SSAB AB (publ)
SSAB AB (publ) SSAAF Peers
See (SSAAF) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Steel Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SSAAF | $6.69 | N/A | 6.63B | 12.87 | $0.52 | +4.01% |
| TATLY | $9.25 | N/A | 115.47B | -185.00 | -$0.05 | +4.63% |
| VLOWY | $3.93 | -5.42% | 22.99B | 9.35 | $0.42 | N/A |
| NISTF | $20.00 | -9.50% | 20.90B | 8.85 | $2.26 | +0.03% |
| AMSYF | $27.00 | N/A | 20.75B | 17.20 | $1.57 | +1.86% |
| NPSCY | $6.58 | +1.62% | 20.62B | 8.54 | $0.77 | +1.85% |
| SVJTY | $21.90 | +119.00% | 18.35B | 4.49 | $4.88 | +23.86% |
| CISXF | $19.87 | +33.36% | 15.15B | 141.93 | $0.14 | +0.04% |
| HMTLY | $265.75 | N/A | 11.36B | 31.23 | $8.51 | N/A |
| JFEEF | $13.06 | N/A | 8.31B | 14.04 | $0.93 | +0.04% |
Stock Comparison
SSAAF vs TATLY Comparison
SSAAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSAAF stands at 6.63B. In comparison, TATLY has a market cap of 115.47B. Regarding current trading prices, SSAAF is priced at $6.69, while TATLY trades at $9.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.87, whereas TATLY's P/E ratio is -185.00. In terms of profitability, SSAAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TATLY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SSAAF is more volatile compared to TATLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSAAF.
SSAAF vs VLOWY Comparison
SSAAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSAAF stands at 6.63B. In comparison, VLOWY has a market cap of 22.99B. Regarding current trading prices, SSAAF is priced at $6.69, while VLOWY trades at $3.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.87, whereas VLOWY's P/E ratio is 9.35. In terms of profitability, SSAAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VLOWY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SSAAF is less volatile compared to VLOWY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSAAF.
SSAAF vs NISTF Comparison
SSAAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSAAF stands at 6.63B. In comparison, NISTF has a market cap of 20.90B. Regarding current trading prices, SSAAF is priced at $6.69, while NISTF trades at $20.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.87, whereas NISTF's P/E ratio is 8.85. In terms of profitability, SSAAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NISTF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SSAAF is more volatile compared to NISTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSAAF.
SSAAF vs AMSYF Comparison
SSAAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSAAF stands at 6.63B. In comparison, AMSYF has a market cap of 20.75B. Regarding current trading prices, SSAAF is priced at $6.69, while AMSYF trades at $27.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.87, whereas AMSYF's P/E ratio is 17.20. In terms of profitability, SSAAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AMSYF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SSAAF is less volatile compared to AMSYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSAAF.
SSAAF vs NPSCY Comparison
SSAAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSAAF stands at 6.63B. In comparison, NPSCY has a market cap of 20.62B. Regarding current trading prices, SSAAF is priced at $6.69, while NPSCY trades at $6.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.87, whereas NPSCY's P/E ratio is 8.54. In terms of profitability, SSAAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NPSCY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SSAAF is less volatile compared to NPSCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSAAF.
SSAAF vs SVJTY Comparison
SSAAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSAAF stands at 6.63B. In comparison, SVJTY has a market cap of 18.35B. Regarding current trading prices, SSAAF is priced at $6.69, while SVJTY trades at $21.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.87, whereas SVJTY's P/E ratio is 4.49. In terms of profitability, SSAAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SVJTY's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SSAAF is less volatile compared to SVJTY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSAAF.
SSAAF vs CISXF Comparison
SSAAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSAAF stands at 6.63B. In comparison, CISXF has a market cap of 15.15B. Regarding current trading prices, SSAAF is priced at $6.69, while CISXF trades at $19.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.87, whereas CISXF's P/E ratio is 141.93. In terms of profitability, SSAAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CISXF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SSAAF is more volatile compared to CISXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSAAF.
