Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited
Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited (TAK) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (TAK) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TAK | $16.63 | -0.12% | 52.5B | 75.59 | $0.22 | +3.73% |
| ZTS | $116.87 | +0.70% | 49.3B | 19.41 | $6.02 | +1.76% |
| HLN | $9.58 | +0.52% | 42.7B | 19.16 | $0.50 | +1.98% |
| TEVA | $30.64 | -1.83% | 35.7B | 25.32 | $1.21 | N/A |
| VTRS | $14.59 | -1.08% | 17B | -4.86 | -$3.00 | +3.31% |
| ITCI | $131.87 | +0.00% | 14B | -180.64 | -$0.73 | N/A |
| RGC | $27.49 | -2.90% | 13.6B | -2749.00 | -$0.01 | N/A |
| NBIX | $127.68 | -1.93% | 12.8B | 27.29 | $4.68 | N/A |
| CTLT | $63.48 | +0.00% | 11.5B | -27.84 | -$2.28 | N/A |
| RDY | $13.67 | +0.66% | 11.4B | 18.72 | $0.73 | +0.67% |
Stock Comparison
TAK vs ZTS Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, ZTS has a market cap of 49.3B. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while ZTS trades at $116.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas ZTS's P/E ratio is 19.41. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ZTS's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to ZTS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check ZTS's competition here
TAK vs HLN Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, HLN has a market cap of 42.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while HLN trades at $9.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas HLN's P/E ratio is 19.16. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HLN's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to HLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check HLN's competition here
TAK vs TEVA Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, TEVA has a market cap of 35.7B. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while TEVA trades at $30.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas TEVA's P/E ratio is 25.32. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TEVA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to TEVA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check TEVA's competition here
TAK vs VTRS Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, VTRS has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while VTRS trades at $14.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas VTRS's P/E ratio is -4.86. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VTRS's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to VTRS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check VTRS's competition here
TAK vs ITCI Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, ITCI has a market cap of 14B. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while ITCI trades at $131.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas ITCI's P/E ratio is -180.64. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ITCI's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is more volatile compared to ITCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check ITCI's competition here
TAK vs RGC Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, RGC has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while RGC trades at $27.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas RGC's P/E ratio is -2749.00. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RGC's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to RGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check RGC's competition here
TAK vs NBIX Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, NBIX has a market cap of 12.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while NBIX trades at $127.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas NBIX's P/E ratio is 27.29. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NBIX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to NBIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check NBIX's competition here
TAK vs CTLT Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, CTLT has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while CTLT trades at $63.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas CTLT's P/E ratio is -27.84. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CTLT's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is more volatile compared to CTLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check CTLT's competition here
TAK vs RDY Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, RDY has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while RDY trades at $13.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas RDY's P/E ratio is 18.72. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RDY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to RDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check RDY's competition here
TAK vs ELAN Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, ELAN has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while ELAN trades at $22.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas ELAN's P/E ratio is -48.39. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ELAN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to ELAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check ELAN's competition here
TAK vs LNTH Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, LNTH has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while LNTH trades at $84.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas LNTH's P/E ratio is 24.73. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LNTH's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to LNTH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check LNTH's competition here
TAK vs INDV Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, INDV has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while INDV trades at $33.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas INDV's P/E ratio is 20.26. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to INDV's ROE of -0.99%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to INDV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check INDV's competition here
TAK vs AMRX Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, AMRX has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while AMRX trades at $12.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas AMRX's P/E ratio is 56.91. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AMRX's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to AMRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check AMRX's competition here
TAK vs SUPN Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, SUPN has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while SUPN trades at $49.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas SUPN's P/E ratio is -73.06. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SUPN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to SUPN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check SUPN's competition here
TAK vs HCM Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, HCM has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while HCM trades at $14.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas HCM's P/E ratio is 5.28. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HCM's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to HCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check HCM's competition here
TAK vs PAHC Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, PAHC has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while PAHC trades at $55.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas PAHC's P/E ratio is 24.41. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PAHC's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to PAHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check PAHC's competition here
TAK vs DCPH Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, DCPH has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while DCPH trades at $25.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas DCPH's P/E ratio is -11.58. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DCPH's ROE of -0.56%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is more volatile compared to DCPH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check DCPH's competition here
TAK vs AVDL Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, AVDL has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while AVDL trades at $21.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas AVDL's P/E ratio is -1082.00. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AVDL's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is more volatile compared to AVDL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check AVDL's competition here
