Seven & i Holdings Co., Ltd.
Seven & i Holdings Co., Ltd. (SVNDF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SVNDF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Grocery Stores Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SVNDF | $12.78 | +0.00% | 30.4B | 21.66 | $0.59 | +2.33% |
| LBLCF | $46.39 | +2.09% | 53.9B | 30.24 | $1.52 | +0.90% |
| ADRNY | $48.12 | +3.32% | 42.6B | 16.59 | $2.88 | +2.84% |
| AHODF | $47.75 | +2.25% | 42.2B | 16.52 | $2.89 | +2.81% |
| TSCDY | $19.49 | +2.47% | 41.4B | 21.20 | $0.90 | +2.92% |
| TSCDF | $6.23 | +3.66% | 39.6B | 20.77 | $0.30 | +3.04% |
| SVNDY | $13.70 | +1.40% | 32.8B | 23.36 | $0.59 | +1.11% |
| WOLWF | $22.67 | +0.00% | 27.7B | 41.22 | $0.55 | +2.70% |
| WNGRF | $70.69 | +0.90% | 27.1B | 37.60 | $1.88 | +1.23% |
| CLEGF | $14.96 | +0.00% | 20.1B | 28.77 | $0.52 | +3.35% |
Stock Comparison
SVNDF vs LBLCF Comparison April 2026
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 30.4B. In comparison, LBLCF has a market cap of 53.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $12.78, while LBLCF trades at $46.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas LBLCF's P/E ratio is 30.24. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LBLCF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is more volatile compared to LBLCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.Check LBLCF's competition here
SVNDF vs ADRNY Comparison April 2026
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 30.4B. In comparison, ADRNY has a market cap of 42.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $12.78, while ADRNY trades at $48.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas ADRNY's P/E ratio is 16.59. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ADRNY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is more volatile compared to ADRNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.Check ADRNY's competition here
SVNDF vs AHODF Comparison April 2026
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 30.4B. In comparison, AHODF has a market cap of 42.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $12.78, while AHODF trades at $47.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas AHODF's P/E ratio is 16.52. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AHODF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is more volatile compared to AHODF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.Check AHODF's competition here
SVNDF vs TSCDY Comparison April 2026
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 30.4B. In comparison, TSCDY has a market cap of 41.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $12.78, while TSCDY trades at $19.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas TSCDY's P/E ratio is 21.20. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TSCDY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is less volatile compared to TSCDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.Check TSCDY's competition here
SVNDF vs TSCDF Comparison April 2026
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 30.4B. In comparison, TSCDF has a market cap of 39.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $12.78, while TSCDF trades at $6.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas TSCDF's P/E ratio is 20.77. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TSCDF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is less volatile compared to TSCDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.Check TSCDF's competition here
SVNDF vs SVNDY Comparison April 2026
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 30.4B. In comparison, SVNDY has a market cap of 32.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $12.78, while SVNDY trades at $13.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas SVNDY's P/E ratio is 23.36. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SVNDY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is more volatile compared to SVNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.Check SVNDY's competition here
SVNDF vs WOLWF Comparison April 2026
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 30.4B. In comparison, WOLWF has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $12.78, while WOLWF trades at $22.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas WOLWF's P/E ratio is 41.22. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WOLWF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is more volatile compared to WOLWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.Check WOLWF's competition here
SVNDF vs WNGRF Comparison April 2026
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 30.4B. In comparison, WNGRF has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $12.78, while WNGRF trades at $70.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas WNGRF's P/E ratio is 37.60. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WNGRF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is more volatile compared to WNGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.Check WNGRF's competition here
SVNDF vs CLEGF Comparison April 2026
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 30.4B. In comparison, CLEGF has a market cap of 20.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $12.78, while CLEGF trades at $14.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas CLEGF's P/E ratio is 28.77. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CLEGF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is more volatile compared to CLEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.Check CLEGF's competition here
SVNDF vs KKOYY Comparison April 2026
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 30.4B. In comparison, KKOYY has a market cap of 17.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $12.78, while KKOYY trades at $11.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas KKOYY's P/E ratio is 18.92. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KKOYY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is more volatile compared to KKOYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.Check KKOYY's competition here
SVNDF vs MTRAF Comparison April 2026
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 30.4B. In comparison, MTRAF has a market cap of 14.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $12.78, while MTRAF trades at $67.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas MTRAF's P/E ratio is 20.81. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MTRAF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is more volatile compared to MTRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.Check MTRAF's competition here
SVNDF vs CRRFY Comparison April 2026
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 30.4B. In comparison, CRRFY has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $12.78, while CRRFY trades at $3.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas CRRFY's P/E ratio is 11.30. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CRRFY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is less volatile compared to CRRFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.Check CRRFY's competition here
SVNDF vs CRERF Comparison April 2026
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 30.4B. In comparison, CRERF has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $12.78, while CRERF trades at $18.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas CRERF's P/E ratio is 11.22. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CRERF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is less volatile compared to CRERF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.Check CRERF's competition here
SVNDF vs CVPBF Comparison April 2026
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 30.4B. In comparison, CVPBF has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $12.78, while CVPBF trades at $1.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas CVPBF's P/E ratio is 15.11. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CVPBF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is more volatile compared to CVPBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.Check CVPBF's competition here
SVNDF vs CPPCY Comparison April 2026
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 30.4B. In comparison, CPPCY has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $12.78, while CPPCY trades at $13.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas CPPCY's P/E ratio is 13.79. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CPPCY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is more volatile compared to CPPCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.Check CPPCY's competition here
