Tenma Corporation
Tenma Corporation (TNMAF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TNMAF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TNMAF | $20.20 | +1.045175215087487e+25% | 407.7M | 16.03 | $1.26 | +2.76% |
| AIQUY | $42.78 | +0.61% | 123.4B | 31.03 | $1.38 | +1.70% |
| AIQUF | $213.99 | +0.56% | 123.4B | 31.06 | $6.89 | +1.71% |
| PTCAY | $56.00 | +0.00% | 48.4B | 31.82 | $1.76 | +0.06% |
| PTPIF | $0.53 | +0.00% | 45.6B | 26.33 | $0.02 | +0.07% |
| GVDNY | $85.47 | +1.48% | 39.5B | 29.34 | $2.92 | +1.81% |
| GVDBF | $4,213.38 | +5.31% | 38.9B | 29.50 | $142.82 | +1.88% |
| SKFOF | $239.00 | +2.12% | 38.3B | 25.32 | $9.44 | +1.70% |
| SXYAY | $23.77 | +2.32% | 38.1B | 25.29 | $0.94 | +1.75% |
| AKZOY | $23.79 | +7.62% | 36.7B | 25.62 | $0.93 | +3.12% |
Stock Comparison
TNMAF vs AIQUY Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, AIQUY has a market cap of 123.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while AIQUY trades at $42.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas AIQUY's P/E ratio is 31.03. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AIQUY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is less volatile compared to AIQUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check AIQUY's competition here
TNMAF vs AIQUF Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, AIQUF has a market cap of 123.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while AIQUF trades at $213.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas AIQUF's P/E ratio is 31.06. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AIQUF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is less volatile compared to AIQUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check AIQUF's competition here
TNMAF vs PTCAY Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, PTCAY has a market cap of 48.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while PTCAY trades at $56.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas PTCAY's P/E ratio is 31.82. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PTCAY's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is less volatile compared to PTCAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check PTCAY's competition here
TNMAF vs PTPIF Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, PTPIF has a market cap of 45.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while PTPIF trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas PTPIF's P/E ratio is 26.33. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PTPIF's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is less volatile compared to PTPIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check PTPIF's competition here
TNMAF vs GVDNY Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, GVDNY has a market cap of 39.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while GVDNY trades at $85.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas GVDNY's P/E ratio is 29.34. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GVDNY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is less volatile compared to GVDNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check GVDNY's competition here
TNMAF vs GVDBF Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, GVDBF has a market cap of 38.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while GVDBF trades at $4,213.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas GVDBF's P/E ratio is 29.50. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GVDBF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is more volatile compared to GVDBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check GVDBF's competition here
TNMAF vs SKFOF Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, SKFOF has a market cap of 38.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while SKFOF trades at $239.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas SKFOF's P/E ratio is 25.32. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SKFOF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is less volatile compared to SKFOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check SKFOF's competition here
TNMAF vs SXYAY Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, SXYAY has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while SXYAY trades at $23.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas SXYAY's P/E ratio is 25.29. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SXYAY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is less volatile compared to SXYAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check SXYAY's competition here
TNMAF vs AKZOY Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, AKZOY has a market cap of 36.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while AKZOY trades at $23.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas AKZOY's P/E ratio is 25.62. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AKZOY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is less volatile compared to AKZOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check AKZOY's competition here
TNMAF vs NVZMY Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, NVZMY has a market cap of 29.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while NVZMY trades at $63.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas NVZMY's P/E ratio is 55.16. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NVZMY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is less volatile compared to NVZMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check NVZMY's competition here
TNMAF vs NVZMF Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, NVZMF has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while NVZMF trades at $62.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas NVZMF's P/E ratio is 54.31. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NVZMF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is more volatile compared to NVZMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check NVZMF's competition here
TNMAF vs NPCPF Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, NPCPF has a market cap of 19.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while NPCPF trades at $8.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas NPCPF's P/E ratio is 18.88. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NPCPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is less volatile compared to NPCPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check NPCPF's competition here
TNMAF vs EMSHF Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, EMSHF has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while EMSHF trades at $764.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas EMSHF's P/E ratio is 31.15. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EMSHF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is less volatile compared to EMSHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check EMSHF's competition here
TNMAF vs NDEKF Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, NDEKF has a market cap of 15B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while NDEKF trades at $22.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas NDEKF's P/E ratio is 16.62. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NDEKF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is less volatile compared to NDEKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check NDEKF's competition here
TNMAF vs SYIEY Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, SYIEY has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while SYIEY trades at $24.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas SYIEY's P/E ratio is 23.20. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SYIEY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is less volatile compared to SYIEY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check SYIEY's competition here
TNMAF vs SYIEF Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, SYIEF has a market cap of 13.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while SYIEF trades at $96.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas SYIEF's P/E ratio is 22.73. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SYIEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is less volatile compared to SYIEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check SYIEF's competition here
TNMAF vs COVTY Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, COVTY has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while COVTY trades at $35.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas COVTY's P/E ratio is -30.18. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to COVTY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is more volatile compared to COVTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check COVTY's competition here
TNMAF vs CVVTF Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, CVVTF has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while CVVTF trades at $70.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas CVVTF's P/E ratio is -30.21. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CVVTF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is more volatile compared to CVVTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check CVVTF's competition here
