Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See ATH.TO's competitors and their performance on the TSX and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for ATH.TO and its TSX peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATH.TO | CA$11.09 | +0.54% | 5.4B | 24.60 | CA$0.45 | N/A |
| CNQ.TO | CA$70.81 | +3.40% | 146.9B | 14.27 | CA$4.94 | +3.44% |
| OVV.TO | CA$92.09 | +0.08% | 25.5B | 13.23 | CA$6.96 | +1.80% |
| TOU.TO | CA$62.28 | +0.16% | 24.2B | 65.52 | CA$0.95 | +4.18% |
| WCP.TO | CA$18.14 | -0.17% | 22B | 15.70 | CA$1.16 | +4.04% |
| ARX.TO | CA$33.85 | -0.29% | 19.2B | 13.38 | CA$2.53 | +2.43% |
| SCR.TO | CA$44.20 | -1.03% | 9.5B | 21.19 | CA$2.09 | +25.43% |
| PSK.TO | CA$36.29 | -0.63% | 8.4B | 35.17 | CA$1.03 | +2.90% |
| MEG.TO | CA$30.89 | +0.72% | 7.9B | 14.64 | CA$2.11 | +0.36% |
| CPG.TO | CA$11.72 | -0.34% | 7.2B | 23.92 | CA$0.49 | +4.01% |
Stock Comparison
Canadian Natural Resources Limited (TSX: CNQ.TO)
ATH.TO vs CNQ.TO Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, CNQ.TO has a market cap of 146.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while CNQ.TO trades at CA$70.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas CNQ.TO's P/E ratio is 14.27. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CNQ.TO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is more volatile compared to CNQ.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check CNQ.TO's competition here
Ovintiv Inc (TSX: OVV.TO)
ATH.TO vs OVV.TO Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, OVV.TO has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while OVV.TO trades at CA$92.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas OVV.TO's P/E ratio is 13.23. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OVV.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to OVV.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check OVV.TO's competition here
Tourmaline Oil Corp. (TSX: TOU.TO)
ATH.TO vs TOU.TO Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, TOU.TO has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while TOU.TO trades at CA$62.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas TOU.TO's P/E ratio is 65.52. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TOU.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to TOU.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check TOU.TO's competition here
Whitecap Resources Inc. (TSX: WCP.TO)
ATH.TO vs WCP.TO Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, WCP.TO has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while WCP.TO trades at CA$18.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas WCP.TO's P/E ratio is 15.70. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WCP.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to WCP.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check WCP.TO's competition here
ARC Resources Ltd. (TSX: ARX.TO)
ATH.TO vs ARX.TO Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, ARX.TO has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while ARX.TO trades at CA$33.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas ARX.TO's P/E ratio is 13.38. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ARX.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is more volatile compared to ARX.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check ARX.TO's competition here
Strathcona Resources Ltd (TSX: SCR.TO)
ATH.TO vs SCR.TO Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, SCR.TO has a market cap of 9.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while SCR.TO trades at CA$44.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas SCR.TO's P/E ratio is 21.19. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SCR.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to SCR.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check SCR.TO's competition here
PrairieSky Royalty Ltd. (TSX: PSK.TO)
ATH.TO vs PSK.TO Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, PSK.TO has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while PSK.TO trades at CA$36.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas PSK.TO's P/E ratio is 35.17. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PSK.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to PSK.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check PSK.TO's competition here
MEG Energy Corp. (TSX: MEG.TO)
ATH.TO vs MEG.TO Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, MEG.TO has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while MEG.TO trades at CA$30.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas MEG.TO's P/E ratio is 14.64. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MEG.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to MEG.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check MEG.TO's competition here
Crescent Point Energy Corp. (TSX: CPG.TO)
ATH.TO vs CPG.TO Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, CPG.TO has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while CPG.TO trades at CA$11.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas CPG.TO's P/E ratio is 23.92. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CPG.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to CPG.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check CPG.TO's competition here
Tamarack Valley Energy Ltd. (TSX: TVE.TO)
ATH.TO vs TVE.TO Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, TVE.TO has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while TVE.TO trades at CA$13.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas TVE.TO's P/E ratio is -441.38. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TVE.TO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to TVE.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check TVE.TO's competition here
Enerplus Corporation (TSX: ERF.TO)
ATH.TO vs ERF.TO Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, ERF.TO has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while ERF.TO trades at CA$26.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas ERF.TO's P/E ratio is 10.93. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ERF.TO's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to ERF.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check ERF.TO's competition here
Veren Inc. (TSX: VRN.TO)
ATH.TO vs VRN.TO Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, VRN.TO has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while VRN.TO trades at CA$9.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas VRN.TO's P/E ratio is 19.87. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VRN.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to VRN.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check VRN.TO's competition here
