NatWest Group plc
NatWest Group plc (RBSPF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (RBSPF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RBSPF | $7.46 | -2.55% | 59.4B | 7.85 | $0.95 | +5.82% |
| BACRP | $200.00 | -6.98% | 1.4T | N/A | N/A | +2.22% |
| CICHY | $22.28 | -1.81% | 388.8B | 5.82 | $3.83 | +4.89% |
| IDCBF | $0.90 | +0.00% | 320.8B | 6.00 | $0.15 | +7.53% |
| IDCBY | $17.48 | -2.29% | 311.7B | 5.87 | $2.98 | +7.12% |
| HBCYF | $16.32 | -6.42% | 280.4B | 13.49 | $1.21 | +4.60% |
| ACGBY | $19.35 | -0.03% | 271.2B | 6.68 | $2.90 | +6.27% |
| CICHF | $1.10 | -5.82% | 263.3B | 5.76 | $0.19 | +5.26% |
| ACGBF | $0.75 | +0.00% | 262.5B | 6.82 | $0.11 | +7.13% |
| MBFJF | $18.48 | -2.80% | 209.4B | 17.27 | $1.07 | +2.56% |
Stock Comparison
RBSPF vs BACRP Comparison May 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.4B. In comparison, BACRP has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.46, while BACRP trades at $200.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas BACRP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BACRP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to BACRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check BACRP's competition here
RBSPF vs CICHY Comparison May 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.4B. In comparison, CICHY has a market cap of 388.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.46, while CICHY trades at $22.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas CICHY's P/E ratio is 5.82. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CICHY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to CICHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check CICHY's competition here
RBSPF vs IDCBF Comparison May 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.4B. In comparison, IDCBF has a market cap of 320.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.46, while IDCBF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas IDCBF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IDCBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to IDCBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check IDCBF's competition here
RBSPF vs IDCBY Comparison May 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.4B. In comparison, IDCBY has a market cap of 311.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.46, while IDCBY trades at $17.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas IDCBY's P/E ratio is 5.87. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IDCBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to IDCBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check IDCBY's competition here
RBSPF vs HBCYF Comparison May 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.4B. In comparison, HBCYF has a market cap of 280.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.46, while HBCYF trades at $16.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas HBCYF's P/E ratio is 13.49. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HBCYF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to HBCYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check HBCYF's competition here
RBSPF vs ACGBY Comparison May 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.4B. In comparison, ACGBY has a market cap of 271.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.46, while ACGBY trades at $19.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas ACGBY's P/E ratio is 6.68. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ACGBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to ACGBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check ACGBY's competition here
RBSPF vs CICHF Comparison May 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.4B. In comparison, CICHF has a market cap of 263.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.46, while CICHF trades at $1.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas CICHF's P/E ratio is 5.76. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CICHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is less volatile compared to CICHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check CICHF's competition here
RBSPF vs ACGBF Comparison May 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.4B. In comparison, ACGBF has a market cap of 262.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.46, while ACGBF trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas ACGBF's P/E ratio is 6.82. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ACGBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to ACGBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check ACGBF's competition here
RBSPF vs MBFJF Comparison May 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.4B. In comparison, MBFJF has a market cap of 209.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.46, while MBFJF trades at $18.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas MBFJF's P/E ratio is 17.27. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MBFJF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is less volatile compared to MBFJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check MBFJF's competition here
RBSPF vs CBAUF Comparison May 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.4B. In comparison, CBAUF has a market cap of 207.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.46, while CBAUF trades at $124.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas CBAUF's P/E ratio is 27.57. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CBAUF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to CBAUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check CBAUF's competition here
RBSPF vs BACHY Comparison May 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.4B. In comparison, BACHY has a market cap of 206.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.46, while BACHY trades at $16.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas BACHY's P/E ratio is 6.03. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BACHY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is less volatile compared to BACHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check BACHY's competition here
RBSPF vs BACHF Comparison May 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.4B. In comparison, BACHF has a market cap of 201.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.46, while BACHF trades at $0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas BACHF's P/E ratio is 5.69. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BACHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to BACHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check BACHF's competition here
RBSPF vs CMWAY Comparison May 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.4B. In comparison, CMWAY has a market cap of 190.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.46, while CMWAY trades at $114.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas CMWAY's P/E ratio is 25.29. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CMWAY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to CMWAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check CMWAY's competition here
RBSPF vs BCDRF Comparison May 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.4B. In comparison, BCDRF has a market cap of 171.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.46, while BCDRF trades at $11.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas BCDRF's P/E ratio is 11.24. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BCDRF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is less volatile compared to BCDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check BCDRF's competition here
RBSPF vs SMFNF Comparison May 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.4B. In comparison, SMFNF has a market cap of 142.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.46, while SMFNF trades at $37.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas SMFNF's P/E ratio is 14.28. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SMFNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is less volatile compared to SMFNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check SMFNF's competition here