SSAAF vs HMTLY Comparison
SSAAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSAAF stands at 6.63B. In comparison, HMTLY has a market cap of 11.36B. Regarding current trading prices, SSAAF is priced at $6.69, while HMTLY trades at $265.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.87, whereas HMTLY's P/E ratio is 31.23. In terms of profitability, SSAAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to HMTLY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SSAAF is more volatile compared to HMTLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSAAF.
SSAAF vs JFEEF Comparison
SSAAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSAAF stands at 6.63B. In comparison, JFEEF has a market cap of 8.31B. Regarding current trading prices, SSAAF is priced at $6.69, while JFEEF trades at $13.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.87, whereas JFEEF's P/E ratio is 14.04. In terms of profitability, SSAAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JFEEF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SSAAF is less volatile compared to JFEEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSAAF.
SSAAF vs BLSFY Comparison
SSAAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSAAF stands at 6.63B. In comparison, BLSFY has a market cap of 6.98B. Regarding current trading prices, SSAAF is priced at $6.69, while BLSFY trades at $78.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.87, whereas BLSFY's P/E ratio is 20.01. In terms of profitability, SSAAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BLSFY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SSAAF is less volatile compared to BLSFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSAAF.
SSAAF vs KUMBF Comparison
SSAAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSAAF stands at 6.63B. In comparison, KUMBF has a market cap of 6.39B. Regarding current trading prices, SSAAF is priced at $6.69, while KUMBF trades at $19.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.87, whereas KUMBF's P/E ratio is 8.12. In terms of profitability, SSAAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KUMBF's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SSAAF is less volatile compared to KUMBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSAAF.
SSAAF vs BLSFF Comparison
SSAAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSAAF stands at 6.63B. In comparison, BLSFF has a market cap of 6.36B. Regarding current trading prices, SSAAF is priced at $6.69, while BLSFF trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.87, whereas BLSFF's P/E ratio is 18.59. In terms of profitability, SSAAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BLSFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SSAAF is less volatile compared to BLSFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSAAF.
SSAAF vs SSAAY Comparison
SSAAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSAAF stands at 6.63B. In comparison, SSAAY has a market cap of 6.02B. Regarding current trading prices, SSAAF is priced at $6.69, while SSAAY trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.87, whereas SSAAY's P/E ratio is 9.11. In terms of profitability, SSAAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SSAAY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SSAAF is more volatile compared to SSAAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSAAF.
SSAAF vs KIROY Comparison
SSAAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSAAF stands at 6.63B. In comparison, KIROY has a market cap of 5.67B. Regarding current trading prices, SSAAF is priced at $6.69, while KIROY trades at $5.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.87, whereas KIROY's P/E ratio is 7.01. In terms of profitability, SSAAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KIROY's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SSAAF is more volatile compared to KIROY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSAAF.
SSAAF vs KBSTF Comparison
SSAAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSAAF stands at 6.63B. In comparison, KBSTF has a market cap of 5.45B. Regarding current trading prices, SSAAF is priced at $6.69, while KBSTF trades at $13.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.87, whereas KBSTF's P/E ratio is 6.60. In terms of profitability, SSAAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KBSTF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SSAAF is less volatile compared to KBSTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSAAF.
SSAAF vs VLOUF Comparison
SSAAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSAAF stands at 6.63B. In comparison, VLOUF has a market cap of 4.35B. Regarding current trading prices, SSAAF is priced at $6.69, while VLOUF trades at $18.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.87, whereas VLOUF's P/E ratio is 8.89. In terms of profitability, SSAAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VLOUF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SSAAF is more volatile compared to VLOUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSAAF.
SSAAF vs ICHBF Comparison
SSAAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSAAF stands at 6.63B. In comparison, ICHBF has a market cap of 4.33B. Regarding current trading prices, SSAAF is priced at $6.69, while ICHBF trades at $9.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.87, whereas ICHBF's P/E ratio is 5.84. In terms of profitability, SSAAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ICHBF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SSAAF is more volatile compared to ICHBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSAAF.
