S. M. Gold Limited
S. M. Gold Limited (SMGOLD.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SMGOLD.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Personal Products & Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMGOLD.BO | ₹12.07 | -4.28% | 159.8M | 17.49 | ₹0.69 | N/A |
| TIMEX.BO | ₹374.10 | -2.09% | 37.8B | 71.80 | ₹5.21 | N/A |
| UDAYJEW.BO | ₹156.00 | +1.99% | 3.7B | 28.01 | ₹5.57 | N/A |
| RADIXIND.BO | ₹190.95 | +0.79% | 2.9B | 90.07 | ₹2.12 | +0.26% |
| ITHL.BO | ₹312.00 | -2.45% | 2.5B | 13.50 | ₹23.11 | +1.76% |
| GOLKUNDIA.BO | ₹254.95 | +1.98% | 1.8B | 14.62 | ₹17.44 | +0.59% |
| MINID.BO | ₹15.06 | +0.27% | 1.8B | -7.68 | -₹1.96 | N/A |
| AGOL.BO | ₹4.48 | +1.82% | 1.5B | 8.96 | ₹0.50 | N/A |
| VJTFEDU.BO | ₹82.00 | -2.26% | 1.4B | 8200.00 | ₹0.01 | N/A |
| EY.BO | ₹696.05 | -4.65% | 1.4B | -20.71 | -₹33.61 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SMGOLD.BO vs TIMEX.BO Comparison May 2026
SMGOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMGOLD.BO stands at 159.8M. In comparison, TIMEX.BO has a market cap of 37.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMGOLD.BO is priced at ₹12.07, while TIMEX.BO trades at ₹374.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMGOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.49, whereas TIMEX.BO's P/E ratio is 71.80. In terms of profitability, SMGOLD.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to TIMEX.BO's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, SMGOLD.BO is more volatile compared to TIMEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMGOLD.BO.Check TIMEX.BO's competition here
SMGOLD.BO vs UDAYJEW.BO Comparison May 2026
SMGOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMGOLD.BO stands at 159.8M. In comparison, UDAYJEW.BO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SMGOLD.BO is priced at ₹12.07, while UDAYJEW.BO trades at ₹156.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMGOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.49, whereas UDAYJEW.BO's P/E ratio is 28.01. In terms of profitability, SMGOLD.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to UDAYJEW.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SMGOLD.BO is more volatile compared to UDAYJEW.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMGOLD.BO.Check UDAYJEW.BO's competition here
SMGOLD.BO vs RADIXIND.BO Comparison May 2026
SMGOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMGOLD.BO stands at 159.8M. In comparison, RADIXIND.BO has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SMGOLD.BO is priced at ₹12.07, while RADIXIND.BO trades at ₹190.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMGOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.49, whereas RADIXIND.BO's P/E ratio is 90.07. In terms of profitability, SMGOLD.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to RADIXIND.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SMGOLD.BO is more volatile compared to RADIXIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMGOLD.BO.Check RADIXIND.BO's competition here
SMGOLD.BO vs ITHL.BO Comparison May 2026
SMGOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMGOLD.BO stands at 159.8M. In comparison, ITHL.BO has a market cap of 2.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMGOLD.BO is priced at ₹12.07, while ITHL.BO trades at ₹312.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMGOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.49, whereas ITHL.BO's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, SMGOLD.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to ITHL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SMGOLD.BO is more volatile compared to ITHL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMGOLD.BO.Check ITHL.BO's competition here
SMGOLD.BO vs GOLKUNDIA.BO Comparison May 2026
SMGOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMGOLD.BO stands at 159.8M. In comparison, GOLKUNDIA.BO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMGOLD.BO is priced at ₹12.07, while GOLKUNDIA.BO trades at ₹254.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMGOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.49, whereas GOLKUNDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 14.62. In terms of profitability, SMGOLD.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GOLKUNDIA.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SMGOLD.BO is less volatile compared to GOLKUNDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMGOLD.BO.Check GOLKUNDIA.BO's competition here
SMGOLD.BO vs MINID.BO Comparison May 2026
SMGOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMGOLD.BO stands at 159.8M. In comparison, MINID.BO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SMGOLD.BO is priced at ₹12.07, while MINID.BO trades at ₹15.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMGOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.49, whereas MINID.BO's P/E ratio is -7.68. In terms of profitability, SMGOLD.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MINID.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SMGOLD.BO is more volatile compared to MINID.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMGOLD.BO.Check MINID.BO's competition here
SMGOLD.BO vs AGOL.BO Comparison May 2026
SMGOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMGOLD.BO stands at 159.8M. In comparison, AGOL.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SMGOLD.BO is priced at ₹12.07, while AGOL.BO trades at ₹4.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMGOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.49, whereas AGOL.BO's P/E ratio is 8.96. In terms of profitability, SMGOLD.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to AGOL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SMGOLD.BO is more volatile compared to AGOL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMGOLD.BO.Check AGOL.BO's competition here
SMGOLD.BO vs VJTFEDU.BO Comparison May 2026
SMGOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMGOLD.BO stands at 159.8M. In comparison, VJTFEDU.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMGOLD.BO is priced at ₹12.07, while VJTFEDU.BO trades at ₹82.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMGOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.49, whereas VJTFEDU.BO's P/E ratio is 8200.00. In terms of profitability, SMGOLD.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VJTFEDU.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMGOLD.BO is more volatile compared to VJTFEDU.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMGOLD.BO.Check VJTFEDU.BO's competition here
SMGOLD.BO vs EY.BO Comparison May 2026
SMGOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMGOLD.BO stands at 159.8M. In comparison, EY.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SMGOLD.BO is priced at ₹12.07, while EY.BO trades at ₹696.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMGOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.49, whereas EY.BO's P/E ratio is -20.71. In terms of profitability, SMGOLD.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EY.BO's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SMGOLD.BO is less volatile compared to EY.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMGOLD.BO.Check EY.BO's competition here
SMGOLD.BO vs NARBADA.BO Comparison May 2026
SMGOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMGOLD.BO stands at 159.8M. In comparison, NARBADA.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SMGOLD.BO is priced at ₹12.07, while NARBADA.BO trades at ₹57.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMGOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.49, whereas NARBADA.BO's P/E ratio is 15.37. In terms of profitability, SMGOLD.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to NARBADA.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SMGOLD.BO is more volatile compared to NARBADA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMGOLD.BO.Check NARBADA.BO's competition here
SMGOLD.BO vs PJL.BO Comparison May 2026
SMGOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMGOLD.BO stands at 159.8M. In comparison, PJL.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SMGOLD.BO is priced at ₹12.07, while PJL.BO trades at ₹262.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMGOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.49, whereas PJL.BO's P/E ratio is 9.51. In terms of profitability, SMGOLD.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PJL.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMGOLD.BO is more volatile compared to PJL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMGOLD.BO.Check PJL.BO's competition here
SMGOLD.BO vs VSL.BO Comparison May 2026
SMGOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMGOLD.BO stands at 159.8M. In comparison, VSL.BO has a market cap of 854.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SMGOLD.BO is priced at ₹12.07, while VSL.BO trades at ₹11.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMGOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.49, whereas VSL.BO's P/E ratio is 4.20. In terms of profitability, SMGOLD.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VSL.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SMGOLD.BO is less volatile compared to VSL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMGOLD.BO.Check VSL.BO's competition here
SMGOLD.BO vs SWARNSAR.BO Comparison May 2026
SMGOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMGOLD.BO stands at 159.8M. In comparison, SWARNSAR.BO has a market cap of 696.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SMGOLD.BO is priced at ₹12.07, while SWARNSAR.BO trades at ₹33.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMGOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.49, whereas SWARNSAR.BO's P/E ratio is 6.57. In terms of profitability, SMGOLD.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SWARNSAR.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SMGOLD.BO is more volatile compared to SWARNSAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMGOLD.BO.Check SWARNSAR.BO's competition here
SMGOLD.BO vs DEVLAB.BO Comparison May 2026
SMGOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMGOLD.BO stands at 159.8M. In comparison, DEVLAB.BO has a market cap of 695.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SMGOLD.BO is priced at ₹12.07, while DEVLAB.BO trades at ₹29.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMGOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.49, whereas DEVLAB.BO's P/E ratio is 127.39. In terms of profitability, SMGOLD.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to DEVLAB.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SMGOLD.BO is more volatile compared to DEVLAB.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMGOLD.BO.Check DEVLAB.BO's competition here
SMGOLD.BO vs BOMBCYC.BO Comparison May 2026
SMGOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMGOLD.BO stands at 159.8M. In comparison, BOMBCYC.BO has a market cap of 668.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SMGOLD.BO is priced at ₹12.07, while BOMBCYC.BO trades at ₹1,671.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMGOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.49, whereas BOMBCYC.BO's P/E ratio is -19.91. In terms of profitability, SMGOLD.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BOMBCYC.BO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SMGOLD.BO is less volatile compared to BOMBCYC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMGOLD.BO.Check BOMBCYC.BO's competition here
SMGOLD.BO vs JETKINGQ.BO Comparison May 2026
SMGOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMGOLD.BO stands at 159.8M. In comparison, JETKINGQ.BO has a market cap of 655.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SMGOLD.BO is priced at ₹12.07, while JETKINGQ.BO trades at ₹110.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMGOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.49, whereas JETKINGQ.BO's P/E ratio is 78.65. In terms of profitability, SMGOLD.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to JETKINGQ.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SMGOLD.BO is less volatile compared to JETKINGQ.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMGOLD.BO.Check JETKINGQ.BO's competition here
SMGOLD.BO vs IRONWOOD.BO Comparison May 2026
SMGOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMGOLD.BO stands at 159.8M. In comparison, IRONWOOD.BO has a market cap of 609.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SMGOLD.BO is priced at ₹12.07, while IRONWOOD.BO trades at ₹43.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMGOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.49, whereas IRONWOOD.BO's P/E ratio is -5.64. In terms of profitability, SMGOLD.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to IRONWOOD.BO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SMGOLD.BO is more volatile compared to IRONWOOD.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMGOLD.BO.Check IRONWOOD.BO's competition here
SMGOLD.BO vs BGJL.BO Comparison May 2026
SMGOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMGOLD.BO stands at 159.8M. In comparison, BGJL.BO has a market cap of 579M. Regarding current trading prices, SMGOLD.BO is priced at ₹12.07, while BGJL.BO trades at ₹38.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMGOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.49, whereas BGJL.BO's P/E ratio is 74.04. In terms of profitability, SMGOLD.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to BGJL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SMGOLD.BO is more volatile compared to BGJL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMGOLD.BO.Check BGJL.BO's competition here
SMGOLD.BO vs SJCORP.BO Comparison May 2026
SMGOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMGOLD.BO stands at 159.8M. In comparison, SJCORP.BO has a market cap of 537.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SMGOLD.BO is priced at ₹12.07, while SJCORP.BO trades at ₹65.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMGOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.49, whereas SJCORP.BO's P/E ratio is 112.07. In terms of profitability, SMGOLD.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SJCORP.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SMGOLD.BO is more volatile compared to SJCORP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMGOLD.BO.Check SJCORP.BO's competition here
SMGOLD.BO vs GROWINGTON.BO Comparison May 2026
SMGOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMGOLD.BO stands at 159.8M. In comparison, GROWINGTON.BO has a market cap of 526.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SMGOLD.BO is priced at ₹12.07, while GROWINGTON.BO trades at ₹0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMGOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.49, whereas GROWINGTON.BO's P/E ratio is 9.11. In terms of profitability, SMGOLD.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GROWINGTON.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SMGOLD.BO is less volatile compared to GROWINGTON.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMGOLD.BO.Check GROWINGTON.BO's competition here
SMGOLD.BO vs MINALIND.BO Comparison May 2026
SMGOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMGOLD.BO stands at 159.8M. In comparison, MINALIND.BO has a market cap of 460.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SMGOLD.BO is priced at ₹12.07, while MINALIND.BO trades at ₹2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMGOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.49, whereas MINALIND.BO's P/E ratio is -240.00. In terms of profitability, SMGOLD.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to MINALIND.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SMGOLD.BO is more volatile compared to MINALIND.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMGOLD.BO.Check MINALIND.BO's competition here
SMGOLD.BO vs EIGHTY.BO Comparison May 2026
SMGOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMGOLD.BO stands at 159.8M. In comparison, EIGHTY.BO has a market cap of 357M. Regarding current trading prices, SMGOLD.BO is priced at ₹12.07, while EIGHTY.BO trades at ₹35.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMGOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.49, whereas EIGHTY.BO's P/E ratio is 9.31. In terms of profitability, SMGOLD.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EIGHTY.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SMGOLD.BO is more volatile compared to EIGHTY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMGOLD.BO.Check EIGHTY.BO's competition here
SMGOLD.BO vs EVANS.BO Comparison May 2026
SMGOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMGOLD.BO stands at 159.8M. In comparison, EVANS.BO has a market cap of 337.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SMGOLD.BO is priced at ₹12.07, while EVANS.BO trades at ₹61.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMGOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.49, whereas EVANS.BO's P/E ratio is 2.97. In terms of profitability, SMGOLD.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EVANS.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SMGOLD.BO is less volatile compared to EVANS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMGOLD.BO.Check EVANS.BO's competition here
SMGOLD.BO vs SHOORA.BO Comparison May 2026
SMGOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMGOLD.BO stands at 159.8M. In comparison, SHOORA.BO has a market cap of 283.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SMGOLD.BO is priced at ₹12.07, while SHOORA.BO trades at ₹61.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMGOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.49, whereas SHOORA.BO's P/E ratio is 32.98. In terms of profitability, SMGOLD.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SHOORA.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SMGOLD.BO is more volatile compared to SHOORA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMGOLD.BO.Check SHOORA.BO's competition here
