Tatva Chintan Pharma Chem Limited

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, ASIANPAINT.BO has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while ASIANPAINT.BO trades at ₹2,428.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas ASIANPAINT.BO's P/E ratio is 60.38. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ASIANPAINT.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is more volatile compared to ASIANPAINT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check ASIANPAINT.BO's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, ASIANPAINT.NS has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while ASIANPAINT.NS trades at ₹2,429.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas ASIANPAINT.NS's P/E ratio is 60.37. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ASIANPAINT.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is more volatile compared to ASIANPAINT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check ASIANPAINT.NS's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, PIDILITIND.NS has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while PIDILITIND.NS trades at ₹1,481.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas PIDILITIND.NS's P/E ratio is 65.31. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PIDILITIND.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is more volatile compared to PIDILITIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check PIDILITIND.NS's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, PIDILITIND.BO has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while PIDILITIND.BO trades at ₹1,481.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas PIDILITIND.BO's P/E ratio is 65.13. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PIDILITIND.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is more volatile compared to PIDILITIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check PIDILITIND.BO's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, SOLARINDS.NS has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while SOLARINDS.NS trades at ₹13,370.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas SOLARINDS.NS's P/E ratio is 82.83. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SOLARINDS.NS's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is less volatile compared to SOLARINDS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check SOLARINDS.NS's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, SOLARINDS.BO has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while SOLARINDS.BO trades at ₹13,367.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas SOLARINDS.BO's P/E ratio is 82.75. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SOLARINDS.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is less volatile compared to SOLARINDS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check SOLARINDS.BO's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, SRF.NS has a market cap of 797.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while SRF.NS trades at ₹2,646.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas SRF.NS's P/E ratio is 44.77. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SRF.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is less volatile compared to SRF.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check SRF.NS's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, SRF.BO has a market cap of 796.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while SRF.BO trades at ₹2,649.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas SRF.BO's P/E ratio is 44.74. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SRF.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is less volatile compared to SRF.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check SRF.BO's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, LINDEINDIA.NS has a market cap of 579.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while LINDEINDIA.NS trades at ₹6,739.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas LINDEINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 98.65. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LINDEINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is more volatile compared to LINDEINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check LINDEINDIA.NS's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, LINDEINDIA.BO has a market cap of 578.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while LINDEINDIA.BO trades at ₹6,734.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas LINDEINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 98.19. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LINDEINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is more volatile compared to LINDEINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check LINDEINDIA.BO's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, BERGEPAINT.NS has a market cap of 531B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while BERGEPAINT.NS trades at ₹464.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas BERGEPAINT.NS's P/E ratio is 50.38. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BERGEPAINT.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is more volatile compared to BERGEPAINT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check BERGEPAINT.NS's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, BERGEPAINT.BO has a market cap of 530.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while BERGEPAINT.BO trades at ₹464.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas BERGEPAINT.BO's P/E ratio is 49.08. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BERGEPAINT.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is more volatile compared to BERGEPAINT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check BERGEPAINT.BO's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, FLUOROCHEM.BO has a market cap of 375.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while FLUOROCHEM.BO trades at ₹3,496.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas FLUOROCHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 57.34. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FLUOROCHEM.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is less volatile compared to FLUOROCHEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check FLUOROCHEM.BO's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, HSCL.BO has a market cap of 247.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while HSCL.BO trades at ₹490.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas HSCL.BO's P/E ratio is 34.58. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HSCL.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is more volatile compared to HSCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check HSCL.BO's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, HSCL.NS has a market cap of 247.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while HSCL.NS trades at ₹490.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas HSCL.NS's P/E ratio is 34.53. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HSCL.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is more volatile compared to HSCL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check HSCL.NS's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, ATUL.BO has a market cap of 193.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while ATUL.BO trades at ₹6,527.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas ATUL.BO's P/E ratio is 32.62. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ATUL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is more volatile compared to ATUL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check ATUL.BO's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, ATUL.NS has a market cap of 193.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while ATUL.NS trades at ₹6,527.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas ATUL.NS's P/E ratio is 32.60. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ATUL.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is more volatile compared to ATUL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check ATUL.NS's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, ACUTAAS.BO has a market cap of 172.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while ACUTAAS.BO trades at ₹2,146.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas ACUTAAS.BO's P/E ratio is 60.47. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ACUTAAS.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is more volatile compared to ACUTAAS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check ACUTAAS.BO's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, ACUTAAS.NS has a market cap of 172.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while ACUTAAS.NS trades at ₹2,146.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas ACUTAAS.NS's P/E ratio is 60.36. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ACUTAAS.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is more volatile compared to ACUTAAS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check ACUTAAS.NS's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, DCMSHRIRAM.BO has a market cap of 170.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while DCMSHRIRAM.BO trades at ₹1,094.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas DCMSHRIRAM.BO's P/E ratio is 26.31. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DCMSHRIRAM.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is more volatile compared to DCMSHRIRAM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check DCMSHRIRAM.BO's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, DCMSHRIRAM.NS has a market cap of 170.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while DCMSHRIRAM.NS trades at ₹1,093.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas DCMSHRIRAM.NS's P/E ratio is 26.28. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DCMSHRIRAM.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is more volatile compared to DCMSHRIRAM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check DCMSHRIRAM.NS's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, AARTIIND.BO has a market cap of 163.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while AARTIIND.BO trades at ₹445.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas AARTIIND.BO's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AARTIIND.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is more volatile compared to AARTIIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check AARTIIND.BO's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, AARTIIND.NS has a market cap of 163.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while AARTIIND.NS trades at ₹446.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas AARTIIND.NS's P/E ratio is 43.33. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AARTIIND.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is more volatile compared to AARTIIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check AARTIIND.NS's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, KANSAINER.BO has a market cap of 160.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while KANSAINER.BO trades at ₹199.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas KANSAINER.BO's P/E ratio is 27.49. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KANSAINER.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is more volatile compared to KANSAINER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check KANSAINER.BO's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, KANSAINER.NS has a market cap of 160.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while KANSAINER.NS trades at ₹199.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas KANSAINER.NS's P/E ratio is 27.41. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KANSAINER.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is more volatile compared to KANSAINER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check KANSAINER.NS's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, VINATIORGA.BO has a market cap of 156.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while VINATIORGA.BO trades at ₹1,512.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas VINATIORGA.BO's P/E ratio is 35.36. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VINATIORGA.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is more volatile compared to VINATIORGA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check VINATIORGA.BO's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, VINATIORGA.NS has a market cap of 156.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while VINATIORGA.NS trades at ₹1,516.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas VINATIORGA.NS's P/E ratio is 35.20. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VINATIORGA.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is more volatile compared to VINATIORGA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check VINATIORGA.NS's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, BASF.NS has a market cap of 154.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while BASF.NS trades at ₹3,571.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas BASF.NS's P/E ratio is 40.92. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BASF.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is more volatile compared to BASF.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check BASF.NS's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, BASF.BO has a market cap of 154.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while BASF.BO trades at ₹3,574.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas BASF.BO's P/E ratio is 41.16. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BASF.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is more volatile compared to BASF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check BASF.BO's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, ANURAS.BO has a market cap of 146.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while ANURAS.BO trades at ₹1,281.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas ANURAS.BO's P/E ratio is 83.80. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ANURAS.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is more volatile compared to ANURAS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check ANURAS.BO's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, ANURAS.NS has a market cap of 145.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while ANURAS.NS trades at ₹1,283.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas ANURAS.NS's P/E ratio is 83.27. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ANURAS.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is more volatile compared to ANURAS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check ANURAS.NS's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, AKZOINDIA.BO has a market cap of 139.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while AKZOINDIA.BO trades at ₹3,090.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas AKZOINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 7.12. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AKZOINDIA.BO's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is more volatile compared to AKZOINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check AKZOINDIA.BO's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, AKZOINDIA.NS has a market cap of 139.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while AKZOINDIA.NS trades at ₹3,086.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas AKZOINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 7.11. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AKZOINDIA.NS's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is more volatile compared to AKZOINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check AKZOINDIA.NS's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, FINEORG.NS has a market cap of 137.