Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LMT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Aerospace & Defense Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMT | $520.15 | -1.48% | 119.5B | 19.57 | $26.48 | +2.61% |
| SPCX | $139.24 | -8.49% | 1.9T | -114.52 | -$1.27 | N/A |
| GE | $355.74 | -0.92% | 375.5B | 53.24 | $6.75 | +0.46% |
| RTX | $196.36 | +0.60% | 263.9B | 29.73 | $6.59 | +1.41% |
| BA | $218.17 | -2.21% | 175.2B | 220.08 | $1.01 | N/A |
| HWM | $273.12 | -0.24% | 108.4B | 71.84 | $3.77 | +0.18% |
| GD | $375.32 | +0.19% | 101.4B | 23.59 | $15.89 | +1.65% |
| NOC | $539.88 | +1.44% | 76.7B | 19.17 | $28.15 | +1.75% |
| TDG | $1,235.12 | -4.68% | 72.3B | 33.56 | $38.50 | +6.94% |
| HONAV | $221.01 | -7.02% | 70B | 46.33 | $4.77 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LMT vs SPCX Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, SPCX has a market cap of 1.9T. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while SPCX trades at $139.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas SPCX's P/E ratio is -114.52. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to SPCX's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to SPCX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check SPCX's competition here
LMT vs GE Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, GE has a market cap of 375.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while GE trades at $355.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas GE's P/E ratio is 53.24. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to GE's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is more volatile compared to GE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check GE's competition here
LMT vs RTX Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, RTX has a market cap of 263.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while RTX trades at $196.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas RTX's P/E ratio is 29.73. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to RTX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is more volatile compared to RTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check RTX's competition here
LMT vs BA Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, BA has a market cap of 175.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while BA trades at $218.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas BA's P/E ratio is 220.08. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to BA's ROE of -87.23%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to BA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check BA's competition here
LMT vs HWM Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, HWM has a market cap of 108.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while HWM trades at $273.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas HWM's P/E ratio is 71.84. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to HWM's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to HWM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check HWM's competition here
LMT vs GD Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, GD has a market cap of 101.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while GD trades at $375.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas GD's P/E ratio is 23.59. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to GD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is more volatile compared to GD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check GD's competition here
LMT vs NOC Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, NOC has a market cap of 76.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while NOC trades at $539.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas NOC's P/E ratio is 19.17. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to NOC's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is more volatile compared to NOC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check NOC's competition here
LMT vs TDG Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, TDG has a market cap of 72.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while TDG trades at $1,235.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas TDG's P/E ratio is 33.56. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to TDG's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to TDG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check TDG's competition here
LMT vs HONAV Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, HONAV has a market cap of 70B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while HONAV trades at $221.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas HONAV's P/E ratio is 46.33. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to HONAV's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to HONAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check HONAV's competition here
LMT vs HONA Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, HONA has a market cap of 70B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while HONA trades at $216.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas HONA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to HONA's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to HONA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check HONA's competition here
LMT vs LHX Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, LHX has a market cap of 54B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while LHX trades at $290.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas LHX's P/E ratio is 26.21. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to LHX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is more volatile compared to LHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check LHX's competition here
LMT vs HEI-A Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, HEI-A has a market cap of 48.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while HEI-A trades at $250.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas HEI-A's P/E ratio is 47.05. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to HEI-A's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to HEI-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check HEI-A's competition here
LMT vs HEI Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, HEI has a market cap of 48.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while HEI trades at $346.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas HEI's P/E ratio is 62.68. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to HEI's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to HEI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check HEI's competition here
LMT vs ERJ Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, ERJ has a market cap of 47.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while ERJ trades at $64.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas ERJ's P/E ratio is 37.73. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to ERJ's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to ERJ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check ERJ's competition here
LMT vs RKLB Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, RKLB has a market cap of 46.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while RKLB trades at $78.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas RKLB's P/E ratio is -405.20. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to RKLB's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to RKLB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check RKLB's competition here
LMT vs AXON Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, AXON has a market cap of 45.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while AXON trades at $562.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas AXON's P/E ratio is 80.26. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to AXON's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to AXON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check AXON's competition here
LMT vs HWM-P Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, HWM-P has a market cap of 40.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while HWM-P trades at $100.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas HWM-P's P/E ratio is 140.74. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to HWM-P's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is more volatile compared to HWM-P. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check HWM-P's competition here
LMT vs ESLT Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, ESLT has a market cap of 35.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while ESLT trades at $731.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas ESLT's P/E ratio is 53.66. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to ESLT's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to ESLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check ESLT's competition here
