Kolibri Global Energy Inc. (KEI.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KEI.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KEI.TO | CA$7.48 | -5.08% | 265.3M | 14.38 | CA$0.52 | N/A |
| CNQ.TO | CA$63.76 | -3.71% | 133B | 11.37 | CA$5.61 | +3.73% |
| TOU.TO | CA$63.73 | -2.58% | 24.7B | 35.21 | CA$1.81 | +4.08% |
| OVV.TO | CA$79.10 | -3.93% | 22.2B | 18.83 | CA$4.20 | +2.07% |
| WCP.TO | CA$16.51 | -3.79% | 20B | 22.62 | CA$0.73 | +4.40% |
| ARX.TO | CA$31.69 | -0.81% | 17.9B | 12.53 | CA$2.53 | +2.52% |
| SCR.TO | CA$47.67 | -1.45% | 10.2B | 40.40 | CA$1.18 | +23.36% |
| PSK.TO | CA$34.14 | -1.87% | 7.9B | 39.70 | CA$0.86 | +3.05% |
| MEG.TO | CA$30.89 | +0.72% | 7.9B | 14.64 | CA$2.11 | +0.68% |
| CPG.TO | CA$11.72 | -0.34% | 7.2B | 23.92 | CA$0.49 | +4.01% |
Stock Comparison
KEI.TO vs CNQ.TO Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, CNQ.TO has a market cap of 133B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while CNQ.TO trades at CA$63.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas CNQ.TO's P/E ratio is 11.37. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CNQ.TO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is more volatile compared to CNQ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check CNQ.TO's competition here
KEI.TO vs TOU.TO Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, TOU.TO has a market cap of 24.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while TOU.TO trades at CA$63.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas TOU.TO's P/E ratio is 35.21. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TOU.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is more volatile compared to TOU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check TOU.TO's competition here
KEI.TO vs OVV.TO Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, OVV.TO has a market cap of 22.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while OVV.TO trades at CA$79.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas OVV.TO's P/E ratio is 18.83. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OVV.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is more volatile compared to OVV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check OVV.TO's competition here
KEI.TO vs WCP.TO Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, WCP.TO has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while WCP.TO trades at CA$16.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas WCP.TO's P/E ratio is 22.62. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WCP.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is more volatile compared to WCP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check WCP.TO's competition here
KEI.TO vs ARX.TO Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, ARX.TO has a market cap of 17.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while ARX.TO trades at CA$31.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas ARX.TO's P/E ratio is 12.53. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ARX.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is more volatile compared to ARX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check ARX.TO's competition here
KEI.TO vs SCR.TO Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, SCR.TO has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while SCR.TO trades at CA$47.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas SCR.TO's P/E ratio is 40.40. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SCR.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is more volatile compared to SCR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check SCR.TO's competition here
KEI.TO vs PSK.TO Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, PSK.TO has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while PSK.TO trades at CA$34.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas PSK.TO's P/E ratio is 39.70. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PSK.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is more volatile compared to PSK.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check PSK.TO's competition here
KEI.TO vs MEG.TO Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, MEG.TO has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while MEG.TO trades at CA$30.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas MEG.TO's P/E ratio is 14.64. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MEG.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is more volatile compared to MEG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check MEG.TO's competition here
KEI.TO vs CPG.TO Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, CPG.TO has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while CPG.TO trades at CA$11.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas CPG.TO's P/E ratio is 23.92. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CPG.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is more volatile compared to CPG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check CPG.TO's competition here
KEI.TO vs TVE.TO Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, TVE.TO has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while TVE.TO trades at CA$13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas TVE.TO's P/E ratio is -73.89. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TVE.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is more volatile compared to TVE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check TVE.TO's competition here
KEI.TO vs ERF.TO Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, ERF.TO has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while ERF.TO trades at CA$26.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas ERF.TO's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ERF.TO's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is less volatile compared to ERF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check ERF.TO's competition here
KEI.TO vs VRN.TO Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, VRN.TO has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while VRN.TO trades at CA$9.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas VRN.TO's P/E ratio is 19.87. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VRN.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is more volatile compared to VRN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check VRN.TO's competition here
KEI.TO vs ATH.TO Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, ATH.TO has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while ATH.TO trades at CA$11.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas ATH.TO's P/E ratio is 25.47. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ATH.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is more volatile compared to ATH.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check ATH.TO's competition here
KEI.TO vs PEY.TO Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, PEY.TO has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while PEY.TO trades at CA$25.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas PEY.TO's P/E ratio is 10.92. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PEY.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is more volatile compared to PEY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check PEY.TO's competition here
KEI.TO vs BTE.TO Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, BTE.TO has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while BTE.TO trades at CA$6.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas BTE.TO's P/E ratio is -14.78. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BTE.TO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is more volatile compared to BTE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check BTE.TO's competition here
