Labcorp Holdings Inc. (LH) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (LH) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Medical - Diagnostics & Research Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LH | $271.99 | -1.34% | 22.3B | 16.14 | $16.85 | +1.04% |
| DHR-PB | $1,261.26 | -0.78% | 916.8B | 146.01 | $8.64 | +0.72% |
| TMO | $535.29 | +0.23% | 198.9B | 23.11 | $23.16 | +0.34% |
| DHR | $200.79 | +0.87% | 142.1B | 25.16 | $7.98 | +0.72% |
| IDXX | $557.02 | +3.02% | 43.9B | 41.02 | $13.58 | N/A |
| NTRA | $277.37 | +1.73% | 39.7B | -174.45 | -$1.59 | N/A |
| A | $134.71 | -0.36% | 38B | 23.18 | $5.81 | +0.75% |
| IQV | $206.81 | -0.49% | 34.5B | 17.06 | $12.13 | N/A |
| ILMN | $187.15 | -2.12% | 28.3B | 37.21 | $5.03 | N/A |
| MTD | $1,316.55 | +0.13% | 26.6B | 30.25 | $43.51 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
LH vs DHR-PB Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, DHR-PB has a market cap of 916.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while DHR-PB trades at $1,261.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas DHR-PB's P/E ratio is 146.01. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DHR-PB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is more volatile compared to DHR-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check DHR-PB's competition here
LH vs TMO Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, TMO has a market cap of 198.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while TMO trades at $535.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas TMO's P/E ratio is 23.11. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TMO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is more volatile compared to TMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check TMO's competition here
LH vs DHR Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, DHR has a market cap of 142.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while DHR trades at $200.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas DHR's P/E ratio is 25.16. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DHR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is more volatile compared to DHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check DHR's competition here
LH vs IDXX Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, IDXX has a market cap of 43.9B. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while IDXX trades at $557.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas IDXX's P/E ratio is 41.02. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IDXX's ROE of +0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is less volatile compared to IDXX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check IDXX's competition here
LH vs NTRA Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, NTRA has a market cap of 39.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while NTRA trades at $277.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas NTRA's P/E ratio is -174.45. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NTRA's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is less volatile compared to NTRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check NTRA's competition here
LH vs A Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, A has a market cap of 38B. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while A trades at $134.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas A's P/E ratio is 23.18. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to A's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is less volatile compared to A. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check A's competition here
LH vs IQV Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, IQV has a market cap of 34.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while IQV trades at $206.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas IQV's P/E ratio is 17.06. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IQV's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is less volatile compared to IQV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check IQV's competition here
LH vs ILMN Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, ILMN has a market cap of 28.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while ILMN trades at $187.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas ILMN's P/E ratio is 37.21. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ILMN's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is less volatile compared to ILMN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check ILMN's competition here
LH vs MTD Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, MTD has a market cap of 26.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while MTD trades at $1,316.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas MTD's P/E ratio is 30.25. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MTD's ROE of -6.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is more volatile compared to MTD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check MTD's competition here
LH vs WAT Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, WAT has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while WAT trades at $374.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas WAT's P/E ratio is 27.61. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to WAT's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is less volatile compared to WAT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check WAT's competition here
LH vs DGX Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, DGX has a market cap of 22.3B. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while DGX trades at $201.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas DGX's P/E ratio is 19.91. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DGX's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is less volatile compared to DGX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check DGX's competition here
LH vs GH Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, GH has a market cap of 21.6B. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while GH trades at $162.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas GH's P/E ratio is -63.16. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GH's ROE of +1.84%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is less volatile compared to GH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check GH's competition here
LH vs EXAS Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, EXAS has a market cap of 20B. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while EXAS trades at $104.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas EXAS's P/E ratio is -95.37. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EXAS's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is more volatile compared to EXAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check EXAS's competition here
LH vs ILMNV Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, ILMNV has a market cap of 17B. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while ILMNV trades at $107.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas ILMNV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ILMNV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LH is more volatile compared to ILMNV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check ILMNV's competition here
LH vs MEDP Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, MEDP has a market cap of 15.1B. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while MEDP trades at $529.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas MEDP's P/E ratio is 33.26. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MEDP's ROE of +1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is less volatile compared to MEDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check MEDP's competition here
LH vs PKI Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, PKI has a market cap of 14.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while PKI trades at $115.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas PKI's P/E ratio is 41.45. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PKI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is less volatile compared to PKI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check PKI's competition here
LH vs ICLR Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, ICLR has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while ICLR trades at $172.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas ICLR's P/E ratio is 14.04. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ICLR's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is less volatile compared to ICLR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check ICLR's competition here
LH vs RVTY Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, RVTY has a market cap of 12.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while RVTY trades at $111.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas RVTY's P/E ratio is 21.74. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RVTY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is more volatile compared to RVTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check RVTY's competition here
LH vs CRL Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, CRL has a market cap of 11B. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while CRL trades at $228.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas CRL's P/E ratio is 22.82. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CRL's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is less volatile compared to CRL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check CRL's competition here
LH vs QGEN Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, QGEN has a market cap of 8.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while QGEN trades at $41.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas QGEN's P/E ratio is 17.25. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to QGEN's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is less volatile compared to QGEN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check QGEN's competition here