RBSPF vs BBVXF Comparison May 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.4B. In comparison, BBVXF has a market cap of 119.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.46, while BBVXF trades at $21.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas BBVXF's P/E ratio is 9.98. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BBVXF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is less volatile compared to BBVXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check BBVXF's competition here
RBSPF vs WEBNF Comparison May 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.4B. In comparison, WEBNF has a market cap of 87.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.46, while WEBNF trades at $25.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas WEBNF's P/E ratio is 17.36. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WEBNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to WEBNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check WEBNF's competition here
RBSPF vs NAUBF Comparison May 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.4B. In comparison, NAUBF has a market cap of 85.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.46, while NAUBF trades at $27.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas NAUBF's P/E ratio is 19.23. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NAUBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to NAUBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check NAUBF's competition here
RBSPF vs INGVF Comparison May 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.4B. In comparison, INGVF has a market cap of 81.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.46, while INGVF trades at $28.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas INGVF's P/E ratio is 11.02. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to INGVF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to INGVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check INGVF's competition here
RBSPF vs BCLYF Comparison May 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.4B. In comparison, BCLYF has a market cap of 79.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.46, while BCLYF trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas BCLYF's P/E ratio is 9.90. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BCLYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is less volatile compared to BCLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check BCLYF's competition here
RBSPF vs NABZY Comparison May 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.4B. In comparison, NABZY has a market cap of 79.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.46, while NABZY trades at $12.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas NABZY's P/E ratio is 18.03. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NABZY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to NABZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check NABZY's competition here
RBSPF vs BKFCF Comparison May 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.4B. In comparison, BKFCF has a market cap of 77.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.46, while BKFCF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas BKFCF's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BKFCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to BKFCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check BKFCF's competition here
RBSPF vs ANZGY Comparison May 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.4B. In comparison, ANZGY has a market cap of 75.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.46, while ANZGY trades at $25.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas ANZGY's P/E ratio is 17.58. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ANZGY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to ANZGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check ANZGY's competition here
RBSPF vs BCMXY Comparison May 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.4B. In comparison, BCMXY has a market cap of 74.9B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.46, while BCMXY trades at $22.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas BCMXY's P/E ratio is 5.76. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BCMXY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to BCMXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check BCMXY's competition here
RBSPF vs NTIOF Comparison May 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.4B. In comparison, NTIOF has a market cap of 57.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.46, while NTIOF trades at $148.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas NTIOF's P/E ratio is 19.58. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NTIOF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to NTIOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check NTIOF's competition here
RBSPF vs SCBFY Comparison May 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.4B. In comparison, SCBFY has a market cap of 56.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.46, while SCBFY trades at $50.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas SCBFY's P/E ratio is 12.31. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SCBFY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to SCBFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check SCBFY's competition here
RBSPF vs SCBFF Comparison May 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.4B. In comparison, SCBFF has a market cap of 54.8B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.46, while SCBFF trades at $24.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas SCBFF's P/E ratio is 12.04. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SCBFF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to SCBFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check SCBFF's competition here
RBSPF vs ANEWF Comparison May 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.4B. In comparison, ANEWF has a market cap of 53.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.46, while ANEWF trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas ANEWF's P/E ratio is 18.66. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ANEWF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to ANEWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check ANEWF's competition here
RBSPF vs TDBKF Comparison May 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.4B. In comparison, TDBKF has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.46, while TDBKF trades at $17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas TDBKF's P/E ratio is 2.88. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TDBKF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to TDBKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check TDBKF's competition here
RBSPF vs AAVMY Comparison May 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.4B. In comparison, AAVMY has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.46, while AAVMY trades at $37.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas AAVMY's P/E ratio is 12.67. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AAVMY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to AAVMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check AAVMY's competition here
RBSPF vs FANDY Comparison May 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.4B. In comparison, FANDY has a market cap of 28.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.46, while FANDY trades at $50.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas FANDY's P/E ratio is 10.64. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FANDY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to FANDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check FANDY's competition here
RBSPF vs FANDF Comparison May 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.4B. In comparison, FANDF has a market cap of 28.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.46, while FANDF trades at $5.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas FANDF's P/E ratio is 10.56. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FANDF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to FANDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check FANDF's competition here
RBSPF vs ABMRF Comparison May 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.4B. In comparison, ABMRF has a market cap of 28.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.46, while ABMRF trades at $34.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas ABMRF's P/E ratio is 11.52. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ABMRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is less volatile compared to ABMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check ABMRF's competition here
RBSPF vs SVNLY Comparison May 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.4B. In comparison, SVNLY has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.46, while SVNLY trades at $6.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas SVNLY's P/E ratio is 10.39. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SVNLY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to SVNLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check SVNLY's competition here
RBSPF vs SVNLF Comparison May 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.4B. In comparison, SVNLF has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.46, while SVNLF trades at $13.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas SVNLF's P/E ratio is 10.35. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SVNLF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to SVNLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check SVNLF's competition here
RBSPF vs RBCPF Comparison May 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.4B. In comparison, RBCPF has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.46, while RBCPF trades at $17.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas RBCPF's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RBCPF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to RBCPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check RBCPF's competition here
RBSPF vs BNSPF Comparison May 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.4B. In comparison, BNSPF has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.46, while BNSPF trades at $18.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas BNSPF's P/E ratio is 2.94. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BNSPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to BNSPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check BNSPF's competition here
RBSPF vs BNDSY Comparison May 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.4B. In comparison, BNDSY has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.46, while BNDSY trades at $7.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas BNDSY's P/E ratio is 14.37. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BNDSY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to BNDSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check BNDSY's competition here
RBSPF vs BNDSF Comparison May 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.4B. In comparison, BNDSF has a market cap of 19.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.46, while BNDSF trades at $3.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas BNDSF's P/E ratio is 14.36. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BNDSF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to BNDSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check BNDSF's competition here
RBSPF vs WFCNP Comparison May 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.4B. In comparison, WFCNP has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.46, while WFCNP trades at $2.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas WFCNP's P/E ratio is 0.68. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WFCNP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is less volatile compared to WFCNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check WFCNP's competition here
RBSPF vs ITCFY Comparison May 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.4B. In comparison, ITCFY has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.46, while ITCFY trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas ITCFY's P/E ratio is 8.94. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ITCFY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to ITCFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check ITCFY's competition here
RBSPF vs ALORY Comparison May 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.4B. In comparison, ALORY has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.46, while ALORY trades at $14.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas ALORY's P/E ratio is 6.04. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ALORY's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to ALORY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check ALORY's competition here
RBSPF vs NBKCF Comparison May 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.4B. In comparison, NBKCF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.46, while NBKCF trades at $19.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas NBKCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NBKCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to NBKCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check NBKCF's competition here
RBSPF vs IVTJF Comparison May 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.4B. In comparison, IVTJF has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.46, while IVTJF trades at $8.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas IVTJF's P/E ratio is 9.76. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IVTJF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is less volatile compared to IVTJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check IVTJF's competition here
RBSPF vs IVTJY Comparison May 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.4B. In comparison, IVTJY has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.46, while IVTJY trades at $15.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas IVTJY's P/E ratio is 8.63. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IVTJY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is less volatile compared to IVTJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check IVTJY's competition here
RBSPF vs CSGKF Comparison May 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.4B. In comparison, CSGKF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.46, while CSGKF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas CSGKF's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CSGKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to CSGKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check CSGKF's competition here
RBSPF vs BCSO Comparison May 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.4B. In comparison, BCSO has a market cap of 80.9M. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.46, while BCSO trades at $60.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas BCSO's P/E ratio is 9.79. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BCSO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is less volatile compared to BCSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check BCSO's competition here
RBSPF vs ANZBY Comparison May 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.4B. In comparison, ANZBY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.46, while ANZBY trades at $16.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas ANZBY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ANZBY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to ANZBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check ANZBY's competition here
RBSPF vs TNTTF Comparison May 2026
RBSPF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, RBSPF stands at 59.4B. In comparison, TNTTF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, RBSPF is priced at $7.46, while TNTTF trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
RBSPF currently has a P/E ratio of 7.85, whereas TNTTF's P/E ratio is 2.42. In terms of profitability, RBSPF's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TNTTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, RBSPF is more volatile compared to TNTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for RBSPF.Check TNTTF's competition here