SeqLL Inc.
SeqLL Inc. SQL Peers
See (SQL) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Medical - Diagnostics & Research Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SQL | $6.60 | -2.38% | 2.5M | -0.40 | -$16.40 | N/A |
| DHR-PB | $1,261.26 | -0.78% | 916.8B | 146.01 | $8.64 | +0.71% |
| TMO | $434.86 | +0.96% | 164.1B | 25.49 | $17.06 | +0.47% |
| DHR | $204.85 | -0.32% | 146.5B | 39.67 | $5.16 | +0.71% |
| IDXX | $533.37 | -1.43% | 42.9B | 49.33 | $10.81 | N/A |
| A | $123.28 | -0.72% | 35B | 30.43 | $4.05 | +0.99% |
| IQV | $162.80 | -1.65% | 28.2B | 22.20 | $7.33 | N/A |
| MTD | $1,223.93 | -1.00% | 25.4B | 30.54 | $40.06 | N/A |
| NTRA | $160.43 | -1.79% | 21.9B | -109.18 | -$1.47 | N/A |
| WAT | $352.91 | -0.10% | 21B | 32.01 | $11.03 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SQL vs DHR-PB Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, DHR-PB has a market cap of 916.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while DHR-PB trades at $1,261.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas DHR-PB's P/E ratio is 146.01. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to DHR-PB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to DHR-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs TMO Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, TMO has a market cap of 164.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while TMO trades at $434.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas TMO's P/E ratio is 25.49. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to TMO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to TMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs DHR Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, DHR has a market cap of 146.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while DHR trades at $204.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas DHR's P/E ratio is 39.67. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to DHR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to DHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs IDXX Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, IDXX has a market cap of 42.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while IDXX trades at $533.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas IDXX's P/E ratio is 49.33. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to IDXX's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to IDXX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs A Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, A has a market cap of 35B. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while A trades at $123.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas A's P/E ratio is 30.43. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to A's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs IQV Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, IQV has a market cap of 28.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while IQV trades at $162.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas IQV's P/E ratio is 22.20. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to IQV's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to IQV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs MTD Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, MTD has a market cap of 25.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while MTD trades at $1,223.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas MTD's P/E ratio is 30.54. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to MTD's ROE of +1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to MTD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs NTRA Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, NTRA has a market cap of 21.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while NTRA trades at $160.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas NTRA's P/E ratio is -109.18. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to NTRA's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to NTRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs WAT Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, WAT has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while WAT trades at $352.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas WAT's P/E ratio is 32.01. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to WAT's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to WAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs DGX Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, DGX has a market cap of 18.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while DGX trades at $168.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas DGX's P/E ratio is 21.25. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to DGX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to DGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs ILMN Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, ILMN has a market cap of 15.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while ILMN trades at $99.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas ILMN's P/E ratio is -16.32. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to ILMN's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to ILMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs PKI Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, PKI has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while PKI trades at $115.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas PKI's P/E ratio is 41.45. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to PKI's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to PKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs ICLR Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, ICLR has a market cap of 12.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while ICLR trades at $150.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas ICLR's P/E ratio is 16.40. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to ICLR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to ICLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs RVTY Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, RVTY has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while RVTY trades at $101.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas RVTY's P/E ratio is 41.95. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to RVTY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to RVTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs QGEN Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, QGEN has a market cap of 10.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while QGEN trades at $48.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas QGEN's P/E ratio is 111.88. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to QGEN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to QGEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs EXAS Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, EXAS has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while EXAS trades at $51.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas EXAS's P/E ratio is -9.39. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to EXAS's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to EXAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs TEM Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, TEM has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while TEM trades at $56.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas TEM's P/E ratio is -11.02. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to TEM's ROE of -5.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to TEM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs MEDP Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, MEDP has a market cap of 9.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while MEDP trades at $323.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas MEDP's P/E ratio is 24.68. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to MEDP's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to MEDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs CRL Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, CRL has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while CRL trades at $159.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas CRL's P/E ratio is -257.17. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to CRL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to CRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs GH Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, GH has a market cap of 6.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while GH trades at $50.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas GH's P/E ratio is -14.82. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to GH's ROE of +3.69%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to GH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs SYNH Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, SYNH has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while SYNH trades at $42.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas SYNH's P/E ratio is 61.40. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to SYNH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to SYNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs RDNT Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, RDNT has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while RDNT trades at $55.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas RDNT's P/E ratio is -129.02. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to RDNT's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to RDNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs SHC Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, SHC has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while SHC trades at $11.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas SHC's P/E ratio is 131.28. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to SHC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to SHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs OLK Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, OLK has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while OLK trades at $26.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas OLK's P/E ratio is -96.59. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to OLK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to OLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs TWST Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, TWST has a market cap of 2.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while TWST trades at $38.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas TWST's P/E ratio is -11.70. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to TWST's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to TWST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs VIVO Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, VIVO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while VIVO trades at $33.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas VIVO's P/E ratio is 21.09. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to VIVO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to VIVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs GRAL Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, GRAL has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while GRAL trades at $40.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas GRAL's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to GRAL's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to GRAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs NEOG Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, NEOG has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while NEOG trades at $5.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas NEOG's P/E ratio is -2.41. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to NEOG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to NEOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs CDNA Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, CDNA has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while CDNA trades at $20.