TransGlobe Energy Corporation
TransGlobe Energy Corporation TGL.TO Peers
See (TGL.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TGL.TO | $5.06 | -0.39% | 370.88M | 2.18 | $2.32 | N/A |
| CNQ.TO | $43.90 | -2.29% | 92.16B | 12.33 | $3.56 | +4.99% |
| TOU.TO | $65.03 | -0.35% | 24.34B | 19.24 | $3.38 | +2.08% |
| ARX.TO | $27.73 | -0.29% | 16.25B | 12.27 | $2.26 | +2.59% |
| OVV.TO | $54.43 | -0.73% | 14.14B | 16.54 | $3.29 | +3.08% |
| CPG.TO | $11.72 | -0.34% | 7.24B | 23.92 | $0.49 | +5.03% |
| SCR.TO | $27.13 | -2.41% | 5.81B | 9.62 | $2.82 | +2.80% |
| ERF.TO | $26.78 | -3.36% | 5.66B | 10.93 | $2.45 | +1.09% |
| PSK.TO | $23.93 | +0.63% | 5.64B | 25.19 | $0.95 | +4.22% |
| MEG.TO | $21.67 | -1.54% | 5.56B | 9.30 | $2.33 | +1.39% |
Stock Comparison
TGL.TO vs CNQ.TO Comparison
TGL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGL.TO stands at 370.88M. In comparison, CNQ.TO has a market cap of 92.16B. Regarding current trading prices, TGL.TO is priced at $5.06, while CNQ.TO trades at $43.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.18, whereas CNQ.TO's P/E ratio is 12.33. In terms of profitability, TGL.TO's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CNQ.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TGL.TO is more volatile compared to CNQ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGL.TO.
TGL.TO vs TOU.TO Comparison
TGL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGL.TO stands at 370.88M. In comparison, TOU.TO has a market cap of 24.34B. Regarding current trading prices, TGL.TO is priced at $5.06, while TOU.TO trades at $65.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.18, whereas TOU.TO's P/E ratio is 19.24. In terms of profitability, TGL.TO's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TOU.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TGL.TO is more volatile compared to TOU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGL.TO.
TGL.TO vs ARX.TO Comparison
TGL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGL.TO stands at 370.88M. In comparison, ARX.TO has a market cap of 16.25B. Regarding current trading prices, TGL.TO is priced at $5.06, while ARX.TO trades at $27.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.18, whereas ARX.TO's P/E ratio is 12.27. In terms of profitability, TGL.TO's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ARX.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TGL.TO is more volatile compared to ARX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGL.TO.
TGL.TO vs OVV.TO Comparison
TGL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGL.TO stands at 370.88M. In comparison, OVV.TO has a market cap of 14.14B. Regarding current trading prices, TGL.TO is priced at $5.06, while OVV.TO trades at $54.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.18, whereas OVV.TO's P/E ratio is 16.54. In terms of profitability, TGL.TO's ROE is +0.25%, compared to OVV.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TGL.TO is more volatile compared to OVV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGL.TO.
TGL.TO vs CPG.TO Comparison
TGL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGL.TO stands at 370.88M. In comparison, CPG.TO has a market cap of 7.24B. Regarding current trading prices, TGL.TO is priced at $5.06, while CPG.TO trades at $11.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.18, whereas CPG.TO's P/E ratio is 23.92. In terms of profitability, TGL.TO's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CPG.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TGL.TO is more volatile compared to CPG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGL.TO.
TGL.TO vs SCR.TO Comparison
TGL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGL.TO stands at 370.88M. In comparison, SCR.TO has a market cap of 5.81B. Regarding current trading prices, TGL.TO is priced at $5.06, while SCR.TO trades at $27.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.18, whereas SCR.TO's P/E ratio is 9.62. In terms of profitability, TGL.TO's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SCR.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TGL.TO is more volatile compared to SCR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGL.TO.
TGL.TO vs ERF.TO Comparison
TGL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGL.TO stands at 370.88M. In comparison, ERF.TO has a market cap of 5.66B. Regarding current trading prices, TGL.TO is priced at $5.06, while ERF.TO trades at $26.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.18, whereas ERF.TO's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, TGL.TO's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ERF.TO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TGL.TO is more volatile compared to ERF.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGL.TO.
