Svenska Handelsbanken AB (publ)
Svenska Handelsbanken AB (publ) (SVNLY) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SVNLY) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Diversified Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SVNLY | $6.13 | -0.65% | 24.2B | 9.00 | $0.69 | +10.27% |
| BACRP | $225.00 | +17.18% | 424.9B | N/A | N/A | +2.14% |
| IDCBY | $15.48 | -0.51% | 352.4B | 5.73 | $2.70 | +4.24% |
| IDCBF | $0.78 | -2.14% | 349.3B | 5.54 | $0.14 | +5.53% |
| ACGBF | $0.70 | +6.06% | 301.3B | 6.89 | $0.10 | +4.90% |
| ACGBY | $16.53 | -2.07% | 293.3B | 6.39 | $2.61 | +3.82% |
| CICHY | $21.14 | -1.15% | 253.8B | 5.88 | $3.59 | +4.09% |
| BACHY | $14.77 | -1.60% | 234.2B | 5.68 | $2.61 | +4.28% |
| CICHF | $1.02 | +4.08% | 228.4B | 5.28 | $0.18 | +5.89% |
| HBCYF | $12.72 | -2.15% | 219.8B | 11.57 | $1.09 | +7.99% |
Stock Comparison
SVNLY vs BACRP Comparison July 2025
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 24.2B. In comparison, BACRP has a market cap of 424.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.13, while BACRP trades at $225.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.00, whereas BACRP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BACRP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to BACRP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check BACRP's competition here
SVNLY vs IDCBY Comparison July 2025
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 24.2B. In comparison, IDCBY has a market cap of 352.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.13, while IDCBY trades at $15.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.00, whereas IDCBY's P/E ratio is 5.73. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IDCBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to IDCBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check IDCBY's competition here
SVNLY vs IDCBF Comparison July 2025
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 24.2B. In comparison, IDCBF has a market cap of 349.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.13, while IDCBF trades at $0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.00, whereas IDCBF's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to IDCBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to IDCBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check IDCBF's competition here
SVNLY vs ACGBF Comparison July 2025
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 24.2B. In comparison, ACGBF has a market cap of 301.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.13, while ACGBF trades at $0.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.00, whereas ACGBF's P/E ratio is 6.89. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ACGBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to ACGBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check ACGBF's competition here
SVNLY vs ACGBY Comparison July 2025
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 24.2B. In comparison, ACGBY has a market cap of 293.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.13, while ACGBY trades at $16.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.00, whereas ACGBY's P/E ratio is 6.39. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ACGBY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to ACGBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check ACGBY's competition here
SVNLY vs CICHY Comparison July 2025
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 24.2B. In comparison, CICHY has a market cap of 253.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.13, while CICHY trades at $21.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.00, whereas CICHY's P/E ratio is 5.88. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CICHY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to CICHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check CICHY's competition here
SVNLY vs BACHY Comparison July 2025
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 24.2B. In comparison, BACHY has a market cap of 234.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.13, while BACHY trades at $14.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.00, whereas BACHY's P/E ratio is 5.68. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BACHY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to BACHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check BACHY's competition here
SVNLY vs CICHF Comparison July 2025
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 24.2B. In comparison, CICHF has a market cap of 228.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.13, while CICHF trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.00, whereas CICHF's P/E ratio is 5.28. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CICHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to CICHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check CICHF's competition here
SVNLY vs HBCYF Comparison July 2025
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 24.2B. In comparison, HBCYF has a market cap of 219.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.13, while HBCYF trades at $12.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.00, whereas HBCYF's P/E ratio is 11.57. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HBCYF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to HBCYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check HBCYF's competition here
SVNLY vs BACHF Comparison July 2025
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 24.2B. In comparison, BACHF has a market cap of 196.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.13, while BACHF trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.00, whereas BACHF's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BACHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to BACHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check BACHF's competition here
SVNLY vs CMWAY Comparison July 2025
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 24.2B. In comparison, CMWAY has a market cap of 190.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.13, while CMWAY trades at $112.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.00, whereas CMWAY's P/E ratio is 29.68. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CMWAY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to CMWAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check CMWAY's competition here
SVNLY vs CBAUF Comparison July 2025
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 24.2B. In comparison, CBAUF has a market cap of 189.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.13, while CBAUF trades at $113.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.00, whereas CBAUF's P/E ratio is 29.73. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CBAUF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to CBAUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check CBAUF's competition here
SVNLY vs MBFJF Comparison July 2025
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 24.2B. In comparison, MBFJF has a market cap of 169.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.13, while MBFJF trades at $15.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.00, whereas MBFJF's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to MBFJF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to MBFJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check MBFJF's competition here
SVNLY vs BCDRF Comparison July 2025
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 24.2B. In comparison, BCDRF has a market cap of 132.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.13, while BCDRF trades at $8.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.00, whereas BCDRF's P/E ratio is 9.40. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BCDRF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to BCDRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check BCDRF's competition here
SVNLY vs SMFNF Comparison July 2025
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 24.2B. In comparison, SMFNF has a market cap of 104.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.13, while SMFNF trades at $26.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.00, whereas SMFNF's P/E ratio is 13.28. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SMFNF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to SMFNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check SMFNF's competition here
SVNLY vs BKFCF Comparison July 2025
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 24.2B. In comparison, BKFCF has a market cap of 87.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.13, while BKFCF trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.00, whereas BKFCF's P/E ratio is 5.63. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BKFCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to BKFCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check BKFCF's competition here
SVNLY vs BBVXF Comparison July 2025
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 24.2B. In comparison, BBVXF has a market cap of 84.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.13, while BBVXF trades at $15.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.00, whereas BBVXF's P/E ratio is 7.04. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BBVXF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to BBVXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check BBVXF's competition here
SVNLY vs NABZY Comparison July 2025
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 24.2B. In comparison, NABZY has a market cap of 75.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.13, while NABZY trades at $12.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.00, whereas NABZY's P/E ratio is 16.92. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NABZY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to NABZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check NABZY's competition here
SVNLY vs NAUBF Comparison July 2025
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 24.2B. In comparison, NAUBF has a market cap of 75.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.13, while NAUBF trades at $24.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.00, whereas NAUBF's P/E ratio is 16.84. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NAUBF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to NAUBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check NAUBF's competition here
SVNLY vs WEBNF Comparison July 2025
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 24.2B. In comparison, WEBNF has a market cap of 72.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.13, while WEBNF trades at $21.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.00, whereas WEBNF's P/E ratio is 16.64. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WEBNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to WEBNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check WEBNF's competition here
SVNLY vs BCLYF Comparison July 2025
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 24.2B. In comparison, BCLYF has a market cap of 68.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.13, while BCLYF trades at $4.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.00, whereas BCLYF's P/E ratio is 9.70. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BCLYF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to BCLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check BCLYF's competition here
SVNLY vs INGVF Comparison July 2025
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 24.2B. In comparison, INGVF has a market cap of 64.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.13, while INGVF trades at $21.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.00, whereas INGVF's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to INGVF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to INGVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check INGVF's competition here
SVNLY vs ANZGY Comparison July 2025
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 24.2B. In comparison, ANZGY has a market cap of 59.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.13, while ANZGY trades at $19.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.00, whereas ANZGY's P/E ratio is 13.62. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ANZGY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to ANZGY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check ANZGY's competition here
SVNLY vs RBSPF Comparison July 2025
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 24.2B. In comparison, RBSPF has a market cap of 56.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.13, while RBSPF trades at $6.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.00, whereas RBSPF's P/E ratio is 9.06. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RBSPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to RBSPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check RBSPF's competition here
SVNLY vs ANEWF Comparison July 2025
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 24.2B. In comparison, ANEWF has a market cap of 53.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.13, while ANEWF trades at $17.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.00, whereas ANEWF's P/E ratio is 18.66. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ANEWF's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to ANEWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check ANEWF's competition here
SVNLY vs BCMXY Comparison July 2025
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 24.2B. In comparison, BCMXY has a market cap of 51.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.13, while BCMXY trades at $23.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.00, whereas BCMXY's P/E ratio is 5.93. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BCMXY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to BCMXY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check BCMXY's competition here
SVNLY vs SCBFY Comparison July 2025
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 24.2B. In comparison, SCBFY has a market cap of 42B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.13, while SCBFY trades at $35.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.00, whereas SCBFY's P/E ratio is 12.35. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SCBFY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to SCBFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check SCBFY's competition here
SVNLY vs SCBFF Comparison July 2025
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 24.2B. In comparison, SCBFF has a market cap of 41.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.13, while SCBFF trades at $17.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.00, whereas SCBFF's P/E ratio is 12.36. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SCBFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to SCBFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check SCBFF's competition here
SVNLY vs NBKCF Comparison July 2025
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 24.2B. In comparison, NBKCF has a market cap of 41.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.13, while NBKCF trades at $18.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.00, whereas NBKCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NBKCF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to NBKCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check NBKCF's competition here
SVNLY vs NTIOF Comparison July 2025
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 24.2B. In comparison, NTIOF has a market cap of 41.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.13, while NTIOF trades at $105.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.00, whereas NTIOF's P/E ratio is 13.76. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NTIOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to NTIOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check NTIOF's competition here
SVNLY vs TDBKF Comparison July 2025
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 24.2B. In comparison, TDBKF has a market cap of 31.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.13, while TDBKF trades at $17.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.00, whereas TDBKF's P/E ratio is 2.88. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TDBKF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to TDBKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check TDBKF's competition here
SVNLY vs WFCNP Comparison July 2025
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 24.2B. In comparison, WFCNP has a market cap of 27.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.13, while WFCNP trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.00, whereas WFCNP's P/E ratio is 0.04. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to WFCNP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to WFCNP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check WFCNP's competition here
SVNLY vs ABMRF Comparison July 2025
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 24.2B. In comparison, ABMRF has a market cap of 24.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.13, while ABMRF trades at $29.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.00, whereas ABMRF's P/E ratio is 9.54. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ABMRF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to ABMRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check ABMRF's competition here
