Restaurant Brands International Inc. (TSX: QSR.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (TSX: QSR.TO) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR.TO stands at 38.6B. In comparison, MCDS.NE has a market cap of 253.5B. Regarding current trading prices, QSR.TO is priced at CA$111.11 on the TSX, while MCDS.NE trades at CA$22.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas MCDS.NE's P/E ratio is 1.79. In terms of profitability, QSR.TO's ROE is +0.35%, compared to MCDS.NE's ROE of -5.62%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR.TO is more volatile compared to MCDS.NE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.TO.Check MCDS.NE's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (TSX: QSR.TO) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR.TO stands at 38.6B. In comparison, SBUX.NE has a market cap of 154.1B. Regarding current trading prices, QSR.TO is priced at CA$111.11 on the TSX, while SBUX.NE trades at CA$28.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas SBUX.NE's P/E ratio is 24.86. In terms of profitability, QSR.TO's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SBUX.NE's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR.TO is more volatile compared to SBUX.NE. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.TO.Check SBUX.NE's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (TSX: QSR.TO) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR.TO stands at 38.6B. In comparison, QSP-UN.TO has a market cap of 35.6B. Regarding current trading prices, QSR.TO is priced at CA$111.11 on the TSX, while QSP-UN.TO trades at CA$106.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas QSP-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 25.08. In terms of profitability, QSR.TO's ROE is +0.35%, compared to QSP-UN.TO's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR.TO is more volatile compared to QSP-UN.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.TO.Check QSP-UN.TO's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (TSX: QSR.TO) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR.TO stands at 38.6B. In comparison, AW.TO has a market cap of 877.3M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR.TO is priced at CA$111.11 on the TSX, while AW.TO trades at CA$36.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas AW.TO's P/E ratio is 15.72. In terms of profitability, QSR.TO's ROE is +0.35%, compared to AW.TO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR.TO is more volatile compared to AW.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.TO.Check AW.TO's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (TSX: QSR.TO) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR.TO stands at 38.6B. In comparison, MTY.TO has a market cap of 818.9M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR.TO is priced at CA$111.11 on the TSX, while MTY.TO trades at CA$35.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas MTY.TO's P/E ratio is 7.14. In terms of profitability, QSR.TO's ROE is +0.35%, compared to MTY.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR.TO is more volatile compared to MTY.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.TO.Check MTY.TO's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (TSX: QSR.TO) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR.TO stands at 38.6B. In comparison, AW-UN.TO has a market cap of 538.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR.TO is priced at CA$111.11 on the TSX, while AW-UN.TO trades at CA$36.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas AW-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 18.65. In terms of profitability, QSR.TO's ROE is +0.35%, compared to AW-UN.TO's ROE of +0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR.TO is more volatile compared to AW-UN.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.TO.Check AW-UN.TO's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (TSX: QSR.TO) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR.TO stands at 38.6B. In comparison, BPF-UN.TO has a market cap of 454.7M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR.TO is priced at CA$111.11 on the TSX, while BPF-UN.TO trades at CA$21.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas BPF-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 11.91. In terms of profitability, QSR.TO's ROE is +0.35%, compared to BPF-UN.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR.TO is more volatile compared to BPF-UN.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.TO.Check BPF-UN.TO's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (TSX: QSR.TO) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR.TO stands at 38.6B. In comparison, KEG-UN.TO has a market cap of 313.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR.TO is priced at CA$111.11 on the TSX, while KEG-UN.TO trades at CA$18.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas KEG-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 15.41. In terms of profitability, QSR.TO's ROE is +0.35%, compared to KEG-UN.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR.TO is more volatile compared to KEG-UN.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.TO.Check KEG-UN.TO's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (TSX: QSR.TO) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR.TO stands at 38.6B. In comparison, PZA.TO has a market cap of 312.2M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR.TO is priced at CA$111.11 on the TSX, while PZA.TO trades at CA$12.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas PZA.TO's P/E ratio is 13.75. In terms of profitability, QSR.TO's ROE is +0.35%, compared to PZA.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR.TO is more volatile compared to PZA.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.TO.Check PZA.TO's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (TSX: QSR.TO) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR.TO stands at 38.6B. In comparison, SRV-UN.TO has a market cap of 137.6M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR.TO is priced at CA$111.11 on the TSX, while SRV-UN.TO trades at CA$16.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas SRV-UN.TO's P/E ratio is 16.86. In terms of profitability, QSR.TO's ROE is +0.35%, compared to SRV-UN.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR.TO is more volatile compared to SRV-UN.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.TO.Check SRV-UN.TO's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (TSX: QSR.TO) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR.TO stands at 38.6B. In comparison, FRII.TO has a market cap of 68.4M. Regarding current trading prices, QSR.TO is priced at CA$111.11 on the TSX, while FRII.TO trades at CA$2.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas FRII.TO's P/E ratio is -4.67. In terms of profitability, QSR.TO's ROE is +0.35%, compared to FRII.TO's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR.TO is more volatile compared to FRII.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.TO.Check FRII.TO's competition here

Restaurant Brands International Inc. (TSX: QSR.TO) plays a significant role within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Its performance on the TSX reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, QSR.TO stands at 38.6B. In comparison, RECP.TO has a market cap of 0. Regarding current trading prices, QSR.TO is priced at CA$111.11 on the TSX, while RECP.TO trades at CA$20.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

QSR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 20.31, whereas RECP.TO's P/E ratio is 25.29. In terms of profitability, QSR.TO's ROE is +0.35%, compared to RECP.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, QSR.TO is more volatile compared to RECP.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for QSR.TO.Check RECP.TO's competition here