Sanyo Special Steel Co., Ltd.
Sanyo Special Steel Co., Ltd. (SYPLF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SYPLF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Steel Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SYPLF | $15.49 | +0.26% | 1B | 30.37 | $0.51 | +322.80% |
| AMSYF | $31.63 | -6.70% | 24.3B | 20.15 | $1.57 | +1.66% |
| VLOWY | $3.89 | +0.00% | 22B | 10.42 | $0.36 | +8.73% |
| NPSCY | $6.44 | -1.68% | 20.4B | 8.65 | $0.75 | +3.69% |
| NISTF | $19.72 | -3.80% | 19.6B | 8.28 | $2.27 | +5.33% |
| SVJTY | $21.90 | +0.00% | 18.3B | 4.49 | $4.88 | +627.88% |
| TATLY | $9.25 | +0.00% | 11.5B | -185.00 | -$0.05 | +4.56% |
| HMTLY | $265.75 | +0.00% | 11.4B | 31.23 | $8.51 | N/A |
| CISXF | $14.90 | +0.00% | 11.4B | 106.43 | $0.14 | +1.54% |
| JFEEF | $11.40 | +0.00% | 7.3B | 12.26 | $0.93 | +5.95% |
Stock Comparison
SYPLF vs AMSYF Comparison August 2025
SYPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYPLF stands at 1B. In comparison, AMSYF has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SYPLF is priced at $15.49, while AMSYF trades at $31.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.37, whereas AMSYF's P/E ratio is 20.15. In terms of profitability, SYPLF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AMSYF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SYPLF is more volatile compared to AMSYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYPLF.Check AMSYF's competition here
SYPLF vs VLOWY Comparison August 2025
SYPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYPLF stands at 1B. In comparison, VLOWY has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, SYPLF is priced at $15.49, while VLOWY trades at $3.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.37, whereas VLOWY's P/E ratio is 10.42. In terms of profitability, SYPLF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VLOWY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SYPLF is more volatile compared to VLOWY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYPLF.Check VLOWY's competition here
SYPLF vs NPSCY Comparison August 2025
SYPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYPLF stands at 1B. In comparison, NPSCY has a market cap of 20.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SYPLF is priced at $15.49, while NPSCY trades at $6.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.37, whereas NPSCY's P/E ratio is 8.65. In terms of profitability, SYPLF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NPSCY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SYPLF is more volatile compared to NPSCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYPLF.Check NPSCY's competition here
SYPLF vs NISTF Comparison August 2025
SYPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYPLF stands at 1B. In comparison, NISTF has a market cap of 19.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SYPLF is priced at $15.49, while NISTF trades at $19.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.37, whereas NISTF's P/E ratio is 8.28. In terms of profitability, SYPLF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NISTF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SYPLF is more volatile compared to NISTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYPLF.Check NISTF's competition here
SYPLF vs SVJTY Comparison August 2025
SYPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYPLF stands at 1B. In comparison, SVJTY has a market cap of 18.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SYPLF is priced at $15.49, while SVJTY trades at $21.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.37, whereas SVJTY's P/E ratio is 4.49. In terms of profitability, SYPLF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SVJTY's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SYPLF is more volatile compared to SVJTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYPLF.Check SVJTY's competition here
SYPLF vs TATLY Comparison August 2025
SYPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYPLF stands at 1B. In comparison, TATLY has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SYPLF is priced at $15.49, while TATLY trades at $9.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.37, whereas TATLY's P/E ratio is -185.00. In terms of profitability, SYPLF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TATLY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SYPLF is more volatile compared to TATLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYPLF.Check TATLY's competition here
SYPLF vs HMTLY Comparison August 2025
SYPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYPLF stands at 1B. In comparison, HMTLY has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SYPLF is priced at $15.49, while HMTLY trades at $265.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.37, whereas HMTLY's P/E ratio is 31.23. In terms of profitability, SYPLF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HMTLY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SYPLF is more volatile compared to HMTLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYPLF.Check HMTLY's competition here
SYPLF vs CISXF Comparison August 2025
SYPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYPLF stands at 1B. In comparison, CISXF has a market cap of 11.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SYPLF is priced at $15.49, while CISXF trades at $14.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.37, whereas CISXF's P/E ratio is 106.43. In terms of profitability, SYPLF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CISXF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SYPLF is less volatile compared to CISXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYPLF.Check CISXF's competition here
SYPLF vs JFEEF Comparison August 2025
SYPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYPLF stands at 1B. In comparison, JFEEF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SYPLF is priced at $15.49, while JFEEF trades at $11.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.37, whereas JFEEF's P/E ratio is 12.26. In terms of profitability, SYPLF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to JFEEF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SYPLF is more volatile compared to JFEEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYPLF.Check JFEEF's competition here