Peyto Exploration & Development Corp. (TSX: PEY.TO)
ATH.TO vs PEY.TO Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, PEY.TO has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while PEY.TO trades at CA$25.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas PEY.TO's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PEY.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is more volatile compared to PEY.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check PEY.TO's competition here
Paramount Resources Ltd. (TSX: POU.TO)
ATH.TO vs POU.TO Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, POU.TO has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while POU.TO trades at CA$32.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas POU.TO's P/E ratio is 41.93. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to POU.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is more volatile compared to POU.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check POU.TO's competition here
Baytex Energy Corp. (TSX: BTE.TO)
ATH.TO vs BTE.TO Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, BTE.TO has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while BTE.TO trades at CA$6.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas BTE.TO's P/E ratio is -5.66. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BTE.TO's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to BTE.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check BTE.TO's competition here
International Petroleum Corporation (TSX: IPCO.TO)
ATH.TO vs IPCO.TO Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, IPCO.TO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while IPCO.TO trades at CA$35.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas IPCO.TO's P/E ratio is 133.11. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IPCO.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to IPCO.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check IPCO.TO's competition here
NuVista Energy Ltd. (TSX: NVA.TO)
ATH.TO vs NVA.TO Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, NVA.TO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while NVA.TO trades at CA$19.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas NVA.TO's P/E ratio is 11.83. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NVA.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to NVA.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check NVA.TO's competition here
Headwater Exploration Inc. (TSX: HWX.TO)
ATH.TO vs HWX.TO Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, HWX.TO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while HWX.TO trades at CA$14.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas HWX.TO's P/E ratio is 18.32. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HWX.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to HWX.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check HWX.TO's competition here
Freehold Royalties Ltd. (TSX: FRU.TO)
ATH.TO vs FRU.TO Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, FRU.TO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while FRU.TO trades at CA$17.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas FRU.TO's P/E ratio is 20.69. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FRU.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is more volatile compared to FRU.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check FRU.TO's competition here
Spartan Delta Corp (TSX: SDE.TO)
ATH.TO vs SDE.TO Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, SDE.TO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while SDE.TO trades at CA$13.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas SDE.TO's P/E ratio is 40.06. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SDE.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to SDE.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check SDE.TO's competition here
Parex Resources Inc. (TSX: PXT.TO)
ATH.TO vs PXT.TO Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, PXT.TO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while PXT.TO trades at CA$28.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas PXT.TO's P/E ratio is 3.37. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PXT.TO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to PXT.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check PXT.TO's competition here
Vermilion Energy Inc. (TSX: VET.TO)
ATH.TO vs VET.TO Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, VET.TO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while VET.TO trades at CA$17.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas VET.TO's P/E ratio is -5.99. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VET.TO's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to VET.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check VET.TO's competition here
Cardinal Energy Ltd. (TSX: CJ.TO)
ATH.TO vs CJ.TO Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, CJ.TO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while CJ.TO trades at CA$12.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas CJ.TO's P/E ratio is 182.93. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CJ.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to CJ.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check CJ.TO's competition here
Kelt Exploration Ltd. (TSX: KEL.TO)
ATH.TO vs KEL.TO Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, KEL.TO has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while KEL.TO trades at CA$10.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas KEL.TO's P/E ratio is 37.27. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KEL.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to KEL.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check KEL.TO's competition here
Tenaz Energy Corp. (TSX: TNZ.TO)
ATH.TO vs TNZ.TO Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, TNZ.TO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while TNZ.TO trades at CA$61.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas TNZ.TO's P/E ratio is 19.49. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TNZ.TO's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to TNZ.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check TNZ.TO's competition here
Advantage Energy Ltd. (TSX: AAV.TO)
ATH.TO vs AAV.TO Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, AAV.TO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while AAV.TO trades at CA$11.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas AAV.TO's P/E ratio is 23.01. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AAV.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to AAV.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check AAV.TO's competition here
