Athabasca Oil Corporation
Athabasca Oil Corporation (ATH.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (ATH.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATH.TO | CA$12.41 | +1.89% | 6B | 27.58 | CA$0.45 | N/A |
| CNQ.TO | CA$66.08 | +1.19% | 137.8B | 12.08 | CA$5.47 | +3.63% |
| TOU.TO | CA$67.50 | +1.73% | 26.1B | 37.29 | CA$1.81 | +3.86% |
| OVV.TO | CA$82.56 | +3.16% | 23.2B | 19.85 | CA$4.16 | +2.00% |
| WCP.TO | CA$16.74 | +3.40% | 20.3B | 22.93 | CA$0.73 | +4.36% |
| ARX.TO | CA$31.09 | +0.71% | 17.6B | 12.29 | CA$2.53 | +2.57% |
| SCR.TO | CA$48.49 | +6.92% | 10.4B | 41.09 | CA$1.18 | +23.17% |
| PSK.TO | CA$34.87 | +1.99% | 8.1B | 40.55 | CA$0.86 | +2.99% |
| MEG.TO | CA$30.89 | +0.72% | 7.9B | 14.64 | CA$2.11 | +0.68% |
| CPG.TO | CA$11.72 | -0.34% | 7.2B | 23.92 | CA$0.49 | +4.01% |
Stock Comparison
ATH.TO vs CNQ.TO Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, CNQ.TO has a market cap of 137.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while CNQ.TO trades at CA$66.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas CNQ.TO's P/E ratio is 12.08. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CNQ.TO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is more volatile compared to CNQ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check CNQ.TO's competition here
ATH.TO vs TOU.TO Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, TOU.TO has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while TOU.TO trades at CA$67.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas TOU.TO's P/E ratio is 37.29. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TOU.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to TOU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check TOU.TO's competition here
ATH.TO vs OVV.TO Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, OVV.TO has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while OVV.TO trades at CA$82.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas OVV.TO's P/E ratio is 19.85. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OVV.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to OVV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check OVV.TO's competition here
ATH.TO vs WCP.TO Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, WCP.TO has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while WCP.TO trades at CA$16.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas WCP.TO's P/E ratio is 22.93. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WCP.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to WCP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check WCP.TO's competition here
ATH.TO vs ARX.TO Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, ARX.TO has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while ARX.TO trades at CA$31.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas ARX.TO's P/E ratio is 12.29. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ARX.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is more volatile compared to ARX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check ARX.TO's competition here
ATH.TO vs SCR.TO Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, SCR.TO has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while SCR.TO trades at CA$48.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas SCR.TO's P/E ratio is 41.09. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SCR.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to SCR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check SCR.TO's competition here
ATH.TO vs PSK.TO Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, PSK.TO has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while PSK.TO trades at CA$34.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas PSK.TO's P/E ratio is 40.55. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PSK.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to PSK.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check PSK.TO's competition here
ATH.TO vs MEG.TO Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, MEG.TO has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while MEG.TO trades at CA$30.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas MEG.TO's P/E ratio is 14.64. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MEG.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to MEG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check MEG.TO's competition here
ATH.TO vs CPG.TO Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, CPG.TO has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while CPG.TO trades at CA$11.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas CPG.TO's P/E ratio is 23.92. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CPG.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to CPG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check CPG.TO's competition here
ATH.TO vs TVE.TO Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, TVE.TO has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while TVE.TO trades at CA$13.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas TVE.TO's P/E ratio is -74.11. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TVE.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to TVE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check TVE.TO's competition here
ATH.TO vs ERF.TO Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, ERF.TO has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while ERF.TO trades at CA$26.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas ERF.TO's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ERF.TO's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to ERF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check ERF.TO's competition here
ATH.TO vs VRN.TO Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, VRN.TO has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while VRN.TO trades at CA$9.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas VRN.TO's P/E ratio is 19.87. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VRN.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to VRN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check VRN.TO's competition here
ATH.TO vs PEY.TO Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, PEY.TO has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while PEY.TO trades at CA$26.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas PEY.TO's P/E ratio is 11.60. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PEY.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to PEY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check PEY.TO's competition here
ATH.TO vs BTE.TO Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, BTE.TO has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while BTE.TO trades at CA$7.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas BTE.TO's P/E ratio is -15.78. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BTE.TO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to BTE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check BTE.TO's competition here
ATH.TO vs POU.TO Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, POU.TO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while POU.TO trades at CA$32.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas POU.TO's P/E ratio is 80.15. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to POU.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to POU.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check POU.TO's competition here
ATH.TO vs IPCO.TO Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, IPCO.TO has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while IPCO.TO trades at CA$38.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas IPCO.TO's P/E ratio is 129.37. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IPCO.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to IPCO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check IPCO.TO's competition here
ATH.TO vs NVA.TO Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, NVA.TO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while NVA.TO trades at CA$19.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas NVA.TO's P/E ratio is 11.83. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NVA.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to NVA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check NVA.TO's competition here
ATH.TO vs HWX.TO Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, HWX.TO has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while HWX.TO trades at CA$13.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas HWX.TO's P/E ratio is 22.93. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HWX.TO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to HWX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check HWX.TO's competition here