TGL.TO vs PSK.TO Comparison
TGL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGL.TO stands at 370.88M. In comparison, PSK.TO has a market cap of 5.64B. Regarding current trading prices, TGL.TO is priced at $5.06, while PSK.TO trades at $23.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.18, whereas PSK.TO's P/E ratio is 25.19. In terms of profitability, TGL.TO's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PSK.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TGL.TO is more volatile compared to PSK.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGL.TO.
TGL.TO vs MEG.TO Comparison
TGL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGL.TO stands at 370.88M. In comparison, MEG.TO has a market cap of 5.56B. Regarding current trading prices, TGL.TO is priced at $5.06, while MEG.TO trades at $21.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.18, whereas MEG.TO's P/E ratio is 9.30. In terms of profitability, TGL.TO's ROE is +0.25%, compared to MEG.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TGL.TO is more volatile compared to MEG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGL.TO.
TGL.TO vs WCP.TO Comparison
TGL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGL.TO stands at 370.88M. In comparison, WCP.TO has a market cap of 5.01B. Regarding current trading prices, TGL.TO is priced at $5.06, while WCP.TO trades at $8.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.18, whereas WCP.TO's P/E ratio is 5.75. In terms of profitability, TGL.TO's ROE is +0.25%, compared to WCP.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TGL.TO is more volatile compared to WCP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGL.TO.
TGL.TO vs PEY.TO Comparison
TGL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGL.TO stands at 370.88M. In comparison, PEY.TO has a market cap of 3.83B. Regarding current trading prices, TGL.TO is priced at $5.06, while PEY.TO trades at $19.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.18, whereas PEY.TO's P/E ratio is 13.55. In terms of profitability, TGL.TO's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PEY.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TGL.TO is more volatile compared to PEY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGL.TO.
TGL.TO vs NVA.TO Comparison
TGL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGL.TO stands at 370.88M. In comparison, NVA.TO has a market cap of 2.77B. Regarding current trading prices, TGL.TO is priced at $5.06, while NVA.TO trades at $13.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.18, whereas NVA.TO's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, TGL.TO's ROE is +0.25%, compared to NVA.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TGL.TO is more volatile compared to NVA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGL.TO.
TGL.TO vs POU.TO Comparison
TGL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGL.TO stands at 370.88M. In comparison, POU.TO has a market cap of 2.70B. Regarding current trading prices, TGL.TO is priced at $5.06, while POU.TO trades at $18.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.18, whereas POU.TO's P/E ratio is 8.36. In terms of profitability, TGL.TO's ROE is +0.25%, compared to POU.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TGL.TO is more volatile compared to POU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGL.TO.
TGL.TO vs ATH.TO Comparison
TGL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGL.TO stands at 370.88M. In comparison, ATH.TO has a market cap of 2.51B. Regarding current trading prices, TGL.TO is priced at $5.06, while ATH.TO trades at $5.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.18, whereas ATH.TO's P/E ratio is 5.43. In terms of profitability, TGL.TO's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ATH.TO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TGL.TO is more volatile compared to ATH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGL.TO.
TGL.TO vs IPCO.TO Comparison
TGL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGL.TO stands at 370.88M. In comparison, IPCO.TO has a market cap of 2.34B. Regarding current trading prices, TGL.TO is priced at $5.06, while IPCO.TO trades at $19.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.18, whereas IPCO.TO's P/E ratio is 21.02. In terms of profitability, TGL.TO's ROE is +0.25%, compared to IPCO.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TGL.TO is more volatile compared to IPCO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGL.TO.
TGL.TO vs TVE.TO Comparison
TGL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGL.TO stands at 370.88M. In comparison, TVE.TO has a market cap of 2.23B. Regarding current trading prices, TGL.TO is priced at $5.06, while TVE.TO trades at $4.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.18, whereas TVE.TO's P/E ratio is 9.10. In terms of profitability, TGL.TO's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TVE.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TGL.TO is more volatile compared to TVE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGL.TO.
TGL.TO vs FRU.TO Comparison
TGL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGL.TO stands at 370.88M. In comparison, FRU.TO has a market cap of 2.05B. Regarding current trading prices, TGL.TO is priced at $5.06, while FRU.TO trades at $12.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.18, whereas FRU.TO's P/E ratio is 12.79. In terms of profitability, TGL.TO's ROE is +0.25%, compared to FRU.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TGL.TO is more volatile compared to FRU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGL.TO.
TGL.TO vs BTE.TO Comparison
TGL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGL.TO stands at 370.88M. In comparison, BTE.TO has a market cap of 1.95B. Regarding current trading prices, TGL.TO is priced at $5.06, while BTE.TO trades at $2.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.18, whereas BTE.TO's P/E ratio is 6.32. In terms of profitability, TGL.TO's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BTE.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TGL.TO is more volatile compared to BTE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGL.TO.
TGL.TO vs AAV.TO Comparison
TGL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGL.TO stands at 370.88M. In comparison, AAV.TO has a market cap of 1.80B. Regarding current trading prices, TGL.TO is priced at $5.06, while AAV.TO trades at $10.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.18, whereas AAV.TO's P/E ratio is -59.94. In terms of profitability, TGL.TO's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AAV.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TGL.TO is more volatile compared to AAV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGL.TO.
TGL.TO vs BIR.TO Comparison
TGL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGL.TO stands at 370.88M. In comparison, BIR.TO has a market cap of 1.76B. Regarding current trading prices, TGL.TO is priced at $5.06, while BIR.TO trades at $6.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.18, whereas BIR.TO's P/E ratio is 30.79. In terms of profitability, TGL.TO's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BIR.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TGL.TO is more volatile compared to BIR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGL.TO.
TGL.TO vs VET.TO Comparison
TGL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGL.TO stands at 370.88M. In comparison, VET.TO has a market cap of 1.53B. Regarding current trading prices, TGL.TO is priced at $5.06, while VET.TO trades at $9.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.18, whereas VET.TO's P/E ratio is -47.10. In terms of profitability, TGL.TO's ROE is +0.25%, compared to VET.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TGL.TO is more volatile compared to VET.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGL.TO.
TGL.TO vs HWX.TO Comparison
TGL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGL.TO stands at 370.88M. In comparison, HWX.TO has a market cap of 1.51B. Regarding current trading prices, TGL.TO is priced at $5.06, while HWX.TO trades at $6.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.18, whereas HWX.TO's P/E ratio is 7.45. In terms of profitability, TGL.TO's ROE is +0.25%, compared to HWX.TO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TGL.TO is more volatile compared to HWX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGL.TO.
TGL.TO vs PXT.TO Comparison
TGL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGL.TO stands at 370.88M. In comparison, PXT.TO has a market cap of 1.26B. Regarding current trading prices, TGL.TO is priced at $5.06, while PXT.TO trades at $12.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.18, whereas PXT.TO's P/E ratio is 10.96. In terms of profitability, TGL.TO's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PXT.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TGL.TO is more volatile compared to PXT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGL.TO.
TGL.TO vs KEL.TO Comparison
TGL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGL.TO stands at 370.88M. In comparison, KEL.TO has a market cap of 1.25B. Regarding current trading prices, TGL.TO is priced at $5.06, while KEL.TO trades at $6.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.18, whereas KEL.TO's P/E ratio is 24.15. In terms of profitability, TGL.TO's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KEL.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TGL.TO is more volatile compared to KEL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGL.TO.
TGL.TO vs AOI.TO Comparison
TGL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGL.TO stands at 370.88M. In comparison, AOI.TO has a market cap of 1.24B. Regarding current trading prices, TGL.TO is priced at $5.06, while AOI.TO trades at $1.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.18, whereas AOI.TO's P/E ratio is -2.14. In terms of profitability, TGL.TO's ROE is +0.25%, compared to AOI.TO's ROE of -0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TGL.TO is more volatile compared to AOI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGL.TO.
TGL.TO vs CR.TO Comparison
TGL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGL.TO stands at 370.88M. In comparison, CR.TO has a market cap of 1.16B. Regarding current trading prices, TGL.TO is priced at $5.06, while CR.TO trades at $7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.18, whereas CR.TO's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, TGL.TO's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CR.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TGL.TO is more volatile compared to CR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGL.TO.
TGL.TO vs CJ.TO Comparison
TGL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGL.TO stands at 370.88M. In comparison, CJ.TO has a market cap of 1.00B. Regarding current trading prices, TGL.TO is priced at $5.06, while CJ.TO trades at $6.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.18, whereas CJ.TO's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, TGL.TO's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CJ.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TGL.TO is more volatile compared to CJ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGL.TO.
