Standard BioTools Inc. (FLDM) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (FLDM) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Medical - Diagnostics & Research Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLDM | $3.71 | -7.02% | 294.2M | -4.74 | -$0.78 | N/A |
| DHR-PB | $1,261.26 | -0.78% | 916.8B | 146.01 | $8.64 | +0.72% |
| TMO | $529.88 | +0.54% | 196.4B | 22.82 | $23.16 | +0.34% |
| DHR | $199.56 | +0.26% | 141.7B | 25.09 | $7.98 | +0.72% |
| IDXX | $547.93 | -2.78% | 44.5B | 41.54 | $13.58 | N/A |
| NTRA | $272.45 | +0.93% | 39.1B | -171.63 | -$1.59 | N/A |
| A | $133.61 | -0.51% | 37.8B | 23.07 | $5.81 | +0.76% |
| IQV | $205.20 | -1.28% | 34.6B | 17.10 | $12.13 | N/A |
| ILMN | $190.24 | +0.02% | 28.8B | 37.78 | $5.03 | N/A |
| MTD | $1,291.34 | -0.37% | 26.3B | 29.87 | $43.51 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
FLDM vs DHR-PB Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, DHR-PB has a market cap of 916.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while DHR-PB trades at $1,261.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas DHR-PB's P/E ratio is 146.01. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DHR-PB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to DHR-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check DHR-PB's competition here
FLDM vs TMO Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, TMO has a market cap of 196.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while TMO trades at $529.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas TMO's P/E ratio is 22.82. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TMO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to TMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check TMO's competition here
FLDM vs DHR Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, DHR has a market cap of 141.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while DHR trades at $199.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas DHR's P/E ratio is 25.09. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DHR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to DHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check DHR's competition here
FLDM vs IDXX Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, IDXX has a market cap of 44.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while IDXX trades at $547.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas IDXX's P/E ratio is 41.54. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IDXX's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to IDXX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check IDXX's competition here
FLDM vs NTRA Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, NTRA has a market cap of 39.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while NTRA trades at $272.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas NTRA's P/E ratio is -171.63. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NTRA's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to NTRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check NTRA's competition here
FLDM vs A Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, A has a market cap of 37.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while A trades at $133.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas A's P/E ratio is 23.07. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to A's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check A's competition here
FLDM vs IQV Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, IQV has a market cap of 34.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while IQV trades at $205.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas IQV's P/E ratio is 17.10. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IQV's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to IQV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check IQV's competition here
FLDM vs ILMN Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, ILMN has a market cap of 28.8B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while ILMN trades at $190.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas ILMN's P/E ratio is 37.78. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ILMN's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to ILMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check ILMN's competition here
FLDM vs MTD Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, MTD has a market cap of 26.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while MTD trades at $1,291.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas MTD's P/E ratio is 29.87. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MTD's ROE of -6.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to MTD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check MTD's competition here
FLDM vs WAT Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, WAT has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while WAT trades at $371.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas WAT's P/E ratio is 27.48. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to WAT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to WAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check WAT's competition here
FLDM vs DGX Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, DGX has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while DGX trades at $203.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas DGX's P/E ratio is 20.45. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DGX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to DGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check DGX's competition here
FLDM vs LH Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, LH has a market cap of 22.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while LH trades at $268.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas LH's P/E ratio is 16.42. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to LH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check LH's competition here
FLDM vs GH Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, GH has a market cap of 21B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while GH trades at $159.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas GH's P/E ratio is -61.40. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GH's ROE of +1.84%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to GH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check GH's competition here
FLDM vs EXAS Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, EXAS has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while EXAS trades at $104.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas EXAS's P/E ratio is -95.37. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to EXAS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to EXAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check EXAS's competition here
FLDM vs ILMNV Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, ILMNV has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while ILMNV trades at $107.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas ILMNV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ILMNV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to ILMNV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check ILMNV's competition here
FLDM vs MEDP Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, MEDP has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while MEDP trades at $526.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas MEDP's P/E ratio is 33.32. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MEDP's ROE of +1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to MEDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check MEDP's competition here
FLDM vs PKI Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, PKI has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while PKI trades at $115.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas PKI's P/E ratio is 41.45. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PKI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to PKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check PKI's competition here
FLDM vs ICLR Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, ICLR has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while ICLR trades at $164.97.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas ICLR's P/E ratio is 13.55. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ICLR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to ICLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check ICLR's competition here
FLDM vs RVTY Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, RVTY has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while RVTY trades at $110.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas RVTY's P/E ratio is 21.69. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RVTY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to RVTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check RVTY's competition here
FLDM vs CRL Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, CRL has a market cap of 11.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while CRL trades at $228.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas CRL's P/E ratio is 22.97. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CRL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to CRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check CRL's competition here
FLDM vs QGEN Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, QGEN has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while QGEN trades at $40.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas QGEN's P/E ratio is 17.27. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to QGEN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to QGEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check QGEN's competition here
