Manitou BF SA
Manitou BF SA (MTU.PA) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (MTU.PA) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial - Machinery Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTU.PA | €20.40 | +0.00% | 788.3M | 11.51 | €1.79 | +6.07% |
| GNE.PA | €158.00 | -0.63% | 171.3B | 46.47 | €3.40 | N/A |
| SU.PA | €266.30 | +4.10% | 148.8B | 33.20 | €7.97 | +1.59% |
| SIA.BR | €136.72 | +0.56% | 108.3B | 12.25 | €11.16 | N/A |
| AALB.AS | €37.14 | +4.86% | 3.9B | 26.72 | €1.36 | +3.16% |
| MAREL.AS | €4.55 | +0.00% | 3.4B | 227.50 | €0.02 | N/A |
| PIC.BR | €66.00 | +0.00% | 1.3B | 9.48 | €6.96 | +0.30% |
| JEN.BR | €76.60 | +6.39% | 663M | 11.48 | €6.27 | +1.39% |
| WAGA.PA | €22.45 | -0.66% | 599M | -16.59 | -€1.35 | N/A |
| NHOA.PA | €1.24 | N/A | 342.6M | 3.03 | €0.41 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
MTU.PA vs GNE.PA Comparison May 2026
MTU.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTU.PA stands at 788.3M. In comparison, GNE.PA has a market cap of 171.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTU.PA is priced at €20.40, while GNE.PA trades at €158.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas GNE.PA's P/E ratio is 46.47. In terms of profitability, MTU.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to GNE.PA's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MTU.PA is less volatile compared to GNE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTU.PA.Check GNE.PA's competition here
MTU.PA vs SU.PA Comparison May 2026
MTU.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTU.PA stands at 788.3M. In comparison, SU.PA has a market cap of 148.8B. Regarding current trading prices, MTU.PA is priced at €20.40, while SU.PA trades at €266.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas SU.PA's P/E ratio is 33.20. In terms of profitability, MTU.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SU.PA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MTU.PA is more volatile compared to SU.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTU.PA.Check SU.PA's competition here
MTU.PA vs SIA.BR Comparison May 2026
MTU.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTU.PA stands at 788.3M. In comparison, SIA.BR has a market cap of 108.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTU.PA is priced at €20.40, while SIA.BR trades at €136.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas SIA.BR's P/E ratio is 12.25. In terms of profitability, MTU.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SIA.BR's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MTU.PA is more volatile compared to SIA.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTU.PA.Check SIA.BR's competition here
MTU.PA vs AALB.AS Comparison May 2026
MTU.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTU.PA stands at 788.3M. In comparison, AALB.AS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, MTU.PA is priced at €20.40, while AALB.AS trades at €37.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas AALB.AS's P/E ratio is 26.72. In terms of profitability, MTU.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AALB.AS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, MTU.PA is less volatile compared to AALB.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTU.PA.Check AALB.AS's competition here
MTU.PA vs MAREL.AS Comparison May 2026
MTU.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTU.PA stands at 788.3M. In comparison, MAREL.AS has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, MTU.PA is priced at €20.40, while MAREL.AS trades at €4.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas MAREL.AS's P/E ratio is 227.50. In terms of profitability, MTU.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MAREL.AS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MTU.PA is less volatile compared to MAREL.AS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTU.PA.Check MAREL.AS's competition here
MTU.PA vs PIC.BR Comparison May 2026
MTU.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTU.PA stands at 788.3M. In comparison, PIC.BR has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, MTU.PA is priced at €20.40, while PIC.BR trades at €66.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas PIC.BR's P/E ratio is 9.48. In terms of profitability, MTU.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PIC.BR's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MTU.PA is less volatile compared to PIC.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTU.PA.Check PIC.BR's competition here
MTU.PA vs JEN.BR Comparison May 2026
MTU.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTU.PA stands at 788.3M. In comparison, JEN.BR has a market cap of 663M. Regarding current trading prices, MTU.PA is priced at €20.40, while JEN.BR trades at €76.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas JEN.BR's P/E ratio is 11.48. In terms of profitability, MTU.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to JEN.BR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MTU.PA is less volatile compared to JEN.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTU.PA.Check JEN.BR's competition here
MTU.PA vs WAGA.PA Comparison May 2026
MTU.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTU.PA stands at 788.3M. In comparison, WAGA.PA has a market cap of 599M. Regarding current trading prices, MTU.PA is priced at €20.40, while WAGA.PA trades at €22.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas WAGA.PA's P/E ratio is -16.59. In terms of profitability, MTU.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to WAGA.PA's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, MTU.PA is more volatile compared to WAGA.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTU.PA.Check WAGA.PA's competition here
MTU.PA vs NHOA.PA Comparison May 2026
MTU.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTU.PA stands at 788.3M. In comparison, NHOA.PA has a market cap of 342.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MTU.PA is priced at €20.40, while NHOA.PA trades at €1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas NHOA.PA's P/E ratio is 3.03. In terms of profitability, MTU.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to NHOA.PA's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, MTU.PA is more volatile compared to NHOA.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTU.PA.Check NHOA.PA's competition here
MTU.PA vs SFPI.PA Comparison May 2026