SVNDF vs CVPUF Comparison April 2026
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 30.4B. In comparison, CVPUF has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $12.78, while CVPUF trades at $1.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas CVPUF's P/E ratio is 13.00. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CVPUF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is more volatile compared to CVPUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.Check CVPUF's competition here
SVNDF vs JSAIY Comparison April 2026
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 30.4B. In comparison, JSAIY has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $12.78, while JSAIY trades at $18.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas JSAIY's P/E ratio is 19.08. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JSAIY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is more volatile compared to JSAIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.Check JSAIY's competition here
SVNDF vs JSNSF Comparison April 2026
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 30.4B. In comparison, JSNSF has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $12.78, while JSNSF trades at $4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas JSNSF's P/E ratio is 18.20. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JSNSF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is more volatile compared to JSNSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.Check JSNSF's competition here
SVNDF vs DNOPY Comparison April 2026
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 30.4B. In comparison, DNOPY has a market cap of 9B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $12.78, while DNOPY trades at $9.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas DNOPY's P/E ratio is 21.28. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DNOPY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is less volatile compared to DNOPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.Check DNOPY's competition here
SVNDF vs KKOYF Comparison April 2026
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 30.4B. In comparison, KKOYF has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $12.78, while KKOYF trades at $22.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas KKOYF's P/E ratio is 20.56. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KKOYF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is more volatile compared to KKOYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.Check KKOYF's competition here
SVNDF vs EMLAF Comparison April 2026
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 30.4B. In comparison, EMLAF has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $12.78, while EMLAF trades at $36.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas EMLAF's P/E ratio is 75.63. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EMLAF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is more volatile compared to EMLAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.Check EMLAF's competition here
SVNDF vs BMBRF Comparison April 2026
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 30.4B. In comparison, BMBRF has a market cap of 6.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $12.78, while BMBRF trades at $11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas BMBRF's P/E ratio is 16.91. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BMBRF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is less volatile compared to BMBRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.Check BMBRF's competition here
SVNDF vs DFILF Comparison April 2026
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 30.4B. In comparison, DFILF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $12.78, while DFILF trades at $4.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas DFILF's P/E ratio is 26.47. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DFILF's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is less volatile compared to DFILF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.Check DFILF's competition here
SVNDF vs AXFOY Comparison April 2026
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 30.4B. In comparison, AXFOY has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $12.78, while AXFOY trades at $27.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas AXFOY's P/E ratio is 26.71. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AXFOY's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is more volatile compared to AXFOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.Check AXFOY's competition here
SVNDF vs DFIHY Comparison April 2026
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 30.4B. In comparison, DFIHY has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $12.78, while DFIHY trades at $21.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas DFIHY's P/E ratio is -15.36. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DFIHY's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is less volatile compared to DFIHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.Check DFIHY's competition here
SVNDF vs GCHEF Comparison April 2026
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 30.4B. In comparison, GCHEF has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $12.78, while GCHEF trades at $6.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas GCHEF's P/E ratio is 16.30. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GCHEF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is more volatile compared to GCHEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.Check GCHEF's competition here
SVNDF vs KOBNF Comparison April 2026
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 30.4B. In comparison, KOBNF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $12.78, while KOBNF trades at $24.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas KOBNF's P/E ratio is 26.48. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KOBNF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is more volatile compared to KOBNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.Check KOBNF's competition here
SVNDF vs CUYTF Comparison April 2026
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 30.4B. In comparison, CUYTF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $12.78, while CUYTF trades at $44.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas CUYTF's P/E ratio is 14.65. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CUYTF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is more volatile compared to CUYTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.Check CUYTF's competition here
SVNDF vs AXFOF Comparison April 2026
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 30.4B. In comparison, AXFOF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $12.78, while AXFOF trades at $24.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas AXFOF's P/E ratio is 23.34. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AXFOF's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is more volatile compared to AXFOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.Check AXFOF's competition here
SVNDF vs CUYTY Comparison April 2026
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 30.4B. In comparison, CUYTY has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $12.78, while CUYTY trades at $9.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas CUYTY's P/E ratio is 13.53. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CUYTY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is more volatile compared to CUYTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.Check CUYTY's competition here
SVNDF vs SHUFF Comparison April 2026
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 30.4B. In comparison, SHUFF has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $12.78, while SHUFF trades at $12.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas SHUFF's P/E ratio is 16.04. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SHUFF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is less volatile compared to SHUFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.Check SHUFF's competition here
SVNDF vs GGGSF Comparison April 2026
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 30.4B. In comparison, GGGSF has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $12.78, while GGGSF trades at $21.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas GGGSF's P/E ratio is 13.77. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GGGSF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is more volatile compared to GGGSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.Check GGGSF's competition here