TAK vs BHC Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, BHC has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while BHC trades at $5.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas BHC's P/E ratio is 13.39. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BHC's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to BHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check BHC's competition here
TAK vs EMBCV Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, EMBCV has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while EMBCV trades at $33.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas EMBCV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EMBCV's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to EMBCV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check EMBCV's competition here
TAK vs DVAX Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, DVAX has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while DVAX trades at $15.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas DVAX's P/E ratio is -41.89. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DVAX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is more volatile compared to DVAX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check DVAX's competition here
TAK vs ANIP Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, ANIP has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while ANIP trades at $78.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas ANIP's P/E ratio is 23.69. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ANIP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to ANIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check ANIP's competition here
TAK vs PRGO Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, PRGO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while PRGO trades at $11.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas PRGO's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PRGO's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to PRGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check PRGO's competition here
TAK vs TARO Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, TARO has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while TARO trades at $42.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas TARO's P/E ratio is 30.05. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TARO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is more volatile compared to TARO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check TARO's competition here
TAK vs HROW Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, HROW has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while HROW trades at $39.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas HROW's P/E ratio is -283.57. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HROW's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to HROW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check HROW's competition here
TAK vs EVO Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, EVO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while EVO trades at $3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas EVO's P/E ratio is -9.26. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EVO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to EVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check EVO's competition here
TAK vs ALVO Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, ALVO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while ALVO trades at $3.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas ALVO's P/E ratio is 33.80. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ALVO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to ALVO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check ALVO's competition here
TAK vs PCRX Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, PCRX has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while PCRX trades at $24.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas PCRX's P/E ratio is 153.19. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PCRX's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to PCRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check PCRX's competition here
TAK vs COLL Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, COLL has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while COLL trades at $32.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas COLL's P/E ratio is 18.79. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to COLL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to COLL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check COLL's competition here
TAK vs CRON Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, CRON has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while CRON trades at $2.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas CRON's P/E ratio is -134.00. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CRON's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to CRON. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check CRON's competition here
TAK vs AMPH Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, AMPH has a market cap of 971.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while AMPH trades at $21.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas AMPH's P/E ratio is 10.55. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AMPH's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to AMPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check AMPH's competition here
TAK vs PETQ Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, PETQ has a market cap of 919.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while PETQ trades at $30.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas PETQ's P/E ratio is 83.73. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PETQ's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is more volatile compared to PETQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check PETQ's competition here
TAK vs TLRY Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, TLRY has a market cap of 786.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while TLRY trades at $6.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas TLRY's P/E ratio is -0.46. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TLRY's ROE of -0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to TLRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check TLRY's competition here
TAK vs IRWD Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, IRWD has a market cap of 640.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while IRWD trades at $3.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas IRWD's P/E ratio is 26.20. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IRWD's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to IRWD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check IRWD's competition here
TAK vs BDSI Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, BDSI has a market cap of 577.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while BDSI trades at $5.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas BDSI's P/E ratio is 6.82. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BDSI's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is more volatile compared to BDSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check BDSI's competition here
TAK vs EMBC Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, EMBC has a market cap of 546M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while EMBC trades at $9.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas EMBC's P/E ratio is 3.91. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EMBC's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to EMBC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check EMBC's competition here
TAK vs CGC Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, CGC has a market cap of 532.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while CGC trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas CGC's P/E ratio is -0.88. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CGC's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to CGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check CGC's competition here
TAK vs KMDA Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, KMDA has a market cap of 477.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while KMDA trades at $8.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas KMDA's P/E ratio is 23.66. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KMDA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to KMDA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check KMDA's competition here
TAK vs EBS Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, EBS has a market cap of 415.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while EBS trades at $8.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas EBS's P/E ratio is 8.63. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EBS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to EBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check EBS's competition here
