Sky Harbour Group Corporation
Sky Harbour Group Corporation (SKYH-WT) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SKYH-WT) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Aerospace & Defense Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SKYH-WT | $0.69 | +21.05% | 20.3M | -2.05 | -$0.34 | N/A |
| GE | $334.74 | +0.00% | 362B | 42.74 | $8.03 | +0.42% |
| RTX | $205.41 | +0.33% | 275.2B | 41.41 | $4.95 | +1.32% |
| BA | $233.71 | +0.00% | 182.2B | 93.19 | $2.49 | N/A |
| LMT | $666.51 | +0.00% | 152.4B | 30.63 | $21.50 | +2.03% |
| NOC | $736.87 | +0.00% | 102.7B | 24.86 | $29.11 | +1.25% |
| GD | $354.34 | +0.00% | 95B | 22.75 | $15.45 | +1.71% |
| TDG | $1,330.13 | +0.00% | 75.6B | 43.04 | $31.12 | +6.74% |
| LHX | $358.70 | +0.00% | 66.6B | 41.76 | $8.53 | +1.35% |
| HEI | $345.99 | +0.00% | 48.9B | 71.63 | $4.91 | +0.07% |
Stock Comparison
SKYH-WT vs GE Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, GE has a market cap of 362B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while GE trades at $334.74.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas GE's P/E ratio is 42.74. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GE's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to GE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check GE's competition here
SKYH-WT vs RTX Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, RTX has a market cap of 275.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while RTX trades at $205.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas RTX's P/E ratio is 41.41. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to RTX's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to RTX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check RTX's competition here
SKYH-WT vs BA Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, BA has a market cap of 182.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while BA trades at $233.71.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas BA's P/E ratio is 93.19. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BA's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to BA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check BA's competition here
SKYH-WT vs LMT Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, LMT has a market cap of 152.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while LMT trades at $666.51.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas LMT's P/E ratio is 30.63. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LMT's ROE of +0.81%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to LMT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check LMT's competition here
SKYH-WT vs NOC Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, NOC has a market cap of 102.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while NOC trades at $736.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas NOC's P/E ratio is 24.86. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NOC's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to NOC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check NOC's competition here
SKYH-WT vs GD Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, GD has a market cap of 95B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while GD trades at $354.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas GD's P/E ratio is 22.75. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GD's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to GD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check GD's competition here
SKYH-WT vs TDG Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, TDG has a market cap of 75.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while TDG trades at $1,330.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas TDG's P/E ratio is 43.04. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TDG's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to TDG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check TDG's competition here
SKYH-WT vs LHX Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, LHX has a market cap of 66.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while LHX trades at $358.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas LHX's P/E ratio is 41.76. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LHX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to LHX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check LHX's competition here
SKYH-WT vs HEI Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, HEI has a market cap of 48.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while HEI trades at $345.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas HEI's P/E ratio is 71.63. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to HEI's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to HEI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check HEI's competition here
SKYH-WT vs ERJ Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, ERJ has a market cap of 47.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while ERJ trades at $64.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas ERJ's P/E ratio is 37.73. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ERJ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to ERJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check ERJ's competition here
SKYH-WT vs HEI-A Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, HEI-A has a market cap of 40.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while HEI-A trades at $260.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas HEI-A's P/E ratio is 53.30. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to HEI-A's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to HEI-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check HEI-A's competition here
SKYH-WT vs RKLB Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, RKLB has a market cap of 37.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while RKLB trades at $76.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas RKLB's P/E ratio is -186.47. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to RKLB's ROE of -0.28%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to RKLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check RKLB's competition here
SKYH-WT vs AXON Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, AXON has a market cap of 34.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while AXON trades at $441.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas AXON's P/E ratio is 138.19. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AXON's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to AXON. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check AXON's competition here
SKYH-WT vs ESLT Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, ESLT has a market cap of 33.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while ESLT trades at $730.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas ESLT's P/E ratio is 73.50. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ESLT's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to ESLT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check ESLT's competition here
SKYH-WT vs CW Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, CW has a market cap of 26.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while CW trades at $702.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas CW's P/E ratio is 54.91. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CW's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to CW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check CW's competition here
SKYH-WT vs WWD Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, WWD has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while WWD trades at $390.92.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas WWD's P/E ratio is 49.69. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to WWD's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to WWD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check WWD's competition here
SKYH-WT vs BWXT Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, BWXT has a market cap of 18.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while BWXT trades at $209.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas BWXT's P/E ratio is 61.80. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BWXT's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to BWXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check BWXT's competition here
SKYH-WT vs TXT Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, TXT has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while TXT trades at $99.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas TXT's P/E ratio is 19.68. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TXT's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to TXT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check TXT's competition here
SKYH-WT vs HII Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, HII has a market cap of 17.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while HII trades at $443.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas HII's P/E ratio is 28.46. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to HII's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to HII. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check HII's competition here
SKYH-WT vs KTOS Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, KTOS has a market cap of 16.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while KTOS trades at $105.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas KTOS's P/E ratio is 739.08. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to KTOS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to KTOS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check KTOS's competition here
SKYH-WT vs EMBJ Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, EMBJ has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while EMBJ trades at $72.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas EMBJ's P/E ratio is 43.43. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EMBJ's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to EMBJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check EMBJ's competition here
SKYH-WT vs AVAV Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, AVAV has a market cap of 13.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while AVAV trades at $281.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas AVAV's P/E ratio is -216.91. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AVAV's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to AVAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check AVAV's competition here
SKYH-WT vs MOG-A Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, MOG-A has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while MOG-A trades at $338.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas MOG-A's P/E ratio is 43.08. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MOG-A's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to MOG-A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check MOG-A's competition here
SKYH-WT vs MOG-B Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, MOG-B has a market cap of 10.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while MOG-B trades at $326.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas MOG-B's P/E ratio is 43.05. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MOG-B's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to MOG-B. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check MOG-B's competition here
SKYH-WT vs KRMN Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, KRMN has a market cap of 10.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while KRMN trades at $88.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas KRMN's P/E ratio is 1019.88. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to KRMN's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to KRMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check KRMN's competition here
SKYH-WT vs SARO Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, SARO has a market cap of 10.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while SARO trades at $31.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas SARO's P/E ratio is 57.07. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SARO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to SARO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check SARO's competition here
SKYH-WT vs DRS Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, DRS has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while DRS trades at $41.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas DRS's P/E ratio is 40.43. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DRS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to DRS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check DRS's competition here
SKYH-WT vs CAE Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, CAE has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while CAE trades at $29.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas CAE's P/E ratio is 34.47. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CAE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to CAE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check CAE's competition here
SKYH-WT vs AMTM Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, AMTM has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while AMTM trades at $32.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas AMTM's P/E ratio is 77.45. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AMTM's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to AMTM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check AMTM's competition here
SKYH-WT vs PL Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, PL has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while PL trades at $25.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas PL's P/E ratio is -55.59. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PL's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check PL's competition here
SKYH-WT vs HXL Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, HXL has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while HXL trades at $87.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas HXL's P/E ratio is 65.67. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to HXL's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to HXL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check HXL's competition here
SKYH-WT vs LOAR Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, LOAR has a market cap of 6.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while LOAR trades at $67.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas LOAR's P/E ratio is 101.61. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LOAR's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to LOAR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check LOAR's competition here
SKYH-WT vs VSEC Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, VSEC has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while VSEC trades at $224.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas VSEC's P/E ratio is 75.67. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to VSEC's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to VSEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check VSEC's competition here
SKYH-WT vs MRCY Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, MRCY has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while MRCY trades at $89.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas MRCY's P/E ratio is -168.52. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MRCY's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to MRCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check MRCY's competition here
SKYH-WT vs ACHR Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, ACHR has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while ACHR trades at $7.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas ACHR's P/E ratio is -5.92. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ACHR's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to ACHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check ACHR's competition here
SKYH-WT vs RAL Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, RAL has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while RAL trades at $43.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas RAL's P/E ratio is -4.03. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to RAL's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to RAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check RAL's competition here
SKYH-WT vs AJRD Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, AJRD has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while AJRD trades at $57.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas AJRD's P/E ratio is 63.03. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AJRD's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to AJRD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check AJRD's competition here
SKYH-WT vs SPR Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, SPR has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while SPR trades at $39.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas SPR's P/E ratio is -1.78. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SPR's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to SPR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check SPR's competition here
SKYH-WT vs AIR Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, AIR has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while AIR trades at $115.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas AIR's P/E ratio is 45.69. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AIR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to AIR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check AIR's competition here
SKYH-WT vs BETA Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, BETA has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while BETA trades at $19.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas BETA's P/E ratio is -4.78. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BETA's ROE of -1.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to BETA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check BETA's competition here
SKYH-WT vs PL-WT Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, PL-WT has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while PL-WT trades at $13.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas PL-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PL-WT's ROE of -0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to PL-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check PL-WT's competition here
SKYH-WT vs FLY Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, FLY has a market cap of 3.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while FLY trades at $21.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas FLY's P/E ratio is -7.48. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FLY's ROE of +0.96%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to FLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check FLY's competition here
SKYH-WT vs LUNR Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, LUNR has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while LUNR trades at $18.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas LUNR's P/E ratio is -7.13. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LUNR's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to LUNR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check LUNR's competition here
SKYH-WT vs POWWP Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, POWWP has a market cap of 2.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while POWWP trades at $24.39.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas POWWP's P/E ratio is 84.61. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to POWWP's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to POWWP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check POWWP's competition here
SKYH-WT vs ATRO Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, ATRO has a market cap of 2.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while ATRO trades at $78.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas ATRO's P/E ratio is -869.44. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ATRO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to ATRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check ATRO's competition here
SKYH-WT vs VVX Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, VVX has a market cap of 2.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while VVX trades at $70.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas VVX's P/E ratio is 26.68. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to VVX's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to VVX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check VVX's competition here
SKYH-WT vs TGI Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, TGI has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while TGI trades at $26.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas TGI's P/E ratio is 56.54. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TGI's ROE of -0.65%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to TGI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check TGI's competition here
SKYH-WT vs DCO Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, DCO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while DCO trades at $126.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas DCO's P/E ratio is -54.54. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DCO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to DCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check DCO's competition here
SKYH-WT vs CDRE Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, CDRE has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while CDRE trades at $43.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas CDRE's P/E ratio is 39.87. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CDRE's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to CDRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check CDRE's competition here
SKYH-WT vs ACHR-WT Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, ACHR-WT has a market cap of 1.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while ACHR-WT trades at -$9.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas ACHR-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ACHR-WT's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to ACHR-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check ACHR-WT's competition here
SKYH-WT vs VOYG Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, VOYG has a market cap of 1.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while VOYG trades at $28.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas VOYG's P/E ratio is -15.33. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to VOYG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to VOYG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check VOYG's competition here
SKYH-WT vs RDW Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, RDW has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while RDW trades at $8.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas RDW's P/E ratio is -2.57. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to RDW's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to RDW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check RDW's competition here
SKYH-WT vs KAMN Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, KAMN has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while KAMN trades at $45.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas KAMN's P/E ratio is 164.25. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to KAMN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to KAMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check KAMN's competition here
SKYH-WT vs EVEX-WT Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, EVEX-WT has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while EVEX-WT trades at $0.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas EVEX-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EVEX-WT's ROE of -2.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to EVEX-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check EVEX-WT's competition here
SKYH-WT vs VEC Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, VEC has a market cap of 1B. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while VEC trades at $32.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas VEC's P/E ratio is 11.09. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to VEC's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to VEC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check VEC's competition here
SKYH-WT vs EVEX Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, EVEX has a market cap of 934.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while EVEX trades at $3.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas EVEX's P/E ratio is -4.70. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EVEX's ROE of -2.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to EVEX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check EVEX's competition here
SKYH-WT vs NPK Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, NPK has a market cap of 907.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while NPK trades at $127.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas NPK's P/E ratio is 23.12. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to NPK's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to NPK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check NPK's competition here
SKYH-WT vs SKYH Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, SKYH has a market cap of 689.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while SKYH trades at $8.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas SKYH's P/E ratio is -19.67. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SKYH's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to SKYH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check SKYH's competition here
SKYH-WT vs TATT Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, TATT has a market cap of 684.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while TATT trades at $53.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas TATT's P/E ratio is 39.74. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to TATT's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to TATT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check TATT's competition here
SKYH-WT vs RGR Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, RGR has a market cap of 612.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while RGR trades at $38.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas RGR's P/E ratio is 274.50. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to RGR's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to RGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check RGR's competition here
SKYH-WT vs SWBI Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, SWBI has a market cap of 534.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while SWBI trades at $12.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas SWBI's P/E ratio is 57.19. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SWBI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to SWBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check SWBI's competition here
SKYH-WT vs PKE Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, PKE has a market cap of 515.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while PKE trades at $25.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas PKE's P/E ratio is 60.17. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PKE's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to PKE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check PKE's competition here
SKYH-WT vs EH Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, EH has a market cap of 441.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while EH trades at $12.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas EH's P/E ratio is -21.40. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EH's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to EH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check EH's competition here
SKYH-WT vs EVTL Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, EVTL has a market cap of 439.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while EVTL trades at $4.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas EVTL's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to EVTL's ROE of +17.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to EVTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check EVTL's competition here
SKYH-WT vs ISSC Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, ISSC has a market cap of 432.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while ISSC trades at $24.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas ISSC's P/E ratio is 22.94. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ISSC's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to ISSC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check ISSC's competition here
SKYH-WT vs AIRO Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, AIRO has a market cap of 291.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while AIRO trades at $10.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas AIRO's P/E ratio is -62.07. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AIRO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to AIRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check AIRO's competition here
SKYH-WT vs BYRN Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, BYRN has a market cap of 283.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while BYRN trades at $12.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas BYRN's P/E ratio is 31.23. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to BYRN's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to BYRN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check BYRN's competition here
SKYH-WT vs POWW Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, POWW has a market cap of 244M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while POWW trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas POWW's P/E ratio is -7.43. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to POWW's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to POWW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check POWW's competition here
SKYH-WT vs DPRO Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, DPRO has a market cap of 201.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while DPRO trades at $7.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas DPRO's P/E ratio is -4.70. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to DPRO's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to DPRO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check DPRO's competition here
SKYH-WT vs SPCE Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, SPCE has a market cap of 156.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while SPCE trades at $2.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas SPCE's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SPCE's ROE of -1.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to SPCE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check SPCE's competition here
SKYH-WT vs CODA Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, CODA has a market cap of 151.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while CODA trades at $13.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas CODA's P/E ratio is 36.36. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CODA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to CODA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check CODA's competition here
SKYH-WT vs VWAV Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, VWAV has a market cap of 138.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while VWAV trades at $7.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas VWAV's P/E ratio is -17.63. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to VWAV's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to VWAV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check VWAV's competition here
SKYH-WT vs IVAC Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, IVAC has a market cap of 108.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while IVAC trades at $4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas IVAC's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to IVAC's ROE of -0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to IVAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check IVAC's competition here
SKYH-WT vs FJET Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, FJET has a market cap of 100.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while FJET trades at $10.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas FJET's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to FJET's ROE of +2.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to FJET. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check FJET's competition here
SKYH-WT vs PEW Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, PEW has a market cap of 85.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while PEW trades at $2.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas PEW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PEW's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to PEW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check PEW's competition here
SKYH-WT vs HOVR Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, HOVR has a market cap of 83.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while HOVR trades at $1.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas HOVR's P/E ratio is -2.38. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to HOVR's ROE of -3.57%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to HOVR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check HOVR's competition here
SKYH-WT vs OPXS Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, OPXS has a market cap of 82.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while OPXS trades at $12.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas OPXS's P/E ratio is 18.22. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to OPXS's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to OPXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check OPXS's competition here
SKYH-WT vs SIF Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, SIF has a market cap of 79.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while SIF trades at $12.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas SIF's P/E ratio is 23.63. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SIF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to SIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check SIF's competition here
SKYH-WT vs SIDU Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, SIDU has a market cap of 73M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while SIDU trades at $2.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas SIDU's P/E ratio is -1.64. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SIDU's ROE of -1.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to SIDU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check SIDU's competition here