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while FINEORG.NS trades at ₹4,647.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas FINEORG.NS's P/E ratio is 34.52. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FINEORG.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is less volatile compared to FINEORG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check FINEORG.NS's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, FINEORG.BO has a market cap of 137B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while FINEORG.BO trades at ₹4,645.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas FINEORG.BO's P/E ratio is 34.53. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FINEORG.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is less volatile compared to FINEORG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check FINEORG.BO's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, AETHER.BO has a market cap of 128.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while AETHER.BO trades at ₹966.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas AETHER.BO's P/E ratio is 59.59. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AETHER.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is more volatile compared to AETHER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check AETHER.BO's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, AETHER.NS has a market cap of 128.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while AETHER.NS trades at ₹968.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas AETHER.NS's P/E ratio is 59.53. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AETHER.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is more volatile compared to AETHER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check AETHER.NS's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, SPLPETRO.BO has a market cap of 124.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while SPLPETRO.BO trades at ₹647.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas SPLPETRO.BO's P/E ratio is 45.58. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SPLPETRO.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is more volatile compared to SPLPETRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check SPLPETRO.BO's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, PCBL.BO has a market cap of 120.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while PCBL.BO trades at ₹304.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas PCBL.BO's P/E ratio is 45.29. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PCBL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is less volatile compared to PCBL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check PCBL.BO's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, PCBL.NS has a market cap of 120.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while PCBL.NS trades at ₹304.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas PCBL.NS's P/E ratio is 45.21. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PCBL.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is less volatile compared to PCBL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check PCBL.NS's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, PRIVISCL.NS has a market cap of 113.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while PRIVISCL.NS trades at ₹2,994.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas PRIVISCL.NS's P/E ratio is 37.75. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PRIVISCL.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is less volatile compared to PRIVISCL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check PRIVISCL.NS's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, PRIVISCL.BO has a market cap of 113.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while PRIVISCL.BO trades at ₹2,992.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas PRIVISCL.BO's P/E ratio is 37.62. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PRIVISCL.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is less volatile compared to PRIVISCL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check PRIVISCL.BO's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, GRWRHITECH.BO has a market cap of 97.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while GRWRHITECH.BO trades at ₹4,041.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas GRWRHITECH.BO's P/E ratio is 31.65. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GRWRHITECH.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is less volatile compared to GRWRHITECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check GRWRHITECH.BO's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, GRWRHITECH.NS has a market cap of 97.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while GRWRHITECH.NS trades at ₹4,046.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas GRWRHITECH.NS's P/E ratio is 31.63. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GRWRHITECH.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is less volatile compared to GRWRHITECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check GRWRHITECH.NS's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, AMIORG.NS has a market cap of 96.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while AMIORG.NS trades at ₹1,176.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas AMIORG.NS's P/E ratio is 119.06. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AMIORG.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is more volatile compared to AMIORG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check AMIORG.NS's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, AMIORG.BO has a market cap of 96.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while AMIORG.BO trades at ₹1,176.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas AMIORG.BO's P/E ratio is 118.95. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AMIORG.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is more volatile compared to AMIORG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check AMIORG.BO's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, JUBLINGREA.BO has a market cap of 95.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while JUBLINGREA.BO trades at ₹608.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas JUBLINGREA.BO's P/E ratio is 36.66. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JUBLINGREA.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is more volatile compared to JUBLINGREA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check JUBLINGREA.BO's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, SHAILY.BO has a market cap of 93.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while SHAILY.BO trades at ₹2,005.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas SHAILY.BO's P/E ratio is 58.93. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SHAILY.BO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is less volatile compared to SHAILY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check SHAILY.BO's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, ALKYLAMINE.BO has a market cap of 77.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while ALKYLAMINE.BO trades at ₹1,512.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas ALKYLAMINE.BO's P/E ratio is 43.07. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ALKYLAMINE.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is more volatile compared to ALKYLAMINE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check ALKYLAMINE.BO's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, ALKYLAMINE.NS has a market cap of 77.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while ALKYLAMINE.NS trades at ₹1,512.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas ALKYLAMINE.NS's P/E ratio is 43.05. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ALKYLAMINE.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is more volatile compared to ALKYLAMINE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check ALKYLAMINE.NS's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, CLEAN.BO has a market cap of 75.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while CLEAN.BO trades at ₹728.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas CLEAN.BO's P/E ratio is 30.80. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CLEAN.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is more volatile compared to CLEAN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check CLEAN.BO's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, CLEAN.NS has a market cap of 75.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while CLEAN.NS trades at ₹728.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas CLEAN.NS's P/E ratio is 30.75. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CLEAN.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is more volatile compared to CLEAN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check CLEAN.NS's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, SUDARSCHEM.NS has a market cap of 70.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while SUDARSCHEM.NS trades at ₹901.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas SUDARSCHEM.NS's P/E ratio is -114.01. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SUDARSCHEM.NS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is more volatile compared to SUDARSCHEM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check SUDARSCHEM.NS's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, SUDARSCHEM.BO has a market cap of 70.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while SUDARSCHEM.BO trades at ₹899.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas SUDARSCHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 133.30. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SUDARSCHEM.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is more volatile compared to SUDARSCHEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check SUDARSCHEM.BO's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, GALAXYSURF.BO has a market cap of 67.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while GALAXYSURF.BO trades at ₹1,949.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas GALAXYSURF.BO's P/E ratio is 23.98. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GALAXYSURF.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is more volatile compared to GALAXYSURF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check GALAXYSURF.BO's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, GALAXYSURF.NS has a market cap of 67.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while GALAXYSURF.NS trades at ₹1,947.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas GALAXYSURF.NS's P/E ratio is 24.02. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GALAXYSURF.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is more volatile compared to GALAXYSURF.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check GALAXYSURF.NS's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, KINGFA.NS has a market cap of 54.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while KINGFA.NS trades at ₹4,027.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas KINGFA.NS's P/E ratio is 31.71. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KINGFA.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is less volatile compared to KINGFA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check KINGFA.NS's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, KINGFA.BO has a market cap of 54.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while KINGFA.BO trades at ₹4,009.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas KINGFA.BO's P/E ratio is 31.70. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KINGFA.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is less volatile compared to KINGFA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check KINGFA.BO's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, GULFOILLUB.BO has a market cap of 53.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while GULFOILLUB.BO trades at ₹1,080.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas GULFOILLUB.BO's P/E ratio is 15.40. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GULFOILLUB.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is more volatile compared to GULFOILLUB.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check GULFOILLUB.BO's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, GULFOILLUB.NS has a market cap of 53.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while GULFOILLUB.NS trades at ₹1,078.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas GULFOILLUB.NS's P/E ratio is 15.39. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GULFOILLUB.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is more volatile compared to GULFOILLUB.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check GULFOILLUB.NS's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, RESPONIND.NS has a market cap of 48.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while RESPONIND.NS trades at ₹180.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas RESPONIND.NS's P/E ratio is 27.02. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RESPONIND.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is less volatile compared to RESPONIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check RESPONIND.NS's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, RESPONIND.BO has a market cap of 48.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while RESPONIND.BO trades at ₹181.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas RESPONIND.BO's P/E ratio is 26.96. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RESPONIND.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is more volatile compared to RESPONIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check RESPONIND.BO's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, INDIGOPNTS.BO has a market cap of 45.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while INDIGOPNTS.BO trades at ₹951.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas INDIGOPNTS.BO's P/E ratio is 31.33. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to INDIGOPNTS.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is more volatile compared to INDIGOPNTS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check INDIGOPNTS.BO's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, INDIGOPNTS.NS has a market cap of 45B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while INDIGOPNTS.NS trades at ₹950.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas INDIGOPNTS.NS's P/E ratio is 31.24. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to INDIGOPNTS.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is more volatile compared to INDIGOPNTS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check INDIGOPNTS.NS's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, TANFACIND.BO has a market cap of 42.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while TANFACIND.BO trades at ₹4,276.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas TANFACIND.BO's P/E ratio is 57.19. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TANFACIND.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is more volatile compared to TANFACIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check TANFACIND.BO's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, LXCHEM.BO has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while LXCHEM.BO trades at ₹135.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas LXCHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 47.86. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LXCHEM.