SRM Entertainment, Inc.
SRM Entertainment, Inc. SRM Peers
See (SRM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Leisure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRM | $9.19 | +533.79% | 158.5M | -38.29 | -$0.24 | N/A |
| CCL | $23.85 | +6.40% | 31B | 15.38 | $1.55 | N/A |
| CUK | $21.55 | +6.26% | 30.4B | 13.90 | $1.55 | N/A |
| AS | $37.15 | +2.51% | 20.6B | 100.41 | $0.37 | N/A |
| HAS | $69.77 | +2.89% | 9.8B | 22.65 | $3.08 | +4.02% |
| PLNT | $104.98 | +2.30% | 8.8B | 49.75 | $2.11 | N/A |
| MAT | $19.33 | +2.82% | 6.2B | 12.55 | $1.54 | N/A |
| LTH | $27.18 | +0.15% | 6B | 28.31 | $0.96 | N/A |
| GOLF | $72.27 | +3.33% | 4.2B | 19.85 | $3.64 | +1.25% |
| ELY | $21.33 | -2.82% | 4B | 41.82 | $0.51 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SRM vs CCL Comparison
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 158.5M. In comparison, CCL has a market cap of 31B. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $9.19, while CCL trades at $23.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -38.29, whereas CCL's P/E ratio is 15.38. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to CCL's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to CCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.
SRM vs CUK Comparison
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 158.5M. In comparison, CUK has a market cap of 30.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $9.19, while CUK trades at $21.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -38.29, whereas CUK's P/E ratio is 13.90. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to CUK's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to CUK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.
SRM vs AS Comparison
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 158.5M. In comparison, AS has a market cap of 20.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $9.19, while AS trades at $37.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -38.29, whereas AS's P/E ratio is 100.41. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to AS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.
SRM vs HAS Comparison
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 158.5M. In comparison, HAS has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $9.19, while HAS trades at $69.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -38.29, whereas HAS's P/E ratio is 22.65. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to HAS's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to HAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.
SRM vs PLNT Comparison
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 158.5M. In comparison, PLNT has a market cap of 8.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $9.19, while PLNT trades at $104.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -38.29, whereas PLNT's P/E ratio is 49.75. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to PLNT's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to PLNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.
SRM vs MAT Comparison
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 158.5M. In comparison, MAT has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $9.19, while MAT trades at $19.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -38.29, whereas MAT's P/E ratio is 12.55. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to MAT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to MAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.
SRM vs LTH Comparison
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 158.5M. In comparison, LTH has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $9.19, while LTH trades at $27.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -38.29, whereas LTH's P/E ratio is 28.31. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to LTH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to LTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.
SRM vs GOLF Comparison
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 158.5M. In comparison, GOLF has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $9.19, while GOLF trades at $72.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -38.29, whereas GOLF's P/E ratio is 19.85. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to GOLF's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to GOLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.
SRM vs ELY Comparison
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 158.5M. In comparison, ELY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $9.19, while ELY trades at $21.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -38.29, whereas ELY's P/E ratio is 41.82. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to ELY's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to ELY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.
SRM vs SEAS Comparison
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 158.5M. In comparison, SEAS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $9.19, while SEAS trades at $50.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -38.29, whereas SEAS's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to SEAS's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to SEAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.
SRM vs FUN Comparison
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 158.5M. In comparison, FUN has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $9.19, while FUN trades at $29.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -38.29, whereas FUN's P/E ratio is -10.57. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to FUN's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to FUN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.
SRM vs SIX Comparison
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 158.5M. In comparison, SIX has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $9.19, while SIX trades at $32.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -38.29, whereas SIX's P/E ratio is 100.00. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to SIX's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to SIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.
SRM vs PTON Comparison
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 158.5M. In comparison, PTON has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $9.19, while PTON trades at $6.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -38.29, whereas PTON's P/E ratio is -16.12. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to PTON's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to PTON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.
SRM vs VSTO Comparison
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 158.5M. In comparison, VSTO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $9.19, while VSTO trades at $44.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -38.29, whereas VSTO's P/E ratio is -234.89. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to VSTO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to VSTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.
