Glass House Brands Inc (NYSE: GLAS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Glass House Brands Inc (NYSE: GLAS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLAS stands at 768.8M. In comparison, CTA-PA has a market cap of 59.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GLAS is priced at $10.02 on the NYSE, while CTA-PA trades at $53.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLAS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.75, whereas CTA-PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLAS's ROE is N/A, compared to CTA-PA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GLAS is more volatile compared to CTA-PA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLAS.Check CTA-PA's competition here

Glass House Brands Inc (NYSE: GLAS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLAS stands at 768.8M. In comparison, CTVA has a market cap of 59.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GLAS is priced at $10.02 on the NYSE, while CTVA trades at $89.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLAS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.75, whereas CTVA's P/E ratio is 24.19. In terms of profitability, GLAS's ROE is N/A, compared to CTVA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GLAS is more volatile compared to CTVA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLAS.Check CTVA's competition here

Glass House Brands Inc (NYSE: GLAS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLAS stands at 768.8M. In comparison, CTA-PB has a market cap of 59.5B. Regarding current trading prices, GLAS is priced at $10.02 on the NYSE, while CTA-PB trades at $66.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLAS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.75, whereas CTA-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLAS's ROE is N/A, compared to CTA-PB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, GLAS is more volatile compared to CTA-PB. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLAS.Check CTA-PB's competition here

Glass House Brands Inc (NYSE: GLAS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLAS stands at 768.8M. In comparison, NTR has a market cap of 32.7B. Regarding current trading prices, GLAS is priced at $10.02 on the NYSE, while NTR trades at $68.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLAS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.75, whereas NTR's P/E ratio is 13.73. In terms of profitability, GLAS's ROE is N/A, compared to NTR's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, GLAS is more volatile compared to NTR. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLAS.Check NTR's competition here

Glass House Brands Inc (NYSE: GLAS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLAS stands at 768.8M. In comparison, CF has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, GLAS is priced at $10.02 on the NYSE, while CF trades at $125.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLAS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.75, whereas CF's P/E ratio is 10.84. In terms of profitability, GLAS's ROE is N/A, compared to CF's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, GLAS is more volatile compared to CF. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLAS.Check CF's competition here

Glass House Brands Inc (NYSE: GLAS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLAS stands at 768.8M. In comparison, MOS has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, GLAS is priced at $10.02 on the NYSE, while MOS trades at $22.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLAS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.75, whereas MOS's P/E ratio is 12.26. In terms of profitability, GLAS's ROE is N/A, compared to MOS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, GLAS is more volatile compared to MOS. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLAS.Check MOS's competition here

Glass House Brands Inc (NYSE: GLAS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLAS stands at 768.8M. In comparison, ICL has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, GLAS is priced at $10.02 on the NYSE, while ICL trades at $5.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLAS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.75, whereas ICL's P/E ratio is 13.54. In terms of profitability, GLAS's ROE is N/A, compared to ICL's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, GLAS is more volatile compared to ICL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLAS.Check ICL's competition here

Glass House Brands Inc (NYSE: GLAS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLAS stands at 768.8M. In comparison, SMG has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, GLAS is priced at $10.02 on the NYSE, while SMG trades at $69.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLAS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.75, whereas SMG's P/E ratio is 15.79. In terms of profitability, GLAS's ROE is N/A, compared to SMG's ROE of -0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, GLAS is more volatile compared to SMG. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLAS.Check SMG's competition here

Glass House Brands Inc (NYSE: GLAS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLAS stands at 768.8M. In comparison, FMC has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, GLAS is priced at $10.02 on the NYSE, while FMC trades at $11.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLAS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.75, whereas FMC's P/E ratio is 4.43. In terms of profitability, GLAS's ROE is N/A, compared to FMC's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, GLAS is more volatile compared to FMC. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLAS.Check FMC's competition here

