Smithfield Foods, Inc.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, ADM has a market cap of 22.80B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while ADM trades at $47.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas ADM's P/E ratio is 13.01. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ADM's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to ADM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, TSN has a market cap of 19.58B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while TSN trades at $56.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas TSN's P/E ratio is 18.94. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TSN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to TSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, WLMIY has a market cap of 14.85B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while WLMIY trades at $23.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas WLMIY's P/E ratio is 12.72. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WLMIY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to WLMIY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, WLMIF has a market cap of 14.36B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while WLMIF trades at $2.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas WLMIF's P/E ratio is 12.11. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WLMIF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to WLMIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, BG has a market cap of 10.43B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while BG trades at $77.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas BG's P/E ratio is 9.74. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BG's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to BG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, MNHVF has a market cap of 9.86B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while MNHVF trades at $19.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas MNHVF's P/E ratio is 18.51. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MNHVF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to MNHVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, MHGVY has a market cap of 9.57B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while MHGVY trades at $18.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas MHGVY's P/E ratio is 17.96. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MHGVY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to MHGVY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, SALRF has a market cap of 7.22B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while SALRF trades at $54.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas SALRF's P/E ratio is 25.37. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SALRF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to SALRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, KLKBF has a market cap of 6.87B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while KLKBF trades at $6.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas KLKBF's P/E ratio is 11.43. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KLKBF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to KLKBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, PPOKF has a market cap of 6.44B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while PPOKF trades at $0.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas PPOKF's P/E ratio is 39.30. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PPOKF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to PPOKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, KLKBY has a market cap of 6.35B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while KLKBY trades at $5.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas KLKBY's P/E ratio is 35.47. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KLKBY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to KLKBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, CHPFF has a market cap of 6.22B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while CHPFF trades at $0.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas CHPFF's P/E ratio is 10.57. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CHPFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to CHPFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, SALRY has a market cap of 6.21B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while SALRY trades at $11.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas SALRY's P/E ratio is 21.52. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SALRY's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to SALRY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, CPOUF has a market cap of 6.15B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while CPOUF trades at $0.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas CPOUF's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CPOUF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to CPOUF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, AAYYY has a market cap of 5.61B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while AAYYY trades at $9.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas AAYYY's P/E ratio is 25.86. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AAYYY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to AAYYY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, CALM has a market cap of 4.50B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while CALM trades at $92.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas CALM's P/E ratio is 4.47. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CALM's ROE of +0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to CALM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, AGRO has a market cap of 4.26B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while AGRO trades at $8.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas AGRO's P/E ratio is 9.46. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AGRO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to AGRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, ACOPY has a market cap of 3.92B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while ACOPY trades at $5.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas ACOPY's P/E ratio is 38.21. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ACOPY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to ACOPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, BKFKF has a market cap of 2.82B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while BKFKF trades at $47.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas BKFKF's P/E ratio is 28.33. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BKFKF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to BKFKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, IBA has a market cap of 2.65B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while IBA trades at $53.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas IBA's P/E ratio is 7.77. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IBA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to IBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, IDBHF has a market cap of 2.34B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while IDBHF trades at $3.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas IDBHF's P/E ratio is 11.14. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IDBHF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to IDBHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, GARPF has a market cap of 2.28B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while GARPF trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas GARPF's P/E ratio is 6.00. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GARPF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to GARPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, UPBMF has a market cap of 2.18B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while UPBMF trades at $3.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas UPBMF's P/E ratio is 14.03. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UPBMF's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to UPBMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, KNKZF has a market cap of 1.98B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while KNKZF trades at $60.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas KNKZF's P/E ratio is 10.17. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KNKZF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to KNKZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, ASTVF has a market cap of 1.88B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while ASTVF trades at $9.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas ASTVF's P/E ratio is 7.15. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ASTVF's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to ASTVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, FDP has a market cap of 1.60B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while FDP trades at $33.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas FDP's P/E ratio is 11.29. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FDP's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to FDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, VITL has a market cap of 1.58B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while VITL trades at $35.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas VITL's P/E ratio is 30.12. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VITL's ROE of +0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to VITL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, SLCJY has a market cap of 1.53B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while SLCJY trades at $3.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas SLCJY's P/E ratio is 17.35. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SLCJY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to SLCJY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, DOLE has a market cap of 1.39B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while DOLE trades at $14.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas DOLE's P/E ratio is 8.99. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DOLE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to DOLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, DNDPF has a market cap of 1.29B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while DNDPF trades at $14.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas DNDPF's P/E ratio is -35.89. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DNDPF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to DNDPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, PTABF has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while PTABF trades at $0.