Torrent Power Limited
Torrent Power Limited (TORNTPOWER.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TORNTPOWER.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Independent Power Producers Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TORNTPOWER.NS | ₹1,541.80 | +0.00% | 789B | 24.86 | ₹62.98 | +1.28% |
| NTPC.NS | ₹382.75 | +0.00% | 3.7T | 21.28 | ₹18.09 | +2.30% |
| ADANIPOWER.NS | ₹144.31 | +0.00% | 2.7T | 23.98 | ₹5.86 | N/A |
| ADANIPOWER.BO | ₹144.20 | +0.00% | 2.7T | 23.98 | ₹5.86 | N/A |
| TATAPOWER.NS | ₹379.75 | +0.00% | 1.2T | 32.12 | ₹11.87 | +0.59% |
| TATAPOWER.BO | ₹379.75 | +0.00% | 1.2T | 32.20 | ₹11.84 | +0.59% |
| ADANIENSOL.NS | ₹1,037.10 | +0.00% | 1.2T | 54.55 | ₹18.57 | N/A |
| ADANIENSOL.BO | ₹1,037.50 | +0.00% | 1.2T | 54.51 | ₹18.57 | N/A |
| ADANITRANS.NS | ₹890.40 | -7.26% | 993.2B | 72.45 | ₹12.29 | N/A |
| JSWENERGY.NS | ₹490.25 | +0.00% | 856.5B | 37.58 | ₹13.04 | +0.41% |
Stock Comparison
TORNTPOWER.NS vs NTPC.NS Comparison February 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 789B. In comparison, NTPC.NS has a market cap of 3.7T. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,541.80, while NTPC.NS trades at ₹382.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas NTPC.NS's P/E ratio is 21.28. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to NTPC.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is less volatile compared to NTPC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check NTPC.NS's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs ADANIPOWER.NS Comparison February 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 789B. In comparison, ADANIPOWER.NS has a market cap of 2.7T. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,541.80, while ADANIPOWER.NS trades at ₹144.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas ADANIPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 23.98. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ADANIPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is more volatile compared to ADANIPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check ADANIPOWER.NS's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs ADANIPOWER.BO Comparison February 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 789B. In comparison, ADANIPOWER.BO has a market cap of 2.7T. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,541.80, while ADANIPOWER.BO trades at ₹144.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas ADANIPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 23.98. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ADANIPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is more volatile compared to ADANIPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check ADANIPOWER.BO's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs TATAPOWER.NS Comparison February 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 789B. In comparison, TATAPOWER.NS has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,541.80, while TATAPOWER.NS trades at ₹379.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas TATAPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 32.12. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TATAPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is more volatile compared to TATAPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check TATAPOWER.NS's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs TATAPOWER.BO Comparison February 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 789B. In comparison, TATAPOWER.BO has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,541.80, while TATAPOWER.BO trades at ₹379.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas TATAPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 32.20. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TATAPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is more volatile compared to TATAPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check TATAPOWER.BO's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs ADANIENSOL.NS Comparison February 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 789B. In comparison, ADANIENSOL.NS has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,541.80, while ADANIENSOL.NS trades at ₹1,037.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas ADANIENSOL.NS's P/E ratio is 54.55. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ADANIENSOL.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is less volatile compared to ADANIENSOL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check ADANIENSOL.NS's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs ADANIENSOL.BO Comparison February 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 789B. In comparison, ADANIENSOL.BO has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,541.80, while ADANIENSOL.BO trades at ₹1,037.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas ADANIENSOL.BO's P/E ratio is 54.51. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ADANIENSOL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is less volatile compared to ADANIENSOL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check ADANIENSOL.BO's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs ADANITRANS.NS Comparison February 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 789B. In comparison, ADANITRANS.NS has a market cap of 993.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,541.80, while ADANITRANS.NS trades at ₹890.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas ADANITRANS.NS's P/E ratio is 72.45. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to ADANITRANS.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is less volatile compared to ADANITRANS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check ADANITRANS.NS's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs JSWENERGY.NS Comparison February 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 789B. In comparison, JSWENERGY.NS has a market cap of 856.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,541.80, while JSWENERGY.NS trades at ₹490.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas JSWENERGY.NS's P/E ratio is 37.58. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JSWENERGY.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is more volatile compared to JSWENERGY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check JSWENERGY.NS's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs JSWENERGY.BO Comparison February 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 789B. In comparison, JSWENERGY.BO has a market cap of 855.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,541.80, while JSWENERGY.BO trades at ₹489.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas JSWENERGY.BO's P/E ratio is 37.58. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JSWENERGY.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is less volatile compared to JSWENERGY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check JSWENERGY.BO's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs TORNTPOWER.BO Comparison February 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 789B. In comparison, TORNTPOWER.BO has a market cap of 789.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,541.80, while TORNTPOWER.BO trades at ₹1,540.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas TORNTPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 26.14. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to TORNTPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is less volatile compared to TORNTPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check TORNTPOWER.BO's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs CESC.NS Comparison February 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 789B. In comparison, CESC.NS has a market cap of 212.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,541.80, while CESC.NS trades at ₹155.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas CESC.NS's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to CESC.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is more volatile compared to CESC.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check CESC.NS's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs RPOWER.NS Comparison February 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 789B. In comparison, RPOWER.NS has a market cap of 105.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,541.80, while RPOWER.NS trades at ₹25.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas RPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 37.01. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is less volatile compared to RPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check RPOWER.NS's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs RPOWER.BO Comparison February 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 789B. In comparison, RPOWER.BO has a market cap of 105.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,541.80, while RPOWER.BO trades at ₹25.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas RPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 37.01. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is less volatile compared to RPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check RPOWER.BO's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs JPPOWER.BO Comparison February 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 789B. In comparison, JPPOWER.BO has a market cap of 100.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,541.80, while JPPOWER.BO trades at ₹14.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas JPPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 22.26. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JPPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is more volatile compared to JPPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check JPPOWER.BO's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs JPPOWER.NS Comparison February 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 789B. In comparison, JPPOWER.NS has a market cap of 100.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,541.80, while JPPOWER.NS trades at ₹14.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas JPPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 22.24. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JPPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is more volatile compared to JPPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check JPPOWER.NS's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs WAAREERTL.BO Comparison February 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 789B. In comparison, WAAREERTL.BO has a market cap of 87.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,541.80, while WAAREERTL.BO trades at ₹865.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas WAAREERTL.BO's P/E ratio is 20.99. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to WAAREERTL.BO's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is more volatile compared to WAAREERTL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check WAAREERTL.BO's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs PTC.BO Comparison February 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 789B. In comparison, PTC.BO has a market cap of 49B. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,541.80, while PTC.BO trades at ₹165.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas PTC.BO's P/E ratio is 5.81. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PTC.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is less volatile compared to PTC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check PTC.BO's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs PTC.NS Comparison February 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 789B. In comparison, PTC.NS has a market cap of 49B. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,541.80, while PTC.NS trades at ₹165.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas PTC.NS's P/E ratio is 5.81. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to PTC.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is less volatile compared to PTC.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check PTC.NS's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs RTNINDIA.NS Comparison February 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 789B. In comparison, RTNINDIA.NS has a market cap of 41.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,541.80, while RTNINDIA.NS trades at ₹30.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas RTNINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is -10.00. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RTNINDIA.NS's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is less volatile compared to RTNINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check RTNINDIA.NS's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs RELINFRA.BO Comparison February 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 789B. In comparison, RELINFRA.BO has a market cap of 39.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,541.80, while RELINFRA.BO trades at ₹94.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas RELINFRA.BO's P/E ratio is 0.63. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RELINFRA.BO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is less volatile compared to RELINFRA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check RELINFRA.BO's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs RELTD.BO Comparison February 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 789B. In comparison, RELTD.BO has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,541.80, while RELTD.BO trades at ₹144.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas RELTD.BO's P/E ratio is 31.75. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to RELTD.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is more volatile compared to RELTD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check RELTD.BO's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs KPEL.BO Comparison February 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 789B. In comparison, KPEL.BO has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,541.80, while KPEL.BO trades at ₹288.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas KPEL.BO's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to KPEL.BO's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is more volatile compared to KPEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check KPEL.BO's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs GREENPOWER.BO Comparison February 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 789B. In comparison, GREENPOWER.BO has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,541.80, while GREENPOWER.BO trades at ₹9.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas GREENPOWER.BO's P/E ratio is 15.89. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GREENPOWER.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is less volatile compared to GREENPOWER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check GREENPOWER.BO's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs GREENPOWER.NS Comparison February 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 789B. In comparison, GREENPOWER.NS has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,541.80, while GREENPOWER.NS trades at ₹9.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas GREENPOWER.NS's P/E ratio is 15.87. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GREENPOWER.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is less volatile compared to GREENPOWER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check GREENPOWER.NS's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs GVKPIL.BO Comparison February 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 789B. In comparison, GVKPIL.BO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,541.80, while GVKPIL.BO trades at ₹2.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas GVKPIL.BO's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to GVKPIL.BO's ROE of -7.98%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is more volatile compared to GVKPIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check GVKPIL.BO's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs SURANAT&P.NS Comparison February 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 789B. In comparison, SURANAT&P.NS has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,541.80, while SURANAT&P.NS trades at ₹18.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas SURANAT&P.NS's P/E ratio is 9.53. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to SURANAT&P.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is less volatile compared to SURANAT&P.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check SURANAT&P.NS's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs VENLONENT.BO Comparison February 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 789B. In comparison, VENLONENT.BO has a market cap of 303M. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,541.80, while VENLONENT.BO trades at ₹6.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas VENLONENT.BO's P/E ratio is -2.22. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to VENLONENT.BO's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is more volatile compared to VENLONENT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check VENLONENT.BO's competition here
TORNTPOWER.NS vs JAYCH.BO Comparison February 2026
TORNTPOWER.NS plays a significant role within the Utilities sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TORNTPOWER.NS stands at 789B. In comparison, JAYCH.BO has a market cap of 189.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TORNTPOWER.NS is priced at ₹1,541.80, while JAYCH.BO trades at ₹6.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TORNTPOWER.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas JAYCH.BO's P/E ratio is -215.67. In terms of profitability, TORNTPOWER.NS's ROE is +0.18%, compared to JAYCH.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TORNTPOWER.NS is less volatile compared to JAYCH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TORNTPOWER.NS.Check JAYCH.BO's competition here