SRF Limited
SRF Limited (SRF.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SRF.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Chemicals - Specialty Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRF.NS | ₹2,583.60 | -2.36% | 765.8B | 43.08 | ₹59.97 | +0.35% |
| ASIANPAINT.BO | ₹2,413.25 | -0.64% | 2.3T | 60.00 | ₹40.22 | +1.04% |
| ASIANPAINT.NS | ₹2,413.10 | -0.68% | 2.3T | 60.24 | ₹40.06 | +1.04% |
| PIDILITIND.BO | ₹1,480.95 | -0.02% | 1.5T | 65.88 | ₹22.48 | +1.01% |
| PIDILITIND.NS | ₹1,480.50 | -0.03% | 1.5T | 66.06 | ₹22.41 | +1.01% |
| SOLARINDS.BO | ₹13,287.40 | -0.60% | 1.2T | 82.83 | ₹160.41 | +0.08% |
| SOLARINDS.NS | ₹13,279.00 | -0.68% | 1.2T | 82.77 | ₹160.44 | +0.08% |
| SRF.BO | ₹2,582.40 | -2.54% | 765.5B | 43.08 | ₹59.94 | +0.35% |
| LINDEINDIA.BO | ₹6,640.60 | -1.40% | 566.3B | 95.62 | ₹69.45 | +0.18% |
| LINDEINDIA.NS | ₹6,636.50 | -1.53% | 566B | 95.76 | ₹69.30 | +0.18% |
Stock Comparison
SRF.NS vs ASIANPAINT.BO Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, ASIANPAINT.BO has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while ASIANPAINT.BO trades at ₹2,413.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas ASIANPAINT.BO's P/E ratio is 60.00. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ASIANPAINT.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is more volatile compared to ASIANPAINT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check ASIANPAINT.BO's competition here
SRF.NS vs ASIANPAINT.NS Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, ASIANPAINT.NS has a market cap of 2.3T. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while ASIANPAINT.NS trades at ₹2,413.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas ASIANPAINT.NS's P/E ratio is 60.24. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ASIANPAINT.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is more volatile compared to ASIANPAINT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check ASIANPAINT.NS's competition here
SRF.NS vs PIDILITIND.BO Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, PIDILITIND.BO has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while PIDILITIND.BO trades at ₹1,480.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas PIDILITIND.BO's P/E ratio is 65.88. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PIDILITIND.BO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is more volatile compared to PIDILITIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check PIDILITIND.BO's competition here
SRF.NS vs PIDILITIND.NS Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, PIDILITIND.NS has a market cap of 1.5T. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while PIDILITIND.NS trades at ₹1,480.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas PIDILITIND.NS's P/E ratio is 66.06. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PIDILITIND.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is more volatile compared to PIDILITIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check PIDILITIND.NS's competition here
SRF.NS vs SOLARINDS.BO Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, SOLARINDS.BO has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while SOLARINDS.BO trades at ₹13,287.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas SOLARINDS.BO's P/E ratio is 82.83. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SOLARINDS.BO's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is more volatile compared to SOLARINDS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check SOLARINDS.BO's competition here
SRF.NS vs SOLARINDS.NS Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, SOLARINDS.NS has a market cap of 1.2T. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while SOLARINDS.NS trades at ₹13,279.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas SOLARINDS.NS's P/E ratio is 82.77. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SOLARINDS.NS's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is more volatile compared to SOLARINDS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check SOLARINDS.NS's competition here
SRF.NS vs SRF.BO Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, SRF.BO has a market cap of 765.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while SRF.BO trades at ₹2,582.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas SRF.BO's P/E ratio is 43.08. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SRF.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is more volatile compared to SRF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check SRF.BO's competition here
SRF.NS vs LINDEINDIA.BO Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, LINDEINDIA.BO has a market cap of 566.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while LINDEINDIA.BO trades at ₹6,640.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas LINDEINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 95.62. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LINDEINDIA.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is more volatile compared to LINDEINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check LINDEINDIA.BO's competition here
SRF.NS vs LINDEINDIA.NS Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, LINDEINDIA.NS has a market cap of 566B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while LINDEINDIA.NS trades at ₹6,636.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas LINDEINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 95.76. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LINDEINDIA.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is more volatile compared to LINDEINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check LINDEINDIA.NS's competition here
SRF.NS vs BERGEPAINT.NS Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, BERGEPAINT.NS has a market cap of 539.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while BERGEPAINT.NS trades at ₹462.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas BERGEPAINT.NS's P/E ratio is 51.30. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BERGEPAINT.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is more volatile compared to BERGEPAINT.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check BERGEPAINT.NS's competition here
SRF.NS vs BERGEPAINT.BO Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, BERGEPAINT.BO has a market cap of 539.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while BERGEPAINT.BO trades at ₹462.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas BERGEPAINT.BO's P/E ratio is 49.91. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BERGEPAINT.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is more volatile compared to BERGEPAINT.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check BERGEPAINT.BO's competition here