Birchcliff Energy Ltd. (TSX: BIR.TO)
ATH.TO vs BIR.TO Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, BIR.TO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while BIR.TO trades at CA$6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas BIR.TO's P/E ratio is 18.54. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BIR.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to BIR.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check BIR.TO's competition here
Meren Energy Inc. (TSX: MER.TO)
ATH.TO vs MER.TO Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, MER.TO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while MER.TO trades at CA$2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas MER.TO's P/E ratio is -9.34. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MER.TO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to MER.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check MER.TO's competition here
Valeura Energy Inc. (TSX: VLE.TO)
ATH.TO vs VLE.TO Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, VLE.TO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while VLE.TO trades at CA$13.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas VLE.TO's P/E ratio is 16.18. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VLE.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to VLE.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check VLE.TO's competition here
Africa Oil Corp. (TSX: AOI.TO)
ATH.TO vs AOI.TO Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, AOI.TO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while AOI.TO trades at CA$1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas AOI.TO's P/E ratio is -2.58. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AOI.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to AOI.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check AOI.TO's competition here
Crew Energy Inc. (TSX: CR.TO)
ATH.TO vs CR.TO Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, CR.TO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while CR.TO trades at CA$7.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas CR.TO's P/E ratio is 17.21. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CR.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to CR.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check CR.TO's competition here
Saturn Oil & Gas Inc. (TSX: SOIL.TO)
ATH.TO vs SOIL.TO Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, SOIL.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while SOIL.TO trades at CA$6.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas SOIL.TO's P/E ratio is 22.29. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SOIL.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to SOIL.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check SOIL.TO's competition here
Surge Energy Inc. (TSX: SGY.TO)
ATH.TO vs SGY.TO Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, SGY.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while SGY.TO trades at CA$11.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas SGY.TO's P/E ratio is 163.80. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SGY.TO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to SGY.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check SGY.TO's competition here
Obsidian Energy Ltd. (TSX: OBE.TO)
ATH.TO vs OBE.TO Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, OBE.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while OBE.TO trades at CA$16.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas OBE.TO's P/E ratio is -320.86. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OBE.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to OBE.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check OBE.TO's competition here
Kiwetinohk Energy Corp. (TSX: KEC.TO)
ATH.TO vs KEC.TO Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, KEC.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while KEC.TO trades at CA$24.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas KEC.TO's P/E ratio is 9.59. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KEC.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is more volatile compared to KEC.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check KEC.TO's competition here
Birchcliff Energy Ltd. (TSX: BIR-PA.TO)
ATH.TO vs BIR-PA.TO Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, BIR-PA.TO has a market cap of 726.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while BIR-PA.TO trades at CA$24.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas BIR-PA.TO's P/E ratio is 16.62. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BIR-PA.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is more volatile compared to BIR-PA.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check BIR-PA.TO's competition here
Greenfire Resources Ltd. (TSX: GFR.TO)
ATH.TO vs GFR.TO Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, GFR.TO has a market cap of 645.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while GFR.TO trades at CA$8.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas GFR.TO's P/E ratio is -63.71. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GFR.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to GFR.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check GFR.TO's competition here
Frontera Energy Corporation (TSX: FEC.TO)
ATH.TO vs FEC.TO Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, FEC.TO has a market cap of 592.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while FEC.TO trades at CA$8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas FEC.TO's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FEC.TO's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to FEC.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check FEC.TO's competition here
Cavvy Energy Ltd. (TSX: CVVY.TO)
ATH.TO vs CVVY.TO Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, CVVY.TO has a market cap of 578M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while CVVY.TO trades at CA$1.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas CVVY.TO's P/E ratio is -114.72. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CVVY.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to CVVY.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check CVVY.TO's competition here
Pipestone Energy Corp. (TSX: PIPE.TO)
ATH.TO vs PIPE.TO Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, PIPE.TO has a market cap of 542.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while PIPE.TO trades at CA$1.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas PIPE.TO's P/E ratio is 3.03. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PIPE.TO's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to PIPE.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check PIPE.TO's competition here