LMT vs CW Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, CW has a market cap of 27.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while CW trades at $745.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas CW's P/E ratio is 54.29. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to CW's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to CW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check CW's competition here
LMT vs WWD Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, WWD has a market cap of 24.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while WWD trades at $396.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas WWD's P/E ratio is 49.02. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to WWD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to WWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check WWD's competition here
LMT vs BWXT Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, BWXT has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while BWXT trades at $182.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas BWXT's P/E ratio is 44.09. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to BWXT's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to BWXT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check BWXT's competition here
LMT vs TXT Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, TXT has a market cap of 15.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while TXT trades at $90.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas TXT's P/E ratio is 14.47. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to TXT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is more volatile compared to TXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check TXT's competition here
LMT vs MOG-B Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, MOG-B has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while MOG-B trades at $411.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas MOG-B's P/E ratio is 40.31. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to MOG-B's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is more volatile compared to MOG-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check MOG-B's competition here
LMT vs MOG-A Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, MOG-A has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while MOG-A trades at $400.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas MOG-A's P/E ratio is 41.96. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to MOG-A's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to MOG-A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check MOG-A's competition here
LMT vs EMBJ Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, EMBJ has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while EMBJ trades at $65.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas EMBJ's P/E ratio is 41.03. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to EMBJ's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is more volatile compared to EMBJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check EMBJ's competition here
LMT vs DRS Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, DRS has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while DRS trades at $43.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas DRS's P/E ratio is 36.79. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to DRS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to DRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check DRS's competition here
LMT vs HII Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, HII has a market cap of 11.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while HII trades at $286.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas HII's P/E ratio is 18.60. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to HII's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is more volatile compared to HII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check HII's competition here
LMT vs SARO Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, SARO has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while SARO trades at $27.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas SARO's P/E ratio is 31.74. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to SARO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to SARO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check SARO's competition here
LMT vs KTOS Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, KTOS has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while KTOS trades at $47.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas KTOS's P/E ratio is 81.68. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to KTOS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to KTOS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check KTOS's competition here
LMT vs PL Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, PL has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while PL trades at $26.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas PL's P/E ratio is -35.68. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to PL's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check PL's competition here
LMT vs CAE Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, CAE has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while CAE trades at $25.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas CAE's P/E ratio is 29.47. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to CAE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is more volatile compared to CAE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check CAE's competition here
LMT vs PL-WT Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, PL-WT has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while PL-WT trades at $23.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas PL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to PL-WT's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to PL-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check PL-WT's competition here
LMT vs HXL Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, HXL has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while HXL trades at $98.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas HXL's P/E ratio is 47.68. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to HXL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is more volatile compared to HXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check HXL's competition here
LMT vs AVAV Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, AVAV has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while AVAV trades at $142.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas AVAV's P/E ratio is 44.62. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to AVAV's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to AVAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check AVAV's competition here
LMT vs LOAR Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, LOAR has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while LOAR trades at $72.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas LOAR's P/E ratio is 61.88. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to LOAR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to LOAR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check LOAR's competition here
LMT vs KRMN Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, KRMN has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while KRMN trades at $48.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas KRMN's P/E ratio is 118.95. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to KRMN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to KRMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check KRMN's competition here
LMT vs MRCY Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, MRCY has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while MRCY trades at $103.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas MRCY's P/E ratio is 93.09. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to MRCY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to MRCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check MRCY's competition here
LMT vs VSEC Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, VSEC has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while VSEC trades at $205.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas VSEC's P/E ratio is 49.25. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to VSEC's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to VSEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check VSEC's competition here
