First Majestic Silver Corp.
First Majestic Silver Corp. (AG.TO) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (AG.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Silver Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AG.TO | CA$28.07 | -9.83% | 13.9B | 34.65 | CA$0.81 | +0.11% |
| PAAS.TO | CA$77.61 | -7.52% | 32.7B | 17.88 | CA$4.34 | +0.96% |
| DSV.TO | CA$9.29 | -5.78% | 7.5B | 25.11 | CA$0.37 | N/A |
| SVM.TO | CA$18.66 | -8.93% | 4.1B | -155.50 | -CA$0.12 | +0.18% |
| EDR.TO | CA$13.49 | -8.85% | 4B | -168.62 | -CA$0.08 | N/A |
| AYA.TO | CA$26.47 | -9.84% | 3.8B | 60.16 | CA$0.44 | N/A |
| MAG.TO | CA$34.38 | +2.90% | 3.6B | 25.28 | CA$1.36 | +1.39% |
| FR.TO | CA$8.27 | +3.25% | 2.4B | -37.59 | -CA$0.22 | +0.11% |
| APM.TO | CA$7.66 | -4.13% | 1.1B | 7.16 | CA$1.07 | N/A |
| HSLV.TO | CA$7.64 | -9.16% | 779.4M | -54.57 | -CA$0.14 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
AG.TO vs PAAS.TO Comparison May 2026
AG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AG.TO stands at 13.9B. In comparison, PAAS.TO has a market cap of 32.7B. Regarding current trading prices, AG.TO is priced at CA$28.07, while PAAS.TO trades at CA$77.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 34.65, whereas PAAS.TO's P/E ratio is 17.88. In terms of profitability, AG.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to PAAS.TO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AG.TO is more volatile compared to PAAS.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AG.TO.Check PAAS.TO's competition here
AG.TO vs DSV.TO Comparison May 2026
AG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AG.TO stands at 13.9B. In comparison, DSV.TO has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, AG.TO is priced at CA$28.07, while DSV.TO trades at CA$9.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 34.65, whereas DSV.TO's P/E ratio is 25.11. In terms of profitability, AG.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to DSV.TO's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, AG.TO is more volatile compared to DSV.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AG.TO.Check DSV.TO's competition here
AG.TO vs SVM.TO Comparison May 2026
AG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AG.TO stands at 13.9B. In comparison, SVM.TO has a market cap of 4.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AG.TO is priced at CA$28.07, while SVM.TO trades at CA$18.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 34.65, whereas SVM.TO's P/E ratio is -155.50. In terms of profitability, AG.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SVM.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AG.TO is more volatile compared to SVM.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AG.TO.Check SVM.TO's competition here
AG.TO vs EDR.TO Comparison May 2026
AG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AG.TO stands at 13.9B. In comparison, EDR.TO has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, AG.TO is priced at CA$28.07, while EDR.TO trades at CA$13.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 34.65, whereas EDR.TO's P/E ratio is -168.62. In terms of profitability, AG.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to EDR.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, AG.TO is more volatile compared to EDR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AG.TO.Check EDR.TO's competition here
AG.TO vs AYA.TO Comparison May 2026
AG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AG.TO stands at 13.9B. In comparison, AYA.TO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, AG.TO is priced at CA$28.07, while AYA.TO trades at CA$26.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 34.65, whereas AYA.TO's P/E ratio is 60.16. In terms of profitability, AG.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AYA.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AG.TO is less volatile compared to AYA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AG.TO.Check AYA.TO's competition here
AG.TO vs MAG.TO Comparison May 2026
AG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AG.TO stands at 13.9B. In comparison, MAG.TO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, AG.TO is priced at CA$28.07, while MAG.TO trades at CA$34.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 34.65, whereas MAG.TO's P/E ratio is 25.28. In terms of profitability, AG.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MAG.TO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, AG.TO is more volatile compared to MAG.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AG.TO.Check MAG.TO's competition here
AG.TO vs FR.TO Comparison May 2026
AG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AG.TO stands at 13.9B. In comparison, FR.TO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, AG.TO is priced at CA$28.07, while FR.TO trades at CA$8.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 34.65, whereas FR.TO's P/E ratio is -37.59. In terms of profitability, AG.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to FR.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, AG.TO is more volatile compared to FR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AG.TO.Check FR.TO's competition here
AG.TO vs APM.TO Comparison May 2026
AG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AG.TO stands at 13.9B. In comparison, APM.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, AG.TO is priced at CA$28.07, while APM.TO trades at CA$7.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 34.65, whereas APM.TO's P/E ratio is 7.16. In terms of profitability, AG.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to APM.TO's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, AG.TO is less volatile compared to APM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AG.TO.Check APM.TO's competition here
AG.TO vs HSLV.TO Comparison May 2026
AG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AG.TO stands at 13.9B. In comparison, HSLV.TO has a market cap of 779.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AG.TO is priced at CA$28.07, while HSLV.TO trades at CA$7.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 34.65, whereas HSLV.TO's P/E ratio is -54.57. In terms of profitability, AG.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HSLV.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, AG.TO is less volatile compared to HSLV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AG.TO.Check HSLV.TO's competition here
AG.TO vs SVRS.V Comparison May 2026
AG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AG.TO stands at 13.9B. In comparison, SVRS.V has a market cap of 438.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AG.TO is priced at CA$28.07, while SVRS.V trades at CA$0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 34.65, whereas SVRS.V's P/E ratio is -19.33. In terms of profitability, AG.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SVRS.V's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, AG.TO is less volatile compared to SVRS.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AG.TO.Check SVRS.V's competition here
AG.TO vs AGMR.TO Comparison May 2026