PetroTal Corp. (TSX: TAL.TO)
ATH.TO vs TAL.TO Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, TAL.TO has a market cap of 506.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while TAL.TO trades at CA$0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas TAL.TO's P/E ratio is 17.70. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TAL.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to TAL.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check TAL.TO's competition here
InPlay Oil Corp (TSX: IPO.TO)
ATH.TO vs IPO.TO Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, IPO.TO has a market cap of 494.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while IPO.TO trades at CA$17.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas IPO.TO's P/E ratio is -12.33. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IPO.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to IPO.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check IPO.TO's competition here
Gran Tierra Energy Inc. (TSX: GTE.TO)
ATH.TO vs GTE.TO Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, GTE.TO has a market cap of 482.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while GTE.TO trades at CA$13.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas GTE.TO's P/E ratio is -1.37. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GTE.TO's ROE of -1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to GTE.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check GTE.TO's competition here
NG Energy International Corp. (TSX: GASX.V)
ATH.TO vs GASX.V Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, GASX.V has a market cap of 466.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while GASX.V trades at CA$1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas GASX.V's P/E ratio is -14.42. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GASX.V's ROE of +0.90%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to GASX.V. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check GASX.V's competition here
Journey Energy Inc. (TSX: JOY.TO)
ATH.TO vs JOY.TO Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, JOY.TO has a market cap of 431.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while JOY.TO trades at CA$6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas JOY.TO's P/E ratio is 17.47. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JOY.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to JOY.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check JOY.TO's competition here
Rubellite Energy Inc. (TSX: RBY.TO)
ATH.TO vs RBY.TO Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, RBY.TO has a market cap of 430.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while RBY.TO trades at CA$4.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas RBY.TO's P/E ratio is 59.42. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RBY.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to RBY.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check RBY.TO's competition here
NG Energy International Corp. (TSX: GASX.TO)
ATH.TO vs GASX.TO Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, GASX.TO has a market cap of 391.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while GASX.TO trades at CA$1.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas GASX.TO's P/E ratio is 8.49. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GASX.TO's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to GASX.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check GASX.TO's competition here
TransGlobe Energy Corporation (TSX: TGL.TO)
ATH.TO vs TGL.TO Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, TGL.TO has a market cap of 370.9M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while TGL.TO trades at CA$5.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas TGL.TO's P/E ratio is 2.18. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TGL.TO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to TGL.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check TGL.TO's competition here
Condor Energies Inc. (TSX: CDR.TO)
ATH.TO vs CDR.TO Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, CDR.TO has a market cap of 302.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while CDR.TO trades at CA$4.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas CDR.TO's P/E ratio is -41.41. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CDR.TO's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to CDR.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check CDR.TO's competition here
Kolibri Global Energy Inc. (TSX: KEI.TO)
ATH.TO vs KEI.TO Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, KEI.TO has a market cap of 299.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while KEI.TO trades at CA$8.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas KEI.TO's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to KEI.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to KEI.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check KEI.TO's competition here
i3 Energy Plc (TSX: ITE.TO)
ATH.TO vs ITE.TO Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, ITE.TO has a market cap of 276.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while ITE.TO trades at CA$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas ITE.TO's P/E ratio is 11.50. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ITE.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to ITE.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check ITE.TO's competition here
Petrus Resources Ltd. (TSX: PRQ.TO)
ATH.TO vs PRQ.TO Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, PRQ.TO has a market cap of 271.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while PRQ.TO trades at CA$1.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas PRQ.TO's P/E ratio is 411.24. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PRQ.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to PRQ.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check PRQ.TO's competition here
Bonterra Energy Corp. (TSX: BNE.TO)
ATH.TO vs BNE.TO Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, BNE.TO has a market cap of 209M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while BNE.TO trades at CA$5.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas BNE.TO's P/E ratio is 15.13. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BNE.TO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to BNE.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check BNE.TO's competition here
Pine Cliff Energy Ltd. (TSX: PNE.TO)