SRF.NS vs FLUOROCHEM.BO Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, FLUOROCHEM.BO has a market cap of 388.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while FLUOROCHEM.BO trades at ₹3,535.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas FLUOROCHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 59.03. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FLUOROCHEM.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is less volatile compared to FLUOROCHEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check FLUOROCHEM.BO's competition here
SRF.NS vs HSCL.BO Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, HSCL.BO has a market cap of 246.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while HSCL.BO trades at ₹488.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas HSCL.BO's P/E ratio is 34.52. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HSCL.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is more volatile compared to HSCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check HSCL.BO's competition here
SRF.NS vs HSCL.NS Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, HSCL.NS has a market cap of 246.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while HSCL.NS trades at ₹488.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas HSCL.NS's P/E ratio is 34.50. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to HSCL.NS's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is more volatile compared to HSCL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check HSCL.NS's competition here
SRF.NS vs ATUL.NS Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, ATUL.NS has a market cap of 190.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while ATUL.NS trades at ₹6,468.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas ATUL.NS's P/E ratio is 32.01. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ATUL.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is more volatile compared to ATUL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check ATUL.NS's competition here
SRF.NS vs ATUL.BO Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, ATUL.BO has a market cap of 190.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while ATUL.BO trades at ₹6,461.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas ATUL.BO's P/E ratio is 32.01. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ATUL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is more volatile compared to ATUL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check ATUL.BO's competition here
SRF.NS vs ACUTAAS.NS Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, ACUTAAS.NS has a market cap of 176.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while ACUTAAS.NS trades at ₹2,152.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas ACUTAAS.NS's P/E ratio is 61.55. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ACUTAAS.NS's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is less volatile compared to ACUTAAS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check ACUTAAS.NS's competition here
SRF.NS vs ACUTAAS.BO Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, ACUTAAS.BO has a market cap of 176B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while ACUTAAS.BO trades at ₹2,149.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas ACUTAAS.BO's P/E ratio is 61.45. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ACUTAAS.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is less volatile compared to ACUTAAS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check ACUTAAS.BO's competition here
SRF.NS vs DCMSHRIRAM.BO Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, DCMSHRIRAM.BO has a market cap of 169.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while DCMSHRIRAM.BO trades at ₹1,084.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas DCMSHRIRAM.BO's P/E ratio is 25.51. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DCMSHRIRAM.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is less volatile compared to DCMSHRIRAM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check DCMSHRIRAM.BO's competition here
SRF.NS vs DCMSHRIRAM.NS Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, DCMSHRIRAM.NS has a market cap of 168.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while DCMSHRIRAM.NS trades at ₹1,083.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas DCMSHRIRAM.NS's P/E ratio is 25.50. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DCMSHRIRAM.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is more volatile compared to DCMSHRIRAM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check DCMSHRIRAM.NS's competition here
SRF.NS vs AARTIIND.NS Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, AARTIIND.NS has a market cap of 163.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while AARTIIND.NS trades at ₹449.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas AARTIIND.NS's P/E ratio is 43.21. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AARTIIND.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is less volatile compared to AARTIIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check AARTIIND.NS's competition here
SRF.NS vs AARTIIND.BO Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, AARTIIND.BO has a market cap of 163B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while AARTIIND.BO trades at ₹449.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas AARTIIND.BO's P/E ratio is 43.17. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AARTIIND.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is less volatile compared to AARTIIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check AARTIIND.BO's competition here
SRF.NS vs KANSAINER.NS Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, KANSAINER.NS has a market cap of 159.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while KANSAINER.NS trades at ₹197.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas KANSAINER.NS's P/E ratio is 27.34. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KANSAINER.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is more volatile compared to KANSAINER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check KANSAINER.NS's competition here