SSAAF vs VLPNF Comparison
SSAAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSAAF stands at 6.63B. In comparison, VLPNF has a market cap of 3.76B. Regarding current trading prices, SSAAF is priced at $6.69, while VLPNF trades at $21.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.87, whereas VLPNF's P/E ratio is -78.32. In terms of profitability, SSAAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VLPNF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SSAAF is less volatile compared to VLPNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSAAF.
SSAAF vs YMTKF Comparison
SSAAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSAAF stands at 6.63B. In comparison, YMTKF has a market cap of 3.14B. Regarding current trading prices, SSAAF is priced at $6.69, while YMTKF trades at $50.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.87, whereas YMTKF's P/E ratio is 14.61. In terms of profitability, SSAAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to YMTKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SSAAF is more volatile compared to YMTKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSAAF.
SSAAF vs MAANF Comparison
SSAAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSAAF stands at 6.63B. In comparison, MAANF has a market cap of 2.98B. Regarding current trading prices, SSAAF is priced at $6.69, while MAANF trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.87, whereas MAANF's P/E ratio is -2.69. In terms of profitability, SSAAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MAANF's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SSAAF is less volatile compared to MAANF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSAAF.
SSAAF vs OUTKY Comparison
SSAAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSAAF stands at 6.63B. In comparison, OUTKY has a market cap of 2.94B. Regarding current trading prices, SSAAF is priced at $6.69, while OUTKY trades at $1.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.87, whereas OUTKY's P/E ratio is -34.60. In terms of profitability, SSAAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OUTKY's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SSAAF is more volatile compared to OUTKY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSAAF.
SSAAF vs ANIOY Comparison
SSAAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSAAF stands at 6.63B. In comparison, ANIOY has a market cap of 2.79B. Regarding current trading prices, SSAAF is priced at $6.69, while ANIOY trades at $5.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.87, whereas ANIOY's P/E ratio is 11.20. In terms of profitability, SSAAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ANIOY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SSAAF is less volatile compared to ANIOY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSAAF.
SSAAF vs STZHF Comparison
SSAAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSAAF stands at 6.63B. In comparison, STZHF has a market cap of 2.69B. Regarding current trading prices, SSAAF is priced at $6.69, while STZHF trades at $49.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.87, whereas STZHF's P/E ratio is 21.86. In terms of profitability, SSAAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to STZHF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SSAAF is more volatile compared to STZHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSAAF.
SSAAF vs APMSF Comparison
SSAAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSAAF stands at 6.63B. In comparison, APMSF has a market cap of 2.20B. Regarding current trading prices, SSAAF is priced at $6.69, while APMSF trades at $30.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.87, whereas APMSF's P/E ratio is 8.52. In terms of profitability, SSAAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to APMSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SSAAF is more volatile compared to APMSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSAAF.
SSAAF vs ANGGF Comparison
SSAAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSAAF stands at 6.63B. In comparison, ANGGF has a market cap of 2.18B. Regarding current trading prices, SSAAF is priced at $6.69, while ANGGF trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.87, whereas ANGGF's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, SSAAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ANGGF's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SSAAF is more volatile compared to ANGGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSAAF.
SSAAF vs APEMY Comparison
SSAAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSAAF stands at 6.63B. In comparison, APEMY has a market cap of 2.18B. Regarding current trading prices, SSAAF is priced at $6.69, while APEMY trades at $30.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.87, whereas APEMY's P/E ratio is 8.41. In terms of profitability, SSAAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to APEMY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SSAAF is less volatile compared to APEMY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSAAF.
SSAAF vs SMSMY Comparison
SSAAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSAAF stands at 6.63B. In comparison, SMSMY has a market cap of 1.98B. Regarding current trading prices, SSAAF is priced at $6.69, while SMSMY trades at $10.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.87, whereas SMSMY's P/E ratio is -93.18. In terms of profitability, SSAAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SMSMY's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SSAAF is more volatile compared to SMSMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSAAF.
