K.P. Energy Limited (KPEL.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KPEL.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Independent Power Producers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KPEL.BO | ₹323.05 | -2.48% | 21.9B | 18.93 | ₹17.09 | +0.26% |
| ADANIPOWER.BO | ₹219.20 | +1.72% | 4.4T | 34.02 | ₹6.65 | N/A |
| ADANIPOWER.NS | ₹218.97 | +1.63% | 4.4T | 33.76 | ₹6.70 | N/A |
| ADANIENSOL.BO | ₹1,684.00 | +2.45% | 2T | 87.09 | ₹19.41 | N/A |
| ADANIENSOL.NS | ₹1,678.00 | +2.03% | 2T | 84.77 | ₹19.94 | N/A |
| TATAPOWER.NS | ₹380.90 | +0.81% | 1.2T | 32.25 | ₹11.71 | +0.66% |
| TATAPOWER.BO | ₹381.45 | +0.94% | 1.2T | 32.26 | ₹11.70 | +0.66% |
| JSWENERGY.NS | ₹549.90 | -0.68% | 1T | 43.43 | ₹12.83 | +0.36% |
| JSWENERGY.BO | ₹550.10 | -0.59% | 1T | 43.64 | ₹12.77 | +0.36% |
| ADANITRANS.NS | ₹890.40 | -7.26% | 993.2B | 72.45 | ₹12.29 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
KPEL.BO vs ADANIPOWER.BO Comparison July 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 21.9B. In comparison, ADANIPOWER.BO has a market cap of 4.4T. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹323.05, while ADANIPOWER.BO trades at ₹219.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas ADANIPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 34.02. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.46%, compared to ADANIPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is less volatile compared to ADANIPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check ADANIPOWER.BO's competition here
KPEL.BO vs ADANIPOWER.NS Comparison July 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 21.9B. In comparison, ADANIPOWER.NS has a market cap of 4.4T. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹323.05, while ADANIPOWER.NS trades at ₹218.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas ADANIPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 33.76. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.46%, compared to ADANIPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is less volatile compared to ADANIPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check ADANIPOWER.NS's competition here
KPEL.BO vs ADANIENSOL.BO Comparison July 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 21.9B. In comparison, ADANIENSOL.BO has a market cap of 2T. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹323.05, while ADANIENSOL.BO trades at ₹1,684.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas ADANIENSOL.BO's P/E ratio is 87.09. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.46%, compared to ADANIENSOL.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is more volatile compared to ADANIENSOL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check ADANIENSOL.BO's competition here
KPEL.BO vs ADANIENSOL.NS Comparison July 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 21.9B. In comparison, ADANIENSOL.NS has a market cap of 2T. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹323.05, while ADANIENSOL.NS trades at ₹1,678.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas ADANIENSOL.NS's P/E ratio is 84.77. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.46%, compared to ADANIENSOL.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is more volatile compared to ADANIENSOL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check ADANIENSOL.NS's competition here
KPEL.BO vs TATAPOWER.NS Comparison July 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 21.9B. In comparison, TATAPOWER.NS has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹323.05, while TATAPOWER.NS trades at ₹380.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas TATAPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 32.25. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.46%, compared to TATAPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is more volatile compared to TATAPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check TATAPOWER.NS's competition here
KPEL.BO vs TATAPOWER.BO Comparison July 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 21.9B. In comparison, TATAPOWER.BO has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹323.05, while TATAPOWER.BO trades at ₹381.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas TATAPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 32.26. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.46%, compared to TATAPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is more volatile compared to TATAPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check TATAPOWER.BO's competition here
KPEL.BO vs JSWENERGY.NS Comparison July 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 21.9B. In comparison, JSWENERGY.NS has a market cap of 1T. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹323.05, while JSWENERGY.NS trades at ₹549.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas JSWENERGY.NS's P/E ratio is 43.43. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.46%, compared to JSWENERGY.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is more volatile compared to JSWENERGY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check JSWENERGY.NS's competition here
KPEL.BO vs JSWENERGY.BO Comparison July 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 21.9B. In comparison, JSWENERGY.BO has a market cap of 1T. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹323.05, while JSWENERGY.BO trades at ₹550.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas JSWENERGY.BO's P/E ratio is 43.64. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.46%, compared to JSWENERGY.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is more volatile compared to JSWENERGY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check JSWENERGY.BO's competition here
KPEL.BO vs ADANITRANS.NS Comparison July 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 21.9B. In comparison, ADANITRANS.NS has a market cap of 993.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹323.05, while ADANITRANS.NS trades at ₹890.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas ADANITRANS.NS's P/E ratio is 72.45. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.46%, compared to ADANITRANS.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is less volatile compared to ADANITRANS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check ADANITRANS.NS's competition here
KPEL.BO vs TORNTPOWER.NS Comparison July 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 21.9B. In comparison, TORNTPOWER.NS has a market cap of 738.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹323.05, while TORNTPOWER.NS trades at ₹1,441.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas TORNTPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 30.69. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.46%, compared to TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is less volatile compared to TORNTPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check TORNTPOWER.NS's competition here
KPEL.BO vs TORNTPOWER.BO Comparison July 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 21.9B. In comparison, TORNTPOWER.BO has a market cap of 738.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹323.05, while TORNTPOWER.BO trades at ₹1,436.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas TORNTPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 31.39. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.46%, compared to TORNTPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is less volatile compared to TORNTPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check TORNTPOWER.BO's competition here
KPEL.BO vs JPPOWER.BO Comparison July 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 21.9B. In comparison, JPPOWER.BO has a market cap of 114.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹323.05, while JPPOWER.BO trades at ₹16.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas JPPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 25.27. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.46%, compared to JPPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is less volatile compared to JPPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check JPPOWER.BO's competition here