Glass House Brands Inc (NYSE: GLAS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLAS stands at 768.8M. In comparison, UAN has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, GLAS is priced at $10.02 on the NYSE, while UAN trades at $123.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLAS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.75, whereas UAN's P/E ratio is 10.62. In terms of profitability, GLAS's ROE is N/A, compared to UAN's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, GLAS is more volatile compared to UAN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLAS.Check UAN's competition here

Glass House Brands Inc (NYSE: GLAS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLAS stands at 768.8M. In comparison, IPI has a market cap of 459.8M. Regarding current trading prices, GLAS is priced at $10.02 on the NYSE, while IPI trades at $34.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLAS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.75, whereas IPI's P/E ratio is 20.50. In terms of profitability, GLAS's ROE is N/A, compared to IPI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, GLAS is more volatile compared to IPI. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLAS.Check IPI's competition here

Glass House Brands Inc (NYSE: GLAS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLAS stands at 768.8M. In comparison, AFRIW has a market cap of 265.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GLAS is priced at $10.02 on the NYSE, while AFRIW trades at $0.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLAS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.75, whereas AFRIW's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, GLAS's ROE is N/A, compared to AFRIW's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, GLAS is less volatile compared to AFRIW. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLAS.Check AFRIW's competition here

Glass House Brands Inc (NYSE: GLAS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLAS stands at 768.8M. In comparison, AVD has a market cap of 73.4M. Regarding current trading prices, GLAS is priced at $10.02 on the NYSE, while AVD trades at $2.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLAS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.75, whereas AVD's P/E ratio is -8.84. In terms of profitability, GLAS's ROE is N/A, compared to AVD's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, GLAS is more volatile compared to AVD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLAS.Check AVD's competition here

Glass House Brands Inc (NYSE: GLAS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLAS stands at 768.8M. In comparison, BHIL-WT has a market cap of 49M. Regarding current trading prices, GLAS is priced at $10.02 on the NYSE, while BHIL-WT trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLAS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.75, whereas BHIL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, GLAS's ROE is N/A, compared to BHIL-WT's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, GLAS is less volatile compared to BHIL-WT. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLAS.Check BHIL-WT's competition here

Glass House Brands Inc (NYSE: GLAS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLAS stands at 768.8M. In comparison, BHST has a market cap of 32.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GLAS is priced at $10.02 on the NYSE, while BHST trades at $1.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLAS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.75, whereas BHST's P/E ratio is -3.76. In terms of profitability, GLAS's ROE is N/A, compared to BHST's ROE of -0.88%. Regarding short-term risk, GLAS is less volatile compared to BHST. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLAS.Check BHST's competition here

Glass House Brands Inc (NYSE: GLAS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLAS stands at 768.8M. In comparison, CGA has a market cap of 29.3M. Regarding current trading prices, GLAS is priced at $10.02 on the NYSE, while CGA trades at $1.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLAS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.75, whereas CGA's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, GLAS's ROE is N/A, compared to CGA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, GLAS is more volatile compared to CGA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLAS.Check CGA's competition here

Glass House Brands Inc (NYSE: GLAS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLAS stands at 768.8M. In comparison, BIOX has a market cap of 20.9M. Regarding current trading prices, GLAS is priced at $10.02 on the NYSE, while BIOX trades at $0.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLAS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.75, whereas BIOX's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, GLAS's ROE is N/A, compared to BIOX's ROE of -1.51%. Regarding short-term risk, GLAS is less volatile compared to BIOX. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLAS.Check BIOX's competition here

Glass House Brands Inc (NYSE: GLAS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLAS stands at 768.8M. In comparison, LVRO has a market cap of 15.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GLAS is priced at $10.02 on the NYSE, while LVRO trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLAS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.75, whereas LVRO's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, GLAS's ROE is N/A, compared to LVRO's ROE of +11.90%. Regarding short-term risk, GLAS is more volatile compared to LVRO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLAS.Check LVRO's competition here