SRF.NS vs KANSAINER.BO Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, KANSAINER.BO has a market cap of 159.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while KANSAINER.BO trades at ₹197.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas KANSAINER.BO's P/E ratio is 27.30. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KANSAINER.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is more volatile compared to KANSAINER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check KANSAINER.BO's competition here
SRF.NS vs VINATIORGA.NS Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, VINATIORGA.NS has a market cap of 156B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while VINATIORGA.NS trades at ₹1,504.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas VINATIORGA.NS's P/E ratio is 35.17. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VINATIORGA.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is more volatile compared to VINATIORGA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check VINATIORGA.NS's competition here
SRF.NS vs VINATIORGA.BO Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, VINATIORGA.BO has a market cap of 155.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while VINATIORGA.BO trades at ₹1,502.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas VINATIORGA.BO's P/E ratio is 35.14. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VINATIORGA.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is more volatile compared to VINATIORGA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check VINATIORGA.BO's competition here
SRF.NS vs BASF.BO Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, BASF.BO has a market cap of 152.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while BASF.BO trades at ₹3,532.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas BASF.BO's P/E ratio is 40.71. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BASF.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is more volatile compared to BASF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check BASF.BO's competition here
SRF.NS vs BASF.NS Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, BASF.NS has a market cap of 152.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while BASF.NS trades at ₹3,530.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas BASF.NS's P/E ratio is 40.35. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BASF.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is more volatile compared to BASF.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check BASF.NS's competition here
SRF.NS vs FINEORG.NS Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, FINEORG.NS has a market cap of 149.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while FINEORG.NS trades at ₹4,872.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas FINEORG.NS's P/E ratio is 37.71. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FINEORG.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is less volatile compared to FINEORG.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check FINEORG.NS's competition here
SRF.NS vs FINEORG.BO Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, FINEORG.BO has a market cap of 149.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while FINEORG.BO trades at ₹4,867.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas FINEORG.BO's P/E ratio is 37.57. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FINEORG.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is less volatile compared to FINEORG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check FINEORG.BO's competition here
SRF.NS vs ANURAS.NS Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, ANURAS.NS has a market cap of 144.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while ANURAS.NS trades at ₹1,268.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas ANURAS.NS's P/E ratio is 82.28. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ANURAS.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is more volatile compared to ANURAS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check ANURAS.NS's competition here
SRF.NS vs ANURAS.BO Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, ANURAS.BO has a market cap of 144.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while ANURAS.BO trades at ₹1,265.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas ANURAS.BO's P/E ratio is 82.03. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ANURAS.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is more volatile compared to ANURAS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check ANURAS.BO's competition here
SRF.NS vs AKZOINDIA.NS Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, AKZOINDIA.NS has a market cap of 142B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while AKZOINDIA.NS trades at ₹3,117.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas AKZOINDIA.NS's P/E ratio is 7.25. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AKZOINDIA.NS's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is more volatile compared to AKZOINDIA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check AKZOINDIA.NS's competition here
SRF.NS vs AKZOINDIA.BO Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, AKZOINDIA.BO has a market cap of 141.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while AKZOINDIA.BO trades at ₹3,115.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas AKZOINDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 7.25. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AKZOINDIA.BO's ROE of +1.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is more volatile compared to AKZOINDIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check AKZOINDIA.BO's competition here
SRF.NS vs AETHER.BO Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, AETHER.BO has a market cap of 128B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while AETHER.BO trades at ₹965.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas AETHER.BO's P/E ratio is 59.43. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AETHER.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is more volatile compared to AETHER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check AETHER.BO's competition here
SRF.NS vs AETHER.NS Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, AETHER.NS has a market cap of 128B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while AETHER.NS trades at ₹965.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas AETHER.NS's P/E ratio is 59.31. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AETHER.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is more volatile compared to AETHER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check AETHER.NS's competition here