KEI.TO vs POU.TO Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, POU.TO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while POU.TO trades at CA$30.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas POU.TO's P/E ratio is 75.18. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to POU.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is more volatile compared to POU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check POU.TO's competition here
KEI.TO vs IPCO.TO Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, IPCO.TO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while IPCO.TO trades at CA$35.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas IPCO.TO's P/E ratio is 117.50. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IPCO.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is more volatile compared to IPCO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check IPCO.TO's competition here
KEI.TO vs NVA.TO Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, NVA.TO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while NVA.TO trades at CA$19.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas NVA.TO's P/E ratio is 11.83. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NVA.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is more volatile compared to NVA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check NVA.TO's competition here
KEI.TO vs HWX.TO Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, HWX.TO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while HWX.TO trades at CA$12.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas HWX.TO's P/E ratio is 22.29. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HWX.TO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is more volatile compared to HWX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check HWX.TO's competition here
KEI.TO vs FRU.TO Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, FRU.TO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while FRU.TO trades at CA$17.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas FRU.TO's P/E ratio is 31.85. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FRU.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is more volatile compared to FRU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check FRU.TO's competition here
KEI.TO vs PXT.TO Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, PXT.TO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while PXT.TO trades at CA$26.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas PXT.TO's P/E ratio is 10.32. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PXT.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is more volatile compared to PXT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check PXT.TO's competition here
KEI.TO vs VET.TO Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, VET.TO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while VET.TO trades at CA$15.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas VET.TO's P/E ratio is -4.77. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VET.TO's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is more volatile compared to VET.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check VET.TO's competition here
KEI.TO vs SDE.TO Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, SDE.TO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while SDE.TO trades at CA$12.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas SDE.TO's P/E ratio is 38.97. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SDE.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is less volatile compared to SDE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check SDE.TO's competition here
KEI.TO vs CJ.TO Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, CJ.TO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while CJ.TO trades at CA$11.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas CJ.TO's P/E ratio is 196.50. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CJ.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is more volatile compared to CJ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check CJ.TO's competition here
KEI.TO vs KEL.TO Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, KEL.TO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while KEL.TO trades at CA$9.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas KEL.TO's P/E ratio is 44.18. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KEL.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is more volatile compared to KEL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check KEL.TO's competition here
KEI.TO vs BIR.TO Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, BIR.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while BIR.TO trades at CA$6.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas BIR.TO's P/E ratio is 25.84. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BIR.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is more volatile compared to BIR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check BIR.TO's competition here
KEI.TO vs AAV.TO Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, AAV.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while AAV.TO trades at CA$10.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas AAV.TO's P/E ratio is 15.42. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AAV.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is more volatile compared to AAV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check AAV.TO's competition here
KEI.TO vs TNZ.TO Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, TNZ.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while TNZ.TO trades at CA$50.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas TNZ.TO's P/E ratio is 7.54. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TNZ.TO's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is less volatile compared to TNZ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check TNZ.TO's competition here
KEI.TO vs MER.TO Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, MER.TO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while MER.TO trades at CA$2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas MER.TO's P/E ratio is -7.30. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MER.TO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is more volatile compared to MER.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check MER.TO's competition here
KEI.TO vs SOIL.TO Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, SOIL.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while SOIL.TO trades at CA$7.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas SOIL.TO's P/E ratio is 70.50. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SOIL.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is less volatile compared to SOIL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check SOIL.TO's competition here
KEI.TO vs AOI.TO Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, AOI.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while AOI.TO trades at CA$1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas AOI.TO's P/E ratio is -2.58. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AOI.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is more volatile compared to AOI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check AOI.TO's competition here