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas CDNA's P/E ratio is 17.99. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to CDNA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to CDNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs OPK Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, OPK has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while OPK trades at $1.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas OPK's P/E ratio is -22.53. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to OPK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to OPK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs FLGT Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, FLGT has a market cap of 587M. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while FLGT trades at $19.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas FLGT's P/E ratio is -14.50. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to FLGT's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to FLGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs GRALV Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, GRALV has a market cap of 579.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while GRALV trades at $18.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas GRALV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to GRALV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to GRALV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs CSTL Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, CSTL has a market cap of 567.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while CSTL trades at $19.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas CSTL's P/E ratio is -103.53. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to CSTL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to CSTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs PSNL Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, PSNL has a market cap of 563.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while PSNL trades at $6.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas PSNL's P/E ratio is -4.94. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to PSNL's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to PSNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs LAB Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, LAB has a market cap of 501.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while LAB trades at $1.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas LAB's P/E ratio is -4.12. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to LAB's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to LAB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs MYGN Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, MYGN has a market cap of 492.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while MYGN trades at $5.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas MYGN's P/E ratio is -4.77. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to MYGN's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to MYGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs CO Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, CO has a market cap of 400.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while CO trades at $2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas CO's P/E ratio is 5.06. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to CO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is less volatile compared to CO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs FLDM Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, FLDM has a market cap of 294.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while FLDM trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas FLDM's P/E ratio is -4.74. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to FLDM's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to FLDM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs STIM Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, STIM has a market cap of 235.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while STIM trades at $3.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas STIM's P/E ratio is -2.71. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to STIM's ROE of -2.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to STIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs NEO Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, NEO has a market cap of 187M. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while NEO trades at $7.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas NEO's P/E ratio is -11.91. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to NEO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to NEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs ACRS Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, ACRS has a market cap of 170.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while ACRS trades at $1.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas ACRS's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to ACRS's ROE of -0.92%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to ACRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs XGN Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, XGN has a market cap of 152.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while XGN trades at $6.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas XGN's P/E ratio is -8.32. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to XGN's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to XGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs ATLN Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, ATLN has a market cap of 132.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while ATLN trades at $2.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas ATLN's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to ATLN's ROE of -42.96%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to ATLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs GTH Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, GTH has a market cap of 127.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while GTH trades at $4.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas GTH's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to GTH's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to GTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs GENE Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, GENE has a market cap of 111.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while GENE trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas GENE's P/E ratio is -38.25. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to GENE's ROE of -3.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to GENE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs MDXH Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, MDXH has a market cap of 107.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while MDXH trades at $2.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas MDXH's P/E ratio is -2.10. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to MDXH's ROE of -5.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to MDXH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs SERA Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, SERA has a market cap of 103.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while SERA trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas SERA's P/E ratio is -3.01. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to SERA's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to SERA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs PRE Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, PRE has a market cap of 103.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while PRE trades at $7.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas PRE's P/E ratio is -2.09. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to PRE's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to PRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs PRENW Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, PRENW has a market cap of 88.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while PRENW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas PRENW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to PRENW's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to PRENW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs NOTV Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, NOTV has a market cap of 69M. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while NOTV trades at $2.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas NOTV's P/E ratio is -0.64. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to NOTV's ROE of -0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to NOTV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs VNRX Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, VNRX has a market cap of 68.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while VNRX trades at $0.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas VNRX's P/E ratio is -2.47. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to VNRX's ROE of +1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to VNRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs BDSX Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, BDSX has a market cap of 45.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while BDSX trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas BDSX's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to BDSX's ROE of -1.68%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to BDSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs OPGN Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, OPGN has a market cap of 40.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while OPGN trades at $4.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas OPGN's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to OPGN's ROE of +1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to OPGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs DRIO Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, DRIO has a market cap of 32M. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while DRIO trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas DRIO's P/E ratio is -1.31. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to DRIO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to DRIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs STRRP Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, STRRP has a market cap of 29.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while STRRP trades at $9.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas STRRP's P/E ratio is -4.62. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to STRRP's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to STRRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs AKU Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, AKU has a market cap of 26.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while AKU trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas AKU's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to AKU's ROE of -5.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is less volatile compared to AKU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs PRPO Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, PRPO has a market cap of 23.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while PRPO trades at $15.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas PRPO's P/E ratio is -7.56. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to PRPO's ROE of -0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to PRPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs CEMI Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, CEMI has a market cap of 16.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while CEMI trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas CEMI's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to CEMI's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to CEMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs ENZ Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, ENZ has a market cap of 16.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while ENZ trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas ENZ's P/E ratio is -2.24. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to ENZ's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is less volatile compared to ENZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs ADVB Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, ADVB has a market cap of 16.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while ADVB trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas ADVB's P/E ratio is -4.69. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to ADVB's ROE of -1.86%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to ADVB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs PMD Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, PMD has a market cap of 15.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while PMD trades at $2.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas PMD's P/E ratio is -5.24. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to PMD's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to PMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs TRIB Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, TRIB has a market cap of 14.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while TRIB trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas TRIB's P/E ratio is -0.44. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to TRIB's ROE of +1.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to TRIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs ME Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, ME has a market cap of 13.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while ME trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas ME's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to ME's ROE of -3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to ME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs INBS Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, INBS has a market cap of 12.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while INBS trades at $1.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas INBS's P/E ratio is -1.33. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to INBS's ROE of -1.72%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to INBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs BNGO Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, BNGO has a market cap of 11.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while BNGO trades at $3.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas BNGO's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to BNGO's ROE of -1.57%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to BNGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs CNTG Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, CNTG has a market cap of 9.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while CNTG trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas CNTG's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to CNTG's ROE of +3.98%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is less volatile compared to CNTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs BGLC Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, BGLC has a market cap of 9.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while BGLC trades at $5.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas BGLC's P/E ratio is -4.24. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to BGLC's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to BGLC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs BIAF Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, BIAF has a market cap of 8.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while BIAF trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas BIAF's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to BIAF's ROE of -3.68%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to BIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs MYNZ Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, MYNZ has a market cap of 7.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while MYNZ trades at $1.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas MYNZ's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to MYNZ's ROE of -22.70%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to MYNZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs STRR Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, STRR has a market cap of 6.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while STRR trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas STRR's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to STRR's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to STRR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs BIAFW Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, BIAFW has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while BIAFW trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas BIAFW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to BIAFW's ROE of -3.68%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to BIAFW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs NDRA Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, NDRA has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while NDRA trades at $8.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas NDRA's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to NDRA's ROE of -1.96%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to NDRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs NVTA Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, NVTA has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while NVTA trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas NVTA's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to NVTA's ROE of -2.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is less volatile compared to NVTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs LMDX Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, LMDX has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while LMDX trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas LMDX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to LMDX's ROE of -15.58%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is less volatile compared to LMDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs LMDXW Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, LMDXW has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while LMDXW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas LMDXW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to LMDXW's ROE of -15.58%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is less volatile compared to LMDXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs CHEK Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, CHEK has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while CHEK trades at $0.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas CHEK's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to CHEK's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to CHEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs BNR Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, BNR has a market cap of 4.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while BNR trades at $4.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas BNR's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to BNR's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to BNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs TTOO Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, TTOO has a market cap of 3.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while TTOO trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas TTOO's P/E ratio is -4.17. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to TTOO's ROE of +2.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to TTOO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs DMTK Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, DMTK has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while DMTK trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas DMTK's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to DMTK's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to DMTK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs AWH Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, AWH has a market cap of 2.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while AWH trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas AWH's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to AWH's ROE of +4.66%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to AWH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs APDN Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, APDN has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while APDN trades at $5.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas APDN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to APDN's ROE of -2.81%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to APDN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs ISPC Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, ISPC has a market cap of 2.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while ISPC trades at $1.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas ISPC's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to ISPC's ROE of -2.85%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is less volatile compared to ISPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs HTGM Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, HTGM has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while HTGM trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas HTGM's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to HTGM's ROE of -2.73%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to HTGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs BIOC Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, BIOC has a market cap of 450.8K. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while BIOC trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas BIOC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to BIOC's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to BIOC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs SQLLW Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, SQLLW has a market cap of 117.9K. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while SQLLW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas SQLLW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to SQLLW's ROE of -42.96%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to SQLLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs MEUSW Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, MEUSW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while MEUSW trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas MEUSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to MEUSW's ROE of -3.99%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is less volatile compared to MEUSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs OCDX Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, OCDX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while OCDX trades at $17.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas OCDX's P/E ratio is -42.28. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to OCDX's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to OCDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.
SQL vs DHR-PA Comparison
SQL plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SQL stands at 2.5M. In comparison, DHR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SQL is priced at $6.60, while DHR-PA trades at $1,841.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SQL currently has a P/E ratio of -0.40, whereas DHR-PA's P/E ratio is 233.57. In terms of profitability, SQL's ROE is +10.89%, compared to DHR-PA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SQL is more volatile compared to DHR-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SQL.