Salzgitter AG

SZGPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZGPF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AMSYF has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SZGPF is priced at $28.00, while AMSYF trades at $31.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.26, whereas AMSYF's P/E ratio is 20.15. In terms of profitability, SZGPF's ROE is -0.09%, compared to AMSYF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SZGPF is more volatile compared to AMSYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZGPF.Check AMSYF's competition here

SZGPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZGPF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VLOWY has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, SZGPF is priced at $28.00, while VLOWY trades at $3.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.26, whereas VLOWY's P/E ratio is 10.42. In terms of profitability, SZGPF's ROE is -0.09%, compared to VLOWY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SZGPF is less volatile compared to VLOWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZGPF.Check VLOWY's competition here

SZGPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZGPF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NPSCY has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SZGPF is priced at $28.00, while NPSCY trades at $6.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.26, whereas NPSCY's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, SZGPF's ROE is -0.09%, compared to NPSCY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SZGPF is more volatile compared to NPSCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZGPF.Check NPSCY's competition here

SZGPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZGPF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NISTF has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SZGPF is priced at $28.00, while NISTF trades at $21.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.26, whereas NISTF's P/E ratio is 8.28. In terms of profitability, SZGPF's ROE is -0.09%, compared to NISTF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SZGPF is more volatile compared to NISTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZGPF.Check NISTF's competition here

SZGPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZGPF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SVJTY has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SZGPF is priced at $28.00, while SVJTY trades at $21.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.26, whereas SVJTY's P/E ratio is 4.49. In terms of profitability, SZGPF's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SVJTY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SZGPF is more volatile compared to SVJTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZGPF.Check SVJTY's competition here

SZGPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZGPF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TATLY has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SZGPF is priced at $28.00, while TATLY trades at $9.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.26, whereas TATLY's P/E ratio is -185.00. In terms of profitability, SZGPF's ROE is -0.09%, compared to TATLY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SZGPF is more volatile compared to TATLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZGPF.Check TATLY's competition here

SZGPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZGPF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HMTLY has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SZGPF is priced at $28.00, while HMTLY trades at $265.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.26, whereas HMTLY's P/E ratio is 31.23. In terms of profitability, SZGPF's ROE is -0.09%, compared to HMTLY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SZGPF is more volatile compared to HMTLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZGPF.Check HMTLY's competition here

SZGPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZGPF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CISXF has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SZGPF is priced at $28.00, while CISXF trades at $14.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.26, whereas CISXF's P/E ratio is 106.43. In terms of profitability, SZGPF's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CISXF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SZGPF is less volatile compared to CISXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZGPF.Check CISXF's competition here

SZGPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZGPF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, JFEEF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SZGPF is priced at $28.00, while JFEEF trades at $11.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.26, whereas JFEEF's P/E ratio is 12.26. In terms of profitability, SZGPF's ROE is -0.09%, compared to JFEEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SZGPF is less volatile compared to JFEEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZGPF.Check JFEEF's competition here

SZGPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZGPF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BLSFF has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SZGPF is priced at $28.00, while BLSFF trades at $16.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.26, whereas BLSFF's P/E ratio is 20.34. In terms of profitability, SZGPF's ROE is -0.09%, compared to BLSFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SZGPF is more volatile compared to BLSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZGPF.Check BLSFF's competition here

SZGPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZGPF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, BLSFY has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SZGPF is priced at $28.00, while BLSFY trades at $76.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.26, whereas BLSFY's P/E ratio is 19.13. In terms of profitability, SZGPF's ROE is -0.09%, compared to BLSFY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SZGPF is more volatile compared to BLSFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZGPF.Check BLSFY's competition here

SZGPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZGPF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, KUMBF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SZGPF is priced at $28.00, while KUMBF trades at $19.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.26, whereas KUMBF's P/E ratio is 8.12. In terms of profitability, SZGPF's ROE is -0.09%, compared to KUMBF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SZGPF is more volatile compared to KUMBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZGPF.Check KUMBF's competition here

SZGPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZGPF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SSAAF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SZGPF is priced at $28.00, while SSAAF trades at $6.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.26, whereas SSAAF's P/E ratio is 13.62. In terms of profitability, SZGPF's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SSAAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SZGPF is more volatile compared to SSAAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZGPF.Check SSAAF's competition here

SZGPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZGPF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, KIROY has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SZGPF is priced at $28.00, while KIROY trades at $5.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.26, whereas KIROY's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, SZGPF's ROE is -0.09%, compared to KIROY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SZGPF is more volatile compared to KIROY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZGPF.Check KIROY's competition here

SZGPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZGPF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SSAAY has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SZGPF is priced at $28.00, while SSAAY trades at $2.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.26, whereas SSAAY's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, SZGPF's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SSAAY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SZGPF is more volatile compared to SSAAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZGPF.Check SSAAY's competition here

SZGPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZGPF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VLOUF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SZGPF is priced at $28.00, while VLOUF trades at $19.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.26, whereas VLOUF's P/E ratio is 11.02. In terms of profitability, SZGPF's ROE is -0.09%, compared to VLOUF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SZGPF is more volatile compared to VLOUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZGPF.Check VLOUF's competition here

SZGPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZGPF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, KBSTF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SZGPF is priced at $28.00, while KBSTF trades at $11.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.26, whereas KBSTF's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, SZGPF's ROE is -0.09%, compared to KBSTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SZGPF is more volatile compared to KBSTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZGPF.Check KBSTF's competition here

SZGPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZGPF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ICHBF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SZGPF is priced at $28.00, while ICHBF trades at $9.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.26, whereas ICHBF's P/E ratio is 5.84. In terms of profitability, SZGPF's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ICHBF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SZGPF is more volatile compared to ICHBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZGPF.Check ICHBF's competition here

SZGPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZGPF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VLPNF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SZGPF is priced at $28.00, while VLPNF trades at $21.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.26, whereas VLPNF's P/E ratio is 20.69. In terms of profitability, SZGPF's ROE is -0.09%, compared to VLPNF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SZGPF is less volatile compared to VLPNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZGPF.Check VLPNF's competition here

SZGPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZGPF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, OUTKY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SZGPF is priced at $28.00, while OUTKY trades at $1.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.26, whereas OUTKY's P/E ratio is -38.00. In terms of profitability, SZGPF's ROE is -0.09%, compared to OUTKY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SZGPF is less volatile compared to OUTKY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZGPF.Check OUTKY's competition here

SZGPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZGPF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, YMTKF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SZGPF is priced at $28.00, while YMTKF trades at $50.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.26, whereas YMTKF's P/E ratio is 14.49. In terms of profitability, SZGPF's ROE is -0.09%, compared to YMTKF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SZGPF is more volatile compared to YMTKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZGPF.Check YMTKF's competition here

SZGPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZGPF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ANIOY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SZGPF is priced at $28.00, while ANIOY trades at $5.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.26, whereas ANIOY's P/E ratio is 26.68. In terms of profitability, SZGPF's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ANIOY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SZGPF is more volatile compared to ANIOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZGPF.Check ANIOY's competition here

SZGPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZGPF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, STZHF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SZGPF is priced at $28.00, while STZHF trades at $49.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.26, whereas STZHF's P/E ratio is 21.86. In terms of profitability, SZGPF's ROE is -0.09%, compared to STZHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SZGPF is more volatile compared to STZHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZGPF.Check STZHF's competition here

SZGPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZGPF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MAANF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SZGPF is priced at $28.00, while MAANF trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.26, whereas MAANF's P/E ratio is -2.81. In terms of profitability, SZGPF's ROE is -0.09%, compared to MAANF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SZGPF is less volatile compared to MAANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZGPF.Check MAANF's competition here

SZGPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZGPF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, APMSF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SZGPF is priced at $28.00, while APMSF trades at $30.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.26, whereas APMSF's P/E ratio is 8.62. In terms of profitability, SZGPF's ROE is -0.09%, compared to APMSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SZGPF is more volatile compared to APMSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZGPF.Check APMSF's competition here

SZGPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZGPF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SMSMY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SZGPF is priced at $28.00, while SMSMY trades at $11.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.26, whereas SMSMY's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, SZGPF's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SMSMY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SZGPF is less volatile compared to SMSMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZGPF.Check SMSMY's competition here

SZGPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZGPF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, APEMY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SZGPF is priced at $28.00, while APEMY trades at $29.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.26, whereas APEMY's P/E ratio is 7.78. In terms of profitability, SZGPF's ROE is -0.09%, compared to APEMY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SZGPF is more volatile compared to APEMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZGPF.Check APEMY's competition here

SZGPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZGPF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ANGGF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SZGPF is priced at $28.00, while ANGGF trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.26, whereas ANGGF's P/E ratio is -1.89. In terms of profitability, SZGPF's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ANGGF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SZGPF is less volatile compared to ANGGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZGPF.Check ANGGF's competition here

SZGPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZGPF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SMUPF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SZGPF is priced at $28.00, while SMUPF trades at $9.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.26, whereas SMUPF's P/E ratio is -85.27. In terms of profitability, SZGPF's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SMUPF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SZGPF is less volatile compared to SMUPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZGPF.Check SMUPF's competition here

SZGPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZGPF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, EVRZF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SZGPF is priced at $28.00, while EVRZF trades at $1.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.26, whereas EVRZF's P/E ratio is 0.51. In terms of profitability, SZGPF's ROE is -0.09%, compared to EVRZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SZGPF is more volatile compared to EVRZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZGPF.Check EVRZF's competition here

SZGPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZGPF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MCHIF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SZGPF is priced at $28.00, while MCHIF trades at $21.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.26, whereas MCHIF's P/E ratio is 15.55. In terms of profitability, SZGPF's ROE is -0.09%, compared to MCHIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SZGPF is more volatile compared to MCHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZGPF.Check MCHIF's competition here

SZGPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZGPF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CIAFF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SZGPF is priced at $28.00, while CIAFF trades at $2.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.26, whereas CIAFF's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, SZGPF's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CIAFF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SZGPF is more volatile compared to CIAFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZGPF.Check CIAFF's competition here

SZGPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZGPF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, OUTFF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SZGPF is priced at $28.00, while OUTFF trades at $3.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.26, whereas OUTFF's P/E ratio is -30.10. In terms of profitability, SZGPF's ROE is -0.09%, compared to OUTFF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SZGPF is less volatile compared to OUTFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZGPF.Check OUTFF's competition here

SZGPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZGPF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SZGPY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SZGPF is priced at $28.00, while SZGPY trades at $2.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.26, whereas SZGPY's P/E ratio is -3.02. In terms of profitability, SZGPF's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SZGPY's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SZGPF is more volatile compared to SZGPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZGPF.Check SZGPY's competition here

SZGPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZGPF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CKSNF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SZGPF is priced at $28.00, while CKSNF trades at $5.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.26, whereas CKSNF's P/E ratio is 12.05. In terms of profitability, SZGPF's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CKSNF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SZGPF is less volatile compared to CKSNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZGPF.Check CKSNF's competition here

SZGPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZGPF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CKSNY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SZGPF is priced at $28.00, while CKSNY trades at $5.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.26, whereas CKSNY's P/E ratio is 11.86. In terms of profitability, SZGPF's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CKSNY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SZGPF is more volatile compared to CKSNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZGPF.Check CKSNY's competition here

SZGPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZGPF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CUGCY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SZGPF is priced at $28.00, while CUGCY trades at $4.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.26, whereas CUGCY's P/E ratio is 42.82. In terms of profitability, SZGPF's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CUGCY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SZGPF is more volatile compared to CUGCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZGPF.Check CUGCY's competition here

SZGPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZGPF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, LIFZF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SZGPF is priced at $28.00, while LIFZF trades at $19.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.26, whereas LIFZF's P/E ratio is 12.44. In terms of profitability, SZGPF's ROE is -0.09%, compared to LIFZF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SZGPF is more volatile compared to LIFZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZGPF.Check LIFZF's competition here

SZGPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZGPF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, SYPLF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SZGPF is priced at $28.00, while SYPLF trades at $15.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.26, whereas SYPLF's P/E ratio is 30.37. In terms of profitability, SZGPF's ROE is -0.09%, compared to SYPLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SZGPF is less volatile compared to SYPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZGPF.Check SYPLF's competition here

SZGPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZGPF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ERELY has a market cap of 958.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SZGPF is priced at $28.00, while ERELY trades at $7.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.26, whereas ERELY's P/E ratio is 23.77. In terms of profitability, SZGPF's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ERELY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SZGPF is more volatile compared to ERELY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZGPF.Check ERELY's competition here

SZGPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZGPF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, USNZY has a market cap of 943M. Regarding current trading prices, SZGPF is priced at $28.00, while USNZY trades at $0.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.26, whereas USNZY's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, SZGPF's ROE is -0.09%, compared to USNZY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SZGPF is more volatile compared to USNZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZGPF.Check USNZY's competition here

SZGPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZGPF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, KLKNF has a market cap of 827.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SZGPF is priced at $28.00, while KLKNF trades at $8.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.26, whereas KLKNF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, SZGPF's ROE is -0.09%, compared to KLKNF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SZGPF is more volatile compared to KLKNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZGPF.Check KLKNF's competition here

SZGPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZGPF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CUGCF has a market cap of 708M. Regarding current trading prices, SZGPF is priced at $28.00, while CUGCF trades at $0.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.26, whereas CUGCF's P/E ratio is 19.02. In terms of profitability, SZGPF's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CUGCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SZGPF is less volatile compared to CUGCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZGPF.Check CUGCF's competition here

SZGPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZGPF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, YDWAF has a market cap of 666.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SZGPF is priced at $28.00, while YDWAF trades at $4.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.26, whereas YDWAF's P/E ratio is 10.72. In terms of profitability, SZGPF's ROE is -0.09%, compared to YDWAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SZGPF is less volatile compared to YDWAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZGPF.Check YDWAF's competition here

SZGPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZGPF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FEEXY has a market cap of 454.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SZGPF is priced at $28.00, while FEEXY trades at $3.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.26, whereas FEEXY's P/E ratio is -9.09. In terms of profitability, SZGPF's ROE is -0.09%, compared to FEEXY's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SZGPF is less volatile compared to FEEXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZGPF.Check FEEXY's competition here

SZGPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZGPF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, FEEXF has a market cap of 365.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SZGPF is priced at $28.00, while FEEXF trades at $0.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.26, whereas FEEXF's P/E ratio is -6.90. In terms of profitability, SZGPF's ROE is -0.09%, compared to FEEXF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SZGPF is more volatile compared to FEEXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZGPF.Check FEEXF's competition here

SZGPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZGPF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, OSKXF has a market cap of 305.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SZGPF is priced at $28.00, while OSKXF trades at $10.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.26, whereas OSKXF's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, SZGPF's ROE is -0.09%, compared to OSKXF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SZGPF is more volatile compared to OSKXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZGPF.Check OSKXF's competition here

SZGPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZGPF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MTGRY has a market cap of 292.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SZGPF is priced at $28.00, while MTGRY trades at $2.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.26, whereas MTGRY's P/E ratio is -2.08. In terms of profitability, SZGPF's ROE is -0.09%, compared to MTGRY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SZGPF is less volatile compared to MTGRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZGPF.Check MTGRY's competition here

SZGPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZGPF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, MTGRF has a market cap of 271.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SZGPF is priced at $28.00, while MTGRF trades at $0.23.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.26, whereas MTGRF's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, SZGPF's ROE is -0.09%, compared to MTGRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SZGPF is more volatile compared to MTGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZGPF.Check MTGRF's competition here

SZGPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZGPF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, AMSIY has a market cap of 246.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SZGPF is priced at $28.00, while AMSIY trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.26, whereas AMSIY's P/E ratio is 0.47. In terms of profitability, SZGPF's ROE is -0.09%, compared to AMSIY's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SZGPF is less volatile compared to AMSIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZGPF.Check AMSIY's competition here

SZGPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZGPF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, VLPNY has a market cap of 182.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SZGPF is priced at $28.00, while VLPNY trades at $5.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.26, whereas VLPNY's P/E ratio is 25.78. In terms of profitability, SZGPF's ROE is -0.09%, compared to VLPNY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SZGPF is more volatile compared to VLPNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZGPF.Check VLPNY's competition here

SZGPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZGPF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, WEBC has a market cap of 152M. Regarding current trading prices, SZGPF is priced at $28.00, while WEBC trades at $187.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.26, whereas WEBC's P/E ratio is 5.63. In terms of profitability, SZGPF's ROE is -0.09%, compared to WEBC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SZGPF is more volatile compared to WEBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZGPF.Check WEBC's competition here

SZGPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZGPF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GRRLF has a market cap of 138.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SZGPF is priced at $28.00, while GRRLF trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.26, whereas GRRLF's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, SZGPF's ROE is -0.09%, compared to GRRLF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SZGPF is more volatile compared to GRRLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZGPF.Check GRRLF's competition here

SZGPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZGPF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ARCXF has a market cap of 64.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SZGPF is priced at $28.00, while ARCXF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.26, whereas ARCXF's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, SZGPF's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ARCXF's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, SZGPF is less volatile compared to ARCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZGPF.Check ARCXF's competition here

SZGPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZGPF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, TWIRF has a market cap of 46.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SZGPF is priced at $28.00, while TWIRF trades at $1.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.26, whereas TWIRF's P/E ratio is -15.03. In terms of profitability, SZGPF's ROE is -0.09%, compared to TWIRF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SZGPF is more volatile compared to TWIRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZGPF.Check TWIRF's competition here

SZGPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZGPF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, IRNRF has a market cap of 20.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SZGPF is priced at $28.00, while IRNRF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.26, whereas IRNRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SZGPF's ROE is -0.09%, compared to IRNRF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SZGPF is less volatile compared to IRNRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZGPF.Check IRNRF's competition here

SZGPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZGPF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, GSIH has a market cap of 9.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SZGPF is priced at $28.00, while GSIH trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.26, whereas GSIH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SZGPF's ROE is -0.09%, compared to GSIH's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SZGPF is more volatile compared to GSIH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZGPF.Check GSIH's competition here

SZGPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZGPF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, NPSTF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SZGPF is priced at $28.00, while NPSTF trades at $40.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.26, whereas NPSTF's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, SZGPF's ROE is -0.09%, compared to NPSTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SZGPF has daily volatility of 3.34 and NPSTF has daily volatility of N/A.Check NPSTF's competition here

SZGPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZGPF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, CWRN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SZGPF is priced at $28.00, while CWRN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.26, whereas CWRN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SZGPF's ROE is -0.09%, compared to CWRN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SZGPF is more volatile compared to CWRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZGPF.Check CWRN's competition here

SZGPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZGPF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, ZNGGF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SZGPF is priced at $28.00, while ZNGGF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.26, whereas ZNGGF's P/E ratio is -11.67. In terms of profitability, SZGPF's ROE is -0.09%, compared to ZNGGF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SZGPF is more volatile compared to ZNGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZGPF.Check ZNGGF's competition here

SZGPF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SZGPF stands at 1.5B. In comparison, HMTLF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SZGPF is priced at $28.00, while HMTLF trades at $14.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SZGPF currently has a P/E ratio of -3.26, whereas HMTLF's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, SZGPF's ROE is -0.09%, compared to HMTLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SZGPF is more volatile compared to HMTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SZGPF.Check HMTLF's competition here