Kenvi Jewels Limited
Kenvi Jewels Limited (KENVI.BO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (KENVI.BO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Personal Products & Services Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KENVI.BO | ₹2.11 | -2.31% | 266.7M | -6.03 | -₹0.35 | N/A |
| TIMEX.BO | ₹382.10 | +4.77% | 38.2B | 73.09 | ₹5.18 | N/A |
| UDAYJEW.BO | ₹152.95 | -0.03% | 3.7B | 28.05 | ₹5.58 | N/A |
| RADIXIND.BO | ₹189.45 | +2.96% | 2.7B | 86.01 | ₹2.13 | +0.27% |
| ITHL.BO | ₹317.65 | -1.98% | 2.6B | 14.00 | ₹23.10 | +1.70% |
| MINID.BO | ₹15.02 | -0.07% | 1.8B | -7.68 | -₹1.96 | N/A |
| GOLKUNDIA.BO | ₹250.00 | -0.32% | 1.7B | 14.23 | ₹17.45 | +0.60% |
| VJTFEDU.BO | ₹82.00 | -2.37% | 1.5B | 8390.00 | ₹0.01 | N/A |
| EY.BO | ₹730.00 | -5.82% | 1.4B | -21.24 | -₹33.60 | N/A |
| AGOL.BO | ₹4.40 | +5.52% | 1.4B | 8.46 | ₹0.50 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
KENVI.BO vs TIMEX.BO Comparison May 2026
KENVI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENVI.BO stands at 266.7M. In comparison, TIMEX.BO has a market cap of 38.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KENVI.BO is priced at ₹2.11, while TIMEX.BO trades at ₹382.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENVI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -6.03, whereas TIMEX.BO's P/E ratio is 73.09. In terms of profitability, KENVI.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TIMEX.BO's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, KENVI.BO is more volatile compared to TIMEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENVI.BO.Check TIMEX.BO's competition here
KENVI.BO vs UDAYJEW.BO Comparison May 2026
KENVI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENVI.BO stands at 266.7M. In comparison, UDAYJEW.BO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KENVI.BO is priced at ₹2.11, while UDAYJEW.BO trades at ₹152.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENVI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -6.03, whereas UDAYJEW.BO's P/E ratio is 28.05. In terms of profitability, KENVI.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UDAYJEW.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KENVI.BO is less volatile compared to UDAYJEW.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENVI.BO.Check UDAYJEW.BO's competition here
KENVI.BO vs RADIXIND.BO Comparison May 2026
KENVI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENVI.BO stands at 266.7M. In comparison, RADIXIND.BO has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KENVI.BO is priced at ₹2.11, while RADIXIND.BO trades at ₹189.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENVI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -6.03, whereas RADIXIND.BO's P/E ratio is 86.01. In terms of profitability, KENVI.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RADIXIND.BO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, KENVI.BO is less volatile compared to RADIXIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENVI.BO.Check RADIXIND.BO's competition here
KENVI.BO vs ITHL.BO Comparison May 2026
KENVI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENVI.BO stands at 266.7M. In comparison, ITHL.BO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, KENVI.BO is priced at ₹2.11, while ITHL.BO trades at ₹317.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENVI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -6.03, whereas ITHL.BO's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, KENVI.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ITHL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KENVI.BO is less volatile compared to ITHL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENVI.BO.Check ITHL.BO's competition here
KENVI.BO vs MINID.BO Comparison May 2026
KENVI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENVI.BO stands at 266.7M. In comparison, MINID.BO has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, KENVI.BO is priced at ₹2.11, while MINID.BO trades at ₹15.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENVI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -6.03, whereas MINID.BO's P/E ratio is -7.68. In terms of profitability, KENVI.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MINID.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, KENVI.BO is more volatile compared to MINID.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENVI.BO.Check MINID.BO's competition here
KENVI.BO vs GOLKUNDIA.BO Comparison May 2026
KENVI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENVI.BO stands at 266.7M. In comparison, GOLKUNDIA.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, KENVI.BO is priced at ₹2.11, while GOLKUNDIA.BO trades at ₹250.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENVI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -6.03, whereas GOLKUNDIA.BO's P/E ratio is 14.23. In terms of profitability, KENVI.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GOLKUNDIA.BO's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, KENVI.BO is more volatile compared to GOLKUNDIA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENVI.BO.Check GOLKUNDIA.BO's competition here
KENVI.BO vs VJTFEDU.BO Comparison May 2026
KENVI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENVI.BO stands at 266.7M. In comparison, VJTFEDU.BO has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, KENVI.BO is priced at ₹2.11, while VJTFEDU.BO trades at ₹82.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENVI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -6.03, whereas VJTFEDU.BO's P/E ratio is 8390.00. In terms of profitability, KENVI.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VJTFEDU.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KENVI.BO is more volatile compared to VJTFEDU.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENVI.BO.Check VJTFEDU.BO's competition here
KENVI.BO vs EY.BO Comparison May 2026
