NatWest Group plc (RBSPF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RBSPF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RBSPF | $7.72 | -1.84% | 61.5B | 8.21 | $0.94 | +5.43% |
| BACRP | $185.77 | +0.00% | 1.3T | N/A | N/A | +2.08% |
| CICHY | $22.32 | +1.41% | 389.1B | 5.81 | $3.84 | +4.89% |
| IDCBY | $17.64 | +2.26% | 314.2B | 5.92 | $2.98 | +7.67% |
| IDCBF | $0.88 | +0.00% | 313.6B | 5.87 | $0.15 | +7.70% |
| HBCYF | $17.72 | -3.35% | 304.4B | 14.64 | $1.21 | +4.09% |
| CICHF | $1.12 | +8.53% | 263.5B | 5.77 | $0.19 | +4.98% |
| ACGBY | $18.51 | +0.60% | 259.3B | 6.34 | $2.92 | +7.19% |
| ACGBF | $0.74 | -3.90% | 259B | 6.17 | $0.12 | +7.23% |
| MBFJF | $20.30 | +1.00% | 229.1B | 15.26 | $1.33 | +2.78% |
Stock Comparison
RBSPF vs BACRP Comparison June 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 61.5B. In comparison, BACRP has a market cap of 1.3T. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.72, while BACRP trades at $185.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas BACRP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BACRP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to BACRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check BACRP's competition here
RBSPF vs CICHY Comparison June 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 61.5B. In comparison, CICHY has a market cap of 389.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.72, while CICHY trades at $22.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas CICHY's P/E ratio is 5.81. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CICHY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to CICHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check CICHY's competition here
RBSPF vs IDCBY Comparison June 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 61.5B. In comparison, IDCBY has a market cap of 314.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.72, while IDCBY trades at $17.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas IDCBY's P/E ratio is 5.92. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IDCBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to IDCBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check IDCBY's competition here
RBSPF vs IDCBF Comparison June 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 61.5B. In comparison, IDCBF has a market cap of 313.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.72, while IDCBF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas IDCBF's P/E ratio is 5.87. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IDCBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to IDCBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check IDCBF's competition here
RBSPF vs HBCYF Comparison June 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 61.5B. In comparison, HBCYF has a market cap of 304.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.72, while HBCYF trades at $17.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas HBCYF's P/E ratio is 14.64. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HBCYF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to HBCYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check HBCYF's competition here
RBSPF vs CICHF Comparison June 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 61.5B. In comparison, CICHF has a market cap of 263.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.72, while CICHF trades at $1.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas CICHF's P/E ratio is 5.77. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CICHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to CICHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check CICHF's competition here
RBSPF vs ACGBY Comparison June 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 61.5B. In comparison, ACGBY has a market cap of 259.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.72, while ACGBY trades at $18.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas ACGBY's P/E ratio is 6.34. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ACGBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to ACGBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check ACGBY's competition here
RBSPF vs ACGBF Comparison June 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 61.5B. In comparison, ACGBF has a market cap of 259B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.72, while ACGBF trades at $0.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas ACGBF's P/E ratio is 6.17. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ACGBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to ACGBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check ACGBF's competition here
RBSPF vs MBFJF Comparison June 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 61.5B. In comparison, MBFJF has a market cap of 229.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.72, while MBFJF trades at $20.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas MBFJF's P/E ratio is 15.26. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MBFJF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is less volatile compared to MBFJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check MBFJF's competition here
RBSPF vs BACHF Comparison June 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 61.5B. In comparison, BACHF has a market cap of 225.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.72, while BACHF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas BACHF's P/E ratio is 6.36. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BACHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to BACHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check BACHF's competition here
RBSPF vs BACHY Comparison June 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 61.5B. In comparison, BACHY has a market cap of 212.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.72, while BACHY trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas BACHY's P/E ratio is 6.23. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BACHY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to BACHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check BACHY's competition here
RBSPF vs CBAUF Comparison June 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 61.5B. In comparison, CBAUF has a market cap of 207.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.72, while CBAUF trades at $124.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas CBAUF's P/E ratio is 28.01. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CBAUF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to CBAUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check CBAUF's competition here
RBSPF vs CMWAY Comparison June 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 61.5B. In comparison, CMWAY has a market cap of 187.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.72, while CMWAY trades at $112.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas CMWAY's P/E ratio is 25.29. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CMWAY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is less volatile compared to CMWAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check CMWAY's competition here
RBSPF vs BCDRF Comparison June 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 61.5B. In comparison, BCDRF has a market cap of 184.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.72, while BCDRF trades at $12.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas BCDRF's P/E ratio is 12.23. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BCDRF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is less volatile compared to BCDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check BCDRF's competition here
RBSPF vs SMFNF Comparison June 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 61.5B. In comparison, SMFNF has a market cap of 148.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.72, while SMFNF trades at $38.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas SMFNF's P/E ratio is 15.12. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SMFNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to SMFNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check SMFNF's competition here