SRF.NS vs SPLPETRO.BO Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, SPLPETRO.BO has a market cap of 122.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while SPLPETRO.BO trades at ₹651.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas SPLPETRO.BO's P/E ratio is 45.80. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SPLPETRO.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is more volatile compared to SPLPETRO.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check SPLPETRO.BO's competition here
SRF.NS vs PCBL.BO Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, PCBL.BO has a market cap of 122.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while PCBL.BO trades at ₹310.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas PCBL.BO's P/E ratio is 45.95. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PCBL.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is less volatile compared to PCBL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check PCBL.BO's competition here
SRF.NS vs PCBL.NS Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, PCBL.NS has a market cap of 122.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while PCBL.NS trades at ₹310.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas PCBL.NS's P/E ratio is 46.00. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PCBL.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is less volatile compared to PCBL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check PCBL.NS's competition here
SRF.NS vs PRIVISCL.NS Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, PRIVISCL.NS has a market cap of 116.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while PRIVISCL.NS trades at ₹2,989.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas PRIVISCL.NS's P/E ratio is 38.93. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PRIVISCL.NS's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is more volatile compared to PRIVISCL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check PRIVISCL.NS's competition here
SRF.NS vs PRIVISCL.BO Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, PRIVISCL.BO has a market cap of 116.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while PRIVISCL.BO trades at ₹2,987.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas PRIVISCL.BO's P/E ratio is 38.85. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PRIVISCL.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is more volatile compared to PRIVISCL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check PRIVISCL.BO's competition here
SRF.NS vs AMIORG.NS Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, AMIORG.NS has a market cap of 96.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while AMIORG.NS trades at ₹1,176.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas AMIORG.NS's P/E ratio is 119.06. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AMIORG.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is more volatile compared to AMIORG.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check AMIORG.NS's competition here
SRF.NS vs AMIORG.BO Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, AMIORG.BO has a market cap of 96.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while AMIORG.BO trades at ₹1,176.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas AMIORG.BO's P/E ratio is 118.95. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to AMIORG.BO's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is more volatile compared to AMIORG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check AMIORG.BO's competition here
SRF.NS vs JUBLINGREA.BO Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, JUBLINGREA.BO has a market cap of 95.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while JUBLINGREA.BO trades at ₹602.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas JUBLINGREA.BO's P/E ratio is 35.98. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JUBLINGREA.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is more volatile compared to JUBLINGREA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check JUBLINGREA.BO's competition here
SRF.NS vs GRWRHITECH.NS Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, GRWRHITECH.NS has a market cap of 92.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while GRWRHITECH.NS trades at ₹3,962.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas GRWRHITECH.NS's P/E ratio is 29.92. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GRWRHITECH.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is less volatile compared to GRWRHITECH.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check GRWRHITECH.NS's competition here
SRF.NS vs GRWRHITECH.BO Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, GRWRHITECH.BO has a market cap of 92B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while GRWRHITECH.BO trades at ₹3,961.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas GRWRHITECH.BO's P/E ratio is 29.91. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GRWRHITECH.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is less volatile compared to GRWRHITECH.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check GRWRHITECH.BO's competition here
SRF.NS vs SHAILY.BO Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, SHAILY.BO has a market cap of 89.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while SHAILY.BO trades at ₹1,946.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas SHAILY.BO's P/E ratio is 56.53. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SHAILY.BO's ROE of +0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is less volatile compared to SHAILY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check SHAILY.BO's competition here
SRF.NS vs CLEAN.NS Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, CLEAN.NS has a market cap of 77.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while CLEAN.NS trades at ₹725.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas CLEAN.NS's P/E ratio is 31.40. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CLEAN.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is more volatile compared to CLEAN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check CLEAN.NS's competition here
SRF.NS vs CLEAN.BO Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, CLEAN.BO has a market cap of 77B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while CLEAN.BO trades at ₹724.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas CLEAN.BO's P/E ratio is 31.43. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CLEAN.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is more volatile compared to CLEAN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check CLEAN.BO's competition here
