Bunker Hill Mining Corp. (CNQ: BNKR.CN) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See BNKR.CN's competitors and their performance on the CNQ and across the wider stock market.
Peer Comparison Table: Silver Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more for BNKR.CN and its CNQ peers.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BNKR.CN | CA$0.14 | +3.70% | 44.4M | -0.93 | -CA$0.15 | N/A |
| AG.TO | CA$29.07 | -0.48% | 14.3B | 23.59 | CA$1.23 | +0.22% |
| DSV.TO | CA$11.87 | -1.49% | 9.6B | 26.42 | CA$0.45 | N/A |
| AYA.TO | CA$36.66 | -1.16% | 5.3B | 34.29 | CA$1.07 | N/A |
| EDR.TO | CA$14.62 | -3.37% | 4.3B | 55.21 | CA$0.26 | N/A |
| SVM.TO | CA$17.25 | -0.98% | 3.8B | 47.91 | CA$0.36 | +0.20% |
| MAG.TO | CA$34.38 | +2.90% | 3.6B | 25.28 | CA$1.36 | +0.58% |
| FR.TO | CA$8.27 | +3.25% | 2.4B | -37.59 | -CA$0.22 | +0.77% |
| NUAG.TO | CA$9.11 | -3.70% | 1.7B | -256.76 | -CA$0.04 | N/A |
| APM.TO | CA$7.31 | -0.81% | 1.1B | 6.61 | CA$1.11 | N/A |
Stock Comparison
First Majestic Silver Corp. (TSX: AG.TO)
BNKR.CN vs AG.TO Comparison August 2026
Bunker Hill Mining Corp. (CNQ: BNKR.CN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNKR.CN stands at 44.4M. In comparison, AG.TO has a market cap of 14.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BNKR.CN is priced at CA$0.14 on the CNQ, while AG.TO trades at CA$29.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNKR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas AG.TO's P/E ratio is 23.59. In terms of profitability, BNKR.CN's ROE is +13.50%, compared to AG.TO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BNKR.CN is more volatile compared to AG.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNKR.CN.Check AG.TO's competition here
Discovery Silver Corp. (TSX: DSV.TO)
BNKR.CN vs DSV.TO Comparison August 2026
Bunker Hill Mining Corp. (CNQ: BNKR.CN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNKR.CN stands at 44.4M. In comparison, DSV.TO has a market cap of 9.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BNKR.CN is priced at CA$0.14 on the CNQ, while DSV.TO trades at CA$11.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNKR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas DSV.TO's P/E ratio is 26.42. In terms of profitability, BNKR.CN's ROE is +13.50%, compared to DSV.TO's ROE of +0.43%. Regarding short-term risk, BNKR.CN is more volatile compared to DSV.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNKR.CN.Check DSV.TO's competition here
Aya Gold & Silver Inc. (TSX: AYA.TO)
BNKR.CN vs AYA.TO Comparison August 2026
Bunker Hill Mining Corp. (CNQ: BNKR.CN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNKR.CN stands at 44.4M. In comparison, AYA.TO has a market cap of 5.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BNKR.CN is priced at CA$0.14 on the CNQ, while AYA.TO trades at CA$36.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNKR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas AYA.TO's P/E ratio is 34.29. In terms of profitability, BNKR.CN's ROE is +13.50%, compared to AYA.TO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, BNKR.CN is more volatile compared to AYA.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNKR.CN.Check AYA.TO's competition here
Endeavour Silver Corp. (TSX: EDR.TO)
BNKR.CN vs EDR.TO Comparison August 2026
Bunker Hill Mining Corp. (CNQ: BNKR.CN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNKR.CN stands at 44.4M. In comparison, EDR.TO has a market cap of 4.3B. Regarding current trading prices, BNKR.CN is priced at CA$0.14 on the CNQ, while EDR.TO trades at CA$14.62.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNKR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas EDR.TO's P/E ratio is 55.21. In terms of profitability, BNKR.CN's ROE is +13.50%, compared to EDR.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BNKR.CN is more volatile compared to EDR.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNKR.CN.Check EDR.TO's competition here
Silvercorp Metals Inc. (TSX: SVM.TO)
BNKR.CN vs SVM.TO Comparison August 2026
