FG Group Holdings Inc.
FG Group Holdings Inc. (FGH) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FGH) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Leisure Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FGH | $1.24 | -5.70% | 24.4M | -2.21 | -$0.56 | N/A |
| CUK | $27.47 | +0.00% | 36.5B | 12.54 | $2.19 | +0.55% |
| CCL | $24.64 | -2.22% | 34.1B | 10.85 | $2.27 | +0.60% |
| AS | $32.84 | -1.47% | 19B | 43.18 | $0.76 | N/A |
| HAS | $95.25 | -0.42% | 13.5B | -59.16 | -$1.61 | +2.94% |
| LTH | $33.74 | -0.06% | 7.5B | 19.72 | $1.71 | N/A |
| GOLF | $85.40 | -0.74% | 5B | 29.96 | $2.85 | +1.12% |
| MAT | $15.15 | +0.26% | 4.4B | 9.71 | $1.56 | N/A |
| PLNT | $52.64 | +2.21% | 4.2B | 19.00 | $2.77 | N/A |
| ELY | $21.33 | -2.82% | 4B | 41.82 | $0.51 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FGH vs CUK Comparison May 2026
FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, CUK has a market cap of 36.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while CUK trades at $27.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas CUK's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CUK's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is more volatile compared to CUK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check CUK's competition here
FGH vs CCL Comparison May 2026
FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, CCL has a market cap of 34.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while CCL trades at $24.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas CCL's P/E ratio is 10.85. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CCL's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is more volatile compared to CCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check CCL's competition here
FGH vs AS Comparison May 2026
FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, AS has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while AS trades at $32.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas AS's P/E ratio is 43.18. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is more volatile compared to AS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check AS's competition here
FGH vs HAS Comparison May 2026
FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, HAS has a market cap of 13.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while HAS trades at $95.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas HAS's P/E ratio is -59.16. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to HAS's ROE of -0.48%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is more volatile compared to HAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check HAS's competition here
FGH vs LTH Comparison May 2026
FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, LTH has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while LTH trades at $33.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas LTH's P/E ratio is 19.72. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to LTH's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is more volatile compared to LTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check LTH's competition here
FGH vs GOLF Comparison May 2026
FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, GOLF has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while GOLF trades at $85.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas GOLF's P/E ratio is 29.96. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to GOLF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is more volatile compared to GOLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check GOLF's competition here
FGH vs MAT Comparison May 2026
FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, MAT has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while MAT trades at $15.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas MAT's P/E ratio is 9.71. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to MAT's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is more volatile compared to MAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check MAT's competition here
FGH vs PLNT Comparison May 2026
FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, PLNT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while PLNT trades at $52.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas PLNT's P/E ratio is 19.00. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to PLNT's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is more volatile compared to PLNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check PLNT's competition here
FGH vs ELY Comparison May 2026
FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, ELY has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while ELY trades at $21.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas ELY's P/E ratio is 41.82. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ELY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is more volatile compared to ELY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check ELY's competition here
FGH vs YETI Comparison May 2026
FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, YETI has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while YETI trades at $42.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas YETI's P/E ratio is 21.78. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to YETI's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is less volatile compared to YETI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check YETI's competition here
FGH vs SEAS Comparison May 2026
FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, SEAS has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while SEAS trades at $50.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas SEAS's P/E ratio is 13.27. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SEAS's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is more volatile compared to SEAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check SEAS's competition here
FGH vs CALY Comparison May 2026
FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, CALY has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while CALY trades at $15.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas CALY's P/E ratio is 58.54. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CALY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is more volatile compared to CALY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check CALY's competition here
FGH vs MODG Comparison May 2026
FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, MODG has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while MODG trades at $14.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas MODG's P/E ratio is -1.79. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to MODG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is more volatile compared to MODG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check MODG's competition here
FGH vs SIX Comparison May 2026
FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, SIX has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while SIX trades at $32.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas SIX's P/E ratio is 100.00. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SIX's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is more volatile compared to SIX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check SIX's competition here
FGH vs VSTO Comparison May 2026
FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, VSTO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while VSTO trades at $44.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas VSTO's P/E ratio is -234.89. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to VSTO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is more volatile compared to VSTO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check VSTO's competition here
FGH vs OSW Comparison May 2026
FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, OSW has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while OSW trades at $23.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas OSW's P/E ratio is 31.37. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to OSW's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is more volatile compared to OSW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check OSW's competition here
FGH vs FUN Comparison May 2026
FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, FUN has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while FUN trades at $21.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas FUN's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to FUN's ROE of -2.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is less volatile compared to FUN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check FUN's competition here
FGH vs PTON Comparison May 2026
FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, PTON has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while PTON trades at $5.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas PTON's P/E ratio is 88.17. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to PTON's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is more volatile compared to PTON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check PTON's competition here
FGH vs PRKS Comparison May 2026
FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, PRKS has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while PRKS trades at $36.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas PRKS's P/E ratio is 13.59. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to PRKS's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is more volatile compared to PRKS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check PRKS's competition here
FGH vs GEAR Comparison May 2026
FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, GEAR has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while GEAR trades at $20.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas GEAR's P/E ratio is -5.11. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to GEAR's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is more volatile compared to GEAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check GEAR's competition here
FGH vs LUCK Comparison May 2026
FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, LUCK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while LUCK trades at $8.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas LUCK's P/E ratio is -13.08. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to LUCK's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is more volatile compared to LUCK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check LUCK's competition here
FGH vs JOUT Comparison May 2026
FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, JOUT has a market cap of 428.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while JOUT trades at $40.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas JOUT's P/E ratio is -27.07. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to JOUT's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is less volatile compared to JOUT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check JOUT's competition here
FGH vs HERE Comparison May 2026
FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, HERE has a market cap of 321M. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while HERE trades at $2.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas HERE's P/E ratio is 4.42. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to HERE's ROE of +0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is more volatile compared to HERE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check HERE's competition here
FGH vs FNKO Comparison May 2026
FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, FNKO has a market cap of 282.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while FNKO trades at $5.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas FNKO's P/E ratio is -4.82. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to FNKO's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is more volatile compared to FNKO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check FNKO's competition here
FGH vs CNXA Comparison May 2026
FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, CNXA has a market cap of 277.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while CNXA trades at $1.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas CNXA's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CNXA's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is less volatile compared to CNXA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check CNXA's competition here
FGH vs ESCA Comparison May 2026
FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, ESCA has a market cap of 253.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while ESCA trades at $18.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas ESCA's P/E ratio is 16.38. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ESCA's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is more volatile compared to ESCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check ESCA's competition here
FGH vs JAKK Comparison May 2026
FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, JAKK has a market cap of 244M. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while JAKK trades at $21.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas JAKK's P/E ratio is 30.46. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to JAKK's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is more volatile compared to JAKK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check JAKK's competition here
FGH vs SRM Comparison May 2026
FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, SRM has a market cap of 183.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while SRM trades at $10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas SRM's P/E ratio is -42.92. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SRM's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is less volatile compared to SRM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check SRM's competition here
FGH vs XPOF Comparison May 2026
FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, XPOF has a market cap of 178.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while XPOF trades at $4.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas XPOF's P/E ratio is -3.45. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to XPOF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is less volatile compared to XPOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check XPOF's competition here
FGH vs PLBY Comparison May 2026
FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, PLBY has a market cap of 124.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while PLBY trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas PLBY's P/E ratio is -22.17. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to PLBY's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is more volatile compared to PLBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check PLBY's competition here
FGH vs AOUT Comparison May 2026
FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, AOUT has a market cap of 109.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while AOUT trades at $8.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas AOUT's P/E ratio is -11.17. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AOUT's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is more volatile compared to AOUT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check AOUT's competition here
FGH vs CLAR Comparison May 2026
FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, CLAR has a market cap of 104.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while CLAR trades at $2.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas CLAR's P/E ratio is -2.35. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to CLAR's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is more volatile compared to CLAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check CLAR's competition here
FGH vs TRON Comparison May 2026
FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, TRON has a market cap of 70.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while TRON trades at $2.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas TRON's P/E ratio is -30.14. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to TRON's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is more volatile compared to TRON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check TRON's competition here
FGH vs AGH Comparison May 2026
FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, AGH has a market cap of 60M. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while AGH trades at $4.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas AGH's P/E ratio is -13.53. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to AGH's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is less volatile compared to AGH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check AGH's competition here
FGH vs ISPO Comparison May 2026
FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, ISPO has a market cap of 53.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while ISPO trades at $4.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas ISPO's P/E ratio is -4.95. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ISPO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is more volatile compared to ISPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check ISPO's competition here
FGH vs BTN Comparison May 2026
FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, BTN has a market cap of 50.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while BTN trades at $2.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas BTN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BTN's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is more volatile compared to BTN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check BTN's competition here
FGH vs NOMA Comparison May 2026
FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, NOMA has a market cap of 48.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while NOMA trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas NOMA's P/E ratio is -17.89. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to NOMA's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is less volatile compared to NOMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check NOMA's competition here
FGH vs KMRK Comparison May 2026
FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, KMRK has a market cap of 48.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while KMRK trades at $2.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas KMRK's P/E ratio is -125.00. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to KMRK's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is less volatile compared to KMRK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check KMRK's competition here
FGH vs NLS Comparison May 2026
FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, NLS has a market cap of 29.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while NLS trades at $0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas NLS's P/E ratio is -0.50. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to NLS's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is less volatile compared to NLS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check NLS's competition here
FGH vs DOGZ Comparison May 2026
FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, DOGZ has a market cap of 17.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while DOGZ trades at $1.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas DOGZ's P/E ratio is -2.23. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to DOGZ's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is less volatile compared to DOGZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check DOGZ's competition here
FGH vs MMA Comparison May 2026
FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, MMA has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while MMA trades at $0.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas MMA's P/E ratio is -0.39. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to MMA's ROE of -20.39%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is less volatile compared to MMA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check MMA's competition here
FGH vs YYAI Comparison May 2026
FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, YYAI has a market cap of 7.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while YYAI trades at $0.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas YYAI's P/E ratio is 0.06. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to YYAI's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is less volatile compared to YYAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check YYAI's competition here
FGH vs HWH Comparison May 2026
FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, HWH has a market cap of 6.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while HWH trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas HWH's P/E ratio is -2.57. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to HWH's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is more volatile compared to HWH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check HWH's competition here
FGH vs NWTG Comparison May 2026
FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, NWTG has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while NWTG trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas NWTG's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to NWTG's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is less volatile compared to NWTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check NWTG's competition here
FGH vs GDHG Comparison May 2026
FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, GDHG has a market cap of 4.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while GDHG trades at $1.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas GDHG's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to GDHG's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is more volatile compared to GDHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check GDHG's competition here
FGH vs SPGC Comparison May 2026
FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, SPGC has a market cap of 891.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while SPGC trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas SPGC's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to SPGC's ROE of -4.77%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is less volatile compared to SPGC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check SPGC's competition here
FGH vs FXLV Comparison May 2026
FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, FXLV has a market cap of 97.5K. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while FXLV trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas FXLV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to FXLV's ROE of -4.63%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is less volatile compared to FXLV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check FXLV's competition here
FGH vs ISPOW Comparison May 2026
FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, ISPOW has a market cap of 90.9K. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while ISPOW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas ISPOW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ISPOW's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is less volatile compared to ISPOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check ISPOW's competition here
FGH vs BBIG Comparison May 2026
FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, BBIG has a market cap of 46.1K. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while BBIG trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas BBIG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BBIG's ROE of -11.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is less volatile compared to BBIG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check BBIG's competition here
FGH vs ILG Comparison May 2026
FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, ILG has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while ILG trades at $34.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas ILG's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to ILG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is more volatile compared to ILG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check ILG's competition here
FGH vs DVD Comparison May 2026
FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, DVD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while DVD trades at $3.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas DVD's P/E ratio is 10.31. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to DVD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is more volatile compared to DVD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check DVD's competition here
FGH vs DS-PC Comparison May 2026
FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, DS-PC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while DS-PC trades at $5.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas DS-PC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to DS-PC's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is less volatile compared to DS-PC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check DS-PC's competition here
FGH vs DS-PB Comparison May 2026
FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, DS-PB has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while DS-PB trades at $8.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas DS-PB's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to DS-PB's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is less volatile compared to DS-PB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check DS-PB's competition here
FGH vs MYCC Comparison May 2026
FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, MYCC has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while MYCC trades at $17.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas MYCC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to MYCC's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is more volatile compared to MYCC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check MYCC's competition here
FGH vs DS-PD Comparison May 2026
FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, DS-PD has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while DS-PD trades at $5.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas DS-PD's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to DS-PD's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is less volatile compared to DS-PD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check DS-PD's competition here
FGH vs DS Comparison May 2026
FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, DS has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while DS trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas DS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to DS's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is less volatile compared to DS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check DS's competition here
FGH vs BWL-A Comparison May 2026
FGH plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FGH stands at 24.4M. In comparison, BWL-A has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FGH is priced at $1.24, while BWL-A trades at $8.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FGH currently has a P/E ratio of -2.21, whereas BWL-A's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, FGH's ROE is -0.15%, compared to BWL-A's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FGH is more volatile compared to BWL-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FGH.Check BWL-A's competition here