Ten Pao Group Holdings Limited
Ten Pao Group Holdings Limited (TNPOF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TNPOF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Electrical Equipment & Parts Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TNPOF | $0.11 | +0.00% | 115.4M | 2.80 | $0.04 | +12.80% |
| ABLZF | $66.76 | -0.56% | 121.9B | 29.28 | $2.28 | +1.53% |
| ABBNY | $65.46 | -0.58% | 120B | 28.63 | $2.28 | +1.51% |
| DLEGF | $4.00 | +0.00% | 53.9B | 80.00 | $0.05 | +0.34% |
| MIELF | $22.13 | +5.63% | 46.9B | 21.34 | $1.06 | +1.49% |
| MIELY | $43.66 | +0.07% | 45.3B | 20.67 | $2.11 | +1.07% |
| LGRVF | $149.84 | +0.00% | 39.3B | 28.43 | $5.27 | +1.53% |
| LGRDY | $29.10 | -0.85% | 38.4B | 27.62 | $1.06 | +1.64% |
| PRYMF | $80.79 | +3.78% | 23.2B | 28.65 | $2.82 | +1.12% |
| PRYMY | $39.18 | +1.40% | 22.5B | 27.73 | $1.41 | +1.16% |
Stock Comparison
TNPOF vs ABLZF Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, ABLZF has a market cap of 121.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while ABLZF trades at $66.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas ABLZF's P/E ratio is 29.28. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ABLZF's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is more volatile compared to ABLZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check ABLZF's competition here
TNPOF vs ABBNY Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, ABBNY has a market cap of 120B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while ABBNY trades at $65.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas ABBNY's P/E ratio is 28.63. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ABBNY's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is less volatile compared to ABBNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check ABBNY's competition here
TNPOF vs DLEGF Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, DLEGF has a market cap of 53.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while DLEGF trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas DLEGF's P/E ratio is 80.00. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DLEGF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is less volatile compared to DLEGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check DLEGF's competition here
TNPOF vs MIELF Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, MIELF has a market cap of 46.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while MIELF trades at $22.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas MIELF's P/E ratio is 21.34. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MIELF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is less volatile compared to MIELF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check MIELF's competition here
TNPOF vs MIELY Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, MIELY has a market cap of 45.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while MIELY trades at $43.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas MIELY's P/E ratio is 20.67. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MIELY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is less volatile compared to MIELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check MIELY's competition here
TNPOF vs LGRVF Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, LGRVF has a market cap of 39.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while LGRVF trades at $149.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas LGRVF's P/E ratio is 28.43. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LGRVF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is more volatile compared to LGRVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check LGRVF's competition here
TNPOF vs LGRDY Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, LGRDY has a market cap of 38.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while LGRDY trades at $29.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas LGRDY's P/E ratio is 27.62. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LGRDY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is less volatile compared to LGRDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check LGRDY's competition here
TNPOF vs PRYMF Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, PRYMF has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while PRYMF trades at $80.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas PRYMF's P/E ratio is 28.65. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PRYMF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is less volatile compared to PRYMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check PRYMF's competition here
TNPOF vs PRYMY Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, PRYMY has a market cap of 22.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while PRYMY trades at $39.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas PRYMY's P/E ratio is 27.73. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PRYMY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is less volatile compared to PRYMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check PRYMY's competition here
TNPOF vs OSAGY Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, OSAGY has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while OSAGY trades at $51.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas OSAGY's P/E ratio is -26.34. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OSAGY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is more volatile compared to OSAGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check OSAGY's competition here
TNPOF vs FELTY Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, FELTY has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while FELTY trades at $12.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas FELTY's P/E ratio is 11.66. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FELTY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is less volatile compared to FELTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check FELTY's competition here
TNPOF vs FELTF Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, FELTF has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while FELTF trades at $45.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas FELTF's P/E ratio is 10.42. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FELTF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is less volatile compared to FELTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check FELTF's competition here
TNPOF vs PHPPY Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, PHPPY has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while PHPPY trades at $13.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas PHPPY's P/E ratio is 8.38. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PHPPY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is more volatile compared to PHPPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check PHPPY's competition here
TNPOF vs NEXNY Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, NEXNY has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while NEXNY trades at $72.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas NEXNY's P/E ratio is 19.97. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NEXNY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is more volatile compared to NEXNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check NEXNY's competition here
TNPOF vs NXPRF Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, NXPRF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while NXPRF trades at $138.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas NXPRF's P/E ratio is 19.09. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NXPRF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is more volatile compared to NXPRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check NXPRF's competition here
TNPOF vs YASKF Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, YASKF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while YASKF trades at $21.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas YASKF's P/E ratio is 15.31. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to YASKF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is more volatile compared to YASKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check YASKF's competition here
TNPOF vs OSAGF Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, OSAGF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while OSAGF trades at $53.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas OSAGF's P/E ratio is -157.35. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OSAGF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is more volatile compared to OSAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check OSAGF's competition here
TNPOF vs NRKBF Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, NRKBF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while NRKBF trades at $81.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas NRKBF's P/E ratio is 15.67. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NRKBF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is more volatile compared to NRKBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check NRKBF's competition here