ATH.TO vs PNE.TO Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, PNE.TO has a market cap of 193.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while PNE.TO trades at CA$0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas PNE.TO's P/E ratio is -15.65. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PNE.TO's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to PNE.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check PNE.TO's competition here
Yangarra Resources Ltd. (TSX: YGR.TO)
ATH.TO vs YGR.TO Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, YGR.TO has a market cap of 170M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while YGR.TO trades at CA$1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas YGR.TO's P/E ratio is 8.96. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to YGR.TO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to YGR.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check YGR.TO's competition here
Gear Energy Ltd. (TSX: GXE.TO)
ATH.TO vs GXE.TO Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, GXE.TO has a market cap of 126.5M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while GXE.TO trades at CA$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas GXE.TO's P/E ratio is 12.00. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GXE.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to GXE.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check GXE.TO's competition here
Questerre Energy Corporation (TSX: QEC.TO)
ATH.TO vs QEC.TO Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, QEC.TO has a market cap of 115.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while QEC.TO trades at CA$0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas QEC.TO's P/E ratio is -1.58. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to QEC.TO's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to QEC.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check QEC.TO's competition here
Pieridae Energy Limited (TSX: PEA.TO)
ATH.TO vs PEA.TO Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, PEA.TO has a market cap of 95.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while PEA.TO trades at CA$0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas PEA.TO's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PEA.TO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to PEA.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check PEA.TO's competition here
Forza Petroleum Limited (TSX: FORZ.TO)
ATH.TO vs FORZ.TO Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, FORZ.TO has a market cap of 90.8M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while FORZ.TO trades at CA$0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas FORZ.TO's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FORZ.TO's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is more volatile compared to FORZ.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check FORZ.TO's competition here
Canacol Energy Ltd (TSX: CNE.TO)
ATH.TO vs CNE.TO Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, CNE.TO has a market cap of 52.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while CNE.TO trades at CA$1.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas CNE.TO's P/E ratio is 0.98. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CNE.TO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is more volatile compared to CNE.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check CNE.TO's competition here
Touchstone Exploration Inc. (TSX: TXP.TO)
ATH.TO vs TXP.TO Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, TXP.TO has a market cap of 45.6M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while TXP.TO trades at CA$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas TXP.TO's P/E ratio is 6.90. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TXP.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to TXP.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check TXP.TO's competition here
Perpetual Energy Inc. (TSX: PMT.TO)
ATH.TO vs PMT.TO Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, PMT.TO has a market cap of 26.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while PMT.TO trades at CA$0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas PMT.TO's P/E ratio is -2.47. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PMT.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is more volatile compared to PMT.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check PMT.TO's competition here
Canadian Overseas Petroleum Limited (CNQ: XOP.CN)
ATH.TO vs XOP.CN Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, XOP.CN has a market cap of 18.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while XOP.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas XOP.CN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to XOP.CN's ROE of -2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is not fully comparable compared to XOP.CN. This indicates unavailable risk data in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check XOP.CN's competition here
Bengal Energy Ltd. (TSX: BNG.TO)
ATH.TO vs BNG.TO Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, BNG.TO has a market cap of 9.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while BNG.TO trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas BNG.TO's P/E ratio is -2.78. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BNG.TO's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to BNG.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check BNG.TO's competition here
Bird River Resources Inc. (CNQ: BDR.CN)
ATH.TO vs BDR.CN Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, BDR.CN has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while BDR.CN trades at CA$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas BDR.CN's P/E ratio is -11.90. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BDR.CN's ROE of +25.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to BDR.CN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check BDR.CN's competition here
Squatex Energy and Resources Inc. (CNQ: SQX.CN)
ATH.TO vs SQX.CN Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, SQX.CN has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while SQX.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas SQX.CN's P/E ratio is -20.98. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SQX.CN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is more volatile compared to SQX.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check SQX.CN's competition here
Permex Petroleum Corporation (CNQ: OIL.CN)