LH vs BLLN Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, BLLN has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while BLLN trades at $129.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas BLLN's P/E ratio is 236.15. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BLLN's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is less volatile compared to BLLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check BLLN's competition here
LH vs TWST Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, TWST has a market cap of 5.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while TWST trades at $92.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas TWST's P/E ratio is -45.40. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TWST's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is less volatile compared to TWST. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check TWST's competition here
LH vs SHC Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, SHC has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while SHC trades at $18.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas SHC's P/E ratio is 20.17. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SHC's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is less volatile compared to SHC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check SHC's competition here
LH vs RDNT Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, RDNT has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while RDNT trades at $61.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas RDNT's P/E ratio is 133.50. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to RDNT's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is less volatile compared to RDNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check RDNT's competition here
LH vs VCYT Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, VCYT has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while VCYT trades at $59.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas VCYT's P/E ratio is 29.76. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to VCYT's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is less volatile compared to VCYT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check VCYT's competition here
LH vs SYNH Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, SYNH has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while SYNH trades at $42.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas SYNH's P/E ratio is 61.40. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SYNH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is more volatile compared to SYNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check SYNH's competition here
LH vs OLK Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, OLK has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while OLK trades at $26.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas OLK's P/E ratio is -96.59. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OLK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is more volatile compared to OLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check OLK's competition here
LH vs NEOG Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, NEOG has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while NEOG trades at $9.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas NEOG's P/E ratio is 35.64. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NEOG's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is less volatile compared to NEOG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check NEOG's competition here
LH vs CDNA Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, CDNA has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while CDNA trades at $29.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas CDNA's P/E ratio is 35.42. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CDNA's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is less volatile compared to CDNA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check CDNA's competition here
LH vs PSNL Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, PSNL has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while PSNL trades at $15.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas PSNL's P/E ratio is -15.48. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PSNL's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is less volatile compared to PSNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check PSNL's competition here
LH vs CSTL Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, CSTL has a market cap of 728.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while CSTL trades at $24.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas CSTL's P/E ratio is -54.59. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CSTL's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is less volatile compared to CSTL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check CSTL's competition here
LH vs FLGT Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, FLGT has a market cap of 596.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while FLGT trades at $21.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas FLGT's P/E ratio is 2101.00. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FLGT's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is less volatile compared to FLGT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check FLGT's competition here
LH vs MYGN Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, MYGN has a market cap of 596M. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while MYGN trades at $6.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas MYGN's P/E ratio is -48.54. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MYGN's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is less volatile compared to MYGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check MYGN's competition here
LH vs GRALV Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, GRALV has a market cap of 579.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while GRALV trades at $18.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas GRALV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GRALV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, LH is less volatile compared to GRALV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check GRALV's competition here
LH vs CO Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, CO has a market cap of 400.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while CO trades at $2.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas CO's P/E ratio is 5.06. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is less volatile compared to CO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check CO's competition here
LH vs NEO Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, NEO has a market cap of 377.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while NEO trades at $14.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas NEO's P/E ratio is 111.54. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NEO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is less volatile compared to NEO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check NEO's competition here
LH vs PRENW Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, PRENW has a market cap of 369.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while PRENW trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas PRENW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PRENW's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is less volatile compared to PRENW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check PRENW's competition here
LH vs PRE Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, PRE has a market cap of 332.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while PRE trades at $19.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas PRE's P/E ratio is -9.50. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PRE's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is less volatile compared to PRE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check PRE's competition here
LH vs FLDM Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, FLDM has a market cap of 294.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while FLDM trades at $3.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas FLDM's P/E ratio is -4.74. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FLDM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is less volatile compared to FLDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check FLDM's competition here
LH vs BDSX Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, BDSX has a market cap of 170.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while BDSX trades at $21.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas BDSX's P/E ratio is -5.17. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BDSX's ROE of -21.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is less volatile compared to BDSX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check BDSX's competition here
LH vs IMDX Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, IMDX has a market cap of 129.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while IMDX trades at $4.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas IMDX's P/E ratio is -4.05. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to IMDX's ROE of +3.81%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is less volatile compared to IMDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check IMDX's competition here
LH vs STIM Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, STIM has a market cap of 128M. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while STIM trades at $1.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas STIM's P/E ratio is -3.41. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to STIM's ROE of -1.65%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is less volatile compared to STIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check STIM's competition here
LH vs GTH Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, GTH has a market cap of 127.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while GTH trades at $4.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas GTH's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GTH's ROE of -1.01%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is more volatile compared to GTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check GTH's competition here