TNMAF vs AKZOF Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, AKZOF has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while AKZOF trades at $69.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas AKZOF's P/E ratio is 24.98. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AKZOF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is more volatile compared to AKZOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check AKZOF's competition here
TNMAF vs CRTSF Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, CRTSF has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while CRTSF trades at $79.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas CRTSF's P/E ratio is 41.96. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CRTSF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is more volatile compared to CRTSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check CRTSF's competition here
TNMAF vs CHYHY Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, CHYHY has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while CHYHY trades at $19.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas CHYHY's P/E ratio is 41.67. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CHYHY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is less volatile compared to CHYHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check CHYHY's competition here
TNMAF vs BNTGY Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, BNTGY has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while BNTGY trades at $12.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas BNTGY's P/E ratio is 18.90. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BNTGY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is less volatile compared to BNTGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check BNTGY's competition here
TNMAF vs BNTGF Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, BNTGF has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while BNTGF trades at $64.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas BNTGF's P/E ratio is 18.75. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BNTGF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is more volatile compared to BNTGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check BNTGF's competition here
TNMAF vs EVKIY Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, EVKIY has a market cap of 9.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while EVKIY trades at $9.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas EVKIY's P/E ratio is 18.28. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EVKIY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is less volatile compared to EVKIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check EVKIY's competition here
TNMAF vs EVKIF Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, EVKIF has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while EVKIF trades at $19.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas EVKIF's P/E ratio is 18.09. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EVKIF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is less volatile compared to EVKIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check EVKIF's competition here
TNMAF vs SCVUF Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, SCVUF has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while SCVUF trades at $7.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas SCVUF's P/E ratio is 51.16. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SCVUF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is less volatile compared to SCVUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check SCVUF's competition here
TNMAF vs IMDZF Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, IMDZF has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while IMDZF trades at $133.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas IMDZF's P/E ratio is 25.08. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IMDZF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is less volatile compared to IMDZF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check IMDZF's competition here
TNMAF vs OCLDY Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, OCLDY has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while OCLDY trades at $13.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas OCLDY's P/E ratio is 115.83. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OCLDY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is more volatile compared to OCLDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check OCLDY's competition here
TNMAF vs ASGLY Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, ASGLY has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while ASGLY trades at $6.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas ASGLY's P/E ratio is 28.18. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ASGLY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is less volatile compared to ASGLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check ASGLY's competition here
TNMAF vs FUPBY Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, FUPBY has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while FUPBY trades at $12.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas FUPBY's P/E ratio is 19.38. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FUPBY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is less volatile compared to FUPBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check FUPBY's competition here
TNMAF vs ASGLF Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, ASGLF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while ASGLF trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas ASGLF's P/E ratio is 27.27. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ASGLF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is less volatile compared to ASGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check ASGLF's competition here
TNMAF vs NDEKY Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, NDEKY has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while NDEKY trades at $22.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas NDEKY's P/E ratio is 16.94. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NDEKY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is less volatile compared to NDEKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check NDEKY's competition here
TNMAF vs SCVPY Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, SCVPY has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while SCVPY trades at $4.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas SCVPY's P/E ratio is 37.69. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SCVPY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is more volatile compared to SCVPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check SCVPY's competition here
TNMAF vs OCLDF Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, OCLDF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while OCLDF trades at $12.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas OCLDF's P/E ratio is 102.08. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OCLDF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is less volatile compared to OCLDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check OCLDF's competition here
TNMAF vs ARKAY Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, ARKAY has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while ARKAY trades at $75.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas ARKAY's P/E ratio is 25.59. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ARKAY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is more volatile compared to ARKAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check ARKAY's competition here
TNMAF vs FUPEF Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, FUPEF has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while FUPEF trades at $39.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas FUPEF's P/E ratio is 15.41. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FUPEF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is more volatile compared to FUPEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check FUPEF's competition here
TNMAF vs ARKAF Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, ARKAF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while ARKAF trades at $70.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas ARKAF's P/E ratio is 23.95. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ARKAF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is less volatile compared to ARKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check ARKAF's competition here
TNMAF vs COIHY Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, COIHY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while COIHY trades at $17.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas COIHY's P/E ratio is 16.55. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to COIHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is less volatile compared to COIHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check COIHY's competition here
