Svenska Handelsbanken AB (publ)
Svenska Handelsbanken AB (publ) (SVNLY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SVNLY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SVNLY | $6.99 | +1.90% | 27.7B | 10.74 | $0.65 | +13.32% |
| BACRP | $194.00 | -3.00% | 1.4T | N/A | N/A | +2.17% |
| CICHY | $22.34 | +0.27% | 389.1B | 5.82 | $3.83 | +4.89% |
| IDCBF | $0.90 | +0.00% | 320.8B | 6.00 | $0.15 | +7.53% |
| IDCBY | $17.43 | -0.35% | 311.1B | 5.86 | $2.98 | +7.13% |
| HBCYF | $17.53 | +7.41% | 301.2B | 14.49 | $1.21 | +4.28% |
| CICHF | $1.15 | +5.02% | 277B | 6.06 | $0.19 | +4.74% |
| ACGBY | $19.30 | -0.26% | 270B | 6.63 | $2.91 | +6.29% |
| ACGBF | $0.75 | +0.00% | 262.5B | 6.82 | $0.11 | +7.13% |
| CBAUF | $124.08 | +0.00% | 207.5B | 27.57 | $4.50 | +2.68% |
Stock Comparison
SVNLY vs BACRP Comparison May 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, BACRP has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.99, while BACRP trades at $194.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas BACRP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BACRP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to BACRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check BACRP's competition here
SVNLY vs CICHY Comparison May 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, CICHY has a market cap of 389.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.99, while CICHY trades at $22.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas CICHY's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CICHY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to CICHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check CICHY's competition here
SVNLY vs IDCBF Comparison May 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, IDCBF has a market cap of 320.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.99, while IDCBF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas IDCBF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IDCBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to IDCBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check IDCBF's competition here
SVNLY vs IDCBY Comparison May 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, IDCBY has a market cap of 311.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.99, while IDCBY trades at $17.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas IDCBY's P/E ratio is 5.86. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IDCBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to IDCBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check IDCBY's competition here
SVNLY vs HBCYF Comparison May 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, HBCYF has a market cap of 301.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.99, while HBCYF trades at $17.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas HBCYF's P/E ratio is 14.49. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HBCYF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to HBCYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check HBCYF's competition here
SVNLY vs CICHF Comparison May 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, CICHF has a market cap of 277B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.99, while CICHF trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas CICHF's P/E ratio is 6.06. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CICHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to CICHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check CICHF's competition here
SVNLY vs ACGBY Comparison May 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, ACGBY has a market cap of 270B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.99, while ACGBY trades at $19.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas ACGBY's P/E ratio is 6.63. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ACGBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to ACGBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check ACGBY's competition here
SVNLY vs ACGBF Comparison May 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, ACGBF has a market cap of 262.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.99, while ACGBF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas ACGBF's P/E ratio is 6.82. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ACGBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to ACGBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check ACGBF's competition here
SVNLY vs CBAUF Comparison May 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, CBAUF has a market cap of 207.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.99, while CBAUF trades at $124.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas CBAUF's P/E ratio is 27.57. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CBAUF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to CBAUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check CBAUF's competition here
SVNLY vs BACHY Comparison May 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, BACHY has a market cap of 206.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.99, while BACHY trades at $16.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas BACHY's P/E ratio is 6.08. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BACHY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to BACHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check BACHY's competition here
SVNLY vs BACHF Comparison May 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, BACHF has a market cap of 201.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.99, while BACHF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas BACHF's P/E ratio is 5.69. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BACHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to BACHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check BACHF's competition here
SVNLY vs MBFJF Comparison May 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, MBFJF has a market cap of 197B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.99, while MBFJF trades at $18.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas MBFJF's P/E ratio is 16.31. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MBFJF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to MBFJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check MBFJF's competition here
SVNLY vs CMWAY Comparison May 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, CMWAY has a market cap of 193.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.99, while CMWAY trades at $116.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas CMWAY's P/E ratio is 25.74. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CMWAY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to CMWAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check CMWAY's competition here
SVNLY vs BCDRF Comparison May 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, BCDRF has a market cap of 169.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.99, while BCDRF trades at $12.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas BCDRF's P/E ratio is 11.10. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BCDRF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to BCDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check BCDRF's competition here
SVNLY vs SMFNF Comparison May 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, SMFNF has a market cap of 137.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.99, while SMFNF trades at $35.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas SMFNF's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SMFNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to SMFNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check SMFNF's competition here