SRM vs YETI Comparison
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 158.5M. In comparison, YETI has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $9.19, while YETI trades at $30.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -38.29, whereas YETI's P/E ratio is 14.74. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to YETI's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to YETI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.
SRM vs PRKS Comparison
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 158.5M. In comparison, PRKS has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $9.19, while PRKS trades at $41.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -38.29, whereas PRKS's P/E ratio is 11.36. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to PRKS's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to PRKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.
SRM vs OSW Comparison
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 158.5M. In comparison, OSW has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $9.19, while OSW trades at $19.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -38.29, whereas OSW's P/E ratio is 30.57. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to OSW's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to OSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.
SRM vs MODG Comparison
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 158.5M. In comparison, MODG has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $9.19, while MODG trades at $8.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -38.29, whereas MODG's P/E ratio is -1.06. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to MODG's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to MODG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.
SRM vs LUCK Comparison
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 158.5M. In comparison, LUCK has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $9.19, while LUCK trades at $9.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -38.29, whereas LUCK's P/E ratio is -133.29. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to LUCK's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to LUCK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.
SRM vs GEAR Comparison
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 158.5M. In comparison, GEAR has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $9.19, while GEAR trades at $20.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -38.29, whereas GEAR's P/E ratio is -5.11. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to GEAR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to GEAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.
SRM vs XPOF Comparison
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 158.5M. In comparison, XPOF has a market cap of 402.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $9.19, while XPOF trades at $8.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -38.29, whereas XPOF's P/E ratio is -3.99. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to XPOF's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to XPOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.
SRM vs DOGZ Comparison
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 158.5M. In comparison, DOGZ has a market cap of 377.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $9.19, while DOGZ trades at $29.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -38.29, whereas DOGZ's P/E ratio is -75.95. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to DOGZ's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to DOGZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.
SRM vs JOUT Comparison
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 158.5M. In comparison, JOUT has a market cap of 322.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $9.19, while JOUT trades at $31.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -38.29, whereas JOUT's P/E ratio is -7.08. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to JOUT's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to JOUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.
SRM vs CNXA Comparison
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 158.5M. In comparison, CNXA has a market cap of 277.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $9.19, while CNXA trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -38.29, whereas CNXA's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to CNXA's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to CNXA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.
SRM vs FNKO Comparison
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 158.5M. In comparison, FNKO has a market cap of 275.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $9.19, while FNKO trades at $5.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -38.29, whereas FNKO's P/E ratio is -14.49. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to FNKO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to FNKO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.
SRM vs JAKK Comparison
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 158.5M. In comparison, JAKK has a market cap of 242.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $9.19, while JAKK trades at $21.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -38.29, whereas JAKK's P/E ratio is 5.18. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to JAKK's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to JAKK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.
SRM vs ESCA Comparison
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 158.5M. In comparison, ESCA has a market cap of 190.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $9.19, while ESCA trades at $13.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -38.29, whereas ESCA's P/E ratio is 13.94. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to ESCA's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to ESCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.
SRM vs AOUT Comparison
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 158.5M. In comparison, AOUT has a market cap of 144.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $9.19, while AOUT trades at $11.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -38.29, whereas AOUT's P/E ratio is -33.41. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to AOUT's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to AOUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.
SRM vs PLBY Comparison
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 158.5M. In comparison, PLBY has a market cap of 138.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $9.19, while PLBY trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -38.29, whereas PLBY's P/E ratio is -1.62. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to PLBY's ROE of +286.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to PLBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.
SRM vs CLAR Comparison
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 158.5M. In comparison, CLAR has a market cap of 136.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $9.19, while CLAR trades at $3.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -38.29, whereas CLAR's P/E ratio is -1.56. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to CLAR's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to CLAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.
SRM vs BTN Comparison
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 158.5M. In comparison, BTN has a market cap of 50.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $9.19, while BTN trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -38.29, whereas BTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to BTN's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to BTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.
