SSR Mining Inc.
SSR Mining Inc. (SSRM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SSRM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SSRM | $27.79 | -5.70% | 5.7B | 15.23 | $1.85 | N/A |
| NEM | $109.21 | -4.60% | 119.6B | 17.17 | $6.38 | +0.92% |
| AEM | $207.54 | -4.90% | 103.9B | 23.87 | $8.69 | +0.79% |
| B | $42.47 | -4.55% | 70.9B | 14.44 | $2.93 | +1.99% |
| WPM | $137.26 | -5.81% | 63.5B | 63.57 | $2.20 | +0.47% |
| FNV | $252.55 | -4.16% | 48.5B | 52.68 | $4.78 | +0.63% |
| AU | $95.30 | -8.98% | 47.9B | 17.73 | $5.35 | +4.47% |
| GFI | $46.56 | -8.62% | 40.7B | 11.55 | $3.94 | +4.03% |
| KGC | $30.53 | -6.13% | 36.9B | 15.68 | $1.95 | +0.44% |
| HL-PB | $68.11 | -6.57% | 32.7B | 2270.33 | $0.03 | +0.08% |
Stock Comparison
SSRM vs NEM Comparison March 2026
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 5.7B. In comparison, NEM has a market cap of 119.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $27.79, while NEM trades at $109.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas NEM's P/E ratio is 17.17. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NEM's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is more volatile compared to NEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.Check NEM's competition here
SSRM vs AEM Comparison March 2026
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 5.7B. In comparison, AEM has a market cap of 103.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $27.79, while AEM trades at $207.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas AEM's P/E ratio is 23.87. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AEM's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is more volatile compared to AEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.Check AEM's competition here
SSRM vs B Comparison March 2026
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 5.7B. In comparison, B has a market cap of 70.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $27.79, while B trades at $42.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas B's P/E ratio is 14.44. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to B's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is more volatile compared to B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.Check B's competition here
SSRM vs WPM Comparison March 2026
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 5.7B. In comparison, WPM has a market cap of 63.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $27.79, while WPM trades at $137.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas WPM's P/E ratio is 63.57. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to WPM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is more volatile compared to WPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.Check WPM's competition here
SSRM vs FNV Comparison March 2026
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 5.7B. In comparison, FNV has a market cap of 48.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $27.79, while FNV trades at $252.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas FNV's P/E ratio is 52.68. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FNV's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is more volatile compared to FNV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.Check FNV's competition here
SSRM vs AU Comparison March 2026
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 5.7B. In comparison, AU has a market cap of 47.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $27.79, while AU trades at $95.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas AU's P/E ratio is 17.73. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AU's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is more volatile compared to AU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.Check AU's competition here
SSRM vs GFI Comparison March 2026
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 5.7B. In comparison, GFI has a market cap of 40.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $27.79, while GFI trades at $46.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas GFI's P/E ratio is 11.55. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GFI's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is more volatile compared to GFI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.Check GFI's competition here
SSRM vs KGC Comparison March 2026
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 5.7B. In comparison, KGC has a market cap of 36.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $27.79, while KGC trades at $30.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas KGC's P/E ratio is 15.68. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KGC's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is more volatile compared to KGC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.Check KGC's competition here
SSRM vs HL-PB Comparison March 2026
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 5.7B. In comparison, HL-PB has a market cap of 32.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $27.79, while HL-PB trades at $68.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas HL-PB's P/E ratio is 2270.33. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HL-PB's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is more volatile compared to HL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.Check HL-PB's competition here
SSRM vs AGI Comparison March 2026
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 5.7B. In comparison, AGI has a market cap of 19.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $27.79, while AGI trades at $45.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas AGI's P/E ratio is 21.83. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AGI's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is more volatile compared to AGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.Check AGI's competition here
SSRM vs RGLD Comparison March 2026
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 5.7B. In comparison, RGLD has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $27.79, while RGLD trades at $247.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas RGLD's P/E ratio is 38.67. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to RGLD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is more volatile compared to RGLD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.Check RGLD's competition here
SSRM vs HL Comparison March 2026
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 5.7B. In comparison, HL has a market cap of 13.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $27.79, while HL trades at $19.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas HL's P/E ratio is 39.98. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HL's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is more volatile compared to HL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.Check HL's competition here
SSRM vs CDE Comparison March 2026
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 5.7B. In comparison, CDE has a market cap of 13B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $27.79, while CDE trades at $20.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas CDE's P/E ratio is 21.26. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CDE's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is more volatile compared to CDE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.Check CDE's competition here
SSRM vs IAG Comparison March 2026
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 5.7B. In comparison, IAG has a market cap of 11.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $27.79, while IAG trades at $19.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas IAG's P/E ratio is 17.39. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IAG's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is less volatile compared to IAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.Check IAG's competition here
SSRM vs EQX Comparison March 2026
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 5.7B. In comparison, EQX has a market cap of 11.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $27.79, while EQX trades at $14.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas EQX's P/E ratio is -485.33. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EQX's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is more volatile compared to EQX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.Check EQX's competition here
SSRM vs HMY Comparison March 2026
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 5.7B. In comparison, HMY has a market cap of 9.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $27.79, while HMY trades at $15.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas HMY's P/E ratio is 10.96. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HMY's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is more volatile compared to HMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.Check HMY's competition here
SSRM vs SBSW Comparison March 2026
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 5.7B. In comparison, SBSW has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $27.79, while SBSW trades at $13.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas SBSW's P/E ratio is -27.92. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SBSW's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is more volatile compared to SBSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.Check SBSW's competition here
SSRM vs NGD Comparison March 2026
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 5.7B. In comparison, NGD has a market cap of 7.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $27.79, while NGD trades at $9.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas NGD's P/E ratio is 31.13. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NGD's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is more volatile compared to NGD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.Check NGD's competition here
SSRM vs OR Comparison March 2026
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 5.7B. In comparison, OR has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $27.79, while OR trades at $39.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas OR's P/E ratio is 37.00. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to OR's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is more volatile compared to OR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.Check OR's competition here
SSRM vs EGO Comparison March 2026
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 5.7B. In comparison, EGO has a market cap of 7.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $27.79, while EGO trades at $37.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas EGO's P/E ratio is 14.53. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to EGO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is more volatile compared to EGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.Check EGO's competition here
SSRM vs BTG Comparison March 2026
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 5.7B. In comparison, BTG has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $27.79, while BTG trades at $4.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas BTG's P/E ratio is 17.27. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BTG's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is more volatile compared to BTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.Check BTG's competition here
SSRM vs AUY Comparison March 2026
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 5.7B. In comparison, AUY has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $27.79, while AUY trades at $5.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas AUY's P/E ratio is -5.79. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AUY's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is more volatile compared to AUY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.Check AUY's competition here
SSRM vs ORLA Comparison March 2026
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 5.7B. In comparison, ORLA has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $27.79, while ORLA trades at $16.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas ORLA's P/E ratio is 102.13. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ORLA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is more volatile compared to ORLA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.Check ORLA's competition here
SSRM vs FSAGX Comparison March 2026
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 5.7B. In comparison, FSAGX has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $27.79, while FSAGX trades at $65.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas FSAGX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to FSAGX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is more volatile compared to FSAGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.Check FSAGX's competition here
SSRM vs NG Comparison March 2026
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 5.7B. In comparison, NG has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $27.79, while NG trades at $9.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas NG's P/E ratio is -41.62. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NG's ROE of -0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is less volatile compared to NG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.Check NG's competition here
SSRM vs ARMN Comparison March 2026
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 5.7B. In comparison, ARMN has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $27.79, while ARMN trades at $22.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas ARMN's P/E ratio is 81.93. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ARMN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is more volatile compared to ARMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.Check ARMN's competition here
SSRM vs AAUC Comparison March 2026
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 5.7B. In comparison, AAUC has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $27.79, while AAUC trades at $31.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas AAUC's P/E ratio is -110.93. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AAUC's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is more volatile compared to AAUC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.Check AAUC's competition here
SSRM vs SAND Comparison March 2026
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 5.7B. In comparison, SAND has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $27.79, while SAND trades at $12.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas SAND's P/E ratio is 101.00. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SAND's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is less volatile compared to SAND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.Check SAND's competition here
SSRM vs CGAU Comparison March 2026
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 5.7B. In comparison, CGAU has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $27.79, while CGAU trades at $18.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas CGAU's P/E ratio is 6.21. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CGAU's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is less volatile compared to CGAU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.Check CGAU's competition here
SSRM vs HYMC Comparison March 2026
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 5.7B. In comparison, HYMC has a market cap of 3.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $27.79, while HYMC trades at $38.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas HYMC's P/E ratio is -40.35. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HYMC's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is less volatile compared to HYMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.Check HYMC's competition here
SSRM vs SA Comparison March 2026
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 5.7B. In comparison, SA has a market cap of 3.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $27.79, while SA trades at $30.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas SA's P/E ratio is -78.40. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to SA's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is less volatile compared to SA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.Check SA's competition here
SSRM vs DRD Comparison March 2026
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 5.7B. In comparison, DRD has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $27.79, while DRD trades at $30.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas DRD's P/E ratio is 19.07. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DRD's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is more volatile compared to DRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.Check DRD's competition here
SSRM vs IAUX Comparison March 2026
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 5.7B. In comparison, IAUX has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $27.79, while IAUX trades at $1.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas IAUX's P/E ratio is -5.52. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IAUX's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is more volatile compared to IAUX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.Check IAUX's competition here
SSRM vs DC Comparison March 2026
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 5.7B. In comparison, DC has a market cap of 709.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $27.79, while DC trades at $5.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas DC's P/E ratio is -22.08. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DC's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is more volatile compared to DC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.Check DC's competition here
SSRM vs GAU Comparison March 2026
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 5.7B. In comparison, GAU has a market cap of 656M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $27.79, while GAU trades at $2.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas GAU's P/E ratio is -22.95. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GAU's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is less volatile compared to GAU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.Check GAU's competition here
SSRM vs NFGC Comparison March 2026
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 5.7B. In comparison, NFGC has a market cap of 567M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $27.79, while NFGC trades at $2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas NFGC's P/E ratio is -14.44. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NFGC's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is less volatile compared to NFGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.Check NFGC's competition here
SSRM vs IDR Comparison March 2026
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 5.7B. In comparison, IDR has a market cap of 549.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $27.79, while IDR trades at $34.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas IDR's P/E ratio is 48.96. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to IDR's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is more volatile compared to IDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.Check IDR's competition here
SSRM vs ODV Comparison March 2026
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 5.7B. In comparison, ODV has a market cap of 542.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $27.79, while ODV trades at $3.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas ODV's P/E ratio is -3.11. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ODV's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is more volatile compared to ODV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.Check ODV's competition here
SSRM vs THM Comparison March 2026
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 5.7B. In comparison, THM has a market cap of 529.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $27.79, while THM trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas THM's P/E ratio is -85.17. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to THM's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is less volatile compared to THM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.Check THM's competition here
SSRM vs CMCL Comparison March 2026
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 5.7B. In comparison, CMCL has a market cap of 485.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $27.79, while CMCL trades at $25.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas CMCL's P/E ratio is 9.82. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CMCL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is more volatile compared to CMCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.Check CMCL's competition here
SSRM vs NVAWW Comparison March 2026
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 5.7B. In comparison, NVAWW has a market cap of 474.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $27.79, while NVAWW trades at $30.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas NVAWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NVAWW's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is less volatile compared to NVAWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.Check NVAWW's competition here
SSRM vs TRX Comparison March 2026
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 5.7B. In comparison, TRX has a market cap of 457.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $27.79, while TRX trades at $1.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas TRX's P/E ratio is -159.50. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to TRX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is more volatile compared to TRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.Check TRX's competition here
SSRM vs GSS Comparison March 2026
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 5.7B. In comparison, GSS has a market cap of 451.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $27.79, while GSS trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas GSS's P/E ratio is -48.75. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GSS's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is more volatile compared to GSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.Check GSS's competition here
SSRM vs DC-WT Comparison March 2026
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 5.7B. In comparison, DC-WT has a market cap of 438.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $27.79, while DC-WT trades at $3.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas DC-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to DC-WT's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is less volatile compared to DC-WT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.Check DC-WT's competition here
SSRM vs GLDG Comparison March 2026
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 5.7B. In comparison, GLDG has a market cap of 297.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $27.79, while GLDG trades at $1.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas GLDG's P/E ratio is -27.80. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GLDG's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is more volatile compared to GLDG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.Check GLDG's competition here
SSRM vs CTGO Comparison March 2026
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 5.7B. In comparison, CTGO has a market cap of 286.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $27.79, while CTGO trades at $22.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas CTGO's P/E ratio is 123.37. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to CTGO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is more volatile compared to CTGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.Check CTGO's competition here
SSRM vs USAU Comparison March 2026
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 5.7B. In comparison, USAU has a market cap of 275.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $27.79, while USAU trades at $17.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas USAU's P/E ratio is -10.01. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to USAU's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM and USAU have similar daily volatility (5.68).Check USAU's competition here
SSRM vs VGZ Comparison March 2026
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 5.7B. In comparison, VGZ has a market cap of 262.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $27.79, while VGZ trades at $2.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas VGZ's P/E ratio is -29.50. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to VGZ's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is more volatile compared to VGZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.Check VGZ's competition here
SSRM vs MINE Comparison March 2026
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 5.7B. In comparison, MINE has a market cap of 229.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $27.79, while MINE trades at $3.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas MINE's P/E ratio is -28.67. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to MINE's ROE of -0.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is more volatile compared to MINE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.Check MINE's competition here
SSRM vs PZG Comparison March 2026
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 5.7B. In comparison, PZG has a market cap of 174.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $27.79, while PZG trades at $2.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas PZG's P/E ratio is -10.95. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PZG's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is more volatile compared to PZG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.Check PZG's competition here
SSRM vs GORO Comparison March 2026
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 5.7B. In comparison, GORO has a market cap of 160.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $27.79, while GORO trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas GORO's P/E ratio is -4.43. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GORO's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is less volatile compared to GORO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.Check GORO's competition here
SSRM vs GSV Comparison March 2026
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 5.7B. In comparison, GSV has a market cap of 156M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $27.79, while GSV trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas GSV's P/E ratio is -19.14. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GSV's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is less volatile compared to GSV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.Check GSV's competition here
SSRM vs NAMM Comparison March 2026
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 5.7B. In comparison, NAMM has a market cap of 144.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $27.79, while NAMM trades at $2.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas NAMM's P/E ratio is -8.15. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NAMM's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is less volatile compared to NAMM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.Check NAMM's competition here
SSRM vs BGL Comparison March 2026
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 5.7B. In comparison, BGL has a market cap of 52.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $27.79, while BGL trades at $1.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas BGL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BGL's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is less volatile compared to BGL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.Check BGL's competition here
SSRM vs ODVWZ Comparison March 2026
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 5.7B. In comparison, ODVWZ has a market cap of 33.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $27.79, while ODVWZ trades at $0.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas ODVWZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to ODVWZ's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is more volatile compared to ODVWZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.Check ODVWZ's competition here
SSRM vs AAU Comparison March 2026
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 5.7B. In comparison, AAU has a market cap of 20.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $27.79, while AAU trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas AAU's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AAU's ROE of -1.66%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is more volatile compared to AAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.Check AAU's competition here
SSRM vs AUST Comparison March 2026
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 5.7B. In comparison, AUST has a market cap of 18.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $27.79, while AUST trades at $1.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas AUST's P/E ratio is -11.44. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to AUST's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is more volatile compared to AUST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.Check AUST's competition here
SSRM vs NAMMW Comparison March 2026
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 5.7B. In comparison, NAMMW has a market cap of 9.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $27.79, while NAMMW trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas NAMMW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to NAMMW's ROE of +0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is less volatile compared to NAMMW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.Check NAMMW's competition here
SSRM vs BGLWW Comparison March 2026
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 5.7B. In comparison, BGLWW has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $27.79, while BGLWW trades at $0.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas BGLWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to BGLWW's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is more volatile compared to BGLWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.Check BGLWW's competition here
SSRM vs HYMCZ Comparison March 2026
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 5.7B. In comparison, HYMCZ has a market cap of 1.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $27.79, while HYMCZ trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas HYMCZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HYMCZ's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is less volatile compared to HYMCZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.Check HYMCZ's competition here
SSRM vs HYMCL Comparison March 2026
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 5.7B. In comparison, HYMCL has a market cap of 78.3K. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $27.79, while HYMCL trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas HYMCL's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HYMCL's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is less volatile compared to HYMCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.Check HYMCL's competition here
SSRM vs HYMCW Comparison March 2026
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 5.7B. In comparison, HYMCW has a market cap of 5K. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $27.79, while HYMCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas HYMCW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to HYMCW's ROE of -0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is less volatile compared to HYMCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.Check HYMCW's competition here
SSRM vs KL Comparison March 2026
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 5.7B. In comparison, KL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $27.79, while KL trades at $38.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas KL's P/E ratio is 11.70. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to KL's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is more volatile compared to KL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.Check KL's competition here
SSRM vs PVG Comparison March 2026
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 5.7B. In comparison, PVG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $27.79, while PVG trades at $15.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas PVG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to PVG's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is more volatile compared to PVG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.Check PVG's competition here
SSRM vs GPL Comparison March 2026
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 5.7B. In comparison, GPL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $27.79, while GPL trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 15.23, whereas GPL's P/E ratio is -1.38. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.12%, compared to GPL's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is less volatile compared to GPL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.Check GPL's competition here