹345.60, while TORNTPOWER.BO trades at ₹1,428.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.65, whereas TORNTPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 24.18. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.48%, compared to TORNTPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is more volatile compared to TORNTPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check TORNTPOWER.BO's competition here
KPEL.BO vs JPPOWER.BO Comparison June 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 23B. In comparison, JPPOWER.BO has a market cap of 127.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹345.60, while JPPOWER.BO trades at ₹18.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.65, whereas JPPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 37.84. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.48%, compared to JPPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is more volatile compared to JPPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check JPPOWER.BO's competition here
KPEL.BO vs JPPOWER.NS Comparison June 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 23B. In comparison, JPPOWER.NS has a market cap of 126.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹345.60, while JPPOWER.NS trades at ₹18.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.65, whereas JPPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 37.78. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.48%, compared to JPPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is more volatile compared to JPPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check JPPOWER.NS's competition here
KPEL.BO vs RPOWER.NS Comparison June 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 23B. In comparison, RPOWER.NS has a market cap of 112.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹345.60, while RPOWER.NS trades at ₹27.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.65, whereas RPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is -33.23. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.48%, compared to RPOWER.NS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is more volatile compared to RPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check RPOWER.NS's competition here
KPEL.BO vs RPOWER.BO Comparison June 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 23B. In comparison, RPOWER.BO has a market cap of 112.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹345.60, while RPOWER.BO trades at ₹27.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.65, whereas RPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is -33.22. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.48%, compared to RPOWER.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is more volatile compared to RPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check RPOWER.BO's competition here
KPEL.BO vs WAAREERTL.BO Comparison June 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 23B. In comparison, WAAREERTL.BO has a market cap of 98.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹345.60, while WAAREERTL.BO trades at ₹968.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.65, whereas WAAREERTL.BO's P/E ratio is 20.68. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.48%, compared to WAAREERTL.BO's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is more volatile compared to WAAREERTL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check WAAREERTL.BO's competition here
KPEL.BO vs PTC.BO Comparison June 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 23B. In comparison, PTC.BO has a market cap of 57.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹345.60, while PTC.BO trades at ₹187.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.65, whereas PTC.BO's P/E ratio is 9.45. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.48%, compared to PTC.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is more volatile compared to PTC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check PTC.BO's competition here
KPEL.BO vs PTC.NS Comparison June 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 23B. In comparison, PTC.NS has a market cap of 57.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹345.60, while PTC.NS trades at ₹187.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.65, whereas PTC.NS's P/E ratio is 9.43. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.48%, compared to PTC.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is more volatile compared to PTC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check PTC.NS's competition here
KPEL.BO vs RELTD.BO Comparison June 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 23B. In comparison, RELTD.BO has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹345.60, while RELTD.BO trades at ₹128.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.65, whereas RELTD.BO's P/E ratio is 26.90. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.48%, compared to RELTD.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is less volatile compared to RELTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check RELTD.BO's competition here
KPEL.BO vs GREENPOWER.BO Comparison June 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 23B. In comparison, GREENPOWER.BO has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹345.60, while GREENPOWER.BO trades at ₹11.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.65, whereas GREENPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 18.47. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.48%, compared to GREENPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is more volatile compared to GREENPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check GREENPOWER.BO's competition here
KPEL.BO vs GREENPOWER.NS Comparison June 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 23B. In comparison, GREENPOWER.NS has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹345.60, while GREENPOWER.NS trades at ₹11.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.65, whereas GREENPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 18.47. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.48%, compared to GREENPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is more volatile compared to GREENPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check GREENPOWER.NS's competition here
KPEL.BO vs GVKPIL.NS Comparison June 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 23B. In comparison, GVKPIL.NS has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹345.60, while GVKPIL.NS trades at ₹2.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.65, whereas GVKPIL.NS's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.48%, compared to GVKPIL.NS's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is more volatile compared to GVKPIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check GVKPIL.NS's competition here
KPEL.BO vs GVKPIL.BO Comparison June 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 23B. In comparison, GVKPIL.BO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹345.60, while GVKPIL.BO trades at ₹2.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.65, whereas GVKPIL.BO's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.48%, compared to GVKPIL.BO's ROE of +1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is more volatile compared to GVKPIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check GVKPIL.BO's competition here
KPEL.BO vs SURANAT&P.NS Comparison June 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 23B. In comparison, SURANAT&P.NS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹345.60, while SURANAT&P.NS trades at ₹18.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.65, whereas SURANAT&P.NS's P/E ratio is 11.26. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.48%, compared to SURANAT&P.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is less volatile compared to SURANAT&P.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check SURANAT&P.NS's competition here
KPEL.BO vs VENLONENT.BO Comparison June 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 23B. In comparison, VENLONENT.BO has a market cap of 253.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹345.60, while VENLONENT.BO trades at ₹4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.65, whereas VENLONENT.BO's P/E ratio is -1.83. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.48%, compared to VENLONENT.BO's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is less volatile compared to VENLONENT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check VENLONENT.BO's competition here
KPEL.BO vs JAYCH.BO Comparison June 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 23B. In comparison, JAYCH.BO has a market cap of 205M. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹345.60, while JAYCH.BO trades at ₹6.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 12.65, whereas JAYCH.BO's P/E ratio is -233.00. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.48%, compared to JAYCH.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is less volatile compared to JAYCH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check JAYCH.BO's competition here