TGL.TO vs VLE.TO Comparison
TGL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGL.TO stands at 370.88M. In comparison, VLE.TO has a market cap of 835.34M. Regarding current trading prices, TGL.TO is priced at $5.06, while VLE.TO trades at $7.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.18, whereas VLE.TO's P/E ratio is 13.10. In terms of profitability, TGL.TO's ROE is +0.25%, compared to VLE.TO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TGL.TO is more volatile compared to VLE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGL.TO.
TGL.TO vs KEC.TO Comparison
TGL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGL.TO stands at 370.88M. In comparison, KEC.TO has a market cap of 733.39M. Regarding current trading prices, TGL.TO is priced at $5.06, while KEC.TO trades at $16.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.18, whereas KEC.TO's P/E ratio is 16.75. In terms of profitability, TGL.TO's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KEC.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TGL.TO is more volatile compared to KEC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGL.TO.
TGL.TO vs BIR-PA.TO Comparison
TGL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGL.TO stands at 370.88M. In comparison, BIR-PA.TO has a market cap of 726.50M. Regarding current trading prices, TGL.TO is priced at $5.06, while BIR-PA.TO trades at $24.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.18, whereas BIR-PA.TO's P/E ratio is 16.62. In terms of profitability, TGL.TO's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BIR-PA.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TGL.TO is more volatile compared to BIR-PA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGL.TO.
TGL.TO vs SDE.TO Comparison
TGL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGL.TO stands at 370.88M. In comparison, SDE.TO has a market cap of 570.12M. Regarding current trading prices, TGL.TO is priced at $5.06, while SDE.TO trades at $2.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.18, whereas SDE.TO's P/E ratio is 25.91. In terms of profitability, TGL.TO's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SDE.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TGL.TO is more volatile compared to SDE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGL.TO.
TGL.TO vs PIPE.TO Comparison
TGL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGL.TO stands at 370.88M. In comparison, PIPE.TO has a market cap of 542.50M. Regarding current trading prices, TGL.TO is priced at $5.06, while PIPE.TO trades at $1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.18, whereas PIPE.TO's P/E ratio is 3.03. In terms of profitability, TGL.TO's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PIPE.TO's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, TGL.TO is more volatile compared to PIPE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGL.TO.
TGL.TO vs TAL.TO Comparison
TGL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGL.TO stands at 370.88M. In comparison, TAL.TO has a market cap of 540.56M. Regarding current trading prices, TGL.TO is priced at $5.06, while TAL.TO trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.18, whereas TAL.TO's P/E ratio is 3.47. In terms of profitability, TGL.TO's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TAL.TO's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TGL.TO is more volatile compared to TAL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGL.TO.
TGL.TO vs OBE.TO Comparison
TGL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGL.TO stands at 370.88M. In comparison, OBE.TO has a market cap of 512.11M. Regarding current trading prices, TGL.TO is priced at $5.06, while OBE.TO trades at $6.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.18, whereas OBE.TO's P/E ratio is -2.65. In terms of profitability, TGL.TO's ROE is +0.25%, compared to OBE.TO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TGL.TO is more volatile compared to OBE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGL.TO.
TGL.TO vs GFR.TO Comparison
TGL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGL.TO stands at 370.88M. In comparison, GFR.TO has a market cap of 414.64M. Regarding current trading prices, TGL.TO is priced at $5.06, while GFR.TO trades at $5.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.18, whereas GFR.TO's P/E ratio is 2.27. In terms of profitability, TGL.TO's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GFR.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TGL.TO is more volatile compared to GFR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGL.TO.
TGL.TO vs TNZ.TO Comparison
TGL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGL.TO stands at 370.88M. In comparison, TNZ.TO has a market cap of 410.85M. Regarding current trading prices, TGL.TO is priced at $5.06, while TNZ.TO trades at $14.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.18, whereas TNZ.TO's P/E ratio is -53.21. In terms of profitability, TGL.TO's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TNZ.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TGL.TO is more volatile compared to TNZ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGL.TO.
TGL.TO vs FEC.TO Comparison
TGL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGL.TO stands at 370.88M. In comparison, FEC.TO has a market cap of 394.20M. Regarding current trading prices, TGL.TO is priced at $5.06, while FEC.TO trades at $5.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.18, whereas FEC.TO's P/E ratio is 24.29. In terms of profitability, TGL.TO's ROE is +0.25%, compared to FEC.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TGL.TO is more volatile compared to FEC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGL.TO.