SRF.NS vs ALKYLAMINE.NS Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, ALKYLAMINE.NS has a market cap of 76.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while ALKYLAMINE.NS trades at ₹1,496.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas ALKYLAMINE.NS's P/E ratio is 42.47. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ALKYLAMINE.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is more volatile compared to ALKYLAMINE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check ALKYLAMINE.NS's competition here
SRF.NS vs ALKYLAMINE.BO Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, ALKYLAMINE.BO has a market cap of 76.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while ALKYLAMINE.BO trades at ₹1,495.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas ALKYLAMINE.BO's P/E ratio is 42.47. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ALKYLAMINE.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is more volatile compared to ALKYLAMINE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check ALKYLAMINE.BO's competition here
SRF.NS vs SUDARSCHEM.BO Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, SUDARSCHEM.BO has a market cap of 69.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while SUDARSCHEM.BO trades at ₹888.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas SUDARSCHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 131.38. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SUDARSCHEM.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is more volatile compared to SUDARSCHEM.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check SUDARSCHEM.BO's competition here
SRF.NS vs SUDARSCHEM.NS Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, SUDARSCHEM.NS has a market cap of 69.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while SUDARSCHEM.NS trades at ₹887.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas SUDARSCHEM.NS's P/E ratio is -111.93. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SUDARSCHEM.NS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is less volatile compared to SUDARSCHEM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check SUDARSCHEM.NS's competition here
SRF.NS vs GALAXYSURF.BO Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, GALAXYSURF.BO has a market cap of 69.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while GALAXYSURF.BO trades at ₹1,949.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas GALAXYSURF.BO's P/E ratio is 24.63. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GALAXYSURF.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is more volatile compared to GALAXYSURF.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check GALAXYSURF.BO's competition here
SRF.NS vs GALAXYSURF.NS Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, GALAXYSURF.NS has a market cap of 68.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while GALAXYSURF.NS trades at ₹1,942.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas GALAXYSURF.NS's P/E ratio is 24.50. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GALAXYSURF.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is more volatile compared to GALAXYSURF.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check GALAXYSURF.NS's competition here
SRF.NS vs KINGFA.BO Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, KINGFA.BO has a market cap of 56.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while KINGFA.BO trades at ₹4,188.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas KINGFA.BO's P/E ratio is 32.85. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KINGFA.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is less volatile compared to KINGFA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check KINGFA.BO's competition here
SRF.NS vs KINGFA.NS Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, KINGFA.NS has a market cap of 56.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while KINGFA.NS trades at ₹4,172.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas KINGFA.NS's P/E ratio is 32.68. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KINGFA.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is less volatile compared to KINGFA.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check KINGFA.NS's competition here
SRF.NS vs GULFOILLUB.NS Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, GULFOILLUB.NS has a market cap of 53B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while GULFOILLUB.NS trades at ₹1,072.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas GULFOILLUB.NS's P/E ratio is 15.27. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GULFOILLUB.NS's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is more volatile compared to GULFOILLUB.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check GULFOILLUB.NS's competition here
SRF.NS vs GULFOILLUB.BO Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, GULFOILLUB.BO has a market cap of 52.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while GULFOILLUB.BO trades at ₹1,071.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas GULFOILLUB.BO's P/E ratio is 15.26. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GULFOILLUB.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is more volatile compared to GULFOILLUB.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check GULFOILLUB.BO's competition here
SRF.NS vs RESPONIND.NS Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, RESPONIND.NS has a market cap of 47.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while RESPONIND.NS trades at ₹177.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas RESPONIND.NS's P/E ratio is 26.35. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RESPONIND.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is more volatile compared to RESPONIND.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check RESPONIND.NS's competition here
SRF.NS vs RESPONIND.BO Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, RESPONIND.BO has a market cap of 47.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while RESPONIND.BO trades at ₹177.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas RESPONIND.BO's P/E ratio is 26.31. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to RESPONIND.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is more volatile compared to RESPONIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check RESPONIND.BO's competition here
