Seven & i Holdings Co., Ltd.
Seven & i Holdings Co., Ltd. SVNDF Peers
See (SVNDF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Grocery Stores Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SVNDF | $16.04 | +0.00% | 41.6B | 34.87 | $0.46 | +1.69% |
| LBLCF | $161.92 | -2.96% | 48.1B | 30.89 | $5.22 | +0.93% |
| SVNDY | $15.91 | +0.38% | 41.6B | 34.86 | $0.46 | +1.05% |
| ADRNY | $41.77 | -0.81% | 38.1B | 18.64 | $2.24 | +3.13% |
| AHODF | $41.75 | +3.06% | 38B | 18.56 | $2.25 | +3.13% |
| TSCDY | $16.42 | -3.35% | 36B | 17.66 | $0.93 | +3.24% |
| TSCDF | $5.25 | -6.42% | 34.4B | 16.93 | $0.31 | +3.28% |
| WNGRF | $195.19 | -2.40% | 25.3B | 31.02 | $6.32 | +1.22% |
| WOLWF | $19.04 | +0.00% | 23.2B | 22.14 | $0.86 | +4.46% |
| KKOYY | $12.42 | +0.08% | 19.5B | 23.43 | $0.53 | +3.81% |
Stock Comparison
SVNDF vs LBLCF Comparison
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 41.6B. In comparison, LBLCF has a market cap of 48.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $16.04, while LBLCF trades at $161.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.87, whereas LBLCF's P/E ratio is 30.89. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to LBLCF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is more volatile compared to LBLCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.
SVNDF vs SVNDY Comparison
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 41.6B. In comparison, SVNDY has a market cap of 41.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $16.04, while SVNDY trades at $15.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.87, whereas SVNDY's P/E ratio is 34.86. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SVNDY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is more volatile compared to SVNDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.
SVNDF vs ADRNY Comparison
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 41.6B. In comparison, ADRNY has a market cap of 38.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $16.04, while ADRNY trades at $41.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.87, whereas ADRNY's P/E ratio is 18.64. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to ADRNY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is more volatile compared to ADRNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.
SVNDF vs AHODF Comparison
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 41.6B. In comparison, AHODF has a market cap of 38B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $16.04, while AHODF trades at $41.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.87, whereas AHODF's P/E ratio is 18.56. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AHODF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is more volatile compared to AHODF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.
SVNDF vs TSCDY Comparison
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 41.6B. In comparison, TSCDY has a market cap of 36B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $16.04, while TSCDY trades at $16.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.87, whereas TSCDY's P/E ratio is 17.66. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TSCDY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is more volatile compared to TSCDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.
SVNDF vs TSCDF Comparison
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 41.6B. In comparison, TSCDF has a market cap of 34.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $16.04, while TSCDF trades at $5.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.87, whereas TSCDF's P/E ratio is 16.93. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to TSCDF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is more volatile compared to TSCDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.
SVNDF vs WNGRF Comparison
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 41.6B. In comparison, WNGRF has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $16.04, while WNGRF trades at $195.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.87, whereas WNGRF's P/E ratio is 31.02. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WNGRF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is more volatile compared to WNGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.
SVNDF vs WOLWF Comparison
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 41.6B. In comparison, WOLWF has a market cap of 23.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $16.04, while WOLWF trades at $19.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.87, whereas WOLWF's P/E ratio is 22.14. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to WOLWF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is more volatile compared to WOLWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.
SVNDF vs KKOYY Comparison
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 41.6B. In comparison, KKOYY has a market cap of 19.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $16.04, while KKOYY trades at $12.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.87, whereas KKOYY's P/E ratio is 23.43. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KKOYY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is more volatile compared to KKOYY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.
SVNDF vs CLEGF Comparison
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 41.6B. In comparison, CLEGF has a market cap of 18.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $16.04, while CLEGF trades at $13.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.87, whereas CLEGF's P/E ratio is 25.53. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CLEGF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is more volatile compared to CLEGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.
SVNDF vs MTRAF Comparison
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 41.6B. In comparison, MTRAF has a market cap of 16.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $16.04, while MTRAF trades at $76.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.87, whereas MTRAF's P/E ratio is 23.54. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MTRAF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is more volatile compared to MTRAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.
SVNDF vs DNOPY Comparison
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 41.6B. In comparison, DNOPY has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $16.04, while DNOPY trades at $70.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.87, whereas DNOPY's P/E ratio is 34.04. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DNOPY's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is more volatile compared to DNOPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.
SVNDF vs CPPCY Comparison
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 41.6B. In comparison, CPPCY has a market cap of 13.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $16.04, while CPPCY trades at $15.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.87, whereas CPPCY's P/E ratio is 17.16. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CPPCY's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is more volatile compared to CPPCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.
