Torrent Power Limited
Torrent Power Limited (TORNTPOWER.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TORNTPOWER.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Independent Power Producers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TORNTPOWER.NS | ₹1,454.30 | +0.76% | 732.8B | 23.11 | ₹62.93 | +1.38% |
| NTPC.NS | ₹378.50 | -1.27% | 3.7T | 20.96 | ₹18.06 | +2.34% |
| ADANIPOWER.BO | ₹154.10 | -0.90% | 3T | 26.25 | ₹5.87 | N/A |
| ADANIPOWER.NS | ₹154.07 | -0.98% | 3T | 25.01 | ₹6.16 | N/A |
| TATAPOWER.BO | ₹400.60 | -0.05% | 1.3T | 33.83 | ₹11.84 | +0.56% |
| TATAPOWER.NS | ₹400.35 | -0.12% | 1.3T | 33.73 | ₹11.87 | +0.56% |
| ADANIENSOL.BO | ₹1,036.75 | +3.59% | 1.2T | 55.71 | ₹18.61 | N/A |
| ADANIENSOL.NS | ₹1,036.70 | +3.61% | 1.2T | 55.71 | ₹18.61 | N/A |
| ADANITRANS.NS | ₹890.40 | -7.26% | 993.2B | 72.45 | ₹12.29 | N/A |
| JSWENERGY.NS | ₹509.10 | +0.65% | 894B | 39.68 | ₹12.83 | +0.39% |
Stock Comparison
TORNTPOWER.NS vs NTPC.NS Comparison March 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 732.8B. In comparison, NTPC.NS has a market cap of 3.7T. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,454.30, while NTPC.NS trades at ₹378.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.11, whereas NTPC.NS's P/E ratio is 20.96. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NTPC.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is more volatile compared to NTPC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check NTPC.NS's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs ADANIPOWER.BO Comparison March 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 732.8B. In comparison, ADANIPOWER.BO has a market cap of 3T. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,454.30, while ADANIPOWER.BO trades at ₹154.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.11, whereas ADANIPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 26.25. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ADANIPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is less volatile compared to ADANIPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check ADANIPOWER.BO's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs ADANIPOWER.NS Comparison March 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 732.8B. In comparison, ADANIPOWER.NS has a market cap of 3T. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,454.30, while ADANIPOWER.NS trades at ₹154.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.11, whereas ADANIPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 25.01. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ADANIPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is less volatile compared to ADANIPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check ADANIPOWER.NS's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs TATAPOWER.BO Comparison March 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 732.8B. In comparison, TATAPOWER.BO has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,454.30, while TATAPOWER.BO trades at ₹400.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.11, whereas TATAPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 33.83. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TATAPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is more volatile compared to TATAPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check TATAPOWER.BO's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs TATAPOWER.NS Comparison March 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 732.8B. In comparison, TATAPOWER.NS has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,454.30, while TATAPOWER.NS trades at ₹400.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.11, whereas TATAPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 33.73. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TATAPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is more volatile compared to TATAPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check TATAPOWER.NS's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs ADANIENSOL.BO Comparison March 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 732.8B. In comparison, ADANIENSOL.BO has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,454.30, while ADANIENSOL.BO trades at ₹1,036.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.11, whereas ADANIENSOL.BO's P/E ratio is 55.71. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ADANIENSOL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is less volatile compared to ADANIENSOL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check ADANIENSOL.BO's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs ADANIENSOL.NS Comparison March 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 732.8B. In comparison, ADANIENSOL.NS has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,454.30, while ADANIENSOL.NS trades at ₹1,036.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.11, whereas ADANIENSOL.NS's P/E ratio is 55.71. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ADANIENSOL.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is less volatile compared to ADANIENSOL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check ADANIENSOL.NS's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs ADANITRANS.NS Comparison March 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 732.8B. In comparison, ADANITRANS.NS has a market cap of 993.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,454.30, while ADANITRANS.NS trades at ₹890.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.11, whereas ADANITRANS.NS's P/E ratio is 72.45. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ADANITRANS.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is less volatile compared to ADANITRANS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check ADANITRANS.NS's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs JSWENERGY.NS Comparison March 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 732.8B. In comparison, JSWENERGY.NS has a market cap of 894B. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,454.30, while JSWENERGY.NS trades at ₹509.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.11, whereas JSWENERGY.NS's P/E ratio is 39.68. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JSWENERGY.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is more volatile compared to JSWENERGY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check JSWENERGY.NS's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs JSWENERGY.BO Comparison March 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 732.8B. In comparison, JSWENERGY.BO has a market cap of 893.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,454.30, while JSWENERGY.BO trades at ₹509.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.11, whereas JSWENERGY.BO's P/E ratio is 39.09. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JSWENERGY.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is more volatile compared to JSWENERGY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check JSWENERGY.BO's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs TORNTPOWER.BO Comparison March 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 732.8B. In comparison, TORNTPOWER.BO has a market cap of 732.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,454.30, while TORNTPOWER.BO trades at ₹1,453.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.11, whereas TORNTPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 24.27. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TORNTPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is more volatile compared to TORNTPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check TORNTPOWER.BO's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs CESC.NS Comparison March 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 732.8B. In comparison, CESC.NS has a market cap of 207.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,454.30, while CESC.NS trades at ₹156.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.11, whereas CESC.NS's P/E ratio is 14.05. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CESC.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is more volatile compared to CESC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check CESC.NS's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs JPPOWER.NS Comparison March 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 732.8B. In comparison, JPPOWER.NS has a market cap of 102.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,454.30, while JPPOWER.NS trades at ₹15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.11, whereas JPPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 22.73. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JPPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is less volatile compared to JPPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check JPPOWER.NS's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs JPPOWER.BO Comparison March 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 732.8B. In comparison, JPPOWER.BO has a market cap of 102.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,454.30, while JPPOWER.BO trades at ₹15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.11, whereas JPPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 22.73. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JPPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is less volatile compared to JPPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check JPPOWER.BO's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs RPOWER.BO Comparison March 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 732.8B. In comparison, RPOWER.BO has a market cap of 94B. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,454.30, while RPOWER.BO trades at ₹22.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.11, whereas RPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 32.96. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is less volatile compared to RPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check RPOWER.BO's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs RPOWER.NS Comparison March 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 732.8B. In comparison, RPOWER.NS has a market cap of 94B. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,454.30, while RPOWER.NS trades at ₹22.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.11, whereas RPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 32.96. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is less volatile compared to RPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check RPOWER.NS's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs WAAREERTL.BO Comparison March 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 732.8B. In comparison, WAAREERTL.BO has a market cap of 90.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,454.30, while WAAREERTL.BO trades at ₹864.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.11, whereas WAAREERTL.BO's P/E ratio is 21.62. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WAAREERTL.BO's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is less volatile compared to WAAREERTL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check WAAREERTL.BO's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs PTC.NS Comparison March 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 732.8B. In comparison, PTC.NS has a market cap of 48.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,454.30, while PTC.NS trades at ₹163.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.11, whereas PTC.NS's P/E ratio is 5.75. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PTC.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is less volatile compared to PTC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check PTC.NS's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs PTC.BO Comparison March 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 732.8B. In comparison, PTC.BO has a market cap of 48.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,454.30, while PTC.BO trades at ₹163.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.11, whereas PTC.BO's P/E ratio is 5.75. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PTC.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is less volatile compared to PTC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check PTC.BO's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs RTNINDIA.NS Comparison March 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 732.8B. In comparison, RTNINDIA.NS has a market cap of 38.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,454.30, while RTNINDIA.NS trades at ₹27.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.11, whereas RTNINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is -9.31. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RTNINDIA.NS's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is less volatile compared to RTNINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check RTNINDIA.NS's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs RELINFRA.BO Comparison March 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 732.8B. In comparison, RELINFRA.BO has a market cap of 32.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,454.30, while RELINFRA.BO trades at ₹79.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.11, whereas RELINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 0.51. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RELINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is less volatile compared to RELINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check RELINFRA.BO's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs RELTD.BO Comparison March 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 732.8B. In comparison, RELTD.BO has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,454.30, while RELTD.BO trades at ₹136.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.11, whereas RELTD.BO's P/E ratio is 29.84. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RELTD.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is less volatile compared to RELTD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check RELTD.BO's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs KPEL.BO Comparison March 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 732.8B. In comparison, KPEL.BO has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,454.30, while KPEL.BO trades at ₹280.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.11, whereas KPEL.BO's P/E ratio is 12.70. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KPEL.BO's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is less volatile compared to KPEL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check KPEL.BO's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs GREENPOWER.NS Comparison March 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 732.8B. In comparison, GREENPOWER.NS has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,454.30, while GREENPOWER.NS trades at ₹9.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.11, whereas GREENPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 15.40. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GREENPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is less volatile compared to GREENPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check GREENPOWER.NS's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs GREENPOWER.BO Comparison March 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 732.8B. In comparison, GREENPOWER.BO has a market cap of 11.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,454.30, while GREENPOWER.BO trades at ₹9.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.11, whereas GREENPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 15.39. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GREENPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is less volatile compared to GREENPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check GREENPOWER.BO's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs GVKPIL.BO Comparison March 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 732.8B. In comparison, GVKPIL.BO has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,454.30, while GVKPIL.BO trades at ₹2.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.11, whereas GVKPIL.BO's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GVKPIL.BO's ROE of -7.98%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is less volatile compared to GVKPIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check GVKPIL.BO's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs SURANAT&P.NS Comparison March 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 732.8B. In comparison, SURANAT&P.NS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,454.30, while SURANAT&P.NS trades at ₹17.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.11, whereas SURANAT&P.NS's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SURANAT&P.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is less volatile compared to SURANAT&P.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check SURANAT&P.NS's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs VENLONENT.BO Comparison March 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 732.8B. In comparison, VENLONENT.BO has a market cap of 240.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,454.30, while VENLONENT.BO trades at ₹4.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.11, whereas VENLONENT.BO's P/E ratio is -1.74. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VENLONENT.BO's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is less volatile compared to VENLONENT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check VENLONENT.BO's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs JAYCH.BO Comparison March 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 732.8B. In comparison, JAYCH.BO has a market cap of 172.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,454.30, while JAYCH.BO trades at ₹5.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 23.11, whereas JAYCH.BO's P/E ratio is -196.00. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JAYCH.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is less volatile compared to JAYCH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check JAYCH.BO's competition here