SRF.NS vs INDIGOPNTS.NS Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, INDIGOPNTS.NS has a market cap of 45.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while INDIGOPNTS.NS trades at ₹948.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas INDIGOPNTS.NS's P/E ratio is 31.46. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to INDIGOPNTS.NS's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is more volatile compared to INDIGOPNTS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check INDIGOPNTS.NS's competition here
SRF.NS vs INDIGOPNTS.BO Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, INDIGOPNTS.BO has a market cap of 45.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while INDIGOPNTS.BO trades at ₹948.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas INDIGOPNTS.BO's P/E ratio is 31.42. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to INDIGOPNTS.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is more volatile compared to INDIGOPNTS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check INDIGOPNTS.BO's competition here
SRF.NS vs TANFACIND.BO Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, TANFACIND.BO has a market cap of 40.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while TANFACIND.BO trades at ₹4,016.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas TANFACIND.BO's P/E ratio is 53.68. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TANFACIND.BO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is less volatile compared to TANFACIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check TANFACIND.BO's competition here
SRF.NS vs LXCHEM.NS Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, LXCHEM.NS has a market cap of 36.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while LXCHEM.NS trades at ₹132.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas LXCHEM.NS's P/E ratio is 46.27. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LXCHEM.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is less volatile compared to LXCHEM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check LXCHEM.NS's competition here
SRF.NS vs LXCHEM.BO Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, LXCHEM.BO has a market cap of 36.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while LXCHEM.BO trades at ₹132.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas LXCHEM.BO's P/E ratio is 46.10. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to LXCHEM.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is less volatile compared to LXCHEM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check LXCHEM.BO's competition here
SRF.NS vs NEOGEN.NS Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, NEOGEN.NS has a market cap of 35.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while NEOGEN.NS trades at ₹1,346.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas NEOGEN.NS's P/E ratio is 181.17. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NEOGEN.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is more volatile compared to NEOGEN.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check NEOGEN.NS's competition here
SRF.NS vs NEOGEN.BO Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, NEOGEN.BO has a market cap of 35.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while NEOGEN.BO trades at ₹1,342.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas NEOGEN.BO's P/E ratio is 180.74. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to NEOGEN.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is less volatile compared to NEOGEN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check NEOGEN.BO's competition here
SRF.NS vs BALAMINES.NS Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, BALAMINES.NS has a market cap of 35.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while BALAMINES.NS trades at ₹1,082.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas BALAMINES.NS's P/E ratio is 24.32. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BALAMINES.NS's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is more volatile compared to BALAMINES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check BALAMINES.NS's competition here
SRF.NS vs BALAMINES.BO Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, BALAMINES.BO has a market cap of 34.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while BALAMINES.BO trades at ₹1,076.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas BALAMINES.BO's P/E ratio is 24.21. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to BALAMINES.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is more volatile compared to BALAMINES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check BALAMINES.BO's competition here
SRF.NS vs VISHNU.BO Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, VISHNU.BO has a market cap of 34.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while VISHNU.BO trades at ₹514.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas VISHNU.BO's P/E ratio is 25.07. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VISHNU.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is more volatile compared to VISHNU.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check VISHNU.BO's competition here
SRF.NS vs ADVENZYMES.BO Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, ADVENZYMES.BO has a market cap of 34.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while ADVENZYMES.BO trades at ₹309.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas ADVENZYMES.BO's P/E ratio is 22.76. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ADVENZYMES.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is more volatile compared to ADVENZYMES.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check ADVENZYMES.BO's competition here
SRF.NS vs VISHNU.NS Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, VISHNU.NS has a market cap of 34.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while VISHNU.NS trades at ₹513.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas VISHNU.NS's P/E ratio is 25.00. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to VISHNU.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is more volatile compared to VISHNU.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check VISHNU.NS's competition here
SRF.NS vs ADVENZYMES.NS Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, ADVENZYMES.NS has a market cap of 34.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while ADVENZYMES.NS trades at ₹308.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas ADVENZYMES.NS's P/E ratio is 22.72. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ADVENZYMES.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is more volatile compared to ADVENZYMES.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check ADVENZYMES.NS's competition here