SYPLF vs BLSFF Comparison August 2025
SYPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYPLF stands at 1B. In comparison, BLSFF has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SYPLF is priced at $15.49, while BLSFF trades at $16.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.37, whereas BLSFF's P/E ratio is 20.34. In terms of profitability, SYPLF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BLSFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SYPLF is more volatile compared to BLSFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYPLF.Check BLSFF's competition here
SYPLF vs BLSFY Comparison August 2025
SYPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYPLF stands at 1B. In comparison, BLSFY has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SYPLF is priced at $15.49, while BLSFY trades at $82.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.37, whereas BLSFY's P/E ratio is 19.13. In terms of profitability, SYPLF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BLSFY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SYPLF is more volatile compared to BLSFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYPLF.Check BLSFY's competition here
SYPLF vs KUMBF Comparison August 2025
SYPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYPLF stands at 1B. In comparison, KUMBF has a market cap of 6.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SYPLF is priced at $15.49, while KUMBF trades at $19.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.37, whereas KUMBF's P/E ratio is 8.12. In terms of profitability, SYPLF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KUMBF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SYPLF is more volatile compared to KUMBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYPLF.Check KUMBF's competition here
SYPLF vs SSAAF Comparison August 2025
SYPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYPLF stands at 1B. In comparison, SSAAF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SYPLF is priced at $15.49, while SSAAF trades at $6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.37, whereas SSAAF's P/E ratio is 13.62. In terms of profitability, SYPLF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SSAAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SYPLF is more volatile compared to SSAAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYPLF.Check SSAAF's competition here
SYPLF vs KIROY Comparison August 2025
SYPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYPLF stands at 1B. In comparison, KIROY has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SYPLF is priced at $15.49, while KIROY trades at $5.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.37, whereas KIROY's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, SYPLF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KIROY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SYPLF is more volatile compared to KIROY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYPLF.Check KIROY's competition here
SYPLF vs SSAAY Comparison August 2025
SYPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYPLF stands at 1B. In comparison, SSAAY has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SYPLF is priced at $15.49, while SSAAY trades at $2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.37, whereas SSAAY's P/E ratio is 12.17. In terms of profitability, SYPLF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SSAAY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SYPLF is more volatile compared to SSAAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYPLF.Check SSAAY's competition here
SYPLF vs VLOUF Comparison August 2025
SYPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYPLF stands at 1B. In comparison, VLOUF has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SYPLF is priced at $15.49, while VLOUF trades at $19.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.37, whereas VLOUF's P/E ratio is 11.02. In terms of profitability, SYPLF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VLOUF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SYPLF is more volatile compared to VLOUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYPLF.Check VLOUF's competition here
SYPLF vs KBSTF Comparison August 2025
SYPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYPLF stands at 1B. In comparison, KBSTF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SYPLF is priced at $15.49, while KBSTF trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.37, whereas KBSTF's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, SYPLF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KBSTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SYPLF is more volatile compared to KBSTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYPLF.Check KBSTF's competition here
SYPLF vs ICHBF Comparison August 2025
SYPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYPLF stands at 1B. In comparison, ICHBF has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SYPLF is priced at $15.49, while ICHBF trades at $9.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.37, whereas ICHBF's P/E ratio is 5.84. In terms of profitability, SYPLF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ICHBF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SYPLF is more volatile compared to ICHBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYPLF.Check ICHBF's competition here
SYPLF vs VLPNF Comparison August 2025
SYPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYPLF stands at 1B. In comparison, VLPNF has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SYPLF is priced at $15.49, while VLPNF trades at $21.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.37, whereas VLPNF's P/E ratio is 20.69. In terms of profitability, SYPLF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VLPNF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SYPLF is less volatile compared to VLPNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYPLF.Check VLPNF's competition here
SYPLF vs OUTKY Comparison August 2025
SYPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYPLF stands at 1B. In comparison, OUTKY has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SYPLF is priced at $15.49, while OUTKY trades at $1.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.37, whereas OUTKY's P/E ratio is -38.00. In terms of profitability, SYPLF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to OUTKY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SYPLF is more volatile compared to OUTKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYPLF.Check OUTKY's competition here
SYPLF vs YMTKF Comparison August 2025
SYPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYPLF stands at 1B. In comparison, YMTKF has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SYPLF is priced at $15.49, while YMTKF trades at $50.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.37, whereas YMTKF's P/E ratio is 14.49. In terms of profitability, SYPLF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to YMTKF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SYPLF is more volatile compared to YMTKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYPLF.Check YMTKF's competition here
SYPLF vs ANIOY Comparison August 2025
SYPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYPLF stands at 1B. In comparison, ANIOY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SYPLF is priced at $15.49, while ANIOY trades at $5.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.37, whereas ANIOY's P/E ratio is 26.68. In terms of profitability, SYPLF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ANIOY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SYPLF is more volatile compared to ANIOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYPLF.Check ANIOY's competition here
SYPLF vs STZHF Comparison August 2025
SYPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYPLF stands at 1B. In comparison, STZHF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SYPLF is priced at $15.49, while STZHF trades at $49.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.37, whereas STZHF's P/E ratio is 21.86. In terms of profitability, SYPLF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to STZHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SYPLF is more volatile compared to STZHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYPLF.Check STZHF's competition here
SYPLF vs MAANF Comparison August 2025
SYPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYPLF stands at 1B. In comparison, MAANF has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SYPLF is priced at $15.49, while MAANF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.37, whereas MAANF's P/E ratio is -2.81. In terms of profitability, SYPLF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MAANF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SYPLF is less volatile compared to MAANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYPLF.Check MAANF's competition here
SYPLF vs APMSF Comparison August 2025
SYPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYPLF stands at 1B. In comparison, APMSF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SYPLF is priced at $15.49, while APMSF trades at $30.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.37, whereas APMSF's P/E ratio is 8.62. In terms of profitability, SYPLF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to APMSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SYPLF is more volatile compared to APMSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYPLF.Check APMSF's competition here
SYPLF vs SMSMY Comparison August 2025
SYPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYPLF stands at 1B. In comparison, SMSMY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SYPLF is priced at $15.49, while SMSMY trades at $11.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.37, whereas SMSMY's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, SYPLF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SMSMY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SYPLF is more volatile compared to SMSMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYPLF.Check SMSMY's competition here
SYPLF vs APEMY Comparison August 2025
SYPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYPLF stands at 1B. In comparison, APEMY has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SYPLF is priced at $15.49, while APEMY trades at $29.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.37, whereas APEMY's P/E ratio is 7.78. In terms of profitability, SYPLF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to APEMY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SYPLF is more volatile compared to APEMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYPLF.Check APEMY's competition here
SYPLF vs ANGGF Comparison August 2025
SYPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYPLF stands at 1B. In comparison, ANGGF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SYPLF is priced at $15.49, while ANGGF trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.37, whereas ANGGF's P/E ratio is -1.89. In terms of profitability, SYPLF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ANGGF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SYPLF is more volatile compared to ANGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYPLF.Check ANGGF's competition here
SYPLF vs SMUPF Comparison August 2025
SYPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYPLF stands at 1B. In comparison, SMUPF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SYPLF is priced at $15.49, while SMUPF trades at $9.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.37, whereas SMUPF's P/E ratio is -85.27. In terms of profitability, SYPLF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SMUPF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SYPLF is less volatile compared to SMUPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYPLF.Check SMUPF's competition here
SYPLF vs EVRZF Comparison August 2025
SYPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYPLF stands at 1B. In comparison, EVRZF has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SYPLF is priced at $15.49, while EVRZF trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.37, whereas EVRZF's P/E ratio is 0.51. In terms of profitability, SYPLF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EVRZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SYPLF is more volatile compared to EVRZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYPLF.Check EVRZF's competition here
