TAT Technologies Ltd.

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, GE has a market cap of 357.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while GE trades at $338.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas GE's P/E ratio is 42.22. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GE's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is more volatile compared to GE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check GE's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, RTX has a market cap of 271.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while RTX trades at $201.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas RTX's P/E ratio is 40.81. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RTX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is more volatile compared to RTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check RTX's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, BA has a market cap of 181B. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while BA trades at $230.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas BA's P/E ratio is 92.91. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BA's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to BA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check BA's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, LMT has a market cap of 153B. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while LMT trades at $660.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas LMT's P/E ratio is 30.81. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LMT's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is more volatile compared to LMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check LMT's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, NOC has a market cap of 102.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while NOC trades at $725.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas NOC's P/E ratio is 24.92. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NOC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is more volatile compared to NOC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check NOC's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, GD has a market cap of 94.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while GD trades at $348.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas GD's P/E ratio is 22.57. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is more volatile compared to GD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check GD's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, TDG has a market cap of 73.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while TDG trades at $1,296.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas TDG's P/E ratio is 41.69. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TDG's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to TDG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check TDG's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, LHX has a market cap of 66.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while LHX trades at $355.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas LHX's P/E ratio is 41.59. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LHX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is more volatile compared to LHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check LHX's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, HEI has a market cap of 48.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while HEI trades at $346.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas HEI's P/E ratio is 70.53. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HEI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to HEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check HEI's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, ERJ has a market cap of 47.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while ERJ trades at $64.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas ERJ's P/E ratio is 37.73. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ERJ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to ERJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check ERJ's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, HEI-A has a market cap of 40.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while HEI-A trades at $258.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas HEI-A's P/E ratio is 52.95. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HEI-A's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is more volatile compared to HEI-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check HEI-A's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, RKLB has a market cap of 37.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while RKLB trades at $70.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas RKLB's P/E ratio is -184.76. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RKLB's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to RKLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check RKLB's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, ESLT has a market cap of 34.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while ESLT trades at $745.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas ESLT's P/E ratio is 75.62. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ESLT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to ESLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check ESLT's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, AXON has a market cap of 33.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while AXON trades at $423.44.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas AXON's P/E ratio is 133.58. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AXON's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to AXON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check AXON's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, CW has a market cap of 25.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while CW trades at $699.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas CW's P/E ratio is 54.33. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CW's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to CW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check CW's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, WWD has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while WWD trades at $392.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas WWD's P/E ratio is 49.34. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WWD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is more volatile compared to WWD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check WWD's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, BWXT has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while BWXT trades at $198.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas BWXT's P/E ratio is 59.41. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BWXT's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to BWXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check BWXT's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, TXT has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while TXT trades at $98.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas TXT's P/E ratio is 19.30. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TXT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to TXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check TXT's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, HII has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while HII trades at $438.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas HII's P/E ratio is 28.46. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HII's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to HII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check HII's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, KTOS has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while KTOS trades at $94.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas KTOS's P/E ratio is 725.46. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KTOS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to KTOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check KTOS's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, EMBJ has a market cap of 13.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while EMBJ trades at $72.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas EMBJ's P/E ratio is 42.17. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EMBJ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to EMBJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check EMBJ's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, AVAV has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while AVAV trades at $261.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas AVAV's P/E ratio is -214.20. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AVAV's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to AVAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check AVAV's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, MOG-A has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while MOG-A trades at $344.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas MOG-A's P/E ratio is 43.00. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MOG-A's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is more volatile compared to MOG-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check MOG-A's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, MOG-B has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while MOG-B trades at $344.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas MOG-B's P/E ratio is 43.05. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MOG-B's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is more volatile compared to MOG-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check MOG-B's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, KRMN has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while KRMN trades at $81.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas KRMN's P/E ratio is 1016.25. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KRMN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to KRMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check KRMN's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, SARO has a market cap of 10.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while SARO trades at $31.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas SARO's P/E ratio is 56.09. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SARO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to SARO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check SARO's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, DRS has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while DRS trades at $38.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas DRS's P/E ratio is 38.53. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DRS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to DRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check DRS's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, CAE has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while CAE trades at $29.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas CAE's P/E ratio is 33.33. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CAE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to CAE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check CAE's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, PL has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while PL trades at $23.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas PL's P/E ratio is -55.28. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PL's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check PL's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, HXL has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while HXL trades at $90.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas HXL's P/E ratio is 66.39. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HXL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to HXL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check HXL's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, AMTM has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while AMTM trades at $29.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas AMTM's P/E ratio is 73.88. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AMTM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to AMTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check AMTM's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, LOAR has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while LOAR trades at $65.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas LOAR's P/E ratio is 98.71. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LOAR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to LOAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check LOAR's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, MRCY has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while MRCY trades at $85.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas MRCY's P/E ratio is -165.19. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MRCY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to MRCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check MRCY's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, ACHR has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while ACHR trades at $6.