SVNLY vs BBVXF Comparison May 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, BBVXF has a market cap of 125.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.99, while BBVXF trades at $22.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas BBVXF's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BBVXF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to BBVXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check BBVXF's competition here
SVNLY vs NAUBF Comparison May 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, NAUBF has a market cap of 85.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.99, while NAUBF trades at $27.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas NAUBF's P/E ratio is 19.23. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NAUBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to NAUBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check NAUBF's competition here
SVNLY vs WEBNF Comparison May 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, WEBNF has a market cap of 82.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.99, while WEBNF trades at $24.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas WEBNF's P/E ratio is 16.52. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WEBNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to WEBNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check WEBNF's competition here
SVNLY vs INGVF Comparison May 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, INGVF has a market cap of 81.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.99, while INGVF trades at $28.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas INGVF's P/E ratio is 11.06. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to INGVF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to INGVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check INGVF's competition here
SVNLY vs NABZY Comparison May 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, NABZY has a market cap of 80.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.99, while NABZY trades at $13.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas NABZY's P/E ratio is 17.96. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NABZY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to NABZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check NABZY's competition here
SVNLY vs BCLYF Comparison May 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, BCLYF has a market cap of 78.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.99, while BCLYF trades at $5.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas BCLYF's P/E ratio is 9.75. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BCLYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to BCLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check BCLYF's competition here
SVNLY vs BKFCF Comparison May 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, BKFCF has a market cap of 77.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.99, while BKFCF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas BKFCF's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BKFCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to BKFCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check BKFCF's competition here
SVNLY vs ANZGY Comparison May 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, ANZGY has a market cap of 76.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.99, while ANZGY trades at $25.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas ANZGY's P/E ratio is 17.73. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ANZGY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to ANZGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check ANZGY's competition here
SVNLY vs BCMXY Comparison May 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, BCMXY has a market cap of 74.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.99, while BCMXY trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas BCMXY's P/E ratio is 5.74. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BCMXY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to BCMXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check BCMXY's competition here
SVNLY vs RBSPF Comparison May 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, RBSPF has a market cap of 60.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.99, while RBSPF trades at $7.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas RBSPF's P/E ratio is 8.03. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RBSPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to RBSPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check RBSPF's competition here
SVNLY vs NTIOF Comparison May 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, NTIOF has a market cap of 58.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.99, while NTIOF trades at $151.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas NTIOF's P/E ratio is 19.97. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NTIOF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to NTIOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check NTIOF's competition here
SVNLY vs SCBFY Comparison May 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, SCBFY has a market cap of 58.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.99, while SCBFY trades at $52.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas SCBFY's P/E ratio is 12.74. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SCBFY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to SCBFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check SCBFY's competition here
SVNLY vs SCBFF Comparison May 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, SCBFF has a market cap of 54.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.99, while SCBFF trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas SCBFF's P/E ratio is 12.07. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SCBFF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to SCBFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check SCBFF's competition here
SVNLY vs ANEWF Comparison May 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, ANEWF has a market cap of 53.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.99, while ANEWF trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas ANEWF's P/E ratio is 18.66. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ANEWF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to ANEWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check ANEWF's competition here
SVNLY vs TDBKF Comparison May 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, TDBKF has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.99, while TDBKF trades at $17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas TDBKF's P/E ratio is 2.88. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TDBKF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to TDBKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check TDBKF's competition here
SVNLY vs AAVMY Comparison May 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, AAVMY has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.99, while AAVMY trades at $37.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas AAVMY's P/E ratio is 12.70. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AAVMY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to AAVMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check AAVMY's competition here
SVNLY vs FANDF Comparison May 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, FANDF has a market cap of 30.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.99, while FANDF trades at $5.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas FANDF's P/E ratio is 11.31. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FANDF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to FANDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check FANDF's competition here
