Schneider Electric S.E.
Schneider Electric S.E. SU.PA Peers
See (SU.PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SU.PA | €221.35 | -0.47% | 124.2B | 28.09 | €7.88 | +1.76% |
| GNE.PA | €158.00 | -0.63% | 171.3B | 46.47 | €3.40 | +0.20% |
| SIA.BR | €136.72 | +0.56% | 108.3B | 12.25 | €11.16 | N/A |
| MAREL.AS | €4.55 | N/A | 3.4B | 227.50 | €0.02 | N/A |
| AALB.AS | €30.74 | -0.90% | 3.4B | 18.98 | €1.62 | +3.68% |
| PIC.BR | €66.00 | N/A | 1.3B | 9.48 | €6.96 | N/A |
| MTU.PA | €20.90 | -3.91% | 799.8M | 6.57 | €3.18 | +6.46% |
| JEN.BR | €54.00 | N/A | 512.2M | 12.47 | €4.33 | +1.30% |
| WAGA.PA | €17.44 | -0.46% | 431.7M | -23.57 | -€0.74 | N/A |
| NHOA.PA | €1.24 | N/A | 342.6M | 3.03 | €0.41 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SU.PA vs GNE.PA Comparison
SU.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU.PA stands at 124.2B. In comparison, GNE.PA has a market cap of 171.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SU.PA is priced at €221.35, while GNE.PA trades at €158.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas GNE.PA's P/E ratio is 46.47. In terms of profitability, SU.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to GNE.PA's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SU.PA is more volatile compared to GNE.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.PA.
SU.PA vs SIA.BR Comparison
SU.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU.PA stands at 124.2B. In comparison, SIA.BR has a market cap of 108.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SU.PA is priced at €221.35, while SIA.BR trades at €136.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas SIA.BR's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, SU.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SIA.BR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SU.PA is more volatile compared to SIA.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.PA.
SU.PA vs MAREL.AS Comparison
SU.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU.PA stands at 124.2B. In comparison, MAREL.AS has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SU.PA is priced at €221.35, while MAREL.AS trades at €4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas MAREL.AS's P/E ratio is 227.50. In terms of profitability, SU.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MAREL.AS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SU.PA is less volatile compared to MAREL.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.PA.
SU.PA vs AALB.AS Comparison
SU.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU.PA stands at 124.2B. In comparison, AALB.AS has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SU.PA is priced at €221.35, while AALB.AS trades at €30.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas AALB.AS's P/E ratio is 18.98. In terms of profitability, SU.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AALB.AS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SU.PA is more volatile compared to AALB.AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.PA.
SU.PA vs PIC.BR Comparison
SU.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU.PA stands at 124.2B. In comparison, PIC.BR has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SU.PA is priced at €221.35, while PIC.BR trades at €66.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas PIC.BR's P/E ratio is 9.48. In terms of profitability, SU.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PIC.BR's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SU.PA is less volatile compared to PIC.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.PA.
SU.PA vs MTU.PA Comparison
SU.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU.PA stands at 124.2B. In comparison, MTU.PA has a market cap of 799.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SU.PA is priced at €221.35, while MTU.PA trades at €20.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas MTU.PA's P/E ratio is 6.57. In terms of profitability, SU.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MTU.PA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SU.PA is less volatile compared to MTU.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.PA.
SU.PA vs JEN.BR Comparison
SU.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU.PA stands at 124.2B. In comparison, JEN.BR has a market cap of 512.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SU.PA is priced at €221.35, while JEN.BR trades at €54.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas JEN.BR's P/E ratio is 12.47. In terms of profitability, SU.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to JEN.BR's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SU.PA is more volatile compared to JEN.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.PA.
SU.PA vs WAGA.PA Comparison
SU.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU.PA stands at 124.2B. In comparison, WAGA.PA has a market cap of 431.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SU.PA is priced at €221.35, while WAGA.PA trades at €17.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas WAGA.PA's P/E ratio is -23.57. In terms of profitability, SU.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to WAGA.PA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SU.PA is less volatile compared to WAGA.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.PA.