LH vs GENE Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, GENE has a market cap of 111.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while GENE trades at $0.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas GENE's P/E ratio is -38.25. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to GENE's ROE of -1.85%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is more volatile compared to GENE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check GENE's competition here
LH vs XGN Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, XGN has a market cap of 103.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while XGN trades at $4.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas XGN's P/E ratio is -5.81. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to XGN's ROE of -1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is less volatile compared to XGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check XGN's competition here
LH vs SERA Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, SERA has a market cap of 82.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while SERA trades at $2.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas SERA's P/E ratio is -3.32. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SERA's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is less volatile compared to SERA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check SERA's competition here
LH vs ATLN Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, ATLN has a market cap of 73.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while ATLN trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas ATLN's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ATLN's ROE of +14.94%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is less volatile compared to ATLN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check ATLN's competition here
LH vs DRIO Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, DRIO has a market cap of 49.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while DRIO trades at $6.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas DRIO's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DRIO's ROE of +0.93%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is less volatile compared to DRIO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check DRIO's competition here
LH vs PRPO Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, PRPO has a market cap of 45.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while PRPO trades at $25.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas PRPO's P/E ratio is -97.08. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PRPO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is less volatile compared to PRPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check PRPO's competition here
LH vs STRR Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, STRR has a market cap of 42.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while STRR trades at $11.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas STRR's P/E ratio is -12.21. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to STRR's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is less volatile compared to STRR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check STRR's competition here
LH vs STRRP Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, STRRP has a market cap of 40.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while STRRP trades at $10.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas STRRP's P/E ratio is -18.61. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to STRRP's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is more volatile compared to STRRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check STRRP's competition here
LH vs AKU Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, AKU has a market cap of 26.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while AKU trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas AKU's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AKU's ROE of -5.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is less volatile compared to AKU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check AKU's competition here
LH vs MDXH Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, MDXH has a market cap of 22.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while MDXH trades at $0.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas MDXH's P/E ratio is -1.17. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MDXH's ROE of +4.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is less volatile compared to MDXH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check MDXH's competition here
LH vs CEMI Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, CEMI has a market cap of 16.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while CEMI trades at $0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas CEMI's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CEMI's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is more volatile compared to CEMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check CEMI's competition here
LH vs ENZ Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, ENZ has a market cap of 16.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while ENZ trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas ENZ's P/E ratio is -2.24. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ENZ's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is less volatile compared to ENZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check ENZ's competition here
LH vs QUCY Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, QUCY has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while QUCY trades at $1.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas QUCY's P/E ratio is -0.06. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to QUCY's ROE of -3.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is less volatile compared to QUCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check QUCY's competition here
LH vs PMD Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, PMD has a market cap of 15.6M. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while PMD trades at $2.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas PMD's P/E ratio is -5.24. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PMD's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is more volatile compared to PMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check PMD's competition here
LH vs ME Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, ME has a market cap of 15.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while ME trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas ME's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ME's ROE of -42.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is more volatile compared to ME. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check ME's competition here
LH vs MYNZ Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, MYNZ has a market cap of 14.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while MYNZ trades at $3.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas MYNZ's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MYNZ's ROE of -10.25%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is less volatile compared to MYNZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check MYNZ's competition here
LH vs BNGO Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, BNGO has a market cap of 13.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while BNGO trades at $1.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas BNGO's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BNGO's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is less volatile compared to BNGO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check BNGO's competition here
LH vs CHEK Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, CHEK has a market cap of 10.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while CHEK trades at $1.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas CHEK's P/E ratio is -0.43. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CHEK's ROE of -2.26%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is less volatile compared to CHEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check CHEK's competition here
LH vs BNR Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, BNR has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while BNR trades at $9.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas BNR's P/E ratio is -11.84. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BNR's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is less volatile compared to BNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check BNR's competition here
LH vs CNTG Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, CNTG has a market cap of 9.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while CNTG trades at $0.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas CNTG's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CNTG's ROE of +3.98%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is more volatile compared to CNTG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check CNTG's competition here
LH vs APDN Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, APDN has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while APDN trades at $5.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas APDN's P/E ratio is -0.10. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to APDN's ROE of -6.53%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is less volatile compared to APDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check APDN's competition here
LH vs MBAI Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, MBAI has a market cap of 5.9M. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while MBAI trades at $1.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas MBAI's P/E ratio is 1.51. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MBAI's ROE of +4.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is less volatile compared to MBAI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check MBAI's competition here
