Satia Industries Limited
Satia Industries Limited (SATIA.NS) Stock Competitors & Peer Comparison
See (SATIA.NS) competitors and their performances in Stock Market.
Peer Comparison Table: Paper, Lumber & Forest Products Industry
Detailed financial metrics including price, market cap, P/E ratio, and more.
| Symbol | Price | Change % | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | EPS | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SATIA.NS | ₹55.71 | +8.89% | 5.6B | 7.90 | ₹7.05 | +0.54% |
| CENTURYTEX.BO | ₹2,716.50 | +0.00% | 300B | 116.04 | ₹23.41 | +0.17% |
| CENTURYTEX.NS | ₹2,714.05 | +1.05% | 299.7B | 116.13 | ₹23.37 | N/A |
| CENTURYPLY.BO | ₹714.75 | +1.88% | 158.8B | 67.05 | ₹10.66 | +0.14% |
| ABREL.NS | ₹1,155.00 | +2.85% | 127.7B | -37.40 | -₹30.88 | +0.17% |
| JKPAPER.BO | ₹333.30 | +8.71% | 56.5B | 23.74 | ₹14.04 | +1.50% |
| JKPAPER.NS | ₹332.70 | +8.58% | 56.4B | 23.71 | ₹14.03 | +1.50% |
| WSTCSTPAPR.BO | ₹434.70 | +7.16% | 28.7B | 15.96 | ₹27.24 | +1.15% |
| WSTCSTPAPR.NS | ₹434.45 | +6.82% | 28.7B | 20.09 | ₹21.60 | +1.15% |
| GREENPLY.NS | ₹187.63 | +4.06% | 23.4B | 31.17 | ₹6.02 | +0.27% |
Stock Comparison
SATIA.NS vs CENTURYTEX.BO Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, CENTURYTEX.BO has a market cap of 300B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while CENTURYTEX.BO trades at ₹2,716.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas CENTURYTEX.BO's P/E ratio is 116.04. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CENTURYTEX.BO's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is more volatile compared to CENTURYTEX.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check CENTURYTEX.BO's competition here
SATIA.NS vs CENTURYTEX.NS Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, CENTURYTEX.NS has a market cap of 299.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while CENTURYTEX.NS trades at ₹2,714.05.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas CENTURYTEX.NS's P/E ratio is 116.13. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CENTURYTEX.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is more volatile compared to CENTURYTEX.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check CENTURYTEX.NS's competition here
SATIA.NS vs CENTURYPLY.BO Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, CENTURYPLY.BO has a market cap of 158.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while CENTURYPLY.BO trades at ₹714.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas CENTURYPLY.BO's P/E ratio is 67.05. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CENTURYPLY.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is more volatile compared to CENTURYPLY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check CENTURYPLY.BO's competition here
SATIA.NS vs ABREL.NS Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, ABREL.NS has a market cap of 127.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while ABREL.NS trades at ₹1,155.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas ABREL.NS's P/E ratio is -37.40. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ABREL.NS's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is more volatile compared to ABREL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check ABREL.NS's competition here
SATIA.NS vs JKPAPER.BO Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, JKPAPER.BO has a market cap of 56.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while JKPAPER.BO trades at ₹333.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas JKPAPER.BO's P/E ratio is 23.74. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JKPAPER.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is more volatile compared to JKPAPER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check JKPAPER.BO's competition here
SATIA.NS vs JKPAPER.NS Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, JKPAPER.NS has a market cap of 56.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while JKPAPER.NS trades at ₹332.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas JKPAPER.NS's P/E ratio is 23.71. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to JKPAPER.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is more volatile compared to JKPAPER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check JKPAPER.NS's competition here
SATIA.NS vs WSTCSTPAPR.BO Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, WSTCSTPAPR.BO has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while WSTCSTPAPR.BO trades at ₹434.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas WSTCSTPAPR.BO's P/E ratio is 15.96. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WSTCSTPAPR.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is more volatile compared to WSTCSTPAPR.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check WSTCSTPAPR.BO's competition here
SATIA.NS vs WSTCSTPAPR.NS Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, WSTCSTPAPR.NS has a market cap of 28.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while WSTCSTPAPR.NS trades at ₹434.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas WSTCSTPAPR.NS's P/E ratio is 20.09. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WSTCSTPAPR.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is more volatile compared to WSTCSTPAPR.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check WSTCSTPAPR.NS's competition here
SATIA.NS vs GREENPLY.NS Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, GREENPLY.NS has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while GREENPLY.NS trades at ₹187.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas GREENPLY.NS's P/E ratio is 31.17. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GREENPLY.NS's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is more volatile compared to GREENPLY.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check GREENPLY.NS's competition here
SATIA.NS vs GREENPLY.BO Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, GREENPLY.BO has a market cap of 23.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while GREENPLY.BO trades at ₹187.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas GREENPLY.BO's P/E ratio is 30.96. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GREENPLY.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is more volatile compared to GREENPLY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check GREENPLY.BO's competition here
SATIA.NS vs GREENPANEL.BO Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, GREENPANEL.BO has a market cap of 22B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while GREENPANEL.BO trades at ₹179.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas GREENPANEL.BO's P/E ratio is -1994.44. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GREENPANEL.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is more volatile compared to GREENPANEL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check GREENPANEL.BO's competition here
SATIA.NS vs SESHAPAPER.NS Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, SESHAPAPER.NS has a market cap of 16B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while SESHAPAPER.NS trades at ₹254.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas SESHAPAPER.NS's P/E ratio is 18.33. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SESHAPAPER.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is less volatile compared to SESHAPAPER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check SESHAPAPER.NS's competition here
SATIA.NS vs SESHAPAPER.BO Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, SESHAPAPER.BO has a market cap of 15.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while SESHAPAPER.BO trades at ₹252.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas SESHAPAPER.BO's P/E ratio is 18.14. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SESHAPAPER.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is more volatile compared to SESHAPAPER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check SESHAPAPER.BO's competition here
SATIA.NS vs BALLARPUR.NS Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, BALLARPUR.NS has a market cap of 14.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while BALLARPUR.NS trades at ₹257.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas BALLARPUR.NS's P/E ratio is -0.26. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to BALLARPUR.NS's ROE of -0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is less volatile compared to BALLARPUR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check BALLARPUR.NS's competition here
SATIA.NS vs ANDHRAPAP.NS Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, ANDHRAPAP.NS has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while ANDHRAPAP.NS trades at ₹60.86.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas ANDHRAPAP.NS's P/E ratio is 64.74. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ANDHRAPAP.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is more volatile compared to ANDHRAPAP.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check ANDHRAPAP.NS's competition here
SATIA.NS vs ANDHRAPAP.BO Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, ANDHRAPAP.BO has a market cap of 12.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while ANDHRAPAP.BO trades at ₹60.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas ANDHRAPAP.BO's P/E ratio is 64.55. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ANDHRAPAP.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is more volatile compared to ANDHRAPAP.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check ANDHRAPAP.BO's competition here
SATIA.NS vs TNPL.BO Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, TNPL.BO has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while TNPL.BO trades at ₹128.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas TNPL.BO's P/E ratio is 30.13. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TNPL.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is more volatile compared to TNPL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check TNPL.BO's competition here
SATIA.NS vs TNPL.NS Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, TNPL.NS has a market cap of 8.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while TNPL.NS trades at ₹128.53.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas TNPL.NS's P/E ratio is 30.03. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to TNPL.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is more volatile compared to TNPL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check TNPL.NS's competition here
SATIA.NS vs NRAGRINDQ.BO Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, NRAGRINDQ.BO has a market cap of 7.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while NRAGRINDQ.BO trades at ₹441.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas NRAGRINDQ.BO's P/E ratio is 6.91. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NRAGRINDQ.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is more volatile compared to NRAGRINDQ.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check NRAGRINDQ.BO's competition here
SATIA.NS vs NRAIL.NS Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, NRAIL.NS has a market cap of 7.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while NRAIL.NS trades at ₹423.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas NRAIL.NS's P/E ratio is 31.77. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NRAIL.NS's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is more volatile compared to NRAIL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check NRAIL.NS's competition here
SATIA.NS vs NRAIL.BO Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, NRAIL.BO has a market cap of 7.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while NRAIL.BO trades at ₹415.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas NRAIL.BO's P/E ratio is 31.27. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NRAIL.BO's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is more volatile compared to NRAIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check NRAIL.BO's competition here
SATIA.NS vs PDMJEPAPER.NS Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, PDMJEPAPER.NS has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while PDMJEPAPER.NS trades at ₹70.88.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas PDMJEPAPER.NS's P/E ratio is 7.25. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PDMJEPAPER.NS's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is more volatile compared to PDMJEPAPER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check PDMJEPAPER.NS's competition here
SATIA.NS vs PDMJEPAPER.BO Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, PDMJEPAPER.BO has a market cap of 6.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while PDMJEPAPER.BO trades at ₹70.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas PDMJEPAPER.BO's P/E ratio is 7.25. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PDMJEPAPER.BO's ROE of +0.16%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is more volatile compared to PDMJEPAPER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check PDMJEPAPER.BO's competition here
SATIA.NS vs KUANTUM.BO Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, KUANTUM.BO has a market cap of 6.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while KUANTUM.BO trades at ₹69.82.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas KUANTUM.BO's P/E ratio is 11.35. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KUANTUM.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is less volatile compared to KUANTUM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check KUANTUM.BO's competition here
SATIA.NS vs KUANTUM.NS Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, KUANTUM.NS has a market cap of 6B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while KUANTUM.NS trades at ₹69.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas KUANTUM.NS's P/E ratio is 11.23. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KUANTUM.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is more volatile compared to KUANTUM.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check KUANTUM.NS's competition here
SATIA.NS vs SATIA.BO Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, SATIA.BO has a market cap of 5.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while SATIA.BO trades at ₹55.80.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas SATIA.BO's P/E ratio is 7.91. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SATIA.BO's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is less volatile compared to SATIA.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check SATIA.BO's competition here
SATIA.NS vs RAMANEWS.BO Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, RAMANEWS.BO has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while RAMANEWS.BO trades at ₹30.68.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas RAMANEWS.BO's P/E ratio is -15.26. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RAMANEWS.BO's ROE of -15.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is less volatile compared to RAMANEWS.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check RAMANEWS.BO's competition here
SATIA.NS vs RAMANEWS.NS Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, RAMANEWS.NS has a market cap of 4.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while RAMANEWS.NS trades at ₹30.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas RAMANEWS.NS's P/E ratio is -14.53. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RAMANEWS.NS's ROE of -15.49%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is more volatile compared to RAMANEWS.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check RAMANEWS.NS's competition here
SATIA.NS vs PAKKA.NS Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, PAKKA.NS has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while PAKKA.NS trades at ₹86.18.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas PAKKA.NS's P/E ratio is 64.31. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PAKKA.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is more volatile compared to PAKKA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check PAKKA.NS's competition here
SATIA.NS vs PAKKA.BO Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, PAKKA.BO has a market cap of 3.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while PAKKA.BO trades at ₹85.73.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas PAKKA.BO's P/E ratio is 63.98. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to PAKKA.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is more volatile compared to PAKKA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check PAKKA.BO's competition here
SATIA.NS vs EMAMIPAP.BO Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, EMAMIPAP.BO has a market cap of 3.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while EMAMIPAP.BO trades at ₹61.89.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas EMAMIPAP.BO's P/E ratio is 25.90. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to EMAMIPAP.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is less volatile compared to EMAMIPAP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check EMAMIPAP.BO's competition here
SATIA.NS vs ORIENTPPR.NS Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, ORIENTPPR.NS has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while ORIENTPPR.NS trades at ₹16.09.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas ORIENTPPR.NS's P/E ratio is -9.46. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ORIENTPPR.NS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is less volatile compared to ORIENTPPR.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check ORIENTPPR.NS's competition here
SATIA.NS vs ORIENTPPR.BO Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, ORIENTPPR.BO has a market cap of 3.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while ORIENTPPR.BO trades at ₹16.06.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas ORIENTPPR.BO's P/E ratio is -13.50. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ORIENTPPR.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is less volatile compared to ORIENTPPR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check ORIENTPPR.BO's competition here
SATIA.NS vs RIDDHI.BO Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, RIDDHI.BO has a market cap of 3.1B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while RIDDHI.BO trades at ₹438.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas RIDDHI.BO's P/E ratio is 11.18. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RIDDHI.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is more volatile compared to RIDDHI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check RIDDHI.BO's competition here
SATIA.NS vs RUCHIRA.BO Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, RUCHIRA.BO has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while RUCHIRA.BO trades at ₹100.29.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas RUCHIRA.BO's P/E ratio is 4.44. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RUCHIRA.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is more volatile compared to RUCHIRA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check RUCHIRA.BO's competition here
SATIA.NS vs RUCHIRA.NS Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, RUCHIRA.NS has a market cap of 3B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while RUCHIRA.NS trades at ₹100.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas RUCHIRA.NS's P/E ratio is 5.64. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RUCHIRA.NS's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is more volatile compared to RUCHIRA.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check RUCHIRA.NS's competition here
SATIA.NS vs GENUSPAPER.NS Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, GENUSPAPER.NS has a market cap of 2.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while GENUSPAPER.NS trades at ₹10.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas GENUSPAPER.NS's P/E ratio is 28.00. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GENUSPAPER.NS's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is less volatile compared to GENUSPAPER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check GENUSPAPER.NS's competition here
SATIA.NS vs GENUSPAPER.BO Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, GENUSPAPER.BO has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while GENUSPAPER.BO trades at ₹10.30.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas GENUSPAPER.BO's P/E ratio is 27.84. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GENUSPAPER.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is less volatile compared to GENUSPAPER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check GENUSPAPER.BO's competition here
SATIA.NS vs SAPPL.BO Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, SAPPL.BO has a market cap of 2.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while SAPPL.BO trades at ₹264.50.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas SAPPL.BO's P/E ratio is 9.57. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SAPPL.BO's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is more volatile compared to SAPPL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check SAPPL.BO's competition here
SATIA.NS vs STARPAPER.BO Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, STARPAPER.BO has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while STARPAPER.BO trades at ₹128.65.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas STARPAPER.BO's P/E ratio is 5.14. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to STARPAPER.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is more volatile compared to STARPAPER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check STARPAPER.BO's competition here
SATIA.NS vs STARPAPER.NS Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, STARPAPER.NS has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while STARPAPER.NS trades at ₹128.13.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas STARPAPER.NS's P/E ratio is 5.12. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to STARPAPER.NS's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is more volatile compared to STARPAPER.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check STARPAPER.NS's competition here
SATIA.NS vs SHREYANIND.BO Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, SHREYANIND.BO has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while SHREYANIND.BO trades at ₹139.20.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas SHREYANIND.BO's P/E ratio is 4.09. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SHREYANIND.BO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is less volatile compared to SHREYANIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check SHREYANIND.BO's competition here
SATIA.NS vs SHREYANIND.NS Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, SHREYANIND.NS has a market cap of 1.9B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while SHREYANIND.NS trades at ₹138.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas SHREYANIND.NS's P/E ratio is 5.40. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SHREYANIND.NS's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is less volatile compared to SHREYANIND.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check SHREYANIND.NS's competition here
SATIA.NS vs VRWODAR.BO Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, VRWODAR.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while VRWODAR.BO trades at ₹115.40.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas VRWODAR.BO's P/E ratio is 101.23. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to VRWODAR.BO's ROE of -1.22%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is less volatile compared to VRWODAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check VRWODAR.BO's competition here
SATIA.NS vs STHINPA.BO Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, STHINPA.BO has a market cap of 1.7B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while STHINPA.BO trades at ₹89.25.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas STHINPA.BO's P/E ratio is 42.70. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to STHINPA.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is more volatile compared to STHINPA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check STHINPA.BO's competition here
SATIA.NS vs ECOBOAR.BO Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, ECOBOAR.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while ECOBOAR.BO trades at ₹62.94.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas ECOBOAR.BO's P/E ratio is -9.59. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ECOBOAR.BO's ROE of -6.67%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is less volatile compared to ECOBOAR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check ECOBOAR.BO's competition here
SATIA.NS vs DUROPLY.BO Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, DUROPLY.BO has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while DUROPLY.BO trades at ₹132.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas DUROPLY.BO's P/E ratio is 17.70. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DUROPLY.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is more volatile compared to DUROPLY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check DUROPLY.BO's competition here
SATIA.NS vs ARCHIDPLY.NS Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, ARCHIDPLY.NS has a market cap of 1.4B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while ARCHIDPLY.NS trades at ₹68.14.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas ARCHIDPLY.NS's P/E ratio is 28.63. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ARCHIDPLY.NS's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is less volatile compared to ARCHIDPLY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check ARCHIDPLY.NS's competition here
SATIA.NS vs ARCHIDPLY.BO Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, ARCHIDPLY.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while ARCHIDPLY.BO trades at ₹67.75.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas ARCHIDPLY.BO's P/E ratio is 28.47. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ARCHIDPLY.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is more volatile compared to ARCHIDPLY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check ARCHIDPLY.BO's competition here
SATIA.NS vs MAGNUM.NS Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, MAGNUM.NS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while MAGNUM.NS trades at ₹19.44.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas MAGNUM.NS's P/E ratio is -11.50. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MAGNUM.NS's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is less volatile compared to MAGNUM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check MAGNUM.NS's competition here
SATIA.NS vs MAGNUM.BO Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, MAGNUM.BO has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while MAGNUM.BO trades at ₹19.19.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas MAGNUM.BO's P/E ratio is -11.36. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MAGNUM.BO's ROE of -0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is less volatile compared to MAGNUM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check MAGNUM.BO's competition here
SATIA.NS vs WIPL.NS Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, WIPL.NS has a market cap of 1.3B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while WIPL.NS trades at ₹150.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas WIPL.NS's P/E ratio is 57.92. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to WIPL.NS's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is more volatile compared to WIPL.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check WIPL.NS's competition here
SATIA.NS vs SKPMIL.BO Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, SKPMIL.BO has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while SKPMIL.BO trades at ₹90.35.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas SKPMIL.BO's P/E ratio is 40.33. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SKPMIL.BO's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is more volatile compared to SKPMIL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check SKPMIL.BO's competition here
SATIA.NS vs NATHIND.BO Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, NATHIND.BO has a market cap of 921.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while NATHIND.BO trades at ₹48.49.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas NATHIND.BO's P/E ratio is 7.37. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NATHIND.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is less volatile compared to NATHIND.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check NATHIND.BO's competition here
SATIA.NS vs GANGAPA.BO Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, GANGAPA.BO has a market cap of 739.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while GANGAPA.BO trades at ₹68.55.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas GANGAPA.BO's P/E ratio is 51.16. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GANGAPA.BO's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is more volatile compared to GANGAPA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check GANGAPA.BO's competition here
SATIA.NS vs UNIPLY.NS Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, UNIPLY.NS has a market cap of 670.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while UNIPLY.NS trades at ₹4.00.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas UNIPLY.NS's P/E ratio is -1.42. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to UNIPLY.NS's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is less volatile compared to UNIPLY.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check UNIPLY.NS's competition here
SATIA.NS vs DHANROTO.BO Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, DHANROTO.BO has a market cap of 583.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while DHANROTO.BO trades at ₹74.83.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas DHANROTO.BO's P/E ratio is 5.85. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DHANROTO.BO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is less volatile compared to DHANROTO.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check DHANROTO.BO's competition here
SATIA.NS vs SUNDARAM.BO Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, SUNDARAM.BO has a market cap of 582.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while SUNDARAM.BO trades at ₹1.23.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas SUNDARAM.BO's P/E ratio is 61.50. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SUNDARAM.BO's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is less volatile compared to SUNDARAM.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check SUNDARAM.BO's competition here
SATIA.NS vs SUNDARAM.NS Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, SUNDARAM.NS has a market cap of 578.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while SUNDARAM.NS trades at ₹1.22.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas SUNDARAM.NS's P/E ratio is 61.00. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SUNDARAM.NS's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is less volatile compared to SUNDARAM.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check SUNDARAM.NS's competition here
SATIA.NS vs NATPLY.BO Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, NATPLY.BO has a market cap of 558.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while NATPLY.BO trades at ₹4.58.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas NATPLY.BO's P/E ratio is -3.82. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to NATPLY.BO's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is more volatile compared to NATPLY.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check NATPLY.BO's competition here
SATIA.NS vs MALUPAPER.NS Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, MALUPAPER.NS has a market cap of 511.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while MALUPAPER.NS trades at ₹29.99.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas MALUPAPER.NS's P/E ratio is -2.60. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MALUPAPER.NS's ROE of +2.82%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is less volatile compared to MALUPAPER.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check MALUPAPER.NS's competition here
SATIA.NS vs MALUPAPER.BO Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, MALUPAPER.BO has a market cap of 510.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while MALUPAPER.BO trades at ₹29.90.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas MALUPAPER.BO's P/E ratio is -2.80. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to MALUPAPER.BO's ROE of +2.82%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is more volatile compared to MALUPAPER.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check MALUPAPER.BO's competition here
SATIA.NS vs DANUBE.BO Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, DANUBE.BO has a market cap of 364.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while DANUBE.BO trades at ₹4.01.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas DANUBE.BO's P/E ratio is 19.10. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DANUBE.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is more volatile compared to DANUBE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check DANUBE.BO's competition here
SATIA.NS vs CELLA.BO Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, CELLA.BO has a market cap of 271M. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while CELLA.BO trades at ₹13.45.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas CELLA.BO's P/E ratio is 14.46. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to CELLA.BO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is more volatile compared to CELLA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check CELLA.BO's competition here
SATIA.NS vs SHRENIK.NS Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, SHRENIK.NS has a market cap of 232.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while SHRENIK.NS trades at ₹0.38.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas SHRENIK.NS's P/E ratio is -12.67. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SHRENIK.NS's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is more volatile compared to SHRENIK.NS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check SHRENIK.NS's competition here
SATIA.NS vs ASIANTNE.BO Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, ASIANTNE.BO has a market cap of 228.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while ASIANTNE.BO trades at ₹9.15.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas ASIANTNE.BO's P/E ratio is -43.57. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ASIANTNE.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is more volatile compared to ASIANTNE.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check ASIANTNE.BO's competition here
SATIA.NS vs SANPA.BO Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, SANPA.BO has a market cap of 198.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while SANPA.BO trades at ₹152.10.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas SANPA.BO's P/E ratio is 10.58. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SANPA.BO's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is more volatile compared to SANPA.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check SANPA.BO's competition here
SATIA.NS vs SAFFRON.BO Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, SAFFRON.BO has a market cap of 175.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while SAFFRON.BO trades at ₹24.37.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas SAFFRON.BO's P/E ratio is 4.62. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SAFFRON.BO's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is more volatile compared to SAFFRON.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check SAFFRON.BO's competition here
SATIA.NS vs KAYPOWR.BO Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, KAYPOWR.BO has a market cap of 169M. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while KAYPOWR.BO trades at ₹8.63.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas KAYPOWR.BO's P/E ratio is -431.50. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to KAYPOWR.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is less volatile compared to KAYPOWR.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check KAYPOWR.BO's competition here
SATIA.NS vs ASTRON.NS Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, ASTRON.NS has a market cap of 164.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while ASTRON.NS trades at ₹3.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas ASTRON.NS's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ASTRON.NS's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is less volatile compared to ASTRON.NS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check ASTRON.NS's competition here
SATIA.NS vs ASTRON.BO Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, ASTRON.BO has a market cap of 164.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while ASTRON.BO trades at ₹3.54.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas ASTRON.BO's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to ASTRON.BO's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is less volatile compared to ASTRON.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check ASTRON.BO's competition here
SATIA.NS vs SCTL.BO Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, SCTL.BO has a market cap of 150.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while SCTL.BO trades at ₹0.59.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas SCTL.BO's P/E ratio is 2.46. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SCTL.BO's ROE of -0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is less volatile compared to SCTL.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check SCTL.BO's competition here
SATIA.NS vs RAMAPPR-B.BO Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, RAMAPPR-B.BO has a market cap of 132.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while RAMAPPR-B.BO trades at ₹13.70.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas RAMAPPR-B.BO's P/E ratio is -1.09. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to RAMAPPR-B.BO's ROE of +0.26%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is more volatile compared to RAMAPPR-B.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check RAMAPPR-B.BO's competition here
SATIA.NS vs SHKARTP.BO Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, SHKARTP.BO has a market cap of 100.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while SHKARTP.BO trades at ₹5.28.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas SHKARTP.BO's P/E ratio is -24.00. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to SHKARTP.BO's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is less volatile compared to SHKARTP.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check SHKARTP.BO's competition here
SATIA.NS vs AGIOPAPER.BO Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, AGIOPAPER.BO has a market cap of 63.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while AGIOPAPER.BO trades at ₹3.95.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas AGIOPAPER.BO's P/E ratio is -0.35. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to AGIOPAPER.BO's ROE of +6.78%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is less volatile compared to AGIOPAPER.BO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check AGIOPAPER.BO's competition here
SATIA.NS vs GRATEXI.BO Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, GRATEXI.BO has a market cap of 52.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while GRATEXI.BO trades at ₹17.36.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas GRATEXI.BO's P/E ratio is 62.00. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to GRATEXI.BO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is more volatile compared to GRATEXI.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check GRATEXI.BO's competition here
SATIA.NS vs DGL.BO Comparison April 2026
SATIA.NS plays a significant role within the Basic Materials sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.
Comparing market capitalization, SATIA.NS stands at 5.6B. In comparison, DGL.BO has a market cap of 10.7M. Regarding current trading prices, SATIA.NS is priced at ₹55.71, while DGL.BO trades at ₹1.08.
To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.
SATIA.NS currently has a P/E ratio of 7.90, whereas DGL.BO's P/E ratio is -0.36. In terms of profitability, SATIA.NS's ROE is +0.07%, compared to DGL.BO's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, SATIA.NS is more volatile compared to DGL.BO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SATIA.NS.Check DGL.BO's competition here