Svenska Handelsbanken AB (publ)
Svenska Handelsbanken AB (publ) (SVNLY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SVNLY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SVNLY | $6.96 | +0.87% | 27.7B | 10.57 | $0.66 | +13.90% |
| BACRP | $191.01 | -11.16% | 1.4T | N/A | N/A | +2.12% |
| CICHY | $22.80 | +1.69% | 397.4B | 5.98 | $3.81 | +4.78% |
| IDCBY | $18.44 | +0.99% | 329.2B | 6.30 | $2.93 | +4.07% |
| IDCBF | $0.91 | +1.90% | 323.6B | 6.05 | $0.15 | +4.74% |
| HBCYF | $17.28 | +1.59% | 296.9B | 14.40 | $1.20 | +4.33% |
| ACGBY | $19.68 | +0.92% | 275.6B | 6.88 | $2.86 | +3.78% |
| CICHF | $1.08 | -8.47% | 260.1B | 5.69 | $0.19 | +5.05% |
| ACGBF | $0.74 | +0.00% | 259.1B | 6.73 | $0.11 | +4.65% |
| CMWAY | $124.71 | +0.68% | 208B | 27.96 | $4.45 | +2.71% |
Stock Comparison
SVNLY vs BACRP Comparison April 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, BACRP has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.96, while BACRP trades at $191.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas BACRP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BACRP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to BACRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check BACRP's competition here
SVNLY vs CICHY Comparison April 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, CICHY has a market cap of 397.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.96, while CICHY trades at $22.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas CICHY's P/E ratio is 5.98. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CICHY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to CICHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check CICHY's competition here
SVNLY vs IDCBY Comparison April 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, IDCBY has a market cap of 329.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.96, while IDCBY trades at $18.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas IDCBY's P/E ratio is 6.30. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IDCBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to IDCBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check IDCBY's competition here
SVNLY vs IDCBF Comparison April 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, IDCBF has a market cap of 323.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.96, while IDCBF trades at $0.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas IDCBF's P/E ratio is 6.05. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to IDCBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to IDCBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check IDCBF's competition here
SVNLY vs HBCYF Comparison April 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, HBCYF has a market cap of 296.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.96, while HBCYF trades at $17.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas HBCYF's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HBCYF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to HBCYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check HBCYF's competition here
SVNLY vs ACGBY Comparison April 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, ACGBY has a market cap of 275.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.96, while ACGBY trades at $19.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas ACGBY's P/E ratio is 6.88. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ACGBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to ACGBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check ACGBY's competition here
SVNLY vs CICHF Comparison April 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, CICHF has a market cap of 260.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.96, while CICHF trades at $1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas CICHF's P/E ratio is 5.69. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CICHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to CICHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check CICHF's competition here
SVNLY vs ACGBF Comparison April 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, ACGBF has a market cap of 259.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.96, while ACGBF trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas ACGBF's P/E ratio is 6.73. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ACGBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to ACGBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check ACGBF's competition here
SVNLY vs CMWAY Comparison April 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, CMWAY has a market cap of 208B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.96, while CMWAY trades at $124.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas CMWAY's P/E ratio is 27.96. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CMWAY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to CMWAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check CMWAY's competition here
SVNLY vs BACHY Comparison April 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, BACHY has a market cap of 203.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.96, while BACHY trades at $16.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas BACHY's P/E ratio is 6.06. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BACHY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to BACHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check BACHY's competition here
SVNLY vs CBAUF Comparison April 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, CBAUF has a market cap of 200.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.96, while CBAUF trades at $119.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas CBAUF's P/E ratio is 28.60. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CBAUF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to CBAUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check CBAUF's competition here
SVNLY vs MBFJF Comparison April 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, MBFJF has a market cap of 194.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.96, while MBFJF trades at $17.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas MBFJF's P/E ratio is 16.20. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MBFJF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to MBFJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check MBFJF's competition here
SVNLY vs BACHF Comparison April 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, BACHF has a market cap of 191.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.96, while BACHF trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas BACHF's P/E ratio is 5.64. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BACHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to BACHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check BACHF's competition here
SVNLY vs BCDRF Comparison April 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, BCDRF has a market cap of 179.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.96, while BCDRF trades at $12.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas BCDRF's P/E ratio is 12.46. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BCDRF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to BCDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check BCDRF's competition here
SVNLY vs SMFNF Comparison April 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, SMFNF has a market cap of 133.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.96, while SMFNF trades at $35.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas SMFNF's P/E ratio is 14.90. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SMFNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to SMFNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check SMFNF's competition here
