SSR Mining Inc.
SSR Mining Inc. SSRM Peers
See (SSRM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Gold Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SSRM | $10.74 | -1.83% | 2.18B | 26.20 | $0.41 | N/A |
| NEM | $50.09 | +0.50% | 55.75B | 11.41 | $4.39 | +2.00% |
| AEM | $106.46 | -0.05% | 53.82B | 22.65 | $4.70 | +1.51% |
| WPM | $78.51 | -0.33% | 35.62B | 57.73 | $1.36 | +0.80% |
| GOLD | $17.88 | -0.42% | 30.74B | 14.65 | $1.22 | +2.24% |
| FNV | $159.27 | +0.14% | 30.67B | 49.62 | $3.21 | +0.92% |
| AU | $40.73 | +0.69% | 20.51B | 18.68 | $2.18 | +2.25% |
| GFI | $20.65 | -0.70% | 18.48B | 14.96 | $1.38 | +2.64% |
| KGC | $13.71 | -0.29% | 16.87B | 13.99 | $0.98 | +0.87% |
| RGLD | $171.14 | +1.09% | 11.26B | 28.33 | $6.04 | +1.00% |
Stock Comparison
SSRM vs NEM Comparison
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 2.18B. In comparison, NEM has a market cap of 55.75B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $10.74, while NEM trades at $50.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.20, whereas NEM's P/E ratio is 11.41. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NEM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is less volatile compared to NEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.
SSRM vs AEM Comparison
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 2.18B. In comparison, AEM has a market cap of 53.82B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $10.74, while AEM trades at $106.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.20, whereas AEM's P/E ratio is 22.65. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AEM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is less volatile compared to AEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.
SSRM vs WPM Comparison
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 2.18B. In comparison, WPM has a market cap of 35.62B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $10.74, while WPM trades at $78.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.20, whereas WPM's P/E ratio is 57.73. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to WPM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is less volatile compared to WPM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.
SSRM vs GOLD Comparison
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 2.18B. In comparison, GOLD has a market cap of 30.74B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $10.74, while GOLD trades at $17.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.20, whereas GOLD's P/E ratio is 14.65. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GOLD's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is less volatile compared to GOLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.
SSRM vs FNV Comparison
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 2.18B. In comparison, FNV has a market cap of 30.67B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $10.74, while FNV trades at $159.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.20, whereas FNV's P/E ratio is 49.62. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to FNV's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is less volatile compared to FNV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.
SSRM vs AU Comparison
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 2.18B. In comparison, AU has a market cap of 20.51B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $10.74, while AU trades at $40.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.20, whereas AU's P/E ratio is 18.68. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AU's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is less volatile compared to AU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.
SSRM vs GFI Comparison
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 2.18B. In comparison, GFI has a market cap of 18.48B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $10.74, while GFI trades at $20.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.20, whereas GFI's P/E ratio is 14.96. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GFI's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is less volatile compared to GFI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.
SSRM vs KGC Comparison
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 2.18B. In comparison, KGC has a market cap of 16.87B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $10.74, while KGC trades at $13.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.20, whereas KGC's P/E ratio is 13.99. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to KGC's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is less volatile compared to KGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.
SSRM vs RGLD Comparison
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 2.18B. In comparison, RGLD has a market cap of 11.26B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $10.74, while RGLD trades at $171.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.20, whereas RGLD's P/E ratio is 28.33. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to RGLD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is less volatile compared to RGLD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.
SSRM vs AGI Comparison
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 2.18B. In comparison, AGI has a market cap of 10.31B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $10.74, while AGI trades at $24.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.20, whereas AGI's P/E ratio is 39.53. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AGI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is less volatile compared to AGI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.
SSRM vs HMY Comparison
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 2.18B. In comparison, HMY has a market cap of 8.99B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $10.74, while HMY trades at $14.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.20, whereas HMY's P/E ratio is 15.88. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HMY's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is less volatile compared to HMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.
SSRM vs AUY Comparison
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 2.18B. In comparison, AUY has a market cap of 5.63B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $10.74, while AUY trades at $5.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.20, whereas AUY's P/E ratio is -5.79. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AUY's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is less volatile compared to AUY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.
SSRM vs CDE Comparison
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 2.18B. In comparison, CDE has a market cap of 4.78B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $10.74, while CDE trades at $7.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.20, whereas CDE's P/E ratio is 25.74. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CDE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is less volatile compared to CDE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.
SSRM vs OR Comparison
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 2.18B. In comparison, OR has a market cap of 4.38B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $10.74, while OR trades at $23.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.20, whereas OR's P/E ratio is 259.33. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to OR's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is less volatile compared to OR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.
SSRM vs BTG Comparison
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 2.18B. In comparison, BTG has a market cap of 3.88B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $10.74, while BTG trades at $2.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.20, whereas BTG's P/E ratio is -6.26. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to BTG's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is less volatile compared to BTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.