SRF.NS vs POCL.NS Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, POCL.NS has a market cap of 34B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while POCL.NS trades at ₹1,115.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas POCL.NS's P/E ratio is 29.84. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to POCL.NS's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is less volatile compared to POCL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check POCL.NS's competition here
SRF.NS vs POCL.BO Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, POCL.BO has a market cap of 33.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while POCL.BO trades at ₹1,112.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas POCL.BO's P/E ratio is 29.78. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to POCL.BO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is less volatile compared to POCL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check POCL.BO's competition here
SRF.NS vs GRAUWEIL.BO Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, GRAUWEIL.BO has a market cap of 30.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while GRAUWEIL.BO trades at ₹66.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas GRAUWEIL.BO's P/E ratio is 21.61. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GRAUWEIL.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is less volatile compared to GRAUWEIL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check GRAUWEIL.BO's competition here
SRF.NS vs GRAUWEIL.NS Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, GRAUWEIL.NS has a market cap of 29.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while GRAUWEIL.NS trades at ₹117.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas GRAUWEIL.NS's P/E ratio is 20.50. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to GRAUWEIL.NS's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is less volatile compared to GRAUWEIL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check GRAUWEIL.NS's competition here
SRF.NS vs TATVA.NS Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, TATVA.NS has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while TATVA.NS trades at ₹1,228.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas TATVA.NS's P/E ratio is 87.95. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TATVA.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is more volatile compared to TATVA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check TATVA.NS's competition here
SRF.NS vs TATVA.BO Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, TATVA.BO has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while TATVA.BO trades at ₹1,228.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas TATVA.BO's P/E ratio is 87.79. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to TATVA.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is more volatile compared to TATVA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check TATVA.BO's competition here
SRF.NS vs DDEVPLSTIK.BO Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, DDEVPLSTIK.BO has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while DDEVPLSTIK.BO trades at ₹276.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas DDEVPLSTIK.BO's P/E ratio is 14.40. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DDEVPLSTIK.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is more volatile compared to DDEVPLSTIK.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check DDEVPLSTIK.BO's competition here
SRF.NS vs DDEVPLSTIK.NS Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, DDEVPLSTIK.NS has a market cap of 28.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while DDEVPLSTIK.NS trades at ₹276.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas DDEVPLSTIK.NS's P/E ratio is 14.38. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to DDEVPLSTIK.NS's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is more volatile compared to DDEVPLSTIK.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check DDEVPLSTIK.NS's competition here
SRF.NS vs JUBLCPL.NS Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, JUBLCPL.NS has a market cap of 28.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while JUBLCPL.NS trades at ₹1,857.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas JUBLCPL.NS's P/E ratio is 23.21. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JUBLCPL.NS's ROE of +0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is less volatile compared to JUBLCPL.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check JUBLCPL.NS's competition here
SRF.NS vs PRINCEPIPE.NS Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, PRINCEPIPE.NS has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while PRINCEPIPE.NS trades at ₹250.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas PRINCEPIPE.NS's P/E ratio is 63.88. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PRINCEPIPE.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is less volatile compared to PRINCEPIPE.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check PRINCEPIPE.NS's competition here
SRF.NS vs ROSSARI.NS Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, ROSSARI.NS has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while ROSSARI.NS trades at ₹499.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas ROSSARI.NS's P/E ratio is 20.10. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ROSSARI.NS's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is less volatile compared to ROSSARI.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check ROSSARI.NS's competition here
SRF.NS vs ROSSARI.BO Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, ROSSARI.BO has a market cap of 27.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while ROSSARI.BO trades at ₹498.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas ROSSARI.BO's P/E ratio is 20.05. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to ROSSARI.BO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is less volatile compared to ROSSARI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check ROSSARI.BO's competition here
SRF.NS vs KIRIINDUS.BO Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, KIRIINDUS.BO has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while KIRIINDUS.BO trades at ₹457.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas KIRIINDUS.BO's P/E ratio is 0.57. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KIRIINDUS.BO's ROE of +1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is more volatile compared to KIRIINDUS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check KIRIINDUS.BO's competition here