TAK vs AQST Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, AQST has a market cap of 405.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while AQST trades at $4.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas AQST's P/E ratio is -5.23. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AQST's ROE of +1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to AQST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check AQST's competition here
TAK vs ESPR Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, ESPR has a market cap of 397.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while ESPR trades at $1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas ESPR's P/E ratio is -17.36. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ESPR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to ESPR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check ESPR's competition here
TAK vs SNDL Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, SNDL has a market cap of 391.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while SNDL trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas SNDL's P/E ratio is -37.75. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SNDL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to SNDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check SNDL's competition here
TAK vs EOLS Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, EOLS has a market cap of 344.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while EOLS trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas EOLS's P/E ratio is -6.62. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EOLS's ROE of +2.68%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to EOLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check EOLS's competition here
TAK vs SIGA Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, SIGA has a market cap of 327.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while SIGA trades at $4.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas SIGA's P/E ratio is 14.28. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SIGA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to SIGA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check SIGA's competition here
TAK vs ORGO Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, ORGO has a market cap of 302.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while ORGO trades at $2.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas ORGO's P/E ratio is 15.67. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ORGO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to ORGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check ORGO's competition here
TAK vs ALIM Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, ALIM has a market cap of 301.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while ALIM trades at $5.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas ALIM's P/E ratio is 5.28. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ALIM's ROE of -1.59%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is more volatile compared to ALIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check ALIM's competition here
TAK vs LNDC Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, LNDC has a market cap of 263.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while LNDC trades at $8.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas LNDC's P/E ratio is -4.04. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LNDC's ROE of -14.63%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to LNDC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check LNDC's competition here
TAK vs TYHT Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, TYHT has a market cap of 229.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while TYHT trades at $11.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas TYHT's P/E ratio is -1.61. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TYHT's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to TYHT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check TYHT's competition here
TAK vs OGI Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, OGI has a market cap of 197M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while OGI trades at $1.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas OGI's P/E ratio is 13.14. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to OGI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to OGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check OGI's competition here
TAK vs ACB Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, ACB has a market cap of 192.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while ACB trades at $3.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas ACB's P/E ratio is -3.11. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ACB's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to ACB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check ACB's competition here
TAK vs LFCR Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, LFCR has a market cap of 188.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while LFCR trades at $5.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas LFCR's P/E ratio is -3.95. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LFCR's ROE of -1.82%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to LFCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check LFCR's competition here
TAK vs REPH Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, REPH has a market cap of 177.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while REPH trades at $2.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas REPH's P/E ratio is -8.04. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to REPH's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to REPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check REPH's competition here
TAK vs TKNO Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, TKNO has a market cap of 170.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while TKNO trades at $3.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas TKNO's P/E ratio is -9.94. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TKNO's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to TKNO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check TKNO's competition here
TAK vs CRDL Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, CRDL has a market cap of 156.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while CRDL trades at $1.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas CRDL's P/E ratio is -4.83. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CRDL's ROE of -2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to CRDL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check CRDL's competition here
TAK vs THTX Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, THTX has a market cap of 155.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while THTX trades at $3.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas THTX's P/E ratio is -17.84. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to THTX's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to THTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check THTX's competition here
TAK vs DERM Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, DERM has a market cap of 126.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while DERM trades at $5.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas DERM's P/E ratio is -10.96. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DERM's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to DERM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check DERM's competition here
TAK vs ASRT Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, ASRT has a market cap of 116.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while ASRT trades at $18.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas ASRT's P/E ratio is -3.81. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ASRT's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is more volatile compared to ASRT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check ASRT's competition here
TAK vs SCTL Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, SCTL has a market cap of 116.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while SCTL trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas SCTL's P/E ratio is -7.86. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SCTL's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to SCTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check SCTL's competition here