SVNDF vs CVPBF Comparison
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 41.6B. In comparison, CVPBF has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $16.04, while CVPBF trades at $1.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.87, whereas CVPBF's P/E ratio is 16.72. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CVPBF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is less volatile compared to CVPBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.
SVNDF vs CVPUF Comparison
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 41.6B. In comparison, CVPUF has a market cap of 11.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $16.04, while CVPUF trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.87, whereas CVPUF's P/E ratio is 14.78. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CVPUF's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is less volatile compared to CVPUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.
SVNDF vs CRERF Comparison
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 41.6B. In comparison, CRERF has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $16.04, while CRERF trades at $14.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.87, whereas CRERF's P/E ratio is 11.99. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CRERF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is more volatile compared to CRERF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.
SVNDF vs CRRFY Comparison
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 41.6B. In comparison, CRRFY has a market cap of 10.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $16.04, while CRRFY trades at $2.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.87, whereas CRRFY's P/E ratio is 11.68. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CRRFY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is more volatile compared to CRRFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.
SVNDF vs EMLAF Comparison
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 41.6B. In comparison, EMLAF has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $16.04, while EMLAF trades at $40.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.87, whereas EMLAF's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EMLAF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is more volatile compared to EMLAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.
SVNDF vs JSAIY Comparison
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 41.6B. In comparison, JSAIY has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $16.04, while JSAIY trades at $15.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.87, whereas JSAIY's P/E ratio is 16.27. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to JSAIY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is more volatile compared to JSAIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.
SVNDF vs JSNSF Comparison
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 41.6B. In comparison, JSNSF has a market cap of 8.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $16.04, while JSNSF trades at $3.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.87, whereas JSNSF's P/E ratio is 14.83. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to JSNSF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is more volatile compared to JSNSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.
SVNDF vs KKOYF Comparison
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 41.6B. In comparison, KKOYF has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $16.04, while KKOYF trades at $20.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.87, whereas KKOYF's P/E ratio is 19.26. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KKOYF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is more volatile compared to KKOYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.
SVNDF vs GCHEF Comparison
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 41.6B. In comparison, GCHEF has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $16.04, while GCHEF trades at $7.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.87, whereas GCHEF's P/E ratio is 22.43. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GCHEF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is more volatile compared to GCHEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.
SVNDF vs BMBRF Comparison
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 41.6B. In comparison, BMBRF has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $16.04, while BMBRF trades at $11.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.87, whereas BMBRF's P/E ratio is 16.91. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to BMBRF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is less volatile compared to BMBRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.
SVNDF vs KOBNF Comparison
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 41.6B. In comparison, KOBNF has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $16.04, while KOBNF trades at $28.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.87, whereas KOBNF's P/E ratio is 39.80. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to KOBNF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is more volatile compared to KOBNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.
SVNDF vs AXFOY Comparison
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 41.6B. In comparison, AXFOY has a market cap of 5.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $16.04, while AXFOY trades at $27.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.87, whereas AXFOY's P/E ratio is 26.97. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AXFOY's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is more volatile compared to AXFOY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.
SVNDF vs CUYTF Comparison
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 41.6B. In comparison, CUYTF has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $16.04, while CUYTF trades at $44.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.87, whereas CUYTF's P/E ratio is 14.65. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CUYTF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is more volatile compared to CUYTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.
SVNDF vs CUYTY Comparison
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 41.6B. In comparison, CUYTY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $16.04, while CUYTY trades at $10.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.87, whereas CUYTY's P/E ratio is 13.13. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CUYTY's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is more volatile compared to CUYTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.
SVNDF vs AXFOF Comparison
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 41.6B. In comparison, AXFOF has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $16.04, while AXFOF trades at $24.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.87, whereas AXFOF's P/E ratio is 23.34. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to AXFOF's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is more volatile compared to AXFOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.
SVNDF vs DFIHY Comparison
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 41.6B. In comparison, DFIHY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $16.04, while DFIHY trades at $13.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.87, whereas DFIHY's P/E ratio is -14.67. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DFIHY's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is more volatile compared to DFIHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.
SVNDF vs DFILF Comparison
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 41.6B. In comparison, DFILF has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $16.04, while DFILF trades at $2.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.87, whereas DFILF's P/E ratio is -13.72. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to DFILF's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is less volatile compared to DFILF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.
SVNDF vs GGGSY Comparison
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 41.6B. In comparison, GGGSY has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $16.04, while GGGSY trades at $9.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.87, whereas GGGSY's P/E ratio is 13.97. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GGGSY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is more volatile compared to GGGSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.