SVNLY vs BBVXF Comparison April 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, BBVXF has a market cap of 126.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.96, while BBVXF trades at $22.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas BBVXF's P/E ratio is 10.74. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BBVXF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to BBVXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check BBVXF's competition here
SVNLY vs WEBNF Comparison April 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, WEBNF has a market cap of 95.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.96, while WEBNF trades at $27.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas WEBNF's P/E ratio is 19.55. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WEBNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to WEBNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check WEBNF's competition here
SVNLY vs NABZY Comparison April 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, NABZY has a market cap of 87.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.96, while NABZY trades at $14.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas NABZY's P/E ratio is 18.04. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NABZY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to NABZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check NABZY's competition here
SVNLY vs NAUBF Comparison April 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, NAUBF has a market cap of 85.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.96, while NAUBF trades at $27.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas NAUBF's P/E ratio is 17.65. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NAUBF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to NAUBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check NAUBF's competition here
SVNLY vs INGVF Comparison April 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, INGVF has a market cap of 81.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.96, while INGVF trades at $28.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas INGVF's P/E ratio is 11.33. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to INGVF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to INGVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check INGVF's competition here
SVNLY vs BCLYF Comparison April 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, BCLYF has a market cap of 79.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.96, while BCLYF trades at $5.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas BCLYF's P/E ratio is 10.18. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BCLYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to BCLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check BCLYF's competition here
SVNLY vs ANZGY Comparison April 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, ANZGY has a market cap of 77.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.96, while ANZGY trades at $25.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas ANZGY's P/E ratio is 18.33. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ANZGY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to ANZGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check ANZGY's competition here
SVNLY vs BKFCF Comparison April 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, BKFCF has a market cap of 77.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.96, while BKFCF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas BKFCF's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BKFCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to BKFCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check BKFCF's competition here
SVNLY vs BCMXY Comparison April 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, BCMXY has a market cap of 72.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.96, while BCMXY trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas BCMXY's P/E ratio is 5.56. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BCMXY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to BCMXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check BCMXY's competition here
SVNLY vs RBSPF Comparison April 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, RBSPF has a market cap of 63.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.96, while RBSPF trades at $7.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas RBSPF's P/E ratio is 8.69. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RBSPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to RBSPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check RBSPF's competition here
SVNLY vs NTIOF Comparison April 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, NTIOF has a market cap of 58.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.96, while NTIOF trades at $149.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas NTIOF's P/E ratio is 19.76. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NTIOF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to NTIOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check NTIOF's competition here
SVNLY vs SCBFY Comparison April 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, SCBFY has a market cap of 53.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.96, while SCBFY trades at $47.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas SCBFY's P/E ratio is 12.58. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SCBFY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to SCBFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check SCBFY's competition here
SVNLY vs ANEWF Comparison April 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, ANEWF has a market cap of 53.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.96, while ANEWF trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas ANEWF's P/E ratio is 18.66. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ANEWF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to ANEWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check ANEWF's competition here
SVNLY vs SCBFF Comparison April 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, SCBFF has a market cap of 51B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.96, while SCBFF trades at $23.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas SCBFF's P/E ratio is 12.21. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SCBFF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to SCBFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check SCBFF's competition here
SVNLY vs FANDY Comparison April 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, FANDY has a market cap of 31.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.96, while FANDY trades at $56.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas FANDY's P/E ratio is 11.69. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FANDY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to FANDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check FANDY's competition here
SVNLY vs TDBKF Comparison April 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, TDBKF has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.96, while TDBKF trades at $17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas TDBKF's P/E ratio is 2.88. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TDBKF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to TDBKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check TDBKF's competition here
SVNLY vs FANDF Comparison April 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, FANDF has a market cap of 30.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.96, while FANDF trades at $5.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas FANDF's P/E ratio is 11.42. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to FANDF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to FANDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check FANDF's competition here