SVNLY vs AAVMY Comparison July 2025
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 24.2B. In comparison, AAVMY has a market cap of 24.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.13, while AAVMY trades at $28.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.00, whereas AAVMY's P/E ratio is 9.50. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AAVMY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to AAVMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check AAVMY's competition here
SVNLY vs SVNLF Comparison July 2025
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 24.2B. In comparison, SVNLF has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.13, while SVNLF trades at $12.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.00, whereas SVNLF's P/E ratio is 9.10. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SVNLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to SVNLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check SVNLF's competition here
SVNLY vs RBCPF Comparison July 2025
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 24.2B. In comparison, RBCPF has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.13, while RBCPF trades at $17.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.00, whereas RBCPF's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RBCPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to RBCPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check RBCPF's competition here
SVNLY vs FANDF Comparison July 2025
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 24.2B. In comparison, FANDF has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.13, while FANDF trades at $4.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.00, whereas FANDF's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FANDF's ROE of +2.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to FANDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check FANDF's competition here
SVNLY vs BNSPF Comparison July 2025
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 24.2B. In comparison, BNSPF has a market cap of 22.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.13, while BNSPF trades at $18.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.00, whereas BNSPF's P/E ratio is 2.94. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BNSPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to BNSPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check BNSPF's competition here
SVNLY vs BNDSF Comparison July 2025
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 24.2B. In comparison, BNDSF has a market cap of 18.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.13, while BNDSF trades at $3.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.00, whereas BNDSF's P/E ratio is 8.64. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BNDSF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to BNDSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check BNDSF's competition here
SVNLY vs BNDSY Comparison July 2025
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 24.2B. In comparison, BNDSY has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.13, while BNDSY trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.00, whereas BNDSY's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BNDSY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to BNDSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check BNDSY's competition here
SVNLY vs ALORY Comparison July 2025
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 24.2B. In comparison, ALORY has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.13, while ALORY trades at $12.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.00, whereas ALORY's P/E ratio is 5.07. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ALORY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to ALORY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check ALORY's competition here
SVNLY vs EFGXY Comparison July 2025
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 24.2B. In comparison, EFGXY has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.13, while EFGXY trades at $13.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.00, whereas EFGXY's P/E ratio is 11.49. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EFGXY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to EFGXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check EFGXY's competition here
SVNLY vs EFGIF Comparison July 2025
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 24.2B. In comparison, EFGIF has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.13, while EFGIF trades at $13.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.00, whereas EFGIF's P/E ratio is 11.04. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to EFGIF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to EFGIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check EFGIF's competition here
SVNLY vs CSGKF Comparison July 2025
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 24.2B. In comparison, CSGKF has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.13, while CSGKF trades at $0.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.00, whereas CSGKF's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CSGKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to CSGKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check CSGKF's competition here
SVNLY vs FANDY Comparison July 2025
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 24.2B. In comparison, FANDY has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.13, while FANDY trades at $41.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.00, whereas FANDY's P/E ratio is 10.30. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FANDY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to FANDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check FANDY's competition here
SVNLY vs PRRCF Comparison July 2025
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 24.2B. In comparison, PRRCF has a market cap of 709.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.13, while PRRCF trades at $12.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.00, whereas PRRCF's P/E ratio is 6.92. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PRRCF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to PRRCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check PRRCF's competition here
SVNLY vs VUPPF Comparison July 2025
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 24.2B. In comparison, VUPPF has a market cap of 613M. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.13, while VUPPF trades at $109.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.00, whereas VUPPF's P/E ratio is 13.98. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VUPPF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to VUPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check VUPPF's competition here
SVNLY vs BCSO Comparison July 2025
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 24.2B. In comparison, BCSO has a market cap of 81.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.13, while BCSO trades at $60.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.00, whereas BCSO's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BCSO's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to BCSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check BCSO's competition here
SVNLY vs TNTTF Comparison July 2025
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 24.2B. In comparison, TNTTF has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.13, while TNTTF trades at $15.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.00, whereas TNTTF's P/E ratio is 2.42. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TNTTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is less volatile compared to TNTTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check TNTTF's competition here
SVNLY vs ANZBY Comparison July 2025
SVNLY plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNLY stands at 24.2B. In comparison, ANZBY has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SVNLY is priced at $6.13, while ANZBY trades at $16.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNLY currently has a P/E ratio of 9.00, whereas ANZBY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SVNLY's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ANZBY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNLY is more volatile compared to ANZBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNLY.Check ANZBY's competition here