LMT vs AIR Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, AIR has a market cap of 5.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while AIR trades at $131.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas AIR's P/E ratio is 29.06. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to AIR's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to AIR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check AIR's competition here
LMT vs AMTM Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, AMTM has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while AMTM trades at $20.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas AMTM's P/E ratio is 9.02. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to AMTM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to AMTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check AMTM's competition here
LMT vs AJRD Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, AJRD has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while AJRD trades at $57.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas AJRD's P/E ratio is 63.03. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to AJRD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is more volatile compared to AJRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check AJRD's competition here
LMT vs SPR Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, SPR has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while SPR trades at $39.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas SPR's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to SPR's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to SPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check SPR's competition here
LMT vs FLY Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, FLY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while FLY trades at $22.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas FLY's P/E ratio is -3.72. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to FLY's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to FLY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check FLY's competition here
LMT vs BETA Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, BETA has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while BETA trades at $17.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas BETA's P/E ratio is -1.43. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to BETA's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to BETA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check BETA's competition here
LMT vs IDEF Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, IDEF has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while IDEF trades at $31.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas IDEF's P/E ratio is 31.18. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to IDEF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is more volatile compared to IDEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check IDEF's competition here
LMT vs ACHR Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, ACHR has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while ACHR trades at $4.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas ACHR's P/E ratio is -5.10. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to ACHR's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to ACHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check ACHR's competition here
LMT vs AADX Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, AADX has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while AADX trades at $20.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas AADX's P/E ratio is -229.06. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to AADX's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to AADX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check AADX's competition here
LMT vs ATRO Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, ATRO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while ATRO trades at $72.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas ATRO's P/E ratio is 46.18. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to ATRO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to ATRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check ATRO's competition here
LMT vs LUNR Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, LUNR has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while LUNR trades at $15.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas LUNR's P/E ratio is -36.74. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to LUNR's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to LUNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check LUNR's competition here
LMT vs ACHR-WT Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, ACHR-WT has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while ACHR-WT trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas ACHR-WT's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to ACHR-WT's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to ACHR-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check ACHR-WT's competition here
LMT vs YSS Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, YSS has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while YSS trades at $19.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas YSS's P/E ratio is -14.31. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to YSS's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to YSS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check YSS's competition here
LMT vs DCO Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, DCO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while DCO trades at $162.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas DCO's P/E ratio is 45.02. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to DCO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to DCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check DCO's competition here
LMT vs RDW Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, RDW has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while RDW trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas RDW's P/E ratio is -9.01. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to RDW's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to RDW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check RDW's competition here
LMT vs VVX Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, VVX has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while VVX trades at $74.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas VVX's P/E ratio is 12.97. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to VVX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is more volatile compared to VVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check VVX's competition here
LMT vs TGI Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, TGI has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while TGI trades at $26.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas TGI's P/E ratio is 56.54. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to TGI's ROE of -0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is more volatile compared to TGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check TGI's competition here
LMT vs HAWK Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, HAWK has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while HAWK trades at $19.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas HAWK's P/E ratio is -16.30. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to HAWK's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to HAWK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check HAWK's competition here
LMT vs VOYG Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, VOYG has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while VOYG trades at $30.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas VOYG's P/E ratio is -15.27. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to VOYG's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to VOYG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check VOYG's competition here
LMT vs ARXS Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, ARXS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while ARXS trades at $40.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas ARXS's P/E ratio is 321.46. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to ARXS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to ARXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check ARXS's competition here
LMT vs KAMN Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, KAMN has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while KAMN trades at $45.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas KAMN's P/E ratio is 164.25. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to KAMN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is more volatile compared to KAMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check KAMN's competition here