KENVI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENVI.BO stands at 266.7M. In comparison, EY.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KENVI.BO is priced at ₹2.11, while EY.BO trades at ₹730.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENVI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -6.03, whereas EY.BO's P/E ratio is -21.24. In terms of profitability, KENVI.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EY.BO's ROE of -0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, KENVI.BO is more volatile compared to EY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENVI.BO.Check EY.BO's competition here
KENVI.BO vs AGOL.BO Comparison May 2026
KENVI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENVI.BO stands at 266.7M. In comparison, AGOL.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, KENVI.BO is priced at ₹2.11, while AGOL.BO trades at ₹4.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENVI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -6.03, whereas AGOL.BO's P/E ratio is 8.46. In terms of profitability, KENVI.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AGOL.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KENVI.BO is less volatile compared to AGOL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENVI.BO.Check AGOL.BO's competition here
KENVI.BO vs NARBADA.BO Comparison May 2026
KENVI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENVI.BO stands at 266.7M. In comparison, NARBADA.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, KENVI.BO is priced at ₹2.11, while NARBADA.BO trades at ₹57.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENVI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -6.03, whereas NARBADA.BO's P/E ratio is 15.37. In terms of profitability, KENVI.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NARBADA.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KENVI.BO is less volatile compared to NARBADA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENVI.BO.Check NARBADA.BO's competition here
KENVI.BO vs PJL.BO Comparison May 2026
KENVI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENVI.BO stands at 266.7M. In comparison, PJL.BO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, KENVI.BO is priced at ₹2.11, while PJL.BO trades at ₹262.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENVI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -6.03, whereas PJL.BO's P/E ratio is 9.51. In terms of profitability, KENVI.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PJL.BO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KENVI.BO is more volatile compared to PJL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENVI.BO.Check PJL.BO's competition here
KENVI.BO vs VSL.BO Comparison May 2026
KENVI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENVI.BO stands at 266.7M. In comparison, VSL.BO has a market cap of 879.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KENVI.BO is priced at ₹2.11, while VSL.BO trades at ₹11.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENVI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -6.03, whereas VSL.BO's P/E ratio is 4.32. In terms of profitability, KENVI.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VSL.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KENVI.BO is less volatile compared to VSL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENVI.BO.Check VSL.BO's competition here
KENVI.BO vs DEVLAB.BO Comparison May 2026
KENVI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENVI.BO stands at 266.7M. In comparison, DEVLAB.BO has a market cap of 722.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KENVI.BO is priced at ₹2.11, while DEVLAB.BO trades at ₹29.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENVI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -6.03, whereas DEVLAB.BO's P/E ratio is 132.39. In terms of profitability, KENVI.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DEVLAB.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KENVI.BO is more volatile compared to DEVLAB.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENVI.BO.Check DEVLAB.BO's competition here
KENVI.BO vs SWARNSAR.BO Comparison May 2026
KENVI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENVI.BO stands at 266.7M. In comparison, SWARNSAR.BO has a market cap of 670.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KENVI.BO is priced at ₹2.11, while SWARNSAR.BO trades at ₹32.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENVI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -6.03, whereas SWARNSAR.BO's P/E ratio is 6.32. In terms of profitability, KENVI.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SWARNSAR.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, KENVI.BO is less volatile compared to SWARNSAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENVI.BO.Check SWARNSAR.BO's competition here
KENVI.BO vs BOMBCYC.BO Comparison May 2026
KENVI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENVI.BO stands at 266.7M. In comparison, BOMBCYC.BO has a market cap of 644.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KENVI.BO is priced at ₹2.11, while BOMBCYC.BO trades at ₹1,652.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENVI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -6.03, whereas BOMBCYC.BO's P/E ratio is -19.48. In terms of profitability, KENVI.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BOMBCYC.BO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, KENVI.BO is less volatile compared to BOMBCYC.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENVI.BO.Check BOMBCYC.BO's competition here
KENVI.BO vs IRONWOOD.BO Comparison May 2026
KENVI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENVI.BO stands at 266.7M. In comparison, IRONWOOD.BO has a market cap of 598.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KENVI.BO is priced at ₹2.11, while IRONWOOD.BO trades at ₹42.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENVI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -6.03, whereas IRONWOOD.BO's P/E ratio is -5.54. In terms of profitability, KENVI.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IRONWOOD.BO's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, KENVI.BO is less volatile compared to IRONWOOD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENVI.BO.Check IRONWOOD.BO's competition here
KENVI.BO vs JETKINGQ.BO Comparison May 2026
KENVI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENVI.BO stands at 266.7M. In comparison, JETKINGQ.BO has a market cap of 596.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KENVI.BO is priced at ₹2.11, while JETKINGQ.BO trades at ₹105.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENVI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -6.03, whereas JETKINGQ.BO's P/E ratio is 71.56. In terms of profitability, KENVI.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JETKINGQ.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KENVI.BO is more volatile compared to JETKINGQ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENVI.BO.Check JETKINGQ.BO's competition here
KENVI.BO vs BGJL.BO Comparison May 2026
KENVI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENVI.BO stands at 266.7M. In comparison, BGJL.BO has a market cap of 595.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KENVI.BO is priced at ₹2.11, while BGJL.BO trades at ₹40.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENVI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -6.03, whereas BGJL.BO's P/E ratio is 76.19. In terms of profitability, KENVI.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BGJL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, KENVI.BO is less volatile compared to BGJL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENVI.BO.Check BGJL.BO's competition here
KENVI.BO vs GROWINGTON.BO Comparison May 2026
KENVI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENVI.BO stands at 266.7M. In comparison, GROWINGTON.BO has a market cap of 539.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KENVI.BO is priced at ₹2.11, while GROWINGTON.BO trades at ₹0.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENVI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -6.03, whereas GROWINGTON.BO's P/E ratio is 9.33. In terms of profitability, KENVI.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GROWINGTON.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, KENVI.BO is more volatile compared to GROWINGTON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENVI.BO.Check GROWINGTON.BO's competition here
KENVI.BO vs SJCORP.BO Comparison May 2026
KENVI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENVI.BO stands at 266.7M. In comparison, SJCORP.BO has a market cap of 537.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KENVI.BO is priced at ₹2.11, while SJCORP.BO trades at ₹65.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENVI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -6.03, whereas SJCORP.BO's P/E ratio is 112.07. In terms of profitability, KENVI.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SJCORP.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KENVI.BO is more volatile compared to SJCORP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENVI.BO.Check SJCORP.BO's competition here
KENVI.BO vs MINALIND.BO Comparison May 2026
KENVI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENVI.BO stands at 266.7M. In comparison, MINALIND.BO has a market cap of 449M. Regarding current trading prices, KENVI.BO is priced at ₹2.11, while MINALIND.BO trades at ₹2.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENVI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -6.03, whereas MINALIND.BO's P/E ratio is -234.00. In terms of profitability, KENVI.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MINALIND.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KENVI.BO is less volatile compared to MINALIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENVI.BO.Check MINALIND.BO's competition here
KENVI.BO vs EVANS.BO Comparison May 2026
KENVI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENVI.BO stands at 266.7M. In comparison, EVANS.BO has a market cap of 362.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KENVI.BO is priced at ₹2.11, while EVANS.BO trades at ₹67.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENVI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -6.03, whereas EVANS.BO's P/E ratio is 3.19. In terms of profitability, KENVI.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EVANS.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, KENVI.BO is more volatile compared to EVANS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENVI.BO.Check EVANS.BO's competition here
KENVI.BO vs EIGHTY.BO Comparison May 2026
KENVI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENVI.BO stands at 266.7M. In comparison, EIGHTY.BO has a market cap of 327.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KENVI.BO is priced at ₹2.11, while EIGHTY.BO trades at ₹35.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENVI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -6.03, whereas EIGHTY.BO's P/E ratio is 8.54. In terms of profitability, KENVI.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EIGHTY.BO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, KENVI.BO is more volatile compared to EIGHTY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENVI.BO.Check EIGHTY.BO's competition here
KENVI.BO vs YAANENT.BO Comparison May 2026
KENVI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENVI.BO stands at 266.7M. In comparison, YAANENT.BO has a market cap of 287.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KENVI.BO is priced at ₹2.11, while YAANENT.BO trades at ₹92.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENVI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -6.03, whereas YAANENT.BO's P/E ratio is 46.14. In terms of profitability, KENVI.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to YAANENT.BO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, KENVI.BO is less volatile compared to YAANENT.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENVI.BO.Check YAANENT.BO's competition here