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is more volatile compared to LXCHEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check LXCHEM.BO's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, LXCHEM.NS has a market cap of 38B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while LXCHEM.NS trades at ₹135.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas LXCHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 47.83. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to LXCHEM.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is more volatile compared to LXCHEM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check LXCHEM.NS's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, POCL.NS has a market cap of 35.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while POCL.NS trades at ₹1,147.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas POCL.NS's P/E ratio is 31.44. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to POCL.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is less volatile compared to POCL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check POCL.NS's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, POCL.BO has a market cap of 35.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while POCL.BO trades at ₹1,145.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas POCL.BO's P/E ratio is 31.21. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to POCL.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is less volatile compared to POCL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check POCL.BO's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, BALAMINES.BO has a market cap of 35.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while BALAMINES.BO trades at ₹1,076.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas BALAMINES.BO's P/E ratio is 24.51. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BALAMINES.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is more volatile compared to BALAMINES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check BALAMINES.BO's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, BALAMINES.NS has a market cap of 35.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while BALAMINES.NS trades at ₹1,074.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas BALAMINES.NS's P/E ratio is 24.47. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BALAMINES.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is more volatile compared to BALAMINES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check BALAMINES.NS's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, ADVENZYMES.NS has a market cap of 35B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while ADVENZYMES.NS trades at ₹313.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas ADVENZYMES.NS's P/E ratio is 22.73. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ADVENZYMES.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is less volatile compared to ADVENZYMES.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check ADVENZYMES.NS's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, NEOGEN.BO has a market cap of 35B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while NEOGEN.BO trades at ₹1,393.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas NEOGEN.BO's P/E ratio is 178.89. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NEOGEN.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is less volatile compared to NEOGEN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check NEOGEN.BO's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, NEOGEN.NS has a market cap of 35B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while NEOGEN.NS trades at ₹1,386.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas NEOGEN.NS's P/E ratio is 178.56. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NEOGEN.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is less volatile compared to NEOGEN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check NEOGEN.NS's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, ADVENZYMES.BO has a market cap of 34.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while ADVENZYMES.BO trades at ₹313.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas ADVENZYMES.BO's P/E ratio is 22.99. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ADVENZYMES.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is less volatile compared to ADVENZYMES.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check ADVENZYMES.BO's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, VISHNU.NS has a market cap of 34.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while VISHNU.NS trades at ₹516.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas VISHNU.NS's P/E ratio is 24.92. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VISHNU.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is more volatile compared to VISHNU.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check VISHNU.NS's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, VISHNU.BO has a market cap of 34.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while VISHNU.BO trades at ₹516.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas VISHNU.BO's P/E ratio is 24.91. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VISHNU.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is more volatile compared to VISHNU.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check VISHNU.BO's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, GRAUWEIL.BO has a market cap of 31.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while GRAUWEIL.BO trades at ₹67.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas GRAUWEIL.BO's P/E ratio is 22.24. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GRAUWEIL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is less volatile compared to GRAUWEIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check GRAUWEIL.BO's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, GRAUWEIL.NS has a market cap of 29.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while GRAUWEIL.NS trades at ₹117.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas GRAUWEIL.NS's P/E ratio is 20.50. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GRAUWEIL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is less volatile compared to GRAUWEIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check GRAUWEIL.NS's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, DDEVPLSTIK.BO has a market cap of 29.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while DDEVPLSTIK.BO trades at ₹280.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas DDEVPLSTIK.BO's P/E ratio is 14.61. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DDEVPLSTIK.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is more volatile compared to DDEVPLSTIK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check DDEVPLSTIK.BO's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, DDEVPLSTIK.NS has a market cap of 29.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while DDEVPLSTIK.NS trades at ₹278.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas DDEVPLSTIK.NS's P/E ratio is 14.60. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DDEVPLSTIK.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is more volatile compared to DDEVPLSTIK.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check DDEVPLSTIK.NS's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, PRINCEPIPE.NS has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while PRINCEPIPE.NS trades at ₹259.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas PRINCEPIPE.NS's P/E ratio is 66.24. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PRINCEPIPE.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is more volatile compared to PRINCEPIPE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check PRINCEPIPE.NS's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, ROSSARI.BO has a market cap of 28.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while ROSSARI.BO trades at ₹508.