S&W Seed Company

SANW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SANW stands at 43.2K. In comparison, ADM has a market cap of 32.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SANW is priced at $0.02, while ADM trades at $68.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SANW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ADM's P/E ratio is 30.43. In terms of profitability, SANW's ROE is -0.58%, compared to ADM's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SANW is less volatile compared to ADM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SANW.Check ADM's competition here

SANW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SANW stands at 43.2K. In comparison, BG has a market cap of 23.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SANW is priced at $0.02, while BG trades at $123.49.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SANW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas BG's P/E ratio is 28.77. In terms of profitability, SANW's ROE is -0.58%, compared to BG's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SANW is less volatile compared to BG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SANW.Check BG's competition here

SANW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SANW stands at 43.2K. In comparison, TSN has a market cap of 22.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SANW is priced at $0.02, while TSN trades at $64.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SANW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas TSN's P/E ratio is 114.11. In terms of profitability, SANW's ROE is -0.58%, compared to TSN's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SANW is less volatile compared to TSN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SANW.Check TSN's competition here

SANW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SANW stands at 43.2K. In comparison, SFD has a market cap of 9.8B. Regarding current trading prices, SANW is priced at $0.02, while SFD trades at $24.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SANW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SFD's P/E ratio is 11.28. In terms of profitability, SANW's ROE is -0.58%, compared to SFD's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, SANW is less volatile compared to SFD. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SANW.Check SFD's competition here

SANW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SANW stands at 43.2K. In comparison, AGRO has a market cap of 4.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SANW is priced at $0.02, while AGRO trades at $8.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SANW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AGRO's P/E ratio is 38.33. In terms of profitability, SANW's ROE is -0.58%, compared to AGRO's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, SANW is less volatile compared to AGRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SANW.Check AGRO's competition here

SANW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SANW stands at 43.2K. In comparison, CALM has a market cap of 4B. Regarding current trading prices, SANW is priced at $0.02, while CALM trades at $83.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SANW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CALM's P/E ratio is 3.54. In terms of profitability, SANW's ROE is -0.58%, compared to CALM's ROE of +0.45%. Regarding short-term risk, SANW is less volatile compared to CALM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SANW.Check CALM's competition here

SANW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SANW stands at 43.2K. In comparison, IBA has a market cap of 2.6B. Regarding current trading prices, SANW is priced at $0.02, while IBA trades at $53.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SANW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas IBA's P/E ratio is 7.77. In terms of profitability, SANW's ROE is -0.58%, compared to IBA's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SANW is less volatile compared to IBA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SANW.Check IBA's competition here

SANW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SANW stands at 43.2K. In comparison, FDP has a market cap of 2B. Regarding current trading prices, SANW is priced at $0.02, while FDP trades at $42.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SANW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas FDP's P/E ratio is 25.27. In terms of profitability, SANW's ROE is -0.58%, compared to FDP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, SANW is less volatile compared to FDP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SANW.Check FDP's competition here

SANW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SANW stands at 43.2K. In comparison, DOLE has a market cap of 1.5B. Regarding current trading prices, SANW is priced at $0.02, while DOLE trades at $15.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SANW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DOLE's P/E ratio is 12.69. In terms of profitability, SANW's ROE is -0.58%, compared to DOLE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, SANW is less volatile compared to DOLE. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SANW.Check DOLE's competition here

SANW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SANW stands at 43.2K. In comparison, VITL has a market cap of 1.2B. Regarding current trading prices, SANW is priced at $0.02, while VITL trades at $27.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SANW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas VITL's P/E ratio is 20.58. In terms of profitability, SANW's ROE is -0.58%, compared to VITL's ROE of +0.20%. Regarding short-term risk, SANW is less volatile compared to VITL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SANW.Check VITL's competition here

SANW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SANW stands at 43.2K. In comparison, VFF has a market cap of 419.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SANW is priced at $0.02, while VFF trades at $3.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SANW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas VFF's P/E ratio is 72.60. In terms of profitability, SANW's ROE is -0.58%, compared to VFF's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, SANW is less volatile compared to VFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SANW.Check VFF's competition here

SANW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SANW stands at 43.2K. In comparison, LND has a market cap of 396M. Regarding current trading prices, SANW is priced at $0.02, while LND trades at $3.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SANW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LND's P/E ratio is 14.72. In terms of profitability, SANW's ROE is -0.58%, compared to LND's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, SANW is less volatile compared to LND. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SANW.Check LND's competition here

SANW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SANW stands at 43.2K. In comparison, CHSCP has a market cap of 345.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SANW is priced at $0.02, while CHSCP trades at $28.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SANW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CHSCP's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SANW's ROE is -0.58%, compared to CHSCP's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SANW is less volatile compared to CHSCP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SANW.Check CHSCP's competition here