KENVI.BO vs SHOORA.BO Comparison May 2026
KENVI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENVI.BO stands at 266.7M. In comparison, SHOORA.BO has a market cap of 272.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KENVI.BO is priced at ₹2.11, while SHOORA.BO trades at ₹60.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENVI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -6.03, whereas SHOORA.BO's P/E ratio is 31.71. In terms of profitability, KENVI.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SHOORA.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KENVI.BO is more volatile compared to SHOORA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENVI.BO.Check SHOORA.BO's competition here
KENVI.BO vs OROSMITHS.BO Comparison May 2026
KENVI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENVI.BO stands at 266.7M. In comparison, OROSMITHS.BO has a market cap of 261.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KENVI.BO is priced at ₹2.11, while OROSMITHS.BO trades at ₹5.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENVI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -6.03, whereas OROSMITHS.BO's P/E ratio is 25.36. In terms of profitability, KENVI.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OROSMITHS.BO's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, KENVI.BO is less volatile compared to OROSMITHS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENVI.BO.Check OROSMITHS.BO's competition here
KENVI.BO vs VIRTUALG.BO Comparison May 2026
KENVI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENVI.BO stands at 266.7M. In comparison, VIRTUALG.BO has a market cap of 245.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KENVI.BO is priced at ₹2.11, while VIRTUALG.BO trades at ₹0.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENVI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -6.03, whereas VIRTUALG.BO's P/E ratio is -58.00. In terms of profitability, KENVI.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VIRTUALG.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KENVI.BO is less volatile compared to VIRTUALG.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENVI.BO.Check VIRTUALG.BO's competition here
KENVI.BO vs SKRABUL.BO Comparison May 2026
KENVI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENVI.BO stands at 266.7M. In comparison, SKRABUL.BO has a market cap of 215.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KENVI.BO is priced at ₹2.11, while SKRABUL.BO trades at ₹43.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENVI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -6.03, whereas SKRABUL.BO's P/E ratio is 536.25. In terms of profitability, KENVI.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SKRABUL.BO's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, KENVI.BO is more volatile compared to SKRABUL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENVI.BO.Check SKRABUL.BO's competition here
KENVI.BO vs SHUBHLAXMI.NS Comparison May 2026
KENVI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENVI.BO stands at 266.7M. In comparison, SHUBHLAXMI.NS has a market cap of 177M. Regarding current trading prices, KENVI.BO is priced at ₹2.11, while SHUBHLAXMI.NS trades at ₹20.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENVI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -6.03, whereas SHUBHLAXMI.NS's P/E ratio is 12.18. In terms of profitability, KENVI.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SHUBHLAXMI.NS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, KENVI.BO is more volatile compared to SHUBHLAXMI.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENVI.BO.Check SHUBHLAXMI.NS's competition here
KENVI.BO vs SMGOLD.BO Comparison May 2026
KENVI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENVI.BO stands at 266.7M. In comparison, SMGOLD.BO has a market cap of 166.1M. Regarding current trading prices, KENVI.BO is priced at ₹2.11, while SMGOLD.BO trades at ₹12.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENVI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -6.03, whereas SMGOLD.BO's P/E ratio is 18.19. In terms of profitability, KENVI.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SMGOLD.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, KENVI.BO is less volatile compared to SMGOLD.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENVI.BO.Check SMGOLD.BO's competition here
KENVI.BO vs SAGAR.BO Comparison May 2026
KENVI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENVI.BO stands at 266.7M. In comparison, SAGAR.BO has a market cap of 164.4M. Regarding current trading prices, KENVI.BO is priced at ₹2.11, while SAGAR.BO trades at ₹13.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENVI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -6.03, whereas SAGAR.BO's P/E ratio is -18.31. In terms of profitability, KENVI.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SAGAR.BO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, KENVI.BO is more volatile compared to SAGAR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENVI.BO.Check SAGAR.BO's competition here
KENVI.BO vs PALMJEWELS.BO Comparison May 2026
KENVI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENVI.BO stands at 266.7M. In comparison, PALMJEWELS.BO has a market cap of 155.6M. Regarding current trading prices, KENVI.BO is priced at ₹2.11, while PALMJEWELS.BO trades at ₹15.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENVI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -6.03, whereas PALMJEWELS.BO's P/E ratio is 17.03. In terms of profitability, KENVI.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PALMJEWELS.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KENVI.BO is less volatile compared to PALMJEWELS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENVI.BO.Check PALMJEWELS.BO's competition here