LH vs NVTA Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, NVTA has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while NVTA trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas NVTA's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NVTA's ROE of -2.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is less volatile compared to NVTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check NVTA's competition here
LH vs ADVB Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, ADVB has a market cap of 5.4M. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while ADVB trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas ADVB's P/E ratio is -45.45. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ADVB's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is less volatile compared to ADVB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check ADVB's competition here
LH vs LMDX Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, LMDX has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while LMDX trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas LMDX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LMDX's ROE of -15.58%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is less volatile compared to LMDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check LMDX's competition here
LH vs LMDXW Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, LMDXW has a market cap of 5.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while LMDXW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas LMDXW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to LMDXW's ROE of -15.58%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is less volatile compared to LMDXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check LMDXW's competition here
LH vs NDRA Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, NDRA has a market cap of 4.2M. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while NDRA trades at $5.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas NDRA's P/E ratio is -0.72. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NDRA's ROE of -5.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is less volatile compared to NDRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check NDRA's competition here
LH vs TRIB Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, TRIB has a market cap of 3.7M. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while TRIB trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas TRIB's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to TRIB's ROE of +0.68%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is less volatile compared to TRIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check TRIB's competition here
LH vs DMTK Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, DMTK has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while DMTK trades at $0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas DMTK's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DMTK's ROE of -1.06%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is less volatile compared to DMTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check DMTK's competition here
LH vs BIAF Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, BIAF has a market cap of 3.3M. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while BIAF trades at $0.72.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas BIAF's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BIAF's ROE of -3.59%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is less volatile compared to BIAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check BIAF's competition here
LH vs NOTV Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, NOTV has a market cap of 2.8M. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while NOTV trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas NOTV's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NOTV's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is less volatile compared to NOTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check NOTV's competition here
LH vs SQL Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, SQL has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while SQL trades at $6.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas SQL's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SQL's ROE of +38.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is less volatile compared to SQL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check SQL's competition here
LH vs AWH Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, AWH has a market cap of 2.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while AWH trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas AWH's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AWH's ROE of +2.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is more volatile compared to AWH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check AWH's competition here
LH vs INBS Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, INBS has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while INBS trades at $2.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas INBS's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to INBS's ROE of -1.74%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is less volatile compared to INBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check INBS's competition here
LH vs HTGM Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, HTGM has a market cap of 1.1M. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while HTGM trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas HTGM's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HTGM's ROE of -2.73%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is more volatile compared to HTGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check HTGM's competition here
LH vs BIOC Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, BIOC has a market cap of 450.8K. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while BIOC trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas BIOC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BIOC's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is less volatile compared to BIOC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check BIOC's competition here
LH vs ISPC Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, ISPC has a market cap of 309.7K. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while ISPC trades at $2.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas ISPC's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to ISPC's ROE of -5.85%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is less volatile compared to ISPC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check ISPC's competition here
LH vs SQLLW Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, SQLLW has a market cap of 179.6K. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while SQLLW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas SQLLW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SQLLW's ROE of +38.02%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is less volatile compared to SQLLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check SQLLW's competition here
LH vs NDRAW Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, NDRAW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while NDRAW trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas NDRAW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to NDRAW's ROE of -5.13%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is less volatile compared to NDRAW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check NDRAW's competition here
LH vs MEUSW Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, MEUSW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while MEUSW trades at $1.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas MEUSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MEUSW's ROE of -42.03%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is less volatile compared to MEUSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check MEUSW's competition here
LH vs OCDX Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, OCDX has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while OCDX trades at $17.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas OCDX's P/E ratio is -42.28. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to OCDX's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is less volatile compared to OCDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check OCDX's competition here
LH vs PRXL Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, PRXL has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while PRXL trades at $88.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas PRXL's P/E ratio is 43.49. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PRXL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is more volatile compared to PRXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check PRXL's competition here
LH vs BNGOW Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, BNGOW has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while BNGOW trades at $0.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas BNGOW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BNGOW's ROE of -0.71%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is less volatile compared to BNGOW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check BNGOW's competition here
LH vs CHEKZ Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, CHEKZ has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while CHEKZ trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas CHEKZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CHEKZ's ROE of +4.17%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is less volatile compared to CHEKZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check CHEKZ's competition here
LH vs DHR-PA Comparison July 2026
LH plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, LH stands at 22.3B. In comparison, DHR-PA has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, LH is priced at $271.99, while DHR-PA trades at $1,841.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
LH currently has a P/E ratio of 16.14, whereas DHR-PA's P/E ratio is 233.57. In terms of profitability, LH's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DHR-PA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, LH is less volatile compared to DHR-PA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for LH.Check DHR-PA's competition here