SSRM vs EGO Comparison
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 2.18B. In comparison, EGO has a market cap of 3.67B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $10.74, while EGO trades at $17.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.20, whereas EGO's P/E ratio is 10.89. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EGO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is less volatile compared to EGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.
SSRM vs IAG Comparison
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 2.18B. In comparison, IAG has a market cap of 3.62B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $10.74, while IAG trades at $6.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.20, whereas IAG's P/E ratio is 4.32. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IAG's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is less volatile compared to IAG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.
SSRM vs SBSW Comparison
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 2.18B. In comparison, SBSW has a market cap of 3.42B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $10.74, while SBSW trades at $4.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.20, whereas SBSW's P/E ratio is -8.47. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SBSW's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is less volatile compared to SBSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.
SSRM vs HL-PB Comparison
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 2.18B. In comparison, HL-PB has a market cap of 3.18B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $10.74, while HL-PB trades at $52.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.20, whereas HL-PB's P/E ratio is 1766.33. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HL-PB's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is more volatile compared to HL-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.
SSRM vs HL Comparison
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 2.18B. In comparison, HL has a market cap of 3.09B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $10.74, while HL trades at $4.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.20, whereas HL's P/E ratio is 40.71. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is less volatile compared to HL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.
SSRM vs NGD Comparison
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 2.18B. In comparison, NGD has a market cap of 2.98B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $10.74, while NGD trades at $3.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.20, whereas NGD's P/E ratio is 20.93. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NGD's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is less volatile compared to NGD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.
SSRM vs ORLA Comparison
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 2.18B. In comparison, ORLA has a market cap of 2.93B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $10.74, while ORLA trades at $9.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.20, whereas ORLA's P/E ratio is 33.69. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ORLA's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is less volatile compared to ORLA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.
SSRM vs EQX Comparison
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 2.18B. In comparison, EQX has a market cap of 2.72B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $10.74, while EQX trades at $5.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.20, whereas EQX's P/E ratio is 8.40. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to EQX's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM and EQX have similar daily volatility (2.03).
SSRM vs SAND Comparison
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 2.18B. In comparison, SAND has a market cap of 2.41B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $10.74, while SAND trades at $8.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.20, whereas SAND's P/E ratio is 82.10. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SAND's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is less volatile compared to SAND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.
SSRM vs NVAWW Comparison
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 2.18B. In comparison, NVAWW has a market cap of 1.63B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $10.74, while NVAWW trades at $6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.20, whereas NVAWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NVAWW's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is less volatile compared to NVAWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.
SSRM vs NG Comparison
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 2.18B. In comparison, NG has a market cap of 1.38B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $10.74, while NG trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.20, whereas NG's P/E ratio is -25.75. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NG's ROE of +1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is less volatile compared to NG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.
SSRM vs CGAU Comparison
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 2.18B. In comparison, CGAU has a market cap of 1.36B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $10.74, while CGAU trades at $6.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.20, whereas CGAU's P/E ratio is 36.00. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CGAU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is less volatile compared to CGAU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.
SSRM vs DRD Comparison
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 2.18B. In comparison, DRD has a market cap of 1.22B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $10.74, while DRD trades at $14.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.20, whereas DRD's P/E ratio is 13.09. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DRD's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is more volatile compared to DRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.
SSRM vs SA Comparison
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 2.18B. In comparison, SA has a market cap of 1.14B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $10.74, while SA trades at $11.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.20, whereas SA's P/E ratio is -45.56. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to SA's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is less volatile compared to SA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.
SSRM vs ARMN Comparison
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 2.18B. In comparison, ARMN has a market cap of 1.01B. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $10.74, while ARMN trades at $5.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.20, whereas ARMN's P/E ratio is 35.34. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ARMN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is less volatile compared to ARMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.
SSRM vs CNL Comparison
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 2.18B. In comparison, CNL has a market cap of 819.60M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $10.74, while CNL trades at $9.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.20, whereas CNL's P/E ratio is -28.41. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CNL's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is less volatile compared to CNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.
SSRM vs GSS Comparison
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 2.18B. In comparison, GSS has a market cap of 451.33M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $10.74, while GSS trades at $3.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.20, whereas GSS's P/E ratio is -48.75. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GSS's ROE of +1.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is more volatile compared to GSS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.
SSRM vs GAU Comparison
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 2.18B. In comparison, GAU has a market cap of 331.74M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $10.74, while GAU trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.20, whereas GAU's P/E ratio is 64.50. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GAU's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is less volatile compared to GAU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.
SSRM vs DC Comparison
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 2.18B. In comparison, DC has a market cap of 320.00M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $10.74, while DC trades at $2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.20, whereas DC's P/E ratio is -9.23. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DC's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is less volatile compared to DC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.
SSRM vs CMCL Comparison
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 2.18B. In comparison, CMCL has a market cap of 295.02M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $10.74, while CMCL trades at $15.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.20, whereas CMCL's P/E ratio is 16.80. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CMCL's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is less volatile compared to CMCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.
SSRM vs ODV Comparison
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 2.18B. In comparison, ODV has a market cap of 243.85M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $10.74, while ODV trades at $1.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.20, whereas ODV's P/E ratio is -2.26. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ODV's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is less volatile compared to ODV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.