SANW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SANW stands at 43.2K. In comparison, CHSCO has a market cap of 322.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SANW is priced at $0.02, while CHSCO trades at $26.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SANW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CHSCO's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SANW's ROE is -0.58%, compared to CHSCO's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SANW is less volatile compared to CHSCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SANW.Check CHSCO's competition here

SANW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SANW stands at 43.2K. In comparison, ALCO has a market cap of 316.8M. Regarding current trading prices, SANW is priced at $0.02, while ALCO trades at $40.36.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SANW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas ALCO's P/E ratio is -2.23. In terms of profitability, SANW's ROE is -0.58%, compared to ALCO's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SANW is less volatile compared to ALCO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SANW.Check ALCO's competition here

SANW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SANW stands at 43.2K. In comparison, CHSCL has a market cap of 314.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SANW is priced at $0.02, while CHSCL trades at $25.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SANW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CHSCL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SANW's ROE is -0.58%, compared to CHSCL's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SANW is less volatile compared to CHSCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SANW.Check CHSCL's competition here

SANW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SANW stands at 43.2K. In comparison, CHSCN has a market cap of 312.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SANW is priced at $0.02, while CHSCN trades at $25.47.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SANW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CHSCN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SANW's ROE is -0.58%, compared to CHSCN's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SANW is less volatile compared to CHSCN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SANW.Check CHSCN's competition here

SANW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SANW stands at 43.2K. In comparison, CHSCM has a market cap of 308.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SANW is priced at $0.02, while CHSCM trades at $25.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SANW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas CHSCM's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SANW's ROE is -0.58%, compared to CHSCM's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, SANW is less volatile compared to CHSCM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SANW.Check CHSCM's competition here

SANW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SANW stands at 43.2K. In comparison, AFRI has a market cap of 266.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SANW is priced at $0.02, while AFRI trades at $9.89.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SANW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AFRI's P/E ratio is -12.69. In terms of profitability, SANW's ROE is -0.58%, compared to AFRI's ROE of -2.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SANW is less volatile compared to AFRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SANW.Check AFRI's competition here

SANW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SANW stands at 43.2K. In comparison, LMNR has a market cap of 254.9M. Regarding current trading prices, SANW is priced at $0.02, while LMNR trades at $14.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SANW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LMNR's P/E ratio is -15.13. In terms of profitability, SANW's ROE is -0.58%, compared to LMNR's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, SANW is less volatile compared to LMNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SANW.Check LMNR's competition here

SANW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SANW stands at 43.2K. In comparison, AGFS has a market cap of 161.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SANW is priced at $0.02, while AGFS trades at $3.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SANW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AGFS's P/E ratio is -2.61. In terms of profitability, SANW's ROE is -0.58%, compared to AGFS's ROE of -0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, SANW is less volatile compared to AGFS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SANW.Check AGFS's competition here

SANW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SANW stands at 43.2K. In comparison, LOCL has a market cap of 39.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SANW is priced at $0.02, while LOCL trades at $1.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SANW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas LOCL's P/E ratio is -0.18. In terms of profitability, SANW's ROE is -0.58%, compared to LOCL's ROE of +0.97%. Regarding short-term risk, SANW is less volatile compared to LOCL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SANW.Check LOCL's competition here

SANW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SANW stands at 43.2K. In comparison, PME has a market cap of 23.2M. Regarding current trading prices, SANW is priced at $0.02, while PME trades at $0.27.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SANW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas PME's P/E ratio is 13.50. In terms of profitability, SANW's ROE is -0.58%, compared to PME's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SANW is less volatile compared to PME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SANW.Check PME's competition here

SANW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SANW stands at 43.2K. In comparison, AFRIW has a market cap of 20.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SANW is priced at $0.02, while AFRIW trades at $0.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SANW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AFRIW's P/E ratio is -33.33. In terms of profitability, SANW's ROE is -0.58%, compared to AFRIW's ROE of -2.30%. Regarding short-term risk, SANW is less volatile compared to AFRIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SANW.Check AFRIW's competition here

SANW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SANW stands at 43.2K. In comparison, APPH has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SANW is priced at $0.02, while APPH trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SANW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas APPH's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, SANW's ROE is -0.58%, compared to APPH's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, SANW is less volatile compared to APPH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SANW.Check APPH's competition here

SANW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SANW stands at 43.2K. In comparison, APPHW has a market cap of 10.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SANW is priced at $0.02, while APPHW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SANW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas APPHW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SANW's ROE is -0.58%, compared to APPHW's ROE of -0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, SANW is less volatile compared to APPHW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SANW.Check APPHW's competition here

SANW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SANW stands at 43.2K. In comparison, EDBLW has a market cap of 4.6M. Regarding current trading prices, SANW is priced at $0.02, while EDBLW trades at $0.11.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SANW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas EDBLW's P/E ratio is -0.08. In terms of profitability, SANW's ROE is -0.58%, compared to EDBLW's ROE of -1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, SANW is less volatile compared to EDBLW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SANW.Check EDBLW's competition here

SANW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SANW stands at 43.2K. In comparison, AQB has a market cap of 3.4M. Regarding current trading prices, SANW is priced at $0.02, while AQB trades at $0.93.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SANW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AQB's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, SANW's ROE is -0.58%, compared to AQB's ROE of -6.03%. Regarding short-term risk, SANW is less volatile compared to AQB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SANW.Check AQB's competition here

SANW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SANW stands at 43.2K. In comparison, SDOT has a market cap of 2.3M. Regarding current trading prices, SANW is priced at $0.02, while SDOT trades at $2.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SANW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas SDOT's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, SANW's ROE is -0.58%, compared to SDOT's ROE of -0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, SANW is less volatile compared to SDOT. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SANW.Check SDOT's competition here

SANW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SANW stands at 43.2K. In comparison, KALWW has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SANW is priced at $0.02, while KALWW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SANW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas KALWW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SANW's ROE is -0.58%, compared to KALWW's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SANW is less volatile compared to KALWW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SANW.Check KALWW's competition here

SANW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SANW stands at 43.2K. In comparison, KAL has a market cap of 2.1M. Regarding current trading prices, SANW is priced at $0.02, while KAL trades at $1.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SANW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas KAL's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SANW's ROE is -0.58%, compared to KAL's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, SANW is less volatile compared to KAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SANW.Check KAL's competition here

SANW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SANW stands at 43.2K. In comparison, AGRI has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SANW is priced at $0.02, while AGRI trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SANW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AGRI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SANW's ROE is -0.58%, compared to AGRI's ROE of -2.70%. Regarding short-term risk, SANW is less volatile compared to AGRI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SANW.Check AGRI's competition here

SANW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SANW stands at 43.2K. In comparison, AVX has a market cap of 1.5M. Regarding current trading prices, SANW is priced at $0.02, while AVX trades at $0.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SANW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AVX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SANW's ROE is -0.58%, compared to AVX's ROE of -2.70%. Regarding short-term risk, SANW is less volatile compared to AVX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SANW.Check AVX's competition here

SANW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SANW stands at 43.2K. In comparison, EDBL has a market cap of 985.7K. Regarding current trading prices, SANW is priced at $0.02, while EDBL trades at $3.59.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SANW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas EDBL's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, SANW's ROE is -0.58%, compared to EDBL's ROE of -1.63%. Regarding short-term risk, SANW is less volatile compared to EDBL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SANW.Check EDBL's competition here

SANW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SANW stands at 43.2K. In comparison, AAGR has a market cap of 572.9K. Regarding current trading prices, SANW is priced at $0.02, while AAGR trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SANW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AAGR's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SANW's ROE is -0.58%, compared to AAGR's ROE of +3.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SANW and AAGR have similar daily volatility (0.00).Check AAGR's competition here

SANW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SANW stands at 43.2K. In comparison, DTCK has a market cap of 122.1K. Regarding current trading prices, SANW is priced at $0.02, while DTCK trades at $0.13.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SANW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas DTCK's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, SANW's ROE is -0.58%, compared to DTCK's ROE of -0.60%. Regarding short-term risk, SANW is less volatile compared to DTCK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SANW.Check DTCK's competition here

SANW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SANW stands at 43.2K. In comparison, AGRIW has a market cap of 66.2K. Regarding current trading prices, SANW is priced at $0.02, while AGRIW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SANW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AGRIW's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, SANW's ROE is -0.58%, compared to AGRIW's ROE of -2.70%. Regarding short-term risk, SANW is less volatile compared to AGRIW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SANW.Check AGRIW's competition here

SANW plays a significant role within the Consumer Defensive sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, SANW stands at 43.2K. In comparison, AAGRW has a market cap of 57.9K. Regarding current trading prices, SANW is priced at $0.02, while AAGRW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

SANW currently has a P/E ratio of -0.01, whereas AAGRW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, SANW's ROE is -0.58%, compared to AAGRW's ROE of +3.27%. Regarding short-term risk, SANW is less volatile compared to AAGRW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for SANW.Check AAGRW's competition here