FLDM vs BLLN Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, BLLN has a market cap of 5.7B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while BLLN trades at $122.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas BLLN's P/E ratio is 224.09. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BLLN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to BLLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check BLLN's competition here
FLDM vs TWST Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, TWST has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while TWST trades at $93.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas TWST's P/E ratio is -44.29. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TWST's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to TWST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check TWST's competition here
FLDM vs SHC Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, SHC has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while SHC trades at $17.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas SHC's P/E ratio is 20.19. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SHC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to SHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check SHC's competition here
FLDM vs RDNT Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, RDNT has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while RDNT trades at $63.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas RDNT's P/E ratio is 137.63. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to RDNT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to RDNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check RDNT's competition here
FLDM vs VCYT Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, VCYT has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while VCYT trades at $57.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas VCYT's P/E ratio is 28.74. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to VCYT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to VCYT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check VCYT's competition here
FLDM vs SYNH Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, SYNH has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while SYNH trades at $42.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas SYNH's P/E ratio is 61.40. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SYNH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to SYNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check SYNH's competition here
FLDM vs OLK Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, OLK has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while OLK trades at $26.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas OLK's P/E ratio is -96.59. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OLK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to OLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check OLK's competition here
FLDM vs NEOG Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, NEOG has a market cap of 2.1B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while NEOG trades at $9.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas NEOG's P/E ratio is 34.46. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NEOG's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to NEOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check NEOG's competition here
FLDM vs CDNA Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, CDNA has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while CDNA trades at $28.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas CDNA's P/E ratio is 34.24. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CDNA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to CDNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check CDNA's competition here
FLDM vs PSNL Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, PSNL has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while PSNL trades at $15.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas PSNL's P/E ratio is -14.75. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PSNL's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to PSNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check PSNL's competition here
FLDM vs CSTL Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, CSTL has a market cap of 697M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while CSTL trades at $23.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas CSTL's P/E ratio is -52.23. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CSTL's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to CSTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check CSTL's competition here
FLDM vs FLGT Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, FLGT has a market cap of 579.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while FLGT trades at $20.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas FLGT's P/E ratio is 2042.00. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to FLGT's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to FLGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check FLGT's competition here
FLDM vs GRALV Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, GRALV has a market cap of 579.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while GRALV trades at $18.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas GRALV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GRALV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to GRALV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check GRALV's competition here
FLDM vs MYGN Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, MYGN has a market cap of 553.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while MYGN trades at $5.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas MYGN's P/E ratio is -45.08. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MYGN's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to MYGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check MYGN's competition here
FLDM vs CO Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, CO has a market cap of 400.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while CO trades at $2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas CO's P/E ratio is 5.06. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is less volatile compared to CO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check CO's competition here
FLDM vs NEO Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, NEO has a market cap of 367.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while NEO trades at $14.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas NEO's P/E ratio is 108.54. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NEO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to NEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check NEO's competition here
FLDM vs PRE Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, PRE has a market cap of 317.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while PRE trades at $18.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas PRE's P/E ratio is -9.07. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PRE's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to PRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check PRE's competition here
FLDM vs PRENW Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, PRENW has a market cap of 272.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while PRENW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas PRENW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PRENW's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is less volatile compared to PRENW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check PRENW's competition here
FLDM vs BDSX Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, BDSX has a market cap of 174.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while BDSX trades at $21.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas BDSX's P/E ratio is -5.28. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BDSX's ROE of -21.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to BDSX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check BDSX's competition here
FLDM vs GTH Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, GTH has a market cap of 127.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while GTH trades at $4.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas GTH's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GTH's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to GTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check GTH's competition here
FLDM vs STIM Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, STIM has a market cap of 124.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while STIM trades at $1.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas STIM's P/E ratio is -3.31. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to STIM's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to STIM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check STIM's competition here
FLDM vs IMDX Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, IMDX has a market cap of 123.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while IMDX trades at $4.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas IMDX's P/E ratio is -3.86. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to IMDX's ROE of +3.81%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to IMDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check IMDX's competition here
