Silver Bear Resources Plc
Silver Bear Resources Plc SBR.TO Peers
See (SBR.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Silver Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SBR.TO | $0.05 | N/A | 33.92M | -2.50 | -$0.02 | N/A |
| PAAS.TO | $33.11 | +4.25% | 11.99B | 27.59 | $1.20 | +1.70% |
| AG.TO | $8.24 | +4.97% | 3.99B | -21.13 | -$0.39 | +0.24% |
| MAG.TO | $25.63 | +3.98% | 2.65B | 20.84 | $1.23 | +3.18% |
| FVI.TO | $7.91 | +4.91% | 2.42B | 10.84 | $0.73 | N/A |
| FR.TO | $8.27 | +3.25% | 2.41B | -37.59 | -$0.22 | +0.24% |
| DSV.TO | $2.83 | +11.42% | 2.25B | -56.60 | -$0.05 | N/A |
| AYA.TO | $11.08 | +7.05% | 1.45B | -61.56 | -$0.18 | N/A |
| SVM.TO | $5.21 | +4.62% | 1.13B | 10.42 | $0.50 | +0.67% |
| BIG.V | $0.64 | -5.88% | 167.41M | -8.00 | -$0.08 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
SBR.TO vs PAAS.TO Comparison
SBR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBR.TO stands at 33.92M. In comparison, PAAS.TO has a market cap of 11.99B. Regarding current trading prices, SBR.TO is priced at $0.05, while PAAS.TO trades at $33.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.50, whereas PAAS.TO's P/E ratio is 27.59. In terms of profitability, SBR.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to PAAS.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SBR.TO is less volatile compared to PAAS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBR.TO.
SBR.TO vs AG.TO Comparison
SBR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBR.TO stands at 33.92M. In comparison, AG.TO has a market cap of 3.99B. Regarding current trading prices, SBR.TO is priced at $0.05, while AG.TO trades at $8.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.50, whereas AG.TO's P/E ratio is -21.13. In terms of profitability, SBR.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to AG.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SBR.TO is less volatile compared to AG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBR.TO.
SBR.TO vs MAG.TO Comparison
SBR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBR.TO stands at 33.92M. In comparison, MAG.TO has a market cap of 2.65B. Regarding current trading prices, SBR.TO is priced at $0.05, while MAG.TO trades at $25.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.50, whereas MAG.TO's P/E ratio is 20.84. In terms of profitability, SBR.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to MAG.TO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SBR.TO is less volatile compared to MAG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBR.TO.
SBR.TO vs FVI.TO Comparison
SBR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBR.TO stands at 33.92M. In comparison, FVI.TO has a market cap of 2.42B. Regarding current trading prices, SBR.TO is priced at $0.05, while FVI.TO trades at $7.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.50, whereas FVI.TO's P/E ratio is 10.84. In terms of profitability, SBR.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to FVI.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SBR.TO is less volatile compared to FVI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBR.TO.
SBR.TO vs FR.TO Comparison
SBR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBR.TO stands at 33.92M. In comparison, FR.TO has a market cap of 2.41B. Regarding current trading prices, SBR.TO is priced at $0.05, while FR.TO trades at $8.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.50, whereas FR.TO's P/E ratio is -37.59. In terms of profitability, SBR.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to FR.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SBR.TO is less volatile compared to FR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBR.TO.
SBR.TO vs DSV.TO Comparison
SBR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBR.TO stands at 33.92M. In comparison, DSV.TO has a market cap of 2.25B. Regarding current trading prices, SBR.TO is priced at $0.05, while DSV.TO trades at $2.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.50, whereas DSV.TO's P/E ratio is -56.60. In terms of profitability, SBR.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to DSV.TO's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, SBR.TO is less volatile compared to DSV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBR.TO.
SBR.TO vs AYA.TO Comparison
SBR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBR.TO stands at 33.92M. In comparison, AYA.TO has a market cap of 1.45B. Regarding current trading prices, SBR.TO is priced at $0.05, while AYA.TO trades at $11.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.50, whereas AYA.TO's P/E ratio is -61.56. In terms of profitability, SBR.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to AYA.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SBR.TO is less volatile compared to AYA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBR.TO.
SBR.TO vs SVM.TO Comparison
SBR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBR.TO stands at 33.92M. In comparison, SVM.TO has a market cap of 1.13B. Regarding current trading prices, SBR.TO is priced at $0.05, while SVM.TO trades at $5.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.50, whereas SVM.TO's P/E ratio is 10.42. In terms of profitability, SBR.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SVM.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SBR.TO is less volatile compared to SVM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBR.TO.
SBR.TO vs BIG.V Comparison
SBR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBR.TO stands at 33.92M. In comparison, BIG.V has a market cap of 167.41M. Regarding current trading prices, SBR.TO is priced at $0.05, while BIG.V trades at $0.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.50, whereas BIG.V's P/E ratio is -8.00. In terms of profitability, SBR.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to BIG.V's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SBR.TO is less volatile compared to BIG.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBR.TO.
SBR.TO vs SVRS.V Comparison
SBR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBR.TO stands at 33.92M. In comparison, SVRS.V has a market cap of 77.81M. Regarding current trading prices, SBR.TO is priced at $0.05, while SVRS.V trades at $0.16.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.50, whereas SVRS.V's P/E ratio is -3.10. In terms of profitability, SBR.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to SVRS.V's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SBR.TO is less volatile compared to SVRS.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBR.TO.
SBR.TO vs BNKR.V Comparison
SBR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBR.TO stands at 33.92M. In comparison, BNKR.V has a market cap of 46.75M. Regarding current trading prices, SBR.TO is priced at $0.05, while BNKR.V trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.50, whereas BNKR.V's P/E ratio is -1.30. In terms of profitability, SBR.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to BNKR.V's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, SBR.TO is less volatile compared to BNKR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBR.TO.
SBR.TO vs BNKR.CN Comparison
SBR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBR.TO stands at 33.92M. In comparison, BNKR.CN has a market cap of 44.44M. Regarding current trading prices, SBR.TO is priced at $0.05, while BNKR.CN trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.50, whereas BNKR.CN's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, SBR.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to BNKR.CN's ROE of -0.83%. Regarding short-term risk, SBR.TO is less volatile compared to BNKR.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBR.TO.
SBR.TO vs KUYA.CN Comparison
SBR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBR.TO stands at 33.92M. In comparison, KUYA.CN has a market cap of 30.39M. Regarding current trading prices, SBR.TO is priced at $0.05, while KUYA.CN trades at $0.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.50, whereas KUYA.CN's P/E ratio is -3.56. In terms of profitability, SBR.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to KUYA.CN's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SBR.TO is less volatile compared to KUYA.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBR.TO.
SBR.TO vs MSV.TO Comparison
SBR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBR.TO stands at 33.92M. In comparison, MSV.TO has a market cap of 13.43M. Regarding current trading prices, SBR.TO is priced at $0.05, while MSV.TO trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.50, whereas MSV.TO's P/E ratio is -7.33. In terms of profitability, SBR.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to MSV.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SBR.TO and MSV.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SBR.TO vs HAMR.CN Comparison
SBR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBR.TO stands at 33.92M. In comparison, HAMR.CN has a market cap of 3.34M. Regarding current trading prices, SBR.TO is priced at $0.05, while HAMR.CN trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.50, whereas HAMR.CN's P/E ratio is -2.75. In terms of profitability, SBR.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to HAMR.CN's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SBR.TO and HAMR.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SBR.TO vs KTRI.V Comparison
SBR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBR.TO stands at 33.92M. In comparison, KTRI.V has a market cap of 1.91M. Regarding current trading prices, SBR.TO is priced at $0.05, while KTRI.V trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.50, whereas KTRI.V's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, SBR.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to KTRI.V's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SBR.TO is less volatile compared to KTRI.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SBR.TO.
SBR.TO vs CSS.CN Comparison
SBR.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SBR.TO stands at 33.92M. In comparison, CSS.CN has a market cap of 1.04M. Regarding current trading prices, SBR.TO is priced at $0.05, while CSS.CN trades at $0.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SBR.TO currently has a P/E ratio of -2.50, whereas CSS.CN's P/E ratio is -0.25. In terms of profitability, SBR.TO's ROE is +0.33%, compared to CSS.CN's ROE of -1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SBR.TO and CSS.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).