St. Augustine Gold and Copper Limited
St. Augustine Gold and Copper Limited SAU.TO Peers
See (SAU.TO) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Industrial Materials Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAU.TO | $0.07 | N/A | 65.74M | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| TECK-B.TO | $49.86 | -2.18% | 25.35B | 712.29 | $0.07 | +2.00% |
| TECK-A.TO | $49.00 | -4.39% | 23.86B | 700.00 | $0.07 | +1.02% |
| IVN.TO | $13.81 | -3.09% | 18.68B | 30.69 | $0.45 | N/A |
| AKE.TO | $8.86 | -0.56% | 5.68B | 9.53 | $0.93 | N/A |
| FIL.TO | $32.25 | -1.01% | 4.37B | -31.01 | -$1.04 | N/A |
| NGEX.TO | $12.02 | +0.17% | 2.49B | -30.82 | -$0.39 | N/A |
| SKE.TO | $17.33 | +2.00% | 1.96B | -11.33 | -$1.53 | N/A |
| FOM.TO | $3.07 | -0.32% | 1.31B | -61.40 | -$0.05 | N/A |
| ALS.TO | $26.58 | -0.89% | 1.23B | 12.54 | $2.12 | +1.35% |
Stock Comparison
SAU.TO vs TECK-B.TO Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, TECK-B.TO has a market cap of 25.35B. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while TECK-B.TO trades at $49.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TECK-B.TO's P/E ratio is 712.29. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TECK-B.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to TECK-B.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs TECK-A.TO Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, TECK-A.TO has a market cap of 23.86B. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while TECK-A.TO trades at $49.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TECK-A.TO's P/E ratio is 700.00. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TECK-A.TO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to TECK-A.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs IVN.TO Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, IVN.TO has a market cap of 18.68B. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while IVN.TO trades at $13.81.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IVN.TO's P/E ratio is 30.69. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to IVN.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to IVN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs AKE.TO Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, AKE.TO has a market cap of 5.68B. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while AKE.TO trades at $8.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AKE.TO's P/E ratio is 9.53. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AKE.TO's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to AKE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs FIL.TO Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, FIL.TO has a market cap of 4.37B. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while FIL.TO trades at $32.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FIL.TO's P/E ratio is -31.01. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FIL.TO's ROE of -1.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to FIL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs NGEX.TO Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, NGEX.TO has a market cap of 2.49B. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while NGEX.TO trades at $12.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NGEX.TO's P/E ratio is -30.82. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NGEX.TO's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to NGEX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs SKE.TO Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, SKE.TO has a market cap of 1.96B. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while SKE.TO trades at $17.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SKE.TO's P/E ratio is -11.33. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SKE.TO's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to SKE.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs FOM.TO Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, FOM.TO has a market cap of 1.31B. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while FOM.TO trades at $3.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FOM.TO's P/E ratio is -61.40. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FOM.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to FOM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs ALS.TO Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, ALS.TO has a market cap of 1.23B. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while ALS.TO trades at $26.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ALS.TO's P/E ratio is 12.54. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ALS.TO's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to ALS.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs VZLA.TO Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, VZLA.TO has a market cap of 971.46M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while VZLA.TO trades at $3.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VZLA.TO's P/E ratio is -111.67. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to VZLA.TO's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to VZLA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs LAC.TO Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, LAC.TO has a market cap of 862.36M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while LAC.TO trades at $3.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LAC.TO's P/E ratio is -13.59. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LAC.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to LAC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs AII.TO Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, AII.TO has a market cap of 686.22M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while AII.TO trades at $2.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AII.TO's P/E ratio is -40.00. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AII.TO's ROE of -0.38%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to AII.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs NDM.TO Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, NDM.TO has a market cap of 684.00M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while NDM.TO trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NDM.TO's P/E ratio is -9.07. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NDM.TO's ROE of -0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to NDM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs MDI.TO Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, MDI.TO has a market cap of 675.22M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while MDI.TO trades at $8.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MDI.TO's P/E ratio is 20.12. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MDI.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to MDI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs LAAC.TO Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, LAAC.TO has a market cap of 633.14M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while LAAC.TO trades at $3.91.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LAAC.TO's P/E ratio is -39.10. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LAAC.TO's ROE of +1.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to LAAC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs POM.TO Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, POM.TO has a market cap of 552.27M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while POM.TO trades at $2.84.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas POM.TO's P/E ratio is -10.52. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to POM.TO's ROE of -0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to POM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs USA.TO Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, USA.TO has a market cap of 521.89M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while USA.TO trades at $0.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas USA.TO's P/E ratio is -4.44. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to USA.TO's ROE of -1.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to USA.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs FVL.TO Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, FVL.TO has a market cap of 502.01M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while FVL.TO trades at $0.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FVL.TO's P/E ratio is -95.00. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FVL.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to FVL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs ETG.TO Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, ETG.TO has a market cap of 468.73M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while ETG.TO trades at $2.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ETG.TO's P/E ratio is -32.29. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ETG.TO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to ETG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs SOLG.TO Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, SOLG.TO has a market cap of 405.15M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while SOLG.TO trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SOLG.TO's P/E ratio is -4.50. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SOLG.TO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to SOLG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs PMET.TO Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, PMET.TO has a market cap of 352.01M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while PMET.TO trades at $2.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PMET.TO's P/E ratio is -56.00. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PMET.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to PMET.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs ERD.TO Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, ERD.TO has a market cap of 337.62M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while ERD.TO trades at $0.93.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ERD.TO's P/E ratio is -46.50. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ERD.TO's ROE of -0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to ERD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs LUCA.V Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, LUCA.V has a market cap of 331.04M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while LUCA.V trades at $1.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LUCA.V's P/E ratio is -15.50. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LUCA.V's ROE of -0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to LUCA.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs LIRC.TO Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, LIRC.TO has a market cap of 301.14M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while LIRC.TO trades at $5.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LIRC.TO's P/E ratio is -79.71. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LIRC.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to LIRC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs WRN.TO Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, WRN.TO has a market cap of 294.00M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while WRN.TO trades at $1.47.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WRN.TO's P/E ratio is -36.75. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to WRN.TO's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to WRN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs LIFT.CN Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, LIFT.CN has a market cap of 275.99M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while LIFT.CN trades at $7.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LIFT.CN's P/E ratio is 50.00. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LIFT.CN's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to LIFT.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs ECOR.TO Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, ECOR.TO has a market cap of 270.77M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while ECOR.TO trades at $1.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ECOR.TO's P/E ratio is -21.80. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ECOR.TO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to ECOR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs TMQ.TO Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, TMQ.TO has a market cap of 269.31M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while TMQ.TO trades at $1.64.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TMQ.TO's P/E ratio is -23.43. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TMQ.TO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to TMQ.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs GLO.TO Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, GLO.TO has a market cap of 261.86M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while GLO.TO trades at $0.85.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GLO.TO's P/E ratio is 21.25. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GLO.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to GLO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs SMT.TO Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, SMT.TO has a market cap of 243.90M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while SMT.TO trades at $1.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SMT.TO's P/E ratio is 7.67. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SMT.TO's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to SMT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs MNO.TO Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, MNO.TO has a market cap of 238.68M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while MNO.TO trades at $0.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MNO.TO's P/E ratio is -8.50. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MNO.TO's ROE of -1.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to MNO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs TLG.TO Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, TLG.TO has a market cap of 229.68M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while TLG.TO trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLG.TO's P/E ratio is -7.50. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TLG.TO's ROE of -0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to TLG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs PRYM.TO Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, PRYM.TO has a market cap of 189.89M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while PRYM.TO trades at $1.27.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PRYM.TO's P/E ratio is -8.47. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PRYM.TO's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to PRYM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs FAR.TO Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, FAR.TO has a market cap of 185.54M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while FAR.TO trades at $1.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FAR.TO's P/E ratio is 6.48. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FAR.TO's ROE of +0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to FAR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs GEO.TO Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, GEO.TO has a market cap of 172.62M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while GEO.TO trades at $3.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GEO.TO's P/E ratio is 9.63. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GEO.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to GEO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs LAM.TO Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, LAM.TO has a market cap of 160.00M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while LAM.TO trades at $0.61.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LAM.TO's P/E ratio is -20.33. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LAM.TO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to LAM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs IBAT.CN Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, IBAT.CN has a market cap of 156.54M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while IBAT.CN trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas IBAT.CN's P/E ratio is -7.14. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to IBAT.CN's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO and IBAT.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SAU.TO vs AMC.TO Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, AMC.TO has a market cap of 154.43M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while AMC.TO trades at $1.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMC.TO's P/E ratio is -5.38. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AMC.TO's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to AMC.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs ARA.TO Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, ARA.TO has a market cap of 142.99M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while ARA.TO trades at $0.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARA.TO's P/E ratio is -10.83. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ARA.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO and ARA.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SAU.TO vs TLO.TO Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, TLO.TO has a market cap of 140.21M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while TLO.TO trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TLO.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TLO.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to TLO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs CDPR.CN Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, CDPR.CN has a market cap of 125.81M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while CDPR.CN trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas CDPR.CN's P/E ratio is -1.59. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to CDPR.CN's ROE of -1.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to CDPR.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs AOT.TO Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, AOT.TO has a market cap of 125.77M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while AOT.TO trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AOT.TO's P/E ratio is -2.00. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AOT.TO's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to AOT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs NB.TO Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, NB.TO has a market cap of 124.35M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while NB.TO trades at $3.43.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NB.TO's P/E ratio is -1.94. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NB.TO's ROE of +2.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to NB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs LGO.TO Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, LGO.TO has a market cap of 114.12M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while LGO.TO trades at $1.78.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LGO.TO's P/E ratio is -1.65. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LGO.TO's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to LGO.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs MOLY.NE Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, MOLY.NE has a market cap of 104.09M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while MOLY.NE trades at $0.87.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MOLY.NE's P/E ratio is -21.75. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MOLY.NE's ROE of -1.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to MOLY.NE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs FSY.TO Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, FSY.TO has a market cap of 103.23M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while FSY.TO trades at $0.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FSY.TO's P/E ratio is -49.00. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FSY.TO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to FSY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs TI.TO Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, TI.TO has a market cap of 80.46M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while TI.TO trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TI.TO's P/E ratio is 8.43. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TI.TO's ROE of -1.97%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to TI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs FURY.TO Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, FURY.TO has a market cap of 80.17M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while FURY.TO trades at $0.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FURY.TO's P/E ratio is -0.68. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FURY.TO's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to FURY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs GMX.TO Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, GMX.TO has a market cap of 74.61M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while GMX.TO trades at $1.33.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GMX.TO's P/E ratio is 66.50. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GMX.TO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to GMX.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs SLR.TO Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, SLR.TO has a market cap of 74.40M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while SLR.TO trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLR.TO's P/E ratio is -9.00. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SLR.TO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to SLR.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs S.TO Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, S.TO has a market cap of 71.78M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while S.TO trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas S.TO's P/E ratio is -0.83. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to S.TO's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to S.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs NVLH.CN Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, NVLH.CN has a market cap of 62.26M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while NVLH.CN trades at $0.24.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NVLH.CN's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NVLH.CN's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO and NVLH.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SAU.TO vs WM.TO Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, WM.TO has a market cap of 54.99M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while WM.TO trades at $0.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WM.TO's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to WM.TO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to WM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs TSK.TO Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, TSK.TO has a market cap of 54.90M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while TSK.TO trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TSK.TO's P/E ratio is -3.20. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TSK.TO's ROE of -4.13%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to TSK.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs OGD.TO Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, OGD.TO has a market cap of 48.12M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while OGD.TO trades at $1.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas OGD.TO's P/E ratio is 9.21. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to OGD.TO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to OGD.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs VROY.V Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, VROY.V has a market cap of 46.06M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while VROY.V trades at $2.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VROY.V's P/E ratio is -34.33. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to VROY.V's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to VROY.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs BKI.TO Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, BKI.TO has a market cap of 44.28M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while BKI.TO trades at $0.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas BKI.TO's P/E ratio is -13.00. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to BKI.TO's ROE of +1.99%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to BKI.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs MIN.TO Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, MIN.TO has a market cap of 44.16M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while MIN.TO trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MIN.TO's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MIN.TO's ROE of +1.31%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO and MIN.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SAU.TO vs GENM.TO Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, GENM.TO has a market cap of 43.84M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while GENM.TO trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GENM.TO's P/E ratio is -2.06. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GENM.TO's ROE of +0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to GENM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs FOX.CN Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, FOX.CN has a market cap of 42.58M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while FOX.CN trades at $0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FOX.CN's P/E ratio is -29.50. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FOX.CN's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to FOX.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs RUA.V Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, RUA.V has a market cap of 41.51M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while RUA.V trades at $0.69.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RUA.V's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RUA.V's ROE of -0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to RUA.V. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs RUA.CN Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, RUA.CN has a market cap of 40.46M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while RUA.CN trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RUA.CN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RUA.CN's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to RUA.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs VALU.CN Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, VALU.CN has a market cap of 39.24M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while VALU.CN trades at $0.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VALU.CN's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to VALU.CN's ROE of +10.59%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO and VALU.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SAU.TO vs ARS.CN Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, ARS.CN has a market cap of 37.86M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while ARS.CN trades at $0.21.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ARS.CN's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ARS.CN's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to ARS.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs TOC.CN Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, TOC.CN has a market cap of 37.45M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while TOC.CN trades at $0.66.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TOC.CN's P/E ratio is -22.00. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TOC.CN's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to TOC.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs NCF.TO Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, NCF.TO has a market cap of 36.42M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while NCF.TO trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NCF.TO's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NCF.TO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO and NCF.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SAU.TO vs FT.TO Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, FT.TO has a market cap of 34.33M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while FT.TO trades at $0.07.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas FT.TO's P/E ratio is -6.50. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to FT.TO's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO and FT.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SAU.TO vs RTG.TO Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, RTG.TO has a market cap of 33.86M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while RTG.TO trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas RTG.TO's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to RTG.TO's ROE of -1.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to RTG.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs NEXT.TO Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, NEXT.TO has a market cap of 33.28M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while NEXT.TO trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NEXT.TO's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NEXT.TO's ROE of -0.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to NEXT.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs NICO.CN Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, NICO.CN has a market cap of 31.27M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while NICO.CN trades at $0.17.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NICO.CN's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NICO.CN's ROE of +1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to NICO.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs EGFV.CN Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, EGFV.CN has a market cap of 27.30M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while EGFV.CN trades at $2.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EGFV.CN's P/E ratio is -100.00. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to EGFV.CN's ROE of +0.14%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO and EGFV.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SAU.TO vs AMPS.CN Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, AMPS.CN has a market cap of 26.85M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while AMPS.CN trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AMPS.CN's P/E ratio is -5.90. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AMPS.CN's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO and AMPS.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SAU.TO vs AAN.V Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, AAN.V has a market cap of 22.30M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while AAN.V trades at $0.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AAN.V's P/E ratio is -2.19. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AAN.V's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO and AAN.V have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SAU.TO vs URNM.CN Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, URNM.CN has a market cap of 19.36M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while URNM.CN trades at $0.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas URNM.CN's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to URNM.CN's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO and URNM.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SAU.TO vs EXN.TO Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, EXN.TO has a market cap of 18.47M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while EXN.TO trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas EXN.TO's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to EXN.TO's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to EXN.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs AVL.TO Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, AVL.TO has a market cap of 18.45M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while AVL.TO trades at $0.03.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas AVL.TO's P/E ratio is -3.00. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to AVL.TO's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to AVL.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs LVL.CN Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, LVL.CN has a market cap of 18.44M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while LVL.CN trades at $0.60.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LVL.CN's P/E ratio is -12.00. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LVL.CN's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, Volatility data is not available for a full comparison. SAU.TO has daily volatility of 0.00 and LVL.CN has daily volatility of N/A.