ATH.TO vs FRU.TO Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, FRU.TO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while FRU.TO trades at CA$17.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas FRU.TO's P/E ratio is 32.98. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FRU.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is more volatile compared to FRU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check FRU.TO's competition here
ATH.TO vs SDE.TO Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, SDE.TO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while SDE.TO trades at CA$14.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas SDE.TO's P/E ratio is 45.39. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SDE.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to SDE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check SDE.TO's competition here
ATH.TO vs VET.TO Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, VET.TO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while VET.TO trades at CA$17.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas VET.TO's P/E ratio is -5.31. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VET.TO's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to VET.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check VET.TO's competition here
ATH.TO vs PXT.TO Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, PXT.TO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while PXT.TO trades at CA$27.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas PXT.TO's P/E ratio is 10.72. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PXT.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is more volatile compared to PXT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check PXT.TO's competition here
ATH.TO vs CJ.TO Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, CJ.TO has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while CJ.TO trades at CA$12.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas CJ.TO's P/E ratio is 214.67. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CJ.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to CJ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check CJ.TO's competition here
ATH.TO vs KEL.TO Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, KEL.TO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while KEL.TO trades at CA$10.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas KEL.TO's P/E ratio is 45.45. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KEL.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to KEL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check KEL.TO's competition here
ATH.TO vs TNZ.TO Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, TNZ.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while TNZ.TO trades at CA$58.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas TNZ.TO's P/E ratio is 8.76. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TNZ.TO's ROE of +0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to TNZ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check TNZ.TO's competition here
ATH.TO vs BIR.TO Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, BIR.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while BIR.TO trades at CA$6.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas BIR.TO's P/E ratio is 26.36. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BIR.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to BIR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check BIR.TO's competition here
ATH.TO vs AAV.TO Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, AAV.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while AAV.TO trades at CA$10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas AAV.TO's P/E ratio is 15.46. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AAV.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to AAV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check AAV.TO's competition here
ATH.TO vs MER.TO Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, MER.TO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while MER.TO trades at CA$2.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas MER.TO's P/E ratio is -33.43. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MER.TO's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to MER.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check MER.TO's competition here
ATH.TO vs VLE.TO Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, VLE.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while VLE.TO trades at CA$13.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas VLE.TO's P/E ratio is 46.72. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VLE.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to VLE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check VLE.TO's competition here
ATH.TO vs SOIL.TO Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, SOIL.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while SOIL.TO trades at CA$7.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas SOIL.TO's P/E ratio is 73.00. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SOIL.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to SOIL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check SOIL.TO's competition here
ATH.TO vs AOI.TO Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, AOI.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while AOI.TO trades at CA$1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas AOI.TO's P/E ratio is -2.58. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AOI.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is more volatile compared to AOI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check AOI.TO's competition here
ATH.TO vs OBE.TO Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, OBE.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while OBE.TO trades at CA$18.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas OBE.TO's P/E ratio is 1849.00. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OBE.TO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to OBE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check OBE.TO's competition here
ATH.TO vs CR.TO Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, CR.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while CR.TO trades at CA$7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas CR.TO's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CR.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to CR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check CR.TO's competition here
ATH.TO vs KEC.TO Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, KEC.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while KEC.TO trades at CA$24.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas KEC.TO's P/E ratio is 9.59. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KEC.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is more volatile compared to KEC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check KEC.TO's competition here
ATH.TO vs FEC.TO Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, FEC.TO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while FEC.TO trades at CA$14.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas FEC.TO's P/E ratio is -0.77. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FEC.TO's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is more volatile compared to FEC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check FEC.TO's competition here
ATH.TO vs SGY.TO Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, SGY.TO has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while SGY.TO trades at CA$10.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas SGY.TO's P/E ratio is 145.00. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SGY.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to SGY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check SGY.TO's competition here
ATH.TO vs BIR-PA.TO Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, BIR-PA.TO has a market cap of 726.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while BIR-PA.TO trades at CA$24.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas BIR-PA.TO's P/E ratio is 16.62. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BIR-PA.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is more volatile compared to BIR-PA.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check BIR-PA.TO's competition here
ATH.TO vs GFR.TO Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, GFR.TO has a market cap of 618.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while GFR.TO trades at CA$8.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas GFR.TO's P/E ratio is -57.00. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GFR.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to GFR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check GFR.TO's competition here
ATH.TO vs TAL.TO Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, TAL.TO has a market cap of 543M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while TAL.TO trades at CA$0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas TAL.TO's P/E ratio is 11.80. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TAL.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to TAL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check TAL.TO's competition here