TNPOF vs FUWAY Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, FUWAY has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while FUWAY trades at $27.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas FUWAY's P/E ratio is 16.92. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FUWAY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is more volatile compared to FUWAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check FUWAY's competition here
TNPOF vs FUWAF Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, FUWAF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while FUWAF trades at $49.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas FUWAF's P/E ratio is 15.50. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FUWAF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is more volatile compared to FUWAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check FUWAF's competition here
TNPOF vs SFFYF Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, SFFYF has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while SFFYF trades at $25.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas SFFYF's P/E ratio is 8.12. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SFFYF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is less volatile compared to SFFYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check SFFYF's competition here
TNPOF vs LMHDF Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, LMHDF has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while LMHDF trades at $2,548.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas LMHDF's P/E ratio is 40.16. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LMHDF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is more volatile compared to LMHDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check LMHDF's competition here
TNPOF vs YASKY Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, YASKY has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while YASKY trades at $42.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas YASKY's P/E ratio is 14.91. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to YASKY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is less volatile compared to YASKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check YASKY's competition here
TNPOF vs LDGYY Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, LDGYY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while LDGYY trades at $16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas LDGYY's P/E ratio is -22.62. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LDGYY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is less volatile compared to LDGYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check LDGYY's competition here
TNPOF vs LGYRF Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, LGYRF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while LGYRF trades at $61.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas LGYRF's P/E ratio is -20.76. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LGYRF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is less volatile compared to LGYRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check LGYRF's competition here
TNPOF vs GYUAF Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, GYUAF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while GYUAF trades at $17.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas GYUAF's P/E ratio is 8.54. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GYUAF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is less volatile compared to GYUAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check GYUAF's competition here
TNPOF vs HMDPF Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, HMDPF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while HMDPF trades at $84.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas HMDPF's P/E ratio is 17.22. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HMDPF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is more volatile compared to HMDPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check HMDPF's competition here
TNPOF vs VLXGF Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, VLXGF has a market cap of 893.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while VLXGF trades at $4.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas VLXGF's P/E ratio is 18.69. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VLXGF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is less volatile compared to VLXGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check VLXGF's competition here
TNPOF vs VARGF Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, VARGF has a market cap of 861.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while VARGF trades at $20.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas VARGF's P/E ratio is -2.59. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VARGF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is more volatile compared to VARGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check VARGF's competition here
TNPOF vs HOIEF Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, HOIEF has a market cap of 633M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while HOIEF trades at $12.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas HOIEF's P/E ratio is 8.82. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HOIEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is less volatile compared to HOIEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check HOIEF's competition here
TNPOF vs EFLVF Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, EFLVF has a market cap of 591.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while EFLVF trades at $3.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas EFLVF's P/E ratio is -179.50. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EFLVF's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is less volatile compared to EFLVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check EFLVF's competition here
TNPOF vs CBLNF Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, CBLNF has a market cap of 586.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while CBLNF trades at $24.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas CBLNF's P/E ratio is 8.96. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CBLNF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is less volatile compared to CBLNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check CBLNF's competition here
TNPOF vs CBLNY Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, CBLNY has a market cap of 561.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while CBLNY trades at $4.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas CBLNY's P/E ratio is 8.70. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CBLNY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is less volatile compared to CBLNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check CBLNY's competition here
TNPOF vs WSPCF Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, WSPCF has a market cap of 536.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while WSPCF trades at $9.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas WSPCF's P/E ratio is 30.50. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WSPCF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is less volatile compared to WSPCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check WSPCF's competition here
TNPOF vs RNRTY Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, RNRTY has a market cap of 513.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while RNRTY trades at $6.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas RNRTY's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RNRTY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is more volatile compared to RNRTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check RNRTY's competition here
TNPOF vs ZMTBY Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, ZMTBY has a market cap of 414.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while ZMTBY trades at $2.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas ZMTBY's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ZMTBY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is less volatile compared to ZMTBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check ZMTBY's competition here
TNPOF vs CRPHY Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, CRPHY has a market cap of 367.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while CRPHY trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas CRPHY's P/E ratio is -9.48. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CRPHY's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is less volatile compared to CRPHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check CRPHY's competition here
TNPOF vs XPPLF Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, XPPLF has a market cap of 334.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while XPPLF trades at $12.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas XPPLF's P/E ratio is -22.22. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to XPPLF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is less volatile compared to XPPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check XPPLF's competition here