KPEL.BO vs JPPOWER.NS Comparison July 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 21.9B. In comparison, JPPOWER.NS has a market cap of 114.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹323.05, while JPPOWER.NS trades at ₹16.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas JPPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 40.51. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.46%, compared to JPPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is less volatile compared to JPPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check JPPOWER.NS's competition here
KPEL.BO vs WAAREERTL.BO Comparison July 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 21.9B. In comparison, WAAREERTL.BO has a market cap of 103.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹323.05, while WAAREERTL.BO trades at ₹993.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas WAAREERTL.BO's P/E ratio is 18.40. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.46%, compared to WAAREERTL.BO's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is more volatile compared to WAAREERTL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check WAAREERTL.BO's competition here
KPEL.BO vs RPOWER.BO Comparison July 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 21.9B. In comparison, RPOWER.BO has a market cap of 101.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹323.05, while RPOWER.BO trades at ₹24.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas RPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is -30.33. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.46%, compared to RPOWER.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is more volatile compared to RPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check RPOWER.BO's competition here
KPEL.BO vs RPOWER.NS Comparison July 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 21.9B. In comparison, RPOWER.NS has a market cap of 101.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹323.05, while RPOWER.NS trades at ₹24.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas RPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is -38.06. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.46%, compared to RPOWER.NS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is more volatile compared to RPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check RPOWER.NS's competition here
KPEL.BO vs PTC.NS Comparison July 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 21.9B. In comparison, PTC.NS has a market cap of 51.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹323.05, while PTC.NS trades at ₹173.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas PTC.NS's P/E ratio is 8.49. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.46%, compared to PTC.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is more volatile compared to PTC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check PTC.NS's competition here
KPEL.BO vs PTC.BO Comparison July 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 21.9B. In comparison, PTC.BO has a market cap of 51.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹323.05, while PTC.BO trades at ₹173.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas PTC.BO's P/E ratio is 8.49. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.46%, compared to PTC.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is more volatile compared to PTC.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check PTC.BO's competition here
KPEL.BO vs RELTD.BO Comparison July 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 21.9B. In comparison, RELTD.BO has a market cap of 34.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹323.05, while RELTD.BO trades at ₹174.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas RELTD.BO's P/E ratio is 37.90. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.46%, compared to RELTD.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is less volatile compared to RELTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check RELTD.BO's competition here
KPEL.BO vs UEL.NS Comparison July 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 21.9B. In comparison, UEL.NS has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹323.05, while UEL.NS trades at ₹129.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas UEL.NS's P/E ratio is 1731.61. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.46%, compared to UEL.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is less volatile compared to UEL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check UEL.NS's competition here
KPEL.BO vs GREENPOWER.BO Comparison July 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 21.9B. In comparison, GREENPOWER.BO has a market cap of 11.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹323.05, while GREENPOWER.BO trades at ₹10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas GREENPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 16.67. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.46%, compared to GREENPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is more volatile compared to GREENPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check GREENPOWER.BO's competition here
KPEL.BO vs GVKPIL.NS Comparison July 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 21.9B. In comparison, GVKPIL.NS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹323.05, while GVKPIL.NS trades at ₹2.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas GVKPIL.NS's P/E ratio is -2.85. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.46%, compared to GVKPIL.NS's ROE of +1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is more volatile compared to GVKPIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check GVKPIL.NS's competition here
KPEL.BO vs GVKPIL.BO Comparison July 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 21.9B. In comparison, GVKPIL.BO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹323.05, while GVKPIL.BO trades at ₹2.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas GVKPIL.BO's P/E ratio is -0.47. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.46%, compared to GVKPIL.BO's ROE of +1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is less volatile compared to GVKPIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check GVKPIL.BO's competition here
KPEL.BO vs SURANAT&P.NS Comparison July 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 21.9B. In comparison, SURANAT&P.NS has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹323.05, while SURANAT&P.NS trades at ₹18.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas SURANAT&P.NS's P/E ratio is 11.54. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.46%, compared to SURANAT&P.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is less volatile compared to SURANAT&P.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check SURANAT&P.NS's competition here
KPEL.BO vs VENLONENT.BO Comparison July 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 21.9B. In comparison, VENLONENT.BO has a market cap of 185.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹323.05, while VENLONENT.BO trades at ₹3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas VENLONENT.BO's P/E ratio is -34.74. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.46%, compared to VENLONENT.BO's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is less volatile compared to VENLONENT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check VENLONENT.BO's competition here
KPEL.BO vs JAYCH.BO Comparison July 2026
KPEL.BO plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KPEL.BO stands at 21.9B. In comparison, JAYCH.BO has a market cap of 172.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KPEL.BO is priced at ₹323.05, while JAYCH.BO trades at ₹5.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KPEL.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 18.93, whereas JAYCH.BO's P/E ratio is -98.00. In terms of profitability, KPEL.BO's ROE is +0.46%, compared to JAYCH.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KPEL.BO is less volatile compared to JAYCH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KPEL.BO.Check JAYCH.BO's competition here