ATH.TO vs OIL.CN Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, OIL.CN has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while OIL.CN trades at CA$3.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas OIL.CN's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to OIL.CN's ROE of -0.94%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to OIL.CN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check OIL.CN's competition here
Trillion Energy International Inc. (CNQ: TCF.CN)
ATH.TO vs TCF.CN Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, TCF.CN has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while TCF.CN trades at CA$0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas TCF.CN's P/E ratio is -0.17. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TCF.CN's ROE of +3.77%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to TCF.CN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check TCF.CN's competition here
Shoal Point Energy Ltd. (CNQ: SHP.CN)
ATH.TO vs SHP.CN Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, SHP.CN has a market cap of 1.3M. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while SHP.CN trades at CA$0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas SHP.CN's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SHP.CN's ROE of +1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to SHP.CN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check SHP.CN's competition here
James Bay Resources Limited (CNQ: JBR.CN)
ATH.TO vs JBR.CN Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, JBR.CN has a market cap of 964.5K. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while JBR.CN trades at CA$0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas JBR.CN's P/E ratio is -0.56. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JBR.CN's ROE of +0.64%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is less volatile compared to JBR.CN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check JBR.CN's competition here
Prairie Provident Resources Inc. (TSX: PPR.TO)
ATH.TO vs PPR.TO Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, PPR.TO has a market cap of 552.8K. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while PPR.TO trades at CA$0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas PPR.TO's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PPR.TO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is more volatile compared to PPR.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check PPR.TO's competition here
G2 Energy Corp. (CNQ: GTOO.CN)
ATH.TO vs GTOO.CN Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, GTOO.CN has a market cap of 520.9K. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while GTOO.CN trades at CA$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas GTOO.CN's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GTOO.CN's ROE of -2.80%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is more volatile compared to GTOO.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check GTOO.CN's competition here
Eurogas International Inc. (CNQ: EI.CN)
ATH.TO vs EI.CN Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, EI.CN has a market cap of 466.6K. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while EI.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas EI.CN's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EI.CN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is more volatile compared to EI.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check EI.CN's competition here
Waskahigan Oil & Gas Corp. (CNQ: WOGC.CN)
ATH.TO vs WOGC.CN Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, WOGC.CN has a market cap of 445K. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while WOGC.CN trades at CA$0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas WOGC.CN's P/E ratio is -5.34. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WOGC.CN's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is more volatile compared to WOGC.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check WOGC.CN's competition here
Avila Energy Corporation (CNQ: VIK.CN)
ATH.TO vs VIK.CN Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, VIK.CN has a market cap of 215.4K. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while VIK.CN trades at CA$0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas VIK.CN's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VIK.CN's ROE of +0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is more volatile compared to VIK.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check VIK.CN's competition here
Condor Energies Inc. (TSX: CPI.TO)
ATH.TO vs CPI.TO Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, CPI.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while CPI.TO trades at CA$0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas CPI.TO's P/E ratio is -1.48. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CPI.TO's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is more volatile compared to CPI.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check CPI.TO's competition here
CNOOC Limited (TSX: CNU.TO)
ATH.TO vs CNU.TO Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, CNU.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while CNU.TO trades at CA$121.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas CNU.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CNU.TO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is more volatile compared to CNU.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check CNU.TO's competition here
Storm Resources Ltd. (TSX: SRX.TO)
ATH.TO vs SRX.TO Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, SRX.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while SRX.TO trades at CA$6.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas SRX.TO's P/E ratio is 92.21. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SRX.TO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is more volatile compared to SRX.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check SRX.TO's competition here
Birchcliff Energy Ltd. (TSX: BIR-PC.TO)
ATH.TO vs BIR-PC.TO Comparison August 2026
Athabasca Oil Corporation (TSX: ATH.TO) plays a significant role within the Energy sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, ATH.TO stands at 5.4B. In comparison, BIR-PC.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, ATH.TO is priced at CA$11.09 on the TSX, while BIR-PC.TO trades at CA$24.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
ATH.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 24.60, whereas BIR-PC.TO's P/E ratio is 16.62. In terms of profitability, ATH.TO's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BIR-PC.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ATH.TO is more volatile compared to BIR-PC.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ATH.TO.Check BIR-PC.TO's competition here