Bunker Hill Mining Corp. (CNQ: BNKR.CN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNKR.CN stands at 44.4M. In comparison, SVM.TO has a market cap of 3.8B. Regarding current trading prices, BNKR.CN is priced at CA$0.14 on the CNQ, while SVM.TO trades at CA$17.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNKR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas SVM.TO's P/E ratio is 47.91. In terms of profitability, BNKR.CN's ROE is +13.50%, compared to SVM.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, BNKR.CN is more volatile compared to SVM.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNKR.CN.Check SVM.TO's competition here
MAG Silver Corp. (TSX: MAG.TO)
BNKR.CN vs MAG.TO Comparison August 2026
Bunker Hill Mining Corp. (CNQ: BNKR.CN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNKR.CN stands at 44.4M. In comparison, MAG.TO has a market cap of 3.6B. Regarding current trading prices, BNKR.CN is priced at CA$0.14 on the CNQ, while MAG.TO trades at CA$34.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNKR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas MAG.TO's P/E ratio is 25.28. In terms of profitability, BNKR.CN's ROE is +13.50%, compared to MAG.TO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, BNKR.CN is more volatile compared to MAG.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNKR.CN.Check MAG.TO's competition here
First Majestic Silver Corp. (TSX: FR.TO)
BNKR.CN vs FR.TO Comparison August 2026
Bunker Hill Mining Corp. (CNQ: BNKR.CN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNKR.CN stands at 44.4M. In comparison, FR.TO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, BNKR.CN is priced at CA$0.14 on the CNQ, while FR.TO trades at CA$8.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNKR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas FR.TO's P/E ratio is -37.59. In terms of profitability, BNKR.CN's ROE is +13.50%, compared to FR.TO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, BNKR.CN is more volatile compared to FR.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNKR.CN.Check FR.TO's competition here
New Pacific Metals Corp. (TSX: NUAG.TO)
BNKR.CN vs NUAG.TO Comparison August 2026
Bunker Hill Mining Corp. (CNQ: BNKR.CN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNKR.CN stands at 44.4M. In comparison, NUAG.TO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, BNKR.CN is priced at CA$0.14 on the CNQ, while NUAG.TO trades at CA$9.11.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNKR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas NUAG.TO's P/E ratio is -256.76. In terms of profitability, BNKR.CN's ROE is +13.50%, compared to NUAG.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, BNKR.CN is less volatile compared to NUAG.TO. This indicates lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNKR.CN.Check NUAG.TO's competition here
Andean Precious Metals Corp. (TSX: APM.TO)
BNKR.CN vs APM.TO Comparison August 2026
Bunker Hill Mining Corp. (CNQ: BNKR.CN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNKR.CN stands at 44.4M. In comparison, APM.TO has a market cap of 1.1B. Regarding current trading prices, BNKR.CN is priced at CA$0.14 on the CNQ, while APM.TO trades at CA$7.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNKR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas APM.TO's P/E ratio is 6.61. In terms of profitability, BNKR.CN's ROE is +13.50%, compared to APM.TO's ROE of +0.44%. Regarding short-term risk, BNKR.CN is more volatile compared to APM.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNKR.CN.Check APM.TO's competition here
Highlander Silver Corp. (TSX: HSLV.TO)
BNKR.CN vs HSLV.TO Comparison August 2026
Bunker Hill Mining Corp. (CNQ: BNKR.CN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNKR.CN stands at 44.4M. In comparison, HSLV.TO has a market cap of 854.6M. Regarding current trading prices, BNKR.CN is priced at CA$0.14 on the CNQ, while HSLV.TO trades at CA$7.32.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNKR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas HSLV.TO's P/E ratio is 55.74. In terms of profitability, BNKR.CN's ROE is +13.50%, compared to HSLV.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, BNKR.CN is more volatile compared to HSLV.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNKR.CN.Check HSLV.TO's competition here
Silver Mountain Resources Inc. (TSX: AGMR.TO)
BNKR.CN vs AGMR.TO Comparison August 2026