LMT vs CDRE Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, CDRE has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while CDRE trades at $28.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas CDRE's P/E ratio is 29.28. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to CDRE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to CDRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check CDRE's competition here
LMT vs VEC Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, VEC has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while VEC trades at $32.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas VEC's P/E ratio is 11.09. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to VEC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to VEC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check VEC's competition here
LMT vs RDW-WT Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, RDW-WT has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while RDW-WT trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas RDW-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to RDW-WT's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to RDW-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check RDW-WT's competition here
LMT vs AVEX Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, AVEX has a market cap of 929.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while AVEX trades at $15.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas AVEX's P/E ratio is 35.03. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to AVEX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to AVEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check AVEX's competition here
LMT vs NPK Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, NPK has a market cap of 892.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while NPK trades at $124.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas NPK's P/E ratio is 27.73. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to NPK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is more volatile compared to NPK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check NPK's competition here
LMT vs EVEX Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, EVEX has a market cap of 729.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while EVEX trades at $2.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas EVEX's P/E ratio is -3.32. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to EVEX's ROE of -2.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to EVEX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check EVEX's competition here
LMT vs SKYH-WT Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, SKYH-WT has a market cap of 710.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while SKYH-WT trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas SKYH-WT's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to SKYH-WT's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to SKYH-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check SKYH-WT's competition here
LMT vs PKE Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, PKE has a market cap of 703.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while PKE trades at $34.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas PKE's P/E ratio is 60.18. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to PKE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to PKE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check PKE's competition here
LMT vs SWBI Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, SWBI has a market cap of 697.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while SWBI trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas SWBI's P/E ratio is 38.99. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to SWBI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to SWBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check SWBI's competition here
LMT vs RGR Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, RGR has a market cap of 615.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while RGR trades at $38.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas RGR's P/E ratio is 37.13. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to RGR's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is more volatile compared to RGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check RGR's competition here
LMT vs TATT Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, TATT has a market cap of 561.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while TATT trades at $41.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas TATT's P/E ratio is 33.55. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to TATT's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to TATT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check TATT's competition here
LMT vs EVEX-WT Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, EVEX-WT has a market cap of 378M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while EVEX-WT trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas EVEX-WT's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to EVEX-WT's ROE of -2.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is more volatile compared to EVEX-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check EVEX-WT's competition here
LMT vs ISSC Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, ISSC has a market cap of 337.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while ISSC trades at $18.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas ISSC's P/E ratio is 19.04. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to ISSC's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to ISSC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check ISSC's competition here
LMT vs POWW Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, POWW has a market cap of 288.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while POWW trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas POWW's P/E ratio is 248.00. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to POWW's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to POWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check POWW's competition here
LMT vs POWWP Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, POWWP has a market cap of 278.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while POWWP trades at $24.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas POWWP's P/E ratio is -1671.94. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to POWWP's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is more volatile compared to POWWP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check POWWP's competition here
LMT vs EH Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, EH has a market cap of 207.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while EH trades at $5.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas EH's P/E ratio is -46.59. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to EH's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to EH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check EH's competition here
LMT vs AIRO Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, AIRO has a market cap of 197.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while AIRO trades at $6.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas AIRO's P/E ratio is -11.30. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to AIRO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to AIRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check AIRO's competition here
LMT vs EVTL Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, EVTL has a market cap of 168.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while EVTL trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas EVTL's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to EVTL's ROE of +2.51%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to EVTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check EVTL's competition here
LMT vs SPCE Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, SPCE has a market cap of 160M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while SPCE trades at $2.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas SPCE's P/E ratio is -0.59. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to SPCE's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to SPCE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check SPCE's competition here
LMT vs JOBY-WT Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, JOBY-WT has a market cap of 155M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while JOBY-WT trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas JOBY-WT's P/E ratio is -0.65. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to JOBY-WT's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to JOBY-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check JOBY-WT's competition here