FLDM vs GENE Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, GENE has a market cap of 111.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while GENE trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas GENE's P/E ratio is -38.25. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to GENE's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to GENE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check GENE's competition here
FLDM vs XGN Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, XGN has a market cap of 100M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while XGN trades at $4.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas XGN's P/E ratio is -5.59. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to XGN's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to XGN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check XGN's competition here
FLDM vs SERA Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, SERA has a market cap of 73.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while SERA trades at $1.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas SERA's P/E ratio is -2.95. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SERA's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to SERA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check SERA's competition here
FLDM vs ATLN Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, ATLN has a market cap of 73.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while ATLN trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas ATLN's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ATLN's ROE of +14.94%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is less volatile compared to ATLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check ATLN's competition here
FLDM vs DRIO Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, DRIO has a market cap of 51M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while DRIO trades at $6.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas DRIO's P/E ratio is -1.19. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DRIO's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to DRIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check DRIO's competition here
FLDM vs PRPO Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, PRPO has a market cap of 42.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while PRPO trades at $23.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas PRPO's P/E ratio is -92.31. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PRPO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to PRPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check PRPO's competition here
FLDM vs STRRP Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, STRRP has a market cap of 41.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while STRRP trades at $9.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas STRRP's P/E ratio is -18.43. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to STRRP's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to STRRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check STRRP's competition here
FLDM vs STRR Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, STRR has a market cap of 41.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while STRR trades at $11.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas STRR's P/E ratio is -11.80. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to STRR's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to STRR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check STRR's competition here
FLDM vs AKU Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, AKU has a market cap of 26.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while AKU trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas AKU's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AKU's ROE of -5.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is less volatile compared to AKU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check AKU's competition here
FLDM vs MDXH Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, MDXH has a market cap of 22.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while MDXH trades at $0.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas MDXH's P/E ratio is -1.13. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MDXH's ROE of +4.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to MDXH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check MDXH's competition here
FLDM vs CEMI Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, CEMI has a market cap of 16.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while CEMI trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas CEMI's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CEMI's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to CEMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check CEMI's competition here
FLDM vs ENZ Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, ENZ has a market cap of 16.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while ENZ trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas ENZ's P/E ratio is -2.24. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ENZ's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is less volatile compared to ENZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check ENZ's competition here
FLDM vs QUCY Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, QUCY has a market cap of 15.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while QUCY trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas QUCY's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to QUCY's ROE of -3.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to QUCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check QUCY's competition here
FLDM vs PMD Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, PMD has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while PMD trades at $2.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas PMD's P/E ratio is -5.24. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PMD's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to PMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check PMD's competition here
FLDM vs ME Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, ME has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while ME trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas ME's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ME's ROE of -42.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to ME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check ME's competition here
FLDM vs MYNZ Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, MYNZ has a market cap of 14.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while MYNZ trades at $3.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas MYNZ's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MYNZ's ROE of -10.25%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is less volatile compared to MYNZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check MYNZ's competition here
FLDM vs BNGO Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, BNGO has a market cap of 13.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while BNGO trades at $1.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas BNGO's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BNGO's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to BNGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check BNGO's competition here
FLDM vs BNR Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, BNR has a market cap of 11.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while BNR trades at $9.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas BNR's P/E ratio is -13.15. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BNR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to BNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check BNR's competition here
FLDM vs CHEK Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, CHEK has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while CHEK trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas CHEK's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CHEK's ROE of -2.26%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to CHEK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check CHEK's competition here
FLDM vs CNTG Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, CNTG has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while CNTG trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas CNTG's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CNTG's ROE of +3.98%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to CNTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check CNTG's competition here
FLDM vs APDN Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, APDN has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while APDN trades at $5.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas APDN's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to APDN's ROE of -6.53%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is less volatile compared to APDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check APDN's competition here
FLDM vs MBAI Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, MBAI has a market cap of 6.6M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while MBAI trades at $1.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas MBAI's P/E ratio is 1.69. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MBAI's ROE of +4.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to MBAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check MBAI's competition here
FLDM vs ADVB Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, ADVB has a market cap of 5.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while ADVB trades at $5.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas ADVB's P/E ratio is -46.36. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ADVB's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to ADVB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check ADVB's competition here