SKYH-WT vs SPAI Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, SPAI has a market cap of 57.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while SPAI trades at $4.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas SPAI's P/E ratio is -5.01. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to SPAI's ROE of -2.80%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to SPAI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check SPAI's competition here
SKYH-WT vs CVU Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, CVU has a market cap of 52.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while CVU trades at $4.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas CVU's P/E ratio is -80.00. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to CVU's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to CVU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check CVU's competition here
SKYH-WT vs LLAP Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, LLAP has a market cap of 51.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while LLAP trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas LLAP's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LLAP's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to LLAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check LLAP's competition here
SKYH-WT vs LLAP-WT Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, LLAP-WT has a market cap of 50M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while LLAP-WT trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas LLAP-WT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LLAP-WT's ROE of +1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to LLAP-WT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check LLAP-WT's competition here
SKYH-WT vs VTSI Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, VTSI has a market cap of 47.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while VTSI trades at $4.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas VTSI's P/E ratio is 42.20. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to VTSI's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to VTSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check VTSI's competition here
SKYH-WT vs LILM Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, LILM has a market cap of 37.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while LILM trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas LILM's P/E ratio is 0.74. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LILM's ROE of -3.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to LILM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check LILM's competition here
SKYH-WT vs KITTW Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, KITTW has a market cap of 36.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while KITTW trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas KITTW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to KITTW's ROE of +19.56%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to KITTW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check KITTW's competition here
SKYH-WT vs XTIA Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, XTIA has a market cap of 28.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while XTIA trades at $1.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas XTIA's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to XTIA's ROE of -5.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to XTIA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check XTIA's competition here
SKYH-WT vs PRZO Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, PRZO has a market cap of 24.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while PRZO trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas PRZO's P/E ratio is -1.24. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to PRZO's ROE of -5.75%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to PRZO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check PRZO's competition here
SKYH-WT vs GPUS Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, GPUS has a market cap of 20M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while GPUS trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas GPUS's P/E ratio is 0.11. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to GPUS's ROE of -1.92%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to GPUS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check GPUS's competition here
SKYH-WT vs HOVRW Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, HOVRW has a market cap of 16.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while HOVRW trades at $0.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas HOVRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to HOVRW's ROE of -3.57%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to HOVRW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check HOVRW's competition here
SKYH-WT vs ASTR Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, ASTR has a market cap of 12.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while ASTR trades at $0.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas ASTR's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ASTR's ROE of -51.92%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to ASTR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check ASTR's competition here
SKYH-WT vs AIRI Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, AIRI has a market cap of 11.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while AIRI trades at $3.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas AIRI's P/E ratio is -5.68. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AIRI's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to AIRI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check AIRI's competition here
SKYH-WT vs AULT Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, AULT has a market cap of 8.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while AULT trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas AULT's P/E ratio is 0.00. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to AULT's ROE of -1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to AULT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check AULT's competition here
SKYH-WT vs KWESW Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, KWESW has a market cap of 7.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while KWESW trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas KWESW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to KWESW's ROE of -2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to KWESW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check KWESW's competition here
SKYH-WT vs KWE Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, KWE has a market cap of 6M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while KWE trades at $10.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas KWE's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to KWE's ROE of -2.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to KWE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check KWE's competition here
SKYH-WT vs ASTC Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, ASTC has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while ASTC trades at $2.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas ASTC's P/E ratio is -0.34. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to ASTC's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to ASTC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check ASTC's competition here
SKYH-WT vs KITT Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, KITT has a market cap of 5M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while KITT trades at $0.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas KITT's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to KITT's ROE of +19.56%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to KITT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check KITT's competition here
SKYH-WT vs LILMW Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, LILMW has a market cap of 4M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while LILMW trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas LILMW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to LILMW's ROE of -3.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to LILMW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check LILMW's competition here
SKYH-WT vs MNTS Comparison February 2026
SKYH-WT plays a significant role within the Industrials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SKYH-WT stands at 20.3M. In comparison, MNTS has a market cap of 2.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SKYH-WT is priced at $0.69, while MNTS trades at $5.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SKYH-WT currently has a P/E ratio of -2.05, whereas MNTS's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, SKYH-WT's ROE is -0.04%, compared to MNTS's ROE of +5.82%. Regarding short-term risk, SKYH-WT is more volatile compared to MNTS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SKYH-WT.Check MNTS's competition here