SU.PA vs NHOA.PA Comparison
SU.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU.PA stands at 124.2B. In comparison, NHOA.PA has a market cap of 342.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SU.PA is priced at €221.35, while NHOA.PA trades at €1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas NHOA.PA's P/E ratio is 3.03. In terms of profitability, SU.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to NHOA.PA's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SU.PA is more volatile compared to NHOA.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.PA.
SU.PA vs SFPI.PA Comparison
SU.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU.PA stands at 124.2B. In comparison, SFPI.PA has a market cap of 218.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SU.PA is priced at €221.35, while SFPI.PA trades at €2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas SFPI.PA's P/E ratio is 47.40. In terms of profitability, SU.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to SFPI.PA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SU.PA is less volatile compared to SFPI.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.PA.
SU.PA vs ALPM.PA Comparison
SU.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU.PA stands at 124.2B. In comparison, ALPM.PA has a market cap of 155.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SU.PA is priced at €221.35, while ALPM.PA trades at €28.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas ALPM.PA's P/E ratio is 14.26. In terms of profitability, SU.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ALPM.PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SU.PA is more volatile compared to ALPM.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.PA.
SU.PA vs PREC.PA Comparison
SU.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU.PA stands at 124.2B. In comparison, PREC.PA has a market cap of 151.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SU.PA is priced at €221.35, while PREC.PA trades at €24.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas PREC.PA's P/E ratio is 23.94. In terms of profitability, SU.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to PREC.PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SU.PA is less volatile compared to PREC.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.PA.
SU.PA vs AGFB.BR Comparison
SU.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU.PA stands at 124.2B. In comparison, AGFB.BR has a market cap of 146M. Regarding current trading prices, SU.PA is priced at €221.35, while AGFB.BR trades at €0.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas AGFB.BR's P/E ratio is -1.52. In terms of profitability, SU.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to AGFB.BR's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SU.PA is more volatile compared to AGFB.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.PA.
SU.PA vs ALGEV.PA Comparison
SU.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU.PA stands at 124.2B. In comparison, ALGEV.PA has a market cap of 139.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SU.PA is priced at €221.35, while ALGEV.PA trades at €185.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas ALGEV.PA's P/E ratio is 42.14. In terms of profitability, SU.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ALGEV.PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SU.PA is more volatile compared to ALGEV.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.PA.
SU.PA vs MCPHY.PA Comparison
SU.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU.PA stands at 124.2B. In comparison, MCPHY.PA has a market cap of 65.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SU.PA is priced at €221.35, while MCPHY.PA trades at €2.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas MCPHY.PA's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, SU.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MCPHY.PA's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SU.PA is less volatile compared to MCPHY.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.PA.
SU.PA vs BALYO.PA Comparison
SU.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU.PA stands at 124.2B. In comparison, BALYO.PA has a market cap of 64.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SU.PA is priced at €221.35, while BALYO.PA trades at €0.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas BALYO.PA's P/E ratio is -7.76. In terms of profitability, SU.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to BALYO.PA's ROE of +5.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SU.PA is more volatile compared to BALYO.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.PA.
SU.PA vs MLHYD.PA Comparison
SU.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU.PA stands at 124.2B. In comparison, MLHYD.PA has a market cap of 50.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SU.PA is priced at €221.35, while MLHYD.PA trades at €730.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas MLHYD.PA's P/E ratio is -13.83. In terms of profitability, SU.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MLHYD.PA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SU.PA is less volatile compared to MLHYD.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.PA.
SU.PA vs ALNSC.PA Comparison
SU.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU.PA stands at 124.2B. In comparison, ALNSC.PA has a market cap of 31.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SU.PA is priced at €221.35, while ALNSC.PA trades at €67.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas ALNSC.PA's P/E ratio is 7.59. In terms of profitability, SU.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ALNSC.PA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SU.PA is more volatile compared to ALNSC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.PA.
SU.PA vs ALCUR.PA Comparison
SU.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU.PA stands at 124.2B. In comparison, ALCUR.PA has a market cap of 27.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SU.PA is priced at €221.35, while ALCUR.PA trades at €4.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas ALCUR.PA's P/E ratio is 19.85. In terms of profitability, SU.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ALCUR.PA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SU.PA is more volatile compared to ALCUR.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.PA.