LMT vs SIF Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, SIF has a market cap of 138.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while SIF trades at $22.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas SIF's P/E ratio is 18.75. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to SIF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to SIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check SIF's competition here
LMT vs FJET Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, FJET has a market cap of 124.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while FJET trades at $4.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas FJET's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to FJET's ROE of -2.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to FJET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check FJET's competition here
LMT vs CODA Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, CODA has a market cap of 110.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while CODA trades at $9.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas CODA's P/E ratio is 22.74. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to CODA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to CODA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check CODA's competition here
LMT vs IVAC Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, IVAC has a market cap of 108.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while IVAC trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas IVAC's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to IVAC's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is more volatile compared to IVAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check IVAC's competition here
LMT vs DPRO Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, DPRO has a market cap of 107.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while DPRO trades at $4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas DPRO's P/E ratio is -5.09. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to DPRO's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to DPRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check DPRO's competition here
LMT vs PEW Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, PEW has a market cap of 87.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while PEW trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas PEW's P/E ratio is -15.82. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to PEW's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to PEW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check PEW's competition here
LMT vs OPXS Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, OPXS has a market cap of 87.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while OPXS trades at $12.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas OPXS's P/E ratio is 18.56. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to OPXS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to OPXS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check OPXS's competition here
LMT vs BYRN Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, BYRN has a market cap of 87.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while BYRN trades at $3.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas BYRN's P/E ratio is -21.47. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to BYRN's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to BYRN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check BYRN's competition here
LMT vs SIDU Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, SIDU has a market cap of 79.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while SIDU trades at $2.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas SIDU's P/E ratio is -2.30. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to SIDU's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to SIDU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check SIDU's competition here
LMT vs HOVR Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, HOVR has a market cap of 79.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while HOVR trades at $1.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas HOVR's P/E ratio is -3.03. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to HOVR's ROE of -2.58%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to HOVR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check HOVR's competition here
LMT vs HOVRW Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, HOVRW has a market cap of 75M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while HOVRW trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas HOVRW's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to HOVRW's ROE of -2.58%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to HOVRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check HOVRW's competition here
LMT vs VWAV Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, VWAV has a market cap of 69.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while VWAV trades at $4.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas VWAV's P/E ratio is -3.27. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to VWAV's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to VWAV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check VWAV's competition here
LMT vs CVU Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, CVU has a market cap of 67.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while CVU trades at $5.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas CVU's P/E ratio is 39.31. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to CVU's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to CVU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check CVU's competition here
LMT vs GPUS Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, GPUS has a market cap of 64.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while GPUS trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas GPUS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to GPUS's ROE of -1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to GPUS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check GPUS's competition here
LMT vs SPAI Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, SPAI has a market cap of 64.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while SPAI trades at $3.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas SPAI's P/E ratio is -5.38. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to SPAI's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to SPAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check SPAI's competition here
LMT vs LLAP Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, LLAP has a market cap of 51.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while LLAP trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas LLAP's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to LLAP's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is more volatile compared to LLAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check LLAP's competition here
LMT vs LLAP-WT Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, LLAP-WT has a market cap of 50M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while LLAP-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas LLAP-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to LLAP-WT's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to LLAP-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check LLAP-WT's competition here
LMT vs LILM Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, LILM has a market cap of 37.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while LILM trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas LILM's P/E ratio is 0.74. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to LILM's ROE of -3.24%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to LILM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check LILM's competition here
LMT vs ZENA Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, ZENA has a market cap of 35.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while ZENA trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas ZENA's P/E ratio is -0.86. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to ZENA's ROE of -1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to ZENA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check ZENA's competition here
LMT vs VTSI Comparison July 2026
LMT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LMT stands at 119.5B. In comparison, VTSI has a market cap of 35.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LMT is priced at $520.15, while VTSI trades at $3.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LMT currently has a P/E ratio of 19.57, whereas VTSI's P/E ratio is -14.09. In terms of profitability, LMT's ROE is +0.75%, compared to VTSI's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LMT is less volatile compared to VTSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LMT.Check VTSI's competition here