KEI.TO vs VLE.TO Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, VLE.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while VLE.TO trades at CA$11.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas VLE.TO's P/E ratio is 62.00. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VLE.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is more volatile compared to VLE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check VLE.TO's competition here
KEI.TO vs CR.TO Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, CR.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while CR.TO trades at CA$7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas CR.TO's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CR.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is more volatile compared to CR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check CR.TO's competition here
KEI.TO vs FEC.TO Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, FEC.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while FEC.TO trades at CA$16.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas FEC.TO's P/E ratio is -0.85. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FEC.TO's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is more volatile compared to FEC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check FEC.TO's competition here
KEI.TO vs KEC.TO Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, KEC.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while KEC.TO trades at CA$24.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas KEC.TO's P/E ratio is 9.59. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KEC.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is more volatile compared to KEC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check KEC.TO's competition here
KEI.TO vs OBE.TO Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, OBE.TO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while OBE.TO trades at CA$15.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas OBE.TO's P/E ratio is 1544.00. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OBE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is less volatile compared to OBE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check OBE.TO's competition here
KEI.TO vs SGY.TO Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, SGY.TO has a market cap of 990.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while SGY.TO trades at CA$10.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas SGY.TO's P/E ratio is 143.86. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SGY.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is more volatile compared to SGY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check SGY.TO's competition here
KEI.TO vs BIR-PA.TO Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, BIR-PA.TO has a market cap of 726.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while BIR-PA.TO trades at CA$24.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas BIR-PA.TO's P/E ratio is 16.62. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BIR-PA.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is more volatile compared to BIR-PA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check BIR-PA.TO's competition here
KEI.TO vs GFR.TO Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, GFR.TO has a market cap of 572.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while GFR.TO trades at CA$7.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas GFR.TO's P/E ratio is -52.73. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GFR.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is more volatile compared to GFR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check GFR.TO's competition here
KEI.TO vs PIPE.TO Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, PIPE.TO has a market cap of 542.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while PIPE.TO trades at CA$1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas PIPE.TO's P/E ratio is 3.03. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PIPE.TO's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is more volatile compared to PIPE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check PIPE.TO's competition here
KEI.TO vs TAL.TO Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, TAL.TO has a market cap of 524.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while TAL.TO trades at CA$0.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas TAL.TO's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TAL.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is more volatile compared to TAL.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check TAL.TO's competition here
KEI.TO vs CVVY.TO Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, CVVY.TO has a market cap of 494.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while CVVY.TO trades at CA$1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas CVVY.TO's P/E ratio is -80.00. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CVVY.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is more volatile compared to CVVY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check CVVY.TO's competition here
KEI.TO vs GASX.V Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, GASX.V has a market cap of 466.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while GASX.V trades at CA$1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas GASX.V's P/E ratio is -14.42. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GASX.V's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is less volatile compared to GASX.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check GASX.V's competition here
KEI.TO vs IPO.TO Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, IPO.TO has a market cap of 465.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while IPO.TO trades at CA$16.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas IPO.TO's P/E ratio is -12.12. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IPO.TO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is more volatile compared to IPO.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check IPO.TO's competition here
KEI.TO vs GASX.TO Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, GASX.TO has a market cap of 429.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while GASX.TO trades at CA$1.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas GASX.TO's P/E ratio is 9.29. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GASX.TO's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is more volatile compared to GASX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check GASX.TO's competition here
KEI.TO vs JOY.TO Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, JOY.TO has a market cap of 386M. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while JOY.TO trades at CA$5.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas JOY.TO's P/E ratio is 33.65. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JOY.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is less volatile compared to JOY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check JOY.TO's competition here
KEI.TO vs GTE.TO Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, GTE.TO has a market cap of 375.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while GTE.TO trades at CA$10.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas GTE.TO's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GTE.TO's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is less volatile compared to GTE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check GTE.TO's competition here
KEI.TO vs TGL.TO Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, TGL.TO has a market cap of 370.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while TGL.TO trades at CA$5.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas TGL.TO's P/E ratio is 2.18. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TGL.TO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is less volatile compared to TGL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check TGL.TO's competition here