ATH.TO vs PIPE.TO Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, PIPE.TO has a market cap of 542.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while PIPE.TO trades at CA$1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas PIPE.TO's P/E ratio is 3.03. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PIPE.TO's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to PIPE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check PIPE.TO's competition here
ATH.TO vs IPO.TO Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, IPO.TO has a market cap of 494.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while IPO.TO trades at CA$17.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas IPO.TO's P/E ratio is -12.94. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IPO.TO's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to IPO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check IPO.TO's competition here
ATH.TO vs CVVY.TO Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, CVVY.TO has a market cap of 470.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while CVVY.TO trades at CA$1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas CVVY.TO's P/E ratio is -81.00. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CVVY.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to CVVY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check CVVY.TO's competition here
ATH.TO vs GTE.TO Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, GTE.TO has a market cap of 447.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while GTE.TO trades at CA$12.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas GTE.TO's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GTE.TO's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to GTE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check GTE.TO's competition here
ATH.TO vs JOY.TO Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, JOY.TO has a market cap of 440.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while JOY.TO trades at CA$6.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas JOY.TO's P/E ratio is 38.41. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JOY.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to JOY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check JOY.TO's competition here
ATH.TO vs TGL.TO Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, TGL.TO has a market cap of 370.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while TGL.TO trades at CA$5.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas TGL.TO's P/E ratio is 2.18. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TGL.TO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to TGL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check TGL.TO's competition here
ATH.TO vs RBY.TO Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, RBY.TO has a market cap of 330.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while RBY.TO trades at CA$3.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas RBY.TO's P/E ratio is 44.13. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RBY.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to RBY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check RBY.TO's competition here
ATH.TO vs KEI.TO Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, KEI.TO has a market cap of 298M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while KEI.TO trades at CA$8.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas KEI.TO's P/E ratio is 14.24. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KEI.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to KEI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check KEI.TO's competition here
ATH.TO vs ITE.TO Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, ITE.TO has a market cap of 276.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while ITE.TO trades at CA$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas ITE.TO's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ITE.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to ITE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check ITE.TO's competition here
ATH.TO vs PRQ.TO Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, PRQ.TO has a market cap of 268.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while PRQ.TO trades at CA$1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas PRQ.TO's P/E ratio is 22.75. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PRQ.TO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to PRQ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check PRQ.TO's competition here
ATH.TO vs BNE.TO Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, BNE.TO has a market cap of 251.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while BNE.TO trades at CA$6.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas BNE.TO's P/E ratio is -14.85. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BNE.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to BNE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check BNE.TO's competition here
ATH.TO vs PNE.TO Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, PNE.TO has a market cap of 218.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while PNE.TO trades at CA$0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas PNE.TO's P/E ratio is -30.50. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PNE.TO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to PNE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check PNE.TO's competition here
ATH.TO vs CDR.TO Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, CDR.TO has a market cap of 199.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while CDR.TO trades at CA$2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas CDR.TO's P/E ratio is -48.67. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CDR.TO's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to CDR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check CDR.TO's competition here
ATH.TO vs YGR.TO Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, YGR.TO has a market cap of 155.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while YGR.TO trades at CA$1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas YGR.TO's P/E ratio is 11.31. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to YGR.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is more volatile compared to YGR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check YGR.TO's competition here
ATH.TO vs GXE.TO Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, GXE.TO has a market cap of 126.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while GXE.TO trades at CA$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas GXE.TO's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GXE.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to GXE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check GXE.TO's competition here
ATH.TO vs QEC.TO Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, QEC.TO has a market cap of 124.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while QEC.TO trades at CA$0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas QEC.TO's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to QEC.TO's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to QEC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check QEC.TO's competition here
ATH.TO vs PEA.TO Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, PEA.TO has a market cap of 95.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while PEA.TO trades at CA$0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas PEA.TO's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PEA.TO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to PEA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check PEA.TO's competition here
ATH.TO vs FORZ.TO Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, FORZ.TO has a market cap of 90.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while FORZ.TO trades at CA$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas FORZ.TO's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FORZ.TO's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is more volatile compared to FORZ.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check FORZ.TO's competition here
ATH.TO vs CNE.TO Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, CNE.TO has a market cap of 52.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while CNE.TO trades at CA$1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas CNE.TO's P/E ratio is 0.98. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CNE.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is more volatile compared to CNE.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check CNE.TO's competition here