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas PTABF's P/E ratio is 9.74. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PTABF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to PTABF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, CTTQF has a market cap of 985.19M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while CTTQF trades at $2.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas CTTQF's P/E ratio is 70.67. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CTTQF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to CTTQF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, GRCLF has a market cap of 978.11M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while GRCLF trades at $4.41.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas GRCLF's P/E ratio is 24.50. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GRCLF's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to GRCLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, EDESY has a market cap of 931.97M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while EDESY trades at $24.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas EDESY's P/E ratio is 27.53. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EDESY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to EDESY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, MRVSY has a market cap of 762.61M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while MRVSY trades at $5.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas MRVSY's P/E ratio is -3.14. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MRVSY's ROE of -6.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to MRVSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, GRGSF has a market cap of 673.46M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while GRGSF trades at $6.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas GRGSF's P/E ratio is 2.86. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GRGSF's ROE of -0.50%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to GRGSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, PPLFF has a market cap of 613.80M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while PPLFF trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas PPLFF's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PPLFF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to PPLFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, MHPSY has a market cap of 599.41M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while MHPSY trades at $5.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas MHPSY's P/E ratio is 4.48. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MHPSY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to MHPSY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, SISAF has a market cap of 561.56M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while SISAF trades at $54.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas SISAF's P/E ratio is 4.93. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SISAF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to SISAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, AAGRY has a market cap of 546.61M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while AAGRY trades at $1.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas AAGRY's P/E ratio is 7.47. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AAGRY's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to AAGRY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, ASAGF has a market cap of 530.43M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while ASAGF trades at $0.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas ASAGF's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ASAGF's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to ASAGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, PPLFY has a market cap of 492.40M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while PPLFY trades at $3.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas PPLFY's P/E ratio is 5.47. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PPLFY's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to PPLFY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, BRCPF has a market cap of 441.14M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while BRCPF trades at $4.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas BRCPF's P/E ratio is 11.31. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BRCPF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to BRCPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, ORENF has a market cap of 432.81M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while ORENF trades at $4.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas ORENF's P/E ratio is 7.29. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ORENF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to ORENF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, SLMCF has a market cap of 429.17M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while SLMCF trades at $5.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas SLMCF's P/E ratio is 22.00. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SLMCF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to SLMCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, SLCJF has a market cap of 382.08M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while SLCJF trades at $2.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas SLCJF's P/E ratio is 8.80. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SLCJF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to SLCJF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, AEPLF has a market cap of 373.46M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while AEPLF trades at $9.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas AEPLF's P/E ratio is 6.36. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AEPLF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to AEPLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, LND has a market cap of 359.61M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while LND trades at $3.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas LND's P/E ratio is 7.85. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LND's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to LND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, CHSCN has a market cap of 336.34M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while CHSCN trades at $25.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas CHSCN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CHSCN's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to CHSCN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, CHSCP has a market cap of 335.03M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while CHSCP trades at $27.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas CHSCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CHSCP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to CHSCP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, CHSCL has a market cap of 334.82M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while CHSCL trades at $25.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas CHSCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CHSCL's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to CHSCL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, CHSCM has a market cap of 334.53M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while CHSCM trades at $24.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas CHSCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CHSCM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to CHSCM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, CHSCO has a market cap of 334.00M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while CHSCO trades at $26.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas CHSCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CHSCO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to CHSCO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, ALFDF has a market cap of 284.05M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while ALFDF trades at $7.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas ALFDF's P/E ratio is 9.35. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ALFDF's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to ALFDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, LMNR has a market cap of 279.16M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while LMNR trades at $15.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas LMNR's P/E ratio is 35.98. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LMNR's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to LMNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, UVPOF has a market cap of 244.40M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while UVPOF trades at $0.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas UVPOF's P/E ratio is 6.50. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UVPOF's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to UVPOF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, SARDF has a market cap of 224.41M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while SARDF trades at $2.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas SARDF's P/E ratio is 18.46. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SARDF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to SARDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, ALCO has a market cap of 223.78M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while ALCO trades at $29.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas ALCO's P/E ratio is -4.94. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ALCO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to ALCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, AFRI has a market cap of 214.67M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while AFRI trades at $7.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas AFRI's P/E ratio is -13.30. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AFRI's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to AFRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, SARDY has a market cap of 175.04M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while SARDY trades at $9.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas SARDY's P/E ratio is 18.72. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SARDY's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to SARDY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, STNT has a market cap of 162.45M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while STNT trades at $6.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas STNT's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to STNT's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to STNT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, AGFS has a market cap of 161.15M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while AGFS trades at $3.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas AGFS's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AGFS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to AGFS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, DDEJF has a market cap of 129.46M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while DDEJF trades at $1.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas DDEJF's P/E ratio is 3.26. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DDEJF's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to DDEJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, DNDEF has a market cap of 79.15M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while DNDEF trades at $15.62.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas DNDEF's P/E ratio is -38.66. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DNDEF's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to DNDEF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, VFF has a market cap of 77.23M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while VFF trades at $0.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas VFF's P/E ratio is -2.15. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VFF's ROE of -0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to VFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, HLKKF has a market cap of 48.84M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while HLKKF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas HLKKF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HLKKF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to HLKKF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, NNUTU has a market cap of 41.63M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while NNUTU trades at $3,750.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas NNUTU's P/E ratio is 28.31. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NNUTU's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to NNUTU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, AASZF has a market cap of 29.17M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while AASZF trades at $0.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas AASZF's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AASZF's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to AASZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, LOCL has a market cap of 26.80M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while LOCL trades at $2.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas LOCL's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to LOCL's ROE of +2.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to LOCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, GARPY has a market cap of 23.97M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while GARPY trades at $18.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas GARPY's P/E ratio is 6.59. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GARPY's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to GARPY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, PME has a market cap of 23.20M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while PME trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas PME's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PME's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to PME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, CTUNF has a market cap of 16.11M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while CTUNF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas CTUNF's P/E ratio is -0.62. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CTUNF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to CTUNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, CLAD has a market cap of 14.99M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while CLAD trades at $1.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas CLAD's P/E ratio is -33.67. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CLAD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to CLAD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, DTCK has a market cap of 14.70M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while DTCK trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas DTCK's P/E ratio is 30.01. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to DTCK's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to DTCK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, AFRIW has a market cap of 13.41M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while AFRIW trades at $0.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas AFRIW's P/E ratio is -21.70. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AFRIW's ROE of -1.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to AFRIW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, OPTHF has a market cap of 13.40M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while OPTHF trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas OPTHF's P/E ratio is -2.78. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OPTHF's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to OPTHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, PRCF has a market cap of 12.02M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while PRCF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas PRCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PRCF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to PRCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, CMGHY has a market cap of 11.37M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while CMGHY trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas CMGHY's P/E ratio is -8.84. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CMGHY's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to CMGHY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, SANW has a market cap of 11.18M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while SANW trades at $5.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas SANW's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SANW's ROE of -1.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to SANW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, APPHW has a market cap of 10.33M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while APPHW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas APPHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to APPHW's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to APPHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, APPH has a market cap of 10.33M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while APPH trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas APPH's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to APPH's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to APPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, SDOT has a market cap of 8.56M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while SDOT trades at $1.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas SDOT's P/E ratio is 1.16. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SDOT's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to SDOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, PEASF has a market cap of 7.10M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while PEASF trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas PEASF's P/E ratio is -1.56. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PEASF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to PEASF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, SPZI has a market cap of 6.96M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while SPZI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas SPZI's P/E ratio is -1.20. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SPZI's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to SPZI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, HERB has a market cap of 5.20M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while HERB trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas HERB's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HERB's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to HERB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, CMGHF has a market cap of 4.28M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while CMGHF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas CMGHF's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CMGHF's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to CMGHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, AGRI has a market cap of 3.71M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while AGRI trades at $1.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas AGRI's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AGRI's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to AGRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, EDBL has a market cap of 2.76M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while EDBL trades at $1.92.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas EDBL's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EDBL's ROE of -11.71%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to EDBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, EDBLW has a market cap of 2.72M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while EDBLW trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas EDBLW's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EDBLW's ROE of -11.71%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to EDBLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, AQB has a market cap of 2.48M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while AQB trades at $0.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas AQB's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AQB's ROE of -1.60%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to AQB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, KAL has a market cap of 2.13M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while KAL trades at $1.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas KAL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KAL's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to KAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, KALWW has a market cap of 2.13M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while KALWW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas KALWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KALWW's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to KALWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, GSFD has a market cap of 1.82M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while GSFD trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas GSFD's P/E ratio is -0.16. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GSFD's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to GSFD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, GCEH has a market cap of 1.76M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while GCEH trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas GCEH's P/E ratio is 0.02. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GCEH's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to GCEH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, RSSFF has a market cap of 1.69M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while RSSFF trades at $0.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas RSSFF's P/E ratio is -2.12. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RSSFF's ROE of -5.55%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to RSSFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, MINE has a market cap of 1.26M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while MINE trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas MINE's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MINE's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to MINE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, STEV has a market cap of 1.20M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while STEV trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas STEV's P/E ratio is -0.21. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to STEV's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to STEV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, AAGR has a market cap of 1.15M. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while AAGR trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas AAGR's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AAGR's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to AAGR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, PNDHF has a market cap of 847363.00. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while PNDHF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas PNDHF's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PNDHF's ROE of +0.51%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to PNDHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, IGPFF has a market cap of 462979.00. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while IGPFF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas IGPFF's P/E ratio is 3.03. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IGPFF's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to IGPFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, GLGLF has a market cap of 430015.00. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while GLGLF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas GLGLF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to GLGLF's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to GLGLF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, AAGRW has a market cap of 315464.00. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while AAGRW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas AAGRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AAGRW's ROE of +1.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to AAGRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, HERF has a market cap of 245182.00. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while HERF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas HERF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HERF's ROE of +0.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to HERF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, MSAH has a market cap of 241135.00. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while MSAH trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas MSAH's P/E ratio is 0.17. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MSAH's ROE of +0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to MSAH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, TAER has a market cap of 232968.00. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while TAER trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas TAER's P/E ratio is -0.80. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TAER's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to TAER. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, MSRM has a market cap of 221637.00. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while MSRM trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas MSRM's P/E ratio is -1.32. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MSRM's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to MSRM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, SHMP has a market cap of 123627.00. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while SHMP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas SHMP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SHMP's ROE of +1.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to SHMP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, AGRIW has a market cap of 69232.00. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while AGRIW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas AGRIW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AGRIW's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to AGRIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, CHYI has a market cap of 66074.00. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while CHYI trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas CHYI's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CHYI's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to CHYI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, OGAA has a market cap of 46364.00. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while OGAA trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas OGAA's P/E ratio is -0.05. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OGAA's ROE of -2.82%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to OGAA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, SUWN has a market cap of 19963.00. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while SUWN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas SUWN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SUWN's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to SUWN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, SIAF has a market cap of 18107.00. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while SIAF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas SIAF's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SIAF's ROE of -0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to SIAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, URYL has a market cap of 15104.00. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while URYL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas URYL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to URYL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to URYL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, FFRMF has a market cap of 1708.00. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while FFRMF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas FFRMF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FFRMF's ROE of -2.83%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to FFRMF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, BIQIF has a market cap of 1003.00. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while BIQIF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas BIQIF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BIQIF's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to BIQIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, FLAF has a market cap of 921.00. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while FLAF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas FLAF's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FLAF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to FLAF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, CFPI has a market cap of 384.00. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while CFPI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas CFPI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CFPI's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to CFPI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, URBF has a market cap of 250.00. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while URBF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas URBF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to URBF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is less volatile compared to URBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, KALRQ has a market cap of 184.00. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while KALRQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas KALRQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to KALRQ's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to KALRQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, BYIN comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while BYIN trades at $4.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas BYIN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BYIN's ROE of +0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to BYIN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, CAOX comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while CAOX trades at $601.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas CAOX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CAOX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to CAOX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, TSLLF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while TSLLF trades at $3.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas TSLLF's P/E ratio is 19.15. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TSLLF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to TSLLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.

SFD plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SFD stands at 8.88B. In comparison, OCESP comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SFD is priced at $22.60, while OCESP trades at $16.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SFD currently has a P/E ratio of 9.96, whereas OCESP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SFD's ROE is +0.08%, compared to OCESP's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SFD is more volatile compared to OCESP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SFD.