RBSPF vs BBVXF Comparison June 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 61.5B. In comparison, BBVXF has a market cap of 125.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.72, while BBVXF trades at $22.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas BBVXF's P/E ratio is 10.65. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BBVXF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to BBVXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check BBVXF's competition here
RBSPF vs NAUBF Comparison June 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 61.5B. In comparison, NAUBF has a market cap of 85.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.72, while NAUBF trades at $28.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas NAUBF's P/E ratio is 19.58. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NAUBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to NAUBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check NAUBF's competition here
RBSPF vs WEBNF Comparison June 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 61.5B. In comparison, WEBNF has a market cap of 85B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.72, while WEBNF trades at $24.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas WEBNF's P/E ratio is 17.17. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WEBNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to WEBNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check WEBNF's competition here
RBSPF vs INGVF Comparison June 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 61.5B. In comparison, INGVF has a market cap of 83.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.72, while INGVF trades at $29.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas INGVF's P/E ratio is 11.52. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to INGVF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to INGVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check INGVF's competition here
RBSPF vs BKFCF Comparison June 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 61.5B. In comparison, BKFCF has a market cap of 81.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.72, while BKFCF trades at $0.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas BKFCF's P/E ratio is 5.75. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BKFCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to BKFCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check BKFCF's competition here
RBSPF vs BCMXY Comparison June 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 61.5B. In comparison, BCMXY has a market cap of 80.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.72, while BCMXY trades at $23.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas BCMXY's P/E ratio is 6.17. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BCMXY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to BCMXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check BCMXY's competition here
RBSPF vs BCLYF Comparison June 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 61.5B. In comparison, BCLYF has a market cap of 80B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.72, while BCLYF trades at $5.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas BCLYF's P/E ratio is 10.19. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BCLYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is less volatile compared to BCLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check BCLYF's competition here
RBSPF vs NABZY Comparison June 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 61.5B. In comparison, NABZY has a market cap of 77.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.72, while NABZY trades at $12.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas NABZY's P/E ratio is 17.77. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NABZY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to NABZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check NABZY's competition here
RBSPF vs ANZGY Comparison June 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 61.5B. In comparison, ANZGY has a market cap of 71.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.72, while ANZGY trades at $23.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas ANZGY's P/E ratio is 16.85. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ANZGY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to ANZGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check ANZGY's competition here
RBSPF vs SCBFY Comparison June 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 61.5B. In comparison, SCBFY has a market cap of 58.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.72, while SCBFY trades at $52.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas SCBFY's P/E ratio is 12.66. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SCBFY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to SCBFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check SCBFY's competition here
RBSPF vs SCBFF Comparison June 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 61.5B. In comparison, SCBFF has a market cap of 57.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.72, while SCBFF trades at $26.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas SCBFF's P/E ratio is 12.75. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SCBFF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to SCBFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check SCBFF's competition here
RBSPF vs NTIOF Comparison June 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 61.5B. In comparison, NTIOF has a market cap of 56.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.72, while NTIOF trades at $146.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas NTIOF's P/E ratio is 18.02. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NTIOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to NTIOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check NTIOF's competition here
RBSPF vs ANEWF Comparison June 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 61.5B. In comparison, ANEWF has a market cap of 53.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.72, while ANEWF trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas ANEWF's P/E ratio is 18.66. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ANEWF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to ANEWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check ANEWF's competition here
RBSPF vs ABMRF Comparison June 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 61.5B. In comparison, ABMRF has a market cap of 33.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.72, while ABMRF trades at $40.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas ABMRF's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ABMRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to ABMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check ABMRF's competition here
RBSPF vs AAVMY Comparison June 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 61.5B. In comparison, AAVMY has a market cap of 31.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.72, while AAVMY trades at $38.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas AAVMY's P/E ratio is 12.96. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AAVMY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to AAVMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check AAVMY's competition here
RBSPF vs TDBKF Comparison June 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 61.5B. In comparison, TDBKF has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.72, while TDBKF trades at $17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas TDBKF's P/E ratio is 2.88. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TDBKF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to TDBKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check TDBKF's competition here
RBSPF vs FANDY Comparison June 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 61.5B. In comparison, FANDY has a market cap of 29.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.72, while FANDY trades at $53.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas FANDY's P/E ratio is 11.10. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FANDY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to FANDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check FANDY's competition here