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas ROSSARI.BO's P/E ratio is 20.54. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ROSSARI.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is more volatile compared to ROSSARI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check ROSSARI.BO's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, ROSSARI.NS has a market cap of 28.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while ROSSARI.NS trades at ₹508.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas ROSSARI.NS's P/E ratio is 20.53. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ROSSARI.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is more volatile compared to ROSSARI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check ROSSARI.NS's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, JUBLCPL.BO has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while JUBLCPL.BO trades at ₹1,870.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas JUBLCPL.BO's P/E ratio is 23.21. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JUBLCPL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is more volatile compared to JUBLCPL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check JUBLCPL.BO's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, JUBLCPL.NS has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while JUBLCPL.NS trades at ₹1,848.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas JUBLCPL.NS's P/E ratio is 23.13. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JUBLCPL.NS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is more volatile compared to JUBLCPL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check JUBLCPL.NS's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, TATVA.NS has a market cap of 27.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while TATVA.NS trades at ₹1,222.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas TATVA.NS's P/E ratio is 85.07. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TATVA.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is less volatile compared to TATVA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check TATVA.NS's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, KIRIINDUS.BO has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while KIRIINDUS.BO trades at ₹456.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas KIRIINDUS.BO's P/E ratio is 0.56. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KIRIINDUS.BO's ROE of +1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is more volatile compared to KIRIINDUS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check KIRIINDUS.BO's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, CAMLINFINE.BO has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while CAMLINFINE.BO trades at ₹142.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas CAMLINFINE.BO's P/E ratio is 18.37. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CAMLINFINE.BO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is less volatile compared to CAMLINFINE.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check CAMLINFINE.BO's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, KIRIINDUS.NS has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while KIRIINDUS.NS trades at ₹455.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas KIRIINDUS.NS's P/E ratio is 0.56. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KIRIINDUS.NS's ROE of +1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is more volatile compared to KIRIINDUS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check KIRIINDUS.NS's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, CAMLINFINE.NS has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while CAMLINFINE.NS trades at ₹142.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas CAMLINFINE.NS's P/E ratio is 18.33. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to CAMLINFINE.NS's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is less volatile compared to CAMLINFINE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check CAMLINFINE.NS's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, SIRCA.BO has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while SIRCA.BO trades at ₹468.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas SIRCA.BO's P/E ratio is 41.54. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SIRCA.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is more volatile compared to SIRCA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check SIRCA.BO's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, SIRCA.NS has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while SIRCA.NS trades at ₹467.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas SIRCA.NS's P/E ratio is 41.56. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SIRCA.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is more volatile compared to SIRCA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check SIRCA.NS's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, FISCHER.BO has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while FISCHER.BO trades at ₹40.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas FISCHER.BO's P/E ratio is 67.49. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to FISCHER.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is less volatile compared to FISCHER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check FISCHER.BO's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, POLYPLEX.NS has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while POLYPLEX.NS trades at ₹814.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas POLYPLEX.NS's P/E ratio is 35.08. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to POLYPLEX.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is more volatile compared to POLYPLEX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check POLYPLEX.NS's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, POLYPLEX.BO has a market cap of 25.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while POLYPLEX.BO trades at ₹812.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas POLYPLEX.BO's P/E ratio is 35.05. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to POLYPLEX.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is more volatile compared to POLYPLEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check POLYPLEX.BO's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, JUBLINDS.NS has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while JUBLINDS.NS trades at ₹1,633.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas JUBLINDS.NS's P/E ratio is 72.49. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JUBLINDS.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is less volatile compared to JUBLINDS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check JUBLINDS.NS's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, JUBLINDS.BO has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while JUBLINDS.BO trades at ₹1,623.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas JUBLINDS.BO's P/E ratio is 72.31. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JUBLINDS.BO's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is less volatile compared to JUBLINDS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check JUBLINDS.BO's competition here

TATVA.BO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATVA.BO stands at 28B. In comparison, PREMEXPLN.NS has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TATVA.BO is priced at ₹1,224.85, while PREMEXPLN.NS trades at ₹470.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATVA.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 85.12, whereas PREMEXPLN.NS's P/E ratio is 58.74. In terms of profitability, TATVA.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PREMEXPLN.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TATVA.BO is more volatile compared to PREMEXPLN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATVA.BO.Check PREMEXPLN.NS's competition here