TNMAF vs MITUY Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, MITUY has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while MITUY trades at $12.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas MITUY's P/E ratio is 21.64. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MITUY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is more volatile compared to MITUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check MITUY's competition here
TNMAF vs COIHF Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, COIHF has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while COIHF trades at $33.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas COIHF's P/E ratio is 16.29. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to COIHF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is less volatile compared to COIHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check COIHF's competition here
TNMAF vs JMPLY Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, JMPLY has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while JMPLY trades at $51.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas JMPLY's P/E ratio is 9.08. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JMPLY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is more volatile compared to JMPLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check JMPLY's competition here
TNMAF vs FUPPF Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, FUPPF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while FUPPF trades at $42.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas FUPPF's P/E ratio is 17.20. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FUPPF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is less volatile compared to FUPPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check FUPPF's competition here
TNMAF vs KDSKF Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, KDSKF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while KDSKF trades at $25.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas KDSKF's P/E ratio is -8.49. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KDSKF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is less volatile compared to KDSKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check KDSKF's competition here
TNMAF vs MITUF Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, MITUF has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while MITUF trades at $23.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas MITUF's P/E ratio is 20.24. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MITUF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is less volatile compared to MITUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check MITUF's competition here
TNMAF vs WKCMF Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, WKCMF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while WKCMF trades at $78.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas WKCMF's P/E ratio is 24.75. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to WKCMF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is less volatile compared to WKCMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check WKCMF's competition here
TNMAF vs AZLGF Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, AZLGF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while AZLGF trades at $15.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas AZLGF's P/E ratio is 20.01. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AZLGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is more volatile compared to AZLGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check AZLGF's competition here
TNMAF vs JMPLF Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, JMPLF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while JMPLF trades at $23.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas JMPLF's P/E ratio is 8.18. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JMPLF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is less volatile compared to JMPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check JMPLF's competition here
TNMAF vs SASOF Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, SASOF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while SASOF trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas SASOF's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SASOF's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is more volatile compared to SASOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check SASOF's competition here
TNMAF vs CLZNF Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, CLZNF has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while CLZNF trades at $10.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas CLZNF's P/E ratio is 26.17. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CLZNF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is less volatile compared to CLZNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check CLZNF's competition here
TNMAF vs CLZNY Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, CLZNY has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while CLZNY trades at $10.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas CLZNY's P/E ratio is 25.55. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CLZNY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is more volatile compared to CLZNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check CLZNY's competition here
TNMAF vs AWTRF Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, AWTRF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while AWTRF trades at $15.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas AWTRF's P/E ratio is 10.42. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AWTRF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is more volatile compared to AWTRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check AWTRF's competition here
TNMAF vs HXXPY Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, HXXPY has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while HXXPY trades at $9.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas HXXPY's P/E ratio is 15.97. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HXXPY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is less volatile compared to HXXPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check HXXPY's competition here
TNMAF vs NOFCF Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, NOFCF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while NOFCF trades at $14.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas NOFCF's P/E ratio is 14.82. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NOFCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is less volatile compared to NOFCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check NOFCF's competition here
TNMAF vs MBGCF Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, MBGCF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while MBGCF trades at $16.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas MBGCF's P/E ratio is 10.88. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MBGCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is more volatile compared to MBGCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check MBGCF's competition here
TNMAF vs KPTCY Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, KPTCY has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while KPTCY trades at $8.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas KPTCY's P/E ratio is 15.11. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KPTCY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is less volatile compared to KPTCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check KPTCY's competition here
TNMAF vs ICPVF Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, ICPVF has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while ICPVF trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas ICPVF's P/E ratio is -32.40. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ICPVF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is less volatile compared to ICPVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check ICPVF's competition here
TNMAF vs HXPLF Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, HXPLF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while HXPLF trades at $8.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas HXPLF's P/E ratio is 13.56. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HXPLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is less volatile compared to HXPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check HXPLF's competition here
TNMAF vs INCZY Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, INCZY has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while INCZY trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas INCZY's P/E ratio is -9.47. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to INCZY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is less volatile compared to INCZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check INCZY's competition here
TNMAF vs KSANF Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, KSANF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while KSANF trades at $14.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas KSANF's P/E ratio is 12.42. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KSANF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is less volatile compared to KSANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check KSANF's competition here