KENVI.BO vs GGL.BO Comparison May 2026
KENVI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENVI.BO stands at 266.7M. In comparison, GGL.BO has a market cap of 145.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KENVI.BO is priced at ₹2.11, while GGL.BO trades at ₹3.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENVI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -6.03, whereas GGL.BO's P/E ratio is 52.50. In terms of profitability, KENVI.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GGL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, KENVI.BO is less volatile compared to GGL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENVI.BO.Check GGL.BO's competition here
KENVI.BO vs EASTRED.BO Comparison May 2026
KENVI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENVI.BO stands at 266.7M. In comparison, EASTRED.BO has a market cap of 144.5M. Regarding current trading prices, KENVI.BO is priced at ₹2.11, while EASTRED.BO trades at ₹28.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENVI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -6.03, whereas EASTRED.BO's P/E ratio is -19.04. In terms of profitability, KENVI.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EASTRED.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, KENVI.BO is more volatile compared to EASTRED.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENVI.BO.Check EASTRED.BO's competition here
KENVI.BO vs SBRANDS.BO Comparison May 2026
KENVI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENVI.BO stands at 266.7M. In comparison, SBRANDS.BO has a market cap of 139.7M. Regarding current trading prices, KENVI.BO is priced at ₹2.11, while SBRANDS.BO trades at ₹14.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENVI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -6.03, whereas SBRANDS.BO's P/E ratio is 10.40. In terms of profitability, KENVI.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SBRANDS.BO's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, KENVI.BO is more volatile compared to SBRANDS.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENVI.BO.Check SBRANDS.BO's competition here
KENVI.BO vs SOVERDIA.BO Comparison May 2026
KENVI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENVI.BO stands at 266.7M. In comparison, SOVERDIA.BO has a market cap of 129.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KENVI.BO is priced at ₹2.11, while SOVERDIA.BO trades at ₹22.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENVI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -6.03, whereas SOVERDIA.BO's P/E ratio is -2.99. In terms of profitability, KENVI.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SOVERDIA.BO's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, KENVI.BO is less volatile compared to SOVERDIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENVI.BO.Check SOVERDIA.BO's competition here
KENVI.BO vs GOBLIN.BO Comparison May 2026
KENVI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENVI.BO stands at 266.7M. In comparison, GOBLIN.BO has a market cap of 111.9M. Regarding current trading prices, KENVI.BO is priced at ₹2.11, while GOBLIN.BO trades at ₹8.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENVI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -6.03, whereas GOBLIN.BO's P/E ratio is 15.28. In terms of profitability, KENVI.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GOBLIN.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, KENVI.BO is more volatile compared to GOBLIN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENVI.BO.Check GOBLIN.BO's competition here
KENVI.BO vs SUNRAJDI.BO Comparison May 2026
KENVI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENVI.BO stands at 266.7M. In comparison, SUNRAJDI.BO has a market cap of 85.3M. Regarding current trading prices, KENVI.BO is priced at ₹2.11, while SUNRAJDI.BO trades at ₹16.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENVI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -6.03, whereas SUNRAJDI.BO's P/E ratio is -33.33. In terms of profitability, KENVI.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SUNRAJDI.BO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, KENVI.BO is more volatile compared to SUNRAJDI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENVI.BO.Check SUNRAJDI.BO's competition here
KENVI.BO vs OLPCL.BO Comparison May 2026
KENVI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENVI.BO stands at 266.7M. In comparison, OLPCL.BO has a market cap of 50.2M. Regarding current trading prices, KENVI.BO is priced at ₹2.11, while OLPCL.BO trades at ₹2.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENVI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -6.03, whereas OLPCL.BO's P/E ratio is 14.00. In terms of profitability, KENVI.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OLPCL.BO's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, KENVI.BO is less volatile compared to OLPCL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENVI.BO.Check OLPCL.BO's competition here
KENVI.BO vs HANMAN.BO Comparison May 2026
KENVI.BO plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, KENVI.BO stands at 266.7M. In comparison, HANMAN.BO has a market cap of 42.8M. Regarding current trading prices, KENVI.BO is priced at ₹2.11, while HANMAN.BO trades at ₹4.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
KENVI.BO currently has a P/E ratio of -6.03, whereas HANMAN.BO's P/E ratio is -14.07. In terms of profitability, KENVI.BO's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HANMAN.BO's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, KENVI.BO is more volatile compared to HANMAN.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for KENVI.BO.Check HANMAN.BO's competition here