Hydraulique P.B SA
Hydraulique P.B SA (MLHYD.PA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MLHYD.PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MLHYD.PA | €760.00 | N/A | 53M | 1.80 | €421.72 | N/A |
| GNE.PA | €158.00 | -0.63% | 171.3B | 46.47 | €3.40 | N/A |
| SU.PA | €264.60 | N/A | 148.8B | 33.16 | €7.98 | +1.59% |
| SIA.BR | €136.72 | +0.56% | 108.3B | 12.25 | €11.16 | N/A |
| AALB.AS | €37.36 | +2.81% | 4B | 27.47 | €1.36 | +3.16% |
| MAREL.AS | €4.55 | N/A | 3.4B | 227.50 | €0.02 | N/A |
| PIC.BR | €66.00 | N/A | 1.3B | 9.48 | €6.96 | +0.30% |
| MTU.PA | €20.55 | -0.24% | 786.4M | 11.48 | €1.79 | +6.07% |
| JEN.BR | €77.00 | +6.94% | 709.1M | 12.28 | €6.27 | +1.39% |
| WAGA.PA | €22.70 | +1.34% | 607M | -16.81 | -€1.35 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MLHYD.PA vs GNE.PA Comparison May 2026
MLHYD.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLHYD.PA stands at 53M. In comparison, GNE.PA has a market cap of 171.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MLHYD.PA is priced at €760.00, while GNE.PA trades at €158.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLHYD.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.80, whereas GNE.PA's P/E ratio is 46.47. In terms of profitability, MLHYD.PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to GNE.PA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHYD.PA is less volatile compared to GNE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHYD.PA.Check GNE.PA's competition here
MLHYD.PA vs SU.PA Comparison May 2026
MLHYD.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLHYD.PA stands at 53M. In comparison, SU.PA has a market cap of 148.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MLHYD.PA is priced at €760.00, while SU.PA trades at €264.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLHYD.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.80, whereas SU.PA's P/E ratio is 33.16. In terms of profitability, MLHYD.PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SU.PA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHYD.PA is less volatile compared to SU.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHYD.PA.Check SU.PA's competition here
MLHYD.PA vs SIA.BR Comparison May 2026
MLHYD.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLHYD.PA stands at 53M. In comparison, SIA.BR has a market cap of 108.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MLHYD.PA is priced at €760.00, while SIA.BR trades at €136.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLHYD.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.80, whereas SIA.BR's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, MLHYD.PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SIA.BR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHYD.PA is less volatile compared to SIA.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHYD.PA.Check SIA.BR's competition here
MLHYD.PA vs AALB.AS Comparison May 2026
MLHYD.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLHYD.PA stands at 53M. In comparison, AALB.AS has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, MLHYD.PA is priced at €760.00, while AALB.AS trades at €37.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLHYD.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.80, whereas AALB.AS's P/E ratio is 27.47. In terms of profitability, MLHYD.PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AALB.AS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHYD.PA is less volatile compared to AALB.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHYD.PA.Check AALB.AS's competition here
MLHYD.PA vs MAREL.AS Comparison May 2026
MLHYD.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLHYD.PA stands at 53M. In comparison, MAREL.AS has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MLHYD.PA is priced at €760.00, while MAREL.AS trades at €4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLHYD.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.80, whereas MAREL.AS's P/E ratio is 227.50. In terms of profitability, MLHYD.PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MAREL.AS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHYD.PA is less volatile compared to MAREL.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHYD.PA.Check MAREL.AS's competition here
MLHYD.PA vs PIC.BR Comparison May 2026
MLHYD.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLHYD.PA stands at 53M. In comparison, PIC.BR has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MLHYD.PA is priced at €760.00, while PIC.BR trades at €66.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLHYD.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.80, whereas PIC.BR's P/E ratio is 9.48. In terms of profitability, MLHYD.PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PIC.BR's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHYD.PA is less volatile compared to PIC.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHYD.PA.Check PIC.BR's competition here
MLHYD.PA vs MTU.PA Comparison May 2026
MLHYD.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLHYD.PA stands at 53M. In comparison, MTU.PA has a market cap of 786.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MLHYD.PA is priced at €760.00, while MTU.PA trades at €20.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLHYD.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.80, whereas MTU.PA's P/E ratio is 11.48. In terms of profitability, MLHYD.PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MTU.PA's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHYD.PA is less volatile compared to MTU.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHYD.PA.Check MTU.PA's competition here