SRM vs ISPO Comparison
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 158.5M. In comparison, ISPO has a market cap of 49.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $9.19, while ISPO trades at $3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -38.29, whereas ISPO's P/E ratio is -3.54. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to ISPO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to ISPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.
SRM vs NLS Comparison
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 158.5M. In comparison, NLS has a market cap of 29.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $9.19, while NLS trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -38.29, whereas NLS's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to NLS's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to NLS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.
SRM vs FGH Comparison
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 158.5M. In comparison, FGH has a market cap of 24.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $9.19, while FGH trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -38.29, whereas FGH's P/E ratio is -2.21. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to FGH's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to FGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.
SRM vs YYAI Comparison
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 158.5M. In comparison, YYAI has a market cap of 12.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $9.19, while YYAI trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -38.29, whereas YYAI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to YYAI's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to YYAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.
SRM vs MMA Comparison
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 158.5M. In comparison, MMA has a market cap of 12.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $9.19, while MMA trades at $1.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -38.29, whereas MMA's P/E ratio is -1.12. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to MMA's ROE of +1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to MMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.
SRM vs FXLV Comparison
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 158.5M. In comparison, FXLV has a market cap of 8.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $9.19, while FXLV trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -38.29, whereas FXLV's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to FXLV's ROE of -4.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to FXLV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.
SRM vs AGH Comparison
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 158.5M. In comparison, AGH has a market cap of 8.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $9.19, while AGH trades at $0.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -38.29, whereas AGH's P/E ratio is -30.80. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to AGH's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to AGH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.
SRM vs HWH Comparison
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 158.5M. In comparison, HWH has a market cap of 8.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $9.19, while HWH trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -38.29, whereas HWH's P/E ratio is -3.38. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to HWH's ROE of -2.91%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to HWH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.
SRM vs NWTG Comparison
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 158.5M. In comparison, NWTG has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $9.19, while NWTG trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -38.29, whereas NWTG's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to NWTG's ROE of -8.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to NWTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.
SRM vs GDHG Comparison
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 158.5M. In comparison, GDHG has a market cap of 3.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $9.19, while GDHG trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -38.29, whereas GDHG's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to GDHG's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to GDHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.
SRM vs SPGC Comparison
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 158.5M. In comparison, SPGC has a market cap of 891.6K. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $9.19, while SPGC trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -38.29, whereas SPGC's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to SPGC's ROE of -6.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is less volatile compared to SPGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.
SRM vs ISPOW Comparison
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 158.5M. In comparison, ISPOW has a market cap of 129.4K. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $9.19, while ISPOW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -38.29, whereas ISPOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to ISPOW's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to ISPOW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.
SRM vs BBIG Comparison
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 158.5M. In comparison, BBIG has a market cap of 2.5K. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $9.19, while BBIG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -38.29, whereas BBIG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to BBIG's ROE of -11.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is less volatile compared to BBIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.
SRM vs DVD Comparison
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 158.5M. In comparison, DVD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $9.19, while DVD trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -38.29, whereas DVD's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to DVD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to DVD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.
SRM vs DS-PD Comparison
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 158.5M. In comparison, DS-PD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $9.19, while DS-PD trades at $5.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -38.29, whereas DS-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to DS-PD's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to DS-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.
SRM vs BWL-A Comparison
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 158.5M. In comparison, BWL-A has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $9.19, while BWL-A trades at $8.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -38.29, whereas BWL-A's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to BWL-A's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to BWL-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.
SRM vs DS-PC Comparison
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 158.5M. In comparison, DS-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $9.19, while DS-PC trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -38.29, whereas DS-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to DS-PC's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to DS-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.
SRM vs DS-PB Comparison
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 158.5M. In comparison, DS-PB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $9.19, while DS-PB trades at $8.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -38.29, whereas DS-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to DS-PB's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to DS-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.
SRM vs DS Comparison
SRM plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRM stands at 158.5M. In comparison, DS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SRM is priced at $9.19, while DS trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRM currently has a P/E ratio of -38.29, whereas DS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SRM's ROE is -0.79%, compared to DS's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SRM is more volatile compared to DS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRM.