Svenska Handelsbanken AB (publ)
Svenska Handelsbanken AB (publ) (SVNLY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SVNLY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SVNLY | $7.79 | -2.01% | 30.7B | 11.62 | $0.68 | +9.53% |
| BACRP | $201.00 | +0.00% | 1.4T | N/A | N/A | +2.11% |
| CICHY | $20.43 | -1.59% | 362.9B | 5.52 | $3.77 | +4.04% |
| IDCBF | $0.84 | +0.00% | 299.4B | 6.00 | $0.14 | +5.12% |
| IDCBY | $16.34 | -1.09% | 296.7B | 5.80 | $2.87 | +3.90% |
| HBCYF | $16.99 | +0.02% | 296.4B | 18.16 | $0.95 | +3.75% |
| ACGBY | $17.19 | -1.26% | 280.6B | 6.21 | $2.83 | +3.59% |
| CICHF | $1.03 | +2.49% | 251.5B | 5.51 | $0.19 | +5.25% |
| ACGBF | $0.71 | +0.00% | 248.5B | 6.45 | $0.11 | +4.85% |
| CMWAY | $127.45 | -1.41% | 211B | 28.68 | $4.40 | +2.63% |
Stock Comparison
SVNLY vs BACRP Comparison February 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 30.7B. In comparison, BACRP has a market cap of 1.4T. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $7.79, while BACRP trades at $201.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.62, whereas BACRP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BACRP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to BACRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check BACRP's competition here
SVNLY vs CICHY Comparison February 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 30.7B. In comparison, CICHY has a market cap of 362.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $7.79, while CICHY trades at $20.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.62, whereas CICHY's P/E ratio is 5.52. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CICHY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to CICHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check CICHY's competition here
SVNLY vs IDCBF Comparison February 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 30.7B. In comparison, IDCBF has a market cap of 299.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $7.79, while IDCBF trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.62, whereas IDCBF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IDCBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to IDCBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check IDCBF's competition here
SVNLY vs IDCBY Comparison February 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 30.7B. In comparison, IDCBY has a market cap of 296.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $7.79, while IDCBY trades at $16.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.62, whereas IDCBY's P/E ratio is 5.80. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IDCBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to IDCBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check IDCBY's competition here
SVNLY vs HBCYF Comparison February 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 30.7B. In comparison, HBCYF has a market cap of 296.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $7.79, while HBCYF trades at $16.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.62, whereas HBCYF's P/E ratio is 18.16. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HBCYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to HBCYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check HBCYF's competition here
SVNLY vs ACGBY Comparison February 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 30.7B. In comparison, ACGBY has a market cap of 280.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $7.79, while ACGBY trades at $17.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.62, whereas ACGBY's P/E ratio is 6.21. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ACGBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to ACGBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check ACGBY's competition here
SVNLY vs CICHF Comparison February 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 30.7B. In comparison, CICHF has a market cap of 251.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $7.79, while CICHF trades at $1.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.62, whereas CICHF's P/E ratio is 5.51. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CICHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to CICHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check CICHF's competition here
SVNLY vs ACGBF Comparison February 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 30.7B. In comparison, ACGBF has a market cap of 248.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $7.79, while ACGBF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.62, whereas ACGBF's P/E ratio is 6.45. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ACGBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to ACGBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check ACGBF's competition here
SVNLY vs CMWAY Comparison February 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 30.7B. In comparison, CMWAY has a market cap of 211B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $7.79, while CMWAY trades at $127.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.62, whereas CMWAY's P/E ratio is 28.68. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CMWAY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to CMWAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check CMWAY's competition here
SVNLY vs MBFJF Comparison February 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 30.7B. In comparison, MBFJF has a market cap of 210.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $7.79, while MBFJF trades at $19.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.62, whereas MBFJF's P/E ratio is 16.89. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MBFJF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to MBFJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check MBFJF's competition here
SVNLY vs BCDRF Comparison February 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 30.7B. In comparison, BCDRF has a market cap of 187.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $7.79, while BCDRF trades at $12.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.62, whereas BCDRF's P/E ratio is 13.42. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BCDRF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to BCDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check BCDRF's competition here
SVNLY vs BACHY Comparison February 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 30.7B. In comparison, BACHY has a market cap of 179.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $7.79, while BACHY trades at $14.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.62, whereas BACHY's P/E ratio is 5.56. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BACHY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to BACHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check BACHY's competition here
SVNLY vs BACHF Comparison February 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 30.7B. In comparison, BACHF has a market cap of 175.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $7.79, while BACHF trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.62, whereas BACHF's P/E ratio is 5.36. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BACHF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to BACHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check BACHF's competition here
SVNLY vs CBAUF Comparison February 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 30.7B. In comparison, CBAUF has a market cap of 167.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $7.79, while CBAUF trades at $100.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.62, whereas CBAUF's P/E ratio is 23.92. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CBAUF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to CBAUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check CBAUF's competition here
SVNLY vs SMFNF Comparison February 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 30.7B. In comparison, SMFNF has a market cap of 149.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $7.79, while SMFNF trades at $40.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.62, whereas SMFNF's P/E ratio is 16.20. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SMFNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to SMFNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check SMFNF's competition here