SSAAF vs EVRZF Comparison
SSAAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSAAF stands at 6.63B. In comparison, EVRZF has a market cap of 1.78B. Regarding current trading prices, SSAAF is priced at $6.69, while EVRZF trades at $1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.87, whereas EVRZF's P/E ratio is 0.51. In terms of profitability, SSAAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EVRZF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SSAAF is more volatile compared to EVRZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSAAF.
SSAAF vs MCHIF Comparison
SSAAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSAAF stands at 6.63B. In comparison, MCHIF has a market cap of 1.69B. Regarding current trading prices, SSAAF is priced at $6.69, while MCHIF trades at $21.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.87, whereas MCHIF's P/E ratio is 15.55. In terms of profitability, SSAAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MCHIF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SSAAF is more volatile compared to MCHIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSAAF.
SSAAF vs SMUPF Comparison
SSAAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSAAF stands at 6.63B. In comparison, SMUPF has a market cap of 1.67B. Regarding current trading prices, SSAAF is priced at $6.69, while SMUPF trades at $8.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.87, whereas SMUPF's P/E ratio is -78.64. In terms of profitability, SSAAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SMUPF's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SSAAF is less volatile compared to SMUPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSAAF.
SSAAF vs CIAFF Comparison
SSAAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSAAF stands at 6.63B. In comparison, CIAFF has a market cap of 1.61B. Regarding current trading prices, SSAAF is priced at $6.69, while CIAFF trades at $3.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.87, whereas CIAFF's P/E ratio is 18.28. In terms of profitability, SSAAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CIAFF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SSAAF is less volatile compared to CIAFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSAAF.
SSAAF vs CKSNF Comparison
SSAAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSAAF stands at 6.63B. In comparison, CKSNF has a market cap of 1.39B. Regarding current trading prices, SSAAF is priced at $6.69, while CKSNF trades at $5.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.87, whereas CKSNF's P/E ratio is 12.93. In terms of profitability, SSAAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CKSNF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SSAAF is less volatile compared to CKSNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSAAF.
SSAAF vs OUTFF Comparison
SSAAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSAAF stands at 6.63B. In comparison, OUTFF has a market cap of 1.36B. Regarding current trading prices, SSAAF is priced at $6.69, while OUTFF trades at $3.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.87, whereas OUTFF's P/E ratio is -30.10. In terms of profitability, SSAAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OUTFF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SSAAF is less volatile compared to OUTFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSAAF.
SSAAF vs LIFZF Comparison
SSAAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSAAF stands at 6.63B. In comparison, LIFZF has a market cap of 1.28B. Regarding current trading prices, SSAAF is priced at $6.69, while LIFZF trades at $20.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.87, whereas LIFZF's P/E ratio is 10.45. In terms of profitability, SSAAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to LIFZF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SSAAF is more volatile compared to LIFZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSAAF.
SSAAF vs CKSNY Comparison
SSAAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSAAF stands at 6.63B. In comparison, CKSNY has a market cap of 1.27B. Regarding current trading prices, SSAAF is priced at $6.69, while CKSNY trades at $5.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.87, whereas CKSNY's P/E ratio is 7.26. In terms of profitability, SSAAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CKSNY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SSAAF is more volatile compared to CKSNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSAAF.
SSAAF vs SZGPY Comparison
SSAAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSAAF stands at 6.63B. In comparison, SZGPY has a market cap of 1.22B. Regarding current trading prices, SSAAF is priced at $6.69, while SZGPY trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.87, whereas SZGPY's P/E ratio is -6.08. In terms of profitability, SSAAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SZGPY's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SSAAF is less volatile compared to SZGPY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSAAF.
SSAAF vs USNZY Comparison
SSAAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSAAF stands at 6.63B. In comparison, USNZY has a market cap of 1.20B. Regarding current trading prices, SSAAF is priced at $6.69, while USNZY trades at $0.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.87, whereas USNZY's P/E ratio is 24.25. In terms of profitability, SSAAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to USNZY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SSAAF is less volatile compared to USNZY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSAAF.