MTU.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTU.PA stands at 788.3M. In comparison, SFPI.PA has a market cap of 178M. Regarding current trading prices, MTU.PA is priced at €20.40, while SFPI.PA trades at €1.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas SFPI.PA's P/E ratio is 10.72. In terms of profitability, MTU.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to SFPI.PA's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MTU.PA is less volatile compared to SFPI.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTU.PA.Check SFPI.PA's competition here
MTU.PA vs PREC.PA Comparison May 2026
MTU.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTU.PA stands at 788.3M. In comparison, PREC.PA has a market cap of 151.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MTU.PA is priced at €20.40, while PREC.PA trades at €24.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas PREC.PA's P/E ratio is 23.94. In terms of profitability, MTU.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PREC.PA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MTU.PA is less volatile compared to PREC.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTU.PA.Check PREC.PA's competition here
MTU.PA vs ALGEV.PA Comparison May 2026
MTU.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTU.PA stands at 788.3M. In comparison, ALGEV.PA has a market cap of 149.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MTU.PA is priced at €20.40, while ALGEV.PA trades at €200.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas ALGEV.PA's P/E ratio is 50.89. In terms of profitability, MTU.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ALGEV.PA's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, MTU.PA is more volatile compared to ALGEV.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTU.PA.Check ALGEV.PA's competition here
MTU.PA vs ALPM.PA Comparison May 2026
MTU.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTU.PA stands at 788.3M. In comparison, ALPM.PA has a market cap of 141.6M. Regarding current trading prices, MTU.PA is priced at €20.40, while ALPM.PA trades at €26.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas ALPM.PA's P/E ratio is 12.91. In terms of profitability, MTU.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ALPM.PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, MTU.PA is more volatile compared to ALPM.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTU.PA.Check ALPM.PA's competition here
MTU.PA vs BALYO.PA Comparison May 2026
MTU.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTU.PA stands at 788.3M. In comparison, BALYO.PA has a market cap of 100.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MTU.PA is priced at €20.40, while BALYO.PA trades at €0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas BALYO.PA's P/E ratio is -8.57. In terms of profitability, MTU.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to BALYO.PA's ROE of -1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, MTU.PA is more volatile compared to BALYO.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTU.PA.Check BALYO.PA's competition here
MTU.PA vs AGFB.BR Comparison May 2026
MTU.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTU.PA stands at 788.3M. In comparison, AGFB.BR has a market cap of 72.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MTU.PA is priced at €20.40, while AGFB.BR trades at €0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas AGFB.BR's P/E ratio is -1.41. In terms of profitability, MTU.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to AGFB.BR's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, MTU.PA is more volatile compared to AGFB.BR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTU.PA.Check AGFB.BR's competition here
MTU.PA vs MCPHY.PA Comparison May 2026
MTU.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTU.PA stands at 788.3M. In comparison, MCPHY.PA has a market cap of 65.1M. Regarding current trading prices, MTU.PA is priced at €20.40, while MCPHY.PA trades at €2.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas MCPHY.PA's P/E ratio is -1.36. In terms of profitability, MTU.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MCPHY.PA's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, MTU.PA is less volatile compared to MCPHY.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTU.PA.Check MCPHY.PA's competition here
MTU.PA vs MLHYD.PA Comparison May 2026
MTU.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTU.PA stands at 788.3M. In comparison, MLHYD.PA has a market cap of 53M. Regarding current trading prices, MTU.PA is priced at €20.40, while MLHYD.PA trades at €760.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas MLHYD.PA's P/E ratio is 1.80. In terms of profitability, MTU.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MLHYD.PA's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, MTU.PA is more volatile compared to MLHYD.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTU.PA.Check MLHYD.PA's competition here
MTU.PA vs PWG.PA Comparison May 2026
MTU.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTU.PA stands at 788.3M. In comparison, PWG.PA has a market cap of 43.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MTU.PA is priced at €20.40, while PWG.PA trades at €0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas PWG.PA's P/E ratio is -2.72. In terms of profitability, MTU.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to PWG.PA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MTU.PA is less volatile compared to PWG.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTU.PA.Check PWG.PA's competition here
MTU.PA vs ALENO.PA Comparison May 2026
MTU.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTU.PA stands at 788.3M. In comparison, ALENO.PA has a market cap of 37.3M. Regarding current trading prices, MTU.PA is priced at €20.40, while ALENO.PA trades at €6.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas ALENO.PA's P/E ratio is 198.00. In terms of profitability, MTU.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ALENO.PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MTU.PA is more volatile compared to ALENO.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTU.PA.Check ALENO.PA's competition here
MTU.PA vs ALNSC.PA Comparison May 2026
MTU.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTU.PA stands at 788.3M. In comparison, ALNSC.PA has a market cap of 28.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MTU.PA is priced at €20.40, while ALNSC.PA trades at €68.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas ALNSC.PA's P/E ratio is 3.53. In terms of profitability, MTU.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ALNSC.PA's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, MTU.PA is more volatile compared to ALNSC.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTU.PA.Check ALNSC.PA's competition here
MTU.PA vs MLROU.PA Comparison May 2026
MTU.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTU.PA stands at 788.3M. In comparison, MLROU.PA has a market cap of 22.8M. Regarding current trading prices, MTU.PA is priced at €20.40, while MLROU.PA trades at €37.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas MLROU.PA's P/E ratio is 220.00. In terms of profitability, MTU.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MLROU.PA's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, MTU.PA is more volatile compared to MLROU.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTU.PA.Check MLROU.PA's competition here
MTU.PA vs ALCUR.PA Comparison May 2026
MTU.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTU.PA stands at 788.3M. In comparison, ALCUR.PA has a market cap of 18.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MTU.PA is priced at €20.40, while ALCUR.PA trades at €2.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas ALCUR.PA's P/E ratio is -7.75. In terms of profitability, MTU.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ALCUR.PA's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, MTU.PA is less volatile compared to ALCUR.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTU.PA.Check ALCUR.PA's competition here
MTU.PA vs MLETA.PA Comparison May 2026
MTU.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTU.PA stands at 788.3M. In comparison, MLETA.PA has a market cap of 16.4M. Regarding current trading prices, MTU.PA is priced at €20.40, while MLETA.PA trades at €8.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas MLETA.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTU.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MLETA.PA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, MTU.PA is more volatile compared to MLETA.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTU.PA.Check MLETA.PA's competition here
MTU.PA vs ALBOA.PA Comparison May 2026
MTU.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTU.PA stands at 788.3M. In comparison, ALBOA.PA has a market cap of 12.5M. Regarding current trading prices, MTU.PA is priced at €20.40, while ALBOA.PA trades at €12.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas ALBOA.PA's P/E ratio is -18.43. In terms of profitability, MTU.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ALBOA.PA's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, MTU.PA is more volatile compared to ALBOA.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTU.PA.Check ALBOA.PA's competition here
MTU.PA vs ALENE.PA Comparison May 2026
MTU.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTU.PA stands at 788.3M. In comparison, ALENE.PA has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, MTU.PA is priced at €20.40, while ALENE.PA trades at €0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas ALENE.PA's P/E ratio is -0.55. In terms of profitability, MTU.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ALENE.PA's ROE of +1120.06%. Regarding short-term risk, MTU.PA is less volatile compared to ALENE.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTU.PA.Check ALENE.PA's competition here
MTU.PA vs ALDBT.PA Comparison May 2026
MTU.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTU.PA stands at 788.3M. In comparison, ALDBT.PA has a market cap of 193.7K. Regarding current trading prices, MTU.PA is priced at €20.40, while ALDBT.PA trades at €0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas ALDBT.PA's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, MTU.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ALDBT.PA's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, MTU.PA is less volatile compared to ALDBT.PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTU.PA.Check ALDBT.PA's competition here
MTU.PA vs ALPCV.PA Comparison May 2026
MTU.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTU.PA stands at 788.3M. In comparison, ALPCV.PA has a market cap of 134.8K. Regarding current trading prices, MTU.PA is priced at €20.40, while ALPCV.PA trades at €0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas ALPCV.PA's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, MTU.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ALPCV.PA's ROE of -1.42%. Regarding short-term risk, MTU.PA is more volatile compared to ALPCV.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTU.PA.Check ALPCV.PA's competition here
MTU.PA vs MLVIS.PA Comparison May 2026
MTU.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTU.PA stands at 788.3M. In comparison, MLVIS.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MTU.PA is priced at €20.40, while MLVIS.PA trades at €1.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas MLVIS.PA's P/E ratio is 132.31. In terms of profitability, MTU.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MLVIS.PA's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, MTU.PA is more volatile compared to MLVIS.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTU.PA.Check MLVIS.PA's competition here
MTU.PA vs ALHIO.PA Comparison May 2026
MTU.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTU.PA stands at 788.3M. In comparison, ALHIO.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MTU.PA is priced at €20.40, while ALHIO.PA trades at €4.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas ALHIO.PA's P/E ratio is 8.55. In terms of profitability, MTU.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to ALHIO.PA's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MTU.PA is more volatile compared to ALHIO.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTU.PA.Check ALHIO.PA's competition here
MTU.PA vs HAMO.BR Comparison May 2026
MTU.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTU.PA stands at 788.3M. In comparison, HAMO.BR has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MTU.PA is priced at €20.40, while HAMO.BR trades at €0.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas HAMO.BR's P/E ratio is -0.51. In terms of profitability, MTU.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to HAMO.BR's ROE of -13.54%. Regarding short-term risk, MTU.PA is less volatile compared to HAMO.BR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTU.PA.Check HAMO.BR's competition here
MTU.PA vs MLAAT.PA Comparison May 2026
MTU.PA plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, MTU.PA stands at 788.3M. In comparison, MLAAT.PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, MTU.PA is priced at €20.40, while MLAAT.PA trades at €0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
MTU.PA currently has a P/E ratio of 11.51, whereas MLAAT.PA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, MTU.PA's ROE is +0.05%, compared to MLAAT.PA's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, MTU.PA is more volatile compared to MLAAT.PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for MTU.PA.Check MLAAT.PA's competition here