RBSPF vs FANDF Comparison June 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 61.5B. In comparison, FANDF has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.72, while FANDF trades at $5.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas FANDF's P/E ratio is 10.44. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FANDF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to FANDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check FANDF's competition here
RBSPF vs SVNLY Comparison June 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 61.5B. In comparison, SVNLY has a market cap of 27.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.72, while SVNLY trades at $7.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas SVNLY's P/E ratio is 10.83. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SVNLY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to SVNLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check SVNLY's competition here
RBSPF vs SVNLF Comparison June 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 61.5B. In comparison, SVNLF has a market cap of 26.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.72, while SVNLF trades at $13.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas SVNLF's P/E ratio is 10.72. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SVNLF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to SVNLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check SVNLF's competition here
RBSPF vs RBCPF Comparison June 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 61.5B. In comparison, RBCPF has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.72, while RBCPF trades at $17.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas RBCPF's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RBCPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to RBCPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check RBCPF's competition here
RBSPF vs BNSPF Comparison June 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 61.5B. In comparison, BNSPF has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.72, while BNSPF trades at $18.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas BNSPF's P/E ratio is 2.94. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BNSPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to BNSPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check BNSPF's competition here
RBSPF vs BNDSY Comparison June 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 61.5B. In comparison, BNDSY has a market cap of 16.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.72, while BNDSY trades at $6.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas BNDSY's P/E ratio is 12.53. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BNDSY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is less volatile compared to BNDSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check BNDSY's competition here
RBSPF vs BNDSF Comparison June 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 61.5B. In comparison, BNDSF has a market cap of 16.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.72, while BNDSF trades at $3.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas BNDSF's P/E ratio is 12.26. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BNDSF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to BNDSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check BNDSF's competition here
RBSPF vs ITCFY Comparison June 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 61.5B. In comparison, ITCFY has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.72, while ITCFY trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas ITCFY's P/E ratio is 8.85. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ITCFY's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to ITCFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check ITCFY's competition here
RBSPF vs ALORY Comparison June 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 61.5B. In comparison, ALORY has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.72, while ALORY trades at $14.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas ALORY's P/E ratio is 6.04. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ALORY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to ALORY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check ALORY's competition here
RBSPF vs NBKCF Comparison June 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 61.5B. In comparison, NBKCF has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.72, while NBKCF trades at $19.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas NBKCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NBKCF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to NBKCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check NBKCF's competition here
RBSPF vs IVTJF Comparison June 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 61.5B. In comparison, IVTJF has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.72, while IVTJF trades at $6.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas IVTJF's P/E ratio is 6.89. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IVTJF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to IVTJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check IVTJF's competition here
RBSPF vs IVTJY Comparison June 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 61.5B. In comparison, IVTJY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.72, while IVTJY trades at $16.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas IVTJY's P/E ratio is 8.25. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IVTJY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to IVTJY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check IVTJY's competition here
RBSPF vs CSGKF Comparison June 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 61.5B. In comparison, CSGKF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.72, while CSGKF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas CSGKF's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CSGKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to CSGKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check CSGKF's competition here
RBSPF vs WFCNP Comparison June 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 61.5B. In comparison, WFCNP has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.72, while WFCNP trades at $0.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas WFCNP's P/E ratio is 0.10. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WFCNP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to WFCNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check WFCNP's competition here
RBSPF vs BCSO Comparison June 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 61.5B. In comparison, BCSO has a market cap of 87.7M. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.72, while BCSO trades at $65.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas BCSO's P/E ratio is 10.60. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BCSO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to BCSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check BCSO's competition here
RBSPF vs ANZBY Comparison June 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 61.5B. In comparison, ANZBY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.72, while ANZBY trades at $16.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas ANZBY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ANZBY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to ANZBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check ANZBY's competition here
RBSPF vs TNTTF Comparison June 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 61.5B. In comparison, TNTTF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.72, while TNTTF trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 8.21, whereas TNTTF's P/E ratio is 2.42. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TNTTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to TNTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check TNTTF's competition here