Staffing 360 Solutions, Inc.
Staffing 360 Solutions, Inc. (STAF) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (STAF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Staffing & Employment Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STAF | $1.62 | +0.00% | 2.7M | -0.04 | -$36.60 | N/A |
| ADP | $300.44 | -2.93% | 122B | 30.13 | $9.97 | +2.00% |
| PAYX | $139.34 | -3.46% | 50.2B | 30.42 | $4.58 | +2.97% |
| BZ | $18.66 | -1.58% | 4.3B | 32.74 | $0.57 | N/A |
| RHI | $35.34 | -4.25% | 3.6B | 20.19 | $1.75 | +6.32% |
| KFY | $69.05 | -2.57% | 3.6B | 15.01 | $4.60 | +2.46% |
| TNET | $63.30 | -6.65% | 3.1B | 21.60 | $2.93 | +1.64% |
| MAN | $39.25 | -4.85% | 1.8B | -109.00 | -$0.36 | +5.73% |
| NSP | $45.07 | -24.35% | 1.7B | 26.68 | $1.69 | +5.19% |
| UPWK | $11.75 | -1.76% | 1.5B | 7.08 | $1.66 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
STAF vs ADP Comparison August 2025
STAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAF stands at 2.7M. In comparison, ADP has a market cap of 122B. Regarding current trading prices, STAF is priced at $1.62, while ADP trades at $300.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ADP's P/E ratio is 30.13. In terms of profitability, STAF's ROE is +2.10%, compared to ADP's ROE of +0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, STAF is less volatile compared to ADP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAF.Check ADP's competition here
STAF vs PAYX Comparison August 2025
STAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAF stands at 2.7M. In comparison, PAYX has a market cap of 50.2B. Regarding current trading prices, STAF is priced at $1.62, while PAYX trades at $139.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas PAYX's P/E ratio is 30.42. In terms of profitability, STAF's ROE is +2.10%, compared to PAYX's ROE of +0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, STAF is less volatile compared to PAYX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAF.Check PAYX's competition here
STAF vs BZ Comparison August 2025
STAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAF stands at 2.7M. In comparison, BZ has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, STAF is priced at $1.62, while BZ trades at $18.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas BZ's P/E ratio is 32.74. In terms of profitability, STAF's ROE is +2.10%, compared to BZ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, STAF is less volatile compared to BZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAF.Check BZ's competition here
STAF vs RHI Comparison August 2025
STAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAF stands at 2.7M. In comparison, RHI has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, STAF is priced at $1.62, while RHI trades at $35.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas RHI's P/E ratio is 20.19. In terms of profitability, STAF's ROE is +2.10%, compared to RHI's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, STAF is less volatile compared to RHI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAF.Check RHI's competition here
STAF vs KFY Comparison August 2025
STAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAF stands at 2.7M. In comparison, KFY has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, STAF is priced at $1.62, while KFY trades at $69.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas KFY's P/E ratio is 15.01. In terms of profitability, STAF's ROE is +2.10%, compared to KFY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, STAF is less volatile compared to KFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAF.Check KFY's competition here
STAF vs TNET Comparison August 2025
STAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAF stands at 2.7M. In comparison, TNET has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, STAF is priced at $1.62, while TNET trades at $63.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas TNET's P/E ratio is 21.60. In terms of profitability, STAF's ROE is +2.10%, compared to TNET's ROE of +1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, STAF is less volatile compared to TNET. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAF.Check TNET's competition here
STAF vs MAN Comparison August 2025
STAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAF stands at 2.7M. In comparison, MAN has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, STAF is priced at $1.62, while MAN trades at $39.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas MAN's P/E ratio is -109.00. In terms of profitability, STAF's ROE is +2.10%, compared to MAN's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, STAF is less volatile compared to MAN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAF.Check MAN's competition here
STAF vs NSP Comparison August 2025
STAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAF stands at 2.7M. In comparison, NSP has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, STAF is priced at $1.62, while NSP trades at $45.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas NSP's P/E ratio is 26.68. In terms of profitability, STAF's ROE is +2.10%, compared to NSP's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, STAF is less volatile compared to NSP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAF.Check NSP's competition here
STAF vs UPWK Comparison August 2025
STAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAF stands at 2.7M. In comparison, UPWK has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, STAF is priced at $1.62, while UPWK trades at $11.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas UPWK's P/E ratio is 7.08. In terms of profitability, STAF's ROE is +2.10%, compared to UPWK's ROE of +0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, STAF is less volatile compared to UPWK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAF.Check UPWK's competition here
STAF vs BBSI Comparison August 2025
STAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAF stands at 2.7M. In comparison, BBSI has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, STAF is priced at $1.62, while BBSI trades at $44.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas BBSI's P/E ratio is 22.58. In terms of profitability, STAF's ROE is +2.10%, compared to BBSI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, STAF is less volatile compared to BBSI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAF.Check BBSI's competition here
STAF vs HRT Comparison August 2025
STAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAF stands at 2.7M. In comparison, HRT has a market cap of 967.2M. Regarding current trading prices, STAF is priced at $1.62, while HRT trades at $14.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas HRT's P/E ratio is -130.55. In terms of profitability, STAF's ROE is +2.10%, compared to HRT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, STAF is less volatile compared to HRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAF.Check HRT's competition here
STAF vs HSII Comparison August 2025
STAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAF stands at 2.7M. In comparison, HSII has a market cap of 887.7M. Regarding current trading prices, STAF is priced at $1.62, while HSII trades at $43.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas HSII's P/E ratio is 119.58. In terms of profitability, STAF's ROE is +2.10%, compared to HSII's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, STAF is less volatile compared to HSII. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAF.Check HSII's competition here
STAF vs HHR Comparison August 2025
STAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAF stands at 2.7M. In comparison, HHR has a market cap of 761.1M. Regarding current trading prices, STAF is priced at $1.62, while HHR trades at $15.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas HHR's P/E ratio is 9.05. In terms of profitability, STAF's ROE is +2.10%, compared to HHR's ROE of +0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, STAF is less volatile compared to HHR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAF.Check HHR's competition here
STAF vs KFRC Comparison August 2025
STAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAF stands at 2.7M. In comparison, KFRC has a market cap of 636.8M. Regarding current trading prices, STAF is priced at $1.62, while KFRC trades at $34.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas KFRC's P/E ratio is 14.39. In terms of profitability, STAF's ROE is +2.10%, compared to KFRC's ROE of +0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, STAF is less volatile compared to KFRC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAF.Check KFRC's competition here
STAF vs KELYB Comparison August 2025
STAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAF stands at 2.7M. In comparison, KELYB has a market cap of 432.9M. Regarding current trading prices, STAF is priced at $1.62, while KELYB trades at $12.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas KELYB's P/E ratio is -21.97. In terms of profitability, STAF's ROE is +2.10%, compared to KELYB's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, STAF and KELYB have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check KELYB's competition here
STAF vs KELYA Comparison August 2025
STAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAF stands at 2.7M. In comparison, KELYA has a market cap of 426.1M. Regarding current trading prices, STAF is priced at $1.62, while KELYA trades at $12.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas KELYA's P/E ratio is -21.18. In terms of profitability, STAF's ROE is +2.10%, compared to KELYA's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, STAF is less volatile compared to KELYA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAF.Check KELYA's competition here
STAF vs ZIP Comparison August 2025
STAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAF stands at 2.7M. In comparison, ZIP has a market cap of 367.4M. Regarding current trading prices, STAF is priced at $1.62, while ZIP trades at $3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ZIP's P/E ratio is -20.82. In terms of profitability, STAF's ROE is +2.10%, compared to ZIP's ROE of -1.91%. Regarding short-term risk, STAF is less volatile compared to ZIP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAF.Check ZIP's competition here
STAF vs TBI Comparison August 2025
STAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAF stands at 2.7M. In comparison, TBI has a market cap of 198.6M. Regarding current trading prices, STAF is priced at $1.62, while TBI trades at $6.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas TBI's P/E ratio is -1.45. In terms of profitability, STAF's ROE is +2.10%, compared to TBI's ROE of -0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, STAF is less volatile compared to TBI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAF.Check TBI's competition here
STAF vs HQI Comparison August 2025
STAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAF stands at 2.7M. In comparison, HQI has a market cap of 136.9M. Regarding current trading prices, STAF is priced at $1.62, while HQI trades at $9.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas HQI's P/E ratio is 37.62. In terms of profitability, STAF's ROE is +2.10%, compared to HQI's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, STAF is less volatile compared to HQI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAF.Check HQI's competition here
STAF vs DHX Comparison August 2025
STAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAF stands at 2.7M. In comparison, DHX has a market cap of 127.2M. Regarding current trading prices, STAF is priced at $1.62, while DHX trades at $2.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas DHX's P/E ratio is -15.35. In terms of profitability, STAF's ROE is +2.10%, compared to DHX's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, STAF is less volatile compared to DHX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAF.Check DHX's competition here
STAF vs VOLT Comparison August 2025
STAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAF stands at 2.7M. In comparison, VOLT has a market cap of 97.6M. Regarding current trading prices, STAF is priced at $1.62, while VOLT trades at $27.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas VOLT's P/E ratio is 29.31. In terms of profitability, STAF's ROE is +2.10%, compared to VOLT's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, STAF is less volatile compared to VOLT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAF.Check VOLT's competition here
STAF vs MHH Comparison August 2025
STAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAF stands at 2.7M. In comparison, MHH has a market cap of 86.5M. Regarding current trading prices, STAF is priced at $1.62, while MHH trades at $7.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas MHH's P/E ratio is 43.23. In terms of profitability, STAF's ROE is +2.10%, compared to MHH's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, STAF is less volatile compared to MHH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAF.Check MHH's competition here
STAF vs BGSF Comparison August 2025
STAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAF stands at 2.7M. In comparison, BGSF has a market cap of 68M. Regarding current trading prices, STAF is priced at $1.62, while BGSF trades at $6.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas BGSF's P/E ratio is -19.67. In terms of profitability, STAF's ROE is +2.10%, compared to BGSF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, STAF is less volatile compared to BGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAF.Check BGSF's competition here