SYPLF vs MCHIF Comparison August 2025
SYPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYPLF stands at 1B. In comparison, MCHIF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SYPLF is priced at $15.49, while MCHIF trades at $21.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.37, whereas MCHIF's P/E ratio is 15.55. In terms of profitability, SYPLF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MCHIF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SYPLF is more volatile compared to MCHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYPLF.Check MCHIF's competition here
SYPLF vs SZGPF Comparison August 2025
SYPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYPLF stands at 1B. In comparison, SZGPF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SYPLF is priced at $15.49, while SZGPF trades at $28.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.37, whereas SZGPF's P/E ratio is -3.26. In terms of profitability, SYPLF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SZGPF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SYPLF is more volatile compared to SZGPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYPLF.Check SZGPF's competition here
SYPLF vs CIAFF Comparison August 2025
SYPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYPLF stands at 1B. In comparison, CIAFF has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SYPLF is priced at $15.49, while CIAFF trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.37, whereas CIAFF's P/E ratio is 13.80. In terms of profitability, SYPLF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CIAFF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SYPLF is more volatile compared to CIAFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYPLF.Check CIAFF's competition here
SYPLF vs OUTFF Comparison August 2025
SYPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYPLF stands at 1B. In comparison, OUTFF has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SYPLF is priced at $15.49, while OUTFF trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.37, whereas OUTFF's P/E ratio is -30.10. In terms of profitability, SYPLF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to OUTFF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SYPLF is more volatile compared to OUTFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYPLF.Check OUTFF's competition here
SYPLF vs SZGPY Comparison August 2025
SYPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYPLF stands at 1B. In comparison, SZGPY has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SYPLF is priced at $15.49, while SZGPY trades at $2.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.37, whereas SZGPY's P/E ratio is -3.02. In terms of profitability, SYPLF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SZGPY's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SYPLF is more volatile compared to SZGPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYPLF.Check SZGPY's competition here
SYPLF vs CKSNF Comparison August 2025
SYPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYPLF stands at 1B. In comparison, CKSNF has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SYPLF is priced at $15.49, while CKSNF trades at $5.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.37, whereas CKSNF's P/E ratio is 12.05. In terms of profitability, SYPLF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CKSNF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SYPLF is more volatile compared to CKSNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYPLF.Check CKSNF's competition here
SYPLF vs CKSNY Comparison August 2025
SYPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYPLF stands at 1B. In comparison, CKSNY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SYPLF is priced at $15.49, while CKSNY trades at $5.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.37, whereas CKSNY's P/E ratio is 11.86. In terms of profitability, SYPLF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CKSNY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SYPLF is more volatile compared to CKSNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYPLF.Check CKSNY's competition here
SYPLF vs CUGCY Comparison August 2025
SYPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYPLF stands at 1B. In comparison, CUGCY has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SYPLF is priced at $15.49, while CUGCY trades at $4.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.37, whereas CUGCY's P/E ratio is 42.82. In terms of profitability, SYPLF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CUGCY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SYPLF is more volatile compared to CUGCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYPLF.Check CUGCY's competition here
SYPLF vs LIFZF Comparison August 2025
SYPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYPLF stands at 1B. In comparison, LIFZF has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SYPLF is priced at $15.49, while LIFZF trades at $19.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.37, whereas LIFZF's P/E ratio is 12.44. In terms of profitability, SYPLF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LIFZF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SYPLF is more volatile compared to LIFZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYPLF.Check LIFZF's competition here
SYPLF vs ERELY Comparison August 2025
SYPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYPLF stands at 1B. In comparison, ERELY has a market cap of 958.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SYPLF is priced at $15.49, while ERELY trades at $7.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.37, whereas ERELY's P/E ratio is 23.77. In terms of profitability, SYPLF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ERELY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SYPLF is more volatile compared to ERELY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYPLF.Check ERELY's competition here
SYPLF vs USNZY Comparison August 2025
SYPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYPLF stands at 1B. In comparison, USNZY has a market cap of 943M. Regarding current trading prices, SYPLF is priced at $15.49, while USNZY trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.37, whereas USNZY's P/E ratio is 12.10. In terms of profitability, SYPLF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to USNZY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SYPLF is more volatile compared to USNZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYPLF.Check USNZY's competition here
SYPLF vs KLKNF Comparison August 2025
SYPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYPLF stands at 1B. In comparison, KLKNF has a market cap of 827.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SYPLF is priced at $15.49, while KLKNF trades at $8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.37, whereas KLKNF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, SYPLF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KLKNF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SYPLF is more volatile compared to KLKNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYPLF.Check KLKNF's competition here
SYPLF vs CUGCF Comparison August 2025
SYPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYPLF stands at 1B. In comparison, CUGCF has a market cap of 708M. Regarding current trading prices, SYPLF is priced at $15.49, while CUGCF trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.37, whereas CUGCF's P/E ratio is 19.02. In terms of profitability, SYPLF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CUGCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SYPLF is less volatile compared to CUGCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYPLF.Check CUGCF's competition here
SYPLF vs YDWAF Comparison August 2025
SYPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYPLF stands at 1B. In comparison, YDWAF has a market cap of 666.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SYPLF is priced at $15.49, while YDWAF trades at $4.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.37, whereas YDWAF's P/E ratio is 10.72. In terms of profitability, SYPLF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to YDWAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SYPLF is more volatile compared to YDWAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYPLF.Check YDWAF's competition here
SYPLF vs FEEXY Comparison August 2025
SYPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYPLF stands at 1B. In comparison, FEEXY has a market cap of 454.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SYPLF is priced at $15.49, while FEEXY trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.37, whereas FEEXY's P/E ratio is -9.09. In terms of profitability, SYPLF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FEEXY's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SYPLF is more volatile compared to FEEXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYPLF.Check FEEXY's competition here
SYPLF vs FEEXF Comparison August 2025
SYPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYPLF stands at 1B. In comparison, FEEXF has a market cap of 365.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SYPLF is priced at $15.49, while FEEXF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.37, whereas FEEXF's P/E ratio is -6.90. In terms of profitability, SYPLF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FEEXF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SYPLF is more volatile compared to FEEXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYPLF.Check FEEXF's competition here
SYPLF vs OSKXF Comparison August 2025
SYPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYPLF stands at 1B. In comparison, OSKXF has a market cap of 305.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SYPLF is priced at $15.49, while OSKXF trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.37, whereas OSKXF's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, SYPLF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to OSKXF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SYPLF is more volatile compared to OSKXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYPLF.Check OSKXF's competition here
SYPLF vs MTGRY Comparison August 2025
SYPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYPLF stands at 1B. In comparison, MTGRY has a market cap of 292.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SYPLF is priced at $15.49, while MTGRY trades at $2.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.37, whereas MTGRY's P/E ratio is -2.08. In terms of profitability, SYPLF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MTGRY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SYPLF is more volatile compared to MTGRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYPLF.Check MTGRY's competition here
SYPLF vs MTGRF Comparison August 2025
SYPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYPLF stands at 1B. In comparison, MTGRF has a market cap of 271.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SYPLF is priced at $15.49, while MTGRF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.37, whereas MTGRF's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, SYPLF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MTGRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SYPLF is more volatile compared to MTGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYPLF.Check MTGRF's competition here
SYPLF vs AMSIY Comparison August 2025
SYPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYPLF stands at 1B. In comparison, AMSIY has a market cap of 246.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SYPLF is priced at $15.49, while AMSIY trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.37, whereas AMSIY's P/E ratio is 0.47. In terms of profitability, SYPLF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AMSIY's ROE of -1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SYPLF is more volatile compared to AMSIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYPLF.Check AMSIY's competition here
SYPLF vs VLPNY Comparison August 2025
SYPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYPLF stands at 1B. In comparison, VLPNY has a market cap of 182.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SYPLF is priced at $15.49, while VLPNY trades at $5.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.37, whereas VLPNY's P/E ratio is 25.78. In terms of profitability, SYPLF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to VLPNY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SYPLF is more volatile compared to VLPNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYPLF.Check VLPNY's competition here