TGL.TO vs SOIL.TO Comparison
TGL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGL.TO stands at 370.88M. In comparison, SOIL.TO has a market cap of 358.98M. Regarding current trading prices, TGL.TO is priced at $5.06, while SOIL.TO trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.18, whereas SOIL.TO's P/E ratio is 2.02. In terms of profitability, TGL.TO's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SOIL.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TGL.TO is more volatile compared to SOIL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGL.TO.
TGL.TO vs KEI.TO Comparison
TGL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGL.TO stands at 370.88M. In comparison, KEI.TO has a market cap of 347.44M. Regarding current trading prices, TGL.TO is priced at $5.06, while KEI.TO trades at $9.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.18, whereas KEI.TO's P/E ratio is 13.99. In terms of profitability, TGL.TO's ROE is +0.25%, compared to KEI.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TGL.TO is less volatile compared to KEI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGL.TO.
TGL.TO vs ITE.TO Comparison
TGL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGL.TO stands at 370.88M. In comparison, ITE.TO has a market cap of 276.56M. Regarding current trading prices, TGL.TO is priced at $5.06, while ITE.TO trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.18, whereas ITE.TO's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, TGL.TO's ROE is +0.25%, compared to ITE.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TGL.TO is more volatile compared to ITE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGL.TO.
TGL.TO vs GTE.TO Comparison
TGL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGL.TO stands at 370.88M. In comparison, GTE.TO has a market cap of 250.48M. Regarding current trading prices, TGL.TO is priced at $5.06, while GTE.TO trades at $7.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.18, whereas GTE.TO's P/E ratio is -11.62. In terms of profitability, TGL.TO's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GTE.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TGL.TO is more volatile compared to GTE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGL.TO.
TGL.TO vs IPO.TO Comparison
TGL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGL.TO stands at 370.88M. In comparison, IPO.TO has a market cap of 234.41M. Regarding current trading prices, TGL.TO is priced at $5.06, while IPO.TO trades at $8.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.18, whereas IPO.TO's P/E ratio is 27.97. In terms of profitability, TGL.TO's ROE is +0.25%, compared to IPO.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TGL.TO is more volatile compared to IPO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGL.TO.
TGL.TO vs PNE.TO Comparison
TGL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGL.TO stands at 370.88M. In comparison, PNE.TO has a market cap of 207.85M. Regarding current trading prices, TGL.TO is priced at $5.06, while PNE.TO trades at $0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.18, whereas PNE.TO's P/E ratio is -9.67. In terms of profitability, TGL.TO's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PNE.TO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TGL.TO is more volatile compared to PNE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGL.TO.
TGL.TO vs RBY.TO Comparison
TGL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGL.TO stands at 370.88M. In comparison, RBY.TO has a market cap of 171.87M. Regarding current trading prices, TGL.TO is priced at $5.06, while RBY.TO trades at $1.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.18, whereas RBY.TO's P/E ratio is 2.31. In terms of profitability, TGL.TO's ROE is +0.25%, compared to RBY.TO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TGL.TO is more volatile compared to RBY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGL.TO.
TGL.TO vs PRQ.TO Comparison
TGL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGL.TO stands at 370.88M. In comparison, PRQ.TO has a market cap of 170.52M. Regarding current trading prices, TGL.TO is priced at $5.06, while PRQ.TO trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.18, whereas PRQ.TO's P/E ratio is 133.00. In terms of profitability, TGL.TO's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PRQ.TO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TGL.TO is more volatile compared to PRQ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGL.TO.
TGL.TO vs CDR.TO Comparison
TGL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGL.TO stands at 370.88M. In comparison, CDR.TO has a market cap of 126.84M. Regarding current trading prices, TGL.TO is priced at $5.06, while CDR.TO trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.18, whereas CDR.TO's P/E ratio is -26.86. In terms of profitability, TGL.TO's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CDR.TO's ROE of -3.66%. Regarding short-term risk, TGL.TO is more volatile compared to CDR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGL.TO.
TGL.TO vs GXE.TO Comparison
TGL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGL.TO stands at 370.88M. In comparison, GXE.TO has a market cap of 126.52M. Regarding current trading prices, TGL.TO is priced at $5.06, while GXE.TO trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.18, whereas GXE.TO's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, TGL.TO's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GXE.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TGL.TO is more volatile compared to GXE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGL.TO.