SMGOLD.BO vs YAANENT.BO Comparison May 2026
SMGOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMGOLD.BO stands at 159.8M. In comparison, YAANENT.BO has a market cap of 279.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SMGOLD.BO is priced at ₹12.07, while YAANENT.BO trades at ₹90.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMGOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.49, whereas YAANENT.BO's P/E ratio is 35.83. In terms of profitability, SMGOLD.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to YAANENT.BO's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SMGOLD.BO is less volatile compared to YAANENT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMGOLD.BO.Check YAANENT.BO's competition here
SMGOLD.BO vs KENVI.BO Comparison May 2026
SMGOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMGOLD.BO stands at 159.8M. In comparison, KENVI.BO has a market cap of 269.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SMGOLD.BO is priced at ₹12.07, while KENVI.BO trades at ₹2.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMGOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.49, whereas KENVI.BO's P/E ratio is -6.09. In terms of profitability, SMGOLD.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to KENVI.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SMGOLD.BO is less volatile compared to KENVI.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMGOLD.BO.Check KENVI.BO's competition here
SMGOLD.BO vs OROSMITHS.BO Comparison May 2026
SMGOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMGOLD.BO stands at 159.8M. In comparison, OROSMITHS.BO has a market cap of 247.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SMGOLD.BO is priced at ₹12.07, while OROSMITHS.BO trades at ₹6.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMGOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.49, whereas OROSMITHS.BO's P/E ratio is 24.00. In terms of profitability, SMGOLD.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OROSMITHS.BO's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, SMGOLD.BO is less volatile compared to OROSMITHS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMGOLD.BO.Check OROSMITHS.BO's competition here
SMGOLD.BO vs VIRTUALG.BO Comparison May 2026
SMGOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMGOLD.BO stands at 159.8M. In comparison, VIRTUALG.BO has a market cap of 237.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SMGOLD.BO is priced at ₹12.07, while VIRTUALG.BO trades at ₹0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMGOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.49, whereas VIRTUALG.BO's P/E ratio is -56.00. In terms of profitability, SMGOLD.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to VIRTUALG.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMGOLD.BO is more volatile compared to VIRTUALG.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMGOLD.BO.Check VIRTUALG.BO's competition here
SMGOLD.BO vs SKRABUL.BO Comparison May 2026
SMGOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMGOLD.BO stands at 159.8M. In comparison, SKRABUL.BO has a market cap of 218.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SMGOLD.BO is priced at ₹12.07, while SKRABUL.BO trades at ₹43.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMGOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.49, whereas SKRABUL.BO's P/E ratio is 544.13. In terms of profitability, SMGOLD.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SKRABUL.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SMGOLD.BO is more volatile compared to SKRABUL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMGOLD.BO.Check SKRABUL.BO's competition here
SMGOLD.BO vs SHUBHLAXMI.NS Comparison May 2026
SMGOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMGOLD.BO stands at 159.8M. In comparison, SHUBHLAXMI.NS has a market cap of 175.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SMGOLD.BO is priced at ₹12.07, while SHUBHLAXMI.NS trades at ₹19.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMGOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.49, whereas SHUBHLAXMI.NS's P/E ratio is 12.09. In terms of profitability, SMGOLD.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SHUBHLAXMI.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SMGOLD.BO is more volatile compared to SHUBHLAXMI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMGOLD.BO.Check SHUBHLAXMI.NS's competition here
SMGOLD.BO vs SAGAR.BO Comparison May 2026
SMGOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMGOLD.BO stands at 159.8M. In comparison, SAGAR.BO has a market cap of 164.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SMGOLD.BO is priced at ₹12.07, while SAGAR.BO trades at ₹13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMGOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.49, whereas SAGAR.BO's P/E ratio is -18.31. In terms of profitability, SMGOLD.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SAGAR.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SMGOLD.BO is more volatile compared to SAGAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMGOLD.BO.Check SAGAR.BO's competition here
SMGOLD.BO vs PALMJEWELS.BO Comparison May 2026
SMGOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMGOLD.BO stands at 159.8M. In comparison, PALMJEWELS.BO has a market cap of 157.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SMGOLD.BO is priced at ₹12.07, while PALMJEWELS.BO trades at ₹15.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMGOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.49, whereas PALMJEWELS.BO's P/E ratio is 17.25. In terms of profitability, SMGOLD.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to PALMJEWELS.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SMGOLD.BO is more volatile compared to PALMJEWELS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMGOLD.BO.Check PALMJEWELS.BO's competition here