SVNLY vs AAVMY Comparison April 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, AAVMY has a market cap of 29.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.96, while AAVMY trades at $35.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas AAVMY's P/E ratio is 12.22. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AAVMY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to AAVMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check AAVMY's competition here
SVNLY vs ABMRF Comparison April 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, ABMRF has a market cap of 28.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.96, while ABMRF trades at $34.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas ABMRF's P/E ratio is 11.88. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ABMRF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to ABMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check ABMRF's competition here
SVNLY vs SVNLF Comparison April 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, SVNLF has a market cap of 27.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.96, while SVNLF trades at $14.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas SVNLF's P/E ratio is 10.86. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SVNLF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to SVNLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check SVNLF's competition here
SVNLY vs RBCPF Comparison April 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, RBCPF has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.96, while RBCPF trades at $17.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas RBCPF's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to RBCPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to RBCPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check RBCPF's competition here
SVNLY vs BNSPF Comparison April 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, BNSPF has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.96, while BNSPF trades at $18.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas BNSPF's P/E ratio is 2.94. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BNSPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to BNSPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check BNSPF's competition here
SVNLY vs BNDSF Comparison April 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, BNDSF has a market cap of 20.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.96, while BNDSF trades at $4.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas BNDSF's P/E ratio is 13.97. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BNDSF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to BNDSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check BNDSF's competition here
SVNLY vs BNDSY Comparison April 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, BNDSY has a market cap of 18.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.96, while BNDSY trades at $7.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas BNDSY's P/E ratio is 12.59. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BNDSY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to BNDSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check BNDSY's competition here
SVNLY vs WFCNP Comparison April 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, WFCNP has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.96, while WFCNP trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas WFCNP's P/E ratio is 0.68. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WFCNP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to WFCNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check WFCNP's competition here
SVNLY vs ALORY Comparison April 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, ALORY has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.96, while ALORY trades at $14.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas ALORY's P/E ratio is 6.04. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ALORY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to ALORY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check ALORY's competition here
SVNLY vs NBKCF Comparison April 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, NBKCF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.96, while NBKCF trades at $19.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas NBKCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NBKCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to NBKCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check NBKCF's competition here
SVNLY vs EFGXY Comparison April 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, EFGXY has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.96, while EFGXY trades at $23.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas EFGXY's P/E ratio is 18.45. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EFGXY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to EFGXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check EFGXY's competition here
SVNLY vs EFGIF Comparison April 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, EFGIF has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.96, while EFGIF trades at $22.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas EFGIF's P/E ratio is 18.00. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to EFGIF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to EFGIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check EFGIF's competition here
SVNLY vs CSGKF Comparison April 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, CSGKF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.96, while CSGKF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas CSGKF's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to CSGKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to CSGKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check CSGKF's competition here
SVNLY vs PRRCF Comparison April 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, PRRCF has a market cap of 671.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.96, while PRRCF trades at $11.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas PRRCF's P/E ratio is 7.31. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PRRCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to PRRCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check PRRCF's competition here
SVNLY vs VUPPF Comparison April 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, VUPPF has a market cap of 613M. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.96, while VUPPF trades at $109.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas VUPPF's P/E ratio is 13.98. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to VUPPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to VUPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check VUPPF's competition here
SVNLY vs BCSO Comparison April 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, BCSO has a market cap of 80.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.96, while BCSO trades at $60.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas BCSO's P/E ratio is 9.79. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BCSO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to BCSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check BCSO's competition here
SVNLY vs TNTTF Comparison April 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, TNTTF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.96, while TNTTF trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas TNTTF's P/E ratio is 2.42. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to TNTTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to TNTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check TNTTF's competition here
SVNLY vs ANZBY Comparison April 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 27.7B. In comparison, ANZBY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.96, while ANZBY trades at $16.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 10.57, whereas ANZBY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ANZBY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to ANZBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check ANZBY's competition here