TNMAF vs LNXSF Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, LNXSF has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while LNXSF trades at $29.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas LNXSF's P/E ratio is -13.33. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LNXSF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is more volatile compared to LNXSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check LNXSF's competition here
TNMAF vs LNXSY Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, LNXSY has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while LNXSY trades at $5.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas LNXSY's P/E ratio is -13.34. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LNXSY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is more volatile compared to LNXSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check LNXSY's competition here
TNMAF vs TKKYY Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, TKKYY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while TKKYY trades at $8.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas TKKYY's P/E ratio is 32.24. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TKKYY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is less volatile compared to TKKYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check TKKYY's competition here
TNMAF vs DACHF Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, DACHF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while DACHF trades at $8.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas DACHF's P/E ratio is 6.85. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DACHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is less volatile compared to DACHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check DACHF's competition here
TNMAF vs IRLCF Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, IRLCF has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while IRLCF trades at $275.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas IRLCF's P/E ratio is 12.64. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IRLCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is more volatile compared to IRLCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check IRLCF's competition here
TNMAF vs ZEOOY Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, ZEOOY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while ZEOOY trades at $9.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas ZEOOY's P/E ratio is 9.36. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ZEOOY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is less volatile compared to ZEOOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check ZEOOY's competition here
TNMAF vs ZEOOF Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, ZEOOF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while ZEOOF trades at $9.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas ZEOOF's P/E ratio is 9.64. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ZEOOF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is less volatile compared to ZEOOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check ZEOOF's competition here
TNMAF vs BRRDF Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, BRRDF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while BRRDF trades at $17.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas BRRDF's P/E ratio is 21.75. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BRRDF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is more volatile compared to BRRDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check BRRDF's competition here
TNMAF vs KPLIF Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, KPLIF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while KPLIF trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas KPLIF's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KPLIF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is less volatile compared to KPLIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check KPLIF's competition here
TNMAF vs TKYMY Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, TKYMY has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while TKYMY trades at $10.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas TKYMY's P/E ratio is 9.88. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TKYMY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is less volatile compared to TKYMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check TKYMY's competition here
TNMAF vs KANKF Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, KANKF has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while KANKF trades at $24.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas KANKF's P/E ratio is 13.99. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KANKF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is more volatile compared to KANKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check KANKF's competition here
TNMAF vs ALZCF Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, ALZCF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while ALZCF trades at $152.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas ALZCF's P/E ratio is 22.93. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ALZCF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is less volatile compared to ALZCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check ALZCF's competition here
TNMAF vs ELKEF Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, ELKEF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while ELKEF trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas ELKEF's P/E ratio is 21.36. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ELKEF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is more volatile compared to ELKEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check ELKEF's competition here
TNMAF vs ELMTY Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, ELMTY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while ELMTY trades at $8.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas ELMTY's P/E ratio is -31.79. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ELMTY's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is less volatile compared to ELMTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check ELMTY's competition here
TNMAF vs EMNSF Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, EMNSF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while EMNSF trades at $2.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas EMNSF's P/E ratio is -32.21. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EMNSF's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is more volatile compared to EMNSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check EMNSF's competition here
TNMAF vs TKCBF Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, TKCBF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while TKCBF trades at $5.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas TKCBF's P/E ratio is -3.24. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TKCBF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is less volatile compared to TKCBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check TKCBF's competition here
TNMAF vs OCINF Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, OCINF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while OCINF trades at $5.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas OCINF's P/E ratio is -7.66. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OCINF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is less volatile compared to OCINF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check OCINF's competition here
TNMAF vs TKCBY Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, TKCBY has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while TKCBY trades at $22.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas TKCBY's P/E ratio is -3.20. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TKCBY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is less volatile compared to TKCBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check TKCBY's competition here
TNMAF vs HUABF Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, HUABF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while HUABF trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas HUABF's P/E ratio is -18.69. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HUABF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is less volatile compared to HUABF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check HUABF's competition here
TNMAF vs CSNVY Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, CSNVY has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while CSNVY trades at $20.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas CSNVY's P/E ratio is 15.58. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CSNVY's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is less volatile compared to CSNVY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check CSNVY's competition here
TNMAF vs CUYRF Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, CUYRF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while CUYRF trades at $70.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas CUYRF's P/E ratio is 13.34. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CUYRF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is less volatile compared to CUYRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check CUYRF's competition here
