Silvergate Capital Corporation
Silvergate Capital Corporation SI Peers
See (SI) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Banks - Regional Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SI | $1.25 | N/A | 39.6M | -0.04 | -$29.59 | N/A |
| HDB | $75.37 | +0.84% | 192.4B | 23.26 | $3.24 | +0.79% |
| MFG | $5.56 | +1.28% | 69.9B | 11.35 | $0.49 | +1.15% |
| PNC | $173.67 | -0.82% | 68.7B | 12.27 | $14.15 | +3.66% |
| USB-PP | $22.57 | +0.31% | 68.3B | 4.87 | $4.64 | +4.56% |
| USB | $43.57 | -0.43% | 67.9B | 10.78 | $4.04 | +4.56% |
| USB-PS | $18.75 | +0.54% | 67.8B | N/A | N/A | +4.56% |
| ITUB | $6.59 | -0.60% | 67.5B | 9.55 | $0.69 | +7.30% |
| USB-PH | $20.61 | -0.43% | 67.2B | 4.44 | $4.64 | +4.56% |
| USB-PA | $833.00 | -0.84% | 66.6B | 237.32 | $3.51 | +4.56% |
Stock Comparison
SI vs HDB Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, HDB has a market cap of 192.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while HDB trades at $75.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas HDB's P/E ratio is 23.26. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to HDB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to HDB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs MFG Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, MFG has a market cap of 69.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while MFG trades at $5.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas MFG's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to MFG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to MFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs PNC Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, PNC has a market cap of 68.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while PNC trades at $173.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas PNC's P/E ratio is 12.27. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to PNC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to PNC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs USB-PP Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, USB-PP has a market cap of 68.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while USB-PP trades at $22.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas USB-PP's P/E ratio is 4.87. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to USB-PP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to USB-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs USB Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, USB has a market cap of 67.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while USB trades at $43.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas USB's P/E ratio is 10.78. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to USB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to USB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs USB-PS Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, USB-PS has a market cap of 67.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while USB-PS trades at $18.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas USB-PS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to USB-PS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to USB-PS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs ITUB Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, ITUB has a market cap of 67.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while ITUB trades at $6.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ITUB's P/E ratio is 9.55. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to ITUB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to ITUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs USB-PH Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, USB-PH has a market cap of 67.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while USB-PH trades at $20.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas USB-PH's P/E ratio is 4.44. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to USB-PH's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to USB-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs USB-PA Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, USB-PA has a market cap of 66.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while USB-PA trades at $833.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas USB-PA's P/E ratio is 237.32. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to USB-PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to USB-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs LYG Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, LYG has a market cap of 64.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while LYG trades at $4.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas LYG's P/E ratio is 12.35. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to LYG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to LYG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs IBN Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, IBN has a market cap of 61B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while IBN trades at $34.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas IBN's P/E ratio is 20.49. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to IBN's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to IBN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs DB Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, DB has a market cap of 53.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while DB trades at $27.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas DB's P/E ratio is 14.85. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to DB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to DB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs TFC Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, TFC has a market cap of 51.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while TFC trades at $39.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas TFC's P/E ratio is -207.74. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to TFC's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to TFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs BSBR Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, BSBR has a market cap of 38.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while BSBR trades at $5.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas BSBR's P/E ratio is 17.33. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to BSBR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to BSBR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs HBANL Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, HBANL has a market cap of 36.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while HBANL trades at $24.79.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas HBANL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to HBANL's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to HBANL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs HBANM Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, HBANM has a market cap of 31.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while HBANM trades at $21.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas HBANM's P/E ratio is 27.66. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to HBANM's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to HBANM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs MTB Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, MTB has a market cap of 29.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while MTB trades at $182.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas MTB's P/E ratio is 12.13. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to MTB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to MTB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs TFC-PI Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, TFC-PI has a market cap of 29.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while TFC-PI trades at $22.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas TFC-PI's P/E ratio is 4.95. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to TFC-PI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to TFC-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs BBD Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, BBD has a market cap of 28.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while BBD trades at $2.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas BBD's P/E ratio is 9.62. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to BBD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to BBD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs KB Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, KB has a market cap of 28B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while KB trades at $74.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas KB's P/E ratio is 7.05. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to KB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to KB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs BBDO Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, BBDO has a market cap of 27.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while BBDO trades at $2.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas BBDO's P/E ratio is 8.27. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to BBDO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to BBDO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs TFC-PO Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, TFC-PO has a market cap of 27.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while TFC-PO trades at $20.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas TFC-PO's P/E ratio is 4.65. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to TFC-PO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to TFC-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs FITB Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, FITB has a market cap of 25.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while FITB trades at $38.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas FITB's P/E ratio is 12.12. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to FITB's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to FITB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs USB-PR Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, USB-PR has a market cap of 25.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while USB-PR trades at $16.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas USB-PR's P/E ratio is 3.50. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to USB-PR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to USB-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs HBANP Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, HBANP has a market cap of 24.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while HBANP trades at $17.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas HBANP's P/E ratio is 21.95. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to HBANP's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to HBANP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs TFC-PR Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, TFC-PR has a market cap of 24.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while TFC-PR trades at $18.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas TFC-PR's P/E ratio is 4.15. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to TFC-PR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to TFC-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs FCNCA Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, FCNCA has a market cap of 24.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while FCNCA trades at $1,849.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas FCNCA's P/E ratio is 10.71. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to FCNCA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to FCNCA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs FCNCP Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, FCNCP has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while FCNCP trades at $20.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas FCNCP's P/E ratio is 0.36. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to FCNCP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to FCNCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs USB-PQ Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, USB-PQ has a market cap of 23.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while USB-PQ trades at $15.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas USB-PQ's P/E ratio is 3.25. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to USB-PQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to USB-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs RF-PF Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, RF-PF has a market cap of 23.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while RF-PF trades at $25.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas RF-PF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to RF-PF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to RF-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs FCNCO Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, FCNCO has a market cap of 23B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while FCNCO trades at $21.52.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas FCNCO's P/E ratio is 0.37. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to FCNCO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to FCNCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs HBAN Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, HBAN has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while HBAN trades at $15.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas HBAN's P/E ratio is 12.02. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to HBAN's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to HBAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs SHG Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, SHG has a market cap of 20.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while SHG trades at $41.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas SHG's P/E ratio is 6.45. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to SHG's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to SHG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs RF Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, RF has a market cap of 19.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while RF trades at $21.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas RF's P/E ratio is 10.35. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to RF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to RF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs RF-PC Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, RF-PC has a market cap of 19B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while RF-PC trades at $22.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas RF-PC's P/E ratio is 9.44. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to RF-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to RF-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs KEY-PK Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, KEY-PK has a market cap of 17.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while KEY-PK trades at $20.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas KEY-PK's P/E ratio is 15.26. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to KEY-PK's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to KEY-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs CFG Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, CFG has a market cap of 17.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while CFG trades at $40.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas CFG's P/E ratio is 12.80. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to CFG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to CFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs KEY Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, KEY has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while KEY trades at $15.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas KEY's P/E ratio is -83.42. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to KEY's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to KEY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs KEY-PL Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, KEY-PL has a market cap of 17.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while KEY-PL trades at $24.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas KEY-PL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to KEY-PL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to KEY-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs FITBI Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, FITBI has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while FITBI trades at $25.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas FITBI's P/E ratio is 7.38. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to FITBI's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to FITBI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs KEY-PI Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, KEY-PI has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while KEY-PI trades at $24.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas KEY-PI's P/E ratio is 9.89. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to KEY-PI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to KEY-PI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs KEY-PJ Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, KEY-PJ has a market cap of 17.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while KEY-PJ trades at $20.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas KEY-PJ's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to KEY-PJ's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to KEY-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs BAP Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, BAP has a market cap of 16.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while BAP trades at $211.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas BAP's P/E ratio is 10.90. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to BAP's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to BAP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs FITBP Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, FITBP has a market cap of 16.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while FITBP trades at $24.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas FITBP's P/E ratio is 6.93. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to FITBP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to FITBP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs RF-PE Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, RF-PE has a market cap of 15.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while RF-PE trades at $17.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas RF-PE's P/E ratio is 7.06. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to RF-PE's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to RF-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs BCH Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, BCH has a market cap of 15.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while BCH trades at $30.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas BCH's P/E ratio is 11.25. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to BCH's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to BCH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs CFG-PD Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, CFG-PD has a market cap of 14.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while CFG-PD trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas CFG-PD's P/E ratio is 5.29. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to CFG-PD's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to CFG-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs VLYPN Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, VLYPN has a market cap of 13.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while VLYPN trades at $24.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas VLYPN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to VLYPN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to VLYPN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs FITBO Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, FITBO has a market cap of 13.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while FITBO trades at $20.