ATH.TO vs TXP.TO Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, TXP.TO has a market cap of 36.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while TXP.TO trades at CA$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas TXP.TO's P/E ratio is 2.80. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TXP.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to TXP.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check TXP.TO's competition here
ATH.TO vs PMT.TO Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, PMT.TO has a market cap of 26.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while PMT.TO trades at CA$0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas PMT.TO's P/E ratio is -2.47. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PMT.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is more volatile compared to PMT.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check PMT.TO's competition here
ATH.TO vs BNG.TO Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, BNG.TO has a market cap of 19.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while BNG.TO trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas BNG.TO's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BNG.TO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is more volatile compared to BNG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check BNG.TO's competition here
ATH.TO vs XOP.CN Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, XOP.CN has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while XOP.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas XOP.CN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to XOP.CN's ROE of -2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. ATH.TO has daily volatility of 1.54 and XOP.CN has daily volatility of N/A.Check XOP.CN's competition here
ATH.TO vs ALTU.V Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, ALTU.V has a market cap of 14.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while ALTU.V trades at CA$0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas ALTU.V's P/E ratio is -1.44. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALTU.V's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to ALTU.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check ALTU.V's competition here
ATH.TO vs SQX.CN Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, SQX.CN has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while SQX.CN trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas SQX.CN's P/E ratio is -3.50. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SQX.CN's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is more volatile compared to SQX.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check SQX.CN's competition here
ATH.TO vs BDR.CN Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, BDR.CN has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while BDR.CN trades at CA$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas BDR.CN's P/E ratio is -2.70. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BDR.CN's ROE of -35.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to BDR.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check BDR.CN's competition here
ATH.TO vs OIL.CN Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, OIL.CN has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while OIL.CN trades at CA$3.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas OIL.CN's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OIL.CN's ROE of -1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to OIL.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check OIL.CN's competition here
ATH.TO vs JBR.CN Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, JBR.CN has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while JBR.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas JBR.CN's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to JBR.CN's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is more volatile compared to JBR.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check JBR.CN's competition here
ATH.TO vs TCF.CN Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, TCF.CN has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while TCF.CN trades at CA$0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas TCF.CN's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TCF.CN's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to TCF.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check TCF.CN's competition here
ATH.TO vs SHP.CN Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, SHP.CN has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while SHP.CN trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas SHP.CN's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SHP.CN's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to SHP.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check SHP.CN's competition here
ATH.TO vs PPR.TO Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, PPR.TO has a market cap of 918.8K. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while PPR.TO trades at CA$0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas PPR.TO's P/E ratio is -1.90. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PPR.TO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to PPR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check PPR.TO's competition here
ATH.TO vs WOGC.CN Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, WOGC.CN has a market cap of 787.3K. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while WOGC.CN trades at CA$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas WOGC.CN's P/E ratio is -1.77. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WOGC.CN's ROE of -2.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to WOGC.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check WOGC.CN's competition here
ATH.TO vs GTOO.CN Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, GTOO.CN has a market cap of 520.9K. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while GTOO.CN trades at CA$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas GTOO.CN's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GTOO.CN's ROE of -2.80%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is more volatile compared to GTOO.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check GTOO.CN's competition here
ATH.TO vs EI.CN Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, EI.CN has a market cap of 466.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while EI.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas EI.CN's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EI.CN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is more volatile compared to EI.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check EI.CN's competition here
ATH.TO vs VIK.CN Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, VIK.CN has a market cap of 143.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while VIK.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas VIK.CN's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VIK.CN's ROE of +0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is more volatile compared to VIK.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check VIK.CN's competition here
ATH.TO vs CNU.TO Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, CNU.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while CNU.TO trades at CA$121.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas CNU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CNU.TO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is more volatile compared to CNU.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check CNU.TO's competition here
ATH.TO vs BIR-PC.TO Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, BIR-PC.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while BIR-PC.TO trades at CA$24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas BIR-PC.TO's P/E ratio is 16.62. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BIR-PC.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is more volatile compared to BIR-PC.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check BIR-PC.TO's competition here
ATH.TO vs CPI.TO Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, CPI.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while CPI.TO trades at CA$0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas CPI.TO's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CPI.TO's ROE of -1.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is more volatile compared to CPI.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check CPI.TO's competition here
ATH.TO vs SRX.TO Comparison May 2026
ATH.TO plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 6B. In comparison, SRX.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$12.41, while SRX.TO trades at CA$6.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 27.58, whereas SRX.TO's P/E ratio is 92.21. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SRX.TO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is more volatile compared to SRX.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check SRX.TO's competition here