Bunker Hill Mining Corp. (CNQ: BNKR.CN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNKR.CN stands at 44.4M. In comparison, AGMR.TO has a market cap of 248M. Regarding current trading prices, BNKR.CN is priced at CA$0.14 on the CNQ, while AGMR.TO trades at CA$3.96.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNKR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas AGMR.TO's P/E ratio is -3.10. In terms of profitability, BNKR.CN's ROE is +13.50%, compared to AGMR.TO's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, BNKR.CN is more volatile compared to AGMR.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNKR.CN.Check AGMR.TO's competition here
Kuya Silver Corporation (CNQ: KUYA.CN)
BNKR.CN vs KUYA.CN Comparison August 2026
Bunker Hill Mining Corp. (CNQ: BNKR.CN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNKR.CN stands at 44.4M. In comparison, KUYA.CN has a market cap of 107.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BNKR.CN is priced at CA$0.14 on the CNQ, while KUYA.CN trades at CA$0.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNKR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas KUYA.CN's P/E ratio is -14.32. In terms of profitability, BNKR.CN's ROE is +13.50%, compared to KUYA.CN's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BNKR.CN is more volatile compared to KUYA.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNKR.CN.Check KUYA.CN's competition here
Minco Silver Corporation (TSX: MSV.TO)
BNKR.CN vs MSV.TO Comparison August 2026
Bunker Hill Mining Corp. (CNQ: BNKR.CN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNKR.CN stands at 44.4M. In comparison, MSV.TO has a market cap of 50.5M. Regarding current trading prices, BNKR.CN is priced at CA$0.14 on the CNQ, while MSV.TO trades at CA$0.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNKR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas MSV.TO's P/E ratio is 7.12. In terms of profitability, BNKR.CN's ROE is +13.50%, compared to MSV.TO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, BNKR.CN is more volatile compared to MSV.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNKR.CN.Check MSV.TO's competition here
Silver Bear Resources Plc (TSX: SBR.TO)
BNKR.CN vs SBR.TO Comparison August 2026
Bunker Hill Mining Corp. (CNQ: BNKR.CN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNKR.CN stands at 44.4M. In comparison, SBR.TO has a market cap of 33.9M. Regarding current trading prices, BNKR.CN is priced at CA$0.14 on the CNQ, while SBR.TO trades at CA$0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNKR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas SBR.TO's P/E ratio is -3.17. In terms of profitability, BNKR.CN's ROE is +13.50%, compared to SBR.TO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, BNKR.CN is more volatile compared to SBR.TO. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNKR.CN.Check SBR.TO's competition here
Silver Hammer Mining Corp. (CNQ: HAMR.CN)
BNKR.CN vs HAMR.CN Comparison August 2026
Bunker Hill Mining Corp. (CNQ: BNKR.CN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNKR.CN stands at 44.4M. In comparison, HAMR.CN has a market cap of 6.1M. Regarding current trading prices, BNKR.CN is priced at CA$0.14 on the CNQ, while HAMR.CN trades at CA$0.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNKR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas HAMR.CN's P/E ratio is -2.83. In terms of profitability, BNKR.CN's ROE is +13.50%, compared to HAMR.CN's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BNKR.CN is more volatile compared to HAMR.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNKR.CN.Check HAMR.CN's competition here
Cascada Silver Corp. (CNQ: CSS.CN)
BNKR.CN vs CSS.CN Comparison August 2026
Bunker Hill Mining Corp. (CNQ: BNKR.CN) plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance on the CNQ reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, BNKR.CN stands at 44.4M. In comparison, CSS.CN has a market cap of 5.2M. Regarding current trading prices, BNKR.CN is priced at CA$0.14 on the CNQ, while CSS.CN trades at CA$0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
BNKR.CN currently has a P/E ratio of -0.93, whereas CSS.CN's P/E ratio is -2.50. In terms of profitability, BNKR.CN's ROE is +13.50%, compared to CSS.CN's ROE of -3.12%. Regarding short-term risk, BNKR.CN is more volatile compared to CSS.CN. This indicates higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for BNKR.CN.Check CSS.CN's competition here