SSAAF vs CUGCF Comparison
SSAAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSAAF stands at 6.63B. In comparison, CUGCF has a market cap of 1.17B. Regarding current trading prices, SSAAF is priced at $6.69, while CUGCF trades at $0.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.87, whereas CUGCF's P/E ratio is 31.50. In terms of profitability, SSAAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CUGCF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SSAAF is less volatile compared to CUGCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSAAF.
SSAAF vs SZGPF Comparison
SSAAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSAAF stands at 6.63B. In comparison, SZGPF has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, SSAAF is priced at $6.69, while SZGPF trades at $20.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.87, whereas SZGPF's P/E ratio is -5.69. In terms of profitability, SSAAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SZGPF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SSAAF is less volatile compared to SZGPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSAAF.
SSAAF vs SYPLF Comparison
SSAAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSAAF stands at 6.63B. In comparison, SYPLF has a market cap of 1.03B. Regarding current trading prices, SSAAF is priced at $6.69, while SYPLF trades at $15.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.87, whereas SYPLF's P/E ratio is 30.37. In terms of profitability, SSAAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SYPLF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SSAAF is less volatile compared to SYPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSAAF.
SSAAF vs VLPNY Comparison
SSAAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSAAF stands at 6.63B. In comparison, VLPNY has a market cap of 898.40M. Regarding current trading prices, SSAAF is priced at $6.69, while VLPNY trades at $5.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.87, whereas VLPNY's P/E ratio is -87.33. In terms of profitability, SSAAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VLPNY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SSAAF is less volatile compared to VLPNY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSAAF.
SSAAF vs ERELY Comparison
SSAAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSAAF stands at 6.63B. In comparison, ERELY has a market cap of 864.43M. Regarding current trading prices, SSAAF is priced at $6.69, while ERELY trades at $6.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.87, whereas ERELY's P/E ratio is 20.09. In terms of profitability, SSAAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ERELY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SSAAF is less volatile compared to ERELY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSAAF.
SSAAF vs KLKNF Comparison
SSAAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSAAF stands at 6.63B. In comparison, KLKNF has a market cap of 827.92M. Regarding current trading prices, SSAAF is priced at $6.69, while KLKNF trades at $8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.87, whereas KLKNF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, SSAAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KLKNF's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SSAAF is more volatile compared to KLKNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSAAF.
SSAAF vs YDWAF Comparison
SSAAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSAAF stands at 6.63B. In comparison, YDWAF has a market cap of 666.25M. Regarding current trading prices, SSAAF is priced at $6.69, while YDWAF trades at $23.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.87, whereas YDWAF's P/E ratio is 10.77. In terms of profitability, SSAAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to YDWAF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SSAAF is more volatile compared to YDWAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSAAF.
SSAAF vs FEEXY Comparison
SSAAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSAAF stands at 6.63B. In comparison, FEEXY has a market cap of 566.31M. Regarding current trading prices, SSAAF is priced at $6.69, while FEEXY trades at $3.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.87, whereas FEEXY's P/E ratio is -11.32. In terms of profitability, SSAAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FEEXY's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SSAAF is less volatile compared to FEEXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSAAF.
SSAAF vs CUGCY Comparison
SSAAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSAAF stands at 6.63B. In comparison, CUGCY has a market cap of 513.71M. Regarding current trading prices, SSAAF is priced at $6.69, while CUGCY trades at $2.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.87, whereas CUGCY's P/E ratio is -11.04. In terms of profitability, SSAAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CUGCY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SSAAF is more volatile compared to CUGCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSAAF.
SSAAF vs FEEXF Comparison
SSAAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSAAF stands at 6.63B. In comparison, FEEXF has a market cap of 499.29M. Regarding current trading prices, SSAAF is priced at $6.69, while FEEXF trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.87, whereas FEEXF's P/E ratio is -9.43. In terms of profitability, SSAAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to FEEXF's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SSAAF is more volatile compared to FEEXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSAAF.