STAF vs NIXXW Comparison August 2025
STAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAF stands at 2.7M. In comparison, NIXXW has a market cap of 33.7M. Regarding current trading prices, STAF is priced at $1.62, while NIXXW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas NIXXW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STAF's ROE is +2.10%, compared to NIXXW's ROE of -6.03%. Regarding short-term risk, STAF is less volatile compared to NIXXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAF.Check NIXXW's competition here
STAF vs NIXX Comparison August 2025
STAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAF stands at 2.7M. In comparison, NIXX has a market cap of 33.5M. Regarding current trading prices, STAF is priced at $1.62, while NIXX trades at $1.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas NIXX's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, STAF's ROE is +2.10%, compared to NIXX's ROE of -6.03%. Regarding short-term risk, STAF is less volatile compared to NIXX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAF.Check NIXX's competition here
STAF vs HSON Comparison August 2025
STAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAF stands at 2.7M. In comparison, HSON has a market cap of 25.6M. Regarding current trading prices, STAF is priced at $1.62, while HSON trades at $9.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas HSON's P/E ratio is -7.56. In terms of profitability, STAF's ROE is +2.10%, compared to HSON's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, STAF and HSON have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check HSON's competition here
STAF vs JOB Comparison August 2025
STAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAF stands at 2.7M. In comparison, JOB has a market cap of 21.9M. Regarding current trading prices, STAF is priced at $1.62, while JOB trades at $0.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas JOB's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, STAF's ROE is +2.10%, compared to JOB's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, STAF is less volatile compared to JOB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAF.Check JOB's competition here
STAF vs RCRT Comparison August 2025
STAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAF stands at 2.7M. In comparison, RCRT has a market cap of 11M. Regarding current trading prices, STAF is priced at $1.62, while RCRT trades at $2.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas RCRT's P/E ratio is -0.98. In terms of profitability, STAF's ROE is +2.10%, compared to RCRT's ROE of -34.88%. Regarding short-term risk, STAF is less volatile compared to RCRT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAF.Check RCRT's competition here
STAF vs GLXG Comparison August 2025
STAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAF stands at 2.7M. In comparison, GLXG has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, STAF is priced at $1.62, while GLXG trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas GLXG's P/E ratio is -19.80. In terms of profitability, STAF's ROE is +2.10%, compared to GLXG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, STAF is less volatile compared to GLXG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAF.Check GLXG's competition here
STAF vs EPWK Comparison August 2025
STAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAF stands at 2.7M. In comparison, EPWK has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, STAF is priced at $1.62, while EPWK trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas EPWK's P/E ratio is -5.73. In terms of profitability, STAF's ROE is +2.10%, compared to EPWK's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, STAF is less volatile compared to EPWK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAF.Check EPWK's competition here
STAF vs CLIK Comparison August 2025
STAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAF stands at 2.7M. In comparison, CLIK has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, STAF is priced at $1.62, while CLIK trades at $0.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas CLIK's P/E ratio is 5.70. In terms of profitability, STAF's ROE is +2.10%, compared to CLIK's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, STAF is less volatile compared to CLIK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAF.Check CLIK's competition here
STAF vs IPDN Comparison August 2025
STAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAF stands at 2.7M. In comparison, IPDN has a market cap of 3.8M. Regarding current trading prices, STAF is priced at $1.62, while IPDN trades at $1.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas IPDN's P/E ratio is -1.03. In terms of profitability, STAF's ROE is +2.10%, compared to IPDN's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, STAF is less volatile compared to IPDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAF.Check IPDN's competition here
STAF vs PIXY Comparison August 2025
STAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAF stands at 2.7M. In comparison, PIXY has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, STAF is priced at $1.62, while PIXY trades at $6.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas PIXY's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, STAF's ROE is +2.10%, compared to PIXY's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, STAF is less volatile compared to PIXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAF.Check PIXY's competition here
STAF vs RCRTW Comparison August 2025
STAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAF stands at 2.7M. In comparison, RCRTW has a market cap of 11.5K. Regarding current trading prices, STAF is priced at $1.62, while RCRTW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas RCRTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, STAF's ROE is +2.10%, compared to RCRTW's ROE of -6.03%. Regarding short-term risk, STAF is less volatile compared to RCRTW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAF.Check RCRTW's competition here
STAF vs JOBS Comparison August 2025
STAF plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, STAF stands at 2.7M. In comparison, JOBS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, STAF is priced at $1.62, while JOBS trades at $60.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
STAF currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas JOBS's P/E ratio is 42.20. In terms of profitability, STAF's ROE is +2.10%, compared to JOBS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, STAF is less volatile compared to JOBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for STAF.Check JOBS's competition here