SVNLY vs BBVXF Comparison February 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 30.7B. In comparison, BBVXF has a market cap of 132.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $7.79, while BBVXF trades at $23.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.62, whereas BBVXF's P/E ratio is 11.17. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BBVXF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to BBVXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check BBVXF's competition here
SVNLY vs NABZY Comparison February 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 30.7B. In comparison, NABZY has a market cap of 103.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $7.79, while NABZY trades at $17.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.62, whereas NABZY's P/E ratio is 21.76. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NABZY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to NABZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check NABZY's competition here
SVNLY vs WEBNF Comparison February 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 30.7B. In comparison, WEBNF has a market cap of 95.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $7.79, while WEBNF trades at $27.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.62, whereas WEBNF's P/E ratio is 19.82. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WEBNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to WEBNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check WEBNF's competition here
SVNLY vs NAUBF Comparison February 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 30.7B. In comparison, NAUBF has a market cap of 94B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $7.79, while NAUBF trades at $30.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.62, whereas NAUBF's P/E ratio is 19.97. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NAUBF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to NAUBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check NAUBF's competition here
SVNLY vs BCLYF Comparison February 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 30.7B. In comparison, BCLYF has a market cap of 87.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $7.79, while BCLYF trades at $6.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.62, whereas BCLYF's P/E ratio is 10.97. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BCLYF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to BCLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check BCLYF's competition here
SVNLY vs ANZGY Comparison February 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 30.7B. In comparison, ANZGY has a market cap of 84.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $7.79, while ANZGY trades at $28.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.62, whereas ANZGY's P/E ratio is 20.01. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ANZGY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to ANZGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check ANZGY's competition here
SVNLY vs INGVF Comparison February 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 30.7B. In comparison, INGVF has a market cap of 84.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $7.79, while INGVF trades at $29.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.62, whereas INGVF's P/E ratio is 11.67. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to INGVF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to INGVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check INGVF's competition here
SVNLY vs BKFCF Comparison February 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 30.7B. In comparison, BKFCF has a market cap of 77.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $7.79, while BKFCF trades at $0.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.62, whereas BKFCF's P/E ratio is 5.50. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BKFCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to BKFCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check BKFCF's competition here
SVNLY vs BCMXY Comparison February 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 30.7B. In comparison, BCMXY has a market cap of 67.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $7.79, while BCMXY trades at $21.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.62, whereas BCMXY's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BCMXY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to BCMXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check BCMXY's competition here
SVNLY vs RBSPF Comparison February 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 30.7B. In comparison, RBSPF has a market cap of 65.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $7.79, while RBSPF trades at $8.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.62, whereas RBSPF's P/E ratio is 8.95. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RBSPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to RBSPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check RBSPF's competition here
SVNLY vs SCBFY Comparison February 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 30.7B. In comparison, SCBFY has a market cap of 57.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $7.79, while SCBFY trades at $48.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.62, whereas SCBFY's P/E ratio is 13.16. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SCBFY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to SCBFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check SCBFY's competition here
SVNLY vs SCBFF Comparison February 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 30.7B. In comparison, SCBFF has a market cap of 54.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $7.79, while SCBFF trades at $24.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.62, whereas SCBFF's P/E ratio is 12.75. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SCBFF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to SCBFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check SCBFF's competition here
SVNLY vs ANEWF Comparison February 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 30.7B. In comparison, ANEWF has a market cap of 53.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $7.79, while ANEWF trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.62, whereas ANEWF's P/E ratio is 18.66. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ANEWF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to ANEWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check ANEWF's competition here
SVNLY vs NTIOF Comparison February 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 30.7B. In comparison, NTIOF has a market cap of 50.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $7.79, while NTIOF trades at $128.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.62, whereas NTIOF's P/E ratio is 17.57. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NTIOF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to NTIOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check NTIOF's competition here
SVNLY vs FANDY Comparison February 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 30.7B. In comparison, FANDY has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $7.79, while FANDY trades at $61.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.62, whereas FANDY's P/E ratio is 13.03. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FANDY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to FANDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check FANDY's competition here
SVNLY vs FANDF Comparison February 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 30.7B. In comparison, FANDF has a market cap of 32.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $7.79, while FANDF trades at $5.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.62, whereas FANDF's P/E ratio is 12.48. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FANDF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to FANDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check FANDF's competition here
SVNLY vs TDBKF Comparison February 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 30.7B. In comparison, TDBKF has a market cap of 31.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $7.79, while TDBKF trades at $17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.62, whereas TDBKF's P/E ratio is 2.88. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TDBKF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to TDBKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check TDBKF's competition here
SVNLY vs SVNLF Comparison February 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 30.7B. In comparison, SVNLF has a market cap of 30.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $7.79, while SVNLF trades at $15.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.62, whereas SVNLF's P/E ratio is 11.74. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SVNLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to SVNLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check SVNLF's competition here
SVNLY vs ABMRF Comparison February 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 30.7B. In comparison, ABMRF has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $7.79, while ABMRF trades at $34.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.62, whereas ABMRF's P/E ratio is 11.94. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ABMRF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to ABMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check ABMRF's competition here
SVNLY vs AAVMY Comparison February 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 30.7B. In comparison, AAVMY has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $7.79, while AAVMY trades at $33.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.62, whereas AAVMY's P/E ratio is 11.74. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AAVMY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to AAVMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check AAVMY's competition here
SVNLY vs RBCPF Comparison February 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 30.7B. In comparison, RBCPF has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $7.79, while RBCPF trades at $17.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.62, whereas RBCPF's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RBCPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to RBCPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check RBCPF's competition here
SVNLY vs BNSPF Comparison February 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 30.7B. In comparison, BNSPF has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $7.79, while BNSPF trades at $18.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.62, whereas BNSPF's P/E ratio is 2.94. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BNSPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to BNSPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check BNSPF's competition here
SVNLY vs BNDSY Comparison February 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 30.7B. In comparison, BNDSY has a market cap of 20.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $7.79, while BNDSY trades at $7.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.62, whereas BNDSY's P/E ratio is 10.72. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BNDSY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to BNDSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check BNDSY's competition here
SVNLY vs BNDSF Comparison February 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 30.7B. In comparison, BNDSF has a market cap of 18.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $7.79, while BNDSF trades at $3.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.62, whereas BNDSF's P/E ratio is 9.55. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BNDSF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to BNDSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check BNDSF's competition here
SVNLY vs EFGXY Comparison February 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 30.7B. In comparison, EFGXY has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $7.79, while EFGXY trades at $25.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.62, whereas EFGXY's P/E ratio is 17.35. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EFGXY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to EFGXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check EFGXY's competition here
SVNLY vs ALORY Comparison February 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 30.7B. In comparison, ALORY has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $7.79, while ALORY trades at $14.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.62, whereas ALORY's P/E ratio is 6.04. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ALORY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to ALORY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check ALORY's competition here
SVNLY vs EFGIF Comparison February 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 30.7B. In comparison, EFGIF has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $7.79, while EFGIF trades at $25.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.62, whereas EFGIF's P/E ratio is 16.86. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EFGIF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to EFGIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check EFGIF's competition here
SVNLY vs NBKCF Comparison February 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 30.7B. In comparison, NBKCF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $7.79, while NBKCF trades at $19.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.62, whereas NBKCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NBKCF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to NBKCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check NBKCF's competition here
SVNLY vs WFCNP Comparison February 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 30.7B. In comparison, WFCNP has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $7.79, while WFCNP trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.62, whereas WFCNP's P/E ratio is 0.52. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WFCNP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to WFCNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check WFCNP's competition here
SVNLY vs CSGKF Comparison February 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 30.7B. In comparison, CSGKF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $7.79, while CSGKF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.62, whereas CSGKF's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CSGKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to CSGKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check CSGKF's competition here
SVNLY vs PRRCF Comparison February 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 30.7B. In comparison, PRRCF has a market cap of 710.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $7.79, while PRRCF trades at $12.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.62, whereas PRRCF's P/E ratio is 7.73. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PRRCF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to PRRCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check PRRCF's competition here
SVNLY vs VUPPF Comparison February 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 30.7B. In comparison, VUPPF has a market cap of 613M. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $7.79, while VUPPF trades at $109.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.62, whereas VUPPF's P/E ratio is 13.98. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VUPPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to VUPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check VUPPF's competition here
SVNLY vs BCSO Comparison February 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 30.7B. In comparison, BCSO has a market cap of 81.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $7.79, while BCSO trades at $65.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.62, whereas BCSO's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BCSO's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to BCSO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check BCSO's competition here
SVNLY vs TNTTF Comparison February 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 30.7B. In comparison, TNTTF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $7.79, while TNTTF trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.62, whereas TNTTF's P/E ratio is 2.42. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TNTTF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to TNTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check TNTTF's competition here
SVNLY vs ANZBY Comparison February 2026
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 30.7B. In comparison, ANZBY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $7.79, while ANZBY trades at $16.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 11.62, whereas ANZBY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ANZBY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to ANZBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check ANZBY's competition here