TAK vs PROC Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, PROC has a market cap of 102.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while PROC trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas PROC's P/E ratio is 1.53. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to PROC's ROE of -2.22%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is more volatile compared to PROC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check PROC's competition here
TAK vs OPTN Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, OPTN has a market cap of 97.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while OPTN trades at $9.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas OPTN's P/E ratio is -4.42. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to OPTN's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is more volatile compared to OPTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check OPTN's competition here
TAK vs ZOM Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, ZOM has a market cap of 95.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while ZOM trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas ZOM's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ZOM's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to ZOM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check ZOM's competition here
TAK vs GRVI Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, GRVI has a market cap of 88.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while GRVI trades at $4.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas GRVI's P/E ratio is 26.05. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GRVI's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to GRVI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check GRVI's competition here
TAK vs ZYNE Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, ZYNE has a market cap of 70.1M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while ZYNE trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas ZYNE's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ZYNE's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to ZYNE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check ZYNE's competition here
TAK vs ALVOW Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, ALVOW has a market cap of 66.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while ALVOW trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas ALVOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ALVOW's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to ALVOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check ALVOW's competition here
TAK vs BGM Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, BGM has a market cap of 66.8M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while BGM trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas BGM's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BGM's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to BGM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check BGM's competition here
TAK vs SSIC Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, SSIC has a market cap of 66.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while SSIC trades at $10.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas SSIC's P/E ratio is 11.93. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SSIC's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to SSIC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check SSIC's competition here
TAK vs VLNS Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, VLNS has a market cap of 61.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while VLNS trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas VLNS's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VLNS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to VLNS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check VLNS's competition here
TAK vs CPIX Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, CPIX has a market cap of 60.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while CPIX trades at $4.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas CPIX's P/E ratio is -21.37. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CPIX's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to CPIX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check CPIX's competition here
TAK vs DRRX Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, DRRX has a market cap of 59.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while DRRX trades at $1.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas DRRX's P/E ratio is -4.44. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DRRX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is more volatile compared to DRRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check DRRX's competition here
TAK vs INCR Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, INCR has a market cap of 50.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while INCR trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas INCR's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to INCR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to INCR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check INCR's competition here
TAK vs JUPW Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, JUPW has a market cap of 49.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while JUPW trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas JUPW's P/E ratio is -2.41. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to JUPW's ROE of -2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to JUPW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check JUPW's competition here
TAK vs IXHL Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, IXHL has a market cap of 46.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while IXHL trades at $4.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas IXHL's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IXHL's ROE of -1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to IXHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check IXHL's competition here
TAK vs SCYX Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, SCYX has a market cap of 45.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while SCYX trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas SCYX's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SCYX's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to SCYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check SCYX's competition here
TAK vs ZYBT Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, ZYBT has a market cap of 42.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while ZYBT trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas ZYBT's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ZYBT's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to ZYBT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check ZYBT's competition here
TAK vs QLI Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, QLI has a market cap of 38.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while QLI trades at $5.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas QLI's P/E ratio is -4.92. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to QLI's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is more volatile compared to QLI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check QLI's competition here
TAK vs RMTI Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, RMTI has a market cap of 34.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while RMTI trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas RMTI's P/E ratio is -5.82. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RMTI's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to RMTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check RMTI's competition here
TAK vs HEXO Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, HEXO has a market cap of 31.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while HEXO trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas HEXO's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HEXO's ROE of -2.06%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to HEXO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check HEXO's competition here
TAK vs TXMD Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, TXMD has a market cap of 24.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while TXMD trades at $2.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas TXMD's P/E ratio is -35.33. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TXMD's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to TXMD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check TXMD's competition here
TAK vs CYTH Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, CYTH has a market cap of 23.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while CYTH trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas CYTH's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CYTH's ROE of -7.30%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is more volatile compared to CYTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check CYTH's competition here