SVNDF vs OCDDY Comparison April 2026
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 30.4B. In comparison, OCDDY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $12.78, while OCDDY trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas OCDDY's P/E ratio is -3.93. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OCDDY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is more volatile compared to OCDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.Check OCDDY's competition here
SVNDF vs GGGSY Comparison April 2026
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 30.4B. In comparison, GGGSY has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $12.78, while GGGSY trades at $6.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas GGGSY's P/E ratio is 12.26. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GGGSY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is more volatile compared to GGGSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.Check GGGSY's competition here
SVNDF vs OCDGF Comparison April 2026
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 30.4B. In comparison, OCDGF has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $12.78, while OCDGF trades at $2.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas OCDGF's P/E ratio is -3.75. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OCDGF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is less volatile compared to OCDGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.Check OCDGF's competition here
SVNDF vs NNWWF Comparison April 2026
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 30.4B. In comparison, NNWWF has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $12.78, while NNWWF trades at $39.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas NNWWF's P/E ratio is 18.15. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NNWWF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is more volatile compared to NNWWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.Check NNWWF's competition here
SVNDF vs CGUSY Comparison April 2026
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 30.4B. In comparison, CGUSY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $12.78, while CGUSY trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas CGUSY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CGUSY's ROE of -33.50%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is more volatile compared to CGUSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.Check CGUSY's competition here
SVNDF vs RLEVF Comparison April 2026
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 30.4B. In comparison, RLEVF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $12.78, while RLEVF trades at $74.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas RLEVF's P/E ratio is 15.38. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RLEVF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is less volatile compared to RLEVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.Check RLEVF's competition here
SVNDF vs EUSHY Comparison April 2026
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 30.4B. In comparison, EUSHY has a market cap of 267.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $12.78, while EUSHY trades at $1.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas EUSHY's P/E ratio is -38.50. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EUSHY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is less volatile compared to EUSHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.Check EUSHY's competition here
SVNDF vs EUSHF Comparison April 2026
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 30.4B. In comparison, EUSHF has a market cap of 238M. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $12.78, while EUSHF trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas EUSHF's P/E ratio is -10.69. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EUSHF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is more volatile compared to EUSHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.Check EUSHF's competition here
SVNDF vs CGUIF Comparison April 2026
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 30.4B. In comparison, CGUIF has a market cap of 91M. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $12.78, while CGUIF trades at $0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas CGUIF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CGUIF's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is more volatile compared to CGUIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.Check CGUIF's competition here
SVNDF vs FLOCF Comparison April 2026
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 30.4B. In comparison, FLOCF has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $12.78, while FLOCF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas FLOCF's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FLOCF's ROE of +2.82%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is more volatile compared to FLOCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.Check FLOCF's competition here
SVNDF vs HCMC Comparison April 2026
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 30.4B. In comparison, HCMC has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $12.78, while HCMC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas HCMC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HCMC's ROE of +2.93%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is less volatile compared to HCMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.Check HCMC's competition here
SVNDF vs MTVX Comparison April 2026
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 30.4B. In comparison, MTVX has a market cap of 822.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $12.78, while MTVX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas MTVX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MTVX's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is less volatile compared to MTVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.Check MTVX's competition here
SVNDF vs IFMK Comparison April 2026
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 30.4B. In comparison, IFMK has a market cap of 48.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $12.78, while IFMK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas IFMK's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IFMK's ROE of +4.63%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is more volatile compared to IFMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.Check IFMK's competition here
SVNDF vs OMHI Comparison April 2026
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 30.4B. In comparison, OMHI has a market cap of 20.9K. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $12.78, while OMHI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas OMHI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OMHI's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is less volatile compared to OMHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.Check OMHI's competition here
SVNDF vs HWIN Comparison April 2026
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 30.4B. In comparison, HWIN has a market cap of 3.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $12.78, while HWIN trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas HWIN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HWIN's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is less volatile compared to HWIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.Check HWIN's competition here
SVNDF vs MFLTY Comparison April 2026
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 30.4B. In comparison, MFLTY has a market cap of 2.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $12.78, while MFLTY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas MFLTY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MFLTY's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is less volatile compared to MFLTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.Check MFLTY's competition here
SVNDF vs QKLS Comparison April 2026
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 30.4B. In comparison, QKLS has a market cap of 152. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $12.78, while QKLS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 21.66, whereas QKLS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to QKLS's ROE of -2.85%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is more volatile compared to QKLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.Check QKLS's competition here