TNMAF vs CSNVF Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, CSNVF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while CSNVF trades at $19.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas CSNVF's P/E ratio is 15.05. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CSNVF's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is less volatile compared to CSNVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check CSNVF's competition here
TNMAF vs ALPKF Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, ALPKF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while ALPKF trades at $0.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas ALPKF's P/E ratio is -13.17. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ALPKF's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is less volatile compared to ALPKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check ALPKF's competition here
TNMAF vs TKYMF Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, TKYMF has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while TKYMF trades at $15.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas TKYMF's P/E ratio is 6.37. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TKYMF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is more volatile compared to TKYMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check TKYMF's competition here
TNMAF vs LNTEF Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, LNTEF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while LNTEF trades at $16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas LNTEF's P/E ratio is 21.92. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LNTEF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is more volatile compared to LNTEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check LNTEF's competition here
TNMAF vs FPLSF Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, FPLSF has a market cap of 994.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while FPLSF trades at $11.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas FPLSF's P/E ratio is 31.00. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FPLSF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is less volatile compared to FPLSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check FPLSF's competition here
TNMAF vs HUIHY Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, HUIHY has a market cap of 943.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while HUIHY trades at $14.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas HUIHY's P/E ratio is 28.63. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HUIHY's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is less volatile compared to HUIHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check HUIHY's competition here
TNMAF vs AECLY Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, AECLY has a market cap of 833.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while AECLY trades at $7.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas AECLY's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AECLY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is more volatile compared to AECLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check AECLY's competition here
TNMAF vs SKKAF Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, SKKAF has a market cap of 812.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while SKKAF trades at $60.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas SKKAF's P/E ratio is 11.19. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SKKAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is less volatile compared to SKKAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check SKKAF's competition here
TNMAF vs HASGF Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, HASGF has a market cap of 809.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while HASGF trades at $19.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas HASGF's P/E ratio is 15.73. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HASGF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is less volatile compared to HASGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check HASGF's competition here
TNMAF vs VTXPF Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, VTXPF has a market cap of 799.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while VTXPF trades at $9.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas VTXPF's P/E ratio is 19.98. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VTXPF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is less volatile compared to VTXPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check VTXPF's competition here
TNMAF vs VBVBF Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, VBVBF has a market cap of 771M. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while VBVBF trades at $12.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas VBVBF's P/E ratio is -20.51. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VBVBF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is less volatile compared to VBVBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check VBVBF's competition here
TNMAF vs DALQF Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, DALQF has a market cap of 757.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while DALQF trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas DALQF's P/E ratio is 10.60. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DALQF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is less volatile compared to DALQF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check DALQF's competition here
TNMAF vs SYCHF Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, SYCHF has a market cap of 720.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while SYCHF trades at $32.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas SYCHF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SYCHF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is more volatile compared to SYCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check SYCHF's competition here
TNMAF vs DLNDY Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, DLNDY has a market cap of 712.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while DLNDY trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas DLNDY's P/E ratio is 16.63. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DLNDY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is less volatile compared to DLNDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check DLNDY's competition here
TNMAF vs TYOBY Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, TYOBY has a market cap of 604M. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while TYOBY trades at $6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas TYOBY's P/E ratio is 171.25. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TYOBY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is less volatile compared to TYOBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check TYOBY's competition here
TNMAF vs NOPMF Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, NOPMF has a market cap of 505.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while NOPMF trades at $12.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas NOPMF's P/E ratio is -48.68. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NOPMF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is less volatile compared to NOPMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check NOPMF's competition here
TNMAF vs FLRAF Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, FLRAF has a market cap of 448M. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while FLRAF trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas FLRAF's P/E ratio is 39.25. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FLRAF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is more volatile compared to FLRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check FLRAF's competition here
TNMAF vs NCRBF Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, NCRBF has a market cap of 331.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while NCRBF trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas NCRBF's P/E ratio is 15.00. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NCRBF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is more volatile compared to NCRBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check NCRBF's competition here
TNMAF vs SYYYF Comparison August 2025
TNMAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TNMAF stands at 407.7M. In comparison, SYYYF has a market cap of 294.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TNMAF is priced at $20.20, while SYYYF trades at $1.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TNMAF currently has a P/E ratio of 16.03, whereas SYYYF's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, TNMAF's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SYYYF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TNMAF is more volatile compared to SYYYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TNMAF.Check SYYYF's competition here