TAK vs AYTU Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, AYTU has a market cap of 20.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while AYTU trades at $2.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas AYTU's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AYTU's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to AYTU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check AYTU's competition here
TAK vs EVOK Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, EVOK has a market cap of 18.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while EVOK trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas EVOK's P/E ratio is -7.97. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EVOK's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is more volatile compared to EVOK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check EVOK's competition here
TAK vs TLPH Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, TLPH has a market cap of 15.7M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while TLPH trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas TLPH's P/E ratio is -2.26. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TLPH's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to TLPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check TLPH's competition here
TAK vs QNTM Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, QNTM has a market cap of 14.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while QNTM trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas QNTM's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to QNTM's ROE of -4.19%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to QNTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check QNTM's competition here
TAK vs ACRX Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, ACRX has a market cap of 14.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while ACRX trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas ACRX's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ACRX's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to ACRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check ACRX's competition here
TAK vs BFRI Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, BFRI has a market cap of 12.6M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while BFRI trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas BFRI's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BFRI's ROE of -11.39%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to BFRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check BFRI's competition here
TAK vs COSM Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, COSM has a market cap of 11.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while COSM trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas COSM's P/E ratio is -0.60. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to COSM's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to COSM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check COSM's competition here
TAK vs YCBD Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, YCBD has a market cap of 10.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while YCBD trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas YCBD's P/E ratio is 1.67. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to YCBD's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to YCBD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check YCBD's competition here
TAK vs AGRX Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, AGRX has a market cap of 10.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while AGRX trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas AGRX's P/E ratio is -0.89. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AGRX's ROE of +1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to AGRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check AGRX's competition here
TAK vs NLTX Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, NLTX has a market cap of 8.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while NLTX trades at $3.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas NLTX's P/E ratio is -0.28. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NLTX's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to NLTX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check NLTX's competition here
TAK vs LCI Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, LCI has a market cap of 7.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while LCI trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas LCI's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LCI's ROE of +1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to LCI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check LCI's competition here
TAK vs BGXX Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, BGXX has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while BGXX trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas BGXX's P/E ratio is -0.76. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BGXX's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is more volatile compared to BGXX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check BGXX's competition here
TAK vs ADMP Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, ADMP has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while ADMP trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas ADMP's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ADMP's ROE of -2.09%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to ADMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check ADMP's competition here
TAK vs GELS Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, GELS has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while GELS trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas GELS's P/E ratio is -1.35. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GELS's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to GELS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check GELS's competition here
TAK vs EGRX Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, EGRX has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while EGRX trades at $0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas EGRX's P/E ratio is 5.43. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EGRX's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to EGRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check EGRX's competition here
TAK vs SBFM Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, SBFM has a market cap of 4.9M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while SBFM trades at $1.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas SBFM's P/E ratio is -0.69. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SBFM's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to SBFM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check SBFM's competition here
TAK vs MNK Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, MNK has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while MNK trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas MNK's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MNK's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to MNK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check MNK's competition here
TAK vs FLGC Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, FLGC has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while FLGC trades at $7.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas FLGC's P/E ratio is -0.19. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FLGC's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to FLGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check FLGC's competition here
TAK vs GHSI Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, GHSI has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while GHSI trades at $3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas GHSI's P/E ratio is -0.79. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GHSI's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is more volatile compared to GHSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check GHSI's competition here
TAK vs RDHL Comparison April 2026
TAK plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, TAK stands at 52.5B. In comparison, RDHL has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, TAK is priced at $16.63, while RDHL trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
TAK currently has a P/E ratio of 75.59, whereas RDHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, TAK's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RDHL's ROE of +1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, TAK is less volatile compared to RDHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for TAK.Check RDHL's competition here