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas FITBO's P/E ratio is 5.84. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to FITBO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to FITBO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs FHN-PB Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, FHN-PB has a market cap of 12.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while FHN-PB trades at $25.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas FHN-PB's P/E ratio is 15.14. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to FHN-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to FHN-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs FHN-PC Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, FHN-PC has a market cap of 12.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while FHN-PC trades at $25.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas FHN-PC's P/E ratio is 14.93. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to FHN-PC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to FHN-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs CFG-PH Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, CFG-PH has a market cap of 12B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while CFG-PH trades at $25.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas CFG-PH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to CFG-PH's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to CFG-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs FHN-PE Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, FHN-PE has a market cap of 11.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while FHN-PE trades at $22.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas FHN-PE's P/E ratio is 13.60. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to FHN-PE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to FHN-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs CIB Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, CIB has a market cap of 10.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while CIB trades at $41.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas CIB's P/E ratio is 6.49. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to CIB's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to CIB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs WF Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, WF has a market cap of 10.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while WF trades at $41.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas WF's P/E ratio is 5.18. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to WF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to WF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs FHN Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, FHN has a market cap of 10.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while FHN trades at $19.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas FHN's P/E ratio is 13.78. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to FHN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to FHN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs SSB Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, SSB has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while SSB trades at $87.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas SSB's P/E ratio is 14.09. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to SSB's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to SSB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs FHN-PD Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, FHN-PD has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while FHN-PD trades at $24.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas FHN-PD's P/E ratio is 14.88. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to FHN-PD's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to FHN-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs WBS Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, WBS has a market cap of 8.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while WBS trades at $51.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas WBS's P/E ratio is 11.78. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to WBS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to WBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs FHN-PF Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, FHN-PF has a market cap of 8.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while FHN-PF trades at $16.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas FHN-PF's P/E ratio is 10.08. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to FHN-PF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to FHN-PF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs CBSH Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, CBSH has a market cap of 8.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while CBSH trades at $63.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas CBSH's P/E ratio is 15.63. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to CBSH's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to CBSH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs CFG-PE Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, CFG-PE has a market cap of 8.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while CFG-PE trades at $19.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas CFG-PE's P/E ratio is 4.03. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to CFG-PE's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to CFG-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs PNFP Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, PNFP has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while PNFP trades at $106.34.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas PNFP's P/E ratio is 17.18. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to PNFP's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to PNFP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs CFR Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, CFR has a market cap of 8.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while CFR trades at $126.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas CFR's P/E ratio is 13.95. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to CFR's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to CFR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs WTFCM Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, WTFCM has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while WTFCM trades at $25.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas WTFCM's P/E ratio is 3.53. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to WTFCM's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to WTFCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs WTFC Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, WTFC has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while WTFC trades at $119.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas WTFC's P/E ratio is 11.81. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to WTFC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to WTFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs WAL Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, WAL has a market cap of 8B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while WAL trades at $72.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas WAL's P/E ratio is 9.83. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to WAL's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to WAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs UMBF Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, UMBF has a market cap of 7.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while UMBF trades at $103.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas UMBF's P/E ratio is 12.97. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to UMBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to UMBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs ONBPO Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, ONBPO has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while ONBPO trades at $24.57.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ONBPO's P/E ratio is 27.58. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to ONBPO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to ONBPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs ONB Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, ONB has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while ONB trades at $20.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ONB's P/E ratio is 12.12. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to ONB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to ONB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs GGAL Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, GGAL has a market cap of 7.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while GGAL trades at $57.98.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas GGAL's P/E ratio is 7.28. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to GGAL's ROE of +0.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to GGAL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs ONBPP Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, ONBPP has a market cap of 7.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while ONBPP trades at $24.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ONBPP's P/E ratio is 27.53. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to ONBPP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to ONBPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs CMA Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, CMA has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while CMA trades at $57.12.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas CMA's P/E ratio is 10.90. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to CMA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to CMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs BSMX Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, BSMX has a market cap of 7.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while BSMX trades at $5.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas BSMX's P/E ratio is 4.88. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to BSMX's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to BSMX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs BPOP Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, BPOP has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while BPOP trades at $103.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas BPOP's P/E ratio is 10.68. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to BPOP's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to BPOP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs ZION Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, ZION has a market cap of 7B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while ZION trades at $47.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ZION's P/E ratio is 9.40. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to ZION's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to ZION. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs SNV Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, SNV has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while SNV trades at $47.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas SNV's P/E ratio is 13.47. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to SNV's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to SNV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs PB Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, PB has a market cap of 6.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while PB trades at $69.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas PB's P/E ratio is 13.30. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to PB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs SNV-PD Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, SNV-PD has a market cap of 6.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while SNV-PD trades at $24.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas SNV-PD's P/E ratio is 5.15. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to SNV-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to SNV-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs BOKF Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, BOKF has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while BOKF trades at $94.42.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas BOKF's P/E ratio is 10.84. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to BOKF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to BOKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs HOMB Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, HOMB has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while HOMB trades at $28.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas HOMB's P/E ratio is 13.53. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to HOMB's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to HOMB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs CADE Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, CADE has a market cap of 5.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while CADE trades at $30.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas CADE's P/E ratio is 11.17. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to CADE's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to CADE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs BMA Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, BMA has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while BMA trades at $84.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas BMA's P/E ratio is 18.96. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to BMA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to BMA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs BXS Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, BXS has a market cap of 5.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while BXS trades at $28.76.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas BXS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to BXS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to BXS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs UBSI Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, UBSI has a market cap of 5.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while UBSI trades at $36.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas UBSI's P/E ratio is 13.64. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to UBSI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to UBSI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs FFIN Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, FFIN has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while FFIN trades at $35.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas FFIN's P/E ratio is 21.77. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to FFIN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to FFIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs OZK Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, OZK has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while OZK trades at $44.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas OZK's P/E ratio is 7.26. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to OZK's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to OZK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs FNB Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, FNB has a market cap of 5B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while FNB trades at $13.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas FNB's P/E ratio is 10.91. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to FNB's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to FNB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs COLB Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, COLB has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while COLB trades at $23.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas COLB's P/E ratio is 9.86. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to COLB's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to COLB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs VLY Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, VLY has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while VLY trades at $8.77.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas VLY's P/E ratio is 12.71. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to VLY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to VLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs VLYPO Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, VLYPO has a market cap of 4.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while VLYPO trades at $25.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas VLYPO's P/E ratio is 22.54. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to VLYPO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to VLYPO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs VLYPP Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, VLYPP has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while VLYPP trades at $24.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas VLYPP's P/E ratio is 22.10. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to VLYPP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to VLYPP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs FLG Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, FLG has a market cap of 4.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while FLG trades at $11.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas FLG's P/E ratio is -4.89. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to FLG's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to FLG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs GBCI Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, GBCI has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while GBCI trades at $41.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas GBCI's P/E ratio is 22.53. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to GBCI's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to GBCI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs HWC Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, HWC has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while HWC trades at $54.67.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas HWC's P/E ratio is 10.09. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to HWC's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to HWC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs HWCPZ Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, HWCPZ has a market cap of 4.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while HWCPZ trades at $24.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas HWCPZ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to HWCPZ's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to HWCPZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs NYCB Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, NYCB has a market cap of 4.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while NYCB trades at $10.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas NYCB's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to NYCB's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is less volatile compared to NYCB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs AUB Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, AUB has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while AUB trades at $30.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas AUB's P/E ratio is 14.10. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to AUB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to AUB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.
SI vs ABCB Comparison
SI plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SI stands at 39.6M. In comparison, ABCB has a market cap of 4.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SI is priced at $1.25, while ABCB trades at $61.41.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SI currently has a P/E ratio of -0.04, whereas ABCB's P/E ratio is 11.41. In terms of profitability, SI's ROE is -0.85%, compared to ABCB's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SI is more volatile compared to ABCB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SI.