Standard Chartered PLC

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, JPM has a market cap of 703.12B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while JPM trades at $252.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas JPM's P/E ratio is 12.40. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JPM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to JPM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, JPM-PC has a market cap of 701.75B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while JPM-PC trades at $24.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas JPM-PC's P/E ratio is 1.84. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JPM-PC's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to JPM-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, JPM-PD has a market cap of 701.36B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while JPM-PD trades at $24.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas JPM-PD's P/E ratio is 1.79. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JPM-PD's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to JPM-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, BAC-PL has a market cap of 442.50B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while BAC-PL trades at $1,175.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas BAC-PL's P/E ratio is 334.38. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BAC-PL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to BAC-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, IDCBF has a market cap of 335.09B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while IDCBF trades at $0.72.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas IDCBF's P/E ratio is 5.54. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IDCBF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is less volatile compared to IDCBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, IDCBY has a market cap of 319.18B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while IDCBY trades at $13.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas IDCBY's P/E ratio is 5.15. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to IDCBY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is less volatile compared to IDCBY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, BAC-PE has a market cap of 309.90B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while BAC-PE trades at $21.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas BAC-PE's P/E ratio is 6.21. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BAC-PE's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to BAC-PE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, BAC has a market cap of 309.71B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while BAC trades at $41.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas BAC's P/E ratio is 12.27. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BAC's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to BAC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, BAC-PB has a market cap of 308.45B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while BAC-PB trades at $24.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas BAC-PB's P/E ratio is 6.94. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BAC-PB's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to BAC-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, BAC-PK has a market cap of 308.29B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while BAC-PK trades at $23.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas BAC-PK's P/E ratio is 6.76. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BAC-PK's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to BAC-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, BML-PL has a market cap of 308.05B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while BML-PL trades at $21.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas BML-PL's P/E ratio is 6.14. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BML-PL's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to BML-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, BML-PH has a market cap of 308.04B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while BML-PH trades at $21.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas BML-PH's P/E ratio is 6.17. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BML-PH's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to BML-PH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, BML-PG has a market cap of 307.14B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while BML-PG trades at $21.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas BML-PG's P/E ratio is 6.19. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BML-PG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to BML-PG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, BML-PJ has a market cap of 306.59B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while BML-PJ trades at $22.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas BML-PJ's P/E ratio is 6.35. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BML-PJ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to BML-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, ACGBY has a market cap of 258.14B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while ACGBY trades at $15.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas ACGBY's P/E ratio is 5.97. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ACGBY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to ACGBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, BACRP has a market cap of 241.67B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while BACRP trades at $195.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas BACRP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BACRP's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to BACRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, WFC has a market cap of 240.26B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while WFC trades at $73.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas WFC's P/E ratio is 13.28. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WFC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to WFC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, WFCNP has a market cap of 240.16B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while WFCNP trades at $1.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas WFCNP's P/E ratio is 0.27. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WFCNP's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is less volatile compared to WFCNP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, WFC-PL has a market cap of 239.79B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while WFC-PL trades at $1,169.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas WFC-PL's P/E ratio is 241.97. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WFC-PL's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to WFC-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, WFC-PC has a market cap of 238.66B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while WFC-PC trades at $17.42.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas WFC-PC's P/E ratio is 60.07. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WFC-PC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to WFC-PC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, ACGBF has a market cap of 226.19B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while ACGBF trades at $0.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas ACGBF's P/E ratio is 5.40. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ACGBF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is less volatile compared to ACGBF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, CICHY has a market cap of 210.84B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while CICHY trades at $16.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas CICHY's P/E ratio is 4.67. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CICHY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to CICHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, BACHY has a market cap of 209.30B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while BACHY trades at $14.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas BACHY's P/E ratio is 5.43. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BACHY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to BACHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, WFC-PQ has a market cap of 200.85B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while WFC-PQ trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas WFC-PQ's P/E ratio is 5.17. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WFC-PQ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to WFC-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, HSBC has a market cap of 200.34B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while HSBC trades at $56.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas HSBC's P/E ratio is 10.40. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HSBC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to HSBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, BACHF has a market cap of 199.98B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while BACHF trades at $0.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas BACHF's P/E ratio is 5.40. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BACHF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is less volatile compared to BACHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, HBCYF has a market cap of 198.73B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while HBCYF trades at $11.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas HBCYF's P/E ratio is 10.32. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to HBCYF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to HBCYF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, CICHF has a market cap of 197.14B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while CICHF trades at $0.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas CICHF's P/E ratio is 4.56. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CICHF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to CICHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, WFC-PY has a market cap of 186.42B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while WFC-PY trades at $22.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas WFC-PY's P/E ratio is 4.72. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WFC-PY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to WFC-PY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, WFC-PR has a market cap of 184.20B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while WFC-PR trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas WFC-PR's P/E ratio is 5.17. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WFC-PR's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to WFC-PR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, CMWAY has a market cap of 180.99B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while CMWAY trades at $108.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas CMWAY's P/E ratio is 29.02. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CMWAY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is less volatile compared to CMWAY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, RY has a market cap of 170.82B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while RY trades at $120.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas RY's P/E ratio is 13.57. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to RY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, CBAUF has a market cap of 165.24B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while CBAUF trades at $98.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas CBAUF's P/E ratio is 26.43. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CBAUF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to CBAUF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, BAC-PM has a market cap of 164.61B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while BAC-PM trades at $21.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas BAC-PM's P/E ratio is 6.22. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BAC-PM's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to BAC-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, BAC-PN has a market cap of 151.99B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while BAC-PN trades at $20.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas BAC-PN's P/E ratio is 5.74. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BAC-PN's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to BAC-PN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, MUFG has a market cap of 143.44B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while MUFG trades at $12.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas MUFG's P/E ratio is 11.04. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MUFG's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to MUFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, MBFJF has a market cap of 142.69B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while MBFJF trades at $12.30.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas MBFJF's P/E ratio is 10.60. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to MBFJF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to MBFJF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, BAC-PS has a market cap of 142.35B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while BAC-PS trades at $18.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas BAC-PS's P/E ratio is 5.38. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BAC-PS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to BAC-PS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, BAC-PO has a market cap of 131.81B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while BAC-PO trades at $17.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas BAC-PO's P/E ratio is 4.98. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BAC-PO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to BAC-PO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, C has a market cap of 131.15B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while C trades at $70.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas C's P/E ratio is 11.09. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to C's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to C. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, BAC-PQ has a market cap of 127.06B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while BAC-PQ trades at $16.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas BAC-PQ's P/E ratio is 4.80. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BAC-PQ's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to BAC-PQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, BAC-PP has a market cap of 124.13B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while BAC-PP trades at $16.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas BAC-PP's P/E ratio is 4.69. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BAC-PP's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to BAC-PP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, C-PJ has a market cap of 122.21B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while C-PJ trades at $25.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas C-PJ's P/E ratio is 2.95. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to C-PJ's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to C-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, TD has a market cap of 111.84B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while TD trades at $63.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas TD's P/E ratio is 18.67. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TD's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to TD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, SAN has a market cap of 108.83B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while SAN trades at $7.19.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas SAN's P/E ratio is 7.90. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SAN's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to SAN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, BCDRF has a market cap of 107.71B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while BCDRF trades at $7.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas BCDRF's P/E ratio is 7.82. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BCDRF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to BCDRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, RY-PT has a market cap of 98.82B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while RY-PT trades at $25.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas RY-PT's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RY-PT's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to RY-PT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, UBS has a market cap of 98.07B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while UBS trades at $30.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas UBS's P/E ratio is 20.37. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to UBS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to UBS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, SMFG has a market cap of 89.81B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while SMFG trades at $14.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas SMFG's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SMFG's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to SMFG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, BBVA has a market cap of 80.82B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while BBVA trades at $14.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas BBVA's P/E ratio is 7.39. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BBVA's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to BBVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, SMFNF has a market cap of 80.65B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while SMFNF trades at $20.96.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas SMFNF's P/E ratio is 9.00. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SMFNF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is less volatile compared to SMFNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, BBVXF has a market cap of 78.58B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while BBVXF trades at $13.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas BBVXF's P/E ratio is 7.18. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BBVXF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is less volatile compared to BBVXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, BKFCF has a market cap of 72.32B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while BKFCF trades at $0.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas BKFCF's P/E ratio is 5.56. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BKFCF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is less volatile compared to BKFCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, WEBNF has a market cap of 71.83B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while WEBNF trades at $21.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas WEBNF's P/E ratio is 17.07. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WEBNF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to WEBNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, BMO has a market cap of 71.28B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while BMO trades at $97.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas BMO's P/E ratio is 13.13. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BMO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to BMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, BCMXY has a market cap of 70.88B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while BCMXY trades at $20.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas BCMXY's P/E ratio is 5.03. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BCMXY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is less volatile compared to BCMXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, NABZY has a market cap of 70.85B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while NABZY trades at $11.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas NABZY's P/E ratio is 16.11. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NABZY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to NABZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, ING has a market cap of 63.55B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while ING trades at $20.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas ING's P/E ratio is 9.82. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ING's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to ING. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, BNS has a market cap of 62.60B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while BNS trades at $50.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas BNS's P/E ratio is 14.32. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BNS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to BNS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, WFC-PZ has a market cap of 62.34B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while WFC-PZ trades at $18.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas WFC-PZ's P/E ratio is 3.90. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WFC-PZ's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to WFC-PZ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, NAUBF has a market cap of 60.71B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while NAUBF trades at $19.88.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas NAUBF's P/E ratio is 13.71. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NAUBF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to NAUBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, NU has a market cap of 60.49B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while NU trades at $12.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas NU's P/E ratio is 31.17. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NU's ROE of +0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to NU. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, WFC-PA has a market cap of 60.43B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while WFC-PA trades at $18.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas WFC-PA's P/E ratio is 3.84. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WFC-PA's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to WFC-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, CM has a market cap of 59.96B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while CM trades at $63.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas CM's P/E ratio is 11.97. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CM's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to CM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, BCS has a market cap of 58.47B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while BCS trades at $16.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas BCS's P/E ratio is 8.19. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BCS's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to BCS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, ANZGY has a market cap of 58.29B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while ANZGY trades at $19.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas ANZGY's P/E ratio is 14.20. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ANZGY's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to ANZGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, BCLYF has a market cap of 58.10B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while BCLYF trades at $4.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas BCLYF's P/E ratio is 8.14. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BCLYF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is less volatile compared to BCLYF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, INGVF has a market cap of 56.55B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while INGVF trades at $18.54.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas INGVF's P/E ratio is 8.28. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to INGVF's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is less volatile compared to INGVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, WFC-PD has a market cap of 55.00B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while WFC-PD trades at $16.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas WFC-PD's P/E ratio is 3.50. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WFC-PD's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to WFC-PD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, JPM-PJ has a market cap of 54.77B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while JPM-PJ trades at $19.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas JPM-PJ's P/E ratio is 1.46. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JPM-PJ's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to JPM-PJ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, ANEWF has a market cap of 53.37B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while ANEWF trades at $17.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas ANEWF's P/E ratio is 18.66. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ANEWF's ROE of +0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to ANEWF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, JPM-PL has a market cap of 53.18B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while JPM-PL trades at $19.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas JPM-PL's P/E ratio is 1.42. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JPM-PL's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to JPM-PL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, RBSPF has a market cap of 52.48B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while RBSPF trades at $6.51.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas RBSPF's P/E ratio is 8.56. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RBSPF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is less volatile compared to RBSPF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, JPM-PK has a market cap of 52.15B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while JPM-PK trades at $18.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas JPM-PK's P/E ratio is 1.39. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JPM-PK's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to JPM-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, JPM-PM has a market cap of 48.74B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while JPM-PM trades at $17.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas JPM-PM's P/E ratio is 1.30. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to JPM-PM's ROE of +0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to JPM-PM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, C-PK has a market cap of 48.12B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while C-PK trades at $24.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas C-PK's P/E ratio is 2.94. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to C-PK's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to C-PK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, SCBFY has a market cap of 35.12B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while SCBFY trades at $29.83.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas SCBFY's P/E ratio is 10.11. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SCBFY's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to SCBFY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, NTIOF has a market cap of 34.69B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while NTIOF trades at $88.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas NTIOF's P/E ratio is 11.60. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NTIOF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to NTIOF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, NBKCF has a market cap of 34.44B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while NBKCF trades at $18.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas NBKCF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NBKCF's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to NBKCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, TDBKF has a market cap of 31.09B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while TDBKF trades at $17.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas TDBKF's P/E ratio is 2.87. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TDBKF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to TDBKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, NWG has a market cap of 26.40B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while NWG trades at $13.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas NWG's P/E ratio is 8.61. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NWG's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to NWG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, SVNLY has a market cap of 26.00B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while SVNLY trades at $6.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas SVNLY's P/E ratio is 9.23. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SVNLY's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to SVNLY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, SVNLF has a market cap of 25.79B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while SVNLF trades at $13.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas SVNLF's P/E ratio is 9.34. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to SVNLF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to SVNLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, RBCPF has a market cap of 24.40B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while RBCPF trades at $17.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas RBCPF's P/E ratio is 1.96. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to RBCPF's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to RBCPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, BNSPF has a market cap of 22.56B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while BNSPF trades at $18.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas BNSPF's P/E ratio is 2.94. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BNSPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to BNSPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, FANDF has a market cap of 21.48B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while FANDF trades at $3.84.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas FANDF's P/E ratio is 10.11. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FANDF's ROE of +2.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to FANDF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, AAVMY has a market cap of 17.72B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while AAVMY trades at $21.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas AAVMY's P/E ratio is 6.93. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to AAVMY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to AAVMY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, ABMRF has a market cap of 17.55B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while ABMRF trades at $21.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas ABMRF's P/E ratio is 6.86. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ABMRF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is less volatile compared to ABMRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, BNDSF has a market cap of 15.40B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while BNDSF trades at $2.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas BNDSF's P/E ratio is 8.06. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BNDSF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to BNDSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, BNDSY has a market cap of 15.12B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while BNDSY trades at $5.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas BNDSY's P/E ratio is 7.79. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BNDSY's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to BNDSY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, EWBC has a market cap of 12.15B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while EWBC trades at $88.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas EWBC's P/E ratio is 10.59. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EWBC's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to EWBC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, EFGXY has a market cap of 4.62B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while EFGXY trades at $13.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas EFGXY's P/E ratio is 11.79. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EFGXY's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is less volatile compared to EFGXY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, EFGIF has a market cap of 3.97B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while EFGIF trades at $13.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas EFGIF's P/E ratio is 11.52. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to EFGIF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is less volatile compared to EFGIF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, ALORY has a market cap of 3.74B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while ALORY trades at $14.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas ALORY's P/E ratio is 6.04. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ALORY's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to ALORY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, CSGKF has a market cap of 3.51B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while CSGKF trades at $0.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas CSGKF's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CSGKF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to CSGKF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, CS has a market cap of 3.50B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while CS trades at $0.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas CS's P/E ratio is -0.31. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to CS's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to CS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, FANDY has a market cap of 2.25B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while FANDY trades at $40.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas FANDY's P/E ratio is 10.54. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FANDY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to FANDY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, NTB has a market cap of 1.76B. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while NTB trades at $41.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas NTB's P/E ratio is 8.71. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to NTB's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to NTB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, TANNL has a market cap of 989.30M. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while TANNL trades at $25.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas TANNL's P/E ratio is 34.88. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TANNL's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to TANNL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, VUPPF has a market cap of 612.97M. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while VUPPF trades at $109.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas VUPPF's P/E ratio is 13.98. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to VUPPF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to VUPPF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, PRRCF has a market cap of 547.17M. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while PRRCF trades at $9.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas PRRCF's P/E ratio is 5.34. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to PRRCF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to PRRCF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, FRC-PL has a market cap of 312.16M. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while FRC-PL trades at $1.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas FRC-PL's P/E ratio is 0.22. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to FRC-PL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is less volatile compared to FRC-PL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, BCSO has a market cap of 74.64M. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while BCSO trades at $55.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas BCSO's P/E ratio is 11.02. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to BCSO's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is less volatile compared to BCSO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, TNTTF comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while TNTTF trades at $15.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas TNTTF's P/E ratio is 2.42. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to TNTTF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to TNTTF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, ANZBY comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while ANZBY trades at $16.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas ANZBY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to ANZBY's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to ANZBY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.

SCBFF plays a significant role within the Financial Services sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SCBFF stands at 34.19B. In comparison, WBK comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, SCBFF is priced at $14.52, while WBK trades at $14.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SCBFF currently has a P/E ratio of 9.88, whereas WBK's P/E ratio is 14.31. In terms of profitability, SCBFF's ROE is +0.08%, compared to WBK's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SCBFF is more volatile compared to WBK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SCBFF.