Glass House Brands Inc (NYSE: GLAS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLAS stands at 768.8M. In comparison, SEED has a market cap of 7.6M. Regarding current trading prices, GLAS is priced at $10.02 on the NYSE, while SEED trades at $1.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLAS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.75, whereas SEED's P/E ratio is -0.99. In terms of profitability, GLAS's ROE is N/A, compared to SEED's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, GLAS is more volatile compared to SEED. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLAS.Check SEED's competition here

Glass House Brands Inc (NYSE: GLAS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLAS stands at 768.8M. In comparison, SVFD has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, GLAS is priced at $10.02 on the NYSE, while SVFD trades at $1.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLAS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.75, whereas SVFD's P/E ratio is 0.07. In terms of profitability, GLAS's ROE is N/A, compared to SVFD's ROE of -367.30%. Regarding short-term risk, GLAS is more volatile compared to SVFD. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLAS.Check SVFD's competition here

Glass House Brands Inc (NYSE: GLAS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLAS stands at 768.8M. In comparison, FMTO has a market cap of 3.1M. Regarding current trading prices, GLAS is priced at $10.02 on the NYSE, while FMTO trades at $3.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLAS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.75, whereas FMTO's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, GLAS's ROE is N/A, compared to FMTO's ROE of -2.43%. Regarding short-term risk, GLAS is less volatile compared to FMTO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLAS.Check FMTO's competition here

Glass House Brands Inc (NYSE: GLAS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLAS stands at 768.8M. In comparison, BHIL has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, GLAS is priced at $10.02 on the NYSE, while BHIL trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLAS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.75, whereas BHIL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, GLAS's ROE is N/A, compared to BHIL's ROE of -0.82%. Regarding short-term risk, GLAS is more volatile compared to BHIL. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLAS.Check BHIL's competition here

Glass House Brands Inc (NYSE: GLAS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLAS stands at 768.8M. In comparison, RKDA has a market cap of 990.3K. Regarding current trading prices, GLAS is priced at $10.02 on the NYSE, while RKDA trades at $0.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLAS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.75, whereas RKDA's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, GLAS's ROE is N/A, compared to RKDA's ROE of -2.19%. Regarding short-term risk, GLAS is more volatile compared to RKDA. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLAS.Check RKDA's competition here

Glass House Brands Inc (NYSE: GLAS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLAS stands at 768.8M. In comparison, YTEN has a market cap of 345.5K. Regarding current trading prices, GLAS is priced at $10.02 on the NYSE, while YTEN trades at $0.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLAS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.75, whereas YTEN's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, GLAS's ROE is N/A, compared to YTEN's ROE of -15.08%. Regarding short-term risk, GLAS is less volatile compared to YTEN. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLAS.Check YTEN's competition here

Glass House Brands Inc (NYSE: GLAS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLAS stands at 768.8M. In comparison, NXTS has a market cap of 101.9K. Regarding current trading prices, GLAS is priced at $10.02 on the NYSE, while NXTS trades at $1.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLAS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.75, whereas NXTS's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, GLAS's ROE is N/A, compared to NXTS's ROE of -0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, GLAS is less volatile compared to NXTS. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLAS.Check NXTS's competition here

Glass House Brands Inc (NYSE: GLAS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLAS stands at 768.8M. In comparison, TNH has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GLAS is priced at $10.02 on the NYSE, while TNH trades at $83.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLAS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.75, whereas TNH's P/E ratio is 10.13. In terms of profitability, GLAS's ROE is N/A, compared to TNH's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, GLAS is more volatile compared to TNH. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLAS.Check TNH's competition here

Glass House Brands Inc (NYSE: GLAS) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the NYSE reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, GLAS stands at 768.8M. In comparison, MBII has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, GLAS is priced at $10.02 on the NYSE, while MBII trades at $0.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

GLAS currently has a P/E ratio of -17.75, whereas MBII's P/E ratio is -6.82. In terms of profitability, GLAS's ROE is N/A, compared to MBII's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, GLAS is less volatile compared to MBII. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for GLAS.Check MBII's competition here