TGL.TO vs BNE.TO Comparison
TGL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGL.TO stands at 370.88M. In comparison, BNE.TO has a market cap of 125.78M. Regarding current trading prices, TGL.TO is priced at $5.06, while BNE.TO trades at $3.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.18, whereas BNE.TO's P/E ratio is 12.48. In terms of profitability, TGL.TO's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BNE.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TGL.TO is more volatile compared to BNE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGL.TO.
TGL.TO vs JOY.TO Comparison
TGL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGL.TO stands at 370.88M. In comparison, JOY.TO has a market cap of 110.06M. Regarding current trading prices, TGL.TO is priced at $5.06, while JOY.TO trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.18, whereas JOY.TO's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, TGL.TO's ROE is +0.25%, compared to JOY.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TGL.TO is more volatile compared to JOY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGL.TO.
TGL.TO vs CNE.TO Comparison
TGL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGL.TO stands at 370.88M. In comparison, CNE.TO has a market cap of 101.68M. Regarding current trading prices, TGL.TO is priced at $5.06, while CNE.TO trades at $2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.18, whereas CNE.TO's P/E ratio is -2.22. In terms of profitability, TGL.TO's ROE is +0.25%, compared to CNE.TO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TGL.TO is more volatile compared to CNE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGL.TO.
TGL.TO vs QEC.TO Comparison
TGL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGL.TO stands at 370.88M. In comparison, QEC.TO has a market cap of 98.56M. Regarding current trading prices, TGL.TO is priced at $5.06, while QEC.TO trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.18, whereas QEC.TO's P/E ratio is -11.50. In terms of profitability, TGL.TO's ROE is +0.25%, compared to QEC.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TGL.TO is more volatile compared to QEC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGL.TO.
TGL.TO vs YGR.TO Comparison
TGL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGL.TO stands at 370.88M. In comparison, YGR.TO has a market cap of 96.66M. Regarding current trading prices, TGL.TO is priced at $5.06, while YGR.TO trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.18, whereas YGR.TO's P/E ratio is 4.57. In terms of profitability, TGL.TO's ROE is +0.25%, compared to YGR.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TGL.TO is more volatile compared to YGR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGL.TO.
TGL.TO vs PEA.TO Comparison
TGL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGL.TO stands at 370.88M. In comparison, PEA.TO has a market cap of 95.83M. Regarding current trading prices, TGL.TO is priced at $5.06, while PEA.TO trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.18, whereas PEA.TO's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, TGL.TO's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PEA.TO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TGL.TO is more volatile compared to PEA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGL.TO.
TGL.TO vs FORZ.TO Comparison
TGL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGL.TO stands at 370.88M. In comparison, FORZ.TO has a market cap of 90.79M. Regarding current trading prices, TGL.TO is priced at $5.06, while FORZ.TO trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.18, whereas FORZ.TO's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, TGL.TO's ROE is +0.25%, compared to FORZ.TO's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, TGL.TO is more volatile compared to FORZ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGL.TO.
TGL.TO vs TXP.TO Comparison
TGL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGL.TO stands at 370.88M. In comparison, TXP.TO has a market cap of 86.31M. Regarding current trading prices, TGL.TO is priced at $5.06, while TXP.TO trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.18, whereas TXP.TO's P/E ratio is -5.21. In terms of profitability, TGL.TO's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TXP.TO's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TGL.TO is more volatile compared to TXP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGL.TO.
TGL.TO vs PPR.TO Comparison
TGL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGL.TO stands at 370.88M. In comparison, PPR.TO has a market cap of 49.05M. Regarding current trading prices, TGL.TO is priced at $5.06, while PPR.TO trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.18, whereas PPR.TO's P/E ratio is -1.75. In terms of profitability, TGL.TO's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PPR.TO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, TGL.TO is more volatile compared to PPR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGL.TO.
TGL.TO vs PMT.TO Comparison
TGL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGL.TO stands at 370.88M. In comparison, PMT.TO has a market cap of 26.74M. Regarding current trading prices, TGL.TO is priced at $5.06, while PMT.TO trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.18, whereas PMT.TO's P/E ratio is -2.47. In terms of profitability, TGL.TO's ROE is +0.25%, compared to PMT.TO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TGL.TO is more volatile compared to PMT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGL.TO.
TGL.TO vs XOP.CN Comparison
TGL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGL.TO stands at 370.88M. In comparison, XOP.CN has a market cap of 18.35M. Regarding current trading prices, TGL.TO is priced at $5.06, while XOP.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.18, whereas XOP.CN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, TGL.TO's ROE is +0.25%, compared to XOP.CN's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. TGL.TO has daily volatility of 8.20 and XOP.CN has daily volatility of N/A.