SVNDF vs GGGSF Comparison
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 41.6B. In comparison, GGGSF has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $16.04, while GGGSF trades at $27.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.87, whereas GGGSF's P/E ratio is 13.24. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to GGGSF's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is less volatile compared to GGGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.
SVNDF vs OCDDY Comparison
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 41.6B. In comparison, OCDDY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $16.04, while OCDDY trades at $6.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.87, whereas OCDDY's P/E ratio is -5.92. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to OCDDY's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is more volatile compared to OCDDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.
SVNDF vs OCDGF Comparison
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 41.6B. In comparison, OCDGF has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $16.04, while OCDGF trades at $3.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.87, whereas OCDGF's P/E ratio is -5.62. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to OCDGF's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is more volatile compared to OCDGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.
SVNDF vs CGUSY Comparison
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 41.6B. In comparison, CGUSY has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $16.04, while CGUSY trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.87, whereas CGUSY's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CGUSY's ROE of -2.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is more volatile compared to CGUSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.
SVNDF vs SHUFF Comparison
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 41.6B. In comparison, SHUFF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $16.04, while SHUFF trades at $6.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.87, whereas SHUFF's P/E ratio is 19.24. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to SHUFF's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is more volatile compared to SHUFF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.
SVNDF vs NNWWF Comparison
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 41.6B. In comparison, NNWWF has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $16.04, while NNWWF trades at $34.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.87, whereas NNWWF's P/E ratio is 16.90. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to NNWWF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is more volatile compared to NNWWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.
SVNDF vs RLEVF Comparison
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 41.6B. In comparison, RLEVF has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $16.04, while RLEVF trades at $74.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.87, whereas RLEVF's P/E ratio is 14.74. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to RLEVF's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is less volatile compared to RLEVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.
SVNDF vs EUSHY Comparison
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 41.6B. In comparison, EUSHY has a market cap of 403.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $16.04, while EUSHY trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.87, whereas EUSHY's P/E ratio is -58.00. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EUSHY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is less volatile compared to EUSHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.
SVNDF vs EUSHF Comparison
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 41.6B. In comparison, EUSHF has a market cap of 238M. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $16.04, while EUSHF trades at $1.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.87, whereas EUSHF's P/E ratio is -10.69. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to EUSHF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is more volatile compared to EUSHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.
SVNDF vs CGUIF Comparison
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 41.6B. In comparison, CGUIF has a market cap of 200.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $16.04, while CGUIF trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.87, whereas CGUIF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to CGUIF's ROE of +0.78%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is less volatile compared to CGUIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.
SVNDF vs HWIN Comparison
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 41.6B. In comparison, HWIN has a market cap of 66.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $16.04, while HWIN trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.87, whereas HWIN's P/E ratio is -12.50. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HWIN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is less volatile compared to HWIN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.
SVNDF vs FLOCF Comparison
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 41.6B. In comparison, FLOCF has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $16.04, while FLOCF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.87, whereas FLOCF's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to FLOCF's ROE of +2.82%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is more volatile compared to FLOCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.
SVNDF vs MTVX Comparison
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 41.6B. In comparison, MTVX has a market cap of 822.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $16.04, while MTVX trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.87, whereas MTVX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MTVX's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is less volatile compared to MTVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.
SVNDF vs HCMC Comparison
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 41.6B. In comparison, HCMC has a market cap of 481.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $16.04, while HCMC trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.87, whereas HCMC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to HCMC's ROE of -753.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is less volatile compared to HCMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.
SVNDF vs IFMK Comparison
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 41.6B. In comparison, IFMK has a market cap of 9.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $16.04, while IFMK trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.87, whereas IFMK's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to IFMK's ROE of +4.63%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is more volatile compared to IFMK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.
SVNDF vs OMHI Comparison
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 41.6B. In comparison, OMHI has a market cap of 4.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $16.04, while OMHI trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.87, whereas OMHI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to OMHI's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is less volatile compared to OMHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.
SVNDF vs MFLTY Comparison
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 41.6B. In comparison, MFLTY has a market cap of 718. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $16.04, while MFLTY trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.87, whereas MFLTY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to MFLTY's ROE of +1.75%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is more volatile compared to MFLTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.
SVNDF vs QKLS Comparison
SVNDF plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SVNDF stands at 41.6B. In comparison, QKLS has a market cap of 152. Regarding current trading prices, SVNDF is priced at $16.04, while QKLS trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SVNDF currently has a P/E ratio of 34.87, whereas QKLS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SVNDF's ROE is +0.02%, compared to QKLS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SVNDF is less volatile compared to QKLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SVNDF.