SVNLY vs FANDY Comparison May 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, FANDY has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.99, while FANDY trades at $50.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas FANDY's P/E ratio is 10.64. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FANDY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to FANDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check FANDY's competition here
SVNLY vs SVNLF Comparison May 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, SVNLF has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.99, while SVNLF trades at $13.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas SVNLF's P/E ratio is 10.49. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SVNLF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to SVNLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check SVNLF's competition here
SVNLY vs ABMRF Comparison May 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, ABMRF has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.99, while ABMRF trades at $30.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas ABMRF's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ABMRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to ABMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check ABMRF's competition here
SVNLY vs RBCPF Comparison May 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, RBCPF has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.99, while RBCPF trades at $17.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas RBCPF's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RBCPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to RBCPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check RBCPF's competition here
SVNLY vs BNSPF Comparison May 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, BNSPF has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.99, while BNSPF trades at $18.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas BNSPF's P/E ratio is 2.94. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BNSPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to BNSPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check BNSPF's competition here
SVNLY vs BNDSY Comparison May 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, BNDSY has a market cap of 19.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.99, while BNDSY trades at $7.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas BNDSY's P/E ratio is 14.74. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BNDSY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to BNDSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check BNDSY's competition here
SVNLY vs BNDSF Comparison May 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, BNDSF has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.99, while BNDSF trades at $3.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas BNDSF's P/E ratio is 14.07. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BNDSF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to BNDSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check BNDSF's competition here
SVNLY vs WFCNP Comparison May 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, WFCNP has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.99, while WFCNP trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas WFCNP's P/E ratio is 0.68. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WFCNP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to WFCNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check WFCNP's competition here
SVNLY vs ITCFY Comparison May 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, ITCFY has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.99, while ITCFY trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas ITCFY's P/E ratio is 8.90. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ITCFY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to ITCFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check ITCFY's competition here
SVNLY vs ALORY Comparison May 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, ALORY has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.99, while ALORY trades at $14.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas ALORY's P/E ratio is 6.04. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ALORY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to ALORY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check ALORY's competition here
SVNLY vs NBKCF Comparison May 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, NBKCF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.99, while NBKCF trades at $19.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas NBKCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NBKCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to NBKCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check NBKCF's competition here
SVNLY vs IVTJF Comparison May 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, IVTJF has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.99, while IVTJF trades at $6.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas IVTJF's P/E ratio is 7.91. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IVTJF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to IVTJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check IVTJF's competition here
SVNLY vs IVTJY Comparison May 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, IVTJY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.99, while IVTJY trades at $16.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas IVTJY's P/E ratio is 9.36. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IVTJY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to IVTJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check IVTJY's competition here
SVNLY vs CSGKF Comparison May 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, CSGKF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.99, while CSGKF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas CSGKF's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CSGKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to CSGKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check CSGKF's competition here
SVNLY vs BCSO Comparison May 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, BCSO has a market cap of 80.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.99, while BCSO trades at $60.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas BCSO's P/E ratio is 9.79. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BCSO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to BCSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check BCSO's competition here
SVNLY vs ANZBY Comparison May 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, ANZBY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.99, while ANZBY trades at $16.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas ANZBY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ANZBY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to ANZBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check ANZBY's competition here
SVNLY vs TNTTF Comparison May 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, TNTTF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.99, while TNTTF trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.74, whereas TNTTF's P/E ratio is 2.42. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TNTTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to TNTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check TNTTF's competition here