SU.PA vs MLROU.PA Comparison
SU.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU.PA stands at 124.2B. In comparison, MLROU.PA has a market cap of 22.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SU.PA is priced at €221.35, while MLROU.PA trades at €37.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas MLROU.PA's P/E ratio is 220.00. In terms of profitability, SU.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MLROU.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SU.PA is more volatile compared to MLROU.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.PA.
SU.PA vs ALBOA.PA Comparison
SU.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU.PA stands at 124.2B. In comparison, ALBOA.PA has a market cap of 19.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SU.PA is priced at €221.35, while ALBOA.PA trades at €20.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas ALBOA.PA's P/E ratio is 95.71. In terms of profitability, SU.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ALBOA.PA's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SU.PA is more volatile compared to ALBOA.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.PA.
SU.PA vs ALENO.PA Comparison
SU.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU.PA stands at 124.2B. In comparison, ALENO.PA has a market cap of 19.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SU.PA is priced at €221.35, while ALENO.PA trades at €3.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas ALENO.PA's P/E ratio is -19.06. In terms of profitability, SU.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ALENO.PA's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SU.PA is less volatile compared to ALENO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.PA.
SU.PA vs MLETA.PA Comparison
SU.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU.PA stands at 124.2B. In comparison, MLETA.PA has a market cap of 16.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SU.PA is priced at €221.35, while MLETA.PA trades at €8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas MLETA.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SU.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MLETA.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SU.PA is more volatile compared to MLETA.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.PA.
SU.PA vs ALENE.PA Comparison
SU.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU.PA stands at 124.2B. In comparison, ALENE.PA has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SU.PA is priced at €221.35, while ALENE.PA trades at €0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas ALENE.PA's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, SU.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ALENE.PA's ROE of -13.95%. Regarding short-term risk, SU.PA is less volatile compared to ALENE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.PA.
SU.PA vs ALPCV.PA Comparison
SU.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU.PA stands at 124.2B. In comparison, ALPCV.PA has a market cap of 2.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SU.PA is priced at €221.35, while ALPCV.PA trades at €0.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas ALPCV.PA's P/E ratio is -4.28. In terms of profitability, SU.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ALPCV.PA's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SU.PA is more volatile compared to ALPCV.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.PA.
SU.PA vs ALDBT.PA Comparison
SU.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU.PA stands at 124.2B. In comparison, ALDBT.PA has a market cap of 2.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SU.PA is priced at €221.35, while ALDBT.PA trades at €0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas ALDBT.PA's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, SU.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ALDBT.PA's ROE of -0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, SU.PA is less volatile compared to ALDBT.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.PA.
SU.PA vs ALHIO.PA Comparison
SU.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU.PA stands at 124.2B. In comparison, ALHIO.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SU.PA is priced at €221.35, while ALHIO.PA trades at €4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas ALHIO.PA's P/E ratio is 8.55. In terms of profitability, SU.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to ALHIO.PA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SU.PA is more volatile compared to ALHIO.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.PA.
SU.PA vs MLVIS.PA Comparison
SU.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU.PA stands at 124.2B. In comparison, MLVIS.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SU.PA is priced at €221.35, while MLVIS.PA trades at €1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas MLVIS.PA's P/E ratio is 132.31. In terms of profitability, SU.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MLVIS.PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SU.PA is more volatile compared to MLVIS.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.PA.
SU.PA vs HAMO.BR Comparison
SU.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU.PA stands at 124.2B. In comparison, HAMO.BR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SU.PA is priced at €221.35, while HAMO.BR trades at €0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas HAMO.BR's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, SU.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to HAMO.BR's ROE of -13.54%. Regarding short-term risk, SU.PA is less volatile compared to HAMO.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.PA.
SU.PA vs MLAAT.PA Comparison
SU.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SU.PA stands at 124.2B. In comparison, MLAAT.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SU.PA is priced at €221.35, while MLAAT.PA trades at €0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 28.09, whereas MLAAT.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SU.PA's ROE is +0.15%, compared to MLAAT.PA's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SU.PA is more volatile compared to MLAAT.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SU.PA.