SYPLF vs WEBC Comparison August 2025
SYPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYPLF stands at 1B. In comparison, WEBC has a market cap of 152M. Regarding current trading prices, SYPLF is priced at $15.49, while WEBC trades at $187.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.37, whereas WEBC's P/E ratio is 5.63. In terms of profitability, SYPLF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WEBC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SYPLF is more volatile compared to WEBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYPLF.Check WEBC's competition here
SYPLF vs GRRLF Comparison August 2025
SYPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYPLF stands at 1B. In comparison, GRRLF has a market cap of 138.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SYPLF is priced at $15.49, while GRRLF trades at $0.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.37, whereas GRRLF's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, SYPLF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GRRLF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SYPLF is more volatile compared to GRRLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYPLF.Check GRRLF's competition here
SYPLF vs ARCXF Comparison August 2025
SYPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYPLF stands at 1B. In comparison, ARCXF has a market cap of 64.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SYPLF is priced at $15.49, while ARCXF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.37, whereas ARCXF's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, SYPLF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ARCXF's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, SYPLF is more volatile compared to ARCXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYPLF.Check ARCXF's competition here
SYPLF vs TWIRF Comparison August 2025
SYPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYPLF stands at 1B. In comparison, TWIRF has a market cap of 46.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SYPLF is priced at $15.49, while TWIRF trades at $1.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.37, whereas TWIRF's P/E ratio is -15.03. In terms of profitability, SYPLF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TWIRF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SYPLF is more volatile compared to TWIRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYPLF.Check TWIRF's competition here
SYPLF vs IRNRF Comparison August 2025
SYPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYPLF stands at 1B. In comparison, IRNRF has a market cap of 20.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SYPLF is priced at $15.49, while IRNRF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.37, whereas IRNRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SYPLF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IRNRF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SYPLF is less volatile compared to IRNRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYPLF.Check IRNRF's competition here
SYPLF vs GSIH Comparison August 2025
SYPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYPLF stands at 1B. In comparison, GSIH has a market cap of 9.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SYPLF is priced at $15.49, while GSIH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.37, whereas GSIH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SYPLF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GSIH's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SYPLF is more volatile compared to GSIH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYPLF.Check GSIH's competition here
SYPLF vs ZNGGF Comparison August 2025
SYPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYPLF stands at 1B. In comparison, ZNGGF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SYPLF is priced at $15.49, while ZNGGF trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.37, whereas ZNGGF's P/E ratio is -11.67. In terms of profitability, SYPLF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ZNGGF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SYPLF is more volatile compared to ZNGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYPLF.Check ZNGGF's competition here
SYPLF vs HMTLF Comparison August 2025
SYPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYPLF stands at 1B. In comparison, HMTLF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SYPLF is priced at $15.49, while HMTLF trades at $14.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.37, whereas HMTLF's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, SYPLF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HMTLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SYPLF is more volatile compared to HMTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYPLF.Check HMTLF's competition here
SYPLF vs NPSTF Comparison August 2025
SYPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYPLF stands at 1B. In comparison, NPSTF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SYPLF is priced at $15.49, while NPSTF trades at $40.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.37, whereas NPSTF's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, SYPLF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NPSTF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SYPLF has daily volatility of 17.54 and NPSTF has daily volatility of N/A.Check NPSTF's competition here
SYPLF vs CWRN Comparison August 2025
SYPLF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SYPLF stands at 1B. In comparison, CWRN has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SYPLF is priced at $15.49, while CWRN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SYPLF currently has a P/E ratio of 30.37, whereas CWRN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SYPLF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CWRN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SYPLF is more volatile compared to CWRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SYPLF.Check CWRN's competition here