SAU.TO vs SX.CN Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, SX.CN has a market cap of 18.37M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while SX.CN trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SX.CN's P/E ratio is 2.00. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SX.CN's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to SX.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs TN.CN Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, TN.CN has a market cap of 18.34M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while TN.CN trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TN.CN's P/E ratio is -7.00. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TN.CN's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to TN.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs VOY.CN Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, VOY.CN has a market cap of 18.22M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while VOY.CN trades at $0.56.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas VOY.CN's P/E ratio is -56.00. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to VOY.CN's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO and VOY.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SAU.TO vs ASND.TO Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, ASND.TO has a market cap of 17.41M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while ASND.TO trades at $0.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ASND.TO's P/E ratio is -1.87. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ASND.TO's ROE of +0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to ASND.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs SAM.TO Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, SAM.TO has a market cap of 16.72M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while SAM.TO trades at $0.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SAM.TO's P/E ratio is -6.25. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SAM.TO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to SAM.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs WRX.TO Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, WRX.TO has a market cap of 16.36M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while WRX.TO trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas WRX.TO's P/E ratio is 4.00. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to WRX.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO and WRX.TO have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SAU.TO vs SUPR.CN Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, SUPR.CN has a market cap of 15.04M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while SUPR.CN trades at $0.48.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SUPR.CN's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SUPR.CN's ROE of -116.77%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to SUPR.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs TICO.CN Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, TICO.CN has a market cap of 14.98M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while TICO.CN trades at $0.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TICO.CN's P/E ratio is -75.00. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TICO.CN's ROE of +0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO and TICO.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SAU.TO vs SLV.CN Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, SLV.CN has a market cap of 14.89M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while SLV.CN trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SLV.CN's P/E ratio is -26.00. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SLV.CN's ROE of -0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to SLV.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs COSA.CN Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, COSA.CN has a market cap of 14.25M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while COSA.CN trades at $0.31.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas COSA.CN's P/E ratio is -7.75. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to COSA.CN's ROE of -0.59%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to COSA.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs TTX.CN Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, TTX.CN has a market cap of 13.18M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while TTX.CN trades at $0.02.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas TTX.CN's P/E ratio is -0.75. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to TTX.CN's ROE of +0.40%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO and TTX.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SAU.TO vs MAXX.CN Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, MAXX.CN has a market cap of 12.85M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while MAXX.CN trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas MAXX.CN's P/E ratio is -1.02. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to MAXX.CN's ROE of -0.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to MAXX.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs SCY.TO Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, SCY.TO has a market cap of 12.46M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while SCY.TO trades at $0.04.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SCY.TO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SCY.TO's ROE of -0.29%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to SCY.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs PM.CN Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, PM.CN has a market cap of 11.64M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while PM.CN trades at $0.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PM.CN's P/E ratio is -0.58. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PM.CN's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO and PM.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SAU.TO vs PEK.CN Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, PEK.CN has a market cap of 11.32M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while PEK.CN trades at $0.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PEK.CN's P/E ratio is -17.25. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PEK.CN's ROE of -0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to PEK.CN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs NXU.CN Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, NXU.CN has a market cap of 10.76M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while NXU.CN trades at $0.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas NXU.CN's P/E ratio is -15.00. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to NXU.CN's ROE of -16.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO and NXU.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SAU.TO vs LIM.CN Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, LIM.CN has a market cap of 9.87M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while LIM.CN trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas LIM.CN's P/E ratio is 1.50. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to LIM.CN's ROE of -0.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO and LIM.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SAU.TO vs GAMA.CN Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, GAMA.CN has a market cap of 9.21M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while GAMA.CN trades at $0.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GAMA.CN's P/E ratio is -1.88. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GAMA.CN's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO and GAMA.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SAU.TO vs GDIG.CN Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, GDIG.CN has a market cap of 9.16M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while GDIG.CN trades at $0.26.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas GDIG.CN's P/E ratio is -8.67. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to GDIG.CN's ROE of -0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO and GDIG.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).
SAU.TO vs ELEF.TO Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, ELEF.TO has a market cap of 9.13M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while ELEF.TO trades at $0.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas ELEF.TO's P/E ratio is -1.10. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to ELEF.TO's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to ELEF.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs SVB.TO Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, SVB.TO has a market cap of 8.76M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while SVB.TO trades at $0.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas SVB.TO's P/E ratio is -18.50. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to SVB.TO's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO is less volatile compared to SVB.TO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SAU.TO.
SAU.TO vs PSE.CN Comparison
SAU.TO plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SAU.TO stands at 65.74M. In comparison, PSE.CN has a market cap of 8.67M. Regarding current trading prices, SAU.TO is priced at $0.07, while PSE.CN trades at $0.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SAU.TO currently has a P/E ratio of N/A, whereas PSE.CN's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, SAU.TO's ROE is -0.01%, compared to PSE.CN's ROE of -18.62%. Regarding short-term risk, SAU.TO and PSE.CN have similar daily volatility (0.00).