SSRM vs NFGC Comparison
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 2.18B. In comparison, NFGC has a market cap of 238.72M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $10.74, while NFGC trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.20, whereas NFGC's P/E ratio is -6.26. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to NFGC's ROE of -0.72%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is less volatile compared to NFGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.
SSRM vs IAUX Comparison
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 2.18B. In comparison, IAUX has a market cap of 224.87M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $10.74, while IAUX trades at $0.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.20, whereas IAUX's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IAUX's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is less volatile compared to IAUX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.
SSRM vs CTGO Comparison
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 2.18B. In comparison, CTGO has a market cap of 186.96M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $10.74, while CTGO trades at $14.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.20, whereas CTGO's P/E ratio is -4.27. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to CTGO's ROE of +2.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is less volatile compared to CTGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.
SSRM vs IDR Comparison
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 2.18B. In comparison, IDR has a market cap of 177.21M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $10.74, while IDR trades at $12.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.20, whereas IDR's P/E ratio is 20.34. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to IDR's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is more volatile compared to IDR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.
SSRM vs GSV Comparison
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 2.18B. In comparison, GSV has a market cap of 155.95M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $10.74, while GSV trades at $0.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.20, whereas GSV's P/E ratio is -19.14. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GSV's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is less volatile compared to GSV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.
SSRM vs GLDG Comparison
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 2.18B. In comparison, GLDG has a market cap of 148.74M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $10.74, while GLDG trades at $0.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.20, whereas GLDG's P/E ratio is -7.59. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GLDG's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is more volatile compared to GLDG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.
SSRM vs THM Comparison
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 2.18B. In comparison, THM has a market cap of 136.00M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $10.74, while THM trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.20, whereas THM's P/E ratio is -32.71. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to THM's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is less volatile compared to THM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.
SSRM vs USAU Comparison
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 2.18B. In comparison, USAU has a market cap of 130.23M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $10.74, while USAU trades at $10.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.20, whereas USAU's P/E ratio is -7.49. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to USAU's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is more volatile compared to USAU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.
SSRM vs VGZ Comparison
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 2.18B. In comparison, VGZ has a market cap of 119.95M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $10.74, while VGZ trades at $0.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.20, whereas VGZ's P/E ratio is 12.01. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to VGZ's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is less volatile compared to VGZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.
SSRM vs DC-WT Comparison
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 2.18B. In comparison, DC-WT has a market cap of 93.88M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $10.74, while DC-WT trades at $0.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.20, whereas DC-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to DC-WT's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is more volatile compared to DC-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.
SSRM vs GORO Comparison
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 2.18B. In comparison, GORO has a market cap of 87.27M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $10.74, while GORO trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.20, whereas GORO's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to GORO's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is less volatile compared to GORO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.
SSRM vs TRX Comparison
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 2.18B. In comparison, TRX has a market cap of 85.67M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $10.74, while TRX trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.20, whereas TRX's P/E ratio is -30.37. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to TRX's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is less volatile compared to TRX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.
SSRM vs HYMC Comparison
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 2.18B. In comparison, HYMC has a market cap of 72.45M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $10.74, while HYMC trades at $2.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.20, whereas HYMC's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HYMC's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is less volatile compared to HYMC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.
SSRM vs PZG Comparison
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 2.18B. In comparison, PZG has a market cap of 33.95M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $10.74, while PZG trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.20, whereas PZG's P/E ratio is -3.96. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to PZG's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is less volatile compared to PZG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.
SSRM vs ODVWZ Comparison
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 2.18B. In comparison, ODVWZ has a market cap of 21.96M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $10.74, while ODVWZ trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.20, whereas ODVWZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to ODVWZ's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is less volatile compared to ODVWZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.
SSRM vs AAU Comparison
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 2.18B. In comparison, AAU has a market cap of 20.10M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $10.74, while AAU trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.20, whereas AAU's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AAU's ROE of -11.79%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is less volatile compared to AAU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.
SSRM vs AUST Comparison
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 2.18B. In comparison, AUST has a market cap of 16.32M. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $10.74, while AUST trades at $1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.20, whereas AUST's P/E ratio is -5.86. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to AUST's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is less volatile compared to AUST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.
SSRM vs HYMCL Comparison
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 2.18B. In comparison, HYMCL has a market cap of 414724.00. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $10.74, while HYMCL trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.20, whereas HYMCL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HYMCL's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is less volatile compared to HYMCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.
SSRM vs HYMCW Comparison
SSRM plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSRM stands at 2.18B. In comparison, HYMCW has a market cap of 34977.00. Regarding current trading prices, SSRM is priced at $10.74, while HYMCW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSRM currently has a P/E ratio of 26.20, whereas HYMCW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSRM's ROE is +0.03%, compared to HYMCW's ROE of +1.87%. Regarding short-term risk, SSRM is less volatile compared to HYMCW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSRM.