Starbucks Corporation (NEO: SBUX.NE) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Starbucks Corporation (NEO: SBUX.NE) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBUX.NE stands at 154.1B. In comparison, MCDS.NE has a market cap of 253.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SBUX.NE is priced at CA$28.34 on the NEO, while MCDS.NE trades at CA$22.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBUX.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas MCDS.NE's P/E ratio is 1.79. In terms of profitability, SBUX.NE's ROE is -0.24%, compared to MCDS.NE's ROE of -5.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SBUX.NE is less volatile compared to MCDS.NE. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBUX.NE.Check MCDS.NE's competition here

Starbucks Corporation (NEO: SBUX.NE) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBUX.NE stands at 154.1B. In comparison, QSR.TO has a market cap of 38.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SBUX.NE is priced at CA$28.34 on the NEO, while QSR.TO trades at CA$111.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBUX.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas QSR.TO's P/E ratio is 20.31. In terms of profitability, SBUX.NE's ROE is -0.24%, compared to QSR.TO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SBUX.NE is less volatile compared to QSR.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBUX.NE.Check QSR.TO's competition here

Starbucks Corporation (NEO: SBUX.NE) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBUX.NE stands at 154.1B. In comparison, QSP-UN.TO has a market cap of 35.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SBUX.NE is priced at CA$28.34 on the NEO, while QSP-UN.TO trades at CA$106.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBUX.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas QSP-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 25.08. In terms of profitability, SBUX.NE's ROE is -0.24%, compared to QSP-UN.TO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SBUX.NE is similarly volatile compared to QSP-UN.TO. This indicates similar risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBUX.NE.Check QSP-UN.TO's competition here

Starbucks Corporation (NEO: SBUX.NE) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBUX.NE stands at 154.1B. In comparison, AW.TO has a market cap of 877.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SBUX.NE is priced at CA$28.34 on the NEO, while AW.TO trades at CA$36.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBUX.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas AW.TO's P/E ratio is 15.72. In terms of profitability, SBUX.NE's ROE is -0.24%, compared to AW.TO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SBUX.NE is less volatile compared to AW.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBUX.NE.Check AW.TO's competition here

Starbucks Corporation (NEO: SBUX.NE) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBUX.NE stands at 154.1B. In comparison, MTY.TO has a market cap of 818.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SBUX.NE is priced at CA$28.34 on the NEO, while MTY.TO trades at CA$35.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBUX.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas MTY.TO's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, SBUX.NE's ROE is -0.24%, compared to MTY.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SBUX.NE is less volatile compared to MTY.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBUX.NE.Check MTY.TO's competition here

Starbucks Corporation (NEO: SBUX.NE) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBUX.NE stands at 154.1B. In comparison, AW-UN.TO has a market cap of 538.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SBUX.NE is priced at CA$28.34 on the NEO, while AW-UN.TO trades at CA$36.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBUX.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas AW-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 18.65. In terms of profitability, SBUX.NE's ROE is -0.24%, compared to AW-UN.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SBUX.NE is less volatile compared to AW-UN.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBUX.NE.Check AW-UN.TO's competition here

Starbucks Corporation (NEO: SBUX.NE) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBUX.NE stands at 154.1B. In comparison, BPF-UN.TO has a market cap of 454.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SBUX.NE is priced at CA$28.34 on the NEO, while BPF-UN.TO trades at CA$21.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBUX.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas BPF-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, SBUX.NE's ROE is -0.24%, compared to BPF-UN.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SBUX.NE is less volatile compared to BPF-UN.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBUX.NE.Check BPF-UN.TO's competition here

Starbucks Corporation (NEO: SBUX.NE) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBUX.NE stands at 154.1B. In comparison, KEG-UN.TO has a market cap of 313.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SBUX.NE is priced at CA$28.34 on the NEO, while KEG-UN.TO trades at CA$18.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBUX.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas KEG-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 15.41. In terms of profitability, SBUX.NE's ROE is -0.24%, compared to KEG-UN.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SBUX.NE is less volatile compared to KEG-UN.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBUX.NE.Check KEG-UN.TO's competition here

Starbucks Corporation (NEO: SBUX.NE) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBUX.NE stands at 154.1B. In comparison, PZA.TO has a market cap of 312.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SBUX.NE is priced at CA$28.34 on the NEO, while PZA.TO trades at CA$12.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBUX.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas PZA.TO's P/E ratio is 13.75. In terms of profitability, SBUX.NE's ROE is -0.24%, compared to PZA.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SBUX.NE is less volatile compared to PZA.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBUX.NE.Check PZA.TO's competition here

Starbucks Corporation (NEO: SBUX.NE) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBUX.NE stands at 154.1B. In comparison, SRV-UN.TO has a market cap of 137.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SBUX.NE is priced at CA$28.34 on the NEO, while SRV-UN.TO trades at CA$16.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBUX.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas SRV-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 16.86. In terms of profitability, SBUX.NE's ROE is -0.24%, compared to SRV-UN.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SBUX.NE is less volatile compared to SRV-UN.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBUX.NE.Check SRV-UN.TO's competition here

Starbucks Corporation (NEO: SBUX.NE) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBUX.NE stands at 154.1B. In comparison, FRII.TO has a market cap of 68.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SBUX.NE is priced at CA$28.34 on the NEO, while FRII.TO trades at CA$2.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBUX.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas FRII.TO's P/E ratio is -4.67. In terms of profitability, SBUX.NE's ROE is -0.24%, compared to FRII.TO's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SBUX.NE is less volatile compared to FRII.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBUX.NE.Check FRII.TO's competition here

Starbucks Corporation (NEO: SBUX.NE) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the NEO reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SBUX.NE stands at 154.1B. In comparison, RECP.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, SBUX.NE is priced at CA$28.34 on the NEO, while RECP.TO trades at CA$20.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SBUX.NE currently has a P/E ratio of 24.86, whereas RECP.TO's P/E ratio is 25.29. In terms of profitability, SBUX.NE's ROE is -0.24%, compared to RECP.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SBUX.NE is less volatile compared to RECP.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBUX.NE.Check RECP.TO's competition here