TNPOF vs ALFNF Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, ALFNF has a market cap of 330.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while ALFNF trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas ALFNF's P/E ratio is -10.41. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ALFNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is less volatile compared to ALFNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check ALFNF's competition here
TNPOF vs CPWHF Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, CPWHF has a market cap of 310.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while CPWHF trades at $1.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas CPWHF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CPWHF's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is less volatile compared to CPWHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check CPWHF's competition here
TNPOF vs COSXF Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, COSXF has a market cap of 288.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while COSXF trades at $7.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas COSXF's P/E ratio is 43.81. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to COSXF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is less volatile compared to COSXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check COSXF's competition here
TNPOF vs ABHBY Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, ABHBY has a market cap of 260.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while ABHBY trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas ABHBY's P/E ratio is 27.27. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ABHBY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is less volatile compared to ABHBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check ABHBY's competition here
TNPOF vs NVNXF Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, NVNXF has a market cap of 210.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while NVNXF trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas NVNXF's P/E ratio is -1.83. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NVNXF's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is less volatile compared to NVNXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check NVNXF's competition here
TNPOF vs PCELF Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, PCELF has a market cap of 182.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while PCELF trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas PCELF's P/E ratio is -39.44. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PCELF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is more volatile compared to PCELF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check PCELF's competition here
TNPOF vs FCELB Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, FCELB has a market cap of 120.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while FCELB trades at $309.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas FCELB's P/E ratio is -1003.25. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FCELB's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is less volatile compared to FCELB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check FCELB's competition here
TNPOF vs GELNF Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, GELNF has a market cap of 111.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while GELNF trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas GELNF's P/E ratio is -3.26. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GELNF's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is more volatile compared to GELNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check GELNF's competition here
TNPOF vs ILIKF Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, ILIKF has a market cap of 111.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while ILIKF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas ILIKF's P/E ratio is -12.32. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ILIKF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is less volatile compared to ILIKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check ILIKF's competition here
TNPOF vs DIALF Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, DIALF has a market cap of 104M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while DIALF trades at $2.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas DIALF's P/E ratio is -7.65. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DIALF's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is less volatile compared to DIALF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check DIALF's competition here
TNPOF vs AFGYF Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, AFGYF has a market cap of 97.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while AFGYF trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas AFGYF's P/E ratio is -3.45. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AFGYF's ROE of -0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is more volatile compared to AFGYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check AFGYF's competition here
TNPOF vs VARTY Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, VARTY has a market cap of 89.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while VARTY trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas VARTY's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to VARTY's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is less volatile compared to VARTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check VARTY's competition here
TNPOF vs ONMBF Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, ONMBF has a market cap of 84.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while ONMBF trades at $6.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas ONMBF's P/E ratio is 4.32. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ONMBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is more volatile compared to ONMBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check ONMBF's competition here
TNPOF vs TNTLF Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, TNTLF has a market cap of 60.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while TNTLF trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas TNTLF's P/E ratio is -59.63. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TNTLF's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is less volatile compared to TNTLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check TNTLF's competition here
TNPOF vs ARTGF Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, ARTGF has a market cap of 45.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while ARTGF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas ARTGF's P/E ratio is -11.50. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ARTGF's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is less volatile compared to ARTGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check ARTGF's competition here
TNPOF vs EXROF Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, EXROF has a market cap of 31.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while EXROF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas EXROF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EXROF's ROE of -3.78%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is less volatile compared to EXROF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check EXROF's competition here
TNPOF vs MNSEF Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, MNSEF has a market cap of 30M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while MNSEF trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas MNSEF's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to MNSEF's ROE of -3.54%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is less volatile compared to MNSEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check MNSEF's competition here
TNPOF vs NHHHF Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, NHHHF has a market cap of 27.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while NHHHF trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas NHHHF's P/E ratio is -1.66. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NHHHF's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is less volatile compared to NHHHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check NHHHF's competition here
TNPOF vs IHGP Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, IHGP has a market cap of 18.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while IHGP trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas IHGP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to IHGP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is more volatile compared to IHGP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check IHGP's competition here
TNPOF vs QBAK Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, QBAK has a market cap of 13.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while QBAK trades at $7.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas QBAK's P/E ratio is -14.22. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to QBAK's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is less volatile compared to QBAK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check QBAK's competition here