MLHYD.PA vs JEN.BR Comparison May 2026
MLHYD.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLHYD.PA stands at 53M. In comparison, JEN.BR has a market cap of 709.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MLHYD.PA is priced at €760.00, while JEN.BR trades at €77.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLHYD.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.80, whereas JEN.BR's P/E ratio is 12.28. In terms of profitability, MLHYD.PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to JEN.BR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHYD.PA is less volatile compared to JEN.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHYD.PA.Check JEN.BR's competition here
MLHYD.PA vs WAGA.PA Comparison May 2026
MLHYD.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLHYD.PA stands at 53M. In comparison, WAGA.PA has a market cap of 607M. Regarding current trading prices, MLHYD.PA is priced at €760.00, while WAGA.PA trades at €22.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLHYD.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.80, whereas WAGA.PA's P/E ratio is -16.81. In terms of profitability, MLHYD.PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to WAGA.PA's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHYD.PA is less volatile compared to WAGA.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHYD.PA.Check WAGA.PA's competition here
MLHYD.PA vs NHOA.PA Comparison May 2026
MLHYD.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLHYD.PA stands at 53M. In comparison, NHOA.PA has a market cap of 342.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MLHYD.PA is priced at €760.00, while NHOA.PA trades at €1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLHYD.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.80, whereas NHOA.PA's P/E ratio is 3.03. In terms of profitability, MLHYD.PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to NHOA.PA's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHYD.PA and NHOA.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check NHOA.PA's competition here
MLHYD.PA vs SFPI.PA Comparison May 2026
MLHYD.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLHYD.PA stands at 53M. In comparison, SFPI.PA has a market cap of 182.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MLHYD.PA is priced at €760.00, while SFPI.PA trades at €1.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLHYD.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.80, whereas SFPI.PA's P/E ratio is 11.00. In terms of profitability, MLHYD.PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to SFPI.PA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHYD.PA is less volatile compared to SFPI.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHYD.PA.Check SFPI.PA's competition here
MLHYD.PA vs PREC.PA Comparison May 2026
MLHYD.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLHYD.PA stands at 53M. In comparison, PREC.PA has a market cap of 151.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MLHYD.PA is priced at €760.00, while PREC.PA trades at €24.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLHYD.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.80, whereas PREC.PA's P/E ratio is 23.94. In terms of profitability, MLHYD.PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PREC.PA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHYD.PA is less volatile compared to PREC.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHYD.PA.Check PREC.PA's competition here
MLHYD.PA vs ALGEV.PA Comparison May 2026
MLHYD.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLHYD.PA stands at 53M. In comparison, ALGEV.PA has a market cap of 149.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MLHYD.PA is priced at €760.00, while ALGEV.PA trades at €200.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLHYD.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.80, whereas ALGEV.PA's P/E ratio is 51.02. In terms of profitability, MLHYD.PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ALGEV.PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHYD.PA is less volatile compared to ALGEV.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHYD.PA.Check ALGEV.PA's competition here
MLHYD.PA vs ALPM.PA Comparison May 2026
MLHYD.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLHYD.PA stands at 53M. In comparison, ALPM.PA has a market cap of 141.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MLHYD.PA is priced at €760.00, while ALPM.PA trades at €26.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLHYD.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.80, whereas ALPM.PA's P/E ratio is 12.91. In terms of profitability, MLHYD.PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ALPM.PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHYD.PA is less volatile compared to ALPM.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHYD.PA.Check ALPM.PA's competition here
MLHYD.PA vs BALYO.PA Comparison May 2026
MLHYD.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLHYD.PA stands at 53M. In comparison, BALYO.PA has a market cap of 100.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MLHYD.PA is priced at €760.00, while BALYO.PA trades at €0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLHYD.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.80, whereas BALYO.PA's P/E ratio is -8.57. In terms of profitability, MLHYD.PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to BALYO.PA's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHYD.PA and BALYO.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check BALYO.PA's competition here
MLHYD.PA vs AGFB.BR Comparison May 2026
MLHYD.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLHYD.PA stands at 53M. In comparison, AGFB.BR has a market cap of 71.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MLHYD.PA is priced at €760.00, while AGFB.BR trades at €0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLHYD.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.80, whereas AGFB.BR's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, MLHYD.PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to AGFB.BR's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHYD.PA is less volatile compared to AGFB.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHYD.PA.Check AGFB.BR's competition here
MLHYD.PA vs MCPHY.PA Comparison May 2026
MLHYD.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLHYD.PA stands at 53M. In comparison, MCPHY.PA has a market cap of 65.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MLHYD.PA is priced at €760.00, while MCPHY.PA trades at €2.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLHYD.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.80, whereas MCPHY.PA's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, MLHYD.PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MCPHY.PA's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHYD.PA is less volatile compared to MCPHY.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHYD.PA.Check MCPHY.PA's competition here
MLHYD.PA vs PWG.PA Comparison May 2026
MLHYD.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLHYD.PA stands at 53M. In comparison, PWG.PA has a market cap of 43.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MLHYD.PA is priced at €760.00, while PWG.PA trades at €0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLHYD.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.80, whereas PWG.PA's P/E ratio is -2.72. In terms of profitability, MLHYD.PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to PWG.PA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHYD.PA is less volatile compared to PWG.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHYD.PA.Check PWG.PA's competition here
MLHYD.PA vs ALENO.PA Comparison May 2026
MLHYD.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLHYD.PA stands at 53M. In comparison, ALENO.PA has a market cap of 37.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MLHYD.PA is priced at €760.00, while ALENO.PA trades at €6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLHYD.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.80, whereas ALENO.PA's P/E ratio is 200.00. In terms of profitability, MLHYD.PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ALENO.PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHYD.PA is less volatile compared to ALENO.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHYD.PA.Check ALENO.PA's competition here
MLHYD.PA vs ALNSC.PA Comparison May 2026
MLHYD.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLHYD.PA stands at 53M. In comparison, ALNSC.PA has a market cap of 28.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MLHYD.PA is priced at €760.00, while ALNSC.PA trades at €68.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLHYD.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.80, whereas ALNSC.PA's P/E ratio is 3.53. In terms of profitability, MLHYD.PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ALNSC.PA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHYD.PA and ALNSC.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ALNSC.PA's competition here
MLHYD.PA vs MLROU.PA Comparison May 2026
MLHYD.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLHYD.PA stands at 53M. In comparison, MLROU.PA has a market cap of 22.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MLHYD.PA is priced at €760.00, while MLROU.PA trades at €37.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLHYD.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.80, whereas MLROU.PA's P/E ratio is 220.00. In terms of profitability, MLHYD.PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MLROU.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHYD.PA and MLROU.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MLROU.PA's competition here
MLHYD.PA vs ALCUR.PA Comparison May 2026
MLHYD.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLHYD.PA stands at 53M. In comparison, ALCUR.PA has a market cap of 17.7M. Regarding current trading prices, MLHYD.PA is priced at €760.00, while ALCUR.PA trades at €2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLHYD.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.80, whereas ALCUR.PA's P/E ratio is -7.45. In terms of profitability, MLHYD.PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ALCUR.PA's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHYD.PA is less volatile compared to ALCUR.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHYD.PA.Check ALCUR.PA's competition here
MLHYD.PA vs MLETA.PA Comparison May 2026
MLHYD.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLHYD.PA stands at 53M. In comparison, MLETA.PA has a market cap of 16.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MLHYD.PA is priced at €760.00, while MLETA.PA trades at €8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLHYD.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.80, whereas MLETA.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MLHYD.PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MLETA.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHYD.PA and MLETA.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MLETA.PA's competition here
MLHYD.PA vs ALBOA.PA Comparison May 2026
MLHYD.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLHYD.PA stands at 53M. In comparison, ALBOA.PA has a market cap of 12.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MLHYD.PA is priced at €760.00, while ALBOA.PA trades at €12.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLHYD.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.80, whereas ALBOA.PA's P/E ratio is -18.36. In terms of profitability, MLHYD.PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ALBOA.PA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHYD.PA is less volatile compared to ALBOA.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHYD.PA.Check ALBOA.PA's competition here
MLHYD.PA vs ALENE.PA Comparison May 2026
MLHYD.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLHYD.PA stands at 53M. In comparison, ALENE.PA has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MLHYD.PA is priced at €760.00, while ALENE.PA trades at €0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLHYD.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.80, whereas ALENE.PA's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, MLHYD.PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ALENE.PA's ROE of +1120.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHYD.PA is less volatile compared to ALENE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHYD.PA.Check ALENE.PA's competition here
MLHYD.PA vs ALDBT.PA Comparison May 2026
MLHYD.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLHYD.PA stands at 53M. In comparison, ALDBT.PA has a market cap of 197.8K. Regarding current trading prices, MLHYD.PA is priced at €760.00, while ALDBT.PA trades at €0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLHYD.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.80, whereas ALDBT.PA's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, MLHYD.PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ALDBT.PA's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHYD.PA is less volatile compared to ALDBT.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHYD.PA.Check ALDBT.PA's competition here
MLHYD.PA vs ALPCV.PA Comparison May 2026
MLHYD.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLHYD.PA stands at 53M. In comparison, ALPCV.PA has a market cap of 134.8K. Regarding current trading prices, MLHYD.PA is priced at €760.00, while ALPCV.PA trades at €0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLHYD.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.80, whereas ALPCV.PA's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, MLHYD.PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ALPCV.PA's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHYD.PA is less volatile compared to ALPCV.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHYD.PA.Check ALPCV.PA's competition here
MLHYD.PA vs ALHIO.PA Comparison May 2026
MLHYD.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLHYD.PA stands at 53M. In comparison, ALHIO.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MLHYD.PA is priced at €760.00, while ALHIO.PA trades at €4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLHYD.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.80, whereas ALHIO.PA's P/E ratio is 8.55. In terms of profitability, MLHYD.PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to ALHIO.PA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHYD.PA and ALHIO.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check ALHIO.PA's competition here
MLHYD.PA vs MLVIS.PA Comparison May 2026
MLHYD.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLHYD.PA stands at 53M. In comparison, MLVIS.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MLHYD.PA is priced at €760.00, while MLVIS.PA trades at €1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLHYD.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.80, whereas MLVIS.PA's P/E ratio is 132.31. In terms of profitability, MLHYD.PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MLVIS.PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHYD.PA and MLVIS.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MLVIS.PA's competition here
MLHYD.PA vs MLAAT.PA Comparison May 2026
MLHYD.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLHYD.PA stands at 53M. In comparison, MLAAT.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MLHYD.PA is priced at €760.00, while MLAAT.PA trades at €0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLHYD.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.80, whereas MLAAT.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MLHYD.PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to MLAAT.PA's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHYD.PA and MLAAT.PA have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check MLAAT.PA's competition here
MLHYD.PA vs HAMO.BR Comparison May 2026
MLHYD.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MLHYD.PA stands at 53M. In comparison, HAMO.BR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MLHYD.PA is priced at €760.00, while HAMO.BR trades at €0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MLHYD.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 1.80, whereas HAMO.BR's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, MLHYD.PA's ROE is +0.13%, compared to HAMO.BR's ROE of -13.54%. Regarding short-term risk, MLHYD.PA is less volatile compared to HAMO.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MLHYD.PA.Check HAMO.BR's competition here