SMGOLD.BO vs EASTRED.BO Comparison May 2026
SMGOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMGOLD.BO stands at 159.8M. In comparison, EASTRED.BO has a market cap of 148.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SMGOLD.BO is priced at ₹12.07, while EASTRED.BO trades at ₹28.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMGOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.49, whereas EASTRED.BO's P/E ratio is -19.72. In terms of profitability, SMGOLD.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to EASTRED.BO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SMGOLD.BO is more volatile compared to EASTRED.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMGOLD.BO.Check EASTRED.BO's competition here
SMGOLD.BO vs GGL.BO Comparison May 2026
SMGOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMGOLD.BO stands at 159.8M. In comparison, GGL.BO has a market cap of 147.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SMGOLD.BO is priced at ₹12.07, while GGL.BO trades at ₹3.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMGOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.49, whereas GGL.BO's P/E ratio is 53.33. In terms of profitability, SMGOLD.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GGL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SMGOLD.BO is more volatile compared to GGL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMGOLD.BO.Check GGL.BO's competition here
SMGOLD.BO vs SBRANDS.BO Comparison May 2026
SMGOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMGOLD.BO stands at 159.8M. In comparison, SBRANDS.BO has a market cap of 146.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SMGOLD.BO is priced at ₹12.07, while SBRANDS.BO trades at ₹14.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMGOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.49, whereas SBRANDS.BO's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, SMGOLD.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SBRANDS.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SMGOLD.BO is more volatile compared to SBRANDS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMGOLD.BO.Check SBRANDS.BO's competition here
SMGOLD.BO vs SOVERDIA.BO Comparison May 2026
SMGOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMGOLD.BO stands at 159.8M. In comparison, SOVERDIA.BO has a market cap of 128.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SMGOLD.BO is priced at ₹12.07, while SOVERDIA.BO trades at ₹22.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMGOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.49, whereas SOVERDIA.BO's P/E ratio is -2.96. In terms of profitability, SMGOLD.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SOVERDIA.BO's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SMGOLD.BO is less volatile compared to SOVERDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMGOLD.BO.Check SOVERDIA.BO's competition here
SMGOLD.BO vs GOBLIN.BO Comparison May 2026
SMGOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMGOLD.BO stands at 159.8M. In comparison, GOBLIN.BO has a market cap of 111.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SMGOLD.BO is priced at ₹12.07, while GOBLIN.BO trades at ₹8.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMGOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.49, whereas GOBLIN.BO's P/E ratio is 15.28. In terms of profitability, SMGOLD.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to GOBLIN.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SMGOLD.BO is more volatile compared to GOBLIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMGOLD.BO.Check GOBLIN.BO's competition here
SMGOLD.BO vs SUNRAJDI.BO Comparison May 2026
SMGOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMGOLD.BO stands at 159.8M. In comparison, SUNRAJDI.BO has a market cap of 85.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SMGOLD.BO is priced at ₹12.07, while SUNRAJDI.BO trades at ₹16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMGOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.49, whereas SUNRAJDI.BO's P/E ratio is -33.33. In terms of profitability, SMGOLD.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to SUNRAJDI.BO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SMGOLD.BO is more volatile compared to SUNRAJDI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMGOLD.BO.Check SUNRAJDI.BO's competition here
SMGOLD.BO vs OLPCL.BO Comparison May 2026
SMGOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMGOLD.BO stands at 159.8M. In comparison, OLPCL.BO has a market cap of 51.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SMGOLD.BO is priced at ₹12.07, while OLPCL.BO trades at ₹3.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMGOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.49, whereas OLPCL.BO's P/E ratio is 14.32. In terms of profitability, SMGOLD.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to OLPCL.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SMGOLD.BO is less volatile compared to OLPCL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMGOLD.BO.Check OLPCL.BO's competition here
SMGOLD.BO vs HANMAN.BO Comparison May 2026
SMGOLD.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SMGOLD.BO stands at 159.8M. In comparison, HANMAN.BO has a market cap of 42.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SMGOLD.BO is priced at ₹12.07, while HANMAN.BO trades at ₹4.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SMGOLD.BO currently has a P/E ratio of 17.49, whereas HANMAN.BO's P/E ratio is -14.07. In terms of profitability, SMGOLD.BO's ROE is +0.04%, compared to HANMAN.BO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SMGOLD.BO is more volatile compared to HANMAN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SMGOLD.BO.Check HANMAN.BO's competition here