KEI.TO vs RBY.TO Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, RBY.TO has a market cap of 321M. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while RBY.TO trades at CA$3.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas RBY.TO's P/E ratio is 42.88. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RBY.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is more volatile compared to RBY.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check RBY.TO's competition here
KEI.TO vs ITE.TO Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, ITE.TO has a market cap of 276.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while ITE.TO trades at CA$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas ITE.TO's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ITE.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is more volatile compared to ITE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check ITE.TO's competition here
KEI.TO vs PRQ.TO Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, PRQ.TO has a market cap of 259.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while PRQ.TO trades at CA$1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas PRQ.TO's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PRQ.TO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is more volatile compared to PRQ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check PRQ.TO's competition here
KEI.TO vs BNE.TO Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, BNE.TO has a market cap of 235.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while BNE.TO trades at CA$6.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas BNE.TO's P/E ratio is -9.63. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BNE.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is less volatile compared to BNE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check BNE.TO's competition here
KEI.TO vs PNE.TO Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, PNE.TO has a market cap of 226M. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while PNE.TO trades at CA$0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas PNE.TO's P/E ratio is -31.50. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PNE.TO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is more volatile compared to PNE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check PNE.TO's competition here
KEI.TO vs CDR.TO Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, CDR.TO has a market cap of 196.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while CDR.TO trades at CA$2.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas CDR.TO's P/E ratio is -26.09. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CDR.TO's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is less volatile compared to CDR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check CDR.TO's competition here
KEI.TO vs YGR.TO Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, YGR.TO has a market cap of 145.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while YGR.TO trades at CA$1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas YGR.TO's P/E ratio is 10.62. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to YGR.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is more volatile compared to YGR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check YGR.TO's competition here
KEI.TO vs GXE.TO Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, GXE.TO has a market cap of 126.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while GXE.TO trades at CA$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas GXE.TO's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GXE.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is more volatile compared to GXE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check GXE.TO's competition here
KEI.TO vs QEC.TO Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, QEC.TO has a market cap of 122.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while QEC.TO trades at CA$0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas QEC.TO's P/E ratio is -1.23. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to QEC.TO's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is more volatile compared to QEC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check QEC.TO's competition here
KEI.TO vs PEA.TO Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, PEA.TO has a market cap of 95.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while PEA.TO trades at CA$0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas PEA.TO's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PEA.TO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is more volatile compared to PEA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check PEA.TO's competition here
KEI.TO vs FORZ.TO Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, FORZ.TO has a market cap of 90.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while FORZ.TO trades at CA$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas FORZ.TO's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FORZ.TO's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is more volatile compared to FORZ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check FORZ.TO's competition here
KEI.TO vs CNE.TO Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, CNE.TO has a market cap of 52.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while CNE.TO trades at CA$1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas CNE.TO's P/E ratio is 0.98. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CNE.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is more volatile compared to CNE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check CNE.TO's competition here
KEI.TO vs TXP.TO Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, TXP.TO has a market cap of 34.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while TXP.TO trades at CA$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas TXP.TO's P/E ratio is 3.25. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TXP.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is more volatile compared to TXP.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check TXP.TO's competition here
KEI.TO vs PMT.TO Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, PMT.TO has a market cap of 26.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while PMT.TO trades at CA$0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas PMT.TO's P/E ratio is -2.47. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PMT.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is more volatile compared to PMT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check PMT.TO's competition here
KEI.TO vs XOP.CN Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, XOP.CN has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while XOP.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas XOP.CN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to XOP.CN's ROE of -2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. KEI.TO has daily volatility of 5.50 and XOP.CN has daily volatility of N/A.Check XOP.CN's competition here
KEI.TO vs BNG.TO Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, BNG.TO has a market cap of 17M. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while BNG.TO trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas BNG.TO's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BNG.TO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is less volatile compared to BNG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check BNG.TO's competition here
KEI.TO vs ALTU.V Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, ALTU.V has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while ALTU.V trades at CA$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas ALTU.V's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ALTU.V's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is less volatile compared to ALTU.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check ALTU.V's competition here
KEI.TO vs SQX.CN Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, SQX.CN has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while SQX.CN trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas SQX.CN's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SQX.CN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is more volatile compared to SQX.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check SQX.CN's competition here
KEI.TO vs BDR.CN Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, BDR.CN has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while BDR.CN trades at CA$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas BDR.CN's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BDR.CN's ROE of -35.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is less volatile compared to BDR.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check BDR.CN's competition here
KEI.TO vs OIL.CN Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, OIL.CN has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while OIL.CN trades at CA$3.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas OIL.CN's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OIL.CN's ROE of -1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is less volatile compared to OIL.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check OIL.CN's competition here
KEI.TO vs JBR.CN Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, JBR.CN has a market cap of 1.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while JBR.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas JBR.CN's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JBR.CN's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is less volatile compared to JBR.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check JBR.CN's competition here
KEI.TO vs TCF.CN Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, TCF.CN has a market cap of 1.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while TCF.CN trades at CA$0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas TCF.CN's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TCF.CN's ROE of +80.52%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is more volatile compared to TCF.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check TCF.CN's competition here
KEI.TO vs SHP.CN Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, SHP.CN has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while SHP.CN trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas SHP.CN's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SHP.CN's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is less volatile compared to SHP.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check SHP.CN's competition here
KEI.TO vs WOGC.CN Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, WOGC.CN has a market cap of 787.3K. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while WOGC.CN trades at CA$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas WOGC.CN's P/E ratio is -1.77. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WOGC.CN's ROE of -2.46%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is less volatile compared to WOGC.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check WOGC.CN's competition here
KEI.TO vs PPR.TO Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, PPR.TO has a market cap of 778.7K. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while PPR.TO trades at CA$0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas PPR.TO's P/E ratio is -2.17. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PPR.TO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is less volatile compared to PPR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check PPR.TO's competition here
KEI.TO vs GTOO.CN Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, GTOO.CN has a market cap of 520.9K. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while GTOO.CN trades at CA$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas GTOO.CN's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GTOO.CN's ROE of -2.80%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is more volatile compared to GTOO.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check GTOO.CN's competition here
KEI.TO vs EI.CN Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, EI.CN has a market cap of 466.6K. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while EI.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas EI.CN's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EI.CN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is more volatile compared to EI.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check EI.CN's competition here
KEI.TO vs VIK.CN Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, VIK.CN has a market cap of 359K. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while VIK.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas VIK.CN's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VIK.CN's ROE of +0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is less volatile compared to VIK.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check VIK.CN's competition here
KEI.TO vs BIR-PC.TO Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, BIR-PC.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while BIR-PC.TO trades at CA$24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas BIR-PC.TO's P/E ratio is 16.62. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BIR-PC.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is more volatile compared to BIR-PC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check BIR-PC.TO's competition here
KEI.TO vs SRX.TO Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, SRX.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while SRX.TO trades at CA$6.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas SRX.TO's P/E ratio is 92.21. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SRX.TO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is more volatile compared to SRX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check SRX.TO's competition here
KEI.TO vs CNU.TO Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, CNU.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while CNU.TO trades at CA$121.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas CNU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CNU.TO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is more volatile compared to CNU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check CNU.TO's competition here
KEI.TO vs CPI.TO Comparison June 2026
KEI.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KEI.TO stands at 265.3M. In comparison, CPI.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, KEI.TO is priced at CA$7.48, while CPI.TO trades at CA$0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KEI.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 14.38, whereas CPI.TO's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, KEI.TO's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CPI.TO's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KEI.TO is more volatile compared to CPI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KEI.TO.Check CPI.TO's competition here