SRF.NS vs KIRIINDUS.NS Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, KIRIINDUS.NS has a market cap of 27.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while KIRIINDUS.NS trades at ₹456.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas KIRIINDUS.NS's P/E ratio is 0.57. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to KIRIINDUS.NS's ROE of +1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is more volatile compared to KIRIINDUS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check KIRIINDUS.NS's competition here
SRF.NS vs JUBLCPL.BO Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, JUBLCPL.BO has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while JUBLCPL.BO trades at ₹1,789.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas JUBLCPL.BO's P/E ratio is 22.36. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JUBLCPL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is more volatile compared to JUBLCPL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check JUBLCPL.BO's competition here
SRF.NS vs CAMLINFINE.BO Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, CAMLINFINE.BO has a market cap of 27.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while CAMLINFINE.BO trades at ₹140.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas CAMLINFINE.BO's P/E ratio is -180.58. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CAMLINFINE.BO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is more volatile compared to CAMLINFINE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check CAMLINFINE.BO's competition here
SRF.NS vs CAMLINFINE.NS Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, CAMLINFINE.NS has a market cap of 27B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while CAMLINFINE.NS trades at ₹140.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas CAMLINFINE.NS's P/E ratio is -175.49. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to CAMLINFINE.NS's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is more volatile compared to CAMLINFINE.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check CAMLINFINE.NS's competition here
SRF.NS vs SIRCA.BO Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, SIRCA.BO has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while SIRCA.BO trades at ₹464.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas SIRCA.BO's P/E ratio is 42.19. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SIRCA.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is more volatile compared to SIRCA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check SIRCA.BO's competition here
SRF.NS vs SIRCA.NS Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, SIRCA.NS has a market cap of 26.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while SIRCA.NS trades at ₹464.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas SIRCA.NS's P/E ratio is 41.98. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SIRCA.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is more volatile compared to SIRCA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check SIRCA.NS's competition here
SRF.NS vs PREMEXPLN.NS Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, PREMEXPLN.NS has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while PREMEXPLN.NS trades at ₹486.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas PREMEXPLN.NS's P/E ratio is 60.84. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PREMEXPLN.NS's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is less volatile compared to PREMEXPLN.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check PREMEXPLN.NS's competition here
SRF.NS vs PREMEXPLN.BO Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, PREMEXPLN.BO has a market cap of 26.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while PREMEXPLN.BO trades at ₹486.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas PREMEXPLN.BO's P/E ratio is 60.98. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to PREMEXPLN.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is less volatile compared to PREMEXPLN.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check PREMEXPLN.BO's competition here
SRF.NS vs FISCHER.BO Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, FISCHER.BO has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while FISCHER.BO trades at ₹40.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas FISCHER.BO's P/E ratio is 68.22. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to FISCHER.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is less volatile compared to FISCHER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check FISCHER.BO's competition here
SRF.NS vs JUBLINDS.NS Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, JUBLINDS.NS has a market cap of 25.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while JUBLINDS.NS trades at ₹1,633.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas JUBLINDS.NS's P/E ratio is 72.49. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to JUBLINDS.NS's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is less volatile compared to JUBLINDS.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check JUBLINDS.NS's competition here
SRF.NS vs POLYPLEX.NS Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, POLYPLEX.NS has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while POLYPLEX.NS trades at ₹808.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas POLYPLEX.NS's P/E ratio is 84.16. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to POLYPLEX.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is more volatile compared to POLYPLEX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check POLYPLEX.NS's competition here
SRF.NS vs SOTL.NS Comparison February 2026
SRF.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SRF.NS stands at 765.8B. In comparison, SOTL.NS has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SRF.NS is priced at ₹2,583.60, while SOTL.NS trades at ₹370.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SRF.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 43.08, whereas SOTL.NS's P/E ratio is 18.27. In terms of profitability, SRF.NS's ROE is +0.14%, compared to SOTL.NS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SRF.NS is more volatile compared to SOTL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SRF.NS.Check SOTL.NS's competition here