SSAAF vs OSKXF Comparison
SSAAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSAAF stands at 6.63B. In comparison, OSKXF has a market cap of 397.16M. Regarding current trading prices, SSAAF is priced at $6.69, while OSKXF trades at $10.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.87, whereas OSKXF's P/E ratio is 17.59. In terms of profitability, SSAAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to OSKXF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SSAAF is more volatile compared to OSKXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSAAF.
SSAAF vs MTGRY Comparison
SSAAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSAAF stands at 6.63B. In comparison, MTGRY has a market cap of 247.71M. Regarding current trading prices, SSAAF is priced at $6.69, while MTGRY trades at $2.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.87, whereas MTGRY's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, SSAAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MTGRY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SSAAF is less volatile compared to MTGRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSAAF.
SSAAF vs MTGRF Comparison
SSAAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSAAF stands at 6.63B. In comparison, MTGRF has a market cap of 247.71M. Regarding current trading prices, SSAAF is priced at $6.69, while MTGRF trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.87, whereas MTGRF's P/E ratio is -1.91. In terms of profitability, SSAAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MTGRF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SSAAF is less volatile compared to MTGRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSAAF.
SSAAF vs AMSIY Comparison
SSAAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSAAF stands at 6.63B. In comparison, AMSIY has a market cap of 246.53M. Regarding current trading prices, SSAAF is priced at $6.69, while AMSIY trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.87, whereas AMSIY's P/E ratio is 0.47. In terms of profitability, SSAAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AMSIY's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SSAAF is less volatile compared to AMSIY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSAAF.
SSAAF vs GRRLF Comparison
SSAAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSAAF stands at 6.63B. In comparison, GRRLF has a market cap of 162.03M. Regarding current trading prices, SSAAF is priced at $6.69, while GRRLF trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.87, whereas GRRLF's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, SSAAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GRRLF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SSAAF is less volatile compared to GRRLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSAAF.
SSAAF vs WEBC Comparison
SSAAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSAAF stands at 6.63B. In comparison, WEBC has a market cap of 150.41M. Regarding current trading prices, SSAAF is priced at $6.69, while WEBC trades at $185.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.87, whereas WEBC's P/E ratio is 5.57. In terms of profitability, SSAAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WEBC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SSAAF is more volatile compared to WEBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSAAF.
SSAAF vs ARCXF Comparison
SSAAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSAAF stands at 6.63B. In comparison, ARCXF has a market cap of 64.65M. Regarding current trading prices, SSAAF is priced at $6.69, while ARCXF trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.87, whereas ARCXF's P/E ratio is -0.20. In terms of profitability, SSAAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ARCXF's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, SSAAF is less volatile compared to ARCXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSAAF.
SSAAF vs TWIRF Comparison
SSAAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSAAF stands at 6.63B. In comparison, TWIRF has a market cap of 46.05M. Regarding current trading prices, SSAAF is priced at $6.69, while TWIRF trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.87, whereas TWIRF's P/E ratio is -16.09. In terms of profitability, SSAAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TWIRF's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SSAAF is more volatile compared to TWIRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSAAF.
SSAAF vs IRNRF Comparison
SSAAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSAAF stands at 6.63B. In comparison, IRNRF has a market cap of 20.51M. Regarding current trading prices, SSAAF is priced at $6.69, while IRNRF trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.87, whereas IRNRF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSAAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to IRNRF's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SSAAF is less volatile compared to IRNRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSAAF.
SSAAF vs GSIH Comparison
SSAAF plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SSAAF stands at 6.63B. In comparison, GSIH has a market cap of 9203.00. Regarding current trading prices, SSAAF is priced at $6.69, while GSIH trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SSAAF currently has a P/E ratio of 12.87, whereas GSIH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SSAAF's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GSIH's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SSAAF is more volatile compared to GSIH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SSAAF.