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas ACHR's P/E ratio is -5.95. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ACHR's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to ACHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check ACHR's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, RAL has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while RAL trades at $42.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas RAL's P/E ratio is -3.88. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RAL's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to RAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check RAL's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, AJRD has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while AJRD trades at $57.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas AJRD's P/E ratio is 63.03. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AJRD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is more volatile compared to AJRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check AJRD's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, SPR has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while SPR trades at $39.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas SPR's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SPR's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to SPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check SPR's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, AIR has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while AIR trades at $116.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas AIR's P/E ratio is 45.54. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AIR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to AIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check AIR's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, VSEC has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while VSEC trades at $222.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas VSEC's P/E ratio is 73.85. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VSEC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to VSEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check VSEC's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, BETA has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while BETA trades at $18.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas BETA's P/E ratio is -4.66. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BETA's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to BETA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check BETA's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, PL-WT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while PL-WT trades at $12.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas PL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PL-WT's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to PL-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check PL-WT's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, LUNR has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while LUNR trades at $18.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas LUNR's P/E ratio is -7.37. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LUNR's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to LUNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check LUNR's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, FLY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while FLY trades at $19.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas FLY's P/E ratio is -7.48. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FLY's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to FLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check FLY's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, POWWP has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while POWWP trades at $24.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas POWWP's P/E ratio is 84.74. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to POWWP's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is more volatile compared to POWWP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check POWWP's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, ATRO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while ATRO trades at $76.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas ATRO's P/E ratio is -847.78. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ATRO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to ATRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check ATRO's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, VVX has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while VVX trades at $67.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas VVX's P/E ratio is 27.05. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VVX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to VVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check VVX's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, TGI has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while TGI trades at $26.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas TGI's P/E ratio is 56.54. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TGI's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is more volatile compared to TGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check TGI's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, DCO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while DCO trades at $124.73.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas DCO's P/E ratio is -53.71. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DCO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to DCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check DCO's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, ACHR-WT has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while ACHR-WT trades at -$9.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas ACHR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ACHR-WT's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is more volatile compared to ACHR-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check ACHR-WT's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, CDRE has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while CDRE trades at $42.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas CDRE's P/E ratio is 38.10. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CDRE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to CDRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check CDRE's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, VOYG has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while VOYG trades at $26.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas VOYG's P/E ratio is -14.99. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VOYG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to VOYG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check VOYG's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, RDW has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while RDW trades at $8.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas RDW's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RDW's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to RDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check RDW's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, KAMN has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while KAMN trades at $45.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas KAMN's P/E ratio is 164.25. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KAMN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is more volatile compared to KAMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check KAMN's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, EVEX-WT has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while EVEX-WT trades at $0.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas EVEX-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EVEX-WT's ROE of -2.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to EVEX-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check EVEX-WT's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, VEC has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while VEC trades at $32.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas VEC's P/E ratio is 11.09. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VEC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is more volatile compared to VEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check VEC's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, NPK has a market cap of 912M. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while NPK trades at $127.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas NPK's P/E ratio is 23.44. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NPK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to NPK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check NPK's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, EVEX has a market cap of 889.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while EVEX trades at $2.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas EVEX's P/E ratio is -4.48. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EVEX's ROE of -2.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to EVEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check EVEX's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, SKYH has a market cap of 667.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while SKYH trades at $8.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas SKYH's P/E ratio is -19.07. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SKYH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to SKYH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check SKYH's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, RGR has a market cap of 596.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while RGR trades at $37.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas RGR's P/E ratio is 267.36. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RGR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to RGR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check RGR's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, SWBI has a market cap of 517.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while SWBI trades at $11.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas SWBI's P/E ratio is 55.43. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SWBI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to SWBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check SWBI's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, PKE has a market cap of 512.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while PKE trades at $25.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas PKE's P/E ratio is 59.84. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PKE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to PKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check PKE's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, EH has a market cap of 443M. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while EH trades at $12.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas EH's P/E ratio is -21.49. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EH's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to EH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check EH's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, ISSC has a market cap of 418.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while ISSC trades at $23.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas ISSC's P/E ratio is 22.23. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ISSC's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to ISSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check ISSC's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, EVTL has a market cap of 405.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while EVTL trades at $4.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas EVTL's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EVTL's ROE of +17.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to EVTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check EVTL's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, AIRO has a market cap of 302.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while AIRO trades at $9.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas AIRO's P/E ratio is -64.33. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AIRO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to AIRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check AIRO's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, BYRN has a market cap of 268.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while BYRN trades at $11.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas BYRN's P/E ratio is 29.60. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BYRN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to BYRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check BYRN's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, POWW has a market cap of 252.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while POWW trades at $2.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas POWW's P/E ratio is -7.68. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to POWW's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to POWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check POWW's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, DPRO has a market cap of 202.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while DPRO trades at $7.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas DPRO's P/E ratio is -4.72. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DPRO's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to DPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check DPRO's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, CODA has a market cap of 155.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while CODA trades at $13.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas CODA's P/E ratio is 37.38. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CODA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to CODA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check CODA's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, SPCE has a market cap of 153.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while SPCE trades at $2.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas SPCE's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SPCE's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to SPCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check SPCE's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, VWAV has a market cap of 130M. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while VWAV trades at $7.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas VWAV's P/E ratio is -16.52. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VWAV's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to VWAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check VWAV's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, IVAC has a market cap of 108.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while IVAC trades at $4.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas IVAC's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IVAC's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is more volatile compared to IVAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check IVAC's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, FJET has a market cap of 90.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while FJET trades at $8.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas FJET's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FJET's ROE of +2.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to FJET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check FJET's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, PEW has a market cap of 82.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while PEW trades at $2.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas PEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PEW's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to PEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check PEW's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, SIF has a market cap of 82.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while SIF trades at $13.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas SIF's P/E ratio is 24.54. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SIF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to SIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check SIF's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, HOVR has a market cap of 82.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while HOVR trades at $1.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas HOVR's P/E ratio is -2.35. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HOVR's ROE of -3.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to HOVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check HOVR's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, OPXS has a market cap of 74.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while OPXS trades at $10.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas OPXS's P/E ratio is 16.45. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OPXS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to OPXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check OPXS's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, SIDU has a market cap of 71.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while SIDU trades at $2.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas SIDU's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SIDU's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to SIDU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check SIDU's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, SPAI has a market cap of 60.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while SPAI trades at $3.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas SPAI's P/E ratio is -5.28. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SPAI's ROE of -2.80%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to SPAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check SPAI's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, LLAP has a market cap of 51.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while LLAP trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas LLAP's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LLAP's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is more volatile compared to LLAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check LLAP's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, CVU has a market cap of 51.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while CVU trades at $3.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas CVU's P/E ratio is -78.48. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CVU's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to CVU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check CVU's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, LLAP-WT has a market cap of 50M. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while LLAP-WT trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas LLAP-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LLAP-WT's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to LLAP-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check LLAP-WT's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, VTSI has a market cap of 46M. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while VTSI trades at $4.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas VTSI's P/E ratio is 40.70. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VTSI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to VTSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check VTSI's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, LILM has a market cap of 37.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while LILM trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas LILM's P/E ratio is 0.74. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LILM's ROE of -3.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to LILM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check LILM's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, KITTW has a market cap of 35.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while KITTW trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas KITTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KITTW's ROE of +19.56%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to KITTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check KITTW's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, XTIA has a market cap of 28.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while XTIA trades at $1.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas XTIA's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to XTIA's ROE of -5.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to XTIA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check XTIA's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, PRZO has a market cap of 24.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while PRZO trades at $1.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas PRZO's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PRZO's ROE of -5.75%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to PRZO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check PRZO's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, SKYH-WT has a market cap of 20.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while SKYH-WT trades at $0.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas SKYH-WT's P/E ratio is -2.05. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SKYH-WT's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to SKYH-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check SKYH-WT's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, GPUS has a market cap of 19.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while GPUS trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas GPUS's P/E ratio is 0.11. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GPUS's ROE of -1.92%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to GPUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check GPUS's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, HOVRW has a market cap of 16.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while HOVRW trades at $0.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas HOVRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HOVRW's ROE of -3.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to HOVRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check HOVRW's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, AIRI has a market cap of 12.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while AIRI trades at $3.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas AIRI's P/E ratio is -6.08. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AIRI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to AIRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check AIRI's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, ASTR has a market cap of 12.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while ASTR trades at $0.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas ASTR's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ASTR's ROE of -51.92%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to ASTR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check ASTR's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, AULT has a market cap of 8.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while AULT trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas AULT's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AULT's ROE of -1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to AULT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check AULT's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, KWESW has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while KWESW trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas KWESW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KWESW's ROE of -2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to KWESW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check KWESW's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, KWE has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while KWE trades at $10.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas KWE's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KWE's ROE of -2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to KWE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check KWE's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, ASTC has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while ASTC trades at $2.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas ASTC's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ASTC's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to ASTC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check ASTC's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, KITT has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while KITT trades at $0.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas KITT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KITT's ROE of +19.56%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to KITT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check KITT's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, LILMW has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while LILMW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas LILMW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LILMW's ROE of -3.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is more volatile compared to LILMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check LILMW's competition here

TATT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, TATT stands at 696.9M. In comparison, MNTS has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TATT is priced at $53.81, while MNTS trades at $4.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

TATT currently has a P/E ratio of 40.46, whereas MNTS's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, TATT's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MNTS's ROE of +5.82%. Regarding short-term risk, TATT is less volatile compared to MNTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TATT.Check MNTS's competition here