TNPOF vs ORBT Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, ORBT has a market cap of 12.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while ORBT trades at $3.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas ORBT's P/E ratio is 13.04. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ORBT's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is less volatile compared to ORBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check ORBT's competition here
TNPOF vs LPSIF Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, LPSIF has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while LPSIF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas LPSIF's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LPSIF's ROE of -2.64%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is less volatile compared to LPSIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check LPSIF's competition here
TNPOF vs DFEL Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, DFEL has a market cap of 10.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while DFEL trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas DFEL's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DFEL's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is more volatile compared to DFEL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check DFEL's competition here
TNPOF vs SSCFF Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, SSCFF has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while SSCFF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas SSCFF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SSCFF's ROE of +3.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is more volatile compared to SSCFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check SSCFF's competition here
TNPOF vs ASTO Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, ASTO has a market cap of 5.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while ASTO trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas ASTO's P/E ratio is 11.06. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ASTO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is more volatile compared to ASTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check ASTO's competition here
TNPOF vs HYEG Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, HYEG has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while HYEG trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas HYEG's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HYEG's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is less volatile compared to HYEG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check HYEG's competition here
TNPOF vs LNNNF Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, LNNNF has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while LNNNF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas LNNNF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LNNNF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is more volatile compared to LNNNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check LNNNF's competition here
TNPOF vs GPGC Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, GPGC has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while GPGC trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas GPGC's P/E ratio is -2.71. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GPGC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is more volatile compared to GPGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check GPGC's competition here
TNPOF vs CECBF Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, CECBF has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while CECBF trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas CECBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CECBF's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is less volatile compared to CECBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check CECBF's competition here
TNPOF vs EGTYF Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, EGTYF has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while EGTYF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas EGTYF's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EGTYF's ROE of +3.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is more volatile compared to EGTYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check EGTYF's competition here
TNPOF vs LPENF Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, LPENF has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while LPENF trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas LPENF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LPENF's ROE of -2.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is less volatile compared to LPENF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check LPENF's competition here
TNPOF vs IDGC Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, IDGC has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while IDGC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas IDGC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to IDGC's ROE of -2.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is more volatile compared to IDGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check IDGC's competition here
TNPOF vs CAPC Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, CAPC has a market cap of 1.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while CAPC trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas CAPC's P/E ratio is -3.74. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CAPC's ROE of -2.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is less volatile compared to CAPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check CAPC's competition here
TNPOF vs OZSC Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, OZSC has a market cap of 1.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while OZSC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas OZSC's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to OZSC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is less volatile compared to OZSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check OZSC's competition here
TNPOF vs GBLTF Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, GBLTF has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while GBLTF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas GBLTF's P/E ratio is -1.43. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GBLTF's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is more volatile compared to GBLTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check GBLTF's competition here
TNPOF vs ZAIRF Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, ZAIRF has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while ZAIRF trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas ZAIRF's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ZAIRF's ROE of +1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is less volatile compared to ZAIRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check ZAIRF's competition here
TNPOF vs ENEVF Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, ENEVF has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while ENEVF trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas ENEVF's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ENEVF's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is more volatile compared to ENEVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check ENEVF's competition here
TNPOF vs USLG Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, USLG has a market cap of 1.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while USLG trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas USLG's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to USLG's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is less volatile compared to USLG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check USLG's competition here
TNPOF vs TOGI Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, TOGI has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while TOGI trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas TOGI's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TOGI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is less volatile compared to TOGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check TOGI's competition here
TNPOF vs BSTK Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, BSTK has a market cap of 1M. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while BSTK trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas BSTK's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to BSTK's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is less volatile compared to BSTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check BSTK's competition here
TNPOF vs KRFG Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, KRFG has a market cap of 997.6K. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while KRFG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas KRFG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KRFG's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is more volatile compared to KRFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check KRFG's competition here