FLDM vs NVTA Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, NVTA has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while NVTA trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas NVTA's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NVTA's ROE of -2.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is less volatile compared to NVTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check NVTA's competition here
FLDM vs LMDXW Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, LMDXW has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while LMDXW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas LMDXW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LMDXW's ROE of -15.58%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is less volatile compared to LMDXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check LMDXW's competition here
FLDM vs LMDX Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, LMDX has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while LMDX trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas LMDX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to LMDX's ROE of -15.58%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is less volatile compared to LMDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check LMDX's competition here
FLDM vs NDRA Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, NDRA has a market cap of 4.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while NDRA trades at $5.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas NDRA's P/E ratio is -0.70. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NDRA's ROE of -5.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to NDRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check NDRA's competition here
FLDM vs TRIB Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, TRIB has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while TRIB trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas TRIB's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to TRIB's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to TRIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check TRIB's competition here
FLDM vs DMTK Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, DMTK has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while DMTK trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas DMTK's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DMTK's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is less volatile compared to DMTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check DMTK's competition here
FLDM vs BIAF Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, BIAF has a market cap of 3.2M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while BIAF trades at $0.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas BIAF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BIAF's ROE of -3.59%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to BIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check BIAF's competition here
FLDM vs NOTV Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, NOTV has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while NOTV trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas NOTV's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NOTV's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is less volatile compared to NOTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check NOTV's competition here
FLDM vs SQL Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, SQL has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while SQL trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas SQL's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SQL's ROE of +38.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is less volatile compared to SQL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check SQL's competition here
FLDM vs AWH Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, AWH has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while AWH trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas AWH's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to AWH's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to AWH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check AWH's competition here
FLDM vs INBS Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, INBS has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while INBS trades at $2.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas INBS's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to INBS's ROE of -1.74%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to INBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check INBS's competition here
FLDM vs HTGM Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, HTGM has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while HTGM trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas HTGM's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to HTGM's ROE of -2.73%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to HTGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check HTGM's competition here
FLDM vs BIOC Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, BIOC has a market cap of 450.8K. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while BIOC trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas BIOC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BIOC's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is less volatile compared to BIOC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check BIOC's competition here
FLDM vs ISPC Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, ISPC has a market cap of 324.9K. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while ISPC trades at $2.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas ISPC's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to ISPC's ROE of -5.85%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to ISPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check ISPC's competition here
FLDM vs SQLLW Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, SQLLW has a market cap of 179.6K. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while SQLLW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas SQLLW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to SQLLW's ROE of +38.02%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is less volatile compared to SQLLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check SQLLW's competition here
FLDM vs OCDX Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, OCDX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while OCDX trades at $17.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas OCDX's P/E ratio is -42.28. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to OCDX's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to OCDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check OCDX's competition here
FLDM vs DHR-PA Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, DHR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while DHR-PA trades at $1,841.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas DHR-PA's P/E ratio is 233.57. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to DHR-PA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to DHR-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check DHR-PA's competition here
FLDM vs NDRAW Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, NDRAW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while NDRAW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas NDRAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to NDRAW's ROE of -5.13%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is less volatile compared to NDRAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check NDRAW's competition here
FLDM vs BNGOW Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, BNGOW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while BNGOW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas BNGOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to BNGOW's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is less volatile compared to BNGOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check BNGOW's competition here
FLDM vs PRXL Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, PRXL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while PRXL trades at $88.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas PRXL's P/E ratio is 43.49. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to PRXL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is more volatile compared to PRXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check PRXL's competition here
FLDM vs MEUSW Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, MEUSW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while MEUSW trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas MEUSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to MEUSW's ROE of -42.03%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is less volatile compared to MEUSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check MEUSW's competition here
FLDM vs CHEKZ Comparison July 2026
FLDM plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, FLDM stands at 294.2M. In comparison, CHEKZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, FLDM is priced at $3.71, while CHEKZ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
FLDM currently has a P/E ratio of -4.74, whereas CHEKZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, FLDM's ROE is +0.17%, compared to CHEKZ's ROE of +4.17%. Regarding short-term risk, FLDM is less volatile compared to CHEKZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for FLDM.Check CHEKZ's competition here