TGL.TO vs TCF.CN Comparison
TGL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGL.TO stands at 370.88M. In comparison, TCF.CN has a market cap of 6.52M. Regarding current trading prices, TGL.TO is priced at $5.06, while TCF.CN trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.18, whereas TCF.CN's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, TGL.TO's ROE is +0.25%, compared to TCF.CN's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, TGL.TO is more volatile compared to TCF.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGL.TO.
TGL.TO vs BNG.TO Comparison
TGL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGL.TO stands at 370.88M. In comparison, BNG.TO has a market cap of 4.85M. Regarding current trading prices, TGL.TO is priced at $5.06, while BNG.TO trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.18, whereas BNG.TO's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, TGL.TO's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BNG.TO's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TGL.TO is less volatile compared to BNG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGL.TO.
TGL.TO vs SQX.CN Comparison
TGL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGL.TO stands at 370.88M. In comparison, SQX.CN has a market cap of 3.10M. Regarding current trading prices, TGL.TO is priced at $5.06, while SQX.CN trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.18, whereas SQX.CN's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, TGL.TO's ROE is +0.25%, compared to SQX.CN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TGL.TO is more volatile compared to SQX.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGL.TO.
TGL.TO vs OIL.CN Comparison
TGL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGL.TO stands at 370.88M. In comparison, OIL.CN has a market cap of 1.82M. Regarding current trading prices, TGL.TO is priced at $5.06, while OIL.CN trades at $3.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.18, whereas OIL.CN's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, TGL.TO's ROE is +0.25%, compared to OIL.CN's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TGL.TO is more volatile compared to OIL.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGL.TO.
TGL.TO vs JBR.CN Comparison
TGL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGL.TO stands at 370.88M. In comparison, JBR.CN has a market cap of 1.62M. Regarding current trading prices, TGL.TO is priced at $5.06, while JBR.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.18, whereas JBR.CN's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, TGL.TO's ROE is +0.25%, compared to JBR.CN's ROE of +0.85%. Regarding short-term risk, TGL.TO is more volatile compared to JBR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGL.TO.
TGL.TO vs BDR.CN Comparison
TGL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGL.TO stands at 370.88M. In comparison, BDR.CN has a market cap of 1.09M. Regarding current trading prices, TGL.TO is priced at $5.06, while BDR.CN trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.18, whereas BDR.CN's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, TGL.TO's ROE is +0.25%, compared to BDR.CN's ROE of +0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, TGL.TO is more volatile compared to BDR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGL.TO.
TGL.TO vs VIK.CN Comparison
TGL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGL.TO stands at 370.88M. In comparison, VIK.CN has a market cap of 917420.00. Regarding current trading prices, TGL.TO is priced at $5.06, while VIK.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.18, whereas VIK.CN's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, TGL.TO's ROE is +0.25%, compared to VIK.CN's ROE of -1.44%. Regarding short-term risk, TGL.TO is more volatile compared to VIK.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGL.TO.
TGL.TO vs WOGC.CN Comparison
TGL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGL.TO stands at 370.88M. In comparison, WOGC.CN has a market cap of 791812.00. Regarding current trading prices, TGL.TO is priced at $5.06, while WOGC.CN trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.18, whereas WOGC.CN's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, TGL.TO's ROE is +0.25%, compared to WOGC.CN's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, TGL.TO is more volatile compared to WOGC.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGL.TO.
TGL.TO vs GTOO.CN Comparison
TGL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGL.TO stands at 370.88M. In comparison, GTOO.CN has a market cap of 520922.00. Regarding current trading prices, TGL.TO is priced at $5.06, while GTOO.CN trades at $0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.18, whereas GTOO.CN's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, TGL.TO's ROE is +0.25%, compared to GTOO.CN's ROE of +3.71%. Regarding short-term risk, TGL.TO is more volatile compared to GTOO.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGL.TO.
TGL.TO vs EI.CN Comparison
TGL.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TGL.TO stands at 370.88M. In comparison, EI.CN has a market cap of 466583.00. Regarding current trading prices, TGL.TO is priced at $5.06, while EI.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TGL.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 2.18, whereas EI.CN's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, TGL.TO's ROE is +0.25%, compared to EI.CN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TGL.TO is more volatile compared to EI.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TGL.TO.