AG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AG.TO stands at 13.9B. In comparison, AGMR.TO has a market cap of 245.3M. Regarding current trading prices, AG.TO is priced at CA$28.07, while AGMR.TO trades at CA$4.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 34.65, whereas AGMR.TO's P/E ratio is -2.94. In terms of profitability, AG.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AGMR.TO's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, AG.TO is more volatile compared to AGMR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AG.TO.Check AGMR.TO's competition here
AG.TO vs BIG.V Comparison May 2026
AG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AG.TO stands at 13.9B. In comparison, BIG.V has a market cap of 182.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AG.TO is priced at CA$28.07, while BIG.V trades at CA$0.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 34.65, whereas BIG.V's P/E ratio is -7.87. In terms of profitability, AG.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BIG.V's ROE of -1.56%. Regarding short-term risk, AG.TO is more volatile compared to BIG.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AG.TO.Check BIG.V's competition here
AG.TO vs KUYA.CN Comparison May 2026
AG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AG.TO stands at 13.9B. In comparison, KUYA.CN has a market cap of 128.6M. Regarding current trading prices, AG.TO is priced at CA$28.07, while KUYA.CN trades at CA$0.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 34.65, whereas KUYA.CN's P/E ratio is -24.75. In terms of profitability, AG.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KUYA.CN's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, AG.TO is more volatile compared to KUYA.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AG.TO.Check KUYA.CN's competition here
AG.TO vs BNKR.CN Comparison May 2026
AG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AG.TO stands at 13.9B. In comparison, BNKR.CN has a market cap of 44.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AG.TO is priced at CA$28.07, while BNKR.CN trades at CA$0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 34.65, whereas BNKR.CN's P/E ratio is -0.93. In terms of profitability, AG.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BNKR.CN's ROE of -0.32%. Regarding short-term risk, AG.TO is less volatile compared to BNKR.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AG.TO.Check BNKR.CN's competition here
AG.TO vs SBR.TO Comparison May 2026
AG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AG.TO stands at 13.9B. In comparison, SBR.TO has a market cap of 33.9M. Regarding current trading prices, AG.TO is priced at CA$28.07, while SBR.TO trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 34.65, whereas SBR.TO's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, AG.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to SBR.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, AG.TO is more volatile compared to SBR.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AG.TO.Check SBR.TO's competition here
AG.TO vs MSV.TO Comparison May 2026
AG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AG.TO stands at 13.9B. In comparison, MSV.TO has a market cap of 28M. Regarding current trading prices, AG.TO is priced at CA$28.07, while MSV.TO trades at CA$0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 34.65, whereas MSV.TO's P/E ratio is 2.84. In terms of profitability, AG.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to MSV.TO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, AG.TO is less volatile compared to MSV.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AG.TO.Check MSV.TO's competition here
AG.TO vs AMCO.V Comparison May 2026
AG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AG.TO stands at 13.9B. In comparison, AMCO.V has a market cap of 9M. Regarding current trading prices, AG.TO is priced at CA$28.07, while AMCO.V trades at CA$0.46.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 34.65, whereas AMCO.V's P/E ratio is -6.86. In terms of profitability, AG.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AMCO.V's ROE of -1.62%. Regarding short-term risk, AG.TO is less volatile compared to AMCO.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AG.TO.Check AMCO.V's competition here
AG.TO vs CSS.CN Comparison May 2026
AG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AG.TO stands at 13.9B. In comparison, CSS.CN has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, AG.TO is priced at CA$28.07, while CSS.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 34.65, whereas CSS.CN's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, AG.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to CSS.CN's ROE of -2.85%. Regarding short-term risk, AG.TO is more volatile compared to CSS.CN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AG.TO.Check CSS.CN's competition here
AG.TO vs KTRI.V Comparison May 2026
AG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AG.TO stands at 13.9B. In comparison, KTRI.V has a market cap of 4.8M. Regarding current trading prices, AG.TO is priced at CA$28.07, while KTRI.V trades at CA$0.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 34.65, whereas KTRI.V's P/E ratio is -11.00. In terms of profitability, AG.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to KTRI.V's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, AG.TO is more volatile compared to KTRI.V. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AG.TO.Check KTRI.V's competition here
AG.TO vs HAMR.CN Comparison May 2026
AG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AG.TO stands at 13.9B. In comparison, HAMR.CN has a market cap of 4.7M. Regarding current trading prices, AG.TO is priced at CA$28.07, while HAMR.CN trades at CA$0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 34.65, whereas HAMR.CN's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, AG.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to HAMR.CN's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, AG.TO is less volatile compared to HAMR.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AG.TO.Check HAMR.CN's competition here
AG.TO vs AUMN.TO Comparison May 2026
AG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AG.TO stands at 13.9B. In comparison, AUMN.TO has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, AG.TO is priced at CA$28.07, while AUMN.TO trades at CA$0.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 34.65, whereas AUMN.TO's P/E ratio is -0.73. In terms of profitability, AG.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to AUMN.TO's ROE of -0.95%. Regarding short-term risk, AG.TO is more volatile compared to AUMN.TO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AG.TO.Check AUMN.TO's competition here
AG.TO vs BNKR.V Comparison May 2026
AG.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, AG.TO stands at 13.9B. In comparison, BNKR.V has a market cap of 129.9K. Regarding current trading prices, AG.TO is priced at CA$28.07, while BNKR.V trades at CA$5.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
AG.TO currently has a P/E ratio of 34.65, whereas BNKR.V's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, AG.TO's ROE is +0.11%, compared to BNKR.V's ROE of +4.15%. Regarding short-term risk, AG.TO is less volatile compared to BNKR.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for AG.TO.Check BNKR.V's competition here