Timken India Limited
Timken India Limited (TIMKEN.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TIMKEN.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TIMKEN.NS | ₹3,470.80 | +0.50% | 262.4B | 57.86 | ₹60.29 | +1.03% |
| TIMKEN.BO | ₹3,467.85 | +0.49% | 263.1B | 60.84 | ₹57.48 | +1.03% |
| RKFORGE.BO | ₹532.80 | +0.15% | 98.5B | 45.79 | ₹11.90 | +0.37% |
| RKFORGE.NS | ₹532.80 | +0.29% | 98.5B | 45.64 | ₹11.92 | +0.37% |
| ESABINDIA.NS | ₹5,401.20 | -0.28% | 84.9B | 39.35 | ₹140.15 | +1.67% |
| ESABINDIA.BO | ₹5,397.15 | -0.27% | 84.7B | 40.68 | ₹135.29 | +1.67% |
| SKFINDIA.BO | ₹1,604.40 | +1.02% | 80.2B | 14.96 | ₹108.50 | +0.89% |
| SKFINDIA.NS | ₹1,604.50 | +1.19% | 80.1B | 16.27 | ₹99.58 | +0.89% |
| KENNAMET.NS | ₹2,430.50 | -1.84% | 53.4B | 72.70 | ₹33.43 | +1.79% |
| TIIL.BO | ₹2,397.70 | +1.41% | 53B | 19.01 | ₹122.95 | +0.86% |
Stock Comparison
TIMKEN.NS vs TIMKEN.BO Comparison April 2026
TIMKEN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 262.4B. In comparison, TIMKEN.BO has a market cap of 263.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,470.80, while TIMKEN.BO trades at ₹3,467.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.86, whereas TIMKEN.BO's P/E ratio is 60.84. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TIMKEN.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to TIMKEN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check TIMKEN.BO's competition here
TIMKEN.NS vs RKFORGE.BO Comparison April 2026
TIMKEN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 262.4B. In comparison, RKFORGE.BO has a market cap of 98.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,470.80, while RKFORGE.BO trades at ₹532.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.86, whereas RKFORGE.BO's P/E ratio is 45.79. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RKFORGE.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to RKFORGE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check RKFORGE.BO's competition here
TIMKEN.NS vs RKFORGE.NS Comparison April 2026
TIMKEN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 262.4B. In comparison, RKFORGE.NS has a market cap of 98.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,470.80, while RKFORGE.NS trades at ₹532.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.86, whereas RKFORGE.NS's P/E ratio is 45.64. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to RKFORGE.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to RKFORGE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check RKFORGE.NS's competition here
TIMKEN.NS vs ESABINDIA.NS Comparison April 2026
TIMKEN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 262.4B. In comparison, ESABINDIA.NS has a market cap of 84.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,470.80, while ESABINDIA.NS trades at ₹5,401.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.86, whereas ESABINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 39.35. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ESABINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to ESABINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check ESABINDIA.NS's competition here
TIMKEN.NS vs ESABINDIA.BO Comparison April 2026
TIMKEN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 262.4B. In comparison, ESABINDIA.BO has a market cap of 84.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,470.80, while ESABINDIA.BO trades at ₹5,397.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.86, whereas ESABINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 40.68. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to ESABINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to ESABINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check ESABINDIA.BO's competition here
TIMKEN.NS vs SKFINDIA.BO Comparison April 2026
TIMKEN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 262.4B. In comparison, SKFINDIA.BO has a market cap of 80.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,470.80, while SKFINDIA.BO trades at ₹1,604.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.86, whereas SKFINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 14.96. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SKFINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to SKFINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check SKFINDIA.BO's competition here
TIMKEN.NS vs SKFINDIA.NS Comparison April 2026
TIMKEN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 262.4B. In comparison, SKFINDIA.NS has a market cap of 80.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,470.80, while SKFINDIA.NS trades at ₹1,604.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.86, whereas SKFINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 16.27. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to SKFINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to SKFINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check SKFINDIA.NS's competition here
TIMKEN.NS vs KENNAMET.NS Comparison April 2026
TIMKEN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 262.4B. In comparison, KENNAMET.NS has a market cap of 53.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,470.80, while KENNAMET.NS trades at ₹2,430.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.86, whereas KENNAMET.NS's P/E ratio is 72.70. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KENNAMET.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to KENNAMET.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check KENNAMET.NS's competition here
TIMKEN.NS vs TIIL.BO Comparison April 2026
TIMKEN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 262.4B. In comparison, TIIL.BO has a market cap of 53B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,470.80, while TIIL.BO trades at ₹2,397.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.86, whereas TIIL.BO's P/E ratio is 19.01. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TIIL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to TIIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check TIIL.BO's competition here
TIMKEN.NS vs TIIL.NS Comparison April 2026
TIMKEN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 262.4B. In comparison, TIIL.NS has a market cap of 52.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,470.80, while TIIL.NS trades at ₹2,405.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.86, whereas TIIL.NS's P/E ratio is 18.89. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TIIL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to TIIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check TIIL.NS's competition here
TIMKEN.NS vs KENNAMET.BO Comparison April 2026
TIMKEN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 262.4B. In comparison, KENNAMET.BO has a market cap of 49.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,470.80, while KENNAMET.BO trades at ₹2,293.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.86, whereas KENNAMET.BO's P/E ratio is 44.12. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KENNAMET.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to KENNAMET.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check KENNAMET.BO's competition here
TIMKEN.NS vs HARSHA.NS Comparison April 2026
TIMKEN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 262.4B. In comparison, HARSHA.NS has a market cap of 32.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,470.80, while HARSHA.NS trades at ₹370.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.86, whereas HARSHA.NS's P/E ratio is 30.83. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HARSHA.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to HARSHA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check HARSHA.NS's competition here
TIMKEN.NS vs HARSHA.BO Comparison April 2026
TIMKEN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 262.4B. In comparison, HARSHA.BO has a market cap of 32.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,470.80, while HARSHA.BO trades at ₹370.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.86, whereas HARSHA.BO's P/E ratio is 30.86. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to HARSHA.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to HARSHA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check HARSHA.BO's competition here
TIMKEN.NS vs WENDT.NS Comparison April 2026
TIMKEN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 262.4B. In comparison, WENDT.NS has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,470.80, while WENDT.NS trades at ₹6,851.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.86, whereas WENDT.NS's P/E ratio is 61.77. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WENDT.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to WENDT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check WENDT.NS's competition here
TIMKEN.NS vs WENDT.BO Comparison April 2026
TIMKEN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 262.4B. In comparison, WENDT.BO has a market cap of 13.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,470.80, while WENDT.BO trades at ₹6,882.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.86, whereas WENDT.BO's P/E ratio is 61.97. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to WENDT.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to WENDT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check WENDT.BO's competition here
TIMKEN.NS vs STERTOOLS.BO Comparison April 2026
TIMKEN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 262.4B. In comparison, STERTOOLS.BO has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,470.80, while STERTOOLS.BO trades at ₹229.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.86, whereas STERTOOLS.BO's P/E ratio is 23.63. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to STERTOOLS.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to STERTOOLS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check STERTOOLS.BO's competition here
TIMKEN.NS vs STERTOOLS.NS Comparison April 2026
TIMKEN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 262.4B. In comparison, STERTOOLS.NS has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,470.80, while STERTOOLS.NS trades at ₹227.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.86, whereas STERTOOLS.NS's P/E ratio is 23.53. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to STERTOOLS.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to STERTOOLS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check STERTOOLS.NS's competition here
TIMKEN.NS vs KPT.BO Comparison April 2026
TIMKEN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 262.4B. In comparison, KPT.BO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,470.80, while KPT.BO trades at ₹508.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.86, whereas KPT.BO's P/E ratio is 14.94. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to KPT.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to KPT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check KPT.BO's competition here
TIMKEN.NS vs AAIL.BO Comparison April 2026
TIMKEN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 262.4B. In comparison, AAIL.BO has a market cap of 997.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,470.80, while AAIL.BO trades at ₹90.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.86, whereas AAIL.BO's P/E ratio is 37.59. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to AAIL.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to AAIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check AAIL.BO's competition here
TIMKEN.NS vs NIBL.NS Comparison April 2026
TIMKEN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 262.4B. In comparison, NIBL.NS has a market cap of 713.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,470.80, while NIBL.NS trades at ₹28.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.86, whereas NIBL.NS's P/E ratio is 4.33. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NIBL.NS's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to NIBL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check NIBL.NS's competition here
TIMKEN.NS vs NIBL.BO Comparison April 2026
TIMKEN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 262.4B. In comparison, NIBL.BO has a market cap of 705.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,470.80, while NIBL.BO trades at ₹29.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.86, whereas NIBL.BO's P/E ratio is 4.20. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to NIBL.BO's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to NIBL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check NIBL.BO's competition here
TIMKEN.NS vs TAPARIA.BO Comparison April 2026
TIMKEN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 262.4B. In comparison, TAPARIA.BO has a market cap of 381.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,470.80, while TAPARIA.BO trades at ₹25.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.86, whereas TAPARIA.BO's P/E ratio is 0.27. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to TAPARIA.BO's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is more volatile compared to TAPARIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check TAPARIA.BO's competition here
TIMKEN.NS vs JAINEX.BO Comparison April 2026
TIMKEN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 262.4B. In comparison, JAINEX.BO has a market cap of 175.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,470.80, while JAINEX.BO trades at ₹115.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.86, whereas JAINEX.BO's P/E ratio is 39.00. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to JAINEX.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to JAINEX.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check JAINEX.BO's competition here
TIMKEN.NS vs LAKPRE.BO Comparison April 2026
TIMKEN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 262.4B. In comparison, LAKPRE.BO has a market cap of 60.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,470.80, while LAKPRE.BO trades at ₹5.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.86, whereas LAKPRE.BO's P/E ratio is -0.22. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LAKPRE.BO's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to LAKPRE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check LAKPRE.BO's competition here
TIMKEN.NS vs LAKPRE.NS Comparison April 2026
TIMKEN.NS plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TIMKEN.NS stands at 262.4B. In comparison, LAKPRE.NS has a market cap of 58.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TIMKEN.NS is priced at ₹3,470.80, while LAKPRE.NS trades at ₹5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TIMKEN.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 57.86, whereas LAKPRE.NS's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, TIMKEN.NS's ROE is +0.21%, compared to LAKPRE.NS's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, TIMKEN.NS is less volatile compared to LAKPRE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TIMKEN.NS.Check LAKPRE.NS's competition here