TNPOF vs LNNNY Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, LNNNY has a market cap of 980.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while LNNNY trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas LNNNY's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LNNNY's ROE of +8.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is more volatile compared to LNNNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check LNNNY's competition here
TNPOF vs SGLN Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, SGLN has a market cap of 569K. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while SGLN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas SGLN's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SGLN's ROE of +1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is more volatile compared to SGLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check SGLN's competition here
TNPOF vs PSTO Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, PSTO has a market cap of 470.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while PSTO trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas PSTO's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to PSTO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is more volatile compared to PSTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check PSTO's competition here
TNPOF vs IMHCW Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, IMHCW has a market cap of 204K. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while IMHCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas IMHCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to IMHCW's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is less volatile compared to IMHCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check IMHCW's competition here
TNPOF vs AIPG Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, AIPG has a market cap of 20.8K. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while AIPG trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas AIPG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AIPG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is more volatile compared to AIPG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check AIPG's competition here
TNPOF vs EIPC Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, EIPC has a market cap of 20.7K. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while EIPC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas EIPC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to EIPC's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is less volatile compared to EIPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check EIPC's competition here
TNPOF vs DLYT Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, DLYT has a market cap of 13.6K. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while DLYT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas DLYT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DLYT's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is more volatile compared to DLYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check DLYT's competition here
TNPOF vs CHGI Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, CHGI has a market cap of 13K. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while CHGI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas CHGI's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to CHGI's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is more volatile compared to CHGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check CHGI's competition here
TNPOF vs FDEI Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, FDEI has a market cap of 11.3K. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while FDEI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas FDEI's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to FDEI's ROE of +0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is less volatile compared to FDEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check FDEI's competition here
TNPOF vs DCFCQ Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, DCFCQ has a market cap of 9.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while DCFCQ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas DCFCQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to DCFCQ's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is less volatile compared to DCFCQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check DCFCQ's competition here
TNPOF vs LSCG Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, LSCG has a market cap of 6.5K. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while LSCG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas LSCG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LSCG's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is more volatile compared to LSCG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check LSCG's competition here
TNPOF vs GNAL Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, GNAL has a market cap of 6.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while GNAL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas GNAL's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GNAL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is more volatile compared to GNAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check GNAL's competition here
TNPOF vs GCHT Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, GCHT has a market cap of 5.9K. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while GCHT trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas GCHT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GCHT's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is less volatile compared to GCHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check GCHT's competition here
TNPOF vs USGA Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, USGA has a market cap of 4.4K. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while USGA trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas USGA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to USGA's ROE of +1.93%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is more volatile compared to USGA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check USGA's competition here
TNPOF vs GCLL Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, GCLL has a market cap of 3.2K. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while GCLL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas GCLL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to GCLL's ROE of +3.87%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is more volatile compared to GCLL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check GCLL's competition here
TNPOF vs HLXW Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, HLXW has a market cap of 2.7K. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while HLXW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas HLXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HLXW's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is more volatile compared to HLXW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check HLXW's competition here
TNPOF vs XNNHQ Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, XNNHQ has a market cap of 2.6K. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while XNNHQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas XNNHQ's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to XNNHQ's ROE of +1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is more volatile compared to XNNHQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check XNNHQ's competition here
TNPOF vs TMGY Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, TMGY has a market cap of 2.3K. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while TMGY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas TMGY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TMGY's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is more volatile compared to TMGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check TMGY's competition here
TNPOF vs TRUL Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, TRUL has a market cap of 2.1K. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while TRUL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas TRUL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TRUL's ROE of +7.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is more volatile compared to TRUL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check TRUL's competition here
TNPOF vs AXPWQ Comparison July 2025
TNPOF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNPOF stands at 115.4M. In comparison, AXPWQ has a market cap of 960. Regarding current trading prices, TNPOF is priced at $0.11, while AXPWQ trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNPOF currently has a P/E ratio of 2.80, whereas AXPWQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TNPOF's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AXPWQ's ROE of +